+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Motion for Preliminary Injuction

Motion for Preliminary Injuction

Date post: 06-Jul-2018
Category:
Upload: statesman-journal
View: 219 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 17

Transcript
  • 8/17/2019 Motion for Preliminary Injuction

    1/17

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    PAGE 1 – PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

    INJUNCTION

    VIAL FOTHERINGHAM LLP17355 SW Boones Ferry Rd., Suite A

    Lake Oswego, OR 97035Phone: 503-684-4111

    Fax: 503-598-7798P14722-003

    IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

    FOR THE COUNTY OF MARION

    Civil Department

    CREEKSIDE HOMEOWNERSASSOCIATION, INC., an Oregon non-profitcorporation,

    Plaintiff,

    v.

    CREEKSIDE GOLF COURSE, LLC, anOregon limited liability company, d/b/aCREEKSIDE GOLF CLUB; CREEKSIDEGOLF OPERATIONS, LLC, also d/b/aCREEKSIDE GOLF CLUB,

    Defendants.

    )))))))))))))))))

    Case No. 16CV13722

    PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FORPRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

    Filing Fee of $100 per ORS 21.200(1)(e)

    Pursuant to ORCP 79, Plaintiff Creekside Homeowners Association, Inc., moves the

    Court for a preliminary injunction restraining Defendants Creekside Golf Club, LLC and

    Creekside Golf Operations, LLC dba Creekside Golf Club from:

    (a) Failing to maintain and water the Course, including the 18-holes of

    fairways, greens, tee-boxes and the driving range site; 

    (b) Seeking any lot-line adjustments or subdivision to remove parcels from

    the Course;

    (c) Making any land use applications to alter the use of parcels located within

    the Course;

    (d) Tearing out the driving range, fairways, greens, tee-boxes, or any other

     portion of the Course;

    (e) Conducting any development or construction of residential lots upon

    fairways and greens, or upon the driving range;

    4/26/2016 3:06:05 PM

    16CV13722

  • 8/17/2019 Motion for Preliminary Injuction

    2/17

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    PAGE 2 – PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

    INJUNCTION

    VIAL FOTHERINGHAM LLP17355 SW Boones Ferry Rd., Suite A

    Lake Oswego, OR 97035Phone: 503-684-4111

    Fax: 503-598-7798P14722-003

    (f) Failing to water fairways, tee-boxes and greens #1 through #18;

    (g) Allowing the Course to fall into disrepair;

    (h) Ceasing operation of the 18-hole Course; and

    (i) Such other relief as is equitable and just.

    This Motion is supported by the following Points and Authorities.

    POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

    1. 

    Facts

    The Golf Course Estates at Creekside is a residential planned unit development (“PUD,”

    “Community,” or “Creekside”) located in Marion County, Oregon. The Community has been,

    and continues to be, developed in several phases. The property within the Community is subject

    to covenants, conditions, and restrictions, beginning with the recording of the Declaration of

    Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of Golf Course Estates at Creekside on August 26, 1992,

    on Reel 982, Page 273, in the records of Marion County, Oregon.

    Plaintiff Creekside Homeowners Association, Inc. ("Association") is an Oregon non-

     profit corporation. The Association was created to serve as the means through which owners of

    living units in the Community may take action with regard to the administration, management

    and operation of the Community. Membership in the Association is mandatory for every owner

    of a living unit within the Community. (Decl., Art. X, Sect. 1). Creekside PUD consists of 16

    separate platted phases, and 2 re-plats of portions of two prior phases. At present, there are 588

    developed single family homes located within all 18 of these plats within the Association.

    Development within some of the later phases continues.

    The operation of the Association is governed by the provisions of the Declaration,

    Bylaws of Golf Course Estates at Creekside Homeowners Association, Inc., (“Bylaws”), Articles

    of Incorporation of Golf Course Estates at Creekside Homeowners Association, Inc. (“Articles”),

    and the Oregon Planned Community Act, ORS 94.550 to 94.783. The Bylaws were recorded on

  • 8/17/2019 Motion for Preliminary Injuction

    3/17

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    PAGE 3 – PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

    INJUNCTION

    VIAL FOTHERINGHAM LLP17355 SW Boones Ferry Rd., Suite A

    Lake Oswego, OR 97035Phone: 503-684-4111

    Fax: 503-598-7798P14722-003

    August 26, 1992, on Reel 982, Page 272. The Articles were filed with the Oregon Secretary of

    State’s office on August 26, 1992. 

    According to the Declaration, the Association was “organized to provide for the

     preservation and architectural control of the property, the maintenance of the common property

    and to promote the health, safety and welfare of the owners and occupants of the property.”

    (Decl. Art. IX, Sect. 1). Pursuant to the Declaration and the Oregon Planned Community Act,

    the Association is authorized to enforce the provisions of the Declaration, Bylaws and rules and

    regulations of the Association. (Decl. Art. XII, Sect. 2; Decl. Art. XV, Sect. 2); ORS

    94.630(1)(e), 94.777-780. Furthermore, the Association is authorized to initiate litigation

     pursuant to in matters that affect the common interest of the owners or the Community. (Decl.,

    Art. XII, Sect. 2; Decl. Art. XV, Sect. 2; Bylaws, Art. V); ORS 94.630(1)(e), 94.777-780.

    The Creekside Golf Course is an 18-hole, championship golf course located within the

    geographic boundaries of the Community. The property comprising the golf course consists of

    an 18-hole golf course, including fairways, greens, tee-boxes, and cart paths; practice putting

    green and chipping area; driving range; clubhouse; parking area; and maintenance and service

     buildings, (collectively, the “Course”). The Course adjoins and is interspersed among the

    residential lots in the Community.

    The Creekside Golf Course real property has at all relevant times been owned and

    operated by the Creekside PUD developer, its successors-in-interest, and now, the Defendants,

    and is further contained within the legal description attached hereto as "Exhibit A" to be

    incorporated herein by this reference. Defendant Creekside Golf Course, LLC, dba Creekside

    Golf Club (“CGC”), owns the Course. Defendant Creekside Golf Operations, LLC, is the

    current operator of the golf course. Creekside Golf Operations, LLC also does business as or

  • 8/17/2019 Motion for Preliminary Injuction

    4/17

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    PAGE 4 – PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

    INJUNCTION

    VIAL FOTHERINGHAM LLP17355 SW Boones Ferry Rd., Suite A

    Lake Oswego, OR 97035Phone: 503-684-4111

    Fax: 503-598-7798P14722-003

    otherwise holds itself out as Creekside Golf Club. Together with Creekside Golf Course, LLC,

    Creekside Golf Operations, LLC operates the golf course. 

    The Course was a key selling point for the lots within the community, and induced

    Association members to purchase homes at Creekside. CGC and its predecessor in interest,

    represented, promised, developed and sold lots in the PUD to association members as the

    "emerald splendor of the Willamette'' and an “18-hole golf course” having as amenities the use,

    views and common benefits of residing adjacent to, and interspersed with a high quality golf

    course, views and open space, which enhanced the quality and livability for Association

    members in the PUD.

    Defendants claim that they are unable to operate the Course profitably. Defendants have

    tried various methods to shift the problem of the Course’s lack of profitability to the

    Association. They have told the Association’s representative that, unless the Association agrees

    to cover the shortfall in golf course operations by either purchasing the Course or otherwise

    subsidizing the Course, CGC will close the Course on April 30, 2016. Neither the board of

    directors nor the Association members have agreed to any of the Defendants’ plans for shifting

    operational shortfall to the Association or its members. Without court intervention, the Course

    will close April 30, 2016.

    Additionally, CGC representatives have told the Association and public their intention to

    develop the Course to create new home sites. Specifically, CGC applied to subdivide a portion

    of hole no. 14 for additional single-family home sites, although that application was later

    withdrawn.

    The Association has filed a Complaint with this Court, alleging four Claims for Relief:

    (1) declaratory judgment, (2) anticipatory breach of covenant, (3) quiet title, and (4) waste and

  • 8/17/2019 Motion for Preliminary Injuction

    5/17

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    PAGE 5 – PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

    INJUNCTION

    VIAL FOTHERINGHAM LLP17355 SW Boones Ferry Rd., Suite A

    Lake Oswego, OR 97035Phone: 503-684-4111

    Fax: 503-598-7798P14722-003

     permanent injunction. The Association’s breach of covenant and declaratory judgment claims

    are based on its CC&Rs, which prohibit CGC from changing the boundaries of the Course and

    require CGC to reasonably maintain the golf course in good condition. The Association also

    claims an equitable servitude in the Course based upon representations by CGC’s predecessor-

    in-interest that Association members were purchasing property in a high-end golf course

    community.

    2. Authority for Issuance of I njunction

    Pursuant to ORCP 79 A(1):

    Subject to the requirements of Rule 82 A(1), a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction may be allowed under this rule:

    A(1)(a) When it appears that a party is entitled to relief demanded in a pleading,and such relief, or any part thereof, consists of restraining the commission orcontinuance of some act, the commission or continuance of which during thelitigation would produce injury to the party seeking the relief; or

    A(1)(b) When it appears that the party against whom a judgment is sought isdoing or threatens, or is about to do, or is procuring or suffering to be done, someact in violation of the rights of a party seeking judgment concerning the subject

    matter of the action, and tending to render the judgment ineffectual.

    A preliminary injunction may be allowed at any time after commencement of the action and

     before judgment upon at least five days’ notice of the hearing. ORCP 79(A)(2) and (C)(1).

    In Oregon Educ. Ass’n v. Oregon Taxpayers United PAC, 227 Or App 37, 45 (2009), the

    Oregon Court of Appeals explained that under ORCP 79:

    [A] preliminary injunction is to preserve the status quo so that, upon the final hearing,

    full relief may be granted. State ex v. Mart , 135 Or 603, 613, 295 P 459 (1931); see alsoState ex rel. McKenley Automotive v. Oldham, 283 Or 511, 515 n 3, 584 P2d 741(1978)(describing function of preliminary injunction as protection of status quo). Thus, ahearing on whether a preliminary injunction should issue is not a hearing on the merits, see Fleming,  Administrator v. Woodward , 180 or 486, 488, 177 P2d 428 (1947), but ismerely to determine whether the party seeking the injunction has made a sufficientshowing to warrant the preservation of the status quo unit the later hearing on the merits.See American Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. Ferguson, 66 Or 417, 420, 134 P 1029 (1913).

  • 8/17/2019 Motion for Preliminary Injuction

    6/17

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    PAGE 6 – PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

    INJUNCTION

    VIAL FOTHERINGHAM LLP17355 SW Boones Ferry Rd., Suite A

    Lake Oswego, OR 97035Phone: 503-684-4111

    Fax: 503-598-7798P14722-003

    A preliminary injunction is appropriate to halt out-of-compliance behavior or

    construction and prevent immediate irreparable injury, loss, and damage to a homeowners

    association and its members. See, e.g., Conifer Ridge Homeowners Ass’n v. Hayworth, 176 Ore

    App 603 (2001). There must be an “appreciable threat of continuing harm.”  LeVasseur v.

     Armon, 240 Ore App 250, 259 (2010) (internal citations omitted).

    ORCP 82 A(1) requires that, prior to the issuance of a preliminary injunction, the

    Plaintiff provide security in the amount deemed by the court as proper. ORCP 82(A)(1)(a).

    “[T]he purpose of a bond or other the security is to protect the party enjoined from damages that

    occur because of the wrongful entry of the preliminary injunction.” Or. Educ. Ass’n v. Or.

    Taxpayers United PAC, 227 Or App 37, 45 (2009) (citing Kern v. Gentner , 176 Or 479 (1945)).

    ARGUMENT

    The Court must enjoin Defendants from closing the Course. The Association is entitled to

    a preliminary injunction under both ORCP 79A(1)(a) and ORCP 79A(1)(b). First, the

    Association is entitled to prevail on its claims, and likely will do so. Second, allowing

    Defendants to undertake their threatened action during the pendency of litigation would result in

    irreparable harm to the Association, and that harm would render the judgment ineffectual.

    1.  The Association is li kely to prevail on i ts claims.

    The Association is entitled to a preliminary injunction under Subsection (a) because it is

    likely to prevail on the merits, and the continuance of Defendants’ conduct will cause damage to

    the Association during the litigation.

    a.   Breach of Covenant

    The Association is likely to prevail on the merits on its breach of covenant claims. Courts

    interpret restrictive covenants in the same manner as any other contractual provision. Yogman v.

  • 8/17/2019 Motion for Preliminary Injuction

    7/17

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    PAGE 7 – PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

    INJUNCTION

    VIAL FOTHERINGHAM LLP17355 SW Boones Ferry Rd., Suite A

    Lake Oswego, OR 97035Phone: 503-684-4111

    Fax: 503-598-7798P14722-003

     Parrott , 325 Or 358, 361 (1997). “First, the court examines the text of the disputed provision, in

    the context of the document as a whole. If the provision is clear, the analysis ends.”  Id . In this

    case, the covenants are clear and they unambiguously entitle the Association to the requested

    relief. No further interpretation is therefore necessary, and the Court should grant the

    Association’s motion.

    The Declaration places a number of obligations on CGC with respect to the Course.

    First, Article III, Section 4 of the Declaration requires CGC to maintain the Course:

    The maintenance, upkeep and repair of all out-of-bounds areas within the golf course,shall be the sole responsibility of the golf course owner.

    Second, Article VII, Section 3 of the Declaration provides that Creekside Golf may not change

    the boundaries of the Golf Course:

    The Declarant shall have the right to design, layout and construct the golf course andrelated facilities upon those portions of the property described in Exhibit A which are notwithin the Property in such manner as may be elected by the Declarant and any successorin interest thereto; and thereafter, the owner of the golf course and related facilities shallhave the right to modify, expand or contract the layout of the golf course and to modify,expand, contract, eliminate, construct or move the location of any related facility, fromtime to time: provided, however, that no such modif ication or change shal l alter the

    boundary li nes of any portion of the property .

    (Decl. Art. VII, Sect. 3)( Emphasis added ). Finally, Article VII, Section 4 of the Declaration

    requires CGC to maintain the course in good condition:

    Golf Course Owner's Obligations. The owner of the golf course shall be obligated toreasonably main tain  the appearance of the golf course and related facilities, and toreasonably maintain any streams, ponds or lakes on the golf course so as to deter thereproduction of mosquitoes and other noxious insects.

    (Decl. Art. VII, Sect. 4)( Emphasis added ).

    Contrary to, and in direct violation of these requirements, CGC has indicated that it is

    closing the Course on April 30, 2016, and thereafter, will not maintain the appearance of the golf

    course, the out-of-bounds areas, streams, ponds or lakes. CGC has further stated that it intends

  • 8/17/2019 Motion for Preliminary Injuction

    8/17

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    PAGE 8 – PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

    INJUNCTION

    VIAL FOTHERINGHAM LLP17355 SW Boones Ferry Rd., Suite A

    Lake Oswego, OR 97035Phone: 503-684-4111

    Fax: 503-598-7798P14722-003

    to let its staff go and to sell the property to a real estate developer. CGC’s asserted position is in

    direct violation of Article III, Section 4 and Article VII, Section 4 of the Declaration. A closed,

    unstaffed, golf course is not a reasonably maintained golf course.

    Additionally, as stated above, CGC has indicated that it plans on developing portions of

    the golf course into a residential neighborhood. CGC’s most immediate plan has been to develop

    homes on the fairway of hole no. 14. CGC has already pursued a subdivision application to

    develop the fairway of hole no. 14 with the City of Salem and, after having the application

    denied, had appealed the decision to the Planning Commission. Though the appeal has since

     been withdrawn, CGC’s actions demonstrate its intent to develop property within the Course into

    residential homes in contradiction to the direct violation of Article VII, Section 2 of the

    Declaration, which prohibits alterations to the Course boundaries.

    CGC’s plans to close the Course in order to develop the Course property into a new

    residential neighborhood is such an obvious violation of its obligations under the Declaration, the

    Association will prevail on the merits of its breach of covenant claims.

    b. 

     Equitable Servitude

    The Association is also likely to prevail on its claim for an equitable servitude. In

     Mountain High Homeowners Ass’n v. J. L. Ward Constr. Co., 228 Or App 424 ( 2009), the

    Oregon Court of Appeals acknowledged a homeowners association’s right to an equitable

    servitude when the developer makes representations about the nature of the community, which

    are foreseeably relied upon by the purchasers within that community. In Mountain  High, the

    subdivision was marketed to prospective purchases as a golf course community. The golf course

    was supposed to be an enhancement to the value of the homes, and was essential to the

     purchasers’ decision to purchase homes in the community. The developer wished to develop

  • 8/17/2019 Motion for Preliminary Injuction

    9/17

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    PAGE 9 – PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

    INJUNCTION

    VIAL FOTHERINGHAM LLP17355 SW Boones Ferry Rd., Suite A

    Lake Oswego, OR 97035Phone: 503-684-4111

    Fax: 503-598-7798P14722-003

    some of the golf holes into homes, but the Court of Appeals held that the homeowners

    association has established an equitable servitude over the course. In so doing, it adopted

    Restatement of Servitudes 2.10 which sets out a 5 factor test for establishing an equitable

    servitude by estoppel:

    An equitable servitude by estoppel may be created as the result of (1) either express orimplied representation made under circumstances where (2) it is reasonably foreseeablethat the person to whom the representation is made will rely on it, (3) that the person doesso rely, (4) such reliance is reasonable, and (5) the establishment of a servitude isnecessary to avoid injustice.

     Id. at 438. In Mountain  High, the defendants’ representations that the community would continue

    as a golf course community and the buyers’ reasonable reliance upon those representations were

    enough to uphold the trial court’s determination that an equitable servitude had been created in

    favor of the owners.

    With one exception, Mountain High cannot be distinguished from the present case. The

    only significant difference is that, in Mountain High, the developer had already closed the golf

    course, so the court ordered the developer to reopen the course. This case meets all the factual

    and legal elements for an equitable servitude set out in Mountain High. The Association will

     present evidence that CDC’s predecessor -in-interest sold homes, which were advertised as part

    of the “emerald splendor of the Willamette” and an “18-hole golf community” and that the

     purchasers of those homes reasonable relied upon these and other representations when deciding

    to purchase. As such, the owners by and through the Association are entitled to an equitable

    servitude preventing the suspension of operation of the Course or development of the Course.

    2. 

    The Association wi ll be ir reparably inj ur ed if Defendants are not enjoined.

    A preliminary injunction is required to prevent irreparable harm to the Association.

    Irreparable injury is one that “cannot receive reasonable or complete redress in a court of law.”

  • 8/17/2019 Motion for Preliminary Injuction

    10/17

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    PAGE 10 – PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

    INJUNCTION

    VIAL FOTHERINGHAM LLP17355 SW Boones Ferry Rd., Suite A

    Lake Oswego, OR 97035Phone: 503-684-4111

    Fax: 503-598-7798P14722-003

     Bergerson v. Salem-Keizer Sch. Dist., 185 Ore App 649, 660 (2003) (citing Arlington Sch. Dist.

     No. 3 v. Arlington Ed. Assoc., 184 Ore App 97, 55 P3d 546 (2002)).

    As detailed above, CGC has threatened to shut down the golf course as of April 30, 2016.

    Furthermore, CGC is attempting to develop the golf course holes. Both actions will result in

    irreparable injury to the Association. The shutdown of the course would immediately interrupt

     play on the course and reduce the value of the homes within the Community. Additionally, once

    the Course falls into disrepair, it cannot be reasonably restored to operational order without the

    expenditure of considerable funds. Any development of the golf course holes will also result in

    the expenditure of considerable money for work which cannot be legally performed and will be

    undone by the Court’s order in the Association’s favor at the end of the case. Both the shutdown

    and the Course development will irreparably injure the Association and owners such that there is

    no adequate remedy at law for the Association and the threat of immediate harm is continuing.

    3. Bond or other securi ty

    ORCP 82 provides:

     No restraining order or preliminary injunction shall issue except upon the givingof security by the applicant, in such sum as the court deems proper, for the payment of such costs, damages, and attorney fees as may be incurred or suffered by any party who is found to have been wrongfully enjoined or restrained.

    As such, the Court should require a bond in the sum deemed proper by the Court. The

    Association offers that the alleged economic shortfall of $150,000.00 is an appropriate

    ceiling for the amount of the bond. 

    CONCLUSION

    Defendants threaten to suspend maintenance of the golf course and development of the

    hole no. 14 in violation of the covenants and the Association’s equitable servitude. The

    threatened suspension of operation of the golf course and development of the holes will cause

  • 8/17/2019 Motion for Preliminary Injuction

    11/17

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    PAGE 11 – PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

    INJUNCTION

    VIAL FOTHERINGHAM LLP17355 SW Boones Ferry Rd., Suite A

    Lake Oswego, OR 97035Phone: 503-684-4111

    Fax: 503-598-7798P14722-003

    irreparable harm to the Association and its members, for which there is no adequate remedy at

    law. For the reasons explained above, the Court must enjoin Defendants’ conduct pending trial

    on the merits. The Court must order Defendants to continue to operate the course in its current

    condition, with all its present amenities, pending trial on the merits.

    Dated this 26th day of April, 2016. VIAL FOTHERINGHAM LLP

    /s/ T. Beau EllisT. Beau Ellis, OSB #093437Christopher M. Tingey, OSB # 01432617355 SW Boones Ferry Road, Suite ALake Oswego, OR 97035T: (503) 684-4111

    F: (503) 598-7758E: [email protected]: [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff

    Trial Attorney(s):T. Beau Ellis, OSB #093437Christopher M. Tingey, OSB # 014326

  • 8/17/2019 Motion for Preliminary Injuction

    12/17

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    PAGE 12 – PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

    INJUNCTION

    VIAL FOTHERINGHAM LLP17355 SW Boones Ferry Rd., Suite A

    Lake Oswego, OR 97035Phone: 503-684-4111

    Fax: 503-598-7798P14722-003

    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

    I hereby certify that on the below date, I served a true and correct copy of the below

    stated document on the below stated persons, using the below stated method of service.

    Mail  by first-class mail, postage prepaid to the last known address of the personsidentified below;

    Fax  by facsimile transmission to the last known facsimile of the persons identified below;

    E-Filing  by electronic filing with the Oregon Judicial Department File and Serve;

    E-mail  by electronic mail to the last known e-mail address of the persons identified below, and if sent by electronic mail only, under agreement pursuant to ORCP 9.

     Name/Address Relationship Manner of Service 

    Mark Shipman, OSB #931041Saalfeld Griggs PCPO Box 470Salem, Oregon 97308

     Attorney for Defendants MailE-mail

    Document

    PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

    Dated this 26th day of April, 2016. VIAL FOTHERINGHAM LLP

    /s/ T. Beau EllisT. Beau Ellis, OSB #093437Christopher M. Tingey, OSB # 01432617355 SW Boones Ferry Road, Suite ALake Oswego, OR 97035T: (503) 684-4111F: (503) 598-7758E: [email protected]: [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff  

  • 8/17/2019 Motion for Preliminary Injuction

    13/17

     

    Exhibit "A" 

    Real property in the County of Marion, State of Oregon, described as follows:

     A TRACT OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 21 AND 22, TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST WILLAMETTEMERIDIAN, MARION COUNTY, OREGON, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

    BEGINNING AT A 5/8" IRON ROD AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 31, OF FAIRWAY ONE ATCREEKSIDE P.U.D., AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 40, PAGE 113, MARION COUNTY BOOK OF TOWN PLATS;THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 384.34 FOOT RADIUS CURVE RIGHT (LONG CHORD: SOUTH 71°17'02"WEST 244.91 FEET) 249.26 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 89°16'48" WEST 484.45 FEETTO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 316.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE LEFT (LONGCHORD: SOUTH 71°47'32" WEST 205.01 FEET) 208.78 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH0°42'45" WEST 261.68 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 25°28'45" WEST 220.80 FEET TO A5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 78°22'34" EAST 45.25 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH87°20'20" EAST 138.72 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 78°35'55" EAST 195.13 FEET TO A

    5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 49°06'28" EAST 114.75 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH57°48'26" EAST 61.27 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 74°08'58" EAST 83.08 FEET TO A5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 71°56'44" EAST 148.23 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH84°19'03" EAST 108.68 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 25°33'32" EAST 112.74 FEET TO A5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 72°10'12" EAST 116.08 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH23°44'18" EAST 98.82 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 42°16'07" EAST 124.87 FEET TO A

    5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 77°41'12" EAST 120.21 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH65°36'24" EAST 93.59 FEET A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 56°53'07" EAST 157.13 FEET TO A 5/8"IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 50°37'56" EAST 170.84 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH

    19°37'49" EAST 87.01 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD: THENCE SOUTH 8°22'21" EAST 191.71 FEET A 5/8"IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 3°30'40" EAST 223.95 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH15°18'08" WEST 153.91 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 17°10'35" WEST 215.42 FEET TO A5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 0°16'14" EAST 140.29 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH

    2°54'38" WEST 160.64 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 4°01'07" WEST 190.05 FEET TO A5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 74°11'23'' EAST 113.38 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH53°47'34" EAST 63.68 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 35°04'06'' EAST 201.75 FEET TO A5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 33°41'07" EAST 86.01 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH68°00'58" EAST 254.26 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 35°09'39" EAST 80.97 FEET TO A5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 50°11'52" EAST 145.50 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH51°49'55" EAST 96.23 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 65°15'50" EAST 238.94 FEET TO A5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 77°04'10" EAST 336.11 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH77°51'16" EAST 205.32 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 70°43'37" EAST 183.22 FEET TO A5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 51°40'45" EAST 177.18 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH78°12'14" EAST 249.56 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 81°18'38" EAST 168.19 FEET TO A5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 74°30'48" EAST 73.75 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH

    78°31'16" EAST 206.68 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 62°48'47" EAST 229.55 FEET TO A

    5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 70°40'21" EAST 191.57 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH89°00'25" EAST 96.35 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 66°00'52" EAST 160.61 FEET TO A5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 33°54'31" EAST 36.06 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH78°00'31" EAST 87.95 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 28°38'07" EAST 53.54 FEET TO A

    5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 20°35'32" EAST 104.39 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH34°41'09" EAST 158.04 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 38°20'59" EAST 167.28 FEET TO A5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 186.19 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD ON THE EAST-WEST CENTERLINE

    OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST-WEST CENTERLINE SOUTH 89'38'12" EAST 651.20FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SUNNYSIDE ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AS FOLLOWS: NORTH 36°24'26" WEST 309.20 FEET; THENCE NORTH 24°18'49" WEST255.71 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 1109.84 FOOT RADIUS CURVE RIGHT (LONG CHORD:

    EXHIBIT A1 of 5

  • 8/17/2019 Motion for Preliminary Injuction

    14/17

     

    NORTH 16°23'47" WEST 305.74 FEET) 306.71 FEET; THENCE NORTH 8°28'46" WEST 320.52 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 81°31'14" WEST 12.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 8°28'46" WEST 29.81 FEET TO A 5/8"IRON ROD; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE WEST 156.99 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD;THENCE NORTH 23°42'40" WEST 250.35 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF LINE OF CREEKSIDE DRIVE AS SHOWN ON THE RECORDED PLAT OF GOLF CLUB ESTATES ATCREEKSIDE P.U.D.-PHASE I IN VOLUME 40, PAGE 21, SAID BOOK OF TOWN PLATS; THENCE ALONG

    THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PHASE I AS FOLLOWS: ON THE ARC OF A 493.52 FOOT RADIUS CURVERIGHT) LONG CHORD: NORTH 56°36'07" WEST 165.77 FEET) 166.56 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD;THENCE NORTH 46°56'00" WEST 300.11 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 43°04'00" WEST100.00 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 46°56'00" WEST 162.00 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD;THENCE NORTH 50°38'35" WEST 74.38 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 59°23'54" WEST

    75.66 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 68°18'21" WEST 76.54 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD;THENCE NORTH 76°22'54" WEST 75.88 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 85°31'00" WEST240.00 FEET TO A 5/8' IRON ROD TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 31, SAID PHASE I, BEING

     ALSO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 63, OF GOLF CLUB ESTATE AT CREEKSIDE P.U.D.-PHASE 2, IN VOLUME 40, PAGE 94, SAID BOOK OF TOWN PLATS; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID

    PHASE 2 AS FOLLOWS: NORTH 85°31'00" WEST 320.00 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH85°40'18" WEST 80.00 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 87°55'41" WEST 80.00 FEET TO A5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 89°09'08" WEST 80.00 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH

    86°13'58" WEST 80.00 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 88°52'15" WEST 80.61 FEET TO A5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 87°26'34" WEST 80.16 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH88°18'20" WEST 80.75 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 88°40'44" WEST 166.84 FEET TO A5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 72°10'24" WEST 36.94 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH6°08'05" WEST 55.00 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 75, SAID PHASE

    2, BEING ALSO IN THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID FAIRWAY ONE AT CREEKSIDE P.U.D.; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID FAIRWAY ONE AS FOLLOWS: SOUTH 83°51'55" WEST 132.63FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 336.92 FOOT RADIUS CURVE RIGHT (LONGCHORD: NORTH 87°31'30" WEST 100.87 FEET) 101.25 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 252.25 FOOT RADIUS CURVE LEFT (LONG CHORD: NORTH 80°14'32" WEST 11.67 FEET)11.67 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 11°59'22" EAST 77.91 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD;THENCE SOUTH 78°00'38" WEST 150.80 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 74°48'07" WEST

    797.03 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 73°09'22" WEST 352.71 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD;THENCE NORTH 64°24'35" WEST 52.61 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 76°15'53" WEST52.08 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 75°02'58" WEST 156.62 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD;THENCE NORTH 68°23'54" WEST 22.31 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 13°02'28" WEST

    88.66 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 27°35'33" WEST 70.60 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD;THENCE NORTH 85°00'15" WEST 64.45 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

     ALSO: (13TH FAIRWAY)

    EXHIBIT A2 of 5

  • 8/17/2019 Motion for Preliminary Injuction

    15/17

     

    BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 62 OF THE GOLF CLUB ESTATES AT CREEKSIDE,PHASE 2, P.U.D., AS RECORDED IN THE MARION COUNTY BOOK OF TOWN PLATS; THENCE RUNNINGSOUTH 4°29'00" WEST 57.71 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 62 ON THE NORTHERLYRIGHT OF WAY LINE OF CREEKSIDE DRIVE; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH85°31'00" WEST 122.10; THENCE 320.60 FEET ALONG A 1730.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT,(THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 89'10'28" WEST 320.15 FEET); THENCE SOUTH 83°51'55" WEST

    415.12 FEET TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF PUD.; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT OFWAY LINE SOUTH 83°51'55" WEST 132.62 FEET; THENCE 86.23 FEET ALONG A 286.95 FOOT RADIUSCURVE TO THE RIGHT, (THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 87°31'32" WEST 85.91 FEET); THENCELEAVING SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 08°13'11" WEST 70.40 FEET; THENCE NORTH 85° 44'11"EAST 168.91 FEET; THENCE NORTH 26°33'53" EAST 50.95 FEET; THENCE NORTH 42°22'47" EAST 74.74

    FEET; THENCE NORTH 55°05'07" EAST 54.85 FEET; THENCE NORTH 74°44'19" EAST 60.34 FEET;THENCE NORTH 43°31'12" EAST 84.51 FEET; THENCE NORTH 59°51'45" EAST 85.51 FEET; THENCENORTH 67°35'01" EAST 92.75 FEET; THENCE NORTH 78°10'34" EAST 132.73 FEET; THENCE NORTH

    75'40'13" EAST 129.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 84°58'50" EAST 81.05 FEET; THENCE NORTH 79°05'06"EAST 58.44 FEET; THENCE NORTH 86°33'17" EAST 68.52 FEET; THENCE NORTH 86°30'54" EAST 181.99

    FEET; THENCE SOUTH 80°38'56" EAST 48.97 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 50 OF GOLFCLUB ESTATES AT CREEKSIDE PUD., AS RECORDED IN THE MARION COUNTY BOOK OF TOWN PLATS;THENCE RUNNING SOUTH 89°49'27" EAST 160.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 48 OF

    SAID P.U.D.; THENCE SOUTH 85°26'27" EAST 240.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINES OF LOTS 48, 47 AND 46 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 45; THENCE SOUTH 84°12'00" EAST 406.89 FEET ALONGTHE SOUTH LINES OF LOTS 45, 44, 43, 42, AND 41 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 41 ON THEWEST SIDE OF CROOKED STICK LOOP; THENCE SOUTH 12°06'00" WEST 320.70 FEET ALONG THEWEST SIDE OF CROOKED STICK LOOP TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 40 OF SAID P.U.D.;

    THENCE RUNNING NORTH 84°12'00" WEST 363.89 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 40, 38, 37 AND 36 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 36 OF SAID P.U.D.; THENCE NORTH 85°31'00" WEST338.06 FEET ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF LOTS 35, 34, 33 AND 32 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OFLOT 32, BEING ALSO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 61 OF SAID PHASE 2 P.U.D.; THENCE NORTH85°31'00" WEST 27.30 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 61; THENCE SOUTH 77°41'12"WEST 159.51 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 61 AND 62, THENCE SOUTH 87°14'37" WEST22.54 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

     ALSO: (14TH FAIRWAY)BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 15 OF THE GOLF CLUB ESTATES AT CREEKSIDEP.U.D.--PHASE I DEVELOPMENT AS RECORDED IN THE MARION COUNTY BOOK OF TOWN PLATS;

    THENCE SOUTH 77°54'00" EAST 100.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF SAID LOT 15 TO THESOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 15; THENCE NORTH 12°06'00" EAST 73.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTCORNER OF LOT 14; THENCE NORTH 59°49'07" EAST 33.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF

    LOT 13; THENCE SOUTH 89°51'30" EAST 43.28 FEET ALONG SAID LOT 13 TO THE NORTHWESTCORNER OF LOT 12; THENCE SOUTH 09°52'20" EAST 319.98 FEET ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF LOTS 12,

    11, 10 AND LOT 9 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 9; THENCE SOUTH 08°29'38" EAST 240.00FEET ALONG LOTS 8, 7 AND LOT 6, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 6; THENCE SOUTH 00°32'51"WEST 74.96 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST OF LOT 5; THENCE SOUTH 12°07'48" WEST 74.34 FEET TO THE

    SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 4; THENCE SOUTH 71°56'38" EAST 100.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE

    WEST SIDE OF THE CROOKED STICK LOOP THENCE SOUTHERLY 101.96 FEET ALONG THE WEST SIDEOF SAID CROOKED STICK LOOP, THAT IS A 460 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT, (THE CHORD OFWHICH BEARS SOUTH 24°24'21" WEST 101.75 FEET); THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CROOKEDSTICK LOOP, SOUTH 30°45'20" WEST 177.05 FEET; THENCE 34.33 FEET ALONG A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS

    CURVE TO THE RIGHT (THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 79°55'38" WEST 30.27 FEET); THENCE30.02 FEET ALONG A 433.52 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT, (THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARSNORTH 48°55'02" WEST 30.01 FEET); THENCE NORTH 46°56'00" WEST 327.67 FEET TO THESOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 22 OF SAID PLAT; THENCE NORTH 21°27'20" EAST 170.59 FEET ALONGLOT 22 AND A PORTION OF LOT 21; THENCE NORTH 12°06'00" EAST 472.05 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTCORNER OF LOT 16; THENCE NORTH 77°54'00" WEST 100.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OFSAID LOT 16; THENCE NORTH 12°06'00" EAST 30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

    EXHIBIT A3 of 5

  • 8/17/2019 Motion for Preliminary Injuction

    16/17

     

    TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR ACCESS OVER THAT CERTAIN ROADWAY SHOWN AS CREEKSIDEDRIVE ON SUBDIVISION PLAT GOLF CLUB ESTATE AND CREEKSIDE PUD. PHASE I AS RECORDED INTHE MARION COUNTY BOOK OF TOWN PLATS, VOLUME 40, PAGE 21; SUBDIVISION PLAT GOLF CLUBESTATES AT CREEKSIDE PUD. PHASE 2 AS RECORDED IN THE MARION COUNTY BOOK OF TOWNPLATS, VOLUME 40, PAGE 94; SUBDIVISION PLAT FAIRWAY I AT CREEKSIDE P.U.D. AS RECORDED IN

    THE MARION COUNTY BOOK OF TOWN PLATS, VOLUME 40, PAGE 113, AS DISCLOSED IN ARTICLE 8,SECTION 4 OF THE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS OF GOLFCOURSE ESTATES AT CREEKSIDE, RECORDED AUGUST 26, 1992 IN REEL 982 PAGE 273 AS MODIFIEDBY DECLARATION OF MODIFIED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS OF GOLF COURSEESTATES AT CREEKSIDE, RECORDED AT REEL 1144, PAGE 300, AND AS MODIFIED BY SECOND

    MODIFICATION OF DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS OF GOLFCOURSE ESTATES AT CREEKSIDE, RECORDED AT REEL 1163, PAGE 784, MARION COUNTY RECORDS.

     ALSO TOGETHER WITH THOSE EASEMENTS SET FORTH IN THAT GOLF PLAY EASEMENT, INCLUDINGTHE TERMS AND PROVISIONS THEREOF, RECORDED MARCH 22, 1995 IN REEL 1227, PAGE 617, DEED

    RECORDS FOR MARION COUNTY, OREGON.

    SAVE AND EXCEPT:

    BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1, OF FAIRWAY ONE AT CREEKSIDE P.U.D.DEVELOPMENT AS PLATTED AND RECORDED IN THE MARION COUNTY BOOK OF TOWN PLATS, VOLUME 40, PAGE 113; THENCE RUNNING SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG A 252.25 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TOTHE RIGHT 11.67 FEET (THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 80°14'32" EAST 11.67 FEET); THENCECONTINUING SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG A 336.92 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT 50.88 FEET (THE

    CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 83°14'32" EAST 50.83 FEET); THENCE SOUTH 34°31'42" EAST 31.72SET; THENCE SOUTH 34°22'40" WEST 40.51 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 57°49'40" WEST 43.48 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 78°00' 38" WEST 162.00 FEET, PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF THE SAIDFAIRWAY ONE DEVELOPMENT; THENCE CONTINUING PARALLEL WITH THE SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY OFTHE FAIRWAY ONE DEVELOPMENT, NORTH 74°48'07" WEST 416.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 15°11'53"EAST 18.01 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 10 OF FAIRWAY ONE AT CREEKSIDE PUD.DEVELOPMENT; THENCE FOLLOWING ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF THE SAID FAIRWAY ONE

    PROJECT, SOUTH 74°48'07" EAST 418.85 FEET; THENCE NORTH 78°00'38" EAST 150.80 FEET TO THESOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1 OF FAIRWAY ONE AT CREEKSIDE; THENCE NORTH 11°59'22"WEST 77.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

    SAVE AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED IN STATUTORY BARGAIN AND SALE DEED RECORDED APRIL 18, 2008 AS REEL 2943, PAGE 124, FILM RECORDS, WHICH IS PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED ASFOLLOWS:

     A PORTION OF A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN REEL 1906, PAGE 396, MARION COUNTY, OREGONDEED RECORDS, SAID TRACT IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

    BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 511, GOLF CLUB ESTATES AT CREEKSIDE PHASE 12,P.U.D. (PHASE 12) AS RECORDED IN THE MARION COUNTY BOOK OF TOWN PLATS IN VOLUME H46,PAGE 70, MARION COUNTY, OREGON BOOK OF TOWN PLATS, THENCE SOUTH 17°10'43" WEST, ALONG

    THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT, A DISTANCE OF 162.26 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°17'02" EAST, A

    DISTANCE OF 140.27 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02°55'54" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 160.58 FEET; THENCESOUTH 04°00'03" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 125.35 FEET; THENCE NORTH 26°04'44" EAST, LEAVING SAIDLOT LINE, A DISTANCE OF 37.76 FEET, TO THE CENTERLINE OF BATTLE CREEK; THENCE NORTH04°55'25" WEST, ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF CREEK, A DISTANCE OF 12.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH

    19°40'55" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 22.32 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23°12'23" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 33.07FEET; THENCE NORTH 35°19'07" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 28.11 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45°24'51" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 23.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 10°04'34" EAST, LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE OF CREEK, ADISTANCE OF 70.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02°10'23" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 48.50 FEET; THENCENORTHEASTERLY, ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 2307.50 FEET, (THE CHORD OFWHICH BEARS NORTH 00°00'41" EAST, 332.59 FEET), AN ARC DISTANCE OF 332.88 FEET, TO THEPOINT OF BEGINNING.

    EXHIBIT A4 of 5

  • 8/17/2019 Motion for Preliminary Injuction

    17/17

     

     ALSO TOGETHER WITH:BEGINNING AT A 5/8" IRON ROD, BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 474, GOLF CLUB ESTATES AT CREEKSIDE PHASE 11 P.U.D., AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 45, PAGE 182, MARION COUNTY BOOK OFTOWN PLATS AND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 3WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, MARION COUNTY, OREGON; THENCE NORTH 80°58'12" EAST 524.48

    FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 00°21'48" WEST 76.00 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCENORTH 77°04'10" EAST 130.04 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD: THENCE 64.08 FEET ALONG A 975.00 FOOTRADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT (THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 78°57'08" EAST 64.07 FEET) TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 12°08'44" WEST 201.18 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH77°50'44" WEST 45.59 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 77°03'26" WEST 335.96 FEET TO A

    5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH 65°15'55" WEST 238.89 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH51°50'48" WEST 96.43 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

    NOTE: This Legal Description was created prior to January 01, 2008.


Recommended