N:\Projects\3251 Riverside Community College District\010_MDEC\05-MM\01. MI\MM05 090930.doc HMC ARCHITECTS – 3546 Concours Street, Ontario, CA 91764-5583, T:909.989.9979, F:909.483.1400 MEETING MINUTES 5 DATE: September 30, 2009 PROJECT: Riverside Community College District Moreno Valley Campus March Dental Education Center (MDEC) Facility HMC #3251010 PRESENT: Dale Adams, Dale Barajas, Steve Gilson, Rick Hernandez, Dr. Wolde-Ab Isaac, Donna Lesser, Reagan Romali, Gustavo Segura (RCCD) Eera Babtiwale, Ed Salisbury, Ken Salyer (HMC) PURPOSE: The purpose of the meeting was to review schematic floor and site plans. The plans are attached to these Minutes. ITEMS DISCUSSED: 5.1 Developer Items: The following items are not currently defined, and further discussion with March Healthcare Development (MHD) will occur. A. Green Belt: MHD suggested in a previous meeting that a green belt is intended for the site, occupying the space roughly north of the existing water easement. However, a green belt is not indicated in the draft Specific Plan at the project site. B. Entry into Site: HMC distributed an e-mail earlier stating its intention of entering the site not less than 250 feet from the center of Cactus Avenue. C. Undergrounding of Power Poles: HMC distributed another e-mail seeking confirmation that the above ground power poles will be placed underground by MHD, and re-routed as needed to avoid conflicts with potential building locations. D. Specific Plan: Early discussions between RCCD and MHD suggest that the project does not need to comply with the Specific Plan; however, the Schematic Design will be submitted to the developer for review, prior to them submitting it to the Joint Powers Authority. Action/Responsibility: RCCD 5.2 Progress of Site Negotiations: The project should continue to be viewed as following a locally funded, not state funded, process. Nonetheless, specific site design gestures should be restrained, in case the building design must be transferred to a different site. Action/Responsibility: Information
Transcript
N:\Projects\3251 Riverside Community College District\010_MDEC\05-MM\01. MI\MM05 090930.doc
DATE: September 30, 2009 PROJECT: Riverside Community College District Moreno Valley Campus March Dental Education Center (MDEC) Facility HMC #3251010 PRESENT: Dale Adams, Dale Barajas, Steve Gilson, Rick Hernandez, Dr. Wolde-Ab Isaac, Donna Lesser, Reagan Romali, Gustavo Segura (RCCD) Eera Babtiwale, Ed Salisbury, Ken Salyer (HMC) PURPOSE: The purpose of the meeting was to review schematic floor and site plans. The plans are attached to these Minutes. ITEMS DISCUSSED: 5.1 Developer Items: The following items are not currently defined, and further discussion
with March Healthcare Development (MHD) will occur.
A. Green Belt: MHD suggested in a previous meeting that a green belt is intended for the site, occupying the space roughly north of the existing water easement. However, a green belt is not indicated in the draft Specific Plan at the project site.
B. Entry into Site: HMC distributed an e-mail earlier stating its intention of entering
the site not less than 250 feet from the center of Cactus Avenue.
C. Undergrounding of Power Poles: HMC distributed another e-mail seeking confirmation that the above ground power poles will be placed underground by MHD, and re-routed as needed to avoid conflicts with potential building locations.
D. Specific Plan: Early discussions between RCCD and MHD suggest that the
project does not need to comply with the Specific Plan; however, the Schematic Design will be submitted to the developer for review, prior to them submitting it to the Joint Powers Authority.
Action/Responsibility: RCCD
5.2 Progress of Site Negotiations: The project should continue to be viewed as following
a locally funded, not state funded, process. Nonetheless, specific site design gestures should be restrained, in case the building design must be transferred to a different site.
Action/Responsibility: Information
Meeting Minutes 5 September 30, 2009 Page 2
N:\Projects\3251 Riverside Community College District\010_MDEC\05-MM\01. MI\MM05 090930.doc
5.3 Site Design: The building designs are organized to allow them to be flipped, with the
building entry and parking oriented either to the north, or to the south. The preferred approach is not defined at this time.
A. North Entry: A north building entry allows the building entry to face Cactus Avenue.
This lay-out may be preferred if there will not be a green belt installed by MHD. B. South Entry: A south entry allows parking for MDEC to be shared with potential
campus expansion to the south, and creates a large landscaped area between the building and Cactus Avenue.
Action/Responsibility: RCCD
5.4 Floor Plan Option A: This option is the preferred option for further development. The
following comments were noted.
A. The proposed courtyard is highly desirable, and can be used for various events by the school.
B. A detailed lay-out of the lab is needed, to determine the best room shape for the desired furniture and equipment lay-out.
C. Storage rooms should be grouped closer to the delivery door, to prevent deliveries from passing through the clinic. A separate custodial supply room should be added, of ~120 sf. Dental Technology supply should be a maximum of 120 sf, Dental Assistant supply should be a maximum of 100 sf, and Dental Hygiene supply should be a maximum of 120 sf.
D. The telecommunications room should be located in a central location, to prevent long data runs from the MDF to the data outlet (maximum run is 300 total feet). Larger instructional rooms like the Lab may require higher than normal ceilings, to accommodate the District standard 16’x10’ screen used for projection.
E. The Reception area should be directly at the entry, and the Student Lounge and Group Study areas should also be closer to the entry.
F. A patient file storage area of ~300 sf, although not part of the building program, is very desirable. If it is not possible to add a new storage room, storage units within classrooms can also fulfill this function.
G. The size of the large classroom can be reduced to accommodate 40 students, rather than 50.
H. Access to the classroom wing should be separated from the entry by a set of doors.
Action/Responsibility: HMC 5.5 Floor Plan Option B: This option was not preferred. The following comments were
noted.
A. The lay-out is very efficient, but lacks variety. B. The courtyard proportions are not as favorable as Option A.
Action/Responsibility: Information
Meeting Minutes 5 September 30, 2009 Page 3
N:\Projects\3251 Riverside Community College District\010_MDEC\05-MM\01. MI\MM05 090930.doc
5.6 Updated Building Program: The previously approved building program has been
updated to reflect the areas in Option A, and is attached to these Minutes.
Action/Responsibility: Information 5.7 Future Meetings:
A. The next design review meeting is scheduled for 9:00 a.m. October 28, 2009. The location will be determined by RCCD.
B. A small group meeting will occur prior to this, to resolve the best Lab room lay-out. Time, date, and location will be determined.
Action/Responsibility: Information
The above notes document our understanding of items discussed in the above referenced meeting. Unless notice to the contrary is received, the notations will be considered acceptable and HMC will proceed with work based on these understandings. Any discrepancies should be brought to our attention within seven (7) working days of receipt. Submitted by, HMC Architects
Ed Salisbury Project Architect Attachments cc: Those present
Jim Wurst (HMC), Orin Williams (RCCD) File-MM.MI
R C C D : M O R E N O V A L L E Y C O M M U N I T Y C O L L E G E
M A R B D e n t a l E d u c a t i o n a l C e n t e r
09
:29
:09
0 FEET
M D E C : M A R C H A R B D E N T A L E D U C A T I O N A L C E N T E R
S I T E P L A NO P T I O N A
PROPERTY LINE
SETBACKS
PROPOSED BUILDING ZONE
MASTER PLAN PROPERTY LINE10.6 ACRES
PARKING ZONE
EXISTING BUILDINGS
LANDSCAPE ZONE
DEMO BUILDINGS
WATER UTILITY
400’-0” SETBACKFROM STREET CORNER
WATER UTILITY
10’-0” SETBACKSUGGESTED PARKING
SETBACK PER SPECIFIC PLAN
250’-0” SETBACK
N
PROPOSED BUILDING ZONE
PARKING ZONE(APPROXIMATELY
9,000 SF OF PARKINGREQUIRED
PER SPECIFIC PLAN)
LANDSCAPE ZONE
ENTRY
BIOSWALE
09
:29
:09
0 FEET
M D E C : M A R C H A R B D E N T A L E D U C A T I O N A L C E N T E R
400’-0” SETBACK
PROPERTY LINE
SETBACKS
PROPOSED BUILDING ZONE
MASTER PLAN PROPERTY LINE10.6 ACRES
PARKING ZONE
EXISTING BUILDINGS
LANDSCAPE ZONE
DEMO BUILDINGS
WATER UTILITY
400’-0” SETBACKFROM STREET CORNER
WATER UTILITY
10’-0” SETBACKSUGGESTED PARKING
SETBACK PER SPECIFIC PLAN
S I T E P L A NO P T I O N B
N
PROPOSED BUILDING ZONE
PARKING ZONE(APPROXIMATELY
9,000 SF OF PARKINGREQUIRED
PER SPECIFIC PLAN)
ENTRY
LANDSCAPE ZONE BIOSWALE
SE
RV
ICE
LOA
DIN
G
09
:29
:09
0 FEET
M D E C : M A R C H A R B D E N T A L E D U C A T I O N A L C E N T E R
S I T E P L A NO P T I O N A
PROPERTY LINE
SETBACKS
MASTER PLAN PROPERTY LINE10.6 ACRES
PARKING ZONE
LANDSCAPE ZONE
WATER UTILITY
250’-0” SETBACKFROM STREET CORNER
WATER UTILITY
10’-0” SETBACKSUGGESTED PARKING
SETBACK PER SPECIFIC PLAN
250’-0” SETBACK
N
09
:29
:09
0 FEET
M D E C : M A R C H A R B D E N T A L E D U C A T I O N A L C E N T E R
S P A T I A LM A S S I N G P L A N 1
ENTRY/RECEPTION/
WAITING
ACADEMIC
STUDENT COMMON AREA
ACADEMIC
FACULTY/STAFF
FACULTY/STAFF
FACULTY/STAFF
CLINIC BUILDINGSUPPORT
BUILDINGSUPPORT
20 40 60 80
N
09
:29
:09
0 FEET
M D E C : M A R C H A R B D E N T A L E D U C A T I O N A L C E N T E R
C O N C E P T U A L F L O O R P L A N 1
radiology
clinic support
operatory
staff/faculty
classrooms/lab
class./lab support
building support
recept./waiting
student commonareas
SERVICELOADING
20 40 60 80
N
SE
RV
ICE
LOA
DIN
GZO
NE
09
:29
:09
0 FEET
M D E C : M A R C H A R B D E N T A L E D U C A T I O N A L C E N T E R
S I T E P L A NO P T I O N B
PROPERTY LINE
SETBACKS
MASTER PLAN PROPERTY LINE10.6 ACRES
PARKING ZONE
LANDSCAPE ZONE
WATER UTILITY
250’-0” SETBACKFROM STREET CORNER
WATER UTILITY
10’-0” SETBACKSUGGESTED PARKING
SETBACK PER SPECIFIC PLAN
250’-0” SETBACK
N
09
:29
:09
0 FEET
M D E C : M A R C H A R B D E N T A L E D U C A T I O N A L C E N T E R
S P A T I A LM A S S I N G P L A N 2
ACADEMIC
CLINIC
FACULTY/STAFF
BUILDINGSUPPORT
ENTRY/RECEPTION/
WAITING
BUILDINGSUPPORT
BUILDINGSUPPORT
20 40 60 80
STUDENT COMMON AREA
N
09
:29
:09
0 FEET
M D E C : M A R C H A R B D E N T A L E D U C A T I O N A L C E N T E R
C O N C E P T U A L F L O O R P L A N 2
radiology
clinic support
operatory
staff/faculty
classrooms/lab
class./lab support
building support
recept./waiting
student commonareas
SERVICELOADINGZONE
20 40 60 80
N
09
:29
:09
0 FEET
M D E C : M A R C H A R B D E N T A L E D U C A T I O N A L C E N T E R
E X I S T I N GF L O O R P L A N
20 40 60 80
RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BUILDING AREA PROGRAM
