+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Morality and the Modern World Area 1. Morality and the Modern World Area 1 The Relationship Between...

Morality and the Modern World Area 1. Morality and the Modern World Area 1 The Relationship Between...

Date post: 02-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: shannon-alexander
View: 222 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
22
Morality and the Modern World Area 1
Transcript
Page 1: Morality and the Modern World Area 1. Morality and the Modern World Area 1 The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values.

Morality and the Modern

World Area 1

Page 2: Morality and the Modern World Area 1. Morality and the Modern World Area 1 The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values.

Morality and the Modern

World Area 1

The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values

Page 3: Morality and the Modern World Area 1. Morality and the Modern World Area 1 The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values.

Morality and the Modern

World Area 1

The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values

Euthyphro Dilemma

Page 4: Morality and the Modern World Area 1. Morality and the Modern World Area 1 The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values.

Morality and the Modern

World Area 1

The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values

Euthyphro Dilemma

Discussion between Socrates and Euthyphro.

What makes an action morally good?

Euthyphro – Whatever the Gods command is morally good.

Socrates – actions are good in themselves, goodness is independent of Gods.

Do Gods command things because they are good? Or are they good because God commands them.

Page 5: Morality and the Modern World Area 1. Morality and the Modern World Area 1 The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values.

Morality and the Modern

World Area 1

The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values

Euthyphro Dilemma

Divine Command Theory

Page 6: Morality and the Modern World Area 1. Morality and the Modern World Area 1 The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values.

Morality and the Modern

World Area 1

The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values

Divine Command Theory

Things are good or bad solely on Gods commands.

God could command anything e.g. rape or murder and they would become morally good.

Example from Bible – Jesus brutal death is morally right?

God created everything, including morals.

God has authority to tell us how to act.

Page 7: Morality and the Modern World Area 1. Morality and the Modern World Area 1 The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values.

Morality and the Modern

World Area 1

The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values

Euthyphro Dilemma

Divine Command Theory

Religious Morality

Page 8: Morality and the Modern World Area 1. Morality and the Modern World Area 1 The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values.

Morality and the Modern

World Area 1

The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values

Religious Morality

Tradition

Books/Scripture

Interpretation e.g. Bible

Religious Leaders e.g. Pope

ReasonThink through the decision.

Symbolism

Examples

How have followers of this religion acted in history?

10 Commandments

The Golden Rule

Page 9: Morality and the Modern World Area 1. Morality and the Modern World Area 1 The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values.

Morality and the Modern

World Area 1

The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values

Euthyphro Dilemma

Divine Command Theory

Religious Morality

Absolute

Page 10: Morality and the Modern World Area 1. Morality and the Modern World Area 1 The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values.

Morality and the Modern

World Area 1

The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values

Euthyphro Dilemma

Divine Command Theory

Religious Morality

Absolute

Moral rules hold true at all times and cannot be changed.

Page 11: Morality and the Modern World Area 1. Morality and the Modern World Area 1 The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values.

Morality and the Modern

World Area 1

The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values

Euthyphro Dilemma

Divine Command Theory

Religious Morality

Absolute

Rela

tive Moral

rules hold true at all times and cannot be changed.

Page 12: Morality and the Modern World Area 1. Morality and the Modern World Area 1 The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values.

Morality and the Modern

World Area 1

The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values

Euthyphro Dilemma

Divine Command Theory

Religious Morality

Absolute

Rela

tive Moral

rules hold true at all times and cannot be changed.

Moral rules are relative to individual, society or situation.

Page 13: Morality and the Modern World Area 1. Morality and the Modern World Area 1 The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values.

Morality and the Modern

World Area 1

The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values

Euthyphro Dilemma

Divine Command Theory

Religious Morality

Absolute

Rela

tive Moral

rules hold true at all times and cannot be changed.

Moral rules are relative to individual, society or situation.

Autonomy

Page 14: Morality and the Modern World Area 1. Morality and the Modern World Area 1 The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values.

Morality and the Modern

World Area 1

The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values

Euthyphro Dilemma

Divine Command Theory

Religious Morality

Absolute

Rela

tive Moral

rules hold true at all times and cannot be changed.

Moral rules are relative to individual, society or situation.

Autonomy

Moral rules are objective. One chooses what is right or wrong.

Page 15: Morality and the Modern World Area 1. Morality and the Modern World Area 1 The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values.

Morality and the Modern

World Area 1

The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values

Euthyphro Dilemma

Divine Command Theory

Religious Morality

Absolute

Rela

tive Moral

rules hold true at all times and cannot be changed.

Moral rules are relative to individual, society or situation.

Autonomy

Moral rules are objective. One chooses what is right or wrong.

Heteronomy

Page 16: Morality and the Modern World Area 1. Morality and the Modern World Area 1 The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values.

Morality and the Modern

World Area 1

The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values

Euthyphro Dilemma

Divine Command Theory

Religious Morality

Absolute

Rela

tive Moral

rules hold true at all times and cannot be changed.

Moral rules are relative to individual, society or situation.

Autonomy

Moral rules are objective. One chooses what is right or wrong.

Heteronomy

Moral rules from external influences e.g. religion.

Page 17: Morality and the Modern World Area 1. Morality and the Modern World Area 1 The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values.

Morality and the Modern

World Area 1

The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values

Euthyphro Dilemma

Divine Command Theory

Religious MoralityAbsolute

Rela

tive

Autonomy

Heteronomy

Guiding Principles of Morality

Page 18: Morality and the Modern World Area 1. Morality and the Modern World Area 1 The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values.

Morality and the Modern

World Area 1

The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values

Euthyphro Dilemma

Divine Command Theory

Religious MoralityAbsolute

Rela

tive

Autonomy

Heteronomy

Guiding Principles of Morality

Utilitarianism

Page 19: Morality and the Modern World Area 1. Morality and the Modern World Area 1 The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values.

Morality and the Modern

World Area 1

Guiding Principles of Morality

Utilitarianism

J. S. Mill

Actions are good or bad depending on the outcome.

The moral consequences of the action is the promotion of human happiness and the minimising of unhappiness.

The greatest happiness for the greatest number of people.Act

Utilitarianism

Rule Utilitarianism

J. Bentham

Page 20: Morality and the Modern World Area 1. Morality and the Modern World Area 1 The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values.

Morality and the Modern

World Area 1

The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values

Euthyphro Dilemma

Divine Command Theory

Religious MoralityAbsolute

Rela

tive

Autonomy

Heteronomy

Guiding Principles of Morality

Utilitarianism Kantian Ethics

Page 21: Morality and the Modern World Area 1. Morality and the Modern World Area 1 The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values.

Morality and the Modern

World Area 1

Guiding Principles of Morality

Kantian Ethics

An action is good or bad on the action itself.

Use reason to make decision.

Rules should be universal and absolute.

Follow your duty.

Categorical Imperative- you are the law maker, can the rule be universalised.

What we ought to do we must do.

Page 22: Morality and the Modern World Area 1. Morality and the Modern World Area 1 The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values.

Morality and the Modern

World Area 1

The Relationship Between Religion and Moral Values

Euthyphro Dilemma Divine Command Theory

Religious MoralityAbsolute

Rela

tive Autonom

y

Heteronomy

Guiding Principles of Morality

Utilitarianism Kantian Ethics

Discussion between Socrates and Euthyphro.

What makes an action morally good?

Euthyphro – Whatever the Gods command is morally good.

Socrates – actions are good in themselves, goodness is independent of Gods.

Do Gods command things because they are good? Or are they good because God commands them.

Things are good or bad solely on Gods commands.

God could command anything e.g. rape or murder and they would become morally good.

Example from Bible – Jesus brutal death is morally right?

God created everything, including morals.

God has authority to tell us how to act.

Tradition

Books/Scripture Interpretation e.g. Bible

Religious Leaders e.g. Pope

ReasonThink through the decision.

Symbolism

How have followers of this religion acted in history?

Moral rules hold true at all times and cannot be changed.

Moral rules are relative to individual, society or situation.

Moral rules are objective. One chooses what is right or wrong.

Moral rules from external influences e.g. religion.

An action is good or bad on the action itself.

Use reason to make decision.

Rules should be universal and absolute.

Follow your duty.

Categorical Imperative- you are the law maker, can the rule be universalised.

What we ought to do we must do.

J. S. Mill Actions are good or bad depending on the outcome.

The moral consequences of the action is the promotion of human happiness and the minimising of unhappiness.

The greatest happiness for the greatest number of people.

Act Utilitarianism

Rule UtilitarianismJ. Bentham


Recommended