+ All Categories
Home > Documents > MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F....

MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F....

Date post: 24-Jan-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
43
MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIES VERTICAL TRANSPORT AND EXCHANGE OF MATERIALS IN THE UPPER WATERS OF THE OCEANS (VERTEX): INTRODUCTION TO THE PROGRAM, HYDROGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND MAJOR COMPONENT FLUXES DURING VERTEX I Moss Landing Marine Laboratories Technical Publication 83-2 by John H. MartinI George A. Knauer l William W. Broenkow l Kenneth W. Bruland 2 David M. Kar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 r'la ry W. S il ver 2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 December 1983 Moss Landing, CA 95039 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss Landing, CA 95039 2University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 3University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822 40regon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
Transcript
Page 1: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIES

VERTICAL TRANSPORT AND EXCHANGE OF MATERIALS IN THE UPPER WATERS OF THE OCEANS (VERTEX):

INTRODUCTION TO THE PROGRAM, HYDROGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND MAJOR COMPONENT FLUXES DURING VERTEX I

Moss Landing Marine Laboratories Technical Publication 83-2

by

John H. MartinI George A. Knauer l

William W. Broenkow l

Kenneth W. Bruland 2

David M. Kar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4

r'la ry W. Sil ver2

Marcia M. Gowing2

December 1983 Moss Landing, CA 95039

IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss Landing, CA 95039 2University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064

3University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822 40regon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331

Page 2: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

VERTICAL TRANSPORT AND EXCHANGE OF ~iATERIALS IN THE UPPER WATERS OF THE OCEANS (VERTEX):

INTRODUCTION TO THE PROGRAM, HYDROGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND MAJOR COMPONENT FLUXES DURING VERTEX I

by

John H. MartinI George A. Knauer l

William W. Broenkow l Kenneth W. Bruland 2

Dav id t·t Kar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4

Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2

IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss Landing, CA 95039 2University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064

3University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822 40regon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331

Page 3: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

ABSTRACT

This paper introduces VERTEX, a multi-disciplinary research program

dealing with various aspects of particle transport in the upper,

high-energy layers (0-2000 m) of the ocean. Background information is

presented on hydrography, biological composition of trapped

particulates, and major component fluxes observed on a cruise off

central California (VERTEX I). Organic C fluxes measured with two trap

systems are compared with several other estimates taken from the

literature. The intent of this overview paper is to provide a common

setting in an economical manner, and avoid undue repetition of

background and ancillary information in subsequent publications.

Page 4: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

INTRODUCTION

The mechanisms and rates of biogeochemical cycling of elements and

organic compounds in the sea and the incorporation and flux of energy

through biological compartments have interested oceanographers for

years. Indeed, cycling and flux studies of one sort or another have

involved almost every discipline of oceanography. However, the factors

responsible for controlling the distributions of elements and compounds

in oceanic water columns are poorly understood. This is especially true

when considering the role of organisms and their remains in these

cycling processes, in spite of the fact that everyone recognizes their

importance.

Within the past few years, the development of particle traps has

enabled the measurement of fluxes of materials, not only to the sea

floor, but also within various portions of the water column. Recent

advances in methodology and instrumentation have also made possible "the

accurate determination of a reasonably large suite of elements and

compounds at the very low levels at which they exist in sea water. This

combination of developments now enables oceanographers to measure rates

of change and residence times in the water column by comparing fluxes at

various depth intervals.

A group sharing mutual interests in studying these processes in the

upper "high-energy" layers (0-2000 m) of the ocean was formed in 1979.

The participants named the resea-rch program VERTEX, an acronym which

stands for vertical !ransport and exchange of materials in the upper

ocean. The overall objectives of the program are to: (1) accurately

Page 5: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

2

determine the amounts of elements and/or compounds in the water column

in both particulate and dissolved form; (2) measure the fluxes of these

elements and compounds at selected depths using particle traps; (3)

using the information gained in objectives land 2, estimate residence

times and rates of change; and (4)' understand how the transport and

exchange system works in general and in specific ocean regions.

The purpose of this paper is to introduce the VERTEX program and to

provide background information on the first cruise (VERTEX I) which took

place off central California in August-September 1980. This basic

information will provide a common setting in an economical manner for

future publications by the participants that will deal with various

aspects of the program, such as primary production and C, H, N fluxes

(Knauer and Martin, Moss Landing Marine Laboratories [MLML]),

zooplankton (Small, Oregon State University), micro-organisms (Karl,

University of Hawaii), marine snow (Silver and Gowing, University of

California at Santa Cruz [UCSCJ), hydrography and currents (Broenkow,

MLML), trace elements (Bruland, UCSC: Martin and Knauer, MLML) , natural

series radionuclides (Bruland, UCSC); transuranics (Fowler,

International Laboratory of Marine Radioactivity, Monaco), 1ipids

(Wakeham and Farrington, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution [WHOI]),

organo-nitrogen compounds (Lee, WHOI) and higher molecular weight

hydrocarbons (Risebrough, Bodega Marine Laboratory, University of

California at Berkeley).

Page 6: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

3

METHODS

Particle Traps: Two types of particle traps are used in the VERTEX

program: large (0.25 m2 ) cone-shaped traps designed by Andrew Soutar of

Scripps Institution of Oceanography (Fig. 1), and small (0.0039 m2 )

cylindrical traps designed by George Knauer of MLML (Fig. 2). The

Soutar design, funnel-shaped particle interceptor traps (PITs), consist

of a pair of teflon-coated fiberglass funnels with acrylic cod ends.

The PIT collecting surface is a cellular grid array (square openings 1

cm on a side) where particle trap interaction (rejection vs entrapment)

is believed to occur. PITs for organic material collections are of the

same design, except that the cones are teflon-coated stainless steel and

the cod ends are electro-polished stainless steel. Preservation in the

trace element/radionuclide PITs is accomplished using buffered (pH = 8)

formalin. The formalin-sodium borate solution in a 60-ml polyethylene

bottle weighted with a teflon-coated magnet is placed in the PIT cod

ends, where it slowly diffuses out through small holes in the bottle

cap. Mercuric chloride is used for preservation in the stainless steel

PITs. All interior PIT surfaces are thoroughly cleaned with either acid

or organic solvents prior to launch.

The MLML traps (Fig. 2) consist of a frame constructed of

high-impact PVC, which is fitted with 12 identical cylinders (10 = 7.0

cm; 1ength = 60 cm). The mouth of each cyl i nder has a baffl e system

consisting of 16 smaller tubes (10 = 1.3 cm; length = 5 cm). The tops

of the tubes are milled to a wall thickness of 0.06 mm to maximize open

surface area. The cylinders are made of lucite with polyethylene cod

Page 7: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

,j'

Soutar Trap centra I post

I em gridI I0.6 m flow control

1111111111111111111111111""" II /I, /I 11111111111" 1111111111" 111111 11111111111111111111/111111111111111111.11111111111111111111 lip

~rudder

~fiberglass

_____I support member

1.3 m funnel wall

~ Delrin swivel -, on clevice post

T sample collector

0.2m ~

FIG. 1. Schematic drawing of the Soutar design particle interceptor traps. Traps were deployed byBruland of UCSC and are referred to as UCSC PITs throughout the text.

1

Page 8: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

POLYPROPYLENE REMOVABLE LINE BAFFLE SYSTEM

7.0 em. TO

E u to r<>

TOPVIEW BAFFLE RETAINING

GRID SYSTEM / COLLER

E o

STABI LIZI NG RETAINING lO C\J

LANYARD CORD COLLECTION

CUP

U1o. M LML Frame b.MLML Trap Cylinder FIG. 2. Schematic drawing of the MLML traps used during VERTEX I.

Page 9: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

6

ends, except for those designed to collect materials for organa-nitrogen

compounds, which consist of glass cylinders lined with teflon bags.

The ~1LML trap cylinders are filled vJith either a NaCl solution

(Knauer, Martin) or a sucrose solution (Silver, Gowing) having a density

-3)( p = 1.05 g cm greater than that of sea water. The solution

maintains its integrity for periods of weeks, preventing significant

exchange. The density solution also retains added preservatives and

substances that dissolve from the trapped particles (e.g., Cd and P04;

Knauer and Martin, 1981). Various preservatives or tracers are added to

the gradient solutions, depending on the intended analyses or

experiments (see Table 1).

A similar flotation system is used for the two trap systems (Fig.

3). The major portion of the array·s ~Jeight is carried by submerged

glass, hard-hat floats set at depth below turbulent wave action. Both

arrays are equipped with spar buoys fitted with strobe lights and OAR

rad; 0 t ransmi tters. The ~lL~1L buoys are a1,so equ i pped v.Ji th an Argos

satellite transponder.

Both the Soutar and MLML type traps were tested during the Sediment

Trap 1ntercomparison Experinlent (ST1E; Spencer, et al., 1981), which

took place in the Panama Basin from 28 July to 1 December 1979.

Generally good agreement was obtained among the VERTEX traps and two

other trap systems, those of Honjo (Woods Hole Oceanographic

Institution) and Gardner (Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory) (Fig.

4). This agreement is remarkable in view of the fact that the traps

were of different design and size. For example, Honjo·s traps have a

1.5 m2 collecting surface in comparison to the 0.0039 m2 for the MLML

traps. The obvious loss of CaC03 in the MLML traps resulted from the

Page 10: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

7

TABLE 1. Intended analyses, preservatives used, and investigators for

the 12 MLML trap cylinders during VERTEX I.

NUTnbe r 0 f Analysis Samples Pre serva ti ve Investigator

Particle

Identification 1 Glutaraldehyde Silver

C, N, H 2 Forma1in Knauer-Martin

Trace metals 3 Formalin Knauer-Martin

ATP 2 Phosphoric acid Karl

Uptake kinetics 1 H3 adenine Karl (no preservative)

Organic nitrogen 2 Chloroform Lee

Radionuclides 1 Formalin Bruland

Page 11: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

8

spar bUoy w/strobe radio transmitter and surface floats

wave damper

su b- surface floats

PIT - 100m

PIT- 250m

PIT - 750m

PIT -1500 m

weight FIG. 3. Flotation system used for both UCSC and MLML traps during VERTEX I.

Page 12: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

Org Matter Si Iicate Carbonate

a 15 30 0 50 100 0 25 500' iii iii • • • iii iii

o e e- 0 •i 1000, •• •

~ 0 +0 0

I~

E r • 1'. t 0

1- 2000 0.. Ir • A + •OA toAI •W 0

o

3000 l 0 i· MLML 0 I 0 o WHOI e LOGO ~ SIO o lot 0

I , • ,4 000' , , , , • I , I I , •

FIG. 4. Major component fluxes (mg m- 2 day-I) measured during Sediment Trap Intercomparison \.0

Experiment by Knauer and Martin (MLML), Honjo (WHOI), Gardner (LOGO), and Soutar (SID). Figure drawn from data in Spencer, et al., 1981.

Page 13: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

10

dissolution of CaC03 in the NaCl trap solution. CaC03 is now added to

selected MLML trap cylinders to prevent this problem.

Hydrographic methods are presented in Broenkow and Greene (1981).

Nutrients were analyzed immediately after collection using an

autoanalyzer via the methods of Atlas, Gordon, Hager and Park (1971).

Biological composition methods are described in Silver and Alldredge

(1981 ) .

Page 14: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

11

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Hydrographic Data

The study area was surveyed prior to deployment of the traps (17 to

21 August 1980) using a 20-station CTO grid centered on the intended

trap launch site. Near-surface temperature and chlorophyll fluorescence

were measured via continuous surface profiles among the CTO stations.

The survey data showed a pattern typical of the late upwelling season

(Lynn 1967) with cool « 13°C) temperatures and relatively high (> 20

mg m-2) chlorophyll levels in the nearshore waters (Fig. 5). The local

center of strong upwelling is near Point Sur, and tongues of

nutrient-rich, cool, high-salinity waters have been often observed

penetrating into Monterey Bay from the south (Broenkow and Smethie,

1978 ) . The surface temperature distribution was consistent with

geostrophic flow at the surface (Fig. 6). The pre-deployment survey

showed two eddies: cyclonic flow was centered at 37°N, l23°30'W,

somewhat west of a surface temperature minimum; and an anticyclonic eddy

was centered at 35°40 ' N, 124°W in an area of warmer surface waters.

Flow between these two features was strong and onshore. To avoid the

possibility of shoreward drift, the traps were launched south of the

survey area rather than in the center of the shoreward flow, as

originally planned.

Vertical temperature, salinity and dissolved oxygen distributions

near the traps (Fig. 7) are representative of the California Current

along the central California coast. Mixed-layer depths vary seasonally

in the study area, from near zero during periods of intense upwelling

Page 15: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

12

Q)

-0 :J 37°

-+-'. ­-+-' 0

--.J

-C -+-'

L

0 z

36°

FIG.

.= .:~:.: · : : .: :.: · :.: N l '-r·a •••~ ••• - •• -. • MI ~

San ·e: e_e: . 0 , 0 20 30 40 50

Francisco -;~. -.. : I I '. I 'I 1'1 I' I I' .. - 0 30 60 90

Kilometers

Cruz\ \ ...•. +._0 .- +--

_.~

0: 14 15 ~

.tt. ·15

.. .. ..

o •••• .~....... - _. . ....0.·., .. . · . . .: ..- . -... .. .. .. . . .~..~..'{::~~:~~: .

.....:e; ·~

Morro 8ay}~• : :

West Longitude Sa. COT Stations (+) and surface temperatures (oC).

Trajectory of MLML PIT mooring shown by dashed line.

Page 16: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

13

b .::/.: ::: ~.:.:: ::: N Mn~ :~:.. :.. 0 10 2·0 30 40 50

.· .: I I 'I I ' ii' I "I .' .... 0 30 60 90 ::.: ;.. Kilometers

..-...

Q)

-0 + Cruz37° + +\::J 4-J

5.­4-J 0 . .

.--J +

...c ++4-J L <5 a . . . . .Z • + . . . .:. .. . .. .36°

++

.: :. I •• • .. ... . . .+ .: ... . .... . + .c start . . .. ..

.. ' \. : ., }., , .. ;-.:..:.:.=..­, ..- .• ".,4 • . ':.:

West Longitude

3FIG. 5b. Surface pigments (mg m- ) from in vivo fluorescence. _

-------~~---------

Page 17: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

14

. -....-... .=::.< e: : :: : ·:. : ::..

·-... -. 0 10 ... : I I I. -.. a

N. Mn~s 20 30 40 50 . '. I I I I" "

30 60 90

(1)

-0 :J

-+-J.­-+-J o

--.J 164

-C -+-J L o

Z

174=::J,,•

Kilometers

+ + +

++

.. . ... ..:e· · _. _

: :. I -. •..... . . . .: ... . .... .. .. .. . . .~. :..':\:..:.::

• :. e: •••• ....

West Longitude

FIG. 6. Dynamic height anomalies (dyn mm) surface/I500 db, and trajectory of MLML PIT mooring.

Page 18: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

.-------- Salinity (ppt) 15

32.5 33.0 33.5 34.0 34.5 35.0

-- Temperature (deg C) o 4 8 12 16 20 -------...-..........-----..------.......--.....-~---.--.........--......-----.O i

.....,0.' -"'::~.:......

00••...0•....•0...... --._"-­•• 0· ..., ..

-It

.0 .., .... " ~. ,

...... e,.

':,400 ,"'••.., ...., '\ I

" ",, \,,,

800 "'\

I,,,, I \ ,

..t: \ ,"~ ,J

~ ,,I I

,,~ 1200 , , "'\ C

, "'\,,I\

( J, \ \,,•1600 ,

"J,, ,\

2000 ~~ ~ ~--",,----,- -.a.-~

o 100 200 300 400 500 _ Oxygen (J-Lmoles/kg)

FIG 6 7. Vertical temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen, Station 28; 350 37.1 I N, 1230 40.8 I W, 31 AuguSt 1980.

Page 19: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

16

(generally in the spring and summer months) to nearly 100 m during the

winter (Eber, 1977). The 20 to 30 m mixed layer depths observed during

VERTEX I are typical of mid- to late-summer conditions. Minimum

dissolved oxygen concentrations (about 12 umo1e kg-lor 4% saturation)

were found at 750 m, and oxygen concentrations of < 10% saturation were

present between 450 and 1200 m (Fig. 7). The intrusive features shown

in the oxygen profile between 200 and 400 m are probably real (because

they were observed at several nearby stations) and result from

small-scale advective mixing processes.

Salinity distributions (Fig. 8a) show low salinity (33.2 < S <

33.7) surface waters formed in the transition zone between Pacific

Subarctic and Pacific Equatorial Waters (Sverdrup, Johnson and Fleming,

1942). An interesting feature of the salinity distribution along the

California coast is the presence of relatively high salinity "southern"

water (Wickham, 1975) which flows northward along the continental slope

in the California Countercurrent. The salinity and geostrophic flow

sections across the study area (Fig. 8) show a small subsurface salinity

maximum (S ~ 34.2) in the area of northerly flow nearshore. From spring

to fall, the California Countercurrent is generally subsurface, with its

core between 200 and 300 m (Wickham, 1975; Hickey, 1979), though

occurrences of northerly flow at the surface may be observed whenever a

favorable interplay of forces permits. McLain and Thomas (in prep.)

suggest that the surface countercurrent is caused primarily by local

onshore Ekman transport during winter, and by remote forcing due to

poleward propagation of coastal trapped waves from the tropics.

Page 20: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

17

Distance (km)

200 150 100 50 a Or------,.--------y"----=-=---:----~..---~--

0------------------33.4 ~33.6 1 :

--_.- , ..-------=-33.8 34 0 :.. ~.:.::a . ~ ..,-r•..., ~ ::.J: : ---- -- 34.1 --.........----C .:.::=:' ·

----..... 3~:2 ~ ..'.-34.2 ~ ...500 :.- ... ...E ~

..c -+-' --------34.4---­a. (1)

0 1000

34.5-­

1500 ~__""--__.....Io....-__--L.-_----':"---I.-..:.._.-.----1

'b

~ 500E ~

..c -+-' a. Q) ----- -1

0 1000

1500 a.....-__-......- ......Io--__--L__----:....:.....L.... • ----I.

FIG. 8. Transect west of Point Sur, 17-19 August 1980. (a) Sa1i ni ty.(b) Geostrophie flow (em sec-I). Northerly flow is hatched.

Page 21: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

18

The ~1LML and UCSC trap moori ngs acted as 2000 and 1500 m-long

(respectively) drift poles, and their trajectories were determined by

the water column-mean velocity. (The ratio of the submerged and exposed

surface area was 36:1 for the MLML trap line.) Both the MLML and UCSC

moorings drifted in a clockwise sense around the anticyclonic

geostrophic eddy (Figs. 6, 9). Because the MLML mooring was accurately

tracked by 70 LORAN-C fixes during the 13-day deployment, and the UCSC

array was located by only 16 such fixes, detailed current results are

available only for the MLML trap array, on which two Endeco Type 741,

neutrally-buoyant current meters were set at 150 and 1500 m. Broenkow

(1982) found good agreement between daily-mean relative currents

measured by the freely drifting meters when adjustments were made for

trap array drift and the geostrophic currents near the traps on day 8 of

the experiment. He showed that the daily mean mooring line drift rate

varied from 4.2 to 11.4 em see- l (mean 7.5 em see- l ) during the 13-day

deployment. The relative velocities as measured by the current meters

showed both tidal and inertial (20.5 hr) periodicity at 150 and 1500 m,

and relative velocities at these depths were essentially out of phase by

180°. Gardner (1980a, b) has shown that currents can affect the

performance and accuracy of certain particle interceptor traps to

accurately catch sinking particles. Relative current speed measurements

at 150 and 1500 m (PITs closest to the meters were at 100, 200 and 1400

m) showed that the instantaneous (based on a 2-minute recording

interval) maximum current speed was 21 em see-1 at 150 m and 17 em see-l r

at 1500 m. _Thirty-minute sustained maximum velocities of 18.3 and 15.2 lem see- were observed at these depths (Fig. 10). The bimodal (8 and 13

Page 22: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

19

36°00'

LORAN

UCSC -_ ... ---_ ...... start \_1

\

Q) 35°45' . 13 ~ \

\* \J \ \:J \

\

*3,.+J \ I.­-+-' t\ , --1 \

\ , 0 *\

t5 ...c

\ \ ,, .......,

L-I \11 * a \ , I

,z 35°30' , , ,

,I , '~ , ,it 7

, , ~

.....' ~

,~ ~ --. ... ­

N. Miles ~ ........---­a 5 10 15 '9

I I II i i i i

0 10 20 30 Kilometers

35°15' 124°15' 124°00' 123

0

45' 123°30'

West Longitude FIG. 9. Observed PIT positions 26 August to 8 September 1980 .

. Dashed line is UCSC mooring; solid line is MLML mooring. Numbers show interpolated daily noon positions. Adapted from Broenkow (1982).

Page 23: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

20

100

80 a ~ () c 60

150 m

Q.)

:J 0­Q) 40 L­

l.L

20

100

80 b ~ 1500 m ()

c 60 Q) :J CT Q) 40 l-

l.L

20

5 10 15 20

Mean Speed (em/sec) FIG. 10. Frequency fur 3D-min. average relative current

speeds on MLML PIT moorings, 26 August to 8 Seftember 1980. (a (b)

150 nl. 1500 m.

Page 24: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

21

cm sec- l ) frequency distribution for the 150-m depth was caused by the

water column acceleration following day 8 of the experiment (Fig. 10).

lAt 1500 m, the modal relative speed was 5 cm sec- . Mean relative

lcurrent speeds during the experiment were 9.7 and 6.0 cm sec- . In view

of these velocities and the trap designs (MLML cylinders and UCSC cones,

"both with baffles), we believe it unlikely that horizontal water

movements were significantly affecting trap accuracy, especially in

light of the fact that they were free drifting (see Staresinic, Von

Brockel, Snodlake and Clifford, 1982).

Nutrients

Nutrient profiles typical of the California Current were observed

during VERTEX I (Fig. 11). Nitrate plus nitrite and silicate

concentrations were near zero at the surface (0. 1; 3. 5 umo1 kg-1 ,

respectively), while phosphate levels were relatively high (0.5 umol

kg- l ). Typical increases with depth were observed for these nutrients;

P0 and N03 + N02 maxima coincided with the oxygen minimum (Figs. 7,4

11), while 5i02 amounts increased continuously in the 2000-m water

column. Anmonia concentrations (data not shown) were variable (0-0.9

umole kg- l ) throughout the water column, and no definite trend with

depth was observed.

Biological Composition of Trapped Particulates

Amorphous organic detritus dominated the trapped particulate

contents at all depths. Intact or readily recognizable fecal pellets

were the next most common particles. Skeletal debris as well as

apparently living organisms were also present at all depths. We now

Page 25: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

.,

P04

° N03+N02

° Si02

o

° 2 4 20 40 100 200

500

-E-IIOOO b: w o

1500

N2000 N

FIG. 11. Vertical nutrient distributions (umoles kg-I) at VERTEX I PIT site.

Page 26: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

23

describe these major classes of materials based on examination of the

samples using light and scanning electron microscopy.

Individual particles of amorphous detritus corresponded generally

to one of the two major categories described previously as IIflakes ll and

IIflocs" (Wieve and Pomeroy, 1972). The flocs,. or mucus-like aggregates,

were similar in appearance to fragments from hand-collected specimens of

marine snow, and were especially prominent in the upper 100 m, and again

between the depths of 500 and 1100 m. At the other depths, the

amorphous organic detritus was dominated by flake-like particles

resembling flattened plates or membranes.

The sources of most of the flocculent detritus were not obvious,

except for two types with distinctive mucus. One recognizable type was

produced by the diatom Thalassiosira subtilis; T. subtilis colonies were

abundant in the upper 100 m, and the mucus was found in small quantities

to the bottom trap at 2000 m (Fig. 12a). (The taxonomic designation of

T. subtilis for these specimens was confirmed by G. Fryxell.) Thick

mats of threads (Fig. 12b) surround T. subtilis cells, and the

persistence of the mucilage to depths is explained partially by the

resistance of the threads to digestion, as evidenced by their presence

within fecal pellets in the traps. A chitin-like composition may

explain the chemical hardiness of these fibrils (Hasle, 1972). A second

recognizable source of flocculent mucus was larvaceans. Larvacean

houses (together with occasional specimens of intact larvaceans)

occurred in modest numbers from the surface traps to those at 2000 m.

In contrast to the flocculent detritus, the origins of the flake-like

materials were never evident.

Page 27: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

24

.. - , ­

FIG. 12. (a) Fibrillar mat produced by Thalassiosira subtilis and T. subtilis cells from the 50-m trap;(b) Thalassiosira subtilis entwined in fibrous mucilage; (c) Skeletonema costatum, a common neritic diatom, from the 2000-m trap;(d) Strombidium sp., an oligotrich ciliate from the 2000-m trap.

Page 28: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

25

Phytop1ankton as soci ated wi th the detri tus ; nd i cated three

distinctive sources of materials in the traps. Traps from the upper 100

m contained an abundance of coccolithophores, dominated by Emiliania

huxley;, the primary coccolithophore of subarctic Pacific and north

equatorial Pacific waters, and a common species of the central North

Pacific (Okada and Honjo, 1973; Reid, 1980). The specimens of E.

huxleyi in the traps within the euphotic zone, as well as those from

greater depths, possessed coccoliths characteristic of cells from both

warm and cold water environments, mixtures we have found previously from

surface waters fo the outer California Current at this time of year.

Thalassiosira subtilis, the diatom forming mats of mucliage fibers

discussed above, was another abundant species whose presence indicated

warm oceanic water masses (Hasle, 1972). Moderate numbers of the very

large diatoms Rhizosolenia castracanei and R. imbricata var. shrubsolei

were also present in the upper traps. These diatom species occured in

i ntertwi ni ng "mats II of frus tul es in the water, associ ati ons especi ally

characteristic of oceanic, nutrient depleted regimes and water masses of

oceanic gyres (Alldredge and Silver, 1982). The combination of E.

huxleyi, and T. subtilis, and Rhizosolenia species indicates inputs of

materials to the traps from oceanic and outer California Current water

masses.

A second source of materials in the traps was indicated by the

presence of the heavily armored dinoflagellate, Ceratium dens. This

species also occurred in considerable numbers in traps from the upper

100 nl, and had been present in the Monterey Bay area for at least a

month prior to the cruise, causing a "red tide". This dinoflagellate

Page 29: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

26

species indicated a source of materials from inshore, near-surface

waters of the central California coast during conditions of nutrient

depletion that often occur after the relaxation of upwelling (Garrison,

pers. comm.). Recognizable Ceratium debris disappeared almost

immediately below lOa m, but fragments of Rhizosolenia occurred sparsely

below the epipelagic depths, and coccolith debris occurred consistently

and abundantly to the bottom trap.

At depths of 1100 m and below, a third source of material was

indicated by the presence of new phytoplankton species in the traps.

Populations that clearly were derived from communities like those in

overlying waters were also present, and thus the mixture of the

populations suggested inputs from different sources at depth. These new

populations were dominated by Skeletonema costatum (Fig. 12c), a neritic

diatom commonly characteristic of the early stages of upwelling in the

nearshore area (Garrison, 1979). Alumino-silicate fluxes increased at

these same depths '(see below), indicating lateral input of terrigenous

materials. The change in phytoplankton composition at these depths

further suggests that these materials were originally from the coastal

zone.

In addition to the skeletal and organic detritus discussed above,

many heterotrophi c protozoans, algae, and metazoans -- judged intact

with light microscopy -- occurred in the traps. Ciliates were the most

conspicuous fonms (Fig. 12d) among the protozoans, but flagellates

(including non-pigmented, naked dinoflagellates) were also moderately

abundant. Most of the algae within the detritus were either in advanced

stages of decomposi ti on or cons; sted of empty-wa11 ed spec;mens, but

Page 30: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

27

occasional specimens showed autofluorescence, indicating the presence of

intact protoplasts with pigment.

Metazoans were present in all the traps, and were most abundant in

the 50 to 200 m traps. In sediment traps, such organisms are usually

interpreted as being II swimners" (Knauer, et al., 1979), forms that swam

into the traps on their own. However, it is probable that some of

these, particularly the smaller forms, were associated with the detrital

debris that sank into the traps, and were part of detrital food chains . . Copepods were the most common swinmers in our samples, followed by

ostracods and copepod naup1i i • La rvaceans, gymnosomatous pteropods,

polychaetes, hydrozoan jellies (including siphonophores), amphipods, and

chaetognaths occurred in lower numbers.

The larvaceans are a particularly interesting group of "swirrmers",

because they bring with them their mucous houses', which are one of the

most readily recognized forms of floc or marine snow. Because

larvaceans are almost constantly in their houses as protection from

predators (Alldredge, 1976), the larvaceans may actually inject this

form of "detritus" when they swim into the traps. Larvacean houses were

not numerous relative to other forms of detritus, and thus would not

have introduced a significant amount of material into the traps during

VERTEX I.

Major Component Fluxes

Major component fluxes estimated using the two trap systems are

shown in Fig. 13 and Table 20 Total mass fluxes were similar at 80-100

Page 31: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

~

!/

I' Total Part Org Matter CaC03 AI-Si

o 400 8000· 200 400 0 40 80 0 20 40 o

500

~ LV\ E

-......,

I 1000 f­a. w 0

1500

.LV\ .l- I" .I­ 0

2000

FIG. 13. Major component fluxes (mg m­ 2 day-I) measured with MLML squares) trap systems during VERTEX I.

(filled squares) and UCSC (open ~

Page 32: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

29

TABLE 2. VERTEX I major component fluxes measured with MLML and UCSC

traps. Organic matter, CaC03 and alumino-silicate fluxes

were estimated by multiplying organic C values by 2, Ca

values by 2.5, and Al quantities by 12.

Depth Total Org. Mat. CaC03 A1-Si

(m) ------------------mg -2

m -1

day --------------- ­

50 720 440 89 3.3

80* 300 190 57 0.84

100 210 130 53 1.9

200 160 88 53 8.5

250* 260 150 63 5.3

300 120 63 39 14

500 110 48 41 21

600 120 45 43 29

700 120 33 24 33

750* 86 18 33 15

900 150 61 26 43

1100 150 45 30 46

1700 100 30 29 39

2000 97 31 18 37

*ucsc traps.

Page 33: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

30

m and 700-750 m, while the UCSC trap flux was about 2X higher than the

MLML trap flux in the 200-300 m depth interval.

Organic matter fluxes were estimated by doubling the organic C

flux. Good agreement was obtained between the two trap systems, with

the exception of the 200-300 m depth interval, where the UCSC trap flux

was about twice as high as the trend observed with the MLML traps. This

may have resulted from incomplete removal of zooplankton which actively

swam into the UCSC traps, or because of poor replication in the MLML C

values at 100 and 200 m. Similar calcium carbonate fluxes were obtained

wi th the two trap systems!t The 1argest di screpancy was observed for

alumino-silicate fluxes, estimated by multiplying the Al values by 12.1,

based on Taylor's (1964) crustal abundance estimate for this element

(8.23%). The MLML traps yielded fluxes about twice as high as those

obtained by UCSC. At the present time, it is unknown whether

overtrapping by MLML or undertrapping by UCSC is involved. Certainly

the trapping of rarer larger particles is not involved because the

probability of catching these particles in the MLML traps would be 64X

less than in the UCSC traps based on collecting area (0.0039 vs 0.25

m2 ). The difference in alumino-silicate fluxes might be due to the fact

that the MLML trap samples were concentrated via filtration, while the

UCSC PIT materials were concentrated via centrifugation. If significant

amounts of Al were associated with fine clay particles, it ;s possible

that they were not concentrated via the latter technique. Nevertheless,

the overall agreement between the two trap systems ;s quite good ;n view

of their different sizes and geometries, the fact that this was the

first time they were compared in the free-floating mode in the

Page 34: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

31

California Current, and that different trap sample processing methods

were emp 1oyed.

Our VERTEX I organic C fluxes are compared with other estimates

made in the Atlantic and Pacific (Fig. 14). To simplify this task, we

did not include fluxes measured in the upper 300 m of the water column

(e.g., Staresinic, Rowe, Shaughnessey and Williams, 1978; Zeitzschel and

Zenk, 1978; Tsunogai, Uenatsu, Taneka and Harade, 1980; Sasaki and

Nishizawa, 1981; Staresinic, et al, 1982), nor those measured in bays

and enclosed basins (e.g., Bishop, Ketten and Edmond, 1978; Knauer et

al., 1979; Crisp, Brenner, Venatesan, Ruth and Kaplan, 1979; Dunbar and

Berger, 1981).

The data shown in Fig. 14 can be summarized as follows: Fluxes in

the 300-1500 m portion of the water column range from 0.1 to 2.6 mmol C

2- day-:. 1 l' · d·

near-shore waters and lowest in oligotrophic open-ocean areas. The same

applies to the 1500-4000 m depth interval, except that maximum fluxes

are only half as high (1.3 mmol C m-2 day-I). Available flux estimates

for the 4000-6000 m portion of the water column are very low, on the

order of 0.05 to 0.2 mmol C m-2 day-I. This summary is similar to that

compiled by Suess (1980).

It appears that there is order of magnitude agreement in near-shore

and open ocean C flux estimates. Hopefully, agreement will improve as

more is learned about the physics governing the entrapment of particles,

and the chemistry and biology occurring within the traps themselves.

m ... As expected, f uxes are genera .IY hi ghest 1n pro uctlve

Page 35: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

32

FIG. 14. A comparison of VERTEX I organic C fluxes with previously pUblished Pacific and Atlantic Oceans estimates. Data for upper 300 m of water column plus those for bays, basins, etc. are not included.

Legend Key:(1) This paper, central California

A = MLML trapsB = UCSC traps

(2) Knauer, et ale (1979), northeast Pacific open ocean (3) Honjo (1980)

A = central Sargasso Sea B = tropical Atlantic C = north central Pacific

(4) Spencer, et ale (1981), Honjo STIE data, Panama (5) Honjo (1978), Sargasso Sea (6) Deuser and Ross (1980), Deuser, et ale (1981),

Sargasso Sea, bar = seasonal range (7) Rowe and Gardner (1979), northwest Atlantic Ocean (8) Hinga, et ale (1979), north Atlantic deep-sea floor (9) Martin and Knauer (1982) equatorial north Pacific

(10) Bishop, et ale (1977), equatorial Atlantic (11) Bishop, et ale (1980), Panama basin (12) Cobler and Dymond (1980), Galapagos (13) Wiebe, et ale (1976), Bahamas

Page 36: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

33

. mmol m-2 day-I oO,......__r-I __~2r=--_~3p:..-._~4 ,

~ <]v () .~ . ••

o~ etL}I <)<1 0

~

~IA2 'I ~

-IS &2E

~ + o 3A ~

t;i ~ 383 • • 3C ~40

(;i C>5 ~ HD6

~7

08 09 EBIO () II +12 <V13

6..-.--....I.---......L-----L----'

Page 37: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

34

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Andrew Soutar of Scripps Institution of Oceanography for

the schematic shown in Fig. 1. This research was supported by grants

from the National Science Foundation Marine Chemistry and Biological

Oceanography Programs (aCE #s 79-23321, 79-23322, 79-26797, 80-03200,

and 80-05180).

Page 38: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

35

REFERENCES

ALLDREDGE, A.L. (1976) Field behavior and adaptive strategies of

Appendicularians (Chordata: Tunicata). Marine Biology 38, 29-39.

ALLDREDGE, A.L. and M.W. SILVER. (1982) Abundance and production rates

of floating diatom mats (Rhizosolenia castracanei and~. imbricata

yare shrubsolei) in the Eastern Pacific Ocean. Marine Biology 66,

83-88.

ATLAS, E.l., l.I. GORDON, S.W. HAGER and P.K. PARK. (1971) A practical

manual for use of the Technicon autoanalyzer in seawater nutrient

analyses (revised). Tech. Rept. 215, Ref. 71-22, Oregon State

University School of Oceanography. 48 p.

BISHOP, J.K.B., J.M. EDMOND, D.R. KETTEN, M.P. BACON and W.B. SIlKER.

(1977) The chemistry, biology and vertical flux of particulate

matter from the upper 400 m of the equatorial Atlantic Ocean.

Deep-Sea Research 24,511-548.

BISHOP, J.K.B., D.R. KETTEN and J.M. EDMOND. 1978. The chemistry, bio­

logy and ve~tical flux of particulate matter from the upper 400 m

of the Cape Basin in the southeast Atlantic Ocean. Deep-Sea

Research 25,1121-1162.

BISHOP, J.K.B., R.W. COLLIER, D.R. KETTENS and J.M. EDMOND. (1980) The

chemistry, biology and vertical flux of particulate matter from the

upper 1500 m of the Panama Basin. Deep-Sea Research 27,615-640.

BROENKOW, W.W. (1982) A comparison between geostrophic and current­

meter observations in a California Current eddy. Deep-Sea

Research 29,1303-1311.

Page 39: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

36

BROENKOW, W.W. and W.M. SMETHIE, JR. (1978) Surface circulation and

replacement of water in Monterey Bay. Estuarine and Coastal

Marine Science 6, 583-603.

BROENKOW, W.W. and N. GREENE. (1981) Oceanographic results during

VERTEX particle interceptor trap experiment, 17 August to 8 Septem­

ber 1980. Moss Landing Marine Laboratories Tech. Pub1. 81-1. Moss

Landing, CA. 109 p.

COBLER, R. and J. DYMOND. (1980) Sediment trap experiment on the Gala­

pagos spreading center, equatorial Pacific. Science 209, 801-803.

CRISP, P.T., S. BRENNER, M.I. VENTAKESAN, E. RUTH and I.R. KAPLAN.

(1979) Organic chemical characterization of sediment-trap particu~

lates from San Nicholas, Santa Barbara, Santa Monica, and San

Pedro Basins, California. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 43,

1791-1801.

DEUSER, W.G. and E.H. ROSS. (1980) Seasonal change in the flux of or­

ganic carbon to the deep Sargasso Sea. Nature 283, 364-365.

DEUSER, W.G., E.H. ROSS and R.F. ANDERSON. (1981) Seasonality in the

supply ~f sediment to the deep Sargasso Sea and implications for

the rapid transfer of matter to the deep ocean. Deep-Sea Research

28A, 495-505.

DUNBAR, R.B. and W.H. BERGER. (1981) Fecal pellet flux to modern

bottom sediment of Santa Barbara Basin (California) based on sedi~

ment trapping. Geological Society of America Bulletin 92, 212-218.

Page 40: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

37

I:BER, L.E. (1977) Contoured depth-time charts (0 to 200 m, 1950 to

1966) of temperature, salinity, oxygen and sigma-t at 23 CalCOFI

stations in the California Current. California Cooperative Oceanic

Fisheries Investigations Atlas No. 25. 231 p.

GARDNER, W.O. (1980a) Sediment trap dynamics and calibration: a labo­

ratory evaluation. Journal of Marine Research 38, 17-40.

GARDNER, W.O. (1980b) Field assessment of sediment traps. Journal of

Marine Research 38, 41-52.

GARRISON, D.l. (1979) Monterey Bay phytoplankton. I. Seasonal cycles

of phytoplankton assemblages. Journal of Plankton Research 1,

241-265.

HASlE, G.R. (1972) Thalassiosira subtilis (Bacillariophyceae) and two

allied species. Norwegian Journal of Botany 19, 111-137.

HICKEY, S.M. (1979) The California Current system: hypothesis and

facts. Progress in Oceanography 8, 191-279.

HINGA, K.R., J. MC N°. SIEBURTH and G.R. HEATH. (1979) The supply and

use of organic material at the deep-sea floor. Journal of Marine

Research 37,557-579.

HONJO, S. (1978) Sedimentation of materials in the Sargasso Sea at a

5367 m deep station. Journal of Marine Research 36, 469-492.

HONJO, S. (1980) Material fluxes and modes of sedimentation in the

mesopelagic and bathypelagic zones. Journal of Marine Research

38, 53-97.

HONJO, S., D.W. SPENCER and J.W. FARRINGTON. (1982) Deep advection

transport of lithogenic particles in Panama Basin. Science 216,

516-518.

Page 41: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

38

Page 42: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

Page 43: MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIESaquaticcommons.org/1507/1/MLML_Tech_Pub_83-2.pdfKar1 3 Lawrence F. Smal1 4 Mary W. Silver2 Marcia M. Gowing 2 IMoss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss

40

WICKHAM, J.B. (1975) Observations of the California Countercurrent.

Journal of Marine Research 33, 325-340.

WIEBE, W.J. and L.R. POMEROY. (1972) Microorganisms and their associa­

tion with aggregates and detritus in the sea: A microscopic study.

Memorie dell· Instituto Italiano ~ Idrobiologia 29 (supplement),

325-352.

WIEBE, P.H., S.H. BOYD and C. WINGET. (1976) Particulate matter sink­

ing to the deep-sea floor at 2000 m in the Tongue-of-the-Ocean,

Bahamas, with a description of a new sedimentation trap. Journal

of Marine Research 34, 341-354.


Recommended