MOUNT DORA CITY COUNCIL October 16, 2018, 2:00 PM
City Hall Board Room, 510 N. Baker Street
WORK SESSION AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
DISCUSSION ITEMS
1. Update on Economic Development Presented by Dr. Richard Levey
2. Fiber Business Model and Technology Consultant Presentation
3. Voluntary Annexation Process
4. Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update from GAI Community SolutionsGroup, Inc.
FUTURE MEETING DATES
• November 6, 2018, 1:00 PM, Work Session• November 6, 2018, 4:30 PM, Regular Session• November 20, 2018 6:00 PM, Regular Session• December 3, 2018, 6:00 PM, Regular Session• December 18, 2018, 3:00 PM Work Session (Strategic Planning)• December 18, 2018, 6:00 PM, Regular Session
City Hall510 N. Baker St.Mount Dora, FL 32757
Honorable Nick GironeMayor
ViceMayor Cathy Hoechst Councilmember AtLarge
Councilmember Laurie TillettDistrict 1
Councilmember Cal RolfsonDistrict 2
Councilmember John TuckerDistrict 3
Councilmember Marc CrailDistrict 4
Councilmember Harmon MasseyAtLarge
ADJOURNMENT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 286.0105, FLORIDA STATUTES, IF ANY PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE AT THIS MEETING WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT ANY MEETING OR HEARING, SUCH PERSON MAY NEED A RECORD OF THESE PROCEEDINGS. FOR SUCH PURPOSE, A PERSON MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. VERBATIM RECORD WILL NOT BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF MOUNT DORA.
NOTICE: IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990, PERSONS NEEDING A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING SHOULD CONTACT GWEN JOHNS, CITY CLERK, AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE PROCEEDINGS. TELEPHONE (352) 7357126 FOR ASSISTANCE. IF HEARING IMPAIRED, TELEPHONE THE FLORIDA RELAY SERVICE NUMBERS, (800) 955-8771 (TDD) OR (800) 955-8770 (VOICE) FOR ASSISTANCE.
PAGE
2
3
70
74
Page 1 of 75
510 N. Baker St.Mount Dora, FL 32757
352-735-7126
DATE: October 16, 2018
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Robin R. Hayes, City Manager
SUBJECT: Update on Economic Development - Presented by Dr. Richard Levey
Introduction:This is a routine update to be provided for the Wolf Branch Innovation District.
Discussion:Dr. Levey will provide an update on economic development and planning activities in the Wolf Branch Innovation District including annexation, land use and infrastructure needs.
Budget Impact:No budgetary impact to the Economic Update.
Strategic Impact:Economic Development with an impact on Infrastructure.
Recommendation Consultant to provide the City Council the quarterly update and open for discussion.
Prepared by: Gwen Johns, City ClerkReviewed by: Tim Wilson, Approved - 10/08/2018
Misty Sommer, Deputy City Clerk Approved - 10/09/2018Gwen Johns, City Clerk Approved - 10/09/2018Robin Hayes, City Manager Final Approval - 10/10/2018
Page 2 of 75
510 N. Baker St.Mount Dora, FL 32757
352-735-7126
DATE: October 16, 2018
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Robin R. Hayes, City Manager
SUBJECT: Fiber Business Model and Technology Consultant Presentation
Introduction:This is a request for City Council to review the Fiber Business Model and Service Provider Presentation regarding the Wolf Branch Innovation District.
Discussion:Community fiber networks have varying uses and more and more communities are leveraging their network to become a robust asset for their community. A municipal fiber network can help the City become more resilient for upcoming technical and societal changes. It can help provide our constituents with options for high-speed broadband internet service as well as smart city initiatives.
Municipal fiber networks can help communities stimulate and attract new businesses, attract and retain residents, lower dependency on large incumbent communication companies, and adapt to technology changes and demands. According to the Fiber Broadband Association, fiber speeds equal improved economic performance. Fiber gives consumers access to fast speeds and the entire city with opportunities for economic growth to include more jobs, more innovation, and incentives for additional infrastructure investments and companies relocating or expanding into the City. The association claimed in a 2015 study (https://www.fiberbroadband.org/blog/study-shows-home-values-up-3.1-with-access-to-fiber) that fiber to the home increases home values by up to 3.1 percent.
Staff coordinated meetings with various technology consultants and service provider vendors to learn about potential business opportunities, review our Innovation District plans, and gather information. We met with three technology-consulting companies that offer consulting, engineering, business planning and negotiations, Magellan Advisors, Columbia Telecommunications Corporation (CTC), and Fujitsu. We also met with service providers to include PCS Fiber (our current fiber vendor), Summit Broadband, and WANRack. Magellan Advisors (attachment 1) and CTC (attachment 2) provided us proposals for consulting services to offer the City long-term “smart community” design and architecture. Fujitsu was unable to
Page 3 of 75
Office of the City Manager Memorandum -- Page 2 of 2
present a proposal in the time frame we provided.
We asked Magellan Advisors to present information to the Council as it relates to the Innovation District project and the services they offer. CTC was unable to attend the Council work session as our contact at CTC had a prior commitment and sends their regrets.
Budget Impact:None at this time, budgetary impacts may be paid for by a provider based on the direction of the City Council and the Wolf Branch Innovation District plan.
Strategic Impact:Economic development and growth management as well as internal and external communication.
Recommendation City Council to provide direction on Innovation District fiber technology consulting services.
Attachment(s):1. Magellan Proposal - ICT Master Plan Wolf Branch2. CTC Proposal
Prepared by: Gwen Johns, City ClerkReviewed by: Johnna Shamblin, IT Manager Approved - 10/09/2018
Tim Wilson, Approved - 10/09/2018Gwen Johns, City Clerk Approved - 10/09/2018Misty Sommer, Deputy City Clerk Approved - 10/09/2018Robin Hayes, City Manager Final Approval - 10/10/2018
Page 4 of 75
Proposal
InformationandCommunicationsTechology(ICT)MasterPlanfortheWolfBranch
InnovationDistrictCityofMountDora,FL
Prepared For: Robin Hayes City Manager
Prepared by: Courtney Violette Chief Operating Officer Magellan Advisors O: 386.931.3520 E: [email protected] www.magellan-advisors.com 999 18th Street, Suite 3000 Denver, CO 80202
ATTACHMENT #1
Page 5 of 75
2
OverviewofMagellanAdvisorsMagellanAdvisors,LLCisaColorado-basedfirmwithlocalofficesinDenver,CO,LosAngeles,CAandMiami,FL.Magellan’sprimaryaddressis99918thStreet,Suite3000Denver,CO80202.MagellanAdvisors,LLCwasfoundedinJanuaryof2004andhasbeeninoperationasaLimitedLiabilityCompanysinceinception.WeareaFloridaSmallBusinessEnterprisebasedoutofDenver,Colorado.Magellan’sofficenumberis888.960.5299.
Magellanprovidesleadingbroadband,smartcity,informationtechnologyandsecurityconsultingservicestopublicandprivate organizations. We are a full spectrum planning and implementationfirm that brings togethertechnology,communicationsandutilityconsultingtocreatesmartgigabitcitiesoftomorrow.
Our professionals bring years of experience from the broadband, telecom, information technology and governmentsectors.We are thought leaders and real-world implementers of broadband and smart city networksthat keepcommunitiescompetitiveinthedigitalworld.
Unlikemostconsultingfirms,wepartnerwithourclientseverystepoftheway,whethertheyaredeployinginstitutionalfibernetworks,developingbroadbandpublic-privatepartnershipsordeployingsmartcitynetworks.Wearea“hands-on”firmwithstrongprojectmanagementabilitiesandimplementationskillstoseeourclient’sprojectsthroughfromconcepttocompletion.
Weareonlysuccessfulwhenourclientsaresuccessful.Ourgoalistodeliverpracticalbroadbandandtechnologysolutionsthatourclientscanimplementintheircommunities.Throughourservices,over$1billionofnewfiberinvestmentshavebeenmadeconnectingmorethan1,000schools,hospitals,librariesandgovernmentsandpassingnearly1millionhomeswithfiber.
Broadband Fiber To The Home
Cellular & DAS
Utilities
Grid Security Energy Efficiency
Transportation
Vehicle Detection EV
Charging
Healthcare Telehealth Telemedicine
Public Safety Video Surveillance Sensor Networks
Page 6 of 75
4
PortfolioofServices Magellan istheonlyfirmthatprovidescomprehensivebroadbandplanning, implementationandprojectmanagementservices,enablingourclientswithaturnkeyconsultingpartnerthathelpsthemthrougheverystepoftheprocess.Ourprojectteamsarecomprisedofprofessionalswithsignificantoperationalexperienceinthebroadband,publicutility,localgovernment,smartcityand informationtechnologysectors.Unlikemanyconsultingfirms,wehavedeepbusinessandoperationalexpertiseplanning,buildingandmanagingnetworks,skillsthatareparamounttohelpingourclientsplanandimplement their own broadband networks and smart city initiatives by creating effective internal and externalpartnerships.Our consultantsdevelop real-world,actionable strategies thatorganizations can relyon to support thedevelopmentoftheirbroadbandandsmartcityinitiatives.Nootherfirmintheindustryhasthesecombinedcapabilities.
Magellanusesacustomizedapproach ineveryprojectbasedontheneedsofourclientsandtheircommunities.Wedevelop innovative solutions that allow public and private organizations to best utilize their strengths to expandbroadbandanddevelopsmartcityapplications.Magellanisattheforefrontofpublic-privatepartnershipdevelopment,working to negotiate and forge these partnerships between public organizations and private broadband providers.Conqueringbroadbandissuesoftentakestheparticipationofmultiplepartiesthatarealignedaroundcommongoals.Magellanhelpscommunitiesrecruitinnovativeprovidersandformstrategicpartnershipsthatbenefitprovidersandthecommunitiestheyserve.Magellanalsoprovidesstrategicplanswithblueprintsforcitiestobuild,expandandoperatetheirmunicipalfibernetworksshouldtheychosetodoso.
FeasibilityStudiesMagellanhelpspublicorganizationsandbroadbandoperatorsdeterminereasonableexpectationsfordeployingfibertothepremisenetworks.Wedevelopcomprehensivefeasibilitystudiesthatassessthecurrentbroadbandenvironmentanddeterminetheopportunitiestodeployadvancedbroadbandnetworks.Ourfeasibilitystudiesarerealworldtestedandbasedonthelatestbroadbandindustrytrendsthatprovidestrategicdirectionforcommunitiestoachievetheirbroadbandandsmartcitygoals.
• CommunityNeedsAssessments • BusinessModels&FinancialPlanning• MarketAnalysis&CurrentEnvironment • Design&Engineering• NetworkAnalysis&Inventory • Opportunity,Risk&BenefitAnalysis
BroadbandEngineeringOurbroadbanddesignandengineeringservicesprovidethelatesttechnicaldesignsforfiber-to-the-premise,backbone,metroandlong-haulnetworks.Ourwirelessdesignandengineeringservicesdevelopeffectivefixedwireless,microwaveand WiFi networks to cover the most challenging terrain. Our services cover all aspects of broadband design andengineering, from outside plant fiber andwireless, to equipment, to services and content, to BSS/OSS and systemsintegration.
• FTTH,FTTP,Metro&Long-HaulFiber • Routing,Switching&MPLS• FixedWireless,Microwave&WiFi • Internet,Voice&VideoIntegration• GPON,ActiveEthernet&WDM • BSS/OSS&NetworkManagementSystems
888 960 5299 g1g @magellan-adv1sors com Page 8 of 75
5
BusinessModels&PartnershipsMagellanisontheforefrontofemergingbusinessmodelsandpartnershipdevelopmentwithinthebroadbandindustry.Wesuccessfullyplan,negotiateandexecutepartnershipagreementsbetweenpublicorganizationsandprivateoperators,leveragingthestrengthsofeachorganizationtobenefitthecommunity.WehaveastellarrecordofrecruitingbroadbandproviderstolocalcommunitiesandhelpingtheseorganizationsmaketheircommunitiesGigabitReady.
• DarkFiber,OpenAccess,TriplePlay • PartnerRecruitment&RFQs• FeasibilityAnalysisofBusinessModels • Advocacy&NegotiationinPartnerships• Public-PrivatePartnershipDevelopment • Opportunity,Risk&BenefitAnalysis
Financing&GrantsMagellan provides extensive financial planning services for organizations looking to invest in advanced broadbandnetworks. Our extensive financial plans help government organizations and private operators understand theopportunitiesandrisksandthemostfeasiblefinancialstrategiestoachievetheirgoals.Ourplansareinvestmentreadyand are routinely used to support fundingwith bond underwriters, banks, private equity firms and grant programs.Magellanalsomaintainsaportfoliooffinancingpartnersandgrantprogramsthatwebringtocommunitiestohelpthemacquirefunding.
• Investment-ReadyFinancialPlans • BroadbandGrantWriting&Management• FundingDevelopment • FCC,E-Rate,CAF&StatePrograms• PartnerRecruitment • EconomicDevelopmentGrantPrograms
ProjectManagementMagellanhelpsoperators,utilitiesandgovernmentorganizations implementnext-generationnetworksandsmartcityinitiatives.Weprovideturnkeyprojectmanagementservicesthatenabletheseorganizationstomaintainresourcesthatcovereveryaspectofdeployingbroadbandnetworks,fromfiberandwirelessnetworkdeployment,toequipmentandcontentintegration,tomarketingandsales,tooperationsandmanagement.Magellanprovidestheonlyturnkeysolutionthat enables these organizations to deploy their networks in a timely manner and launch their networks with theconfidencetoachievethebestresultsintheircommunities.
• Procurement&ContractNegotiation• ConstructionManagement
• ContentAcquisition&Agreements• Sales,Marketing&BusinessDevelopment
• NetworkCommissioning&Certification • Business&OperationsManagement
PolicyDevelopmentMagellanmaintainsknowledgeofbestpracticeinpolicydevelopmentandorganizationalstructureforimplementingandoperatingbroadbandnetworksandsmartcityinitiatives.Wehelpmunicipalitiesandutilitiesorganizeandrefineinternalbusinessprocessesforimprovedcommunications,projectmanagement,financialmanagementandpolicydevelopment.Weprovideour clientsa knowledgebaseof zoning, rightofwaymanagementandwirelesspolicies forenablingandfacilitating the development of broadband infrastructures and smart city initiatives.Our recommendations generatebusinessprocessesandworkflowsthatimproveinternalandexternalpartnershipsforstreamliningongoingexpansionofbroadbandandsmartcitydeployments.
888 960 5299 g1g @magellan-adv1sors com Page 9 of 75
6
• RightofWayManagementOrdinance• WirelessOrdinance&Guidelines
• DigOnce&JointTrenchPolicies• TelecommunicationsMasterFunding
• FiberOrdinance&Guidelines • Internal&ExternalWorkingGroups
AdditionalServicesMagellanprovidesawiderangeofsupplementaryservices in informationtechnologyandsecurity,smartcityplanningandnetworkingtechnologyfields.Manyofourservicescomplementoneanother,allowingMagellantoprovideaone-stop-shopforourclients’fullrangeofbroadband,smartcity,ITandsecurityneeds.Magellan’sexpertsleadtheindustryinplanninganddeployingthelatesttechnologysolutionstomeetawiderangeofbusinessneeds.AstheInternetofThingstransitionsfromconcepttoreality,Magellanhelpsitsclientsadapttotherapidlychangingworldandpreparecommunitiestothriveinthedigitaldomain.
• InformationTechnology• SmartCityConsulting
• UtilitySecurity&SCADAConsulting• PCICompliance&Implementation
• PublicSafetyCJISConsulting • InformationSecurityConsulting
888 960 5299 g1g @magellan-adv1sors com Page 10 of 75
7
KeyPrincipals
CourtneyViolette–ChiefOperatingOfficerCourtneyhas leddozensofmunicipalbroadbandplanningand implementationprojectsacrossthe country. He is a Certified Fiber-To-The-Home Professional and holds several technicalcertifications in broadband, information technology and information security. Prior to joiningMagellan,hespent6yearsastheCIOfortheCityofPalmCoast.Duringthistime,heplannedandbuiltthefirsttrueCity-ownedopen-accessnetworkintheSoutheast.Throughhisleadership,thenetworkgrewtoservegovernment,business,educationandhealthcareneedsacrosstheCity,saving these organizations millions of dollars and providing gigabit connectivity to meet thecommunity’sneeds.CourtneyholdsaMA in InformationTechnologyManagementandaBS inComputerSciencefromWebsterUniversity.
MarkLane–SeniorTechnicalConsultantMark Lane has over 30 years of experience in enterprise IT, carrier network operations, andtechnology consulting. While serving as CTO for Bristol Virginia Utilities OptiNet, he helpedprovide thestrategicdirectionandpractical implementation responsible for their fiber-to-the-premise (FTTP) network build-out and broadband service deployment for eight counties inSouthwestVA.HisvisionandleadershipcontributedtoBristolVAbeingselectedasanIntelligentCommunityForumTop7IntelligentCityin2009.MarkreceivedaBachelorsinComputerSciencefromtheUniversityofTennessee.
DanHowick–VPDesignandConstructionDan Howick has over 15 years of experience working in the planning, layout and design oftelecommunicationsnetworks,specializinginfiberoptics.Heworkshand-inhandwithsomeofthenation’slargestserviceproviderswhorelyonhisreputationandindustryknowledgetohelpdesignand installadvancedfiber-opticsystemsthroughouttheCountry.Dan’sexpertise inthetelecommunicationsindustryfocusesonfiber-opticnetworksinboththeinsideandoutsideplantenvironments.Hisresponsibilitieshaveincludedthelayout,anddesignofoutsideplantnetworksforcarriers,theUnitedStatesGovernment,localmunicipalities,andprivatenetworks.Danexcelsin the areas of route planning and optimization, as-built recording and development, plantverificationanddocumentation,AutoCADlayoutforbothplan&profileviewsforconstruction.Dan also has extensive experience in best practices, methods and procedures fordesign/installationinfiberopticsincludingterminations,splicingandtesting.
Page 11 of 75
8
GillianVioletteEd.D–ResearchAnalystGillianhasoveradecadeworkinginbusinessmanagementandsalesinfieldsofpharmaceuticals,hospitality, insurance,and traininganddevelopment.Shehasexperience inmanaginghumanresourcerelatedfunctions,staffing,andprojectmanagement.GillianjoinedtheMagellanteaminthecapacityofresearch,publication,andqualityassuranceinreporting.SherecentlyattainedadoctoraldegreeinEducationalLeadershipwhereherresearchfocuswasrelatedtobroadbandInternetinK-12schoolsandthedigitaldivide.
TimScott–SeniorConsultantTimhasaninternational,broadanddiversebackgroundacrossnearly20yearsofexperienceinthetelecommunicationsandbroadbandmarkets.Wellknownacrossthefiberindustry,Timhasspokenatvariousindustryeventssharinghispassionandknowledgerelatedtothebenefitsfiberinfrastructure can bring to local communities. Tim enjoys engaging with local governments,findingabalancebetween the interestsofpublicandprivatesectors,and thendefining thesethrough Public Private Partnership engagements. Tim has a sound business and technologyunderstandingwithbothproduct,operations,andcarrierexperiencesacrossvariousbroadbandnetworkengagementsthatincludeboththeprivateandpublicsectors.
Dr.GregLaudeman–ProjectManagerGregLaudeman isa leader in innovative, talentand technology-basedeconomicdevelopmentstrategy, research, and implementation.He is the Executive& Founderof Eduity, LLC,whichprovides talent-and technology-basedeconomicdevelopment services,and isapplying socialmedia to transform workforce planning and development. Greg’s diverse experience as ananalyst,communicator,facilitator,andorganizerhasalwaysfocusedonhowtechnologycanmakecommunitiesandorganizationsmorecompetitive,innovative,andproductive.ForoveradecadeGreg led community technology outreach efforts for theGeorgia Tech Enterprise InnovationInstitute.Greghasadoctorate inLearningandLeadershipfromtheUniversityofTennesseeatChattanooga,hasmasterdegrees inPublicPolicy fromGeorgiaTechandTelecommunicationsfromMichiganState,andabachelordegreeinMassCommunicationfromUTC.
EricOgle–SeniorBroadbandConsultant
Erichasspentmostofhiscareerinvolvedinplanningandpolicywithfocusontechnology-driveneconomicdevelopmentforAppalachiancommunities.PriortojoiningMagellan,Ericspent13years as Research Associate with University of Tennessee’s Baker Center for Public Policy.Amongsignificantprojects,EricleddevelopmentofthefirsttwocommunitywirelessnetworksintheSoutheast.ErichasprojectmanagementexperienceservingasPrincipalInvestigatorforcorporateand federal sponsors,oftenengaging stakeholders inparticipatoryprocesses.Ericholdspositionsinorganizations,includingaroleasTreasureroftheRuralTelecommunicationCongress.Prior toUT,EricheldeconomicdevelopmentpositionswithNewportUtilities, theTennesseeValleyAuthority,andCockeCountygovernment.EricholdsanMSinPlanningandaBS inBusinessAdministration,MarketingandLogistics,all from theUniversityofTennessee,Knoxville.
Page 12 of 75
9
ProjectOverviewTheavailabilityofadvancedcommunicationsand technology inourcommunitieshasbecomeadetermining factor inselectingwherewelive,workandplay.ThisiswellevidencedandsupportedintheconceptualvisionoftheWolfBranchInnovation District (“District”), an area defined by a JPA for the establishment of an employment based economicidevelopmentdistrict. TheCityofMountDorahas theopportunity todevelop an Information andCommunicationsTechnology (“ICT”)Master Plan that guides theDistrict development, incorporating communications and technologyinfrastructure as a driving element to the evolution of the project, ensuring next-generation world-classtelecommunicationsservicesareavailablefromdayone.InorderfortheDistricttobedesignedasa“SmartCommunity”fromthegroundup,MountDorawillrequireawell-architectedcommunicationsandtechnologystrategytoembracetheneedsofaneco-friendly,technologicallyadvancedcommunity.ToensuretheMountDoravisionfortheWolfBranchInnovationDistrictisrealized,acomprehensiveICTMasterPlanisnecessarytoimplementlong-termSmartCommunitystrategies.ThisPlanwillplayapivotalroleindeterminingthefutureof theDistrict’s long-term communicationsand technology capabilities,andas such,MountDoraneedsa consultingpartnerthathasextensiveexperience inthesecorepracticesand is focusedona“completecommunity”approachtomaster planning. Magellan Advisors has far reaching experience with local governments, economic planners anddeveloperswithICTmasterplanning,providingfull-cycleadvisoryservicestoclientsdomesticallyandinternationally.ItisalsocriticalthatMountDoradeveloptheDistrictsothatthePlanisn’tlimitedtoanyspecifictechnology,manufacturerorserviceprovider.MagellanAdvisorswillworksolelyonbehalfofMountDoratodeveloptherightICTMasterPlanfortheneedsofMountDoraandthedevelopmentitisbuilding.Magellandoesnotsellorrepresentanytechnologycompany,manufacturer,serviceproviderorotherorganizationthatmay influencethemasterplanningprocessesforourclients’projects.Instead,weassistourclientsindevelopingmasterplansthatprovideubiquitouscommunicationsandtechnologyservices in their communities. This allows for long-term flexibility and accommodation of many different types oftechnologiesinthesecommunities,ensuringtheyarenot“lockedin”tospecificsystemsorvendors.MagellanunderstandstheuniqueneedsofSmartCommunityplanningandworkswithstakeholderstoensuretheirvisionis captured in themasterplanningprocess.Weprovide the full spectrumofcommunicationsand technologymasterplanning, includingneedsassessments,businessandorganizationalplanning,economicdevelopmentplanning,marketanalysisandresearch,designandengineering,financialplanning, implementationandprojectmanagement.Ourdeepexpertise in thesecorecompetencieswillprovideMountDorawithastrategicpartnerwhocandevelopa long-term,SmartCommunitymasterplanfortheDistrict,andotherkeyareasoftheCity.Magellan Advisors will embrace the Smart Community vision as the primary driver in designing and specifying thecommunicationsandtechnologyneeds fortheDistrict. TheproposedmasterplanwillbedesignedwithcapacityanddeliverymechanismstosupportcurrentlyproposedandpotentialSmartCommunityfeaturesoftheDistrict,including:
• SmartGridTechnology.AWolfBranchInnovationDistrictbroadbandnetworkwillfacilitatetheimplementationofSmartGridTechnologytoensurethemosteffectiveuseandmanagementofsolargenerated(andutility)powerprovidedtotheproject.Thenetworkwillconnectend-pointswithcentralmanagementsystemsandallowpowertoberedirectedfromareasoflowconsumptiontoareasofhighdemandinrealtime,thusloweringconsumptionandcosttotheenduser.
• AutomaticMeter Reading/AdvancedMetering Infrastructure. AWolfBranch InnovationDistrictbroadbandnetwork will support the implementation of Automatic Meter Reading (AMR), and Advanced MeteringInfrastucture (AMI) to further reduce the creation of carbon emissions, contribute to the District’s SmartCommunityvisionandallowforastreamlinedutilitymanagementsystem.
888 960 5299 g1g @magellan-adv1sors com Page 13 of 75
10
• UbiquitousWireless.AWolfBranchInnovationDistrictbroadbandnetworkwillsupportthecapabilitytoprovideubiquitous wireless coverage, allowing end users to access information anytime, anywhere. Additionally,ubiquitouswirelesscoveragecanfacilitateandenhancemanypublicservicesrangingfrombuildinginspections,AMR/AMI,emergencymanagementandpublic safety.Furthermore, thewirelessnetworkwillenable locale-commerce, online advertising and other mechanisms supporting economic development for citizens andbusinesses.
• Video Surveillance. A Wolf Branch Innovation District broadband network will enable a video surveillancenetwork providing support for trafficmanagement, public safety, emergencymanagement and other criticalservices.
• IntelligentTransportationSystems.AWolfBranchInnovationDistrictbroadbandnetworkwillsupportIntelligentTransportationSystemor ITS. ITSwillprovide a“smart” trafficmanagementplatform fortheDistrict,and itssurroundingarea.Fibercomponentsoftheinfrastructurewillbeleveragedtomanagetrafficsignalization,flowandreroutingutilizinganintelligentreal-timemonitoringsystem.
• Autonomous Vehicles. A Wolf Branch Innovation District broadband network will provide the criticalinfrastructure for planned Autonomous Vehicles. Fiber-based infrastructure will provide data trunks whilewireless components of the infrastructure will ensure constant communications and management of eachindividualvehicle.
• ConnectedCity.AWolfBranchInnovationDistrictbroadbandnetworkwillbedesignedtointerconnectwithothernetworksintheregionwhilesupportingMountDora’svisionoftheDistrictbeinganadvancedemploymentcenter,located within the greater Orlando metro. The network will facilitate high-speed/high-bandwidthinterconnectionbetweenothergovernmental,educational,andprivatesectornetworks,ensuringthattheDistrictwillbeoneofthemostconnecteddevelopmentsintheworld.
• Teleworkers.AWolfBranchInnovationDistrictbroadbandnetworkwillenablesmartbusinessestofullyleveragethecostsavingsofteleworkerswhilefurtheringthegreenprinciplesoftheproject.Byremovingcommutersandvehiclesfromthestreets,businesseswillenableemployeestobemoreproductiveandefficientwhilereducingtheir carbon footprint through teleworking. The network will connect employees to their businesses andbusinessestotheircustomers.
• SmartHome.AWolfBranchInnovationDistrictbroadbandnetworkwillenablethesmarthomeconcept,allowingresidentstomanagevirtuallyeveryfeatureoftheirhomeanytime,anywhere.
• Triple andQuadruple Play. Thenetwork infrastructurewillbedesigned to supportdeliveryof internet,HDtelevision,voiceandwirelessservicesseamlessly,eitherprovideddirectlybytheWolfBranchInnovationDistrictor via a third-party operating on the network through a P3 agreement. This will create potential revenuegenerationopportunitiesforMountDoraandprovideresidentswithachoiceofserviceproviders.Thenetworkwillbedesigned toaccommodatenextgeneration technologies thatwillplace theDistrict faraheadofothercommunitieswhohavenotembracedSmartCommunitymasterplanningprocesses.
• EconomicDevelopment. Themereexistenceofacomprehensivecommunity informationandcommunicatinstechnologyplatformwillgreatlyenhanceeconomicdevelopmentopportunitiesfortheWolfBranchInnovationDistrict. Availability of resources to private sector business (particularly research, high-tech, healthcare, lifesciences,greentechnologyandeducation)willimprovetheproject’slikelihoodofattractingnewindustriestothecommunity.Inaddition,afocusedICTmasterplanwillfosterthedevelopmentoflocalbusiness“ecosystems”thatcanpromotenewbusinesscreation,start-upincubatorsandothereconomicdevelopmentbenefits.
888 960 5299 g1g @magellan-adv1sors com Page 14 of 75
11
• TechnologyScalability.AWolfBranchInnovationDistrictbroadbandnetworkwillbedesignedtosupportbothshort-term and long-term demands. The networkwill be designedwith scalability inmind to support newtechnologiesandinnovationswellintothefuture,ensuringnetworkviabilityfordecadestocome.
888 960 5299 g1g @magellan-adv1sors com Page 15 of 75
12
StatementofWorkThisprojectwillcreateacomprehensiveICTMasterPlanthatwillallowMountDoratoincorporateaSmartCommunitydesignintotheDistrict.ThePlanwillenableMountDorato“futureproof”theDistrictbycreatingacommunity-wideICTstrategythatwillsecure theDistrict’sroleasaSmartCommunity,andadvancedemploymentcenter.Theprojectwillprovide comprehensive information, analysis, strategies and recommendations thatwill equipMountDorawith thenecessary informationtomake informeddecisionsonhowto invest inSmartCommunity infrastructureandprograms.ThePlanwill includemarket,business,operational,regulatory,financialandtechnicalanalysisofcommunicationsandtechnologyinfrastructurefortheDistrictandprovideablueprintforimplementingtheseopportunitiesinthelong-term.ThePlanwillfocusheavilyonthecommunicationsandnetworkcapabilitiesoftheDistrictasthesecoreareasprovidebotha foundation forSmartCommunitytechnologiesandapotentialrevenuesource forMountDora indevelopingacommunicationsutility.
TheprojectwillincludethefollowingcriticalareasrequiredforacomprehensiveICTMasterPlan:
Task1:NeedsAssessmentThisneedsassessmentwillidentifycommoncommunicationsandtechnologyneedsformanytypesofusersthatwillbepresent in theDistrict, including residential,business,enterprise,municipal,education,healthcare,public safety andcommunity support.Wewillprovidea long-term forecast for the type,capacityand locationofcommunicationsandtechnologyservicesrequiredofthesedifferentclassesofusers.Magellanwillprovideguidance,examplesandcasestudiesofvariouscommunitiesthathaveimplementedadvancedcommunicationsandtechnologyprograms.WewillhelpMountDoradeterminewhichprogramswillleadfutureinnovationtokeeptheDistrict“aheadofthecurve.”BasedonMountDora’svisionfortheDistrict,wewillhelpidentifyprogramsthatfitwithinandpromotethisvision.Task2:MarketAnalysisThismarketanaylsiswillprovidequantitativeresearchontheavailabilityofbroadband,communicationsandtechnologyservicesintheMountDoraarea,andspecifically,theareassurroundingtheDistrict.ThisisacriticalinputtotheDistrictPlantoidentifywhatservicescurrentlyexistinrelationtotheservicesthatwillberequired.ItwillbeimportantthattheDistrict’s telecommunications services are far above the standard legacy copper services that exist in surroundingcommunities.Keytothisanalysis isanunderstandingoftheregionalnetworksthatwillprovide“backhaul”servicestointerconnectwith the City and theDistrict.Where highways interconnect local roads to the regional infrastructure,backhaulservicesconnectlocalcommunicationsservicestotheelectronicworld.Thisphaseoftheprojectwilldocumentcurrentandplannedinfrastructure,identifyinterconnectionpointswithintheDistrictandplanfacilitiesthatwillenableinterconnectionwithcarriers,contentprovidersandothertelecoms. Itwillalso identify“datacenter”andco-locationfacilitiesthatmayberequiredwithintheDistricttoenhanceitsconnectivitytotheoutsideworldandpromotetheSmartCommunity,“hightech”mission.Task3:VisioningThevisioningphaseoftheprojectbuildsonthepreviouslycompletedneedsassessmentbyidentifyingtheservicesandfeaturesthatwillbeplannedfortheDistrict.Throughoutthisphase,Magellan,theCity,anditsPlanningConsultantswillworktogethertodeterminewhatcommunicationsandtechnologyservicesfitwellwithintheDistrictproject,basedonthe long-termgoalsofMountDorafortheproject.Inthisphase,wewillcovertherealmoffeaturesenabled inSmartCommunitiesasdescribedintheExecutiveSummary.
Page 16 of 75
13
Theseincludebutarenotlimitedto:
• SmartGridTechnology• AutomaticMeterReading• UbiquitousWireless• VideoSurveillance• IntelligentTransportationSystems• AutonomousVehicles• ConnectedCity• Teleworkers
• SmartHome• TripleandQuadruplePlay• EconomicDevelopment• TechnologyScalability• E-Commerce• DataCenterFacilitiesandCo-Location• NewEconomyFocus
Task4:BusinessModelDevelopmentDeterminationoftherightbusinessmodelwithintheDistrict’sICTMasterPlanwillbeessentialtoensureMountDoraidentifiesviableopportunitiesanddevelopssoundbusinessstrategiestocapturethem.MagellanwillassistMountDorainevaluatingthevariousutilitybusinessmodelsthatareavailable,identifyingtheprosandconsofeach.Wehaveworkedwithdozensofutilityproviders,privateandpublicoperators,whohaveimplementeddifferentbusinessmodels.WewillassistMountDoraindetermininghowthesemodelswillfitintotheDistrict’senvironment.Wealsounderstandhowthelegalandregulatoryenvironment influencesdifferentbusinessmodelsandwilladviseMountDoraonthese importantfacetsofutilityplanning,toensurethattheorganizationmeetsalllegalandregulatoryguidelinesinitsinitiative.Justafewofthebusinessmodelswehaveworkedwithfromourexperiencesinclude:
Provider BusinessModel DescriptionofModel
CityofRanchoCucamonga,CA
Public-PrivatePartnership(P3)
City owned fiber-optic network utilized to provide next-generationbroadbandservices tobusiness, residentsandcommunity anchors through a P3. The City has alsoconditioned all new development, so underground fiber-optic infrastructure in included in all green-fielddevelopment.
CityofPalmCoast,FL Open-AccessCity owned fiber-to-the-premise network with multipleservice providers delivering business-class services overfiberandwirelesstobusinessesandcommunityanchors.
NewportUtilities,TN RetailTriple-Play City owned municipal electric utility deployed FTTHthroughoutitselectricserviceterritoryasaretailprovider.
CityofWinterHaven,FL DarkFiberLeasing Cityownedconduitandfiberisleasedtoserviceproviders,andorganizationsonafiberstrandbasis.
MagellanAdvisorswillassistindevelopingabusinessstrategythattakesintoaccounttheshortandlong-termbusinessopportunitiesthatwillpresentthemselvesasthecommunicationsandtechnologyinfrastructurebecomesavailable.OurconsultantswillassistMountDorainidentifyingtherightpositioningthatwillbeusedtomarket,sellandoperateaworld-classSmartCommunitysystem.Thebusinessstrategywillprovideatechnicaldefinitionregardingtheattributesoftheinfrastructure.Thedefinitionsandtermsused,suchas“carrier-class”or“99.999%”,willdefinethelevelofacceptanceandultimatesuccessofthisnetworkwithinthecommunity. Basedontheneedsassessmentandtechnicaldesignforservices,MagellanwillassistMountDorainthedefinitionofitsserviceofferingsandthemessagingthatwillbeprovidedtothemarketregardingtheseservices,asdetailedintheMarketingProgramandDevelopmentsection.WewillassisttheCityinforgingthecorrectmessagingabouttheDistrictsICTPlan.
Page 17 of 75
14
Task5:MarketingProgramandDevelopmentBased on the needs assessment, and vision developed through themaster planning process,Magellanwill define amarketingprogramwhichMountDoracanusetocommunicatethevisionoftheDistrict,emphasizingitscommunicationsandtechnologyinfrastructure.WewillassistMountDoraindevelopinganeffectivemarketingandcommunicationsplanthatwillallowtheCitytodelivertherightmessagingtoitstargetmarketanduseSmartCommunityfeaturesthroughoutitsmarketingcampaigns.Wewillfocuson:
• PromotingtheDistrictasaSmartCommunity;• IdentifyandimplementeffectivemessagingabouttheSmartCommunity;• WorktosocializetheDistrict’splanwithindustryandvendorsthatcouldhaveinterestinpartneringwiththeCity
todriveinnovationwithinthearea;• ProvidedetaileddiagramsandschematicsoftheSmartCommunity;and,• IdentifySmartCommunitytargetmarketsforbusinessandindustry.
Task6:SmartCommunityIntegrationSmartCommunitydesignrequiresthatallcommunicatinsandtechnology initiativesbeplannedasasingle, integratedsystem.Buildingonthe largerTechnicalPlan,thisareawill focusondevelopingright integrationbetweenthevarioustechnologies that are proposed for the communications and technology system.We approach integration from the“ground up” by first developing a foundation of technologies that will be used within the District. Building on thisfoundation,wewilloverlaytheapplicationsthatwillbedeployed,ensuringeachapplicationfitswithinthetechnologyfoundation.Task7:CommunicationsandTechnologyTechnicalPlanThisphaseoftheplanwillcreateatechnicaldesignfortheDistrict,basedontheassessmentandtheobjectivesoftheproject.ThePlanwillincludethefollowing:
• OutsideandInsidePlant• UtilityeasementsandROWplanning• Towersitelocationsandplanning(micro
andmacro)• SmartStreetLighting• Fiber-OpticandWirelessOptions• CentralOffice/DataCenterDesign• Core,DistributionandEdgeNetwork
Elements
• CustomerPremiseEquipmentOptions• Protocols,RoutingandServiceDelivery• QOS,SecurityandAccounting• HighAvailabilityandRedundancy• OperationalSupportSystems• BusinessSupportSystems• InventoryManagementSystems
Thedesignwillbeprovidedwithacompletesetofengineeringdiagrams illustratingthedifferent layersofthesystem,including:
• Physicalfiber/wirelessdesignandmileage• Networkelementdesignandlocation• IPlayerdesignforrouting/switching• Bandwidthandcapacity• Centraloffice/Datacenterlayoutand
engineering
• Interconnectionpoints• Towerlocations(microandmacro)• Leasedfacilitiesforwireline/wireless
services
WewillprovidealldiagramsinConceptDrawformatandincorporategeographicinformationintoGoogleEarthandESRIformatsforusebyMountDoraandincorporationintotheclient’sGISsystem.
Page 18 of 75
15
Task8:CommunicationsandTechnologyOperationsPlanTheoperationsplanfortheDistrictmustprovideefficientandcosteffectiveO&Mforthecommunicationsandtechnologyinfrastructure. Itwill detailmanagement level strategies on structuring the operations andmanaging personnel andsystem resources. It is possible for these operational roles to be pushed onto a P3 partner given the appropriatebroadbandbusinessmodel.Areasoftheoperationsplaninclude:
• BSS/OSS• Provisioning• Capacitymanagement• Orderfulfillment
• Servicelevelmanagement• Contactandescalation• Projectmanagement• Resourceutilization
Task9:CommunicationsandTechnologyFinancialPlan
ThefinancialplanwillprovideextensivefinancialmodelingofthevariousbusinessmodelstoallowMountDoratounderstandtheperformanceofdifferentoptionsforbuildingandoperatingacommunicationsandtechnologyutility. ItwillallowMountDoratomake informeddecisionsabout ifandhowto invest insuchautilityunderowner/operator,leaseholdandhybridmodels.Wewillexplorethefinancialimpactsofusingclosed-accessversusopen-accessnetworksandhoweachofthesewillimpactthecommunityandfinancialoutcomesoftheproject.Inourfinancialmodels,weprovideallfinancialcomponentsrelatedtothecommunicationsandtechnologyutilityusinglong-rangeplanningtools(10-20year),includingafullsetofpro-formastatementsandfinancialanalysis.Financialsinclude:
• Pro-formafinancialstatements,includingbalancesheets,incomestatements,cash-flowstatementsandownerequitystatements
• Capitalandoperationalbudgets• Revenueandcostmodels• Customerforecasts
• Serviceforecasts• Debtfinancingandamortization
worksheets• Financialratioanalysis• Financingalternatives,debt,equityand
grants
Task10:LicensesandAgreementsThissectionwillprovidedetailedanalysisofbothStateandFederalregulatorystatutesconcerningcommunicationsandtechnologyutilities.MagellanstaffhasanextensivebackgroundinthetelecomregulatoryarenaandcanprovideguidancetoMountDoraonthesematters,helpingtoensurecompliancewithStateandFederallaws,includingcompliancewiththeFCC,USAC,DepartmentofRevenueandPublicServiceCommission.Inthissection,wewillalsoprovideasetofcoreservicedocumentsthatwillberequiredforoperatingthecommunicationsandtechnologyutility,includingacoresetofagreementsandcontractsforservices.Theseinclude:
• BroadbandServicesAgreements• MasterServiceAgreements• ServiceLevelAgreements
• AcceptableUsePolicies• Easement/RightofEntryAgreements• OtherDocumentsasNeeded
Page 19 of 75
16
ProjectDeliverablesAlldocumentsfortheprojectwillbedeliveredinpaperandelectroniccopy.Thedeliverablesforthisprojectinclude:
1. TheWolfBranchInnovationDistrictICTMasterPlan;2. Financialmodeloutputs;3. Marketingmaterial, languageandbrochures tobeused inprintandwebadvertising theDistrictas a “Smart
Community;”4. Attachedsetsofconceptualengineeringdiagramsanddesignsprovidingtechnicaldesignofthesystem(s);5. AttachedmapspresentedinGoogleEarthprovidingGIS-enableddesignandoverviewofthesystem;6. Managementlevelpresentationsonthestatusoftheprojectandsubjectareas;7. Periodicupdatemeetingsthroughoutthetermoftheproject;8. Aforward-lookingdocumenttodeterminethenextstepsafterprojectcompletion;and,9. Theprojectwillnotincludefinaldesignengineeringplans.
ProjectTimelineBased on the sizeof and scopeof the StrategicPlan,we estimate theproject tobe completed in fivemonths.Ourconsulting teamsareable tobegin thisprojectasearlyas July15,2018.Thechartbelow illustrates the timelineandmilestonesformainthecomponentsoftheproject.
Weestimatethatoverthefive-monthdurationoftheproject,approximatelytwodaysonsiteeachmonthwillberequiredfor successful completion of the project. During this time, Magellan will meet with City staff, hold meetings withstakeholders,andperformsitevisits. Inaddition,ourteamwillmakepresentationstoMountDoraprojectteamsandstaff, as well as other activities to be determined between the City and Magellan. Schedules will be determinedcooperativelybetween theCityandMagellan.MagellanwillrequireCityresources togatherrelevantprojectdata, toconductinterviewswithCitystaff,andtoparticipateonstatuscalls,onsitemeetings,andanyfinalpresentations.
888 960 5299 g1g @magellan-adv1sors com Page 20 of 75
17
DescriptionMonthà
1 2 3 4 5 6
Assessments• NeedsAnalysis• InfrastructureReview• CommunityVisioning
BusinessPlanning• BusinessDevelopment• BusinessModelAnalysis• SWOTAnalysis• RiskAnalysis• StrategicPlanning
TechnicalPlanning• Outside/InsidePlant• TechnologyIdentification• BaselineRouting• FacilityRequirements• Topology• NetworkDesign• Engineering
OperationalPlanning• BSS/OSS• ServiceLevelAgreements• BusinessDocuments• NetworkManagement• OperationsManagement
FinancialPlanning• Pro-FormaFinancials• CostModeling• Capex/Opex• FinancialAnalysis• Cost-BenefitAnalysis• TCO/ROI
PresentPlantoCityLeadership
Page 21 of 75
18
CostProposalMagellanAdvisorswillbillinmonthlyinstallmentsastheengagementisexecuted.Magellanwillbillonthefirstdayofthemonth.Travelandincidentalexpenseswillbebilledasincurred,witha10%administrativefee.Magellan’sperdiemrateformealsis$65perdayforfullworkdays.Invoicesarepayablenet30termsfromthedateofinvoice.Thetotalcostoftheprojectis$37,500andincludesallworktobecompletedbyMagellanforMountDoraasstatedinthisProposaloverthe5-monthtimeframe. Magellan’shourlyrateforthisplanningengagement is$150perhour,inaccordancewiththeCityofClermont’s2017CSA,Telecommunications/BroadbandPlanninghourlyrate.
Item FixedPrice
ICTMasterPlan(250hoursestimated) $37,500
ClientResponsibilitiesThefollowingclientresponsibilitieshelpensurethatthemasterplanningprojectisexecutedonscheduleandwithminimaldelays.
• ProvideadequatestaffresourcestoMagellanpersonnelworkingontheproject;• Ensure thatMountDora staffworkingwithMagellanhave suitable knowledgeabout the subjectmatterand
understandtheproject;• ProvideadequateinformationtoMagellanpersonnel,including,butnotlimitedtothefollowingdata:
o Maps of the Wolf Branch area, including key areas of the planned development, residential units,commercialunits,anchors,roads,utilitiesandotherkeyplannedinfrastructure;
• Provide adequate physical access to Magellan personnel for site visits to facilities, outside/inside plantinfrastructureandotherclientownedoroperatedareas;and,
• ProcessanychangestotheengagementorscopeofworkbetweenMagellanandMountDora,intimelyfashion.
Page 22 of 75
19
Signature&AcceptanceSignatureofthisProposalbytheClientwarrantsthatallcomponentsofthisProposalareacceptabletotheCityofMountDoraandthattheperson(s)signingthisProposalhastheright,powerandauthoritytoexecutetheProposal.
MagellanAdvisors,LLCAFloridaLimitedLiabilityCompany99918thStreet,Suite3000Denver,CO80202
CityofMountDora,FL
PrintName:CourtneyS.Violette PrintName:
Title:COO Title:Signature: Signature:
Date:June25,2018 Date:
Page 23 of 75
September 21, 2018
Johnna Shamblin, CCIO Information Technology Manager City of Mount Dora P.O. Box 176 Mount Dora, FL 32756‐0176
Via email: [email protected]
Subject: Proposal to develop a fiber business plan for the Wolf Branch Innovation District
Dear Johnna:
I enjoyed meeting with you earlier this month and learning about your plans for the Wolf Branch Innovation District. As we discussed, CTC Technology & Energy (CTC) is pleased to present this proposal to support the City with fiber business planning. I have also included background information regarding our decades of experience working for local governments on broadband strategy, broadband business planning, and network engineering.
As a matter of philosophy, CTC is a public interest‐focused consultancy. We work exclusively for public, cooperative, and other non‐profit entities and have no financial relationships with equipment manufacturers, construction companies, or systems integrators. We will be your independent, objective adviser—and will be guided by your goals, priorities, and risk tolerance.
Our recommendations and insights are based on each individual client’s needs, objectives, and
market situation. We perform custom research and analysis for each client—and, as a result, limit our engagements to ensure that each client receives our full attention.
Please do not hesitate to contact me with questions or comments about our proposal. We look forward to the opportunity to work with you and your colleagues on this important initiative.
Best Regards,
Tom Asp Principal Engineer and Analyst
ATTACHMENT #2
Page 24 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
ii
Contents1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1
2. Statement of Work ................................................................................................................. 2
Task 1: Strategic Analysis – Facilitate an on‐site project kick‐off and strategy workshop ......... 3
Task 2: Network Design and Cost Estimate ................................................................................ 4
Network Design ....................................................................................................................... 4
Cost Estimate .......................................................................................................................... 5
Task 3: Market Sounding – Conduct teleconferences with potential business customers and providers ..................................................................................................................................... 5
Task 4: Business Modeling and Financial Analysis ...................................................................... 6
Analyze Fiber Network Business Model ................................................................................. 6
Develop Financial Model ........................................................................................................ 7
Task 5: Comprehensive Report ................................................................................................... 8
3. Project Fees ............................................................................................................................. 9
4. CTC’s Qualifications............................................................................................................... 10
Experience and Expertise .......................................................................................................... 10
Thought Leadership .................................................................................................................. 10
Commitment to Meeting Our Clients’ Needs ........................................................................... 11
5. Key Team Members .............................................................................................................. 12
6. Demonstrated Experience – Project Descriptions ................................................................ 14
City of Atlanta ....................................................................................................................... 14
City of Bloomington, Indiana ................................................................................................ 15
City of Boston ........................................................................................................................ 15
Garrett County, Maryland ..................................................................................................... 16
Town of Holly Springs, North Carolina .................................................................................. 16
City of Huntsville, Alabama ................................................................................................... 17
City of Lexington, Kentucky .................................................................................................. 17
City of Madison, Wisconsin ................................................................................................... 17
City of Ocala, Florida ............................................................................................................. 17
Page 25 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
iii
City of Palo Alto, California ................................................................................................... 18
City and County of San Francisco .......................................................................................... 19
City of Seattle and Seattle City Light ..................................................................................... 19
Cities of Urbana and Champaign / University of Illinois (UC2B Network) ............................ 20
City of Westminster, Maryland ............................................................................................. 21
7. References ............................................................................................................................ 23
Appendix A: CTC Staff Resumes .................................................................................................... 24
Joanne S. Hovis, Esq. | President and Director of Business Consulting ................................... 24
Andrew Afflerbach, Ph.D., P.E. | CEO and Chief Technology Officer ....................................... 28
Thomas J. Asp, BSEE, MBA | Principal Engineer and Analyst ................................................... 33
Matthew DeHaven | Principal Engineer and Project Manager ................................................ 37
Eric Wirth | Senior Project Engineer ......................................................................................... 41
Page 26 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
1
1. IntroductionCTC is an established national consulting firm that offers a unique combination of qualifications and capabilities in broadband financial analysis, business planning, engineering, and network strategic planning. Founded in 1983, we have extensive experience providing independent financial, strategic, and technical, guidance for public and non‐profit communications efforts, including those of state and local governments, non‐profit consortia, universities, and cooperative and municipal utilities.
CTC is a highly respected firm with considerable experience and intellectual resources. Our reputation rests on our track record of providing independent, objective, and unbiased guidance. For more than three decades, we have served the non‐profit and public sectors in evaluating broadband deployment efforts and in bringing an independent, sometimes critical, eye to communications efforts.
We are in an industry that is
changing by the day with
respect to regulatory
frameworks, technology, and
potential business models.
What distinguishes CTC is that
we perform custom analysis
for every client, developing
new strategies for leveraging
public and private sector
investment to enable
sustainable last‐mile
connectivity.
Page 27 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
2
2. StatementofWorkCTC will work with the City to develop a comprehensive financial model, business strategy, and public‐private partnership strategy for the City’s planned dark fiber assets and colocation facilities. The following is a summary of the tasks we propose to undertake:
1. Based on our experience designing middle‐mile dark fiber networks to meet defined needs, we will develop prepare a system‐level design and cost estimate for a dark fiber backbone and colocation facilities.
2. We will develop a framework business structure designed to secure the City’s public policy goals for broadband while mitigating its risk through collaboration with the private sector.
3. We will develop a full financial model for the City’s fiber operations so that City leadership can understand the financial ramifications of the dark fiber effort. Our 20‐year financial analysis will project how much revenue the City will require to achieve positive ongoing cash flow. We will analyze both a base case and a range of different scenarios to illustrate the model’s sensitivities and risks.
4. To test the viability of the revenue requirements, we will conduct a series of targeted conversations with potential partners to ascertain interest in leasing City‐owned fiber along existing or planned routes. These conversations will enable determination of the viability of the effort and will help the City understand its financial risks before it commits to expanding its middle‐mile fiber.
CTC will be the City’s independent adviser. As a matter of policy, we have no financial stake in the City’s decisions; we do not seek to construct or operate the City’s network.
Our project approach involves methodical research, rigorous analysis, and regular communication, and is structured as follows:
Task 1: Strategic workshop and determination of parameters and goals
Task 2: Network design and cost estimate (develop high‐level design to support business modeling)
Task 3: Market sounding (seek to identify partner interest)
Task 4: Business modeling and financial analysis (refine approach and explore options for public–private partnerships)
Task 5: Comprehensive report (develop analysis and recommendations)
Page 28 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
3
Each of these tasks is described in more detail below.
Task 1: Strategic Analysis – Facilitate an on‐site project kick‐off and strategyworkshopAs a preliminary step, we will conduct an on‐site strategy session. Our project leader will meet with City personnel and invited stakeholders to discuss project goals and objectives, review
relevant maps and documents, establish project parameters, and address the project team’s primary questions and concerns.
Our goal in this task will be to develop a full understanding of the City’s planned middle‐mile dark fiber and colocation facilities (including the location of the colocation facilities). The insights we gather will inform the development of a series of tentative business model options based on the City’s strategy and fiber design, as well as our further analysis and recommendations.
In particular, we will look at potential configurations for public‐private collaboration, such as whether to grant a single entity an exclusive right to dark fiber on the condition that it offer open access at the lit service layer—and at pricing that is calculated to enable other entities to enter the market. This is the approach we negotiated with KINBER and Sunesys (now Crown Castle) for the statewide network in Pennsylvania.
We also view the strategy session as an opportunity to present an overview of relevant case studies and best practices in public sector broadband, and to discuss funding, financing, and partnership issues.
Specific agenda items will include:
• Introduce team
• Identify project stakeholders and roles, particularly among City staff
• Review project schedule, key milestones, and deliverables
Provide a briefing on public sector fiber networks elsewhere in the United States, based on our experience with these projects and the existing and emerging business/financial models under which they operate
Ascertain the potential range of users and related capacity requirements for the City’s existing and planned infrastructure
• Share relevant maps, studies, and documents
• Discuss potential City roles in network deployment and operations
Page 29 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
4
• Discuss potential risks and benefits related to fiber construction
• Discuss potential revenue streams possible with fiber deployment
• Discuss potential partnership approaches
Task2:NetworkDesignandCostEstimateWe understand that the City’s planned fiber deployment model includes:
1. Constructing middle‐mile fiber to the Wolf Branch Innovation District
2. Building at least two colocation facilities (i.e., caged racks and power)
3. Constructing fiber from the colocation facilities to each multi‐dwelling unit (MDU) and into each defined neighborhood for future residential service to single‐family units (SFU)
4. Leasing dark fiber and colocation space to private entities that would then add electronics, deploy in‐building infrastructure (MDUs) and last‐mile residential infrastructure (SFU), and deliver retail services to residents and businesses
To support this vision, CTC’s engineers will prepare a system‐level design and cost estimate for a dark fiber backbone and colocation facilities. The design will seek to cost‐effectively connect key sites identified by the City (potentially including government facilities, anchor institutions, and public safety entities), and to support future last‐mile deployment and services to economic development target areas, MDUs, and last‐mile SFU residential deployment.
To be clear, we will not be providing a blueprint‐level network design or cost estimate. Rather, we will be providing a conceptual design, high‐level maps, and a system‐level overview of the potential infrastructure—which in turn will become a roadmap for financial analysis and business modeling, and for future decisions (potentially including detailed engineering).
NetworkDesignAs an initial step, we will review City‐provided GIS data and other relevant maps, studies, documents, or data that the City can share with us during the strategic workshop (including the location of the planned colocation facilities). A CTC outside plant engineer will then conduct an extensive desk survey using the City’s GIS maps, Google Earth imagery, and other sources.
We will include in our engineering analysis existing public infrastructure (including utility poles, fiber, and conduit, but also rights‐of‐way access and locations for network hubs and other necessary infrastructure) that we believe the City can use to support deployment.
Page 30 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
5
CostEstimateCTC will prepare cost estimates and supporting documentation for fiber deployment and the implementation of the colocation facilities, inclusive of anticipated construction labor, materials, engineering, permitting, pole attachment licensing, quality control, and testing.
Supporting documentation will include summary tables of key project metrics generated for cost estimation purposes, including estimated fiber plant mileage and anticipated percentages of aerial versus underground construction. Additionally, CTC will provide a narrative to explain key construction characteristics that impact the cost estimates.
Our intent is that the cost estimates will allow the City to inform future cost estimates for detailed engineering of specific phases, as well as to properly scope construction phases according to particular budgetary constraints.
As is typical in this phase of a fiber construction project, the cost estimates will not be based on a detailed design, environmental assessment, or geotechnical analysis of soil composition. As a result, actual costs may vary due to unknown factors, including: 1) costs of private easements, 2) utility pole replacement and make ready costs, and 3) subsurface hard rock. We will, of course, incorporate suitable assumptions to address these items based on our experience.
Task 3: Market Sounding – Conduct teleconferences with potential businesscustomersandprovidersWe recommend reaching out individually to vetted stakeholders—in this case, businesses located in or near the Wolf Branch Innovation District that might be potential dark fiber customers or potential partners—to seek to develop quantitative and qualitative data and insights into their likely interest in the City’s dark fiber. We will facilitate up to eight one‐on‐one teleconferences with businesses identified by the City.
We will also seek to speak directly to a small sample of “alternative” service providers, which in our experience are generally more interested in learning about municipal dark fiber lease opportunities than are the traditional service providers. We will identify these contacts.
In this task, we will draw on the insights we develop in project strategy discussions with the City, as well as our extensive experience soliciting industry and customer input related to dark fiber leasing and public sector broadband partnerships. We will be prepared to outline the City’s current state and future goals, and to effectively communicate the City’s range of interests.
Our goal will be to develop an understanding of whether and to what extent there may be a market for City‐built and operated dark fiber—and whether the City might reasonably be able to
Page 31 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
6
secure a long‐term commitment from a private partner that would maximize the potential of that infrastructure while minimizing the City’s risk.
Task4:BusinessModelingandFinancialAnalysisBased on our analysis of the input we may receive as a result of direct outreach to potential partners, we will develop and refine a recommended business model to reflect the identified demand for the City’s dark fiber.
Our analysis will consider a range of business models—with a focus on public‐private partnerships (P3)—that might support the City’s next steps. Our analysis will reflect our understanding of the City’s desired roles and risk tolerances.
As we have done for public sector broadband networks nationwide, we will develop a financial model (pro forma data) for the City’s fiber network operations based on the existing system‐level design and related cost estimates.
These financial projections will also include a risk assessment. We will identify requirements (e.g., financial, staffing, business and technical expertise needed) and evaluate factors that would be affected by the business model.
AnalyzeFiberNetworkBusinessModelWe will bring to this engagement our experience in identifying the challenges of public sector network operations and expansion—and our realistic approach to assessing project risks. We will be very frank about the level of funding needed for various levels of network expansion, and about the trade‐offs among risk, benefits, and network control in various partnership approaches.
Notably, we have singular experience in developing broadband public–private partnerships on behalf of public sector clients. For both the Town of Holly Springs, North Carolina, and the City of Westminster, Maryland, we assisted the municipal governments in identifying a private partner to assume operating risk in providing services to the public under two significantly different partnership models, each aligned with the unique needs of these communities. We are also providing broadband P3 strategic and technical consulting to the cities of Baton Rouge, La.; Boulder, Colo.; Huntsville, Ala., and Madison, Wis.
We will assess and provide guidance on variations on this business model that might support the City’s next steps and inform an implementation roadmap. We will consider the strategies we believe are relevant to the City’s desired role and its risk tolerance.
Page 32 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
7
DevelopFinancialModelBased on our consideration of potential partnership approaches and demand for dark fiber leases and colocation space, we will next develop a business case and financial analysis model for use of the City’s dark fiber and colocation facilities. The high‐level financial model for the City’s proposed infrastructure will take into account a range of likely costs, including:
• Capital investment and additional assets required • Financing • Operations, maintenance, and repair
We will outline operational attributes and processes including policies, staffing levels, maintenance agreements, and other considerations. Particular attention will be paid to financing and funding sources and approaches, as well as operating requirements and working capital projections. We will discuss a strategy for fiber maintenance and management based on best practices.
The pro forma will follow accounting standards and will provide schedules that detail:
Operating income and cash flow Net present value analysis Lease revenue Debt service analysis and reserve fund requirements Uses and sources of funds Operating expenses and savings Depreciation summary Projected construction costs for network, hardware, buildings, and other equipment Return on investment (ROI)
Our assumptions and price sensitivities (particularly around dark fiber and colocation leases) will be clearly stated and justified. This financial model will provide the City with an order‐of‐magnitude estimate of overall costs (i.e., construction, operations), and will support a phased implementation roadmap by providing inputs for potential business models, financing options, and partnering opportunities.
As our references can attest, our financial analyses are based on reasonable assumptions regarding potential costs (capital and operating) and revenue, and are extremely detailed in terms of taking into consideration the financial implications of staffing, maintenance contracts, and so on.
In addition to our narrative report, we will provide the City with a detailed Excel workbook that includes underlying data and assumptions, and can be manipulated to illustrate the impact of changing costs or revenue on the network’s potential income statement.
Page 33 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
8
Task5:ComprehensiveReportOur final deliverable will be a comprehensive report that recommends a strategic approach and a roadmap of actions for the City’s consideration. We will evaluate the benefits, risks, and implications of the City’s options in light of the financial analysis. The report will include the data, maps, insights, and recommendations developed in the previous tasks.
We will provide the City with an electronic draft of our report, which will include an executive summary and a narrative supported by tables, graphics, and GIS‐compatible maps as appropriate.
We will be available to discuss the report with City staff via teleconference, will incorporate feedback from reviewers, and will deliver an electronic version of the final report.
Page 34 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
9
3. ProjectFeesCTC proposes to perform the professional services described in the scope of work above for the not‐to‐exceed cost of $35,000, including travel. We will bill our work at the following hourly rates:
Labor Category Rate
Chief Technology Officer $175 Director of Business Consulting $175 Principal Analyst / Engineer $165 Senior Project Analyst / Engineer $155 Senior Analyst / Engineer $145 Staff Analyst / Engineer $135 Communications Aide / Engineer Aide $80
Local travel is billed at current standard mileage rates. Non‐routine expenses and long‐distance travel are recovered at direct cost with no mark‐up.
Page 35 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
10
4. CTC’sQualificationsExperienceandExpertiseCTC offers extensive experience and expertise in all aspects of strategic and business planning, feasibility studies, needs assessment, and network engineering. We have developed broadband business strategy—including market surveys, business plans, engineering analyses, and financial pro formas—for public sector clients nationwide, including the cities of Atlanta, Palo Alto, Raleigh, San Francisco, Santa Cruz, and Seattle.
Many of our engagements have focused on low‐risk non‐profit and public sector strategies to expand existing broadband infrastructure to close the digital divide, promote economic development, enhance the availability of high‐bandwidth services to local businesses, and increase broadband competition.
We specialize in helping local governments and municipal utilities develop phased approaches for implementing fiber networks to meet their needs; we are particularly experienced with helping to develop strategies for risk sharing among multiple partners, including, in some cases, for‐profit service providers that utilize publicly owned assets. Our goal in these engagements is to develop strategies in which the service provider partner shares the risk of expanding a network to serve the public sector’s broader needs. In these engagements, too, we are vigilant about protecting our public sector clients’ interests, and managing their risk with respect to partner financing and operations.
ThoughtLeadershipWe are also thought leaders in the range of business and technical issues around non‐profit and public sector broadband deployment. CTC principals Joanne Hovis and Andrew Afflerbach authored “Gigabit Communities,” an independent white paper on gigabit‐facilitation strategies commissioned by Google.1 Ms. Hovis co‐authored “The Emerging World of Broadband Public–Private Partnerships: A Business Strategy and Legal Guide” (published by the Benton Foundation).2
Ms. Hovis has testified multiple times before committees of the United States Congress on topics regarding the economics of broadband deployment, particularly in rural areas. Most recently, she presented testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives’ Committee on Energy and
1 See www.Gigabit‐Communities.com. This work was supported by Google in furtherance of CTC’s broadband advocacy mission. Under the terms of the relationship with Google, CTC’s analysis was entirely independent and focused on promoting public sector and non‐profit needs, rather than those of Google or any other network deployer. We are proud of our strong working relationship with Google Fiber, but maintain independence as part of our mission to serve non‐profit and public sector clients. 2 https://www.benton.org/sites/default/files/partnerships.pdf
Page 36 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
11
Commerce, Subcommittee on Communications and Technology, on “Broadband: Deploying America’s 21st Century Infrastructure.”3
Ms. Hovis and Dr. Afflerbach co‐authored, with the New America Foundation’s Open Technology Institute, a report on local broadband networks: “The Art of the Possible: An Overview of Public Broadband Options.”4 That study was cited in the White House report on municipal fiber networks, “Community‐based Broadband Solutions: The Benefits of Competition and Choice for Community Development and High Speed Internet Access.”5
Dr. Afflerbach’s study on the likely deployment costs of building fiber optics to every school and library in the nation was cited and relied upon by the FCC in its E‐rate modernization order of 2015.
Ms. Hovis, Dr. Afflerbach, and other CTC staff have also authored guides on community fiber development for the Utilities Telecommunications Council, and the Tennessee Valley Public Power Association. These and other key documents are available in the library on our website.6
CommitmenttoMeetingOurClients’NeedsWe have a robust roster of national and international clients, and our workload reflects that success. As we have proven over the past three decades, however, we are adept at managing our clients’ needs and our staffing levels. We pride ourselves on our track record of completing projects on time, regardless of the size or complexity of the tasks at hand. We commit to providing an exceptional level of service and to meeting your timeline.
Engaging with CTC means receiving customized analysis and the level of time, consideration, and care required to provide you with the answers you need. This level of service is complemented by our proven ability to communicate our findings and recommendations—in high‐quality written reports and engaging in‐person presentations—to decision‐makers, elected officials, citizens, and other interested project stakeholders.
3 http://www.ctcnet.us/blog/ctc‐president‐joanne‐hovis‐testifies‐before‐u‐s‐house‐subcommittee‐broadband‐deploying‐americas‐21st‐century‐infrastructure/ 4 http://www.ctcnet.us/publications/the‐art‐of‐possible‐an‐overview‐of‐public‐broadband‐options/ 5http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/community‐based_broadband_report_by_executive_office_of_the_president.pdf 6 www.CTCnet.us/library
Page 37 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
12
5. KeyTeamMembersCTC has a team of 37 engineers, analysts, GIS specialists, technical writers, technicians, and support staff. The following are brief descriptions of a sample of our project team; resumes for each are attached in Appendix A below, and additional staff resumes are available on request.
Tom Asp, MBA, Principal Engineer and Analyst, will be the project manager and will lead the business analysis and financial planning tasks. He is regarded as one of the premier analysts in the United States in the field of municipal planning and deployment of broadband systems to meet economic development, digital inclusion, and other needs. Mr. Asp has more than 25 years of nationwide experience as an engineer and analyst in communications and public power systems. His experience includes telecommunication system design and evaluation of network feasibility. Mr. Asp has developed financial statements and prepared quantitative business plan analyses for numerous municipal and utility clients nationwide and is widely recognized as an expert in municipal broadband business and strategic planning. Mr. Asp has served as lead for more than 100 local government broadband projects during his career—both with CTC and, previously, as a partner at the public accounting firm Baker Tilley—and brings a wealth of practical fiber optic business planning experience to his projects.
Joanne Hovis, CTC’s President and Director of Business Consulting, will be the senior project adviser and will oversee all strategic and business planning tasks. An attorney who has provided network business model analysis and recommendations for some of the largest non‐profit and public broadband networks in the country, she is a recognized authority on the broadband market and community broadband topics—and on the evolving role of government in the provision of communications services to the public. She has testified multiple times before congressional committees regarding broadband policy matters. She has extensive experience developing business case and business model scenarios for non‐profit and public sector broadband initiatives. She leads the CTC team that advises the states of Connecticut, New
Mexico, Kentucky, Massachusetts, and Kansas, the cities of San Francisco, Seattle, and Washington, D.C., and the statewide broadband networks in Colorado, Maryland, and Pennsylvania.
Andrew Afflerbach, Ph.D., P.E., CTC’s Chief Technology Officer, will be senior technical project adviser and will oversee all technical research and analysis. Dr. Afflerbach served as technical adviser to the government of New Zealand in its nationwide FTTP initiative, where he developed the reference architecture for the effort and led the specification and procurement strategy. He has planned and specified fiber optic and wireless networks for large cities, counties, and regions, and conceived and developed the super‐regional interoperable fiber optic network in the National Capital Region (including the District of Columbia, Maryland, Virginia, and 22 large local communities). He is an experienced network planner who understands the business and financial
Page 38 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
13
implications of various network designs. He also leads the technical team conducting FirstNet planning for the District of Columbia. Dr. Afflerbach serves as a member of SAFECOM and is a licensed Professional Engineer.
Matthew DeHaven, Principal Engineer and Project Lead, has designed thousands of miles of OSP fiber networks in urban and rural geographies across 10 states. He is currently managing the deployment of an FTTP network in Westminster, Maryland. He previously served as the Portfolio Manager for the One Maryland Inter‐County Broadband Network; as the lead technical consultant on that project, he oversaw the use of approximately $100 million in grant and matching funds to build approximately 800 miles of fiber optics and directly connect approximately 650 community anchor institutions, including schools, libraries, government buildings, community colleges, and public safety agencies.
Eric Wirth, CTC Principal Engineer, has almost 15 years of communications engineering experience; he specializes in evaluating broadband (video, voice, and data) telecommunications networks, analyzing emerging broadband technologies, and designing broadband networks for institutional uses. In addition, Eric has developed fiber network designs and cost estimates for CTC clients including the cities of Atlanta, Boulder, Madison, and Palo Alto. He has an engineering degree from the University of Virginia.
Page 39 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
14
6. DemonstratedExperience–ProjectDescriptionsThe following project descriptions illustrate CTC’s demonstrated experience in network planning, engineering, business modeling, business planning, feasibility analysis, and financial planning. These are just a few of our hundreds of successful client engagements, supporting clients ranging
from small towns to large cities. Many additional project examples are available on request.
City of Atlanta
CTC currently is advising the City on strategic and tactical approaches it can take to plan, build, and operate a citywide backbone fiber network to cost‐effectively serve its internal needs, and enable competition and improved services in the City’s residential and business broadband markets.
Notably, we are guiding the City in its ongoing discussions with Google Fiber, Verizon, AT&T, and other telecommunications providers about options for joint builds and other potential partnership approaches. Our support includes technical, financial, and strategic planning expertise.
In the beginning phases of this long‐term engagement, we evaluated the City’s existing network infrastructure and designed the fiber component of its large‐scale buildout around traffic and Smart City communications—the first such deployment to support Smart City in the U.S. on this scale. In addition to our technical due diligence and project engineering, we facilitated discussions with the city’s range of stakeholders about their fiber and broadband needs, and coordinated with the private sector companies that are building or already operating networks in the City.
We have also developed RFIs and RFPs to serve a range of interrelated needs to further the City’s partner identification efforts. For example, we wrote an RFI to seek P3 opportunities and funding for Smart City infrastructure. And we wrote a second RFI to solicit interest and input for a P3 to build out wireless networks that would deliver free public Wi‐Fi and support Smart City communications within the downtown and major park areas, and in the Mayor’s designed corridors. We also developed an RFP for City fiber construction on the routes where the City is not obtaining fiber from private partners.
Page 40 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
15
City of Bloomington, Indiana
CTC is supporting the City’s efforts to develop ubiquitous, Gigabit‐class broadband. We collaborated with City staff and other stakeholders to facilitate a public symposium and related communications materials on the value of next‐generation infrastructure. We performed in‐depth analysis of the local broadband market, and fostered engagement with a range of public and private stakeholders. CTC’s analysts and engineers also assessed the City’s existing assets, prepared a competitive assessment of broadband services, benchmarked the City’s broadband availability, and developed high‐level engineering and cost estimates. Additionally, our team developed and administered an RFI to gauge public‐sector interest in partnering with the City to achieve its broadband goals.
City of Boston
CTC principals Joanne Hovis and Andrew Afflerbach are assisting the City with strategic guidance in confidential negotiations with potential broadband service providers.
In a parallel engagement, CTC engineers and analysts are evaluating and providing recommendations related to the City’s range of strategic options for deploying fiber optics to connect its public schools and government facilities.
As part of our feasibility study, CTC’s business analysts and engineers reviewed the engineering that the City had already completed; evaluated the stakeholders’ previously identified needs and concerns; and analyzed both the City’s existing infrastructure assets and the general scope of the fiber network envisioned by the City.
We are now exploring a wide range of public and public–private options for maximizing the benefits of the City’s planned investment to get direct fiber connectivity to schools and government buildings.
We developed an RFI for the City to identify the fiber providers and potential providers in the public rights‐of‐way (PROW). We have led extensive discussions with middle mile and fiber‐to‐the‐tower (FTTT) carriers about their potential roles in working with the City.
Page 41 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
16
As one outcome of our work, we determined that the fiber construction costs in the City are sufficiently high that the City should use existing infrastructure as much as possible. Accordingly, CTC engineers reviewed fiber that had been installed through the City’s longstanding shadow
conduit policy, which obligated infrastructure companies to provide the City with fiber and conduit under their franchise and PROW agreements. We are preparing an RFP to establish partnerships that will enable the City to maximize use of existing construction and obtain dark fiber to schools and government buildings.
Garrett County, Maryland We helped the County with engineering, strategy, and business planning for expansion of middle‐mile fiber—then helped the County negotiate with a private partner to leverage that fiber to support the deployment of a fixed‐wireless broadband network. The TV White Spaces network will serve up to 3,000 currently unserved homes in the most remote parts of the County.
Town of Holly Springs, North Carolina
CTC conducted a broadband needs assessment and developed a strategic approach and return on investment (ROI) analysis for the town’s proposed fiber network implementation. Our team of project managers, outside plant engineers, and network engineers then designed and oversaw implementation of a middle‐mile fiber network serving the town’s community anchor institutions (e.g., schools and libraries) and major economic development partners. The first sites on the 19‐mile network went live in June 2014.
As in our engagement with the City of Westminster, we also assisted the town in identifying a private partner to assume operating risk in providing services to the public. Ting Internet will build an FTTP network using the town’s backbone infrastructure; the town announced its public–private partnership in 2015. For more details, see CTC’s website: http://www.ctcnet.us/blog/ctc‐helps‐position‐holly‐springs‐nc‐to‐attract‐big‐private‐fiber‐investment‐through‐smart‐infrastructure‐planning‐and‐best‐business‐practices/
Page 42 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
17
City of Huntsville, Alabama
CTC conducted broadband feasibility planning for the City and identified a range of options for models and approaches. We wrote the RFI through which the City launched its efforts to identify a private partner for citywide FTTP deployment. That process ultimately led to the City’s negotiations and agreement with Google Fiber—a partnership that follows the Westminster model. Huntsville Utilities will leverage its poles and infrastructure to construct its own FTTP citywide network with Google Fiber acting as anchor tenant on the network. For more details, see CTC’s website: http://goo.gl/i2jtZS.
City of Lexington, Kentucky
CTC prepared a high‐level fiber‐to‐the‐premises (FTTP) network design and cost estimate for the Lexington‐Fayette Urban County Government in Kentucky. CTC currently is helping the City negotiate a potential broadband public–private partnership.
City of Madison, Wisconsin
CTC wrote a fiber‐to‐the‐premises (FTTP) feasibility study for the City in mid‐2016.7 Over the course of the engagement, CTC engineers and analysts inventoried the City’s key physical infrastructure, including the Metropolitan Unified Fiber Network (MUFN); conducted interviews with representatives of City departments and stakeholders; researched the region’s available broadband services and costs; evaluated potential public–private partnership business models; and developed pro forma financial statements for a City‐owned fiber network. In addition to those tasks, CTC conducted residential market research to supplement the report’s findings, and to help gauge the community’s interest in broadband.
City of Ocala, Florida
CTC led a feasibility study of the City of Ocala’s fiber‐optic enterprise. We explored the potential range of business models and services that the city could implement to leverage its existing fiber‐optic network and staff skill sets. We performed a competitive assessment of existing private sector broadband services and conducted market research with statistically significant surveys of the local commercial and residential sectors to assess current and future demand for high‐speed
7 http://www.ctcnet.us/news/city‐of‐madison‐releases‐ctc‐report/
Page 43 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
18
connectivity. We then proposed logical expansion strategies derived from in‐depth analysis of financial costs, business models, and potential benefits to the community of multiple options.
City of Palo Alto, California
CTC has a multi‐decade relationship with the City of Palo Alto and Palo Alto Utilities. In two parallel projects in 2015, for example, CTC developed both a fiber‐to‐the‐premises (FTTP) master plan and a wireless network plan for the City. In the fiber realm, CTC determined the extent to which the City’s infrastructure could be used to enable FTTP buildout. We developed a full FTTP feasibility study for a range of potential business models, including public, private, and P3. In the wireless engagement, CTC conducted a system‐level requirements analysis and a needs assessment, and recommended wireless technologies, network designs, and business models.
CTC previously provided strategic guidance and advice to the City on expanding its dark fiber network to create opportunities for enhanced utility, municipal, and commercial services. We assessed how to leverage existing infrastructure to promote commercial wireless broadband deployment and improve municipal Smart Grid and public safety technologies. We also prepared a framework for establishing a public‐private partnership to encourage greater infrastructure deployment.
CTC engineers are also currently developing a “dig once” ordinance and related processes for the City.
City of Pharr, Texas
CTC has collaborated with the City since 2016—developing a broadband strategic plan that includes business planning and engineering guidance. Following a workshop with the City and its key stakeholders to establish a strategic direction, CTC’s engineers and analysts have assessed the City’s broadband infrastructure and market; evaluated current and future demand for broadband; analyzed potential federal and regional funding mechanisms for fiber deployment;
Page 44 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
19
and explored options for the City to engage with the private sector on a potential partnership to expand the City’s broadband infrastructure.
City and County of San Francisco
CTC kicked off a major broadband strategic planning project with the City in February 2017. We are providing strategic, financial, and technical advisory services as part of a broad effort to analyze the City’s broadband options.
CTC also recently developed technical specifications for a municipal “dig once” policy to facilitate the cost‐effective expansion of broadband infrastructure throughout the City.
We previously prepared a series of path‐breaking analyses of the feasibility of the City building and operating a fiber‐to‐the‐premises (FTTP) network—including a system design and detailed analysis of candidate architectures and open access models. The project also included analysis of multiple business models and business recommendations customized for San Francisco’s unique circumstances.
In another strategic initiative, CTC assisted the City in developing and evaluating options for backhaul to serve City‐operated Wi‐Fi service to the public and to residents of public housing.
CTC also provided ongoing consulting and strategic guidance with respect to an FTTP pilot and related technology projects, and helped the City with business planning, financial analysis, and engineering design to support its preparation of an extensive application for federal grant funding.
City of Santa Cruz, California
CTC supported the development of the City’s broadband public–private partnership with systems‐level engineering, cost estimation, market data analysis, financial modeling, and business model development. For more details on our engagement and the City’s plans, see: https://goo.gl/zPEIde
City of Seattle and Seattle City Light
As consultant to Seattle City Light and the City itself, CTC has delivered business, technical, and strategic guidance and explored options for FTTP network deployment in light of its changing local marketplace and the emergence of new business models.
Page 45 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
20
In our current engagement, CTC is developing a strategic plan that will recommend technical approaches to filling broadband gaps (e.g., in underserved neighborhoods) and a sustainable business model for deployment. CTC is engaging various stakeholders and agencies on the City’s behalf, and conducting outreach to private sector entities—including internet service providers and wireless carriers—through an RFI process. CTC’s engineers and analysts will evaluate the potential for P3s, examine the feasibility of using the City’s fiber to support Wi‐Fi, and provide a high‐level financial and technical approach to fill the City’s broadband gaps.
This engagement follows on multiple significant projects we have completed with the City and its electric utility over more than eight years. In 2015, we completed a major FTTP feasibility study (http://www.seattle.gov/tech/initiatives/broadband/studies‐and‐history) that included residential and business market research, financial projections for multiple buildout approaches, and a risk assessment.
CTC has previously performed market research and developed a feasibility study, a business case analysis, and an “off‐the‐balance‐sheet” benefits analysis for a proposed citywide FTTP network.
The first study, “FTTP Municipal Broadband Risks and Benefits Evaluation,” included an internal needs analysis, market research of both residential and business customers; an assessment of competing services and technologies; and an evaluation of the business case and business risks.
Following on that report, CTC researched and wrote an “FTTP Benefits Evaluation,” which explored the benefits of FTTP beyond the traditional balance sheet, including cost avoidance, monetary savings, and environmental impact. Notably, this report was one of the first of its kind to qualify and quantify (where possible) community‐wide benefits of ubiquitous broadband connectivity such as enabling increased telecommuting, reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, and positive impacts on vulnerable populations such as the elderly and low‐income residents.
In the third phase of the project, CTC advised the Mayor of Seattle regarding the U.S. communications market and business planning strategies for a citywide fiber enterprise. CTC led and facilitated a business planning working group comprised of the Mayor’s senior staff, the directors of the City’s electric and water/sewer utilities, and the City’s Chief Technology Officer.
Cities of Urbana and Champaign / University of Illinois (UC2B Network)
CTC has been the strategic and business planning consultant to Urbana, Champaign, and the university for more than seven years—since the coalition conceived of constructing a middle‐mile fiber network to connect community anchor institutions.
Page 46 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
21
Following construction of the middle‐mile fiber, we prepared a request for information (RFI) to enable the cities and the university to identify a private partner that would finance and operate an FTTP expansion of the network to serve 100 percent of the community. We evaluated potential partners’ proposals, then helped to negotiate with two partners to reduce the community’s risks and ensure that a partnership would achieve the coalition’s policy goals for digital inclusion.
As a result of the coalition’s final partnership, UC2B secured an open access Gigabit FTTP network buildout that, based on the negotiated agreement, would protect its public policy interest by providing the same opportunity for access to the entire community. In return, UC2B’s partner—the ISP and network operator iTV3—would have access to UC2B’s existing middle‐mile infrastructure (which iTV3 would operate) and the foundation of a significant last‐mile consumer network.
City of Westminster, Maryland
The Westminster model that CTC pioneered is the most influential broadband P3 in establishing the model of city‐owned fiber and private use of that fiber. This demand‐driven model was the first of its kind. (For more details, see CTC’s website: http://goo.gl/h14Lqi.)
The construction of the City’s FTTP network and its groundbreaking partnership are the culmination of a multi‐year engagement with CTC. CTC first prepared an FTTP feasibility study, cost estimate, and business case for the City in 2012 and 2013. Our report, which focused on maximizing available backbone network connectivity, included a technical design and cost estimates for two last‐mile FTTP pilot projects (one focused on residential customers, one focused on businesses).
Based on the strength of the City’s commitment to its principles, and the outcome of the feasibility analysis, the City decided to move forward with the small‐scale pilot projects. As that focused construction began, CTC continued to work closely with the City to establish its principles and risk tolerance, then designed a potential P3 model that would achieve a balance between those guiding forces. We established the City’s preferred role in each aspect of network construction and operations, developed criteria for evaluating potential partnerships, and develop a financial analysis tool to model a range of assumptions.
Based on these parameters, we then wrote an RFP to identify a private partner that would assume operating risk in providing services to the public over the City’s FTTP infrastructure. The RFP led to successful negotiations, led by CTC President Joanne Hovis, and the announcement of a first‐of‐a‐kind partnership with Ting Internet.
Page 47 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
22
CTC continues to support the 80‐mile FTTP deployment over a range of tasks spanning fiber infrastructure engineering, network design, construction bidding, construction oversight, and quality assurance inspection.
Page 48 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
23
7. ReferencesWe invite you to contact the following references about the quality, independence, and rigor of CTC’s work. Many additional references are available on request.
Town of Holly Springs, NC Mr. Jeff Wilson IT Director (919) 567‐4013, [email protected] City of Sturgis, MI Mr. John Griffith Superintendent Electric Department (269) 659‐7218, [email protected] Garrett County, Maryland Ms. Cheryl DeBerry Natural Resources Business Specialist Economic Development Department (301) 334‐6968, [email protected] City of Boulder, CO Mr. Chris Meschuk Assistant City Manager (303) 441‐4293, [email protected]
Page 49 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
24
AppendixA:CTCStaffResumesJoanneS.Hovis,Esq.|PresidentandDirectorofBusinessConsulting
Joanne Hovis is an attorney and business planner with a two‐decade background in communications and broadband. She is a nationally recognized authority on the broadband market and on the evolving role of public–private partnerships in the provision of communications services to the public.
Ms. Hovis leads the CTC team that advises the states of Connecticut, Kentucky, New Mexico, and New York; the cities of Atlanta, Boston, San Francisco, Seattle, and Washington, D.C.; and the statewide broadband networks in Colorado, Maryland, and Pennsylvania.
Ms. Hovis oversees all ongoing CTC research and analysis for local government clients and provides innovative business planning for communications networking initiatives such as San Francisco’s planned fiber network and the interoperable public safety communications network in the National Capital Region. She also leads CTC’s consulting on the federal E‐Rate and Healthcare Connect Fund programs.
Ms. Hovis is CEO of the Coalition for Local Internet Choice (CLIC) and a former president of the National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors (NATOA). She is a member of the boards of directors of the Benton Foundation and the Fiber Broadband Association.
Business Planning and Feasibility Analysis Ms. Hovis leads all of CTC’s business planning efforts. She has spearheaded projects that explore a range of business models by which government clients can leverage their existing assets to build, expand, and incentivize broadband expansion. She is sought nationwide as an expert in municipal ownership and operational broadband business models, fiber and wireless markets, and public–private partnerships. Among the projects she has led are:
City of Seattle. Ms. Hovis advised the Mayor of Seattle regarding the U.S. communications market and business planning strategies for a citywide enterprise. She reported the public subsidies a network would require, and delivered a full assessment of opportunities and risks. The report included internal needs analysis, statistically significant market research, an assessment of competing services and technologies, and an evaluation of the business case and financial risks. Ms. Hovis led further analysis of the benefits of FTTP beyond the traditional balance sheet, including cost avoidance, monetary savings, and environmental impact. She led and facilitated a business planning working group comprised of the Mayor’s senior staff, the directors of the city’s two utilities (electric and water/sewer), and the city’s CIO.
Ms. Hovis advises the State of New Mexico’s Department of Information Technology on broadband planning. She led a team of writers and analysts that produced a guidebook for New Mexico’s local governments to guide them through the business, financial, and strategic planning necessary to implement city‐ or county‐owned broadband networks. The book‐length guidebook offers specific instructions for localities to research and
Page 50 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
25
document the telecommunications infrastructure in their communities, and discusses strategies for exploring public–private partnerships for broadband expansion.
Ms. Hovis is working with the State of Kansas Department of Commerce on a large‐scale needs assessment of the state’s network infrastructure. She is conducting major market surveys among three core sectors across the state (residents, businesses, and community anchor institutions) to evaluate the current uses and needs of broadband infrastructure. She is also developing a strategy for the evolution of Kan‐ed, the state‐created broadband program that serves schools, hospitals, libraries, and higher education institutions.
Ms. Hovis has advised officials in the District of Columbia government on a range of telecommunications and fiber‐optic projects for almost a decade. She worked with the Office of the Chief Technology Officer (OCTO) to create a business plan and strategy for building a municipal fiber‐optic network with a wireless overlay in the least‐served wards of the city. She performed a business case and technology analysis (including five‐year projections) for DC‐Net, a fiber‐optic telecommunications network that provides voice and data services for the District of Columbia. She analyzed governmental, educational, and public safety uses of the network. The project tasks included asset mapping and network description; developing a cost comparison to leased/managed services; identifying opportunities to resell to other entities; identifying support mechanisms; and determining recommended business practices. She performs an ongoing role as strategic fiber adviser to the Chief Technology Officer and the Director of DC‐Net, and supports planning for the network’s future—including expanding the network to a broader array of end users.
Ms. Hovis advises the Urbana‐Champaign Big Broadband (UC2B) Coalition (University of Illinois and the cities of Champaign and Urbana) on a wide range of business and strategic planning issues. She is currently evaluating the private sector bids to build out last‐mile fiber connections in the cities. She took a leading role in preparing UC2B’s successful application for a federal Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) stimulus grant to support its proposed FTTP network.
Ms. Hovis provided extensive business planning, market assessment, and strategic planning for the City and County of San Francisco. Ms. Hovis served as a key adviser to the city’s Chief Information Officer. She conducted an independent evaluation of the feasibility of San Francisco constructing and operating a municipal FTTP network to serve businesses and residences. As a first step toward the FTTP network, she worked with the City to plan a migration of the leased telecommunications services connecting 250 government facilities to a City middle‐mile fiber‐optic network; she also supported the city’s application for BTOP funding. She reviewed cost and pricing factors associated with using leased telecommunications services and circuits provided by private vendors, as compared with migration to government‐owned fiber optics. She projected the return on investment and total cost of ownership (including a wide range of costs from deployment to staffing to maintenance to financing to cutover expenses). She evaluated potential efficiencies to be realized through in‐house rather than outsourced provision of services and circuits.
Ms. Hovis led a feasibility study of the City of Ocala, Florida’s fiber‐optic enterprise. She
Page 51 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
26
explored the potential range of business models and services that the city could implement to leverage its existing fiber‐optic network and staff skill sets. She performed a competitive assessment of existing private sector broadband services and conducted market research with statistically significant surveys of the local commercial and residential sectors to assess current and future demand for high‐speed connectivity. She proposed logical expansion strategies derived from in‐depth analysis of financial costs, business models, and potential benefits to the community of multiple options.
Ms. Hovis performed an expert assessment of the business and marketing plan for Utah’s inter‐jurisdictional network, UTOPIA. She led a strategy session with key stakeholders, collected relevant background material, performed an analysis of UTOPIA market research and marketing models, and independently evaluated UTOPIA’s business plan. At the direction of UTOPIA leadership, her work focused on improving the participating UTOPIA communities’ ongoing cash flow.
Ms. Hovis devised a business strategy and wrote a business plan for KINBER, the BTOP‐funded statewide backbone and middle‐mile fiber infrastructure focused on the higher education and healthcare sectors in Pennsylvania. One highlight of the KINBER strategy was developing an actionable plan to increase early cash flow.
Ms. Hovis developed a broadband feasibility study for Garrett County, Maryland with a specific focus on maximizing the benefits and use of the fiber backbone being built by the BTOP‐funded One Maryland Broadband Network (OMBN) project.
Grant Planning & Management Ms. Hovis’ expertise includes the many funding opportunities available to local government broadband planners through the federal government and other sources. She has guided clients through the grant process, from application writing to fund management. Ms. Hovis’ grant work has included:
Supporting more than a dozen clients in securing American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds through the Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP). Successful applicants included including the $22.5 million Urbana‐Champaign Big Broadband (UC2B) project, the $115 million One Maryland Broadband Network (OMBN), the $32.1 million OpenCape project in Cape Cod, and Washington, D.C.’s $17.5 million Community Access Network (DC‐CAN).
Securing additional National Telecommunications & Information Administration (NTIA) funds from the Public Safety Interoperable Communications (PSIC) grant program on behalf of public health and public safety communications projects in the National Capital Region (NCR), encompassing Washington, D.C. and almost two‐dozen surrounding jurisdictions.
Developing a successful application to the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC)—a partnership among federal, state, and local government—for Garrett County, Maryland.
Providing business case development and ongoing business planning support to significant Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) grant‐funded projects in the NCR.
Advising a number of clients on Rural Utilities Service (RUS) grant applications, and
Page 52 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
27
reviewing business plans and projections that make use of RUS loan funds for entities such as UTOPIA, the regional non‐profit open access fiber network in suburban and rural Utah.
Speaking and Advocacy Ms. Hovis is in wide demand as a speaker and expert source on broadband deployment issues. She has testified before the U.S. Congress on matters of broadband deployment and policy; has been interviewed by publications including Business Week, the Washington Post, and the Baltimore Sun; and has been featured on the C‐SPAN show “The Communicators.” She has provided expert presentations to the Federal Communications Commission, National League of Cities, Technology Policy Summit, the University of Illinois, Case Western Reserve University, the New America Foundation, and the Congressional Internet Caucus. Ms. Hovis recently authored “Gigabit Communities: Technical Strategies for Facilitating Public or Private Broadband Construction in Your Community”—an independent report sponsored by Google and intended as a guide for local government leaders and planners. EDUCATION Juris Doctor, with honors, University of Chicago Law School, 1994 Patino Fellow, awarded for academic achievement and community service, 1991–94
Bachelor of Arts, with distinction, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1990 PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS/LICENSES Member of Illinois Bar Association, Member of District of Columbia Bar Association ORGANIZATIONS
Coalition for Local Internet Choice, CEO Benton Foundation, Director Fiber Broadband Association, Director United States Unified Community Anchor Network, Task Force on Community Anchor
Network Economic Models, Charter Member National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors, Past President
PRIOR TO COMING TO CTC IN 1997 1996–1997 Litigation/Communications Attorney, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky, & Popeo
P.C., Washington, D.C. 1994–1996 Litigation Attorney, Jenner & Block, Chicago
Page 53 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
28
AndrewAfflerbach,Ph.D.,P.E.|CEOandChiefTechnologyOfficer
Dr. Andrew Afflerbach specializes in planning, design, and implementation of communications infrastructure and networks. His expertise includes emerging fiber and wireless technologies and state‐of‐the‐art networking applications.
As Chief Technology Officer, he oversees all engineering work performed by CTC Technology & Energy. He is a licensed Professional Engineer in the Commonwealth of Virginia and the states of Delaware, Maryland, and Illinois.
Dr. Afflerbach has planned and overseen implementation of a wide variety of government and public safety networks, including the infrastructure of state and metropolitan area governments. He prepared extensive technical analyses for submission to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and policymakers on national fiber expansion to underserved schools and libraries, on due diligence for the IP transition of the telecommunications infrastructure, and on potential technical frameworks for wireless network neutrality. He also recently served as a senior adviser to Crown Fibre Holdings, the public entity that is directing New Zealand’s national fiber‐to‐the‐home project.
Broadband Planning and Engineering
Dr. Afflerbach has architected, designed, and overseen implementation of numerous broadband networks for local and state governments, including those of Washington, D.C.; Crown Fibre Holdings (Government of New Zealand); San Francisco; the Commonwealth of Kentucky; the Delaware Department of Transportation; the Maryland Transportation Authority; St. Louis Park, Minnesota; and many large counties.
Advisory Services
Dr. Afflerbach advises a wide range of policy think tanks, U.S. federal agencies, and non‐profits regarding the engineering issues underlying key communications issues. For example, he:
Leads the technical team conducting FirstNet planning for the District of Columbia (Washington, D.C.).
Serves as key technical adviser to the Commonwealth of Kentucky as it deploys it statewide Next Generation Kentucky Information Network.
Provided expert testimony to the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the matter of the preparation of the national broadband plan as a representative of the National Association of Counties (NACo) and the National Association of Telecommunications Officers & Advisors (NATOA).
Served as expert adviser regarding broadband deployment to the U.S. Conference of Mayors, NACo, National League of Cities, and NATOA in those organizations’ filings before the FCC in the matter of determination of the deployment of a national, interoperable wireless network in the 700 MHz spectrum.
In connection with the FCC’s ongoing Open Internet proceeding, advised the New America
Page 54 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
29
Foundation regarding the technical pathways by which “any device” and “any application” regimes could be achieved in the wireless broadband arena as they have been in the wireline area.
Provided expert technical advice on the 700 MHz broadband and AWS‐3 proceedings at the FCC for the Public Interest Spectrum Coalition (including Free Press, the New America Foundation, Consumers Union, and the Media Access Project).
Prepared technical reports and analysis regarding fiber construction for submittal to the FCC, in connection with preparation of the National Broadband Plan, by NATOA, the City and County of San Francisco, and the Schools, Health, and Libraries Coalition.
Served as technical adviser to the Naval Exchange in its evaluation of vendors’ broadband communications services on U.S. Navy bases worldwide.
Advised the U.S. Internal Revenue Service regarding the history of broadband and cable deployment and related technical issues in that agency’s evaluation of appropriate regulations for those industries.
Advised, during the height of the broadband “open access” debate, a variety of public interest associations and communities, including the City of Los Angeles and Stanford University, regarding the technical means by which cable networks could be opened to competition.
Advised the Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society on the technical issues for their briefs in the Brand X Supreme Court appeal regarding cable broadband.
Provided technical advice to numerous non‐profits, associations, and agencies as diverse as the Center for Internet and Society at Stanford Law School; the Internal Revenue Service, the Alliance for Community Media, the William Penn Foundation, the Center for Digital Democracy, and the FCC’s Local and State Government Advisory Board (LSGAC).
Has been invited to speak about communications technologies before such organizations as the Public Technology Institute, American Association of Community Colleges, ICMA, ILCMA, and the Practicing Law Institute.
Developed curricula for a variety of organizations, including the University of Maryland, the United States Department of Transportation, and the George Washington University.
Has taught courses and delivered seminars regarding communications for numerous educational and government institutions.
Public Safety Network Interoperability and Interconnection
Dr. Afflerbach served as lead engineer and technical architect for planning and development of NCRnet, a regional fiber‐optic and microwave network that links public safety and emergency support users throughout the 19 jurisdictions of the National Capital Region (Washington, D.C. and surrounding jurisdictions), under a grant from the U.S. Department for Homeland Security’s Urban Areas Safety Initiative. He wrote the initial feasibility studies that led to this project for regional network interconnection.
Smart Grid
Dr. Afflerbach and the CTC team provided expert testimony and advisory services to the Public
Page 55 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
30
Service Commission of Maryland regarding Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI). CTC provided objective guidance to the staff as it evaluated AMI applications submitted by three of the state’s investor‐owned utilities (IOUs). This contract represented the first time the PSC staff had asked a consultant to advise them on technology—a reflection of the lack of standards in the Smart Grid arena, and the magnitude of the investment that the utilities were proposing.
Instruction/Expertise
Dr. Afflerbach has served as an instructor for the U.S. Federal Highway Association/National Highway Institute, the George Washington University Continuing Education Program, the University of Maryland Instructional TV Program, ITS America, Law Seminars International, and the COMNET Exposition.
He teaches and helped develop an online graduate‐level course for the University of Maryland. He developed and taught communications courses and curricula for ITS America, COMNET, and University of Maryland. His analysis of cable open access is used in the curriculum of the International Training Program on Utility Regulation and Strategy at the University of Florida.
Dr. Afflerbach has also prepared client tutorials and presented papers on emerging telecommunications technology to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), NATOA, the National League of Cities (NLC), the International City/County Management Association (ICMA), and the American Association of Community Colleges (AACC). He also taught college‐level astrophysics at the University of Wisconsin.
EMPLOYMENT HISTORY 1995–Present CEO/Chief Technology Officer, CTC
Previously Director of Engineering, Principal Engineer, Senior Scientist 1990–1996 Astronomer/Instructor/Researcher University of Wisconsin–Madison, NASA, and Swarthmore College EDUCATION Ph.D., Astronomy, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1996 Master of Science, Astronomy, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1993 Bachelor of Arts, Physics, Swarthmore College, 1991 PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS/LICENSES Professional Engineer, Commonwealth of Virginia and states of Delaware, Maryland, and Illinois HONORS/ORGANIZATIONS
Association of Public‐Safety Communications Officials (APCO) Board of Visitors, University of Wisconsin Department of Astronomy National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors (NATOA) Technology
and Public Safety Committees Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association (AFCEA) Society of Cable and Telecommunications Engineers (SCTE)
Page 56 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
31
Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) Charleston Defense Contractors Association (CDCA) NASA Graduate Fellow, 1993–1996. Research fellowship in astrophysics Elected Member, Sigma Xi Scientific Research Honor Society Eugene M. Lang Scholar, 1987–1991, Swarthmore College
SELECTED PUBLICATIONS, PRESENTATIONS, and COURSES
“Mobile Broadband Networks Can Manage Congestion While Abiding By Open Internet Principles,” prepared for the New America Foundation’s Open Technology Institute – Wireless Future Project, November 2014.
“The State of the Art and Evolution of Cable Television and Broadband Technology,” prepared for Public Knowledge, November 2014.
“A Model for Understanding the Cost to Connect Schools and Libraries with Fiber Optics,” prepared for the Schools, Health & Libraries Broadband Coalition, October 2014.
“The Art of the Possible: An Overview of Public Broadband Options,” prepared jointly with the New America Foundation’s Open Technology Institute, May 2014.
“Understanding Broadband Performance Factors,” with Tom Asp, Broadband Communities magazine, March/April 2014.
“A Brief Assessment of Engineering Issues Related to Trial Testing for IP Transition,” prepared for Public Knowledge and sent to the FCC as part of its proceedings on Advancing Technology Transitions While Protecting Network Values, January 2014
“Gigabit Communities: Technical Strategies for Facilitating Public or Private Broadband Construction in Your Community,” prepared as a guide for local government leaders and planners (sponsored by Google), January 2014
“Critical Partners in Data Driven Science: Homeland Security and Public Safety,” submitted to the Workshop on Advanced Regional & State Networks (ARNs): Envisioning the Future as Critical Partners in Data‐Driven Science, Internet2 workshop chaired by Mark Johnson, CTO of MCNC, Washington, D.C., April 2013
“Connected Communities: How a City Can Plan and Implement Public Safety & Public Wireless,” submitted to the International Wireless Communications Exposition, Las Vegas, Nevada, March 2013
“Cost Estimate for Building Fiber Optics to Key Anchor Institutions,” prepared for submittal to the FCC by the National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors and the Schools, Health, and Libraries Coalition, September 2009.
“Efficiencies Available Through Simultaneous Construction and Co‐location of Communications Conduit and Fiber,” prepared for submittal to the FCC by the National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors and the City and County of San Francisco, 2009, referenced in the National Broadband Plan.
“How the National Capital Region Built a 21st Century Regional Communications Network” and “Why City and County Communications are at Risk,” invited presentation at the FCC’s National Broadband Plan workshop, August 25, 2009.
Page 57 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
32
“Existing and Emerging Broadband Technologies,” NATOA Conference, October 2007. “An Assessment of the Technical Capabilities of the AWS‐3 Spectrum,” expert report
prepared for Free Press, December 2007. “An Engineering Assessment of Select Technical Issues Raised in the 700 MHz
Proceeding,” expert report prepared for FCC filing for Free Press and Media Access Project (Public Interest Spectrum Coalition), May 2007.
“Understanding FiOS and U‐Verse Architecture,” presented at NATOA’s Policy and Legal Conference, Washington, D.C., spring 2007.
“Fiber to the Premises and Fiber to the Node,” Journal of Municipal Telecommunications Policy, Fall 2006.
“Communications Infrastructure Primer,” presented to the National Fire Protection Association, Miami Beach, FL, 2006.
Supplemental Report, “Technological Analysis of Open Access and Cable Systems,” http://www.aclu.org/Privacy/Privacy.cfm?ID=17507, prepared for American Civil Liberties Union and Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society, 2005.
Affordable Telecommunication Networks for Local Government, International City/County Management Association, November 2004.
“Telecommunications and ITS: What You Need To Know,” prepared curriculum for two‐day training course for the University of Maryland, 2001.
“Technological Analysis of Open Access and Cable Systems,” prepared for ACLU, 2001. “No Pipes: Wireless Broadband,” Journal of Municipal Telecommunications Policy, 2001. “Interactive PEG: Technical Strategy for Implementation,” Community Media Review,
2000. “Telecommunications and Intelligent Transportation Services,” two‐day training course,
presented in multiple cities for the US Department of Transportation/ITS America, 1999. “Building Integrated Voice, Data, and Video Networks for the Local and Wide Area,”
two‐day training course, presented for the University of Maryland, 1999. “Integrated Data, Video & Voice Broadband Networks,” week‐long training course,
presented at the COMNET Exposition, Washington, DC, and January, 1999. “LANs: Design and Installation of Networks that Support Voice, Data, and Video
Applications,” multi‐day training course, presented for the George Washington University Continuing Engineering Education Program, 1996; 1997; 1998; 1999.
Cable Network Technology: A Primer for Local Officials, International City/County Management Association, September 1998.
“I‐Nets and the Internet,” Infotech Report, August 1998. “Integrated Data, Video & Voice Broadband Networks” and “Design & Implementation
of Metropolitan Area Networks (MANs),” presented at the 1998 COMNET Exposition.
Page 58 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
33
ThomasJ.Asp,BSEE,MBA|PrincipalEngineerandAnalyst Mr. Asp specializes in evaluating connectivity (voice, video, and data) options and recommending effective solutions for clients throughout the United States. He holds more than 25 years of experience as an engineer and analyst in communications and public power systems. His experience includes electric and telecommunication system design, network feasibility, evaluation of the financial impact of projects on operations, and provision of expert testimony. Mr. Asp is recognized as an expert in evaluating and offering recommendations regarding municipal broadband communications systems. He has been actively involved with telecommunication market research and feasibility analysis for over a decade, both with CTC and previously as a partner at the public accounting firm of Virchow Krause (Baker Tilley). Mr. Asp also has significant experience in the communications industry working in the areas of cellular, cable TV, broadband, and mobile radio, including as a product manager in the Cellular Mobile Telephone, Automatic Meter Reading, and Distribution Automation industries. Broadband Networks (Wired and Wireless) Mr. Asp is regarded as one of the premiere analysts in the United States regarding municipal planning and deployment of broadband systems to meet economic development, digital inclusion, and other needs. He has assisted numerous local governments, municipal utilities, and municipal consortia to evaluate their communities’ communications needs and determine the financial parameters and business case for meeting those needs. In this area, Mr. Asp’s experience includes preparing connectivity feasibility studies for municipal networks, including economic analysis, market assessment, technology review, vendor analysis, and business plan development. He has assisted numerous communities with evaluating the feasibility of advanced connectivity services alternatives including provider partnerships and city‐owned networks. He has reviewed options under cable franchise agreement for municipal purchase and operation. Mr. Asp has reviewed offerings and operations of incumbent telecommunications providers and assisted in negotiations with incumbent telecommunications providers to enhance availability of existing services and to encourage new and innovative offerings. Some select examples of his projects include:
Provided Jackson (Tennessee) Energy Authority an independent evaluation of responses to JEA’s 2010 request for proposals (RFP) soliciting vendors to provide wholesale voice services. With JEA staff input, he developed the evaluation system and scoring matrix to ensure a balanced approach that best met JEA’s needs. Responses were evaluated on the basis of strategic fit, operational fit, reliability, and overall cost; recommended two respondents as finalists for further consideration by JEA; and assisted JEA in negotiating with those finalists. As a final step in the process, CTC presented to JEA management a written report recommending the “best‐fit” vendor.
Page 59 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
34
Completed a business and technology plan for Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) to determine the feasibility of expanding the connectivity services offered to the businesses and institutions over the Department’s fiber network. Included in the analysis was a valuation of additional fiber routes that LADWP acquired from the City of Los Angeles.
Served as a business consultant to the City and County of San Francisco. Investigated the feasibility of the city building and operating a fiber‐to‐the‐premises (FTTP) network to every home and business in San Francisco. The project included an analysis of multiple business models and business recommendations customized for San Francisco’s unique circumstances.
Developed a business case analysis for DC‐Net, a District‐owned and operated fiber optic telecommunications network that provides voice and data services. The network consists of resilient, interconnected fiber optic rings that connect more than 400 government buildings in the District, including Police Department, Emergency Management Agency, and Fire Department radio towers.
Conducted a feasibility study, a business case analysis, and an “off‐the‐balance‐sheet” benefits analysis for a fiber‐optic network proposed by the mayor of the City of Seattle. The first study, FTTP Municipal Broadband Risks and Benefits Evaluation, sponsored by Seattle City Light, included the following elements:
Internal needs analysis Market research of both residential and business Assessment of competing services and technologies Evaluation of the business case and business risks
Following on that report, Mr. Asp researched and wrote an FTTP Benefits Evaluation for the City, which explored the benefits of FTTP beyond the traditional balance sheet, including cost avoidance, monetary savings, and environmental impact.
Performed an expert assessment of a business and marketing plan for Utah Telecommunication Open Infrastructure Agencies (UTOPIA’s) open access FTTP network. The project included a strategy session with key stakeholders, collection of relevant background material, an analysis of UTOPIA market research and marketing models, and an independent evaluation of UTOPIA’s business plan. Mr. Asp’s work focused on improving the participating UTOPIA communities’ ongoing cash flow and increasing participation of households and businesses in those communities.
Prepared a fiber optic business plan for Richland Utilities, Washington to meet the needs of city facilities, the electric utility, schools, hospitals, banks, and other institutions. Work included preparation of various business models, review of operational requirements, and preparation of pro‐forma financial statements.
Provided extensive business planning assistance to the State of Maryland’s One Maryland program, which lead to build an interconnected fiber‐optic broadband network that reaches every county and city in Maryland and will provide backbone and middle‐mile capacity for commercial carriers.
Managed project assisting Bountiful City, UT with the development of a business plan for a citywide wireless network. This project included the review of a conceptual design,
Page 60 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
35
reviewing proposed business relationships and staffing, and conducting a cost‐benefit analysis.
Project manager in assisting Ames, IA with the review of existing architecture, development of a network design, and preparation of detailed cost estimates for the acquisition and installation of Wi‐Fi hot spots and supporting infrastructure. This project has now moved into implementation preparations.
Led consulting team in investigating several Wi‐Fi deployment models, development of a business plan (including market research and financial analysis), and development of a partnership RFP for St. Louis Park, MN. Mr. Asp assisted the city to pilot the network and then prepared specifications and bid documents to identify both integrators and operators for the network.
Assisted the City of Tucson, AZ with a wireless feasibility study that included market research, competitive industry assessment, internal and external needs assessments, financial analysis, and the development of a business plan.
Assistance in the implementation of an Institutional Fiber Network (I‐Net) for Norwich Public Utilities in Norwich, CT. Project included development of a plan and strategy for the Fiber Optic Enterprise.
DA, AMR, SCADA In the areas of Distribution Automation (DA), Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA), mobile radio, and Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI), Mr. Asp has assisted municipal utilities and public power cooperatives with extensive evaluative and design services. Specifically, he has prepared evaluations and submitted recommendations on AMI alternatives and benefits. He has assessed existing and evolving technologies and services to support AMI and DA for electric utilities and has developed and directed demonstration plans to test technologies to support distribution automation ‐‐ including providing recommendations for establishing vendor alliances, performing research and designs networks to combine multi‐utility communications, and outlining, evaluating, and recommending communication requirements and options for electric utility DA, SCADA, mobile radio, and AMI. TESTIMONY & VALUATION In addition to assisting over 80 communities and counties in evaluating financial opportunities to provide voice, data, and video services, Mr. Asp has provided financial and technical testimony and expert advice. Some examples include:
Conducted an exhaustive business case analysis and prepared expert witness testimony on behalf of the City of Alameda in a federal court case involving the business practices, business results, and ultimate sale of its fiber optic enterprise. The testimony included a comparative analysis of business models employed by municipal fiber networks nationwide and a review and valuation of several recent cable business transactions.
Maryland Public Service Commission regarding Baltimore Gas & Electric’s application for deployment of AMI and smart grid technologies. Written and sworn testimony included an analysis of smart grid technologies, vendor development, and impact to rates.
Page 61 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
36
Pacific Gas & Electric regarding the financial and technical viability of the use of Broadband over Power line (BPL) for Automatic Meter Reading (AMR) and support of new business opportunities. Mr. Asp prepared a report in anticipation of being called to testify before the California PUC
The City of Lebanon, OH in connection with a dispute over an Assessment of Infrastructure Connectivity Fee with home‐builders and Time Warner Cable. The Assessment and disposition regarded the reasonableness of the connection fee assessed to each new home by the municipal telecom department
The City of Marshal, MO in determination of the value of the incumbent cable television system owned and operated by Time Warner.
EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Electrical Engineering, North Dakota State University, 1979 Master of Business Administration, University of St. Thomas, St. Paul, 1989
Page 62 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
37
MatthewDeHaven|PrincipalEngineerandProjectManager
Matthew DeHaven specializes in wired and wireless communications and broadband telecommunications technology for public safety and other local government and institutional needs. He has over 13 years of extensive engineering experience designing, developing, installing, and overseeing integration of local and wide area networks for institutional, public safety, and Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) applications, video‐networking solutions, and unified communications systems.
Mr. DeHaven has experience at many levels of network design, procurement, and implementation for high‐capacity metropolitan‐area networks to support converged video, voice, and data communications. He leads network designs and the preparation of specifications for competitive bid processes, serves as project manager overseeing implementation and testing for a wide range of government clients. Mr. DeHaven prepares designs and cost models to support decision‐makers in the deployment of a range of data network technologies, traditional telephone systems, voice‐over‐IP (VoIP) networks, one‐way video distribution, and two‐way videoconferencing. His data network experience includes work with SONET, Ethernet, and ATM
networks using a range of fiber optic, copper, and wireless technologies. He serves as CTC’s lead engineer on numerous wide area network projects.
Among many other projects, he served as a one of the primary technical architects for the 19 jurisdiction fiber optic/microwave network currently deployed in the National Capital Region (NCRnet) to support public safety interoperable communications.
Inter‐County Broadband Network
Originally serving as part of the grant application development team that successfully led the State of Maryland to a $115 million Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) administered by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), Mr. DeHaven served as the Portfolio Manager for the One Maryland Inter‐County Broadband Network BTOP grant project.
The ICBN is a nine‐jurisdiction consortium in central Maryland led by Howard County, Maryland, and is a key sub‐recipient of the State’s grant award. Mr. DeHaven is the lead technical consultant overseeing the use of approximately $72 million in grant funds to build over 800 miles of fiber optics and directly connect approximately 650 community anchor institutions, including schools, libraries, government buildings, community colleges, and public safety agencies. Mr. DeHaven was tasked with overseeing numerous engineering and construction contractors, as well as playing a key role in overall network design during this aggressive three‐year endeavor that began in late 2010.
Page 63 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
38
Wireless Communications
Mr. DeHaven assesses clients’ existing and projected wireless broadband needs and recommends potential strategies for using new technologies to enhance and improve network operations and services. Some select examples of his ongoing and past projects include:
Engineering support of the ongoing deployment of a citywide 4.9 GHz public safety radio mesh network for the City of Port Angeles, WA. CTC conducted a needs assessment of the city’s network and reviewed public safety mobile data communications considerations, which led to the development of network specifications and overseeing the procurement for the expansion of the city’s fiber network and a citywide wireless network serving both public safety and public access needs.
Provided an updated assessment and review to Cincinnati, OH of the city’s current networks and recommended updates to the long‐term strategic plan originally prepared in 2004. This project involves assessing and identifying new department and network application needs, assessing the current networks to meet identified needs, assessing emerging fiber and wireless technologies, recommending wireless strategies, and providing recommendations and strategies for meeting foreseeable needs.
Developed a strategic plan for a wireless data network to meet public safety and local government needs in Seattle, WA. CTC previously conducted a feasibility study that identified these needs.
Design of a broadband wireless network for Annapolis, MD that provides connectivity for a citywide video surveillance system. The network was designed to provide high‐degrees of security and have substantial reserve capacity to support the addition of new video requirements, expand toll‐quality IP‐based voice and data services, and, potentially, provide backhaul for a future mobile wireless solution.
Oversight of the design and implementation of a “wireless downtown” for Skokie, IL to enhance economic development and Internet accessibility for residents and visitors.
Project oversight in developing an infrastructure plan to support the implementation of Wi‐Fi services throughout a downtown area targeted for economic development in Rockville, MD. The plan focuses on deploying a flexible architecture of physical support infrastructure to enable a wide range of wireless connectivity options for visitors, residents, and business tenants while maintaining the aesthetics of the development.
Evaluation of bids from wireless service providers who responded to the city of Mesa, AZ’s RFP. CTC also, in an earlier phase of the project, provided an assessment of Wi‐Fi technology and potential expansion of the fiber‐optic infrastructure via mass wireless communications—potentially for an intelligent transportation system application and for free Internet access for citizens.
Research on current and future wireless technologies and evaluation of the feasibility of implementing a secure public safety wireless network in Prince George’s County, MD. Designed and implemented a pilot project to test the feasibility of a public safety network. A successful solution was deployed to enable Mobile Data Computers in emergency
Page 64 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
39
response vehicles to securely roam from a carrier CDMA network to private, County‐operated Wi‐Fi hotspots.
Public Safety Networking
In addition to supporting the design and deployment of NCRnet, Mr. DeHaven is the lead engineer responsible for one of the key applications leveraging this regional network. Mr. DeHaven is responsible for the design, implementation, and ongoing operations of a regional videoconferencing network supporting Emergency Management among the 21 jurisdictions in the National Capital Region (DC, MD, VA). CTC developed the systems’ designs and oversaw
implementation under a grant from the Department of Homeland Security Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI). This network now serves thousands of end users, integrated tightly with the ever growing videoconferencing and VoIP systems leveraged by these jurisdictions.
In Anne Arundel County, MD, Mr. DeHaven assisted with the deployment of traffic surveillance cameras. He provided analysis of candidate technical solutions for cameras using the County’s high‐speed fiber‐optic I‐Net to transport video and control signals, developed system
specifications, and oversaw the implementation of the County’s video surveillance capabilities.
Mr. DeHaven was also involved in the planning and implementation of a statewide network in Delaware for the purpose of providing traffic information and traffic control capabilities to transportation management facilities. Such a network allows remote control of traffic signal systems and variable message displays, while providing real‐time traffic surveillance in the form
of video images and microwave sensor data. He has developed expertise in the numerous forms of technology used in this type of project, ranging from fiber optics to wireless digital spread‐spectrum communications.
Mr. DeHaven serves as CTC’s lead engineer with respect to the Delaware Department of Transportation’s Advanced Traffic Advisory Radio System, the first Advanced TARS system in the country. In that capacity, he is responsible for training and advising on‐site staff, specifying and installing new equipment, and monitoring performance of the system.
Video and Broadcast Communications Engineering
Mr. DeHaven’s experience includes the management, design, and procurement of video, voice, and data networks. Some select examples of his recent project work include:
Analysis of the technical options to allow The Rockville Channel (Rockville, MD) to support live cablecasting from multiple facilities, including the implementation of an IP‐based video and audio transmission system. He also managed the relocation of the master
Page 65 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
40
control and studio production systems for The Rockville Channel. CTC successfully executed the relocation during the tight window of opportunity between live production events, while making enhancements to system layout and cabling infrastructure and keeping the channel “on‐air” during the process.
Development and implementation of videoconferencing and teleconferencing tools for the 21 jurisdictions in the National Capital Region (DC, MD, VA) Emergency Operations Centers (EOCs) and Emergency Communications Centers (ECCs) over a state‐of‐the‐art fiber‐optic and microwave network.
Preparation of system‐level design recommendations and cost estimates for an extensive, countywide system to support interactive and on‐demand video training communications for the Anne Arundel (MD) County Fire Department. CTC also developed the design for a video display system for the Fire Department’s new dispatch center, intended to allow key sources of information to be prominently displayed throughout the facility.
Preparation of system‐level design recommendations and cost estimates for an extensive, citywide system to support interactive and on‐demand video communications for training, emergency collaboration, and routine meetings between Mesa, AZ Fire Department personnel. CTC also integrated a pilot videoconferencing system to demonstrate certain capabilities of the system design.
Development of a videoconferencing system for homeland security applications on behalf of Arlington County, VA—the site of the September 11, 2001 Pentagon attack. The system links numerous public safety and other government users and aims to ensure uninterrupted emergency communications in the event of a terrorist attack or natural disaster.
Instruction/Expertise
Mr. DeHaven led the CTC research team in preparing Web‐based Intelligent Transportation System (ITS)‐Communications courses on behalf of the University of Maryland Center for Advanced Transportation Technology. He has served as an online instructor for these courses for more than six years.
EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Electrical Engineering, in progress, The Johns Hopkins University SAMPLE PUBLICATIONS/COURSES
“What’s the Fuss About Fiber? A Comparative Analysis of Fiber and Copper Physical Media,” Journal of Municipal Telecommunications Policy, Spring 2009.
“Deploying Public Safety Networks: Costs and Benefits – 4.9 GHz for Video Surveillance,” presented at annual SEATOA Conference, April 2008.
“Busting the Technology Myths,” presented at NATOA Conference, October 2007. “Wi‐Fi and Beyond: Taming Technology for your Community,” presented at the annual
TATOA Conference, August 2007.
Page 66 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
41
EricWirth|SeniorProjectEngineer
Eric Wirth has almost 15 years of communications engineering experience; he specializes in evaluating broadband (video, voice, and data) telecommunications networks, analyzing emerging broadband technologies, and designing broadband networks for institutional uses. In addition, Mr. Wirth is conducting extensive and ongoing research on applications for Internet Protocol (IP) technology, including video‐over‐IP (VoIP) for video transmission over wide area networks, video conferencing, and other communication applications for wide area networks.
Utility and Public Safety Fiber Optic Networking
Mr. Wirth’s experience includes the design and implementation of a variety of fiber optic communications network. Some select examples of his work include:
Design and pricing of fiber optic cable, electronics, and overall architecture of a survivable emergency communications system for Tennessee Valley Public Power Association (TVPPA) distributors. The design included MPLS and DWDM technology, and leveraged TVPPA and distributor fiber.
Design and implementation of a fiber optic network for Norwich (Connecticut) Public Utilities. The project consisted of developing detailed fiber optic route design and cost estimates, network electronic design and cost estimates (including SCADA transportation), and a request for proposals (RFP) for Norwich’s use in selecting a contractor to complete the installation. In addition to serving the utility’s needs, the fiber optic network was designed to serve city, schools, and hospital users.
Fiber optic network and electronics design, and RFP development, for the City of Dover, Delaware Electric Department. Mr. Wirth developed a fiber optic network design to provide additional redundancy and functionality for the existing city fiber optic network. In addition, he developed a network electronics design to leverage the new fiber optic communications links to increase the reliability of the city’s network.
Fiber optic network design and feasibility analysis for the City of Palo Alto, California. The City is examining several fiber optic construction projects to expand its existing fiber optic network to further meet the needs of the city and surrounding school districts, and to increase the footprint of its commercial fiber optic network. As a municipal electric, Palo Alto is exploring several options for fiber optic design.
Wireless Communications
Mr. Wirth has extensive experience working on numerous wireless networking projects, from
analysis and feasibility to design and implementation. These networks range in scope from small hot spots to area‐wide and regional networks. Some representative examples of his projects include:
Page 67 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
42
Designing and overseeing the implementation of a citywide broadband wireless network project that will provide integrated communications and interoperability among all local public safety entities in the City of Port Angeles, Washington. The high‐capacity 4.9 GHz broadband wireless network provides public safety staff in the field with full and timely access to state, federal, and GIS databases, and will allow EMS responders to access medical databases and support on‐site telemetry of patient status. A commercial “open access” multi‐provider wireless access system was deployed as a public–private partnership with a local Internet service provider (ISP); it provides citywide Wi‐Fi services in the 2.4 GHz band. The city and the local ISP partner have developed a subscription package that is attractive to a wide range of commercial, residential, and public sector users.
Designing a cost‐effective broadband wireless network for the City of Annapolis, Maryland. This network serves as a backbone to provide connectivity for a video surveillance system throughout downtown Annapolis. The network has the capacity to meet all current needs, provide 99.999 percent availability, and have substantial reserve capacity to support the addition of new video requirements, expanded IP‐based voice and data services, and support backhaul for a potential mobile wireless solution.
Acting as lead engineer for the design and implementation of a microwave network to enable communications between public health agencies in Maryland and the District of Columbia. The microwave project is designed to provide connectivity to area hospitals to ensure reliable communications and data sharing in the event of problems with the public communications infrastructure. In addition, the robust microwave connectivity allows for day‐to‐day data sharing, voice communications, and interoperable communications. This connectivity will provide the transport mechanism necessary for patient tracking and other information sharing platforms.
Public Safety Networking
Some representative examples of Mr. Wirth’s projects include:
Designed, implemented and tested a backhaul network for the Arlington County, Virginia public safety radio network. The backhaul network consists of SONET equipment over a county‐owned fiber optic network that increases the reliability and availability of the public safety radio system.
Lead engineer for the design and implementation of a 19‐jurisdiction regional fiber optic public safety interconnection network in the National Capital Region (DC, MD, VA). NCRnet provides an interoperable, robust, and reliable fiber infrastructure to augment the communication capabilities of first responder communities in the NCR. These communities include local and regional law enforcement, fire, emergency management, transportation, and public health agencies.
Performed radio frequency (RF) coverage analysis and prepared design recommendations for improving public safety radio coverage for Warren County, Pennsylvania. Included
Page 68 of 75
CTC Proposal to City of Mt. Dora | September 2018
43
analysis of the county’s existing public safety radio system and recommendations to improve coverage for both the county’s public safety radio system and commercial cellular.
Collaborated on the development of a master telecommunications plan for the Delaware Department of Transportation. The plan acts as a guide for the department to consolidate several disparate network environments into a unified communications network capable of supporting current and future transportation and public safety applications. Part of the plan involves developing a system‐level design that incorporates fiber optics, microwave, and land‐mobile radio. The plan requires coordination among a variety of state agencies to develop a network that meets the department’s critical public safety requirements.
Video and Broadcast Communications Engineering
Mr. Wirth’s experience includes the design and implementation of video, voice, and data networks. Some select examples of his work include:
Designed and implemented a public, educational, and governmental (PEG) access and monitoring network for Montgomery County, Maryland. The network uses IP‐based video encoders and the County’s state‐of‐the‐art IT network to improve the quality and functionality of video transport throughout the county.
Developed a design and integration solution for cablecast channels for Monterey County, California. Analyzed the existing audio‐visual and broadcast systems and developed recommendations for future development. Designed an IP‐based video server system capable of recording and airing live meetings and scheduling cable/broadcasts. Completed on‐site integration, testing, and training on the video server system.
Designed and implemented state‐of‐the‐art videoconferencing and teleconferencing tools for the 19 jurisdictions in the National Capital Region Emergency Operations Centers (EOCs) and Emergency Communications Centers (ECCs). CTC developed the systems’ designs and oversaw implementation to interconnect the EOCs and ECCs throughout the region, under a grant from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI).
EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Electrical Engineering, University of Virginia, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Charlottesville, Virginia, 2004. PRIOR TO COMING TO CTC IN 2004 1998‐2003, Technician, Schnabel Engineering, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland
Page 69 of 75
510 N. Baker St.Mount Dora, FL 32757
352-735-7126
DATE: October 16, 2018
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Robin R. Hayes, City Manager
SUBJECT: Voluntary Annexation Process
Introduction:Provide feedback to streamline the voluntary annexation process.
Discussion:Voluntary annexation follows Chapter 171.044 Florida Statutes, as explained in Attachment #1. Eligible annexation proposals must be contiguous to the existing City Limits, the lands reasonably compact, and all owners must consent. The current annexation process tracks through the City’s normal development procedures: 1) Development Review Committee; 2) Planning and Zoning Commission; and 3) City Council with two readings of the ordinance. The current process that includes Joint Planning Area agreement notification of proposed petitions for annexation to Lake County takes approximately 90 days. As confirmed by the City Attorney, the process can be condensed and will allow for an expedited adoption. This change in process is consistent with Florida Statues and the City’s Land Development Code. The City's Land Development Code provides general steps for annexations (see Attachment #2). The change in the process would streamline voluntary annexation process from 90 days to 45 days (review by DRC, JPA Notice to County, and one reading/adoption of the ordinance). Florida Statutes enables these type of actions with only one ordinance reading.
Given the potential for the large number of voluntary annexations in an around the Wolf Branch Innovation District, this streamlined process will make the process more efficient. With the waiver of annexation application fees it is imperative to process these applications in the most efficient manner possible.
Budget Impact:The City's ad valorem tax base will expand as the City Limits of the City are annexed in a logical pattern.
City Council approved Resolution No. 2017-05 on January 17, 2017, waiving fees for a two-year period. The single-family annexation application fee of $150.00 has been waived. The fee
Page 70 of 75
Office of the City Manager Memorandum -- Page 2 of 2
waiver sunsets on January 17, 2019.
Strategic Impact:The City’s annexation program is consistent with Growth Management and Economic Development Goals for continuation of annexations of areas that are logical and fill in the logical and natural boundaries of the City Limits impacts the City in a favorable manner.
Recommendation City Council to provide direction to proceed with streamlining the annexation process.
Attachment(s):1. Florida Statutes2. Land Development Code
Prepared by: Vince Sandersfeld, Planning and Development DirectorReviewed by: Adam Sumner, CRA Administrator Approved - 09/19/2018
Tim Wilson, Approved - 09/25/2018Sherry Sutphen , City Attorney Approved - 10/10/2018Gwen Johns, City Clerk Approved - 10/11/2018Misty Sommer, Deputy City Clerk Approved - 10/11/2018Robin Hayes, City Manager Final Approval - 10/11/2018
Page 71 of 75
The 2018 Florida Statutes Title XII MUNICIPALITIES Chapter 171 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARIES View Entire Chapter
171.044 Voluntary annexation.—
(1) The owner or owners of real property in an unincorporated area of a county which is contiguous toa municipality and reasonably compact may petition the governing body of said municipality that saidproperty be annexed to the municipality.
(2) Upon determination by the governing body of the municipality that the petition bears thesignatures of all owners of property in the area proposed to be annexed, the governing body may, at anyregular meeting, adopt a nonemergency ordinance to annex said property and redefine the boundarylines of the municipality to include said property. Said ordinance shall be passed after notice of theannexation has been published at least once each week for 2 consecutive weeks in some newspaper insuch city or town or, if no newspaper is published in said city or town, then in a newspaper published inthe same county; and if no newspaper is published in said county, then at least three printed copies ofsaid notice shall be posted for 4 consecutive weeks at some conspicuous place in said city or town. Thenotice shall give the ordinance number and a brief, general description of the area proposed to beannexed. The description shall include a map clearly showing the area and a statement that thecomplete legal description by metes and bounds and the ordinance can be obtained from the office ofthe city clerk.
(3) An ordinance adopted under this section shall be filed with the clerk of the circuit court and thechief administrative officer of the county in which the municipality is located and with the Departmentof State within 7 days after the adoption of such ordinance. The ordinance must include a map whichclearly shows the annexed area and a complete legal description of that area by metes and bounds.
(4) The method of annexation provided by this section shall be supplemental to any other procedureprovided by general or special law, except that this section shall not apply to municipalities in countieswith charters which provide for an exclusive method of municipal annexation.
(5) Land shall not be annexed through voluntary annexation when such annexation results in thecreation of enclaves.
(6) Not fewer than 10 days prior to publishing or posting the ordinance notice required undersubsection (2), the governing body of the municipality must provide a copy of the notice, via certifiedmail, to the board of the county commissioners of the county wherein the municipality is located. Thenotice provision provided in this subsection may be the basis for a cause of action invalidating theannexation.
History.—s. 1, ch. 74-190; ss. 4, 5, ch. 75-297; s. 3, ch. 76-176; s. 2, ch. 86-113; s. 1, ch. 90-171; s. 16, ch. 90-279; s. 16, ch. 98-176; s. 3, ch. 2006-218.
Page 72 of 75
ATTACHMENT #2
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
CHAPTER I. OVERVIEW
1.3. Annexation.
Owners of land outside the city who desire to be incorporated within the city may petition for annexation subject to Florida law and the requirements of the city. The following steps should first be taken:
1. The existing city limits should be referenced to determine if the parcel is contiguous to the city.
2. The future land use map of the comprehensive plan should be referenced to determine if the parcel is within the city's planning area; annexations outside the planning area may also be considered.
3. City staff should be consulted to determine service capabilities, permitted land uses and the role of the county and other cities.
4. Petition. The petition for annexation must include:
a. Proof of ownership.
b. Name, address and signature of owner.
c. Survey, including legal description of property and street/road address.
d. Requested land use designation and zoning.
e. Method of providing services including water, sewer, roads, drainage, schools and police protection.
f. Justification for the proposal in relation to the comprehensive plans of the city and the county for ultimate review by the department of community affairs.
g. Processing fee.
Page 73 of 75
510 N. Baker St.Mount Dora, FL 32757
352-735-7126
DATE: October 16, 2018
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Robin R. Hayes, City Manager
SUBJECT: Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update from GAI Community Solutions Group, Inc.
Introduction:GAI Community Solution Group, Inc. will present their findings to date in regard to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan and request feedback from City Council in a workshop format.
Discussion:The City of Mount Dora contracted with GAI Community Solutions Group, Inc. in February 2018 to create a Parks and Recreation Master Plan. To date, their work includes:
Over 1400 web-based and written surveys have been collected from residents that provide feedback on the existing park system and recreation programs, how they use the parks and recreation, and what improvements they would like to see in the future.
Three focus groups, with 52 stakeholders in attendance, were facilitated by GAI to gather information and perspective of the existing parks and recreations systems.
The Consultant has performed an analysis of facilities and documented the existing conditions of the City's parks and recreations facilities, including digital surveys and continuity with neighboring jurisdictions.
GAI has presented the findings to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, the Technical Advisory Committee in a joint meeting and gathered their feedback.
The Consultant facilitated an open pubic workshop on September 20, 2018 to review the findings and began visioning the future of the parks and recreation system.
During the presentation, GAI will deliver an Existing Condition Analysis and a Survey and Inventory Data Deliverable and will be seeking feedback from Council in a workshop format.
Page 74 of 75
Office of the City Manager Memorandum -- Page 2 of 2
Budget Impact:The presentation will have no impact on the budget, but may highlight parks and recreation facilities that need future investment.
Strategic Impact:The Parks and Recreation Master Plan contributes to the strategic growth management, economic development, infrastructure and public safety of Mount Dora.
Recommendation Staff recommends that Council give open and honest feedback to GAI Community Solutions Group consultants in order to improve the outcome of the Parks and Recreations Master Plan.
Prepared by: Amy Jewell, Leisure Services DirectorReviewed by: Gwen Johns, City Clerk Approved - 10/08/2018
Misty Sommer, Deputy City Clerk Approved - 10/08/2018Robin Hayes, City Manager Final Approval - 10/08/2018
Page 75 of 75