+ All Categories
Home > Documents > MOUNT DORA CITY COUNCIL

MOUNT DORA CITY COUNCIL

Date post: 25-Mar-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
75
MOUNT DORA CITY COUNCIL October 16, 2018, 2:00 PM City Hall Board Room, 510 N. Baker Street WORK SESSION AGENDA CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL DISCUSSION ITEMS 1. Update on Economic Development Presented by Dr. Richard Levey 2. Fiber Business Model and Technology Consultant Presentation 3. Voluntary Annexation Process 4. Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update from GAI Community Solutions Group, Inc. FUTURE MEETING DATES November 6, 2018, 1:00 PM, Work Session November 6, 2018, 4:30 PM, Regular Session November 20, 2018 6:00 PM, Regular Session December 3, 2018, 6:00 PM, Regular Session December 18, 2018, 3:00 PM Work Session (Strategic Planning) December 18, 2018, 6:00 PM, Regular Session City Hall 510 N. Baker St. Mount Dora, FL 32757 Honorable Nick Girone Mayor ViceMayor Cathy Hoechst Councilmember AtLarge Councilmember Laurie Tillett District 1 Councilmember Cal Rolfson District 2 Councilmember John Tucker District 3 Councilmember Marc Crail District 4 Councilmember Harmon Massey AtLarge ADJOURNMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 286.0105, FLORIDA STATUTES, IF ANY PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE AT THIS MEETING WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT ANY MEETING OR HEARING, SUCH PERSON MAY NEED A RECORD OF THESE PROCEEDINGS. FOR SUCH PURPOSE, A PERSON MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. VERBATIM RECORD WILL NOT BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF MOUNT DORA. NOTICE: IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990, PERSONS NEEDING A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING SHOULD CONTACT GWEN JOHNS, CITY CLERK, AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE PROCEEDINGS. TELEPHONE (352) 7357126 FOR ASSISTANCE. IF HEARING IMPAIRED, TELEPHONE THE FLORIDA RELAY SERVICE NUMBERS, (800) 955- 8771 (TDD) OR (800) 955-8770 (VOICE) FOR ASSISTANCE. PAGE 2 3 70 74 Page 1 of 75
Transcript

MOUNT DORA CITY COUNCIL October 16, 2018, 2:00 PM

City Hall Board Room, 510 N. Baker Street

WORK SESSION AGENDA

CALL TO ORDER 

ROLL CALL

DISCUSSION ITEMS

   

 

 

1. Update on Economic Development ­ Presented by Dr. Richard Levey

2. Fiber Business Model and Technology Consultant Presentation

3. Voluntary Annexation Process

4. Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update from GAI Community SolutionsGroup, Inc.

FUTURE MEETING DATES

• November 6, 2018, 1:00 PM, Work Session• November 6, 2018, 4:30 PM, Regular Session• November 20, 2018 6:00 PM, Regular Session• December 3, 2018, 6:00 PM, Regular Session• December 18, 2018, 3:00 PM Work Session (Strategic Planning)• December 18, 2018, 6:00 PM, Regular Session

City Hall510 N. Baker St.Mount Dora, FL 32757

Honorable Nick GironeMayor

Vice­Mayor Cathy Hoechst Councilmember At­Large

Councilmember Laurie TillettDistrict 1

Councilmember Cal RolfsonDistrict 2 

Councilmember John TuckerDistrict 3 

Councilmember Marc CrailDistrict 4 

Councilmember Harmon MasseyAt­Large 

ADJOURNMENT

PURSUANT  TO  SECTION  286.0105,  FLORIDA  STATUTES,  IF  ANY  PERSON  DECIDES  TO  APPEAL  ANY DECISION MADE AT THIS MEETING WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT ANY MEETING OR HEARING, SUCH PERSON MAY NEED A RECORD OF THESE PROCEEDINGS. FOR SUCH PURPOSE, A PERSON MAY NEED  TO ENSURE THAT  A VERBATIM  RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS  IS MADE WHICH RECORD INCLUDES  THE  TESTIMONY  AND  EVIDENCE  UPON  WHICH  THE  APPEAL  IS  TO  BE  BASED.  VERBATIM RECORD  WILL  NOT  BE  PROVIDED  BY  THE  CITY  OF  MOUNT  DORA. 

NOTICE: IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990, PERSONS NEEDING A SPECIAL  ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE  IN  THIS PROCEEDING SHOULD  CONTACT GWEN  JOHNS, CITY  CLERK,  AT  LEAST  48  HOURS  PRIOR  TO  THE  PROCEEDINGS.  TELEPHONE  (352)  735­7126  FOR ASSISTANCE.  IF  HEARING  IMPAIRED,  TELEPHONE  THE  FLORIDA  RELAY  SERVICE  NUMBERS,  (800)  955-8771 (TDD) OR (800) 955-8770 (VOICE) FOR ASSISTANCE.

PAGE

2

3

70

74

Page 1 of 75

510 N. Baker St.Mount Dora, FL 32757

352-735-7126

DATE: October 16, 2018

TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members

FROM: Robin R. Hayes, City Manager

SUBJECT: Update on Economic Development - Presented by Dr. Richard Levey

Introduction:This is a routine update to be provided for the Wolf Branch Innovation District.

Discussion:Dr. Levey will provide an update on economic development and planning activities in the Wolf Branch Innovation District including annexation, land use and infrastructure needs.

Budget Impact:No budgetary impact to the Economic Update.

Strategic Impact:Economic Development with an impact on Infrastructure.

Recommendation Consultant to provide the City Council the quarterly update and open for discussion.

Prepared by: Gwen Johns, City ClerkReviewed by: Tim Wilson, Approved - 10/08/2018

Misty Sommer, Deputy City Clerk Approved - 10/09/2018Gwen Johns, City Clerk Approved - 10/09/2018Robin Hayes, City Manager Final Approval - 10/10/2018

Page 2 of 75

510 N. Baker St.Mount Dora, FL 32757

352-735-7126

DATE: October 16, 2018

TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members

FROM: Robin R. Hayes, City Manager

SUBJECT: Fiber Business Model and Technology Consultant Presentation

Introduction:This is a request for City Council to review the Fiber Business Model and Service Provider Presentation regarding the Wolf Branch Innovation District.

Discussion:Community fiber networks have varying uses and more and more communities are leveraging their network to become a robust asset for their community. A municipal fiber network can help the City become more resilient for upcoming technical and societal changes. It can help provide our constituents with options for high-speed broadband internet service as well as smart city initiatives.

Municipal fiber networks can help communities stimulate and attract new businesses, attract and retain residents, lower dependency on large incumbent communication companies, and adapt to technology changes and demands. According to the Fiber Broadband Association, fiber speeds equal improved economic performance. Fiber gives consumers access to fast speeds and the entire city with opportunities for economic growth to include more jobs, more innovation, and incentives for additional infrastructure investments and companies relocating or expanding into the City. The association claimed in a 2015 study (https://www.fiberbroadband.org/blog/study-shows-home-values-up-3.1-with-access-to-fiber) that fiber to the home increases home values by up to 3.1 percent.

Staff coordinated meetings with various technology consultants and service provider vendors to learn about potential business opportunities, review our Innovation District plans, and gather information. We met with three technology-consulting companies that offer consulting, engineering, business planning and negotiations, Magellan Advisors, Columbia Telecommunications Corporation (CTC), and Fujitsu. We also met with service providers to include PCS Fiber (our current fiber vendor), Summit Broadband, and WANRack. Magellan Advisors (attachment 1) and CTC (attachment 2) provided us proposals for consulting services to offer the City long-term “smart community” design and architecture. Fujitsu was unable to

Page 3 of 75

Office of the City Manager Memorandum -- Page 2 of 2

present a proposal in the time frame we provided.

We asked Magellan Advisors to present information to the Council as it relates to the Innovation District project and the services they offer. CTC was unable to attend the Council work session as our contact at CTC had a prior commitment and sends their regrets.

Budget Impact:None at this time, budgetary impacts may be paid for by a provider based on the direction of the City Council and the Wolf Branch Innovation District plan.

Strategic Impact:Economic development and growth management as well as internal and external communication.

Recommendation City Council to provide direction on Innovation District fiber technology consulting services.

Attachment(s):1. Magellan Proposal - ICT Master Plan Wolf Branch2. CTC Proposal

Prepared by: Gwen Johns, City ClerkReviewed by: Johnna Shamblin, IT Manager Approved - 10/09/2018

Tim Wilson, Approved - 10/09/2018Gwen Johns, City Clerk Approved - 10/09/2018Misty Sommer, Deputy City Clerk Approved - 10/09/2018Robin Hayes, City Manager Final Approval - 10/10/2018

Page 4 of 75

Proposal

InformationandCommunicationsTechology(ICT)MasterPlanfortheWolfBranch

InnovationDistrictCityofMountDora,FL

Prepared For: Robin Hayes City Manager

Prepared by: Courtney Violette Chief Operating Officer Magellan Advisors O: 386.931.3520 E: [email protected] www.magellan-advisors.com 999 18th Street, Suite 3000 Denver, CO 80202

ATTACHMENT #1

Page 5 of 75

2

OverviewofMagellanAdvisorsMagellanAdvisors,LLCisaColorado-basedfirmwithlocalofficesinDenver,CO,LosAngeles,CAandMiami,FL.Magellan’sprimaryaddressis99918thStreet,Suite3000Denver,CO80202.MagellanAdvisors,LLCwasfoundedinJanuaryof2004andhasbeeninoperationasaLimitedLiabilityCompanysinceinception.WeareaFloridaSmallBusinessEnterprisebasedoutofDenver,Colorado.Magellan’sofficenumberis888.960.5299.

Magellanprovidesleadingbroadband,smartcity,informationtechnologyandsecurityconsultingservicestopublicandprivate organizations. We are a full spectrum planning and implementationfirm that brings togethertechnology,communicationsandutilityconsultingtocreatesmartgigabitcitiesoftomorrow.

Our professionals bring years of experience from the broadband, telecom, information technology and governmentsectors.We are thought leaders and real-world implementers of broadband and smart city networksthat keepcommunitiescompetitiveinthedigitalworld.

Unlikemostconsultingfirms,wepartnerwithourclientseverystepoftheway,whethertheyaredeployinginstitutionalfibernetworks,developingbroadbandpublic-privatepartnershipsordeployingsmartcitynetworks.Wearea“hands-on”firmwithstrongprojectmanagementabilitiesandimplementationskillstoseeourclient’sprojectsthroughfromconcepttocompletion.

Weareonlysuccessfulwhenourclientsaresuccessful.Ourgoalistodeliverpracticalbroadbandandtechnologysolutionsthatourclientscanimplementintheircommunities.Throughourservices,over$1billionofnewfiberinvestmentshavebeenmadeconnectingmorethan1,000schools,hospitals,librariesandgovernmentsandpassingnearly1millionhomeswithfiber.

Broadband Fiber To The Home

Cellular & DAS

Utilities

Grid Security Energy Efficiency

Transportation

Vehicle Detection EV

Charging

Healthcare Telehealth Telemedicine

Public Safety Video Surveillance Sensor Networks

Page 6 of 75

3

ServingOver400LocalGovernmentandUtilities

Page 7 of 75

4

PortfolioofServices Magellan istheonlyfirmthatprovidescomprehensivebroadbandplanning, implementationandprojectmanagementservices,enablingourclientswithaturnkeyconsultingpartnerthathelpsthemthrougheverystepoftheprocess.Ourprojectteamsarecomprisedofprofessionalswithsignificantoperationalexperienceinthebroadband,publicutility,localgovernment,smartcityand informationtechnologysectors.Unlikemanyconsultingfirms,wehavedeepbusinessandoperationalexpertiseplanning,buildingandmanagingnetworks,skillsthatareparamounttohelpingourclientsplanandimplement their own broadband networks and smart city initiatives by creating effective internal and externalpartnerships.Our consultantsdevelop real-world,actionable strategies thatorganizations can relyon to support thedevelopmentoftheirbroadbandandsmartcityinitiatives.Nootherfirmintheindustryhasthesecombinedcapabilities.

Magellanusesacustomizedapproach ineveryprojectbasedontheneedsofourclientsandtheircommunities.Wedevelop innovative solutions that allow public and private organizations to best utilize their strengths to expandbroadbandanddevelopsmartcityapplications.Magellanisattheforefrontofpublic-privatepartnershipdevelopment,working to negotiate and forge these partnerships between public organizations and private broadband providers.Conqueringbroadbandissuesoftentakestheparticipationofmultiplepartiesthatarealignedaroundcommongoals.Magellanhelpscommunitiesrecruitinnovativeprovidersandformstrategicpartnershipsthatbenefitprovidersandthecommunitiestheyserve.Magellanalsoprovidesstrategicplanswithblueprintsforcitiestobuild,expandandoperatetheirmunicipalfibernetworksshouldtheychosetodoso.

FeasibilityStudiesMagellanhelpspublicorganizationsandbroadbandoperatorsdeterminereasonableexpectationsfordeployingfibertothepremisenetworks.Wedevelopcomprehensivefeasibilitystudiesthatassessthecurrentbroadbandenvironmentanddeterminetheopportunitiestodeployadvancedbroadbandnetworks.Ourfeasibilitystudiesarerealworldtestedandbasedonthelatestbroadbandindustrytrendsthatprovidestrategicdirectionforcommunitiestoachievetheirbroadbandandsmartcitygoals.

• CommunityNeedsAssessments • BusinessModels&FinancialPlanning• MarketAnalysis&CurrentEnvironment • Design&Engineering• NetworkAnalysis&Inventory • Opportunity,Risk&BenefitAnalysis

BroadbandEngineeringOurbroadbanddesignandengineeringservicesprovidethelatesttechnicaldesignsforfiber-to-the-premise,backbone,metroandlong-haulnetworks.Ourwirelessdesignandengineeringservicesdevelopeffectivefixedwireless,microwaveand WiFi networks to cover the most challenging terrain. Our services cover all aspects of broadband design andengineering, from outside plant fiber andwireless, to equipment, to services and content, to BSS/OSS and systemsintegration.

• FTTH,FTTP,Metro&Long-HaulFiber • Routing,Switching&MPLS• FixedWireless,Microwave&WiFi • Internet,Voice&VideoIntegration• GPON,ActiveEthernet&WDM • BSS/OSS&NetworkManagementSystems

888 960 5299 g1g @magellan-adv1sors com Page 8 of 75

5

BusinessModels&PartnershipsMagellanisontheforefrontofemergingbusinessmodelsandpartnershipdevelopmentwithinthebroadbandindustry.Wesuccessfullyplan,negotiateandexecutepartnershipagreementsbetweenpublicorganizationsandprivateoperators,leveragingthestrengthsofeachorganizationtobenefitthecommunity.WehaveastellarrecordofrecruitingbroadbandproviderstolocalcommunitiesandhelpingtheseorganizationsmaketheircommunitiesGigabitReady.

• DarkFiber,OpenAccess,TriplePlay • PartnerRecruitment&RFQs• FeasibilityAnalysisofBusinessModels • Advocacy&NegotiationinPartnerships• Public-PrivatePartnershipDevelopment • Opportunity,Risk&BenefitAnalysis

Financing&GrantsMagellan provides extensive financial planning services for organizations looking to invest in advanced broadbandnetworks. Our extensive financial plans help government organizations and private operators understand theopportunitiesandrisksandthemostfeasiblefinancialstrategiestoachievetheirgoals.Ourplansareinvestmentreadyand are routinely used to support fundingwith bond underwriters, banks, private equity firms and grant programs.Magellanalsomaintainsaportfoliooffinancingpartnersandgrantprogramsthatwebringtocommunitiestohelpthemacquirefunding.

• Investment-ReadyFinancialPlans • BroadbandGrantWriting&Management• FundingDevelopment • FCC,E-Rate,CAF&StatePrograms• PartnerRecruitment • EconomicDevelopmentGrantPrograms

ProjectManagementMagellanhelpsoperators,utilitiesandgovernmentorganizations implementnext-generationnetworksandsmartcityinitiatives.Weprovideturnkeyprojectmanagementservicesthatenabletheseorganizationstomaintainresourcesthatcovereveryaspectofdeployingbroadbandnetworks,fromfiberandwirelessnetworkdeployment,toequipmentandcontentintegration,tomarketingandsales,tooperationsandmanagement.Magellanprovidestheonlyturnkeysolutionthat enables these organizations to deploy their networks in a timely manner and launch their networks with theconfidencetoachievethebestresultsintheircommunities.

• Procurement&ContractNegotiation• ConstructionManagement

• ContentAcquisition&Agreements• Sales,Marketing&BusinessDevelopment

• NetworkCommissioning&Certification • Business&OperationsManagement

PolicyDevelopmentMagellanmaintainsknowledgeofbestpracticeinpolicydevelopmentandorganizationalstructureforimplementingandoperatingbroadbandnetworksandsmartcityinitiatives.Wehelpmunicipalitiesandutilitiesorganizeandrefineinternalbusinessprocessesforimprovedcommunications,projectmanagement,financialmanagementandpolicydevelopment.Weprovideour clientsa knowledgebaseof zoning, rightofwaymanagementandwirelesspolicies forenablingandfacilitating the development of broadband infrastructures and smart city initiatives.Our recommendations generatebusinessprocessesandworkflowsthatimproveinternalandexternalpartnershipsforstreamliningongoingexpansionofbroadbandandsmartcitydeployments.

888 960 5299 g1g @magellan-adv1sors com Page 9 of 75

6

• RightofWayManagementOrdinance• WirelessOrdinance&Guidelines

• DigOnce&JointTrenchPolicies• TelecommunicationsMasterFunding

• FiberOrdinance&Guidelines • Internal&ExternalWorkingGroups

AdditionalServicesMagellanprovidesawiderangeofsupplementaryservices in informationtechnologyandsecurity,smartcityplanningandnetworkingtechnologyfields.Manyofourservicescomplementoneanother,allowingMagellantoprovideaone-stop-shopforourclients’fullrangeofbroadband,smartcity,ITandsecurityneeds.Magellan’sexpertsleadtheindustryinplanninganddeployingthelatesttechnologysolutionstomeetawiderangeofbusinessneeds.AstheInternetofThingstransitionsfromconcepttoreality,Magellanhelpsitsclientsadapttotherapidlychangingworldandpreparecommunitiestothriveinthedigitaldomain.

• InformationTechnology• SmartCityConsulting

• UtilitySecurity&SCADAConsulting• PCICompliance&Implementation

• PublicSafetyCJISConsulting • InformationSecurityConsulting

888 960 5299 g1g @magellan-adv1sors com Page 10 of 75

7

KeyPrincipals

CourtneyViolette–ChiefOperatingOfficerCourtneyhas leddozensofmunicipalbroadbandplanningand implementationprojectsacrossthe country. He is a Certified Fiber-To-The-Home Professional and holds several technicalcertifications in broadband, information technology and information security. Prior to joiningMagellan,hespent6yearsastheCIOfortheCityofPalmCoast.Duringthistime,heplannedandbuiltthefirsttrueCity-ownedopen-accessnetworkintheSoutheast.Throughhisleadership,thenetworkgrewtoservegovernment,business,educationandhealthcareneedsacrosstheCity,saving these organizations millions of dollars and providing gigabit connectivity to meet thecommunity’sneeds.CourtneyholdsaMA in InformationTechnologyManagementandaBS inComputerSciencefromWebsterUniversity.

MarkLane–SeniorTechnicalConsultantMark Lane has over 30 years of experience in enterprise IT, carrier network operations, andtechnology consulting. While serving as CTO for Bristol Virginia Utilities OptiNet, he helpedprovide thestrategicdirectionandpractical implementation responsible for their fiber-to-the-premise (FTTP) network build-out and broadband service deployment for eight counties inSouthwestVA.HisvisionandleadershipcontributedtoBristolVAbeingselectedasanIntelligentCommunityForumTop7IntelligentCityin2009.MarkreceivedaBachelorsinComputerSciencefromtheUniversityofTennessee.

DanHowick–VPDesignandConstructionDan Howick has over 15 years of experience working in the planning, layout and design oftelecommunicationsnetworks,specializinginfiberoptics.Heworkshand-inhandwithsomeofthenation’slargestserviceproviderswhorelyonhisreputationandindustryknowledgetohelpdesignand installadvancedfiber-opticsystemsthroughouttheCountry.Dan’sexpertise inthetelecommunicationsindustryfocusesonfiber-opticnetworksinboththeinsideandoutsideplantenvironments.Hisresponsibilitieshaveincludedthelayout,anddesignofoutsideplantnetworksforcarriers,theUnitedStatesGovernment,localmunicipalities,andprivatenetworks.Danexcelsin the areas of route planning and optimization, as-built recording and development, plantverificationanddocumentation,AutoCADlayoutforbothplan&profileviewsforconstruction.Dan also has extensive experience in best practices, methods and procedures fordesign/installationinfiberopticsincludingterminations,splicingandtesting.

Page 11 of 75

8

GillianVioletteEd.D–ResearchAnalystGillianhasoveradecadeworkinginbusinessmanagementandsalesinfieldsofpharmaceuticals,hospitality, insurance,and traininganddevelopment.Shehasexperience inmanaginghumanresourcerelatedfunctions,staffing,andprojectmanagement.GillianjoinedtheMagellanteaminthecapacityofresearch,publication,andqualityassuranceinreporting.SherecentlyattainedadoctoraldegreeinEducationalLeadershipwhereherresearchfocuswasrelatedtobroadbandInternetinK-12schoolsandthedigitaldivide.

TimScott–SeniorConsultantTimhasaninternational,broadanddiversebackgroundacrossnearly20yearsofexperienceinthetelecommunicationsandbroadbandmarkets.Wellknownacrossthefiberindustry,Timhasspokenatvariousindustryeventssharinghispassionandknowledgerelatedtothebenefitsfiberinfrastructure can bring to local communities. Tim enjoys engaging with local governments,findingabalancebetween the interestsofpublicandprivatesectors,and thendefining thesethrough Public Private Partnership engagements. Tim has a sound business and technologyunderstandingwithbothproduct,operations,andcarrierexperiencesacrossvariousbroadbandnetworkengagementsthatincludeboththeprivateandpublicsectors.

Dr.GregLaudeman–ProjectManagerGregLaudeman isa leader in innovative, talentand technology-basedeconomicdevelopmentstrategy, research, and implementation.He is the Executive& Founderof Eduity, LLC,whichprovides talent-and technology-basedeconomicdevelopment services,and isapplying socialmedia to transform workforce planning and development. Greg’s diverse experience as ananalyst,communicator,facilitator,andorganizerhasalwaysfocusedonhowtechnologycanmakecommunitiesandorganizationsmorecompetitive,innovative,andproductive.ForoveradecadeGreg led community technology outreach efforts for theGeorgia Tech Enterprise InnovationInstitute.Greghasadoctorate inLearningandLeadershipfromtheUniversityofTennesseeatChattanooga,hasmasterdegrees inPublicPolicy fromGeorgiaTechandTelecommunicationsfromMichiganState,andabachelordegreeinMassCommunicationfromUTC.

EricOgle–SeniorBroadbandConsultant

Erichasspentmostofhiscareerinvolvedinplanningandpolicywithfocusontechnology-driveneconomicdevelopmentforAppalachiancommunities.PriortojoiningMagellan,Ericspent13years as Research Associate with University of Tennessee’s Baker Center for Public Policy.Amongsignificantprojects,EricleddevelopmentofthefirsttwocommunitywirelessnetworksintheSoutheast.ErichasprojectmanagementexperienceservingasPrincipalInvestigatorforcorporateand federal sponsors,oftenengaging stakeholders inparticipatoryprocesses.Ericholdspositionsinorganizations,includingaroleasTreasureroftheRuralTelecommunicationCongress.Prior toUT,EricheldeconomicdevelopmentpositionswithNewportUtilities, theTennesseeValleyAuthority,andCockeCountygovernment.EricholdsanMSinPlanningandaBS inBusinessAdministration,MarketingandLogistics,all from theUniversityofTennessee,Knoxville.

Page 12 of 75

9

ProjectOverviewTheavailabilityofadvancedcommunicationsand technology inourcommunitieshasbecomeadetermining factor inselectingwherewelive,workandplay.ThisiswellevidencedandsupportedintheconceptualvisionoftheWolfBranchInnovation District (“District”), an area defined by a JPA for the establishment of an employment based economicidevelopmentdistrict. TheCityofMountDorahas theopportunity todevelop an Information andCommunicationsTechnology (“ICT”)Master Plan that guides theDistrict development, incorporating communications and technologyinfrastructure as a driving element to the evolution of the project, ensuring next-generation world-classtelecommunicationsservicesareavailablefromdayone.InorderfortheDistricttobedesignedasa“SmartCommunity”fromthegroundup,MountDorawillrequireawell-architectedcommunicationsandtechnologystrategytoembracetheneedsofaneco-friendly,technologicallyadvancedcommunity.ToensuretheMountDoravisionfortheWolfBranchInnovationDistrictisrealized,acomprehensiveICTMasterPlanisnecessarytoimplementlong-termSmartCommunitystrategies.ThisPlanwillplayapivotalroleindeterminingthefutureof theDistrict’s long-term communicationsand technology capabilities,andas such,MountDoraneedsa consultingpartnerthathasextensiveexperience inthesecorepracticesand is focusedona“completecommunity”approachtomaster planning. Magellan Advisors has far reaching experience with local governments, economic planners anddeveloperswithICTmasterplanning,providingfull-cycleadvisoryservicestoclientsdomesticallyandinternationally.ItisalsocriticalthatMountDoradeveloptheDistrictsothatthePlanisn’tlimitedtoanyspecifictechnology,manufacturerorserviceprovider.MagellanAdvisorswillworksolelyonbehalfofMountDoratodeveloptherightICTMasterPlanfortheneedsofMountDoraandthedevelopmentitisbuilding.Magellandoesnotsellorrepresentanytechnologycompany,manufacturer,serviceproviderorotherorganizationthatmay influencethemasterplanningprocessesforourclients’projects.Instead,weassistourclientsindevelopingmasterplansthatprovideubiquitouscommunicationsandtechnologyservices in their communities. This allows for long-term flexibility and accommodation of many different types oftechnologiesinthesecommunities,ensuringtheyarenot“lockedin”tospecificsystemsorvendors.MagellanunderstandstheuniqueneedsofSmartCommunityplanningandworkswithstakeholderstoensuretheirvisionis captured in themasterplanningprocess.Weprovide the full spectrumofcommunicationsand technologymasterplanning, includingneedsassessments,businessandorganizationalplanning,economicdevelopmentplanning,marketanalysisandresearch,designandengineering,financialplanning, implementationandprojectmanagement.Ourdeepexpertise in thesecorecompetencieswillprovideMountDorawithastrategicpartnerwhocandevelopa long-term,SmartCommunitymasterplanfortheDistrict,andotherkeyareasoftheCity.Magellan Advisors will embrace the Smart Community vision as the primary driver in designing and specifying thecommunicationsandtechnologyneeds fortheDistrict. TheproposedmasterplanwillbedesignedwithcapacityanddeliverymechanismstosupportcurrentlyproposedandpotentialSmartCommunityfeaturesoftheDistrict,including:

• SmartGridTechnology.AWolfBranchInnovationDistrictbroadbandnetworkwillfacilitatetheimplementationofSmartGridTechnologytoensurethemosteffectiveuseandmanagementofsolargenerated(andutility)powerprovidedtotheproject.Thenetworkwillconnectend-pointswithcentralmanagementsystemsandallowpowertoberedirectedfromareasoflowconsumptiontoareasofhighdemandinrealtime,thusloweringconsumptionandcosttotheenduser.

• AutomaticMeter Reading/AdvancedMetering Infrastructure. AWolfBranch InnovationDistrictbroadbandnetwork will support the implementation of Automatic Meter Reading (AMR), and Advanced MeteringInfrastucture (AMI) to further reduce the creation of carbon emissions, contribute to the District’s SmartCommunityvisionandallowforastreamlinedutilitymanagementsystem.

888 960 5299 g1g @magellan-adv1sors com Page 13 of 75

10

• UbiquitousWireless.AWolfBranchInnovationDistrictbroadbandnetworkwillsupportthecapabilitytoprovideubiquitous wireless coverage, allowing end users to access information anytime, anywhere. Additionally,ubiquitouswirelesscoveragecanfacilitateandenhancemanypublicservicesrangingfrombuildinginspections,AMR/AMI,emergencymanagementandpublic safety.Furthermore, thewirelessnetworkwillenable locale-commerce, online advertising and other mechanisms supporting economic development for citizens andbusinesses.

• Video Surveillance. A Wolf Branch Innovation District broadband network will enable a video surveillancenetwork providing support for trafficmanagement, public safety, emergencymanagement and other criticalservices.

• IntelligentTransportationSystems.AWolfBranchInnovationDistrictbroadbandnetworkwillsupportIntelligentTransportationSystemor ITS. ITSwillprovide a“smart” trafficmanagementplatform fortheDistrict,and itssurroundingarea.Fibercomponentsoftheinfrastructurewillbeleveragedtomanagetrafficsignalization,flowandreroutingutilizinganintelligentreal-timemonitoringsystem.

• Autonomous Vehicles. A Wolf Branch Innovation District broadband network will provide the criticalinfrastructure for planned Autonomous Vehicles. Fiber-based infrastructure will provide data trunks whilewireless components of the infrastructure will ensure constant communications and management of eachindividualvehicle.

• ConnectedCity.AWolfBranchInnovationDistrictbroadbandnetworkwillbedesignedtointerconnectwithothernetworksintheregionwhilesupportingMountDora’svisionoftheDistrictbeinganadvancedemploymentcenter,located within the greater Orlando metro. The network will facilitate high-speed/high-bandwidthinterconnectionbetweenothergovernmental,educational,andprivatesectornetworks,ensuringthattheDistrictwillbeoneofthemostconnecteddevelopmentsintheworld.

• Teleworkers.AWolfBranchInnovationDistrictbroadbandnetworkwillenablesmartbusinessestofullyleveragethecostsavingsofteleworkerswhilefurtheringthegreenprinciplesoftheproject.Byremovingcommutersandvehiclesfromthestreets,businesseswillenableemployeestobemoreproductiveandefficientwhilereducingtheir carbon footprint through teleworking. The network will connect employees to their businesses andbusinessestotheircustomers.

• SmartHome.AWolfBranchInnovationDistrictbroadbandnetworkwillenablethesmarthomeconcept,allowingresidentstomanagevirtuallyeveryfeatureoftheirhomeanytime,anywhere.

• Triple andQuadruple Play. Thenetwork infrastructurewillbedesigned to supportdeliveryof internet,HDtelevision,voiceandwirelessservicesseamlessly,eitherprovideddirectlybytheWolfBranchInnovationDistrictor via a third-party operating on the network through a P3 agreement. This will create potential revenuegenerationopportunitiesforMountDoraandprovideresidentswithachoiceofserviceproviders.Thenetworkwillbedesigned toaccommodatenextgeneration technologies thatwillplace theDistrict faraheadofothercommunitieswhohavenotembracedSmartCommunitymasterplanningprocesses.

• EconomicDevelopment. Themereexistenceofacomprehensivecommunity informationandcommunicatinstechnologyplatformwillgreatlyenhanceeconomicdevelopmentopportunitiesfortheWolfBranchInnovationDistrict. Availability of resources to private sector business (particularly research, high-tech, healthcare, lifesciences,greentechnologyandeducation)willimprovetheproject’slikelihoodofattractingnewindustriestothecommunity.Inaddition,afocusedICTmasterplanwillfosterthedevelopmentoflocalbusiness“ecosystems”thatcanpromotenewbusinesscreation,start-upincubatorsandothereconomicdevelopmentbenefits.

888 960 5299 g1g @magellan-adv1sors com Page 14 of 75

11

• TechnologyScalability.AWolfBranchInnovationDistrictbroadbandnetworkwillbedesignedtosupportbothshort-term and long-term demands. The networkwill be designedwith scalability inmind to support newtechnologiesandinnovationswellintothefuture,ensuringnetworkviabilityfordecadestocome.

888 960 5299 g1g @magellan-adv1sors com Page 15 of 75

12

StatementofWorkThisprojectwillcreateacomprehensiveICTMasterPlanthatwillallowMountDoratoincorporateaSmartCommunitydesignintotheDistrict.ThePlanwillenableMountDorato“futureproof”theDistrictbycreatingacommunity-wideICTstrategythatwillsecure theDistrict’sroleasaSmartCommunity,andadvancedemploymentcenter.Theprojectwillprovide comprehensive information, analysis, strategies and recommendations thatwill equipMountDorawith thenecessary informationtomake informeddecisionsonhowto invest inSmartCommunity infrastructureandprograms.ThePlanwill includemarket,business,operational,regulatory,financialandtechnicalanalysisofcommunicationsandtechnologyinfrastructurefortheDistrictandprovideablueprintforimplementingtheseopportunitiesinthelong-term.ThePlanwillfocusheavilyonthecommunicationsandnetworkcapabilitiesoftheDistrictasthesecoreareasprovidebotha foundation forSmartCommunitytechnologiesandapotentialrevenuesource forMountDora indevelopingacommunicationsutility.

TheprojectwillincludethefollowingcriticalareasrequiredforacomprehensiveICTMasterPlan:

Task1:NeedsAssessmentThisneedsassessmentwillidentifycommoncommunicationsandtechnologyneedsformanytypesofusersthatwillbepresent in theDistrict, including residential,business,enterprise,municipal,education,healthcare,public safety andcommunity support.Wewillprovidea long-term forecast for the type,capacityand locationofcommunicationsandtechnologyservicesrequiredofthesedifferentclassesofusers.Magellanwillprovideguidance,examplesandcasestudiesofvariouscommunitiesthathaveimplementedadvancedcommunicationsandtechnologyprograms.WewillhelpMountDoradeterminewhichprogramswillleadfutureinnovationtokeeptheDistrict“aheadofthecurve.”BasedonMountDora’svisionfortheDistrict,wewillhelpidentifyprogramsthatfitwithinandpromotethisvision.Task2:MarketAnalysisThismarketanaylsiswillprovidequantitativeresearchontheavailabilityofbroadband,communicationsandtechnologyservicesintheMountDoraarea,andspecifically,theareassurroundingtheDistrict.ThisisacriticalinputtotheDistrictPlantoidentifywhatservicescurrentlyexistinrelationtotheservicesthatwillberequired.ItwillbeimportantthattheDistrict’s telecommunications services are far above the standard legacy copper services that exist in surroundingcommunities.Keytothisanalysis isanunderstandingoftheregionalnetworksthatwillprovide“backhaul”servicestointerconnectwith the City and theDistrict.Where highways interconnect local roads to the regional infrastructure,backhaulservicesconnectlocalcommunicationsservicestotheelectronicworld.Thisphaseoftheprojectwilldocumentcurrentandplannedinfrastructure,identifyinterconnectionpointswithintheDistrictandplanfacilitiesthatwillenableinterconnectionwithcarriers,contentprovidersandothertelecoms. Itwillalso identify“datacenter”andco-locationfacilitiesthatmayberequiredwithintheDistricttoenhanceitsconnectivitytotheoutsideworldandpromotetheSmartCommunity,“hightech”mission.Task3:VisioningThevisioningphaseoftheprojectbuildsonthepreviouslycompletedneedsassessmentbyidentifyingtheservicesandfeaturesthatwillbeplannedfortheDistrict.Throughoutthisphase,Magellan,theCity,anditsPlanningConsultantswillworktogethertodeterminewhatcommunicationsandtechnologyservicesfitwellwithintheDistrictproject,basedonthe long-termgoalsofMountDorafortheproject.Inthisphase,wewillcovertherealmoffeaturesenabled inSmartCommunitiesasdescribedintheExecutiveSummary.

Page 16 of 75

13

Theseincludebutarenotlimitedto:

• SmartGridTechnology• AutomaticMeterReading• UbiquitousWireless• VideoSurveillance• IntelligentTransportationSystems• AutonomousVehicles• ConnectedCity• Teleworkers

• SmartHome• TripleandQuadruplePlay• EconomicDevelopment• TechnologyScalability• E-Commerce• DataCenterFacilitiesandCo-Location• NewEconomyFocus

Task4:BusinessModelDevelopmentDeterminationoftherightbusinessmodelwithintheDistrict’sICTMasterPlanwillbeessentialtoensureMountDoraidentifiesviableopportunitiesanddevelopssoundbusinessstrategiestocapturethem.MagellanwillassistMountDorainevaluatingthevariousutilitybusinessmodelsthatareavailable,identifyingtheprosandconsofeach.Wehaveworkedwithdozensofutilityproviders,privateandpublicoperators,whohaveimplementeddifferentbusinessmodels.WewillassistMountDoraindetermininghowthesemodelswillfitintotheDistrict’senvironment.Wealsounderstandhowthelegalandregulatoryenvironment influencesdifferentbusinessmodelsandwilladviseMountDoraonthese importantfacetsofutilityplanning,toensurethattheorganizationmeetsalllegalandregulatoryguidelinesinitsinitiative.Justafewofthebusinessmodelswehaveworkedwithfromourexperiencesinclude:

Provider BusinessModel DescriptionofModel

CityofRanchoCucamonga,CA

Public-PrivatePartnership(P3)

City owned fiber-optic network utilized to provide next-generationbroadbandservices tobusiness, residentsandcommunity anchors through a P3. The City has alsoconditioned all new development, so underground fiber-optic infrastructure in included in all green-fielddevelopment.

CityofPalmCoast,FL Open-AccessCity owned fiber-to-the-premise network with multipleservice providers delivering business-class services overfiberandwirelesstobusinessesandcommunityanchors.

NewportUtilities,TN RetailTriple-Play City owned municipal electric utility deployed FTTHthroughoutitselectricserviceterritoryasaretailprovider.

CityofWinterHaven,FL DarkFiberLeasing Cityownedconduitandfiberisleasedtoserviceproviders,andorganizationsonafiberstrandbasis.

MagellanAdvisorswillassistindevelopingabusinessstrategythattakesintoaccounttheshortandlong-termbusinessopportunitiesthatwillpresentthemselvesasthecommunicationsandtechnologyinfrastructurebecomesavailable.OurconsultantswillassistMountDorainidentifyingtherightpositioningthatwillbeusedtomarket,sellandoperateaworld-classSmartCommunitysystem.Thebusinessstrategywillprovideatechnicaldefinitionregardingtheattributesoftheinfrastructure.Thedefinitionsandtermsused,suchas“carrier-class”or“99.999%”,willdefinethelevelofacceptanceandultimatesuccessofthisnetworkwithinthecommunity. Basedontheneedsassessmentandtechnicaldesignforservices,MagellanwillassistMountDorainthedefinitionofitsserviceofferingsandthemessagingthatwillbeprovidedtothemarketregardingtheseservices,asdetailedintheMarketingProgramandDevelopmentsection.WewillassisttheCityinforgingthecorrectmessagingabouttheDistrictsICTPlan.

Page 17 of 75

14

Task5:MarketingProgramandDevelopmentBased on the needs assessment, and vision developed through themaster planning process,Magellanwill define amarketingprogramwhichMountDoracanusetocommunicatethevisionoftheDistrict,emphasizingitscommunicationsandtechnologyinfrastructure.WewillassistMountDoraindevelopinganeffectivemarketingandcommunicationsplanthatwillallowtheCitytodelivertherightmessagingtoitstargetmarketanduseSmartCommunityfeaturesthroughoutitsmarketingcampaigns.Wewillfocuson:

• PromotingtheDistrictasaSmartCommunity;• IdentifyandimplementeffectivemessagingabouttheSmartCommunity;• WorktosocializetheDistrict’splanwithindustryandvendorsthatcouldhaveinterestinpartneringwiththeCity

todriveinnovationwithinthearea;• ProvidedetaileddiagramsandschematicsoftheSmartCommunity;and,• IdentifySmartCommunitytargetmarketsforbusinessandindustry.

Task6:SmartCommunityIntegrationSmartCommunitydesignrequiresthatallcommunicatinsandtechnology initiativesbeplannedasasingle, integratedsystem.Buildingonthe largerTechnicalPlan,thisareawill focusondevelopingright integrationbetweenthevarioustechnologies that are proposed for the communications and technology system.We approach integration from the“ground up” by first developing a foundation of technologies that will be used within the District. Building on thisfoundation,wewilloverlaytheapplicationsthatwillbedeployed,ensuringeachapplicationfitswithinthetechnologyfoundation.Task7:CommunicationsandTechnologyTechnicalPlanThisphaseoftheplanwillcreateatechnicaldesignfortheDistrict,basedontheassessmentandtheobjectivesoftheproject.ThePlanwillincludethefollowing:

• OutsideandInsidePlant• UtilityeasementsandROWplanning• Towersitelocationsandplanning(micro

andmacro)• SmartStreetLighting• Fiber-OpticandWirelessOptions• CentralOffice/DataCenterDesign• Core,DistributionandEdgeNetwork

Elements

• CustomerPremiseEquipmentOptions• Protocols,RoutingandServiceDelivery• QOS,SecurityandAccounting• HighAvailabilityandRedundancy• OperationalSupportSystems• BusinessSupportSystems• InventoryManagementSystems

Thedesignwillbeprovidedwithacompletesetofengineeringdiagrams illustratingthedifferent layersofthesystem,including:

• Physicalfiber/wirelessdesignandmileage• Networkelementdesignandlocation• IPlayerdesignforrouting/switching• Bandwidthandcapacity• Centraloffice/Datacenterlayoutand

engineering

• Interconnectionpoints• Towerlocations(microandmacro)• Leasedfacilitiesforwireline/wireless

services

WewillprovidealldiagramsinConceptDrawformatandincorporategeographicinformationintoGoogleEarthandESRIformatsforusebyMountDoraandincorporationintotheclient’sGISsystem.

Page 18 of 75

15

Task8:CommunicationsandTechnologyOperationsPlanTheoperationsplanfortheDistrictmustprovideefficientandcosteffectiveO&Mforthecommunicationsandtechnologyinfrastructure. Itwill detailmanagement level strategies on structuring the operations andmanaging personnel andsystem resources. It is possible for these operational roles to be pushed onto a P3 partner given the appropriatebroadbandbusinessmodel.Areasoftheoperationsplaninclude:

• BSS/OSS• Provisioning• Capacitymanagement• Orderfulfillment

• Servicelevelmanagement• Contactandescalation• Projectmanagement• Resourceutilization

Task9:CommunicationsandTechnologyFinancialPlan

ThefinancialplanwillprovideextensivefinancialmodelingofthevariousbusinessmodelstoallowMountDoratounderstandtheperformanceofdifferentoptionsforbuildingandoperatingacommunicationsandtechnologyutility. ItwillallowMountDoratomake informeddecisionsabout ifandhowto invest insuchautilityunderowner/operator,leaseholdandhybridmodels.Wewillexplorethefinancialimpactsofusingclosed-accessversusopen-accessnetworksandhoweachofthesewillimpactthecommunityandfinancialoutcomesoftheproject.Inourfinancialmodels,weprovideallfinancialcomponentsrelatedtothecommunicationsandtechnologyutilityusinglong-rangeplanningtools(10-20year),includingafullsetofpro-formastatementsandfinancialanalysis.Financialsinclude:

• Pro-formafinancialstatements,includingbalancesheets,incomestatements,cash-flowstatementsandownerequitystatements

• Capitalandoperationalbudgets• Revenueandcostmodels• Customerforecasts

• Serviceforecasts• Debtfinancingandamortization

worksheets• Financialratioanalysis• Financingalternatives,debt,equityand

grants

Task10:LicensesandAgreementsThissectionwillprovidedetailedanalysisofbothStateandFederalregulatorystatutesconcerningcommunicationsandtechnologyutilities.MagellanstaffhasanextensivebackgroundinthetelecomregulatoryarenaandcanprovideguidancetoMountDoraonthesematters,helpingtoensurecompliancewithStateandFederallaws,includingcompliancewiththeFCC,USAC,DepartmentofRevenueandPublicServiceCommission.Inthissection,wewillalsoprovideasetofcoreservicedocumentsthatwillberequiredforoperatingthecommunicationsandtechnologyutility,includingacoresetofagreementsandcontractsforservices.Theseinclude:

• BroadbandServicesAgreements• MasterServiceAgreements• ServiceLevelAgreements

• AcceptableUsePolicies• Easement/RightofEntryAgreements• OtherDocumentsasNeeded

Page 19 of 75

16

ProjectDeliverablesAlldocumentsfortheprojectwillbedeliveredinpaperandelectroniccopy.Thedeliverablesforthisprojectinclude:

1. TheWolfBranchInnovationDistrictICTMasterPlan;2. Financialmodeloutputs;3. Marketingmaterial, languageandbrochures tobeused inprintandwebadvertising theDistrictas a “Smart

Community;”4. Attachedsetsofconceptualengineeringdiagramsanddesignsprovidingtechnicaldesignofthesystem(s);5. AttachedmapspresentedinGoogleEarthprovidingGIS-enableddesignandoverviewofthesystem;6. Managementlevelpresentationsonthestatusoftheprojectandsubjectareas;7. Periodicupdatemeetingsthroughoutthetermoftheproject;8. Aforward-lookingdocumenttodeterminethenextstepsafterprojectcompletion;and,9. Theprojectwillnotincludefinaldesignengineeringplans.

ProjectTimelineBased on the sizeof and scopeof the StrategicPlan,we estimate theproject tobe completed in fivemonths.Ourconsulting teamsareable tobegin thisprojectasearlyas July15,2018.Thechartbelow illustrates the timelineandmilestonesformainthecomponentsoftheproject.

Weestimatethatoverthefive-monthdurationoftheproject,approximatelytwodaysonsiteeachmonthwillberequiredfor successful completion of the project. During this time, Magellan will meet with City staff, hold meetings withstakeholders,andperformsitevisits. Inaddition,ourteamwillmakepresentationstoMountDoraprojectteamsandstaff, as well as other activities to be determined between the City and Magellan. Schedules will be determinedcooperativelybetween theCityandMagellan.MagellanwillrequireCityresources togatherrelevantprojectdata, toconductinterviewswithCitystaff,andtoparticipateonstatuscalls,onsitemeetings,andanyfinalpresentations.

888 960 5299 g1g @magellan-adv1sors com Page 20 of 75

17

DescriptionMonthà

1 2 3 4 5 6

Assessments• NeedsAnalysis• InfrastructureReview• CommunityVisioning

BusinessPlanning• BusinessDevelopment• BusinessModelAnalysis• SWOTAnalysis• RiskAnalysis• StrategicPlanning

TechnicalPlanning• Outside/InsidePlant• TechnologyIdentification• BaselineRouting• FacilityRequirements• Topology• NetworkDesign• Engineering

OperationalPlanning• BSS/OSS• ServiceLevelAgreements• BusinessDocuments• NetworkManagement• OperationsManagement

FinancialPlanning• Pro-FormaFinancials• CostModeling• Capex/Opex• FinancialAnalysis• Cost-BenefitAnalysis• TCO/ROI

PresentPlantoCityLeadership

Page 21 of 75

18

CostProposalMagellanAdvisorswillbillinmonthlyinstallmentsastheengagementisexecuted.Magellanwillbillonthefirstdayofthemonth.Travelandincidentalexpenseswillbebilledasincurred,witha10%administrativefee.Magellan’sperdiemrateformealsis$65perdayforfullworkdays.Invoicesarepayablenet30termsfromthedateofinvoice.Thetotalcostoftheprojectis$37,500andincludesallworktobecompletedbyMagellanforMountDoraasstatedinthisProposaloverthe5-monthtimeframe. Magellan’shourlyrateforthisplanningengagement is$150perhour,inaccordancewiththeCityofClermont’s2017CSA,Telecommunications/BroadbandPlanninghourlyrate.

Item FixedPrice

ICTMasterPlan(250hoursestimated) $37,500

ClientResponsibilitiesThefollowingclientresponsibilitieshelpensurethatthemasterplanningprojectisexecutedonscheduleandwithminimaldelays.

• ProvideadequatestaffresourcestoMagellanpersonnelworkingontheproject;• Ensure thatMountDora staffworkingwithMagellanhave suitable knowledgeabout the subjectmatterand

understandtheproject;• ProvideadequateinformationtoMagellanpersonnel,including,butnotlimitedtothefollowingdata:

o Maps of the Wolf Branch area, including key areas of the planned development, residential units,commercialunits,anchors,roads,utilitiesandotherkeyplannedinfrastructure;

• Provide adequate physical access to Magellan personnel for site visits to facilities, outside/inside plantinfrastructureandotherclientownedoroperatedareas;and,

• ProcessanychangestotheengagementorscopeofworkbetweenMagellanandMountDora,intimelyfashion.

Page 22 of 75

19

Signature&AcceptanceSignatureofthisProposalbytheClientwarrantsthatallcomponentsofthisProposalareacceptabletotheCityofMountDoraandthattheperson(s)signingthisProposalhastheright,powerandauthoritytoexecutetheProposal.

MagellanAdvisors,LLCAFloridaLimitedLiabilityCompany99918thStreet,Suite3000Denver,CO80202

CityofMountDora,FL

PrintName:CourtneyS.Violette PrintName:

Title:COO Title:Signature: Signature:

Date:June25,2018 Date:

Page 23 of 75

September 21, 2018 

Johnna Shamblin, CCIO Information Technology Manager City of Mount Dora P.O. Box 176 Mount Dora, FL 32756‐0176 

Via email: [email protected]  

Subject: Proposal to develop a fiber business plan for the Wolf Branch Innovation District 

Dear Johnna: 

I enjoyed meeting with you earlier this month and learning about your plans for the Wolf Branch Innovation District. As we discussed, CTC Technology & Energy (CTC) is pleased to present this proposal  to  support  the  City  with  fiber  business  planning.  I  have  also  included  background information regarding our decades of experience working for local governments on broadband strategy, broadband business planning, and network engineering.  

As a matter of philosophy, CTC is a public interest‐focused consultancy. We work exclusively for public,  cooperative,  and  other  non‐profit  entities  and  have  no  financial  relationships  with equipment manufacturers,  construction  companies,  or  systems  integrators. We will  be  your independent, objective adviser—and will be guided by your goals, priorities, and risk tolerance. 

Our recommendations and  insights are based on each  individual client’s needs, objectives, and 

market situation. We perform custom research and analysis for each client—and, as a result, limit our engagements to ensure that each client receives our full attention.  

Please do not hesitate to contact me with questions or comments about our proposal. We look forward to the opportunity to work with you and your colleagues on this important initiative. 

Best Regards, 

Tom Asp  Principal Engineer and Analyst

ATTACHMENT #2

Page 24 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

ii  

 

Contents1.  Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 

2.  Statement of Work ................................................................................................................. 2 

Task 1: Strategic Analysis – Facilitate an on‐site project kick‐off and strategy workshop ......... 3 

Task 2: Network Design and Cost Estimate ................................................................................ 4 

Network Design ....................................................................................................................... 4 

Cost Estimate .......................................................................................................................... 5 

Task 3: Market Sounding – Conduct teleconferences with potential business customers and providers ..................................................................................................................................... 5 

Task 4: Business Modeling and Financial Analysis ...................................................................... 6 

Analyze Fiber Network Business Model ................................................................................. 6 

Develop Financial Model ........................................................................................................ 7 

Task 5: Comprehensive Report ................................................................................................... 8 

3.  Project Fees ............................................................................................................................. 9 

4.  CTC’s Qualifications............................................................................................................... 10 

Experience and Expertise .......................................................................................................... 10 

Thought Leadership .................................................................................................................. 10 

Commitment to Meeting Our Clients’ Needs ........................................................................... 11 

5.  Key Team Members .............................................................................................................. 12 

6.  Demonstrated Experience – Project Descriptions ................................................................ 14 

City of Atlanta ....................................................................................................................... 14 

City of Bloomington, Indiana ................................................................................................ 15 

City of Boston ........................................................................................................................ 15 

Garrett County, Maryland ..................................................................................................... 16 

Town of Holly Springs, North Carolina .................................................................................. 16 

City of Huntsville, Alabama ................................................................................................... 17 

City of Lexington, Kentucky .................................................................................................. 17 

City of Madison, Wisconsin ................................................................................................... 17 

City of Ocala, Florida ............................................................................................................. 17 

Page 25 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

iii  

 

City of Palo Alto, California ................................................................................................... 18 

City and County of San Francisco .......................................................................................... 19 

City of Seattle and Seattle City Light ..................................................................................... 19 

Cities of Urbana and Champaign / University of Illinois (UC2B Network) ............................ 20 

City of Westminster, Maryland ............................................................................................. 21 

7.  References ............................................................................................................................ 23 

Appendix A: CTC Staff Resumes .................................................................................................... 24 

Joanne S. Hovis, Esq. | President and Director of Business Consulting ................................... 24 

Andrew Afflerbach, Ph.D., P.E. | CEO and Chief Technology Officer ....................................... 28 

Thomas J. Asp, BSEE, MBA | Principal Engineer and Analyst ................................................... 33 

Matthew DeHaven | Principal Engineer and Project Manager ................................................ 37 

Eric Wirth | Senior Project Engineer ......................................................................................... 41 

 

 

Page 26 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

1  

 

1. IntroductionCTC is an established national consulting firm that offers a unique combination of qualifications and capabilities in  broadband  financial  analysis,  business  planning, engineering, and network strategic planning. Founded in 1983,  we  have  extensive  experience  providing independent financial, strategic, and technical, guidance for  public  and  non‐profit  communications  efforts, including  those  of  state  and  local  governments,  non‐profit  consortia,  universities,  and  cooperative  and municipal utilities. 

CTC  is  a  highly  respected  firm  with  considerable experience  and  intellectual  resources.  Our  reputation rests  on  our  track  record  of  providing  independent, objective, and unbiased guidance. For more than three decades,  we  have  served  the  non‐profit  and  public sectors in evaluating broadband deployment efforts and in bringing an  independent,  sometimes critical, eye  to communications efforts.  

 

We are in an industry that is 

changing by the day with 

respect to regulatory 

frameworks, technology, and 

potential business models. 

What distinguishes CTC is that 

we perform custom analysis 

for every client, developing 

new strategies for leveraging 

public and private sector 

investment to enable 

sustainable last‐mile 

connectivity.

Page 27 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

2  

 

2. StatementofWorkCTC will work with the City to develop a comprehensive financial model, business strategy, and public‐private  partnership  strategy  for  the  City’s  planned  dark  fiber  assets  and  colocation facilities. The following is a summary of the tasks we propose to undertake: 

1. Based  on  our  experience  designing middle‐mile  dark  fiber  networks  to meet  defined needs, we will develop prepare a system‐level design and cost estimate for a dark fiber backbone and colocation facilities. 

2. We will develop  a  framework business  structure designed  to  secure  the City’s public policy goals for broadband while mitigating its risk through collaboration with the private sector.  

3. We will develop a full financial model for the City’s fiber operations so that City leadership can understand the financial ramifications of the dark fiber effort. Our 20‐year financial analysis will project how much revenue the City will require to achieve positive ongoing cash flow. We will analyze both a base case and a range of different scenarios to illustrate the model’s sensitivities and risks.  

4. To test the viability of the revenue requirements, we will conduct a series of targeted conversations with potential partners  to ascertain  interest  in  leasing City‐owned  fiber along existing or planned routes. These conversations will enable determination of the viability of the effort and will help the City understand its financial risks before it commits to expanding its middle‐mile fiber. 

CTC will be the City’s independent adviser. As a matter of policy, we have no financial stake in the City’s decisions; we do not seek to construct or operate the City’s network.  

Our  project  approach  involves  methodical  research,  rigorous  analysis,  and  regular communication, and is structured as follows: 

Task 1: Strategic workshop and determination of parameters and goals 

Task 2: Network design and cost estimate (develop high‐level design to support business modeling) 

Task 3: Market sounding (seek to identify partner interest) 

Task 4: Business modeling and financial analysis (refine approach and explore options for public–private partnerships) 

Task 5: Comprehensive report (develop analysis and recommendations) 

Page 28 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

3  

 

Each of these tasks is described in more detail below. 

Task 1: Strategic Analysis – Facilitate an on‐site project kick‐off and strategyworkshopAs a preliminary step, we will conduct an on‐site strategy session. Our project leader will meet with  City  personnel  and  invited  stakeholders  to  discuss  project  goals  and  objectives,  review 

relevant maps and documents, establish project parameters, and address  the project  team’s primary questions and concerns.  

Our goal in this task will be to develop a full understanding of the City’s planned middle‐mile dark fiber and colocation facilities (including the location of the colocation facilities). The insights we gather will inform the development of a series of tentative business model options based on the City’s strategy and fiber design, as well as our further analysis and recommendations. 

In particular, we will  look at potential configurations  for public‐private collaboration,  such as whether to grant a single entity an exclusive right to dark fiber on the condition that it offer open access at the lit service layer—and at pricing that is calculated to enable other entities to enter the market. This is the approach we negotiated with KINBER and Sunesys (now Crown Castle) for the statewide network in Pennsylvania.  

We also view  the strategy session as an opportunity  to present an overview of  relevant case studies and best practices  in public  sector broadband, and  to discuss  funding,  financing, and partnership issues. 

Specific agenda items will include: 

• Introduce team  

• Identify project stakeholders and roles, particularly among City staff 

• Review project schedule, key milestones, and deliverables 

Provide a briefing on public sector fiber networks elsewhere in the United States, based on our experience with these projects and the existing and emerging business/financial models under which they operate 

Ascertain the potential range of users and related capacity requirements for the City’s existing and planned infrastructure 

• Share relevant maps, studies, and documents 

• Discuss potential City roles in network deployment and operations 

Page 29 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

4  

 

• Discuss potential risks and benefits related to fiber construction 

• Discuss potential revenue streams possible with fiber deployment 

• Discuss potential partnership approaches 

Task2:NetworkDesignandCostEstimateWe understand that the City’s planned fiber deployment model includes: 

1. Constructing middle‐mile fiber to the Wolf Branch Innovation District 

2. Building at least two colocation facilities (i.e., caged racks and power)  

3. Constructing  fiber  from the colocation  facilities to each multi‐dwelling unit  (MDU) and into each defined neighborhood for future residential service to single‐family units (SFU) 

4. Leasing  dark  fiber  and  colocation  space  to  private  entities  that  would  then  add electronics,  deploy  in‐building  infrastructure  (MDUs)  and  last‐mile  residential infrastructure (SFU), and deliver retail services to residents and businesses 

To support this vision, CTC’s engineers will prepare a system‐level design and cost estimate for a dark fiber backbone and colocation facilities. The design will seek to cost‐effectively connect key sites  identified by the City (potentially  including government facilities, anchor  institutions, and public  safety entities), and  to  support  future  last‐mile deployment and  services  to economic development target areas, MDUs, and last‐mile SFU residential deployment.  

To be clear, we will not be providing a blueprint‐level network design or cost estimate. Rather, we will be providing a conceptual design, high‐level maps, and a system‐level overview of the potential infrastructure—which in turn will become a roadmap for financial analysis and business modeling, and for future decisions (potentially including detailed engineering). 

NetworkDesignAs  an  initial  step,  we  will  review  City‐provided  GIS  data  and  other  relevant  maps,  studies, documents, or data that the City can share with us during the strategic workshop (including the location of the planned colocation facilities). A CTC outside plant engineer will then conduct an extensive desk survey using the City’s GIS maps, Google Earth imagery, and other sources. 

We will include in our engineering analysis existing public infrastructure (including utility poles, fiber,  and  conduit,  but  also  rights‐of‐way  access  and  locations  for  network  hubs  and  other necessary infrastructure) that we believe the City can use to support deployment.  

Page 30 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

5  

 

CostEstimateCTC will prepare cost estimates and supporting documentation  for  fiber deployment and  the implementation of the colocation facilities, inclusive of anticipated construction labor, materials, engineering, permitting, pole attachment licensing, quality control, and testing.  

Supporting documentation will include summary tables of key project metrics generated for cost estimation purposes,  including estimated  fiber plant mileage  and  anticipated percentages of aerial versus underground construction. Additionally, CTC will provide a narrative to explain key construction characteristics that impact the cost estimates. 

Our intent is that the cost estimates will allow the City to inform future cost estimates for detailed engineering of specific phases, as well as  to properly scope construction phases according  to particular budgetary constraints. 

As is typical in this phase of a fiber construction project, the cost estimates will not be based on a detailed design, environmental assessment, or geotechnical analysis of soil composition. As a result, actual costs may vary due to unknown factors, including: 1) costs of private easements, 2) utility pole replacement and make ready costs, and 3) subsurface hard rock. We will, of course, incorporate suitable assumptions to address these items based on our experience. 

Task 3: Market Sounding – Conduct teleconferences with potential businesscustomersandprovidersWe recommend reaching out individually to vetted stakeholders—in this case, businesses located in or near the Wolf Branch Innovation District that might be potential dark fiber customers or potential partners—to seek to develop quantitative and qualitative data and insights into their likely interest in the City’s dark fiber. We will facilitate up to eight one‐on‐one teleconferences with businesses identified by the City. 

We will also seek to speak directly to a small sample of “alternative” service providers, which in our  experience  are  generally  more  interested  in  learning  about  municipal  dark  fiber  lease opportunities than are the traditional service providers. We will identify these contacts. 

In this task, we will draw on the insights we develop in project strategy discussions with the City, as well as our extensive experience soliciting industry and customer input related to dark fiber leasing  and  public  sector  broadband  partnerships. We will  be  prepared  to  outline  the City’s current state and future goals, and to effectively communicate the City’s range of interests.  

Our goal will be to develop an understanding of whether and to what extent there may be a market for City‐built and operated dark fiber—and whether the City might reasonably be able to 

Page 31 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

6  

 

secure a long‐term commitment from a private partner that would maximize the potential of that infrastructure while minimizing the City’s risk.  

Task4:BusinessModelingandFinancialAnalysisBased on our analysis of  the  input we may receive as a result of direct outreach to potential partners, we will develop and refine a recommended business model to reflect the  identified demand for the City’s dark fiber. 

Our  analysis  will  consider  a  range  of  business  models—with  a  focus  on  public‐private partnerships  (P3)—that  might  support  the  City’s  next  steps.  Our  analysis  will  reflect  our understanding of the City’s desired roles and risk tolerances.  

As we have done for public sector broadband networks nationwide, we will develop a financial model (pro forma data) for the City’s fiber network operations based on the existing system‐level design and related cost estimates. 

These financial projections will also include a risk assessment. We will identify requirements (e.g., financial, staffing, business and technical expertise needed) and evaluate factors that would be affected by the business model.  

AnalyzeFiberNetworkBusinessModelWe will bring to this engagement our experience in identifying the challenges of public sector network operations and expansion—and our realistic approach to assessing project risks. We will be very frank about the  level of funding needed for various  levels of network expansion, and  about  the  trade‐offs  among  risk,  benefits,  and  network  control  in  various  partnership approaches. 

Notably, we have singular experience in developing broadband public–private partnerships on behalf of public sector clients. For both the Town of Holly Springs, North Carolina, and the City of  Westminster,  Maryland,  we  assisted  the  municipal  governments  in  identifying  a  private partner  to  assume operating  risk  in providing  services  to  the public under  two  significantly different partnership models, each aligned with the unique needs of these communities. We are also providing broadband P3 strategic and technical consulting to the cities of Baton Rouge, La.; Boulder, Colo.; Huntsville, Ala., and Madison, Wis. 

We will assess and provide guidance on variations on this business model that might support the City’s next steps and  inform an  implementation roadmap. We will consider  the strategies we believe are relevant to the City’s desired role and its risk tolerance.  

Page 32 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

7  

 

DevelopFinancialModelBased on our consideration of potential partnership approaches and demand for dark fiber leases and colocation space, we will next develop a business case and financial analysis model for use of  the City’s dark  fiber  and  colocation  facilities.  The high‐level  financial model  for  the City’s proposed infrastructure will take into account a range of likely costs, including:  

• Capital investment and additional assets required • Financing • Operations, maintenance, and repair 

We  will  outline  operational  attributes  and  processes  including  policies,  staffing  levels, maintenance agreements, and other considerations. Particular attention will be paid to financing and  funding  sources and approaches, as well as operating  requirements and working  capital projections. We will discuss a strategy  for  fiber maintenance and management based on best practices. 

The pro forma will follow accounting standards and will provide schedules that detail: 

Operating income and cash flow  Net present value analysis  Lease revenue  Debt service analysis and reserve fund requirements  Uses and sources of funds  Operating expenses and savings  Depreciation summary  Projected construction costs for network, hardware, buildings, and other equipment  Return on investment (ROI) 

Our assumptions and price sensitivities (particularly around dark fiber and colocation leases) will be  clearly  stated  and  justified.  This  financial  model  will  provide  the  City  with  an  order‐of‐magnitude estimate of overall costs (i.e., construction, operations), and will support a phased implementation roadmap by providing inputs for potential business models, financing options, and partnering opportunities. 

As  our  references  can  attest,  our  financial  analyses  are  based  on  reasonable  assumptions regarding potential  costs  (capital  and operating)  and  revenue,  and  are extremely detailed  in terms of taking into consideration the financial implications of staffing, maintenance contracts, and so on. 

In addition to our narrative report, we will provide the City with a detailed Excel workbook that includes underlying data and assumptions, and can be manipulated to  illustrate the  impact of changing costs or revenue on the network’s potential income statement.  

Page 33 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

8  

 

Task5:ComprehensiveReportOur final deliverable will be a comprehensive report that recommends a strategic approach and a  roadmap  of  actions  for  the  City’s  consideration.  We  will  evaluate  the  benefits,  risks,  and implications of the City’s options in light of the financial analysis. The report will include the data, maps, insights, and recommendations developed in the previous tasks.  

We will provide the City with an electronic draft of our report, which will include an executive summary and a narrative supported by tables, graphics, and GIS‐compatible maps as appropriate.  

We will be available  to discuss  the  report with City  staff via  teleconference, will  incorporate feedback from reviewers, and will deliver an electronic version of the final report.  

Page 34 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

9  

 

3. ProjectFeesCTC proposes to perform the professional services described in the scope of work above for the not‐to‐exceed cost of $35,000, including travel. We will bill our work at the following hourly rates: 

Labor Category  Rate 

Chief Technology Officer  $175 Director of Business Consulting  $175 Principal Analyst / Engineer  $165 Senior Project Analyst / Engineer  $155 Senior Analyst / Engineer  $145 Staff Analyst / Engineer  $135 Communications Aide / Engineer Aide  $80 

 

Local travel is billed at current standard mileage rates. Non‐routine expenses and long‐distance travel are recovered at direct cost with no mark‐up. 

 

 

 

 

Page 35 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

10  

 

4. CTC’sQualificationsExperienceandExpertiseCTC offers extensive experience and expertise in all aspects of strategic and business planning, feasibility studies, needs assessment, and network engineering. We have developed broadband business strategy—including market surveys, business plans, engineering analyses, and financial pro  formas—for  public  sector  clients  nationwide,  including  the  cities  of  Atlanta,  Palo  Alto, Raleigh, San Francisco, Santa Cruz, and Seattle.  

Many of our engagements have focused on  low‐risk non‐profit and public sector strategies to expand  existing  broadband  infrastructure  to  close  the  digital  divide,  promote  economic development,  enhance  the  availability  of  high‐bandwidth  services  to  local  businesses,  and increase broadband competition.  

We specialize  in helping  local governments and municipal utilities develop phased approaches for  implementing  fiber  networks  to  meet  their  needs;  we  are  particularly  experienced  with helping to develop strategies for risk sharing among multiple partners, including, in some cases, for‐profit service providers that utilize publicly owned assets. Our goal in these engagements is to develop strategies in which the service provider partner shares the risk of expanding a network to serve  the public sector’s broader needs.  In  these engagements,  too, we are vigilant about protecting our public sector clients’  interests, and managing their risk with respect to partner financing and operations. 

ThoughtLeadershipWe are also thought leaders in the range of business and technical issues around non‐profit and public  sector  broadband  deployment.  CTC  principals  Joanne  Hovis  and  Andrew  Afflerbach authored “Gigabit Communities,” an independent white paper on gigabit‐facilitation strategies commissioned by Google.1 Ms. Hovis co‐authored “The Emerging World of Broadband Public–Private  Partnerships:  A  Business  Strategy  and  Legal  Guide”  (published  by  the  Benton Foundation).2  

Ms. Hovis has testified multiple times before committees of the United States Congress on topics regarding the economics of broadband deployment, particularly  in rural areas. Most recently, she presented testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives’ Committee on Energy and 

                                                       1  See  www.Gigabit‐Communities.com.  This  work  was  supported  by  Google  in  furtherance  of  CTC’s  broadband advocacy mission. Under the terms of the relationship with Google, CTC’s analysis was entirely  independent and focused  on  promoting  public  sector  and  non‐profit  needs,  rather  than  those  of  Google  or  any  other  network deployer. We are proud of our strong working relationship with Google Fiber, but maintain independence as part of our mission to serve non‐profit and public sector clients. 2 https://www.benton.org/sites/default/files/partnerships.pdf  

Page 36 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

11  

 

Commerce,  Subcommittee  on  Communications  and  Technology,  on  “Broadband:  Deploying America’s 21st Century Infrastructure.”3 

Ms. Hovis and Dr. Afflerbach co‐authored, with the New America Foundation’s Open Technology Institute, a report on local broadband networks: “The Art of the Possible: An Overview of Public Broadband  Options.”4  That  study  was  cited  in  the  White  House  report  on  municipal  fiber networks, “Community‐based Broadband Solutions: The Benefits of Competition and Choice for Community Development and High Speed Internet Access.”5 

Dr. Afflerbach’s study on the likely deployment costs of building fiber optics to every school and library  in the nation was cited and relied upon by the FCC  in  its E‐rate modernization order of 2015. 

Ms. Hovis, Dr. Afflerbach, and other CTC staff have also authored guides on community  fiber development  for  the  Utilities  Telecommunications  Council,  and  the  Tennessee  Valley  Public Power Association. These and other key documents are available in the library on our website.6 

CommitmenttoMeetingOurClients’NeedsWe have a  robust  roster of national and  international clients, and our workload  reflects  that success. As we have proven over the past three decades, however, we are adept at managing our clients’ needs  and our  staffing  levels. We pride ourselves on our  track  record of  completing projects  on  time,  regardless  of  the  size  or  complexity  of  the  tasks  at  hand.  We  commit  to providing an exceptional level of service and to meeting your timeline. 

Engaging with CTC means receiving customized analysis and the level of time, consideration, and care required to provide you with the answers you need. This level of service is complemented by  our  proven  ability  to  communicate  our  findings  and  recommendations—in  high‐quality written  reports  and  engaging  in‐person  presentations—to  decision‐makers,  elected  officials, citizens, and other interested project stakeholders. 

                                                       3 http://www.ctcnet.us/blog/ctc‐president‐joanne‐hovis‐testifies‐before‐u‐s‐house‐subcommittee‐broadband‐deploying‐americas‐21st‐century‐infrastructure/  4 http://www.ctcnet.us/publications/the‐art‐of‐possible‐an‐overview‐of‐public‐broadband‐options/  5http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/community‐based_broadband_report_by_executive_office_of_the_president.pdf 6 www.CTCnet.us/library 

Page 37 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

12  

 

5. KeyTeamMembersCTC  has  a  team  of  37  engineers,  analysts, GIS  specialists,  technical writers,  technicians,  and support staff. The following are brief descriptions of a sample of our project team; resumes for each are attached in Appendix A below, and additional staff resumes are available on request. 

Tom Asp, MBA, Principal Engineer and Analyst, will be the project manager and will  lead the business analysis and financial planning tasks. He is regarded as one of the premier analysts in the United States  in the field of municipal planning and deployment of broadband systems to meet economic development, digital inclusion, and other needs. Mr. Asp has more than 25 years of  nationwide  experience  as  an  engineer  and  analyst  in  communications  and  public  power systems. His experience  includes telecommunication system design and evaluation of network feasibility. Mr. Asp has developed financial statements and prepared quantitative business plan analyses for numerous municipal and utility clients nationwide and  is widely recognized as an expert in municipal broadband business and strategic planning. Mr. Asp has served as lead for more  than 100  local  government broadband projects during his  career—both with CTC  and, previously,  as  a  partner  at  the  public  accounting  firm  Baker  Tilley—and  brings  a  wealth  of practical fiber optic business planning experience to his projects.  

Joanne Hovis, CTC’s President and Director of Business Consulting, will be the senior project adviser and will oversee all strategic and business planning tasks. An attorney who has provided network business model analysis and recommendations for some of the largest non‐profit and public  broadband  networks  in  the  country,  she  is  a  recognized  authority  on  the  broadband market  and  community  broadband  topics—and  on  the  evolving  role  of  government  in  the provision  of  communications  services  to  the  public.  She  has  testified  multiple  times  before congressional  committees  regarding broadband policy matters. She has extensive experience developing  business  case  and  business  model  scenarios  for  non‐profit  and  public  sector broadband  initiatives.  She  leads  the  CTC  team  that  advises  the  states  of  Connecticut,  New 

Mexico,  Kentucky,  Massachusetts,  and  Kansas,  the  cities  of  San  Francisco,  Seattle,  and Washington,  D.C.,  and  the  statewide  broadband  networks  in  Colorado,  Maryland,  and Pennsylvania.  

Andrew Afflerbach, Ph.D., P.E., CTC’s Chief Technology Officer, will be senior technical project adviser and will oversee all technical research and analysis. Dr. Afflerbach served as technical adviser to the government of New Zealand in its nationwide FTTP initiative, where he developed the reference architecture for the effort and led the specification and procurement strategy. He has planned and specified fiber optic and wireless networks for large cities, counties, and regions, and  conceived  and  developed  the  super‐regional  interoperable  fiber  optic  network  in  the National Capital Region (including the District of Columbia, Maryland, Virginia, and 22 large local communities). He is an experienced network planner who understands the business and financial 

Page 38 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

13  

 

implications of various network designs. He also  leads the technical team conducting FirstNet planning for the District of Columbia. Dr. Afflerbach serves as a member of SAFECOM and  is a licensed Professional Engineer. 

Matthew DeHaven, Principal Engineer and Project Lead, has designed thousands of miles of OSP fiber networks  in urban and  rural geographies across 10 states. He  is currently managing  the deployment of an FTTP network in Westminster, Maryland. He previously served as the Portfolio Manager  for  the  One  Maryland  Inter‐County  Broadband  Network;  as  the  lead  technical consultant  on  that  project,  he  oversaw  the  use  of  approximately  $100  million  in  grant  and matching  funds  to  build  approximately  800  miles  of  fiber  optics  and  directly  connect approximately  650  community  anchor  institutions,  including  schools,  libraries,  government buildings, community colleges, and public safety agencies. 

Eric  Wirth,  CTC  Principal  Engineer,  has  almost  15  years  of  communications  engineering experience; he specializes in evaluating broadband (video, voice, and data) telecommunications networks, analyzing emerging broadband technologies, and designing broadband networks for institutional uses. In addition, Eric has developed fiber network designs and cost estimates for CTC clients including the cities of Atlanta, Boulder, Madison, and Palo Alto. He has an engineering degree from the University of Virginia. 

 

Page 39 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

14  

 

6. DemonstratedExperience–ProjectDescriptionsThe following project descriptions illustrate CTC’s demonstrated experience in network planning, engineering, business modeling, business planning,  feasibility analysis, and  financial planning. These are just a few of our hundreds of successful client engagements, supporting clients ranging 

from small towns to large cities. Many additional project examples are available on request. 

City of Atlanta 

CTC  currently  is  advising  the  City  on  strategic  and  tactical approaches  it  can  take  to  plan,  build,  and  operate  a  citywide backbone  fiber  network  to  cost‐effectively  serve  its  internal needs,  and  enable  competition  and  improved  services  in  the City’s residential and business broadband markets.  

Notably, we are guiding the City  in  its ongoing discussions with Google  Fiber,  Verizon,  AT&T,  and  other  telecommunications providers  about  options  for  joint  builds  and  other  potential partnership  approaches.  Our  support  includes  technical,  financial,  and  strategic  planning expertise. 

In the beginning phases of this long‐term engagement, we evaluated the City’s existing network infrastructure and designed the fiber component of  its  large‐scale buildout around traffic and Smart City communications—the first such deployment to support Smart City in the U.S. on this scale.  In  addition  to  our  technical  due  diligence  and  project  engineering,  we  facilitated discussions with  the city’s  range of stakeholders about  their  fiber and broadband needs, and coordinated with the private sector companies that are building or already operating networks in the City.  

We have also developed RFIs and RFPs to serve a range of interrelated needs to further the City’s partner identification efforts. For example, we wrote an RFI to seek P3 opportunities and funding for Smart City infrastructure. And we wrote a second RFI to solicit interest and input for a P3 to build  out  wireless  networks  that  would  deliver  free  public  Wi‐Fi  and  support  Smart  City communications  within  the  downtown  and  major  park  areas,  and  in  the  Mayor’s  designed corridors. We also developed an RFP for City fiber construction on the routes where the City is not obtaining fiber from private partners.  

Page 40 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

15  

 

City of Bloomington, Indiana 

CTC  is  supporting  the  City’s  efforts  to  develop  ubiquitous, Gigabit‐class  broadband.  We  collaborated  with  City  staff  and other stakeholders to facilitate a public symposium and related communications  materials  on  the  value  of  next‐generation infrastructure.  We  performed  in‐depth  analysis  of  the  local broadband market,  and  fostered  engagement with  a  range  of public  and  private  stakeholders.  CTC’s  analysts  and  engineers also assessed the City’s existing assets, prepared a competitive assessment  of  broadband  services,  benchmarked  the  City’s  broadband  availability,  and developed  high‐level  engineering  and  cost  estimates.  Additionally,  our  team  developed  and administered an RFI  to gauge public‐sector  interest  in partnering with  the City  to achieve  its broadband goals. 

City of Boston  

CTC principals Joanne Hovis and Andrew Afflerbach are assisting the City with strategic guidance  in confidential negotiations with potential broadband service providers.  

In a parallel engagement, CTC engineers and analysts are evaluating  and  providing  recommendations  related  to the City’s  range of strategic options  for deploying  fiber optics  to  connect  its  public  schools  and  government facilities.  

As part of our  feasibility  study, CTC’s business analysts and engineers reviewed the engineering that the City had already completed; evaluated the stakeholders’ previously  identified needs and concerns; and analyzed both the City’s existing infrastructure assets and the general scope of the fiber network envisioned by the City.  

We are now exploring a wide  range of public and public–private options  for maximizing  the benefits  of  the  City’s  planned  investment  to  get  direct  fiber  connectivity  to  schools  and government buildings. 

We developed an RFI for the City to  identify the fiber providers and potential providers  in the public rights‐of‐way (PROW). We have led extensive discussions with middle mile and fiber‐to‐the‐tower (FTTT) carriers about their potential roles in working with the City.  

Page 41 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

16  

 

As one outcome of our work, we determined that the  fiber construction costs  in  the City are sufficiently high that the City should use existing infrastructure as much as possible. Accordingly, CTC engineers reviewed  fiber that had been  installed through  the City’s  longstanding shadow 

conduit  policy,  which  obligated  infrastructure  companies  to  provide  the  City  with  fiber  and conduit under  their  franchise  and PROW  agreements. We  are preparing  an RFP  to  establish partnerships that will enable the City to maximize use of existing construction and obtain dark fiber to schools and government buildings.  

Garrett County, Maryland We helped the County with engineering, strategy, and business planning  for expansion of middle‐mile  fiber—then helped  the County negotiate with a private partner to leverage that fiber to support the deployment of a fixed‐wireless broadband network. The TV White Spaces network will serve up to 3,000 currently unserved homes in the most remote parts of the County. 

Town of Holly Springs, North Carolina 

CTC conducted a broadband needs assessment and developed a strategic approach and return on  investment  (ROI)  analysis  for  the  town’s  proposed  fiber network implementation. Our team of project managers, outside plant  engineers,  and  network  engineers  then  designed  and oversaw implementation of a middle‐mile fiber network serving the  town’s  community  anchor  institutions  (e.g.,  schools  and libraries) and major economic development partners. The  first sites on the 19‐mile network went live in June 2014.  

As  in  our  engagement  with  the  City  of  Westminster,  we  also assisted  the  town  in  identifying  a  private  partner  to  assume operating risk in providing services to the public. Ting Internet will build an FTTP network using the town’s backbone infrastructure; the town announced its public–private partnership in 2015. For more details, see CTC’s website: http://www.ctcnet.us/blog/ctc‐helps‐position‐holly‐springs‐nc‐to‐attract‐big‐private‐fiber‐investment‐through‐smart‐infrastructure‐planning‐and‐best‐business‐practices/ 

Page 42 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

17  

 

City of Huntsville, Alabama 

CTC conducted broadband feasibility planning for the City and identified a range of options for models and approaches. We wrote the RFI through which the City launched its efforts to identify  a  private  partner  for  citywide  FTTP deployment.  That  process  ultimately  led  to the  City’s  negotiations  and  agreement  with Google Fiber—a partnership that follows the Westminster model. Huntsville Utilities will leverage its poles and infrastructure to construct its own FTTP citywide network with Google Fiber acting as anchor tenant on the network. For more details, see CTC’s website: http://goo.gl/i2jtZS. 

City of Lexington, Kentucky 

CTC prepared a high‐level fiber‐to‐the‐premises (FTTP) network design and cost estimate for the Lexington‐Fayette  Urban  County  Government  in  Kentucky.  CTC  currently  is  helping  the  City negotiate a potential broadband public–private partnership.  

City of Madison, Wisconsin  

CTC wrote a fiber‐to‐the‐premises (FTTP) feasibility study for the City in mid‐2016.7 Over the course of the engagement, CTC engineers and analysts inventoried the City’s key physical infrastructure, including the Metropolitan  Unified  Fiber  Network  (MUFN);  conducted  interviews with representatives of City departments and stakeholders; researched the  region’s  available  broadband  services  and  costs;  evaluated potential  public–private  partnership  business  models;  and  developed  pro  forma  financial statements for a City‐owned fiber network. In addition to those tasks, CTC conducted residential market research to supplement the report’s findings, and to help gauge the community’s interest in broadband.  

City of Ocala, Florida 

CTC led a feasibility study of the City of Ocala’s fiber‐optic enterprise. We explored the potential range of business models and services that the city could implement to leverage its existing fiber‐optic network and staff skill sets. We performed a competitive assessment of existing private sector broadband services and conducted market research with statistically significant surveys of the local commercial and residential sectors to assess current and future demand for high‐speed 

                                                       7 http://www.ctcnet.us/news/city‐of‐madison‐releases‐ctc‐report/  

Page 43 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

18  

 

connectivity. We then proposed  logical expansion strategies derived from  in‐depth analysis of financial costs, business models, and potential benefits to the community of multiple options.  

City of Palo Alto, California 

CTC has a multi‐decade  relationship with the City of Palo Alto and Palo Alto Utilities. In  two  parallel  projects  in  2015,  for example, CTC  developed  both  a  fiber‐to‐the‐premises (FTTP) master plan and a wireless network plan for the City. In the fiber realm, CTC determined the extent to which the City’s infrastructure could be used to enable FTTP buildout. We developed a  full FTTP  feasibility study  for a range of potential business models,  including public, private, and P3. In the wireless engagement, CTC conducted a system‐level requirements analysis and a needs assessment, and recommended wireless technologies, network designs, and business models.  

CTC previously provided strategic guidance and advice  to  the City on expanding  its dark  fiber network to create opportunities for enhanced utility, municipal, and commercial services. We assessed how  to  leverage existing  infrastructure  to promote  commercial wireless broadband deployment and improve municipal Smart Grid and public safety technologies. We also prepared a  framework  for establishing a public‐private partnership  to encourage greater  infrastructure deployment. 

CTC engineers are also currently developing a “dig once” ordinance and related processes for the City. 

City of Pharr, Texas 

CTC  has  collaborated  with  the  City  since  2016—developing  a  broadband  strategic  plan  that includes business planning and engineering guidance. Following a workshop with the City and its key stakeholders to establish a strategic direction, CTC’s engineers and analysts have assessed the  City’s  broadband  infrastructure  and  market;  evaluated  current  and  future  demand  for broadband; analyzed potential federal and regional funding mechanisms for fiber deployment; 

Page 44 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

19  

 

and explored options for the City to engage with the private sector on a potential partnership to expand the City’s broadband infrastructure. 

City and County of San Francisco 

CTC kicked off a major broadband strategic planning project with the City  in February 2017. We are providing strategic, financial, and technical advisory services as part of a broad effort to analyze the City’s broadband options.  

CTC  also  recently  developed  technical  specifications  for  a municipal  “dig  once”  policy  to  facilitate  the  cost‐effective expansion of broadband infrastructure throughout the City. 

We previously prepared a series of path‐breaking analyses of the feasibility of the City building and operating a fiber‐to‐the‐premises (FTTP) network—including a system design and detailed analysis of  candidate architectures and open access models. The project  also  included  analysis  of  multiple  business  models  and  business  recommendations customized for San Francisco’s unique circumstances.  

In another  strategic  initiative, CTC assisted  the City  in developing and evaluating options  for backhaul to serve City‐operated Wi‐Fi service to the public and to residents of public housing. 

CTC also provided ongoing consulting and strategic guidance with respect to an FTTP pilot and related technology projects, and helped the City with business planning, financial analysis, and engineering  design  to  support  its  preparation  of  an  extensive  application  for  federal  grant funding.  

City of Santa Cruz, California 

CTC  supported  the  development  of  the  City’s  broadband  public–private  partnership  with systems‐level  engineering,  cost  estimation,  market  data  analysis,  financial  modeling,  and business model development. For more details on our engagement and  the City’s plans, see: https://goo.gl/zPEIde  

City of Seattle and Seattle City Light 

As consultant to Seattle City Light and the City  itself,  CTC  has  delivered  business, technical,  and  strategic  guidance  and explored  options  for  FTTP  network deployment in light of its changing local marketplace and the emergence of new business models. 

Page 45 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

20  

 

In our current engagement, CTC  is developing a strategic plan  that will  recommend  technical approaches  to  filling broadband gaps  (e.g.,  in underserved neighborhoods) and a  sustainable business model for deployment. CTC is engaging various stakeholders and agencies on the City’s behalf, and conducting outreach to private sector entities—including internet service providers and wireless carriers—through an RFI process. CTC’s engineers and analysts will evaluate  the potential for P3s, examine the feasibility of using the City’s fiber to support Wi‐Fi, and provide a high‐level financial and technical approach to fill the City’s broadband gaps. 

This engagement follows on multiple significant projects we have completed with the City and its electric utility over more than eight years. In 2015, we completed a major FTTP feasibility study (http://www.seattle.gov/tech/initiatives/broadband/studies‐and‐history)  that  included residential and business market research, financial projections for multiple buildout approaches, and a risk assessment.  

CTC has previously performed market research and developed a feasibility study, a business case analysis, and an “off‐the‐balance‐sheet” benefits analysis for a proposed citywide FTTP network.  

The first study, “FTTP Municipal Broadband Risks and Benefits Evaluation,” included an internal needs analysis, market research of both residential and business customers; an assessment of competing services and technologies; and an evaluation of the business case and business risks.  

Following  on  that  report,  CTC  researched  and  wrote  an  “FTTP  Benefits  Evaluation,”  which explored the benefits of FTTP beyond the traditional balance sheet,  including cost avoidance, monetary savings, and environmental impact. Notably, this report was one of the first of its kind to  qualify  and  quantify  (where  possible)  community‐wide  benefits  of  ubiquitous  broadband connectivity such as enabling increased telecommuting, reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, and positive impacts on vulnerable populations such as the elderly and low‐income residents. 

In  the  third  phase  of  the  project,  CTC  advised  the  Mayor  of  Seattle  regarding  the  U.S. communications market and business planning strategies for a citywide fiber enterprise. CTC led and  facilitated a business planning working group comprised of  the Mayor’s  senior  staff,  the directors of the City’s electric and water/sewer utilities, and the City’s Chief Technology Officer. 

Cities of Urbana and Champaign / University of Illinois (UC2B Network) 

CTC has been  the  strategic and business planning consultant  to Urbana,  Champaign,  and  the  university  for  more  than  seven years—since the coalition conceived of constructing a middle‐mile fiber network to connect community anchor institutions.  

Page 46 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

21  

 

Following construction of the middle‐mile fiber, we prepared a request for information (RFI) to enable the cities and the university to identify a private partner that would finance and operate an  FTTP  expansion  of  the  network  to  serve  100  percent  of  the  community.  We  evaluated potential  partners’  proposals,  then  helped  to  negotiate  with  two  partners  to  reduce  the community’s risks and ensure that a partnership would achieve the coalition’s policy goals for digital inclusion. 

As a result of the coalition’s final partnership, UC2B secured an open access Gigabit FTTP network buildout that, based on  the negotiated agreement, would protect  its public policy  interest by providing the same opportunity for access to the entire community. In return, UC2B’s partner—the  ISP  and  network  operator  iTV3—would  have  access  to  UC2B’s  existing  middle‐mile infrastructure (which iTV3 would operate) and the foundation of a significant last‐mile consumer network. 

City of Westminster, Maryland 

The  Westminster  model  that  CTC  pioneered  is  the  most influential broadband P3 in establishing the model of city‐owned fiber and private use of that fiber. This demand‐driven model was the  first  of  its  kind.  (For  more  details,  see  CTC’s  website: http://goo.gl/h14Lqi.) 

The  construction  of  the  City’s  FTTP  network  and  its  groundbreaking  partnership  are  the culmination of a multi‐year engagement with CTC. CTC first prepared an FTTP feasibility study, cost estimate, and business case for the City  in 2012 and 2013. Our report, which focused on maximizing  available  backbone  network  connectivity,  included  a  technical  design  and  cost estimates  for  two  last‐mile  FTTP  pilot  projects  (one  focused  on  residential  customers,  one focused on businesses).  

Based  on  the  strength  of  the  City’s  commitment  to  its  principles,  and  the  outcome  of  the feasibility analysis, the City decided to move forward with the small‐scale pilot projects. As that focused construction began, CTC continued to work closely with the City to establish its principles and risk tolerance, then designed a potential P3 model that would achieve a balance between those  guiding  forces.  We  established  the  City’s  preferred  role  in  each  aspect  of  network construction  and  operations,  developed  criteria  for  evaluating  potential  partnerships,  and develop a financial analysis tool to model a range of assumptions. 

Based on  these parameters, we  then wrote  an RFP  to  identify  a private partner  that would assume operating risk in providing services to the public over the City’s FTTP infrastructure. The RFP led to successful negotiations, led by CTC President Joanne Hovis, and the announcement of a first‐of‐a‐kind partnership with Ting Internet. 

Page 47 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

22  

 

CTC  continues  to  support  the 80‐mile FTTP deployment over a  range of  tasks  spanning  fiber infrastructure engineering, network design,  construction bidding,  construction oversight,  and quality assurance inspection. 

Page 48 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

23  

 

7. ReferencesWe invite you to contact the following references about the quality, independence, and rigor of CTC’s work. Many additional references are available on request. 

 Town of Holly Springs, NC Mr. Jeff Wilson  IT Director  (919) 567‐4013, [email protected]   City of Sturgis, MI Mr. John Griffith Superintendent Electric Department (269) 659‐7218, [email protected]   Garrett County, Maryland Ms. Cheryl DeBerry Natural Resources Business Specialist Economic Development Department (301) 334‐6968, [email protected]   City of Boulder, CO Mr. Chris Meschuk Assistant City Manager (303) 441‐4293, [email protected]  

Page 49 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

24  

 

AppendixA:CTCStaffResumesJoanneS.Hovis,Esq.|PresidentandDirectorofBusinessConsulting

 Joanne  Hovis  is  an  attorney  and  business  planner  with  a  two‐decade  background  in communications  and  broadband.  She  is  a  nationally  recognized  authority  on  the  broadband market  and  on  the  evolving  role  of  public–private  partnerships  in  the  provision  of communications services to the public. 

Ms. Hovis leads the CTC team that advises the states of Connecticut, Kentucky, New Mexico, and New York; the cities of Atlanta, Boston, San Francisco, Seattle, and Washington, D.C.; and the statewide broadband networks in Colorado, Maryland, and Pennsylvania.  

Ms.  Hovis  oversees  all  ongoing  CTC  research  and  analysis  for  local  government  clients  and provides  innovative business planning  for  communications networking  initiatives  such as San Francisco’s planned fiber network and the interoperable public safety communications network in  the  National  Capital  Region.  She  also  leads  CTC’s  consulting  on  the  federal  E‐Rate  and Healthcare Connect Fund programs. 

Ms. Hovis is CEO of the Coalition for Local Internet Choice (CLIC) and a former president of the National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors (NATOA). She is a member of the boards of directors of the Benton Foundation and the Fiber Broadband Association.  

Business Planning and Feasibility Analysis Ms. Hovis leads all of CTC’s business planning efforts. She has spearheaded projects that explore a range of business models by which government clients can  leverage  their existing assets  to build, expand, and  incentivize broadband expansion. She  is sought nationwide as an expert  in municipal ownership and operational broadband business models, fiber and wireless markets, and public–private partnerships. Among the projects she has led are:  

City of Seattle. Ms. Hovis advised the Mayor of Seattle regarding the U.S. communications market and business planning strategies for a citywide enterprise. She reported the public subsidies a network would require, and delivered a full assessment of opportunities and risks. The report included internal needs analysis, statistically significant market research, an assessment of competing services and technologies, and an evaluation of the business case and financial risks. Ms. Hovis led further analysis of the benefits of FTTP beyond the traditional balance sheet, including cost avoidance, monetary savings, and environmental impact.  She  led  and  facilitated  a  business  planning  working  group  comprised  of  the Mayor’s senior staff, the directors of the city’s two utilities (electric and water/sewer), and the city’s CIO. 

Ms. Hovis advises the State of New Mexico’s Department of Information Technology on broadband planning. She led a team of writers and analysts that produced a guidebook for New Mexico’s local governments to guide them through the business, financial, and strategic planning necessary to  implement city‐ or county‐owned broadband networks. The  book‐length  guidebook  offers  specific  instructions  for  localities  to  research  and 

Page 50 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

25  

 

document  the  telecommunications  infrastructure  in  their  communities,  and discusses strategies for exploring public–private partnerships for broadband expansion.  

Ms. Hovis is working with the State of Kansas Department of Commerce on a large‐scale needs assessment of the state’s network infrastructure. She is conducting major market surveys among three core sectors across the state (residents, businesses, and community anchor institutions) to evaluate the current uses and needs of broadband infrastructure. She is also developing a strategy for the evolution of Kan‐ed, the state‐created broadband program that serves schools, hospitals, libraries, and higher education institutions. 

Ms. Hovis has advised officials  in  the District of Columbia government on a  range of telecommunications and fiber‐optic projects for almost a decade. She worked with the Office of the Chief Technology Officer (OCTO) to create a business plan and strategy for building a municipal fiber‐optic network with a wireless overlay in the least‐served wards of the city. She performed a business case and technology analysis (including five‐year projections)  for DC‐Net, a  fiber‐optic  telecommunications network  that provides voice and data services for the District of Columbia. She analyzed governmental, educational, and public  safety uses of  the network. The project  tasks  included asset mapping and network  description;  developing  a  cost  comparison  to  leased/managed  services; identifying opportunities to resell to other entities; identifying support mechanisms; and determining recommended business practices. She performs an ongoing role as strategic fiber adviser to the Chief Technology Officer and the Director of DC‐Net, and supports planning for the network’s future—including expanding the network to a broader array of end users. 

Ms. Hovis advises the Urbana‐Champaign Big Broadband (UC2B) Coalition (University of Illinois  and  the  cities  of  Champaign  and  Urbana)  on  a  wide  range  of  business  and strategic planning issues. She is currently evaluating the private sector bids to build out last‐mile  fiber  connections  in  the  cities.  She  took  a  leading  role  in  preparing  UC2B’s successful application for a federal Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) stimulus grant to support its proposed FTTP network.  

Ms.  Hovis  provided  extensive  business  planning,  market  assessment,  and  strategic planning for the City and County of San Francisco. Ms. Hovis served as a key adviser to the  city’s Chief  Information Officer.  She  conducted  an  independent evaluation of  the feasibility of San Francisco constructing and operating a municipal FTTP network to serve businesses and residences. As a first step toward the FTTP network, she worked with the City  to  plan  a  migration  of  the  leased  telecommunications  services  connecting  250 government facilities to a City middle‐mile fiber‐optic network; she also supported the city’s application for BTOP funding. She reviewed cost and pricing factors associated with using  leased  telecommunications services and circuits provided by private vendors, as compared with migration to government‐owned fiber optics. She projected the return on investment and total cost of ownership (including a wide range of costs from deployment to  staffing  to maintenance  to  financing  to cutover expenses). She evaluated potential efficiencies to be realized through in‐house rather than outsourced provision of services and circuits.  

Ms. Hovis led a feasibility study of the City of Ocala, Florida’s fiber‐optic enterprise. She 

Page 51 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

26  

 

explored  the  potential  range  of  business  models  and  services  that  the  city  could implement to leverage its existing fiber‐optic network and staff skill sets. She performed a competitive assessment of existing private sector broadband services and conducted market  research  with  statistically  significant  surveys  of  the  local  commercial  and residential sectors to assess current and future demand for high‐speed connectivity. She proposed  logical expansion strategies derived from  in‐depth analysis of financial costs, business models, and potential benefits to the community of multiple options.  

Ms. Hovis performed an expert assessment of the business and marketing plan for Utah’s inter‐jurisdictional network, UTOPIA. She  led a strategy session with key stakeholders, collected  relevant  background  material,  performed  an  analysis  of  UTOPIA  market research and marketing models, and independently evaluated UTOPIA’s business plan. At the  direction  of UTOPIA  leadership,  her work  focused  on  improving  the  participating UTOPIA communities’ ongoing cash flow. 

Ms. Hovis devised a business strategy and wrote a business plan for KINBER, the BTOP‐funded statewide backbone and middle‐mile fiber  infrastructure focused on the higher education and healthcare sectors in Pennsylvania. One highlight of the KINBER strategy was developing an actionable plan to increase early cash flow.  

Ms. Hovis developed a broadband feasibility study for Garrett County, Maryland with a specific focus on maximizing the benefits and use of the fiber backbone being built by the BTOP‐funded One Maryland Broadband Network (OMBN) project.  

 Grant Planning & Management Ms. Hovis’  expertise  includes  the many  funding  opportunities  available  to  local  government broadband planners through the federal government and other sources. She has guided clients through the grant process, from application writing to fund management.  Ms. Hovis’ grant work has included:  

Supporting more than a dozen clients in securing American Recovery and Reinvestment Act  (ARRA)  funds  through  the  Broadband  Technology Opportunities  Program  (BTOP). Successful  applicants  included  including  the  $22.5  million  Urbana‐Champaign  Big Broadband (UC2B) project, the $115 million One Maryland Broadband Network (OMBN), the $32.1 million OpenCape project  in Cape Cod, and Washington, D.C.’s $17.5 million Community Access Network (DC‐CAN). 

Securing additional National Telecommunications &  Information Administration  (NTIA) funds  from  the Public  Safety  Interoperable Communications  (PSIC) grant program on behalf of public health and public safety communications projects in the National Capital Region  (NCR),  encompassing  Washington,  D.C.  and  almost  two‐dozen  surrounding jurisdictions. 

Developing a successful application to the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC)—a partnership among federal, state, and local government—for Garrett County, Maryland.  

Providing  business  case  development  and  ongoing  business  planning  support  to significant Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) grant‐funded projects in the NCR. 

Advising  a  number  of  clients  on  Rural Utilities  Service  (RUS)  grant  applications,  and 

Page 52 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

27  

 

reviewing business plans and projections that make use of RUS  loan  funds  for entities such as UTOPIA, the regional non‐profit open access fiber network in suburban and rural Utah. 

 Speaking and Advocacy Ms. Hovis is in wide demand as a speaker and expert source on broadband deployment issues. She has testified before the U.S. Congress on matters of broadband deployment and policy; has been  interviewed  by  publications  including  Business  Week,  the  Washington  Post,  and  the Baltimore Sun; and has been featured on the C‐SPAN show “The Communicators.”   She has provided expert presentations  to  the Federal Communications Commission, National League of Cities,  Technology Policy  Summit,  the University of  Illinois, Case Western Reserve University, the New America Foundation, and the Congressional Internet Caucus.   Ms. Hovis recently authored “Gigabit Communities: Technical Strategies for Facilitating Public or Private  Broadband  Construction  in  Your  Community”—an  independent  report  sponsored  by Google and intended as a guide for local government leaders and planners.   EDUCATION Juris Doctor, with honors, University of Chicago Law School, 1994   Patino Fellow, awarded for academic achievement and community service, 1991–94 

 Bachelor of Arts, with distinction, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1990   PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS/LICENSES Member of Illinois Bar Association, Member of District of Columbia Bar Association  ORGANIZATIONS 

Coalition for Local Internet Choice, CEO  Benton Foundation, Director  Fiber Broadband Association, Director  United States Unified Community Anchor Network, Task Force on Community Anchor 

Network Economic Models, Charter Member  National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors, Past President  

 PRIOR TO COMING TO CTC IN 1997 1996–1997  Litigation/Communications Attorney, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky, & Popeo 

P.C., Washington, D.C. 1994–1996  Litigation Attorney, Jenner & Block, Chicago

Page 53 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

28  

 

AndrewAfflerbach,Ph.D.,P.E.|CEOandChiefTechnologyOfficer 

Dr. Andrew Afflerbach specializes  in planning, design, and  implementation of communications infrastructure and networks. His expertise includes emerging fiber and wireless technologies and state‐of‐the‐art networking applications.  

As Chief Technology Officer, he oversees all engineering work performed by CTC Technology & Energy. He is a licensed Professional Engineer in the Commonwealth of Virginia and the states of Delaware, Maryland, and Illinois. 

Dr. Afflerbach has planned and overseen implementation of a wide variety of government and public safety networks, including the infrastructure of state and metropolitan area governments. He  prepared  extensive  technical  analyses  for  submission  to  the  Federal  Communications Commission  (FCC)  and policymakers on national  fiber expansion  to underserved  schools  and libraries, on due diligence for the IP transition of the telecommunications infrastructure, and on potential  technical  frameworks  for wireless network neutrality. He  also  recently  served  as  a senior adviser to Crown Fibre Holdings, the public entity that is directing New Zealand’s national fiber‐to‐the‐home project. 

Broadband Planning and Engineering 

Dr. Afflerbach has architected, designed, and overseen implementation of numerous broadband networks  for  local and  state governments,  including  those of Washington, D.C.; Crown  Fibre Holdings  (Government of New Zealand); San Francisco;  the Commonwealth of Kentucky;  the Delaware Department of Transportation; the Maryland Transportation Authority; St. Louis Park, Minnesota; and many large counties.  

Advisory Services  

Dr. Afflerbach advises a wide range of policy think tanks, U.S. federal agencies, and non‐profits regarding the engineering issues underlying key communications issues. For example, he:  

Leads  the  technical  team  conducting  FirstNet  planning  for  the  District  of  Columbia (Washington, D.C.). 

Serves  as  key  technical  adviser  to  the  Commonwealth  of  Kentucky  as  it  deploys  it statewide Next Generation Kentucky Information Network. 

Provided expert testimony to the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the matter of  the preparation of  the  national broadband plan  as  a  representative of  the National  Association  of  Counties  (NACo)  and  the  National  Association  of Telecommunications Officers & Advisors (NATOA). 

Served  as  expert  adviser  regarding broadband deployment  to  the U.S. Conference of Mayors, NACo, National League of Cities, and NATOA in those organizations’ filings before the FCC  in the matter of determination of the deployment of a national,  interoperable wireless network in the 700 MHz spectrum. 

In connection with the FCC’s ongoing Open Internet proceeding, advised the New America 

Page 54 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

29  

 

Foundation regarding the technical pathways by which “any device” and “any application” regimes could be achieved  in  the wireless broadband arena as  they have been  in  the wireline area. 

Provided expert technical advice on the 700 MHz broadband and AWS‐3 proceedings at the FCC for the Public Interest Spectrum Coalition (including Free Press, the New America Foundation, Consumers Union, and the Media Access Project).  

Prepared technical reports and analysis regarding fiber construction for submittal to the FCC, in connection with preparation of the National Broadband Plan, by NATOA, the City and County of San Francisco, and the Schools, Health, and Libraries Coalition.  

Served as technical adviser to the Naval Exchange in its evaluation of vendors’ broadband communications services on U.S. Navy bases worldwide. 

Advised the U.S. Internal Revenue Service regarding the history of broadband and cable deployment  and  related  technical  issues  in  that  agency’s  evaluation  of  appropriate regulations for those industries. 

Advised, during the height of the broadband “open access” debate, a variety of public interest associations and communities,  including  the City of Los Angeles and Stanford University, regarding the technical means by which cable networks could be opened to competition.  

Advised the Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society on the technical issues for their briefs in the Brand X Supreme Court appeal regarding cable broadband.  

Provided technical advice to numerous non‐profits, associations, and agencies as diverse as  the  Center  for  Internet  and  Society  at  Stanford  Law  School;  the  Internal  Revenue Service, the Alliance for Community Media, the William Penn Foundation, the Center for Digital Democracy, and the FCC’s Local and State Government Advisory Board (LSGAC).  

Has been invited to speak about communications technologies before such organizations as the Public Technology Institute, American Association of Community Colleges, ICMA, ILCMA, and the Practicing Law Institute. 

Developed curricula for a variety of organizations, including the University of Maryland, the United States Department of Transportation, and the George Washington University.  

Has  taught  courses  and  delivered  seminars  regarding  communications  for  numerous educational and government institutions.  

Public Safety Network Interoperability and Interconnection 

Dr. Afflerbach served as lead engineer and technical architect for planning and development of NCRnet, a regional fiber‐optic and microwave network that  links public safety and emergency support users throughout the 19 jurisdictions of the National Capital Region (Washington, D.C. and surrounding jurisdictions), under a grant from the U.S. Department for Homeland Security’s Urban Areas Safety Initiative. He wrote the  initial feasibility studies that  led to this project for regional network interconnection.  

Smart Grid  

Dr. Afflerbach and the CTC team provided expert testimony and advisory services to the Public 

Page 55 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

30  

 

Service  Commission  of  Maryland  regarding  Advanced  Metering  Infrastructure  (AMI).  CTC provided objective guidance to the staff as it evaluated AMI applications submitted by three of the state’s investor‐owned utilities (IOUs). This contract represented the first time the PSC staff had asked a consultant to advise them on technology—a reflection of the lack of standards in the Smart Grid arena, and the magnitude of the investment that the utilities were proposing. 

Instruction/Expertise 

Dr. Afflerbach has  served  as  an  instructor  for  the U.S.  Federal Highway Association/National Highway  Institute,  the  George  Washington  University  Continuing  Education  Program,  the University of Maryland Instructional TV Program, ITS America, Law Seminars International, and the COMNET Exposition.  

He teaches and helped develop an online graduate‐level course for the University of Maryland. He developed and taught communications courses and curricula for ITS America, COMNET, and University  of  Maryland.  His  analysis  of  cable  open  access  is  used  in  the  curriculum  of  the International Training Program on Utility Regulation and Strategy at the University of Florida.  

Dr.  Afflerbach  has  also  prepared  client  tutorials  and  presented  papers  on  emerging telecommunications technology to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), NATOA, the National League of Cities (NLC), the International City/County Management Association (ICMA), and  the  American  Association  of  Community  Colleges  (AACC).  He  also  taught  college‐level astrophysics at the University of Wisconsin. 

EMPLOYMENT HISTORY 1995–Present  CEO/Chief Technology Officer, CTC 

Previously Director of Engineering, Principal Engineer, Senior Scientist 1990–1996  Astronomer/Instructor/Researcher    University of Wisconsin–Madison, NASA, and Swarthmore College  EDUCATION Ph.D., Astronomy, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1996  Master of Science, Astronomy, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1993 Bachelor of Arts, Physics, Swarthmore College, 1991  PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS/LICENSES Professional Engineer, Commonwealth of Virginia and states of Delaware, Maryland, and Illinois  HONORS/ORGANIZATIONS 

Association of Public‐Safety Communications Officials (APCO)  Board of Visitors, University of Wisconsin Department of Astronomy  National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors (NATOA) Technology 

and Public Safety Committees  Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association (AFCEA)  Society of Cable and Telecommunications Engineers (SCTE) 

Page 56 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

31  

 

Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE)   Charleston Defense Contractors Association (CDCA)  NASA Graduate Fellow, 1993–1996. Research fellowship in astrophysics  Elected Member, Sigma Xi Scientific Research Honor Society  Eugene M. Lang Scholar, 1987–1991, Swarthmore College 

 SELECTED PUBLICATIONS, PRESENTATIONS, and COURSES 

“Mobile Broadband Networks Can Manage Congestion While Abiding By Open Internet Principles,” prepared for the New America Foundation’s Open Technology Institute – Wireless Future Project, November 2014. 

“The State of the Art and Evolution of Cable Television and Broadband Technology,” prepared for Public Knowledge, November 2014. 

“A Model for Understanding the Cost to Connect Schools and Libraries with Fiber Optics,” prepared for the Schools, Health & Libraries Broadband Coalition, October 2014.  

“The Art of the Possible: An Overview of Public Broadband Options,” prepared jointly with the New America Foundation’s Open Technology Institute, May 2014. 

“Understanding Broadband Performance Factors,” with Tom Asp, Broadband Communities magazine, March/April 2014. 

“A Brief Assessment of Engineering Issues Related to Trial Testing for IP Transition,” prepared for Public Knowledge and sent to the FCC as part of its proceedings on Advancing Technology Transitions While Protecting Network Values, January 2014 

“Gigabit Communities: Technical Strategies for Facilitating Public or Private Broadband Construction in Your Community,” prepared as a guide for local government leaders and planners (sponsored by Google), January 2014 

“Critical Partners in Data Driven Science: Homeland Security and Public Safety,” submitted to the Workshop on Advanced Regional & State Networks (ARNs): Envisioning the Future as Critical Partners in Data‐Driven Science, Internet2 workshop chaired by Mark Johnson, CTO of MCNC, Washington, D.C., April 2013  

 “Connected Communities: How a City Can Plan and Implement Public Safety & Public Wireless,” submitted to the International Wireless Communications Exposition, Las Vegas, Nevada, March 2013  

“Cost Estimate for Building Fiber Optics to Key Anchor Institutions,” prepared for submittal to the FCC by the National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors and the Schools, Health, and Libraries Coalition, September 2009.  

“Efficiencies Available Through Simultaneous Construction and Co‐location of Communications Conduit and Fiber,” prepared for submittal to the FCC by the National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors and the City and County of San Francisco, 2009, referenced in the National Broadband Plan.  

“How the National Capital Region Built a 21st Century Regional Communications Network” and “Why City and County Communications are at Risk,” invited presentation at the FCC’s National Broadband Plan workshop, August 25, 2009. 

Page 57 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

32  

 

“Existing and Emerging Broadband Technologies,” NATOA Conference, October 2007.   “An Assessment of the Technical Capabilities of the AWS‐3 Spectrum,” expert report 

prepared for Free Press, December 2007.  “An Engineering Assessment of Select Technical Issues Raised in the 700 MHz 

Proceeding,” expert report prepared for FCC filing for Free Press and Media Access Project (Public Interest Spectrum Coalition), May 2007. 

“Understanding FiOS and U‐Verse Architecture,” presented at NATOA’s Policy and Legal Conference, Washington, D.C., spring 2007. 

“Fiber to the Premises and Fiber to the Node,” Journal of Municipal Telecommunications Policy, Fall 2006. 

“Communications Infrastructure Primer,” presented to the National Fire Protection Association, Miami Beach, FL, 2006. 

Supplemental Report, “Technological Analysis of Open Access and Cable Systems,” http://www.aclu.org/Privacy/Privacy.cfm?ID=17507, prepared for American Civil Liberties Union and Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society, 2005. 

Affordable Telecommunication Networks for Local Government, International City/County Management Association, November 2004. 

“Telecommunications and ITS: What You Need To Know,” prepared curriculum for two‐day training course for the University of Maryland, 2001. 

“Technological Analysis of Open Access and Cable Systems,” prepared for ACLU, 2001.  “No Pipes: Wireless Broadband,” Journal of Municipal Telecommunications Policy, 2001.  “Interactive PEG: Technical Strategy for Implementation,” Community Media Review, 

2000.  “Telecommunications and Intelligent Transportation Services,” two‐day training course, 

presented in multiple cities for the US Department of Transportation/ITS America, 1999.  “Building Integrated Voice, Data, and Video Networks for the Local and Wide Area,” 

two‐day training course, presented for the University of Maryland, 1999.  “Integrated Data, Video & Voice Broadband Networks,” week‐long training course, 

presented at the COMNET Exposition, Washington, DC, and January, 1999.  “LANs: Design and Installation of Networks that Support Voice, Data, and Video 

Applications,” multi‐day training course, presented for the George Washington University Continuing Engineering Education Program, 1996; 1997; 1998; 1999. 

Cable Network Technology: A Primer for Local Officials, International City/County Management Association, September 1998. 

“I‐Nets and the Internet,” Infotech Report, August 1998.  “Integrated Data, Video & Voice Broadband Networks” and “Design & Implementation 

of Metropolitan Area Networks (MANs),” presented at the 1998 COMNET Exposition.

Page 58 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

33  

 

ThomasJ.Asp,BSEE,MBA|PrincipalEngineerandAnalyst Mr. Asp specializes in evaluating connectivity (voice, video, and data) options and recommending effective  solutions  for  clients  throughout  the United States. He holds more  than 25 years of experience  as  an  engineer  and  analyst  in  communications  and  public  power  systems.  His experience  includes  electric  and  telecommunication  system  design,  network  feasibility, evaluation of the financial impact of projects on operations, and provision of expert testimony.   Mr.  Asp  is  recognized  as  an  expert  in  evaluating  and  offering  recommendations  regarding municipal  broadband  communications  systems.  He  has  been  actively  involved  with telecommunication market research and feasibility analysis for over a decade, both with CTC and previously as a partner at the public accounting firm of Virchow Krause (Baker Tilley). Mr. Asp also has significant experience in the communications industry working in the areas of cellular, cable TV, broadband, and mobile radio,  including as a product manager  in the Cellular Mobile Telephone, Automatic Meter Reading, and Distribution Automation industries.  Broadband Networks (Wired and Wireless) Mr. Asp  is regarded as one of the premiere analysts  in the United States regarding municipal planning  and  deployment  of  broadband  systems  to  meet  economic  development,  digital inclusion, and other needs. He has assisted numerous local governments, municipal utilities, and municipal consortia to evaluate their communities’ communications needs and determine the financial parameters and business case for meeting those needs.  In this area, Mr. Asp’s experience includes preparing connectivity feasibility studies for municipal networks, including economic analysis, market assessment, technology review, vendor analysis, and business plan development. He has assisted numerous  communities with evaluating  the feasibility of advanced connectivity services alternatives including provider partnerships and city‐owned  networks.  He  has  reviewed  options  under  cable  franchise  agreement  for  municipal purchase  and  operation.  Mr.  Asp  has  reviewed  offerings  and  operations  of  incumbent telecommunications providers and assisted in negotiations with incumbent telecommunications providers  to  enhance  availability  of  existing  services  and  to  encourage  new  and  innovative offerings.   Some select examples of his projects include: 

Provided Jackson (Tennessee) Energy Authority an independent evaluation of responses to JEA’s 2010 request for proposals (RFP) soliciting vendors to provide wholesale voice services. With JEA staff input, he developed the evaluation system and scoring matrix to ensure a balanced approach that best met JEA’s needs. Responses were evaluated on the basis  of  strategic  fit,  operational  fit,  reliability,  and  overall  cost;  recommended  two respondents as finalists for further consideration by JEA; and assisted JEA in negotiating with those finalists. As a final step in the process, CTC presented to JEA management a written report recommending the “best‐fit” vendor. 

Page 59 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

34  

 

Completed a business and  technology plan  for Los Angeles Department of Water and Power  (LADWP)  to  determine  the  feasibility  of  expanding  the  connectivity  services offered to the businesses and institutions over the Department’s fiber network. Included in the analysis was a valuation of additional fiber routes that LADWP acquired from the City of Los Angeles. 

Served as a business consultant to the City and County of San Francisco. Investigated the feasibility of  the city building and operating a  fiber‐to‐the‐premises  (FTTP) network  to every home and business  in San Francisco. The project  included an analysis of multiple business models and business recommendations customized for San Francisco’s unique circumstances.  

Developed a business case analysis for DC‐Net, a District‐owned and operated fiber optic telecommunications network that provides voice and data services. The network consists of  resilient,  interconnected  fiber optic  rings  that  connect more  than 400 government buildings in the District, including Police Department, Emergency Management Agency, and Fire Department radio towers.  

Conducted a  feasibility study, a business case analysis, and an “off‐the‐balance‐sheet” benefits analysis for a fiber‐optic network proposed by the mayor of the City of Seattle. The first study, FTTP Municipal Broadband Risks and Benefits Evaluation, sponsored by Seattle City Light, included the following elements:  

Internal needs analysis  Market research of both residential and business  Assessment of competing services and technologies  Evaluation of the business case and business risks  

Following on that report, Mr. Asp researched and wrote an FTTP Benefits Evaluation for the  City,  which  explored  the  benefits  of  FTTP  beyond  the  traditional  balance  sheet, including cost avoidance, monetary savings, and environmental impact. 

Performed  an  expert  assessment  of  a  business  and  marketing  plan  for  Utah Telecommunication Open Infrastructure Agencies (UTOPIA’s) open access FTTP network. The  project  included  a  strategy  session  with  key  stakeholders,  collection  of  relevant background material, an analysis of UTOPIA market research and marketing models, and an  independent  evaluation  of  UTOPIA’s  business  plan.  Mr.  Asp’s  work  focused  on improving  the  participating  UTOPIA  communities’  ongoing  cash  flow  and  increasing participation of households and businesses in those communities.  

Prepared a fiber optic business plan for Richland Utilities, Washington to meet the needs of city facilities, the electric utility, schools, hospitals, banks, and other institutions. Work included preparation of various business models,  review of operational  requirements, and preparation of pro‐forma financial statements. 

Provided extensive business planning assistance to the State of Maryland’s One Maryland program,  which  lead  to  build  an  interconnected  fiber‐optic  broadband  network  that reaches every county and city  in Maryland and will provide backbone and middle‐mile capacity for commercial carriers. 

Managed project assisting Bountiful City, UT with the development of a business plan for a  citywide wireless network. This project  included  the  review of a  conceptual design, 

Page 60 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

35  

 

reviewing proposed business  relationships and  staffing, and  conducting a  cost‐benefit analysis.  

Project  manager  in  assisting  Ames,  IA  with  the  review  of  existing  architecture, development of a network design, and preparation of detailed  cost estimates  for  the acquisition and installation of Wi‐Fi hot spots and supporting infrastructure. This project has now moved into implementation preparations.  

Led consulting team in investigating several Wi‐Fi deployment models, development of a business plan (including market research and financial analysis), and development of a partnership RFP for St. Louis Park, MN. Mr. Asp assisted the city to pilot the network and then  prepared  specifications  and  bid  documents  to  identify  both  integrators  and operators for the network. 

Assisted  the City of  Tucson, AZ with  a wireless  feasibility  study  that  included market research,  competitive  industry  assessment,  internal  and  external  needs  assessments, financial analysis, and the development of a business plan. 

Assistance  in the  implementation of an  Institutional Fiber Network  (I‐Net)  for Norwich Public Utilities  in Norwich, CT. Project  included development of a plan and strategy for the Fiber Optic Enterprise. 

 DA, AMR, SCADA In the areas of Distribution Automation (DA), Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA), mobile  radio,  and  Advanced  Metering  Infrastructure  (AMI),  Mr.  Asp  has  assisted  municipal utilities and public power cooperatives with extensive evaluative and design services. Specifically, he has prepared evaluations and submitted recommendations on AMI alternatives and benefits. He has  assessed  existing  and  evolving  technologies  and  services  to  support AMI  and DA  for electric utilities and has developed and directed demonstration plans  to  test  technologies  to support distribution automation ‐‐ including providing recommendations for establishing vendor alliances, performing research and designs networks to combine multi‐utility communications, and  outlining,  evaluating,  and  recommending  communication  requirements  and  options  for electric utility DA, SCADA, mobile radio, and AMI.  TESTIMONY & VALUATION In addition to assisting over 80 communities and counties in evaluating financial opportunities to provide voice, data, and video services, Mr. Asp has provided financial and technical testimony and expert advice. Some examples include:  

Conducted an exhaustive business case analysis and prepared expert witness testimony on behalf of the City of Alameda in a federal court case involving the business practices, business results, and ultimate sale of its fiber optic enterprise. The testimony included a comparative  analysis  of  business  models  employed  by  municipal  fiber  networks nationwide and a review and valuation of several recent cable business transactions. 

Maryland Public Service Commission regarding Baltimore Gas & Electric’s application for deployment of AMI and smart grid technologies. Written and sworn testimony included an analysis of smart grid technologies, vendor development, and impact to rates. 

Page 61 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

36  

 

Pacific  Gas  &  Electric  regarding  the  financial  and  technical  viability  of  the  use  of Broadband over Power line (BPL) for Automatic Meter Reading (AMR) and support of new business opportunities. Mr. Asp prepared a report in anticipation of being called to testify before the California PUC 

The  City  of  Lebanon,  OH  in  connection  with  a  dispute  over  an  Assessment  of Infrastructure  Connectivity  Fee  with  home‐builders  and  Time  Warner  Cable.  The Assessment and disposition regarded the reasonableness of the connection fee assessed to each new home by the municipal telecom department 

The City of Marshal, MO in determination of the value of the incumbent cable television system owned and operated by Time Warner. 

 EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Electrical Engineering, North Dakota State University, 1979 Master of Business Administration, University of St. Thomas, St. Paul, 1989   

 

Page 62 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

37  

 

MatthewDeHaven|PrincipalEngineerandProjectManager 

Matthew  DeHaven  specializes  in  wired  and  wireless  communications  and  broadband telecommunications technology for public safety and other  local government and  institutional needs. He has over 13 years of extensive engineering experience designing, developing, installing, and overseeing integration of local and wide area networks for institutional, public safety, and Intelligent  Transportation  System  (ITS)  applications,  video‐networking  solutions,  and  unified communications systems.  

Mr.  DeHaven  has  experience  at  many  levels  of  network  design,  procurement,  and implementation  for  high‐capacity  metropolitan‐area  networks  to  support  converged  video, voice, and data communications. He leads network designs and the preparation of specifications for competitive bid processes, serves as project manager overseeing implementation and testing for  a wide  range  of  government  clients. Mr. DeHaven  prepares  designs  and  cost models  to support decision‐makers in the deployment of a range of data network technologies, traditional telephone  systems,  voice‐over‐IP  (VoIP)  networks,  one‐way  video  distribution,  and  two‐way videoconferencing. His data network experience includes work with SONET, Ethernet, and ATM 

networks using a range of fiber optic, copper, and wireless technologies. He serves as CTC’s lead engineer on numerous wide area network projects. 

Among many other projects, he served as a one of the primary technical architects for the 19 jurisdiction  fiber optic/microwave network  currently deployed  in  the National Capital Region (NCRnet) to support public safety interoperable communications.  

Inter‐County Broadband Network 

Originally serving as part of the grant application development team that successfully  led the State  of  Maryland  to  a  $115  million  Broadband  Technology  Opportunities  Program  (BTOP) administered by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), Mr. DeHaven  served  as  the  Portfolio  Manager  for  the  One  Maryland  Inter‐County  Broadband Network BTOP grant project.  

The ICBN is a nine‐jurisdiction consortium in central Maryland led by Howard County, Maryland, and is a key sub‐recipient of the State’s grant award. Mr. DeHaven is the lead technical consultant overseeing the use of approximately $72 million in grant funds to build over 800 miles of fiber optics and directly connect approximately 650 community anchor institutions, including schools, libraries, government buildings, community colleges, and public safety agencies. Mr. DeHaven was  tasked  with  overseeing  numerous  engineering  and  construction  contractors,  as  well  as playing a key role in overall network design during this aggressive three‐year endeavor that began in late 2010.  

Page 63 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

38  

 

Wireless Communications 

Mr. DeHaven assesses clients’ existing and projected wireless broadband needs and recommends potential strategies for using new technologies to enhance and improve network operations and services. Some select examples of his ongoing and past projects include: 

Engineering support of the ongoing deployment of a citywide 4.9 GHz public safety radio mesh network for the City of Port Angeles, WA. CTC conducted a needs assessment of the city’s network and reviewed public safety mobile data communications considerations, which led to the development of network specifications and overseeing the procurement for the expansion of the city’s fiber network and a citywide wireless network serving both public safety and public access needs.  

Provided  an  updated  assessment  and  review  to  Cincinnati,  OH  of  the  city’s  current networks and recommended updates to the long‐term strategic plan originally prepared in 2004. This project  involves assessing and  identifying new department and network application needs, assessing  the  current networks  to meet  identified needs, assessing emerging  fiber  and  wireless  technologies,  recommending  wireless  strategies,  and providing recommendations and strategies for meeting foreseeable needs.  

Developed a strategic plan for a wireless data network to meet public safety and  local government  needs  in  Seattle,  WA.  CTC  previously  conducted  a  feasibility  study  that identified these needs. 

Design of a broadband wireless network for Annapolis, MD that provides connectivity for a citywide video surveillance system. The network was designed to provide high‐degrees of security and have substantial reserve capacity to support the addition of new video requirements,  expand  toll‐quality  IP‐based  voice  and  data  services,  and,  potentially, provide backhaul for a future mobile wireless solution. 

Oversight of the design and implementation of a “wireless downtown” for Skokie, IL to enhance economic development and Internet accessibility for residents and visitors. 

Project oversight in developing an infrastructure plan to support the implementation of Wi‐Fi  services  throughout  a  downtown  area  targeted  for  economic  development  in Rockville, MD. The plan focuses on deploying a flexible architecture of physical support infrastructure  to  enable  a  wide  range  of  wireless  connectivity  options  for  visitors, residents, and business tenants while maintaining the aesthetics of the development. 

Evaluation of bids  from wireless service providers who responded to the city of Mesa, AZ’s RFP. CTC also,  in an earlier phase of the project, provided an assessment of Wi‐Fi technology and potential expansion of  the  fiber‐optic  infrastructure via mass wireless communications—potentially for an intelligent transportation system application and for free Internet access for citizens. 

Research on current and future wireless technologies and evaluation of the feasibility of implementing a secure public safety wireless network  in Prince George’s County, MD. Designed and implemented a pilot project to test the feasibility of a public safety network. A  successful  solution  was  deployed  to  enable  Mobile  Data  Computers  in  emergency 

Page 64 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

39  

 

response  vehicles  to  securely  roam  from a  carrier CDMA network  to private, County‐operated Wi‐Fi hotspots. 

 

Public Safety Networking 

In  addition  to  supporting  the  design  and  deployment  of  NCRnet,  Mr.  DeHaven  is  the  lead engineer  responsible  for  one  of  the  key  applications  leveraging  this  regional  network.  Mr. DeHaven  is responsible  for  the design,  implementation, and ongoing operations of a regional videoconferencing network supporting Emergency Management among the 21  jurisdictions  in the National Capital Region  (DC, MD, VA). CTC developed  the  systems’ designs  and oversaw 

implementation under a grant from the Department of Homeland Security Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI). This network now serves thousands of end users, integrated tightly with the ever growing videoconferencing and VoIP systems leveraged by these jurisdictions. 

In Anne Arundel County, MD, Mr. DeHaven assisted with the deployment of traffic surveillance cameras. He provided analysis of candidate technical solutions for cameras using the County’s high‐speed  fiber‐optic  I‐Net  to  transport  video  and  control  signals,  developed  system 

specifications, and oversaw the implementation of the County’s video surveillance capabilities.  

Mr. DeHaven was also involved in the planning and implementation of a statewide network in Delaware  for  the  purpose  of  providing  traffic  information  and  traffic  control  capabilities  to transportation management  facilities.  Such  a network  allows  remote  control of  traffic  signal systems and variable message displays, while providing real‐time traffic surveillance in the form 

of video images and microwave sensor data. He has developed expertise in the numerous forms of technology used  in this type of project, ranging from fiber optics to wireless digital spread‐spectrum communications.  

Mr.  DeHaven  serves  as  CTC’s  lead  engineer  with  respect  to  the  Delaware  Department  of Transportation’s Advanced Traffic Advisory Radio System, the first Advanced TARS system in the country. In that capacity, he is responsible for training and advising on‐site staff, specifying and installing new equipment, and monitoring performance of the system. 

Video and Broadcast Communications Engineering 

Mr. DeHaven’s experience includes the management, design, and procurement of video, voice, and data networks. Some select examples of his recent project work include: 

Analysis of the technical options to allow The Rockville Channel (Rockville, MD) to support live  cablecasting  from multiple  facilities,  including  the  implementation of  an  IP‐based video  and  audio  transmission  system. He  also managed  the  relocation  of  the master 

Page 65 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

40  

 

control  and  studio  production  systems  for  The  Rockville  Channel.  CTC  successfully executed the relocation during the tight window of opportunity between live production events,  while  making  enhancements  to  system  layout  and  cabling  infrastructure  and keeping the channel “on‐air” during the process. 

Development and  implementation of videoconferencing and teleconferencing tools for the 21  jurisdictions  in the National Capital Region (DC, MD, VA) Emergency Operations Centers  (EOCs) and Emergency Communications Centers  (ECCs) over a state‐of‐the‐art fiber‐optic and microwave network.  

Preparation of system‐level design recommendations and cost estimates for an extensive, countywide system to support interactive and on‐demand video training communications for the Anne Arundel (MD) County Fire Department. CTC also developed the design for a video display system for the Fire Department’s new dispatch center,  intended to allow key sources of information to be prominently displayed throughout the facility.  

Preparation of system‐level design recommendations and cost estimates for an extensive, citywide  system  to  support  interactive  and  on‐demand  video  communications  for training,  emergency  collaboration,  and  routine  meetings  between  Mesa,  AZ  Fire Department  personnel.  CTC  also  integrated  a  pilot  videoconferencing  system  to demonstrate certain capabilities of the system design. 

Development of a videoconferencing system for homeland security applications on behalf of Arlington County, VA—the site of the September 11, 2001 Pentagon attack. The system links  numerous  public  safety  and  other  government  users  and  aims  to  ensure uninterrupted emergency communications  in the event of a terrorist attack or natural disaster. 

 

Instruction/Expertise 

Mr.  DeHaven  led  the  CTC  research  team  in  preparing  Web‐based  Intelligent  Transportation System  (ITS)‐Communications  courses  on  behalf  of  the  University  of  Maryland  Center  for Advanced Transportation Technology. He has served as an online instructor for these courses for more than six years.  

EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Electrical Engineering, in progress, The Johns Hopkins University   SAMPLE PUBLICATIONS/COURSES 

“What’s  the  Fuss  About  Fiber?  A  Comparative  Analysis  of  Fiber  and  Copper  Physical Media,” Journal of Municipal Telecommunications Policy, Spring 2009.  

“Deploying Public Safety Networks: Costs and Benefits – 4.9 GHz for Video Surveillance,” presented at annual SEATOA Conference, April 2008. 

“Busting the Technology Myths,” presented at NATOA Conference, October 2007.  “Wi‐Fi and Beyond: Taming Technology for your Community,” presented at the annual 

TATOA Conference, August 2007.   

Page 66 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

41  

 

EricWirth|SeniorProjectEngineer 

Eric Wirth  has  almost  15  years  of  communications  engineering  experience;  he  specializes  in evaluating broadband (video, voice, and data) telecommunications networks, analyzing emerging broadband technologies, and designing broadband networks for institutional uses. In addition, Mr. Wirth is conducting extensive and ongoing research on applications for Internet Protocol (IP) technology, including video‐over‐IP (VoIP) for video transmission over wide area networks, video conferencing, and other communication applications for wide area networks.  

Utility and Public Safety Fiber Optic Networking 

Mr. Wirth’s  experience  includes  the  design  and  implementation  of  a  variety  of  fiber  optic communications network. Some select examples of his work include: 

Design and pricing of fiber optic cable, electronics, and overall architecture of a survivable emergency  communications  system  for  Tennessee  Valley  Public  Power  Association (TVPPA) distributors. The design  included MPLS and DWDM technology, and  leveraged TVPPA and distributor fiber. 

Design and  implementation of a  fiber optic network  for Norwich  (Connecticut) Public Utilities. The project consisted of developing detailed fiber optic route design and cost estimates,  network  electronic  design  and  cost  estimates  (including  SCADA transportation),  and  a  request  for  proposals  (RFP)  for  Norwich’s  use  in  selecting  a contractor to complete the installation. In addition to serving the utility’s needs, the fiber optic network was designed to serve city, schools, and hospital users. 

Fiber optic network and electronics design, and RFP development, for the City of Dover, Delaware  Electric  Department.  Mr.  Wirth  developed  a  fiber  optic  network  design  to provide additional redundancy and functionality for the existing city fiber optic network. In addition, he developed a network electronics design to  leverage the new fiber optic communications links to increase the reliability of the city’s network. 

Fiber optic network design and feasibility analysis for the City of Palo Alto, California. The City is examining several fiber optic construction projects to expand its existing fiber optic network to further meet the needs of the city and surrounding school districts, and to increase the footprint of its commercial fiber optic network. As a municipal electric, Palo Alto is exploring several options for fiber optic design. 

 

Wireless Communications 

Mr. Wirth has extensive experience working on numerous wireless networking projects,  from 

analysis and feasibility to design and implementation. These networks range in scope from small hot  spots  to area‐wide and  regional networks. Some  representative examples of his projects include: 

Page 67 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

42  

 

Designing and overseeing the implementation of a citywide broadband wireless network project that will provide integrated communications and interoperability among all local public safety entities in the City of Port Angeles, Washington. The high‐capacity 4.9 GHz broadband wireless network provides public safety staff in the field with full and timely access  to  state,  federal,  and GIS databases,  and will  allow  EMS  responders  to  access medical databases and support on‐site telemetry of patient status. A commercial “open access”  multi‐provider  wireless  access  system  was  deployed  as  a  public–private partnership with a local Internet service provider (ISP); it provides citywide Wi‐Fi services in  the 2.4 GHz band. The city and  the  local  ISP partner have developed a subscription package that  is attractive to a wide range of commercial, residential, and public sector users. 

Designing  a  cost‐effective  broadband  wireless  network  for  the  City  of  Annapolis, Maryland.  This  network  serves  as  a  backbone  to  provide  connectivity  for  a  video surveillance system throughout downtown Annapolis. The network has the capacity to meet all current needs, provide 99.999 percent availability, and have substantial reserve capacity to support the addition of new video requirements, expanded IP‐based voice and data services, and support backhaul for a potential mobile wireless solution. 

Acting as  lead engineer for the design and  implementation of a microwave network to enable communications between public health agencies in Maryland and the District of Columbia. The microwave project is designed to provide connectivity to area hospitals to ensure reliable communications and data sharing in the event of problems with the public communications infrastructure. In addition, the robust microwave connectivity allows for day‐to‐day data sharing, voice communications, and interoperable communications. This connectivity will provide  the  transport mechanism necessary  for patient  tracking  and other information sharing platforms. 

 

Public Safety Networking 

Some representative examples of Mr. Wirth’s projects include: 

Designed, implemented and tested a backhaul network for the Arlington County, Virginia public safety radio network. The backhaul network consists of SONET equipment over a county‐owned  fiber optic network  that  increases  the  reliability  and  availability of  the public safety radio system. 

Lead engineer for the design and implementation of a 19‐jurisdiction regional fiber optic public  safety  interconnection  network  in  the  National  Capital  Region  (DC,  MD,  VA). NCRnet provides an  interoperable, robust, and reliable fiber  infrastructure to augment the  communication  capabilities  of  first  responder  communities  in  the  NCR.  These communities include local and regional law enforcement, fire, emergency management, transportation, and public health agencies.  

Performed radio frequency (RF) coverage analysis and prepared design recommendations for  improving public  safety  radio coverage  for Warren County, Pennsylvania.  Included 

Page 68 of 75

CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018   

43  

 

analysis  of  the  county’s  existing  public  safety  radio  system  and  recommendations  to improve  coverage  for  both  the  county’s  public  safety  radio  system  and  commercial cellular. 

Collaborated on the development of a master telecommunications plan for the Delaware Department of Transportation. The plan acts as a guide for the department to consolidate several disparate network environments into a unified communications network capable of supporting current and future transportation and public safety applications. Part of the plan involves developing a system‐level design that incorporates fiber optics, microwave, and land‐mobile radio. The plan requires coordination among a variety of state agencies to develop a network that meets the department’s critical public safety requirements.  

 

Video and Broadcast Communications Engineering 

Mr. Wirth’s  experience  includes  the  design  and  implementation  of  video,  voice,  and  data networks. Some select examples of his work include: 

Designed and  implemented a public, educational, and governmental  (PEG) access and monitoring network for Montgomery County, Maryland. The network uses IP‐based video encoders  and  the  County’s  state‐of‐the‐art  IT  network  to  improve  the  quality  and functionality of video transport throughout the county. 

Developed a design and integration solution for cablecast channels for Monterey County, California.  Analyzed  the  existing  audio‐visual  and  broadcast  systems  and  developed recommendations  for  future development. Designed an  IP‐based  video  server  system capable  of  recording  and  airing  live  meetings  and  scheduling  cable/broadcasts. Completed on‐site integration, testing, and training on the video server system. 

Designed  and  implemented  state‐of‐the‐art  videoconferencing  and  teleconferencing tools for the 19 jurisdictions in the National Capital Region Emergency Operations Centers (EOCs)  and  Emergency  Communications  Centers  (ECCs).  CTC  developed  the  systems’ designs and oversaw implementation to interconnect the EOCs and ECCs throughout the region,  under  a  grant  from  the  U.S.  Department  of  Homeland  Security  Urban  Areas Security Initiative (UASI).  

 

EDUCATION Bachelor of  Science,  Electrical  Engineering, University  of Virginia,  School  of  Engineering  and Applied Science, Charlottesville, Virginia, 2004.  PRIOR TO COMING TO CTC IN 2004 1998‐2003, Technician, Schnabel Engineering, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland  

Page 69 of 75

510 N. Baker St.Mount Dora, FL 32757

352-735-7126

DATE: October 16, 2018

TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members

FROM: Robin R. Hayes, City Manager

SUBJECT: Voluntary Annexation Process

Introduction:Provide feedback to streamline the voluntary annexation process.

Discussion:Voluntary annexation follows Chapter 171.044 Florida Statutes, as explained in Attachment #1. Eligible annexation proposals must be contiguous to the existing City Limits, the lands reasonably compact, and all owners must consent. The current annexation process tracks through the City’s normal development procedures: 1) Development Review Committee; 2) Planning and Zoning Commission; and 3) City Council with two readings of the ordinance. The current process that includes Joint Planning Area agreement notification of proposed petitions for annexation to Lake County takes approximately 90 days. As confirmed by the City Attorney, the process can be condensed and will allow for an expedited adoption. This change in process is consistent with Florida Statues and the City’s Land Development Code. The City's Land Development Code provides general steps for annexations (see Attachment #2). The change in the process would streamline voluntary annexation process from 90 days to 45 days (review by DRC, JPA Notice to County, and one reading/adoption of the ordinance). Florida Statutes enables these type of actions with only one ordinance reading.

Given the potential for the large number of voluntary annexations in an around the Wolf Branch Innovation District, this streamlined process will make the process more efficient. With the waiver of annexation application fees it is imperative to process these applications in the most efficient manner possible.

Budget Impact:The City's ad valorem tax base will expand as the City Limits of the City are annexed in a logical pattern.

City Council approved Resolution No. 2017-05 on January 17, 2017, waiving fees for a two-year period. The single-family annexation application fee of $150.00 has been waived. The fee

Page 70 of 75

Office of the City Manager Memorandum -- Page 2 of 2

waiver sunsets on January 17, 2019.

Strategic Impact:The City’s annexation program is consistent with Growth Management and Economic Development Goals for continuation of annexations of areas that are logical and fill in the logical and natural boundaries of the City Limits impacts the City in a favorable manner.

Recommendation City Council to provide direction to proceed with streamlining the annexation process.

Attachment(s):1. Florida Statutes2. Land Development Code

Prepared by: Vince Sandersfeld, Planning and Development DirectorReviewed by: Adam Sumner, CRA Administrator Approved - 09/19/2018

Tim Wilson, Approved - 09/25/2018Sherry Sutphen , City Attorney Approved - 10/10/2018Gwen Johns, City Clerk Approved - 10/11/2018Misty Sommer, Deputy City Clerk Approved - 10/11/2018Robin Hayes, City Manager Final Approval - 10/11/2018

Page 71 of 75

The 2018 Florida Statutes Title XII MUNICIPALITIES Chapter 171 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARIES View Entire Chapter

171.044 Voluntary annexation.—

(1) The owner or owners of real property in an unincorporated area of a county which is contiguous toa municipality and reasonably compact may petition the governing body of said municipality that saidproperty be annexed to the municipality.

(2) Upon determination by the governing body of the municipality that the petition bears thesignatures of all owners of property in the area proposed to be annexed, the governing body may, at anyregular meeting, adopt a nonemergency ordinance to annex said property and redefine the boundarylines of the municipality to include said property. Said ordinance shall be passed after notice of theannexation has been published at least once each week for 2 consecutive weeks in some newspaper insuch city or town or, if no newspaper is published in said city or town, then in a newspaper published inthe same county; and if no newspaper is published in said county, then at least three printed copies ofsaid notice shall be posted for 4 consecutive weeks at some conspicuous place in said city or town. Thenotice shall give the ordinance number and a brief, general description of the area proposed to beannexed. The description shall include a map clearly showing the area and a statement that thecomplete legal description by metes and bounds and the ordinance can be obtained from the office ofthe city clerk.

(3) An ordinance adopted under this section shall be filed with the clerk of the circuit court and thechief administrative officer of the county in which the municipality is located and with the Departmentof State within 7 days after the adoption of such ordinance. The ordinance must include a map whichclearly shows the annexed area and a complete legal description of that area by metes and bounds.

(4) The method of annexation provided by this section shall be supplemental to any other procedureprovided by general or special law, except that this section shall not apply to municipalities in countieswith charters which provide for an exclusive method of municipal annexation.

(5) Land shall not be annexed through voluntary annexation when such annexation results in thecreation of enclaves.

(6) Not fewer than 10 days prior to publishing or posting the ordinance notice required undersubsection (2), the governing body of the municipality must provide a copy of the notice, via certifiedmail, to the board of the county commissioners of the county wherein the municipality is located. Thenotice provision provided in this subsection may be the basis for a cause of action invalidating theannexation.

History.—s. 1, ch. 74-190; ss. 4, 5, ch. 75-297; s. 3, ch. 76-176; s. 2, ch. 86-113; s. 1, ch. 90-171; s. 16, ch. 90-279; s. 16, ch. 98-176; s. 3, ch. 2006-218.

Page 72 of 75

ATTACHMENT #2

LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE

CHAPTER I. OVERVIEW

1.3. Annexation.

Owners of land outside the city who desire to be incorporated within the city may petition for annexation subject to Florida law and the requirements of the city. The following steps should first be taken:

1. The existing city limits should be referenced to determine if the parcel is contiguous to the city.

2. The future land use map of the comprehensive plan should be referenced to determine if the parcel is within the city's planning area; annexations outside the planning area may also be considered.

3. City staff should be consulted to determine service capabilities, permitted land uses and the role of the county and other cities.

4. Petition. The petition for annexation must include:

a. Proof of ownership.

b. Name, address and signature of owner.

c. Survey, including legal description of property and street/road address.

d. Requested land use designation and zoning.

e. Method of providing services including water, sewer, roads, drainage, schools and police protection.

f. Justification for the proposal in relation to the comprehensive plans of the city and the county for ultimate review by the department of community affairs.

g. Processing fee.

Page 73 of 75

510 N. Baker St.Mount Dora, FL 32757

352-735-7126

DATE: October 16, 2018

TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members

FROM: Robin R. Hayes, City Manager

SUBJECT: Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update from GAI Community Solutions Group, Inc.

Introduction:GAI Community Solution Group, Inc. will present their findings to date in regard to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan and request feedback from City Council in a workshop format.

Discussion:The City of Mount Dora contracted with GAI Community Solutions Group, Inc. in February 2018 to create a Parks and Recreation Master Plan. To date, their work includes:

Over 1400 web-based and written surveys have been collected from residents that provide feedback on the existing park system and recreation programs, how they use the parks and recreation, and what improvements they would like to see in the future.

Three focus groups, with 52 stakeholders in attendance, were facilitated by GAI to gather information and perspective of the existing parks and recreations systems.

The Consultant has performed an analysis of facilities and documented the existing conditions of the City's parks and recreations facilities, including digital surveys and continuity with neighboring jurisdictions.

GAI has presented the findings to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, the Technical Advisory Committee in a joint meeting and gathered their feedback.

The Consultant facilitated an open pubic workshop on September 20, 2018 to review the findings and began visioning the future of the parks and recreation system.

During the presentation, GAI will deliver an Existing Condition Analysis and a Survey and Inventory Data Deliverable and will be seeking feedback from Council in a workshop format.

Page 74 of 75

Office of the City Manager Memorandum -- Page 2 of 2

Budget Impact:The presentation will have no impact on the budget, but may highlight parks and recreation facilities that need future investment.

Strategic Impact:The Parks and Recreation Master Plan contributes to the strategic growth management, economic development, infrastructure and public safety of Mount Dora.

Recommendation Staff recommends that Council give open and honest feedback to GAI Community Solutions Group consultants in order to improve the outcome of the Parks and Recreations Master Plan.

Prepared by: Amy Jewell, Leisure Services DirectorReviewed by: Gwen Johns, City Clerk Approved - 10/08/2018

Misty Sommer, Deputy City Clerk Approved - 10/08/2018Robin Hayes, City Manager Final Approval - 10/08/2018

Page 75 of 75


Recommended