Motivational intervention for young males in
Bangladesh and Kenya – the research angle
Anke van der Kwaak, Pam Baatsen, Paul Kiage,
Mohamad Bellal Hossain
Background Young male in Kenya and Bangladesh:
• Early sexual debut, concurrent sexual partnerships, unsafe sexual
behaviour leading to amongst others STIs
• Absent in sexual health and reproductive services through:
• Perceived stigma by
the young males
themselves
• Moralizing and
patronizing attitudes
of health providers; and
or
• Top down risk approach
Amsterdam, The Netherlands www.kit.nl
Background MI+ approach
• Motivational Interviewing (MI) used to address a variety of
health-related issues, but limited application in the SRHR
domain, especially among young men.
• MI + approach inspired by evidence that sexual risk
reduction interventions are (more) effective if behavioural
individual level interventions are combined with
group–level peer-led interventions addressing issues of
intimacy, relationships, coping skills, interpersonal skills,
relapse prevention, sexual negotiation and communication
skills.
MI+ Programme
Client-centred programme which aims to:
1) substantially change the way in which health
professionals and peer educators engage with young
MSM in Bangladesh and young male in Kenya; and
introduce a genuinely new dimension to the
provider-client and peer educator/peer
interaction, and
2) elicit and strengthen clients’ motivation for
change
Amsterdam, The Netherlands www.kit.nl
MI+ programme • Builds on interventions in place: mix of
health service, outreach work and
community level activities
• Intervention sites enhanced with the MI+ approach; control sites
continue work as usual
• Master trainers, health care providers, (teachers) and peer
educators receive three trainings by the GGD Amsterdam team; &
mentoring and coaching in between
• All trainees implement MI+ approach as much as possible in their
daily work
• Master trainers
responsibility increases over
time
Amsterdam, The Netherlands www.kit.nl
Organizations involved
Amsterdam, The Netherlands www.kit.nl
Overall lead agency: KIT
Lead on motivationnal intervention: GGD
Amsterdam
Lead on programme implementation: Bandhu
Bangladesh
Lead on programme implementation: AMREF
Kenya
Lead on operational research: KIT
National researcher in Bangladesh
National researcher in Kenya
Advisory group: consortium members and key experts
Consortium Management Committtee consisting of KIT
GGD; Bandhu; and AMREF
MI+ targets Bangladesh (Dhaka and
Chittagong) Kenya (Siaya and Bondo)
MI+ intervention sites and control sites
Service providers MI+ (Drs, counsellors, paramedics) Teachers
6 for MI+ sites and 6 for control 32 for MI+ and 32 for control 16 MI+ and 16 for control
Peer Educators MI+
20 for MI+ and 20 for control 36 for MI+ and 36 for control
Target Group – overall
500 per site: 1,000 in total for MI + having access and be able to use SRHR services (HIV testing, STI management and counselling) against 1,000 for control
7,500 having access and be able to use SRHR services (HIV testing, STI management and counselling) against 7,500 for control
Sexual behaviour 500 with safer sexual practices in MI+ (against 500 in control)
2,000 with safer sexual practices in MI+ against 2,000
Amsterdam, The Netherlands www.kit.nl
MI+ training in Bangladesh
Amsterdam, The Netherlands www.kit.nl
Research
Operational research is an intrinsic component, and is focused
on:
• Measuring the effectiveness of MI+ approach for young
MSM/males in Bangladesh and Kenya
• Main research questions:
MI+ effective strategy to improve the SRHR of
young MSM/males in both settings?
Are those who have never used services now taking
them up and are those using them getting better
quality services addressing their needs?
Amsterdam, The Netherlands www.kit.nl
Research Methodology
• Mixed method comparison with quasi-experimental design:
Before and after study for a double difference comparison
between intervention and control sites
• Before and after study consists of :
Desk review with secondary data,
Survey tool, FGDs and IDIs with clients,
providers and key informants,
self-reporting, systematic observation
• Qualitative trajectory
• In last year of project; write shops to
document operational research results,
as well as other experiences gained.
Amsterdam, The Netherlands www.kit.nl
Amsterdam, The Netherlands www.kit.nl
Activities Kenya Bangladesh
Before study Sept – Oct 2013 Dec – Jan 2014
First MI training Nov 2013 Feb 2014
Second MI+ training March 2014 May 2014
Trajectory May 2014 July 2014
Third MI+ Training July 2014 September 2014
After study December 2014 February 2015
Dissemination results 2015 2015
MI+ Trainings control sites 2015 2015
Time line
What we see till now!
Bangladesh
- Scope is doable; one MSM organisation and homogenous
target group but challenges reaching 15 – 18 yrs olds
- Young MSM are facing many challenges related to sexual
feelings, masturbation, dating and STIs
- MSM confronted with stigma and MI+ seen as an useful
approach to address this
- Lot of interest in the approach – desire to move away from
doing business as usual
Amsterdam, The Netherlands www.kit.nl
What we see till now!
Kenya
- Young males not part of the development discourse
- Poverty, access to education, sexual life, and growing up give
many challenges, including sexual violence
- Access to health services is a problem. Delay in a context of
STI and HIV problematic
- Judgmental attitudes of providers
Amsterdam, The Netherlands www.kit.nl
Trajectory
- In Kenya, one round: in-depth interviews and FGD with
nurses, teachers, counsellors, peer educators and young
men
- MI Part of the supervisions of the so called DASCO’s
- Trainees train other colleagues and peers
- MI+ individual and group sessions complex
Amsterdam, The Netherlands www.kit.nl
Learning from trajectory: All professionals:
- MI has changed their lives on account of more than one way
- Nurses able to identify problems young males and more of
them coming to services
- Self esteem increased of all groups, they feel they have
something to offer
- Being less judgmental helps them understand the real
problems better
- Most do not only apply it on males but also a lot on females
(young girls exposed to violence or unintended pregnancies
Amsterdam, The Netherlands www.kit.nl
Challenges
- Time (training, concepts, internalization)
- Educational background a denominator of success
- Contextualization of concepts and MI approach
- Need for training material that combines sexual and
reproductive health and rights and MI
- MI+: groups not worked out sufficiently
Amsterdam, The Netherlands www.kit.nl
Conclusions so far…
Trajectory indicates
- attitude change of different professional groups; MI enables
them to do their work better
- More young men coming to facility but this needs strengthening
in time to make it long lasting
- Not easy to measure behavourial change and access of young
males and MSM in the present design
- Unexpected spin offs need to be documented
Amsterdam, The Netherlands www.kit.nl
Acknowledgements
• GGD Amsterdam: Titia Heijman, Angelita
Casanovas, Kees de Jong, Thijs Biemans
• Bandhu: Shale Ahmed
• AMREF: Peter Ofware, Walter Odede
• DGIS Ministry of Foreign Affairs: SRH
Fund, Marcel de Kort
• KIT: Karen ‘t Hooft, Liezel Wolmarans
Amsterdam, The Netherlands www.kit.nl
Amsterdam, The Netherlands www.kit.nl