Mr. Terry Welsh Costa Mesa, CA 92626-2306Mr. Terry Welsh 3086 Ceylon Rd Costa Mesa, CA 92626-2306...

Mr. Terry Welsh3086 Ceylon RdCosta Mesa, CA 92626-2306

Apr 24, 2013

Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Subject: Docket ID NRC20 130070, My Comments to the NRC: Do Not Restart San Onofre Unit 2

Dear Cindy Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear powerplant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation andindependent expert testimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-trackrestart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S. Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urgingthe NRC not to follow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a"preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRCstaff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Mr. Terry Welsh

Mr. Wayne Hornak535 Brookside DrToms River, NJ 08753-5601

Apr 24, 2013

Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-000 I

Subject: Docket ID NRC20130070, My Comments to the NRC: Do Not Restart San Onofre Unit 2

Dear Cindy Bladey,










Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Mr. Wayne Hornak

Mr. vern weller836 Newman StEast Tawas, MI 48730-9747

Apr 24, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,




We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a

"preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70%° power posed no significant safety risk.


We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: &quot:The NRCstaff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed, is dangerous and premature."




Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Mr. vein weller

Ms. Michele Lewis19123 Strathern StReseda, CA 91335-1125

Apr 24, 2013


Subject: Docket ID NRC20130070. My Comments to the NRC: Do Not Restart San Onofre Unit 2

Dear Cindy Bladey,







Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called &quot:licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.



Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Ms. Michele Lewis

Ms. Maryam MortezaiPO Box 4315West Hills, CA 91308-4315

Apr 25, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,




We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a&quot~preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.






Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Ms. Maryam Mortezai

Mr. Ross Heckmann1214 Valencia WayArcadia, CA 91006-2406

Apr 25, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,






We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10., 2013: "The NRCstaff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed, is dangerous and premature."




Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Mr. Ross Heckmann

Mr. Everett Gantz2508 E Willow StUnit 108Signal Hill, CA 90755-6302

Apr 25, 2013


Subject: Docket ID NRC20130070. My Comments to the NRC: Do Not Restart San Onof'e Unit 2

Dear Cindy Bladey,




We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a&quot:preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.






We are witnessing increasingly troubling evidence of assurances bypresumably well-qualified public utility experts in advance ofcatastrophic events. Fukushima, Japan is but one example. By the simpletest of comparing what we have to gain by allowing this evasion ofestablished regulations versus what we risk, all the evidence supportsdenying Southern California Edison's self-serving efforts.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Mr. Everett Gantz

Jane Feldman

Apr 25, 2013

Cindy BladeyUS. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-000 I


Dear Cindy Bladey,




We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staffdisregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a"preliminary finding&quot: that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.


We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10. 2013: "The N RCstaff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called &quot:Iicenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.



The San Onofre reactor is too dangerous to be put into operation.And there are so many good alternatives - efficiency and conservation,solar energy, wind energy, wave energy. THOSE are the teclmologies thatwe need to pursue.

Please don't continue the threat that San Onofre presents. Keep itshuttered.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Jane Feldman

pare nelson

Apr 25, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,




We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and amiounced a&quot~preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.


We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: &quot:The NRCstaff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed. is dangerous and premature."




Making funding available to promote distributed power would be a lotsmarter and safer way to spend our funds and subsidies.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.pam nelson

Ginger Mira5046 Loleta AveLos Angeles, CA 90041-23 15

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,








It's not a matter if IF these generators will leak, it's a matter ofWHEN.

Fukashima fall-out has drifted to California and is affecting our air,water, land and food. Do our children really need more nuclearradiation?


Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Ginger Mira

Catherune Venturini1855 Industrial St Apt 607Los Angeles, CA 9002 1-1260

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,






We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: &quot.The NRCstaff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed, is dangerous and premature."




Restarting San Onofre reactor would be INSANE.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Catherune Venturini

Armando H. Torres800 McGarrv StLos Angeles, CA 90021-1950

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey.





We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofi'eagenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.


Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called &quot:Iicenseamendment&quot" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.



we live in California, there are other alternative and natural sourcesof energy that are cleaner and safer. no to nuclear power plants!

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Armando H. Torres

Elizabeth Rudrigues1211 Avenida Buena SuerteSan Clemente., CA 92672-2349

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,







Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "Iicenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.



As I live close to the San Onofre plant I have been anxious and worriedabout any restart. It should be closed permanently. Please consider myrequest for a permanent shutdown.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Elizabeth Rudrigues

Jennie Jensen6106 Matilija AveVan Nuys, CA 91401-2920

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,







Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called &quot.licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.


I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.This plant needs to be shut down and we need to focus on clean energy.Nuclear energy is way to dangerous and produce terrible toxic waste.How can that be good??????

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Jennie Jensen

Laurie Buckley10823 Kling StN Hollywood, CA 91602-1488

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,






We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee. who stated on April 10, 2013: &quotrThe NRCstaff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofire nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed, is dangerous and premature.&quot:




The dangers of radiation are so severe, we cannot afford to jeopardizethe safety of the people and beyond. We are no good at storingradiation, the seas are rising, and it's deadly enough just by sittingthere.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Laurie Buckley

isa De Quesada16381 Laura WayWestminster, CA 92683-7809

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC2 0130070.





We support Senator Boxer. Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRCstaff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseanmendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.The dangers that this facility poses to the surrounding area are notjustifiable by any amount of profit that could be made.


Thank you for your attention to these concerns.isa De Quesada

Carol GlasheenPO Box 638San Clemente., CA 92674-0638

Apr26. 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,




We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and amlounced a"preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.


We support Senator Boxer. Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRCstaff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed, is dangerous and premature."




I live in San Clemente CA, just down the road from San Onofre, andthere is no way out in the event of a nuclear fallout. Even now,traffic is at a standstill on the freeway in some parts of SanClemente., 7 days of the week, at almost every hour of the day.

Please do not restart the nuclear power plant.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Carol Glasheen

Charles Wolfe13376 Dronfield AveSylmar, CA 91342-1401

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,




We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a"preliminary finding&quot, that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.



Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment&quot, that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.


I support the call by the Sierra Club and others for the NRC to blockany restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and toconduct a comprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Charles Wolfe

Jeffrey Agnew1092 Via CordovaSan Pedro, CA 90732-2303

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,






We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRCstaff proposal. which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed., is dangerous and premature.&quot:

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment&quot: that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.



With a daughter attending UC San Diego in the fall, this is an issue Itake even more seriously. We cannot afford the consequences of anaccident.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Jeffrey Agnew

Nicholas Sevilla

Northridge, CA 91325

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,










No More unnecessary Nuclear Plants. Never forget Fukushima, which todayis still spewing out uncontrolled levels of radiation.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Nicholas Sevilla

Rachel Matteson4246 Rutgers AveLong Beach, CA 90808-1628

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,








They have been saying for years that plant is safe that turned out tobe untrue they have an agenda... done open it early please..Given thetroubled history and current condition of the plant and the raisedlevel of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRCof conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of eitherfailed generator.


Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Rachel Matteson

Donna Williams6234 Afton PILos Angeles, CA 90028-8205

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC2O 130070.







The standard for operating any potentially life threatening equipmentis that it is in good working condition. The problem with nuclearplant failures is the lifespan of the damage far exceeds our own.Holding a "company" liable after the fact is a moot point.



Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Donna Williams

Betty Murphy35 Linden Ave Apt 310Long Beach, CA 90802-5059

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,








Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.WHY WOULD YOU EVEN TAKE A RISK????????

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive ..... and it must be COMPREHENSIVE... and OPEN reviewprocess.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Betty Murphy

Edward Dollard1801 Hackett AveLong Beach, CA 90815-3428

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket 1D NRC20130070.



We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a"preliminary finding&quot: that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.


We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRCstaff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed, is dangerous and premature.&quot:


"Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant andthe raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full reviewby the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

1 support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process."

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Edward Dollard

Willie Walker146 S Main StOrange. CA 92868-286 1

Apr 26. 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,







Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called &quot~licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.

I live near the impending nuclear disaster called. San Onofre. I'vevisited the plant many times over the years. We. the residents, worryconstantly about when the melt-down is going to happen. Given thetroubled history and current condition of the plant and the raisedlevel of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRCof conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of eitherfailed generator.


Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Willie Walker

Michaela Pond1400 Santanella TerCorona Del Mar, CA 92625-1743

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,










Those of us who live near San Onfre nuclear plant know we don't needthe plant and don't want it. It is a danger to us and our environment.We have watched as nuclear disasters have occurred throughout the worldand as our local sea life has died off as a result of the plant. Pleaseshut it down!

Thank you for your attention in this matter.

Sincerely

Michaela [email protected]

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Karen Chapman Lenz, Phd693 Parkwood LnPomona, CA 91767-1208

Apr 26, 2013


Subject: Docket ID NRC20130070. My Comments to the NRC: Do Not Restart San Onofie Unit 2

Dear Cindy Bladey,







Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called &quot-licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.



I remember when that place was built. And I am almost 74. Altho lessthan 74 1 know it is past retirement age. Let it retire. Rememberwhat happened in Japan.This place is surrounded by people. It would be a much biggerpopulation that would be nuked than at Fukushima! I live in Pomona andmillions live between me and San Onofre.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Karen Chapman Lenz, Phd

Jeanette Vosburg4124 East BlvdLos Angeles, CA 90066-4610

Apr 26, 2013


Sublect: Docket ID NRC20130070, My Comments to the NRC: Do Not Restart San Onofre Unit 2

Dear Cindy Bladey,








Solar, wind and geothermal offer safe, affordable options. Germany hadthe good sense, after the Japan nuclear disaster to close their plantspermanently. Let's do the same.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Jeanette Vosburg

Carol Lynn Prager10047 Genesta AveNorthridge, CA 91325-1622

Apr 26, 2013

Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-000 1

Subject: Docket iD NRC2O130070, My Comments to the NRC: Do Not Restart San Onofre Unit 2

Dear Cindy Bladey,






We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: &quot:The NRCstaff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed, is dangerous and premature.&quot:



I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process. The results of a failure wouldmean that I and my family would be at risk as well as hundreds ofthousands more who live in the Southern California area. We cannotaccept even the possibility of a failure. We live in one of thelargest earthquake zones in the world, and I would think that Japan'snuclear reactor story would give us pause about lowering any standardsin our own industry. We cannot risk public safety to give SCE a break.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Carol Lynn Prager

Penni and Timothy Dauwalder1568 Seneca PlClaremont, CA 91711-3338

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,






We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: &quot:The NRCstaff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofl'e nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called &quotlicenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.



Please listen to the publics safety concerns about starting failedgenerators aT San Onofre.Penni and Tim Dauwalder

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Penni and Timothy Dauwalder

Holly McDuffie11565 Erwin St Apt INorth Hollywood., CA 91606-4823

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,










San Onofre Nuclear Plant is another Fukushima waiting to happen, and weall know how THAT turned out. Are you intelligent, or not?

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Holly McDuffie

Terri KanaPO Box 291398Los Angeles, CA 90029-9398

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,



Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-trackrestart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S. Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urgingthe. NRC not to follow such a course.




Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment&quot. that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.

Enough of your DISREGARD for humanity and all life.



Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Terri Kana

Jeffrey Gothard24471 Jutewood PILake Forest, CA 92630-3833

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket I D NRC20130070.







I live in the area that would become devastated in the event of anuclear "accident" or "act of God" at the SONGSplant. I also own rental property that is even closer (in Dana Point).This directly affects me and my family.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator. It is situated on a beautiful beach.. .whycan't it be used as a tidal power generation plant or solar collectorsite? Ifa Solar Power Plant has a spill, all we get is a sunny day!!


Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Jeffrey Gothard

Reynaldo Salcedo1652 6th AveLos Angeles. CA 90019-6108

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,






We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRCstaff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed, is dangerous and prenmature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called &quotlicenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.



We the people and our environment deserved to be kept safe fromcontamination and Fat Cats filling they're pockets with Benjamin'swithout regard or accountability and safety of the population at large.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Reynaldo Salcedo

Marcia Lewis2550 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 35Torrance, CA 90505-77 17

Apr 26, 2013


Subject: Docket I D NRC20130070, My Comments to the NRC: Do Not Restart San Onofre Unit 2

Dear Cindy Bladey,










Please protect all citizens in this crucial matter by your support offurther comprehensive investigation and subsequent, thorough repair ofthe San Onofre facility. Thank you.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Marcia Lewis

Kelly Olsen21932 Drexel WayLake Forest, CA 92630-5995

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,










Since Japan I'm scared because I live 20 miles from San Onofre andwould be affected if an earthquake damaged the plant!!!

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Kelly Olsen

Deena Metzger20666 Callon DrTopanga, CA 90290-37 12

Apr 26, 2013


Subject: Docket ID NRC20130070, My Comments to the NRC: Do Not Restart San Onofie Unit 2

Dear Cindy Bladey,






We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRCstaff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed, is dangerous and premature.kquot;


It is absolutely necessary that we consider the current, apparentlyunsolvable troubles at Fukushima Daachi. The radiation is now movingtoward California. A congressional hearing as to how to deal with thecrises is being called. We cannot afford to ignore the dangers. InJapan, it has become clear that the company cannot deal with theproblem. Neither can the government. We are not confident that anyonecan. Let us not have a Fukushima here. The way San Onofre is set itup, it is a Fukushima waiting to happen. It is absolutely necessarythat there be a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre,that exactly meet everyone's concerns before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct afull, comprehensive and open review process. I also ask you to extendthe review process to international experts and advisors as a failedplant is no longer only a local issue.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Deena Metzger

Raceal Mcwhorter8609 De Soto Ave Apt 209Canoga Park, CA 91304-2839

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,







Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofl'e through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.



Californians deserve full assurance of safety, in light of our being inan earthquake area and age of the plant.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Raceal Mcwhorter

Matthew Emmer4143 Via MarinaMarina Del Rey, CA 90292-5303

Apr 26, 2013


Subject: Docket ID NRC2 0130070, My Comments to the NRC: Do Not Restart San Onof'e Unit 2

Dear Cindy Bladey,


We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear powerplant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and

independent expert testimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track

restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S. Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urgingthe NRC not to follow such a course.






Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Matthew Emmer

Bella Silverstein15620 Carrousel DrCanyon Country, CA 91387-4435

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,


We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear powerplant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and

independent expert testimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-trackrestart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S. Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging

the NRC not to follow such a course.



We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC

staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed, is dangerous and premature."


Please DO NOT reopen the San Onofre nuclear power plant. I live within

the danger zone; its radioactive waste will remain deadly forcenturies. What arrogance to think we can do what we want to futuregenerations. Enough. Given the troubled history and current conditionof the plant and the raised level of public concern, the publicdeserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before itconsiders a restart of either failed generator.


Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Bella Silverstein

Laurel Tucker676 W 9th StClaremont, CA 91711-3741

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,








Believe it or not, my husband and I both worked at SONGS back in the1980's. We enjoyed our jobs and our coworkers. We were treated welland were paid very well.

But even as we went there each day to work, I was always aware of thefact that we were exposing ourselves to the very real possibility ofdanger. "What if there was an earthquake or tidal wave rightnow?" "What if the Russians launch an attack on the WestCoast?" I worried about ourselves there at the plant, and for thenearby community of San Clemente - and farther. Who knew howfar-ranging the consequences could be?

But it didn't take any of these catastrophic events to set the stationon a course for closure. A leak within the plant was serious enough toshut it down. This only serves to illustrate how problematic nuclearenergy can be.

SCE understandably wants to get SONGS up and running again. But thereis too much at risk to fast track the approval. We've got to beabsolutely sure that the process has been thoroughly reviewed.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Laurel Tucker

Maggie Freed4652 Oak Grove CirLos Angeles, CA 90041-3114

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,









Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Maggie Freed

Richard Saretsky20720 E Walnut Canyon RdWalnut., CA 91789-4420

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,







Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called &quot~licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.

The San Onofre Nuclear power plant must not be re-started until andwhen it can be absolutely proven that the plant is safe and theequipment is properly installed and correctly manufactured without anydefects which can affect human health.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Richard Saretsky

Robin Deans10875 Portal DrLos Alamitos, CA 90720-2508

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,






We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: &quotjThe NRCstaff proposal, which could pavethe way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamnendment&quot: that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.



THE OVERALL RISKS OUTWEIGH THE REWARDS!

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Robin Deans

Marjorie Benet38 FilareIrvine, CA 92620-2527

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,










I live in Orange County. and I don't want to be blown to hell in themiddle of the night because some big corporation wants to get evenricher. Just say NO.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Marjorie Benet

Sylvia Halasz268 W Dryden St Apt 114Glendale, CA 91202-3722

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,










We do NOT need a second Fukushima right here in California!

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Sylvia Halasz

Virginia Morris5333 Abbott PILos Angeles, CA 90042-3301

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,







Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendmnent" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.



Please think long run on this issue!

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Virginia Morris

Virginia Morris5333 Abbott PILos Angeles, CA 90042-3301

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,










Please think long run on this issue!

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Virginia Morris

Madeleine Fisher-Kern162 S Orange DrLos Angeles, CA 90036-3013

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,







Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called &quot-licenseamendment&quot: that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.

This is about money not the safety of California citizens. Given thetroubled history and current condition of the plant and the raisedlevel of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRCof conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of eitherfailed generator.


Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Madeleine Fisher-Kern

Nancy Kingston25861 Marguerite Pkwy Apt 201Mission Viejo, CA 92692-3112

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,








Eight million people live within 50 miles of the San Onofre nuclearpower plant and I live 20 miles away. Given the troubled history andcurrent condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern,the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at SanOnofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club, Senator Boxer, and CongressmanMarkey for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofregenerators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open reviewprocess.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Nancy Kingston

Dale Mccart34 JacksonIrvine., CA 92620-3360

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,




We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a&quot.preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.






To many people live within 50 miles of this site for it to berestarted.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Dale Mccart

Thomas Rowe5832 Matilija AveValley Glen, CA 91401-4425

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,








Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator. I do not trust the operators of this plant!


Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Thomas Rowe

Wayne Enos Jr543 E Walnut AveEl Segundo, CA 90245-2454

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,








We still do not have a proper place to store this very dangerous andtoxic waste. There are many clean and safe power sources like theNuclear plant and ourlife giving star our Sun.(SOLAR)Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.


Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Wayne Enos Jr

Sherry Bauer14 Via Santa MariaSan Clemente, CA 92672-9416

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,






We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRCstaff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed, is dangerous and premature.&quot,

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water. speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called &quot:licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.


As a resident of San Clemente and Realtor, I know this nuclear powerplant is a huge concern. To restart this plant is a disaster waitingto happen. Please stand up for our rights as our elected official andshut down any action to restart San Onofre.


Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Sherry Bauer

Marissa Rubin2035 4th St Unit 103cSanta Monica. CA 90405-1144

Apr 26, 2013

Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington. DC 20555-0001


Dear Cindy Bladey,




We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and anmounced a"preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.


We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10. 2013: &quot:The NRCstaff proposal. which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed, is dangerous and premature."


Dear Ms. Cindy Bladey,

It would be .... A MAJOR BLUNDER to restart San Onofre.

The evidence points to the misguided judgement to do so.

I STRONGLY urge you not to approve of such an action, forthe benefit

of all who would surely, at some point, be disastrously

affected by

the outcome !!!!! Think Fukishima.

SINCERELY yours, Marissa Rubin, M.A., ATR

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Marissa Rubin

Gail Hookailo276 Temple AveLong Beach, CA 90803-5435

Apr 26, 2013

Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommnissionWashington, DC 20555-0001


Dear Cindy Bladey,


We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory' Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to a restart of tle San Onofre nuclear powerplant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation andindependent expert testimony.


We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a&quotpreliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.


We support Senator Boxer. Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRCstaff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed, is dangerous and premature.&quot:




As a mother, I am always concerned about the choices we make as a stateand a country with regards to our environment. Let's leave our planetin a better state for the generations to come.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Gail Hookailo

Ellen Mcrae32691 Carreterra DrSan Juan Capistrano, CA 92675-4303

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,




We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a"prelimninary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.





1 support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process. It is foolhardy to push thisold nuclear plant to a point where leaks or worse malfunctions coulddevelop. Thousands of people living in the area--including mymother--run a risk of their lives and property every day that antiqueruns.

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water,speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despiteevidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from theoperation of the deficient steam generators.

Please do not permit restarting any nuclear reactor at San Onofre.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Barry Nicholls2504 Alvord LnRedondo Beach, CA 90278-5321

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,



Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licensereview process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-trackrestart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S. Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urgingthe NRC not to follow such a course.


We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or fill power of the failed generator.


Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called &quot:licenseamendment&quot: that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.

We need to move away from nuclear and forward to renewables .1 knowentrenched energy concerns have squashed progress on this front butthis is California and we are enlightened when it comes to preservingour environment...



Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Barry Nicholls

J Eiser621 Brocton CtLong Beach, CA 90803-6339

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,






We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRCstaff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplantare completed, is dangerous and premature."



1 support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

HOW ABOUT MAKING THIS AN INTERNATIONAL LABORATORY FOR THE SAFEDISMANTLING OF SUCH OBSOLETE PLANTS AND THE SAFE REMOVAL AND DISPOSALOF THE WASTE?

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.J Eiser

Edward Tharp

Capistrano Beach, CA 92624

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,






We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: &quotThe NRCstaff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed, is dangerous and premature."




I am speaking on this matter since my family lives within the circlethat was issued iodine pills for this boondoggle.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Edward Tharp

Sherry MeddickPO Box 771Silverado. CA 92676-0771

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,







Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre thirough a so-called "licenseamendrnent&quot, that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.



The danger posed to the public is FAR greater than any potential"harm" to SCE. Stop this. Stop this now.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Sherry Meddick

Lisbeth Caccese13753 Wyandotte StVan Nuys. CA 91405-2616

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,






We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee. who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRCstaff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed, is dangerous and premature."


Just how stupid does the Nuclear Regulatory Commission think the peopleof California are to be fooled into thinking that ANY regulatory agencyat the Federsal level is doing anything for the "publicgood"? Looks like Southern California Edison has its ownapologists on the NRC to shove the San Onofre restart down our throats.Can't wait for the mushroom cloud to appear on the horizon &realize my own government did it to me!

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Lisbeth Caccese

Thomas Gillespie15272 Valeda DrLa Mirada, CA 90638-2440

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,




We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a&quot~preliminary finding&quot: that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.





It is my understanding, that the NRC never evaluated the changes thatwere made to update the tubing from Mitsibishi 2 yrs ago, whichreplaced the original tubing, which had survived for 20+yrs. The fact,that it failed in less than 2yrs, should indicate serious designproblems!

Secondly, there is no plan in place for major evacuations in case of aserious meltdown at San Onofre.

Considering SCE's & the NRC's history on this, I would give seriousconsideration to deactivating the plant.


Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Thomas Gillespie

Maureen Walsh300 Calle MiramarRedondo Beach. CA 90277-6373

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,







Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called &quot:licenseamendmnent" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.

NO RESTART FOR THE FAILED SAN ONOFRE GENERATORS!

Too many players in the nuclear industry have demonstrated that theyare operating in bad faith, and the NRC has been far too lenient withthese bad actors.



Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Maureen Walsh

Elaine Arellano14509 Kingsdale AveLawndale, CA 90260-1346

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,








Considering the troubled history and current condition of the plantalong with raised levels of concern, the public deserves an indepthreview by the NRC of these serious conditions at San Onofre before itconsiders a restart of either of the failed generators.


Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Elaine Arellano

M. Epstein218 S Martel AveLos Angeles, CA 90036-2712

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,




We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and anmounced a"preliminary finding&quot, that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofregenerators is essential before the NRC considers any, potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.



San Onofre is a proven hazard to our heath.

It is unacceptable to consider restarting this (literal) hot mess.



Thank you for your attention to these concerns.M. Epstein

Alison Zukovsky

Los Angeles, CA 90016-1515

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,










Southern California has numerous other options for electric power thatactually is clean and safe why should life be endangered for theprofits of a few old men?Sorry to not have any compassion for your wealth needs but there's toomuch at stake.Socal Edison profiteers, clean up your act!

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Alison Zukovsky

Richard Cook8071 Sail CirHuntington Beach, CA 92646-5032

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,








No 'shortcuts' for Edison!



Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Richard Cook

B Adjemian23673 Sandalwood StWest Hills. CA 91307-1332

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,







Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseanmendment&quot: that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.



Also, after the Fukishima disaster in Japan, it needs to be noted thatSan Onofre is on the coast in a relatively active earthquake zone. Inaddition, the area around it is being built up so any incident at thatplant is more likely to affect both of the two major metropolitan areasof Los Angeles and San Diego than when it was first built.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.B Adjemian

Stephen Anderson9585 Toucan AveFountain Valley, CA 92708-5833

Apr 26, 2013


Subject: Docket ID NRC20130070, My Comments to the NRC: Do Not Restart Sail Onofre Unit 2

Dear Cindy Bladey,




We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a&quot-preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.


We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRCstaff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed, is dangerous and premature.&quot,


I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process. I live only a short distancefrom the plant and until all the problems were revealed a few yearsago, I was not aware that they had operating issues. I don't want themto operate again until they have a high level of confidence that theequipment will function safely.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Stephen Anderson

Judith Phillips1504 Carmelita StLaguna Beach, CA 92651-3359

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,




We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a&quotpreliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.






Please consider the devastating results if anything goes wrong at thisfacility. You have an obligation first to the people of this area andto the people of California, not to the San Onofre nuclear power plant.Please exercise that position.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Judith Phillips

Holly Church12963 Runway Rd Apt 321Playa Vista, CA 90094-2401

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,






We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee. who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRCstaff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed, is dangerous and premature."




I have lots of family members who live near there and I would like tokeep them all safe!

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Holly Church

Chris And Rhoda Holabird2244 Beverly Glen PILos Angeles. CA 90077-2506

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,








Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the

raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.

As a parent and grandparent with our family living in SouthernCalifornia, I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to blockany restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and toconduct a comprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Chris And Rhoda Holabird

K Higgins14281 Prospect AveTustin, CA 92780-2316

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,









For now we support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block anyrestart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and toconduct a comprehensive and open review process.

We support CLOSING the San Onofre facility.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.K Higgins

Angeles Chapter

Apr 26, 2013


Subject: Docket ID NRC20130070, My Comments to the NRC: Do Not Restart San Onofire Unit 2

Dear Cindy Bladey,




We were deeply disturbed when on April 10the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a"preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.


We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee. who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRCstaff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed, is dangerous and premature.&quot:


The public deserves a full review of conditions at San Onofre beforeeven considering starting it up again. Anything less would beirresponsible.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Angeles Chapter

Colleen Jorde37 New York CtDana Point., CA 92629-4524

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,










My children and grandchildren all live within a one mile radius of eachother and we are the people close enough to the San Onofre facilitythat regularly receive iodine tablets every few years in case of anuclear disaster. Think Japan last year ......... this REALLY scares meand I am in total disbelief that this restart of the nuclear plant iseven being considered!!!!!

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Colleen Jorde

Albert Nault

Irvine, CA

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,










Don't sacrifice the safety of those living in Southern California andsurrounding areas to the financial demands of Southern CaliforniaEdison.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Albert Nault

Inguna Galvina3929 Fountain AveLos Angeles, CA 90029-2217

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,








Please, do not restart! Given the troubled history and currentcondition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, thepublic deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofrebefore it considers a restart of either failed generator.


Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Inguna Galvina

Bruce Purdum2146 E Avenue Q5

Palmdale, CA 93550-403 I

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,










Any activity that has the significant potential of serious damage topublic health and saftey should be subject to prior approval of thepublic affected.As it stands, this project does not have the approval and consent ofme, my family, or any of my friends and neighbors.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Bruce Purdum

Robert Miller5 Matinee CtAliso Viejo, CA 92656-2853

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,







Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendinent" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.



I live 10 miles from San Onofre and I am VERY concerned. I do NOTtrust the operators at all. ALL they care about is profits, NOT mySafety.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Robert Miller

Amber Vasquez288 N Sierra Madre BlvdPasadena, CA 91107-3353

Apr 26, 2013


SubLect: Docket ID NRC20130070, My Comments to the NRC: Do Not Restart San Onofre Unit 2

Dear Cindy Bladey,










There is cause for concern whenever any agency or entity whoseoperations could have a potentially devastating effect on thesurrounding population attempts to circumvent the procedures in placefor its review. I believe the public deserves the opportunity for afull investigation and review.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Amber Vasquez

Barbara BlundellArlington AveTorrance, CA 90501

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,










San Onofre should be shut down permanently -- it's an accident waitingto happen --like another earthquake/Fukushima!

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Barbara Blundell

Peter McdonaldN Catalina StLos Angeles, CA 90027

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,









I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process. PLEASE for this generation, andthose that, God-willing will follow close-down San Onofre. NO!Fukishima in Orange County!

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Peter Mcdonald

Bill Tuohy3420 Calle Azul Unit leLaguna Woods, CA 92637-2851

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,










Why wait until disaster strikes? Take preventive action now ratherthan have to regret not having done so later.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Bill Tuohy

Josephine Viscito171 S Bayberry CtAnaheim, CA 92807-4019

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,








I do not want San Onofre started up even for a moment!Anyone who allows this will not ever have my vote in the future orhundreds of thousands of other votes!



Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Josephine Viscito

Cloudia Wintermute2377 W Avenue 33Los Angeles, CA 90065-2715

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,








This is way too important for the residents in Southern California toeven consider letting San Onofre have whatever they want with out afull reveiw. Given the troubled history and current condition of theplant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves afull review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considersa restart of either failed generator.


Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Cloudia Wintermute

Melvin Kong2240 Pacific Ave # ACosta Mesa, CA 92627-3914

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,






We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 20 13: "The NRCstaff proposal. which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed, is dangerous and premature."


This Plant Needs To Be Retired!!

This facility is over 25 years old and has outlived it's lifespan ofsafety. What kind of madness is it to operate it at only 70% ofcapacity. This should be a RED FLAG automatically as to it's safety.Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and theraised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review bythe NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart ofeither failed generator.


Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Melvin Kong

Robert And Mariann Keenan23392 BolivarMission Viejo, CA 92691-2205

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,









We support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Robert And Mariann Keenan

Gloria Bram12091 Sapphire StGarden Grove, CA 92845-1825

Apr 26, 2013

Cindy BladeyU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington., DC 20555-0001

Subject: Docket ID NRC20130070., My Comments to the NRC: Do Not Restart San Onofre Unit 2

Dear Cindy Bladey,


We ask that theNuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear powerplant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation andindependent expert testimony.








These rules & regulations were put in place to protect humanity andthe environment. Please don't circumvent the full license reviewprocess by allowing this "license amendment" which is NOTpart of the true process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Gloria Bram

Angeles Chapter

Apr 26. 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,










Please think clearly for our future and that of our children.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Angeles Chapter

Linda Nicholas23515 Lyons Ave Unit 206Valencia, CA 91355-6204

Apr 26. 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,








No No No. Please. Given the troubled history and current condition ofthe plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves afull review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considersa restart of either failed generator.


Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Linda Nicholas

Terrence Mcnally2580 Roscornare RdLos Angeles, CA 90077-1815

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,








The public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at SanOnofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator. Isupport the call to block any restart of the failed San Onofregenerators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open reviewprocess.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Terrence Mcnally

Derek Iversen6249 Whitsett AveNorth Hollywood, CA 91606-3129

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,








There's just no good or compelling reason to go nuclear, when we havebetter alternatives. We have untapped solar, wind and geothermalresources in plentiful supply in California. Let's tap into thoseinstead, and spare ourselves the agony of a Fukushima-Daiichi typemeltdown here that simply does not have to happen.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Derek Iversen

John Price11439 Ruffner AveGranada Hills, CA 91344-3643

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,




We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a&quot~prelim inary finding&quot, that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.





Thank you for your attention to these concerns.John Price

William Messenger5204 Tierra Encanta DrWhittier, CA 90601-2247

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,








There has never been a better time to admit that we cannot controlnuclear power plants. From previous disasters in the U.S. to Russia, toJapan, it is clear that this source of energy is an illusion.



Thank you for your attention to these concerns.William Messenger

Robert & Claire Heron10941 Sproul AveLos Angeles, CA 90064-4060

Apr 26, 2013


Subject: Docket ID NRC20130070, My Comments to tile NRC: Do Not Restart San Onofre Unit 2

Dear Cindy Bladey,










I've been following this issue since the 1970s when we were promisedthat "the industry" would solve the radioactive wasteproblem. They have not done so and I have seen nothing to demonstratethat they have made any progress whatsoever in that direction after 40years!

It is simply to dangerous to continue creating all of the dangerouswaste and now it the time to stop.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Robert & Claire Heron

Carolyn Olney4924 Argus DrLos Angeles, CA 90041-2121

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,








The situation at San Onofre is quite troubling. The public deserves afull review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considersa restart of either failed generator.


Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Carolyn Olney

!! Emery

CA 90016-5205

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,








STOP !!! Given the troubled history and current condition of the plantand the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a fullreview by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers arestart of either failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to BLOCK ANY RESTARTof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct aCOMPREHENSIVE AND OPEN review process.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.P Emery

Young Mi Chi2205 Sally CtWest Covina, CA 91792-2418

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,








Transparency is necessary where lives are at stake--do we really wantthe disasters of Fukushima to be repeated here? We can't affordopacity. Please all full review by an objective entity.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Young Mi Chi

Victoria Maturo4241 Baldwin AveCulver City, CA 90232-3201

Apr 26, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,









I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process. We must do everything that wecan to protect human health, the environment and animals.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Victoria Maturo

Jeffrey Upton12532 La Bella DrSanta Ana, CA 92705-3407

May 1,2013


Subject: Docket I D NRC20130070, My Comments to the NRC: Do Not Restart San Onofre Unit 2

Dear Cindy Bladey,







Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendnient" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.



We don't need a Fukushima here in California

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Jeffrey Upton

Cynthia Manley

CA 90032

May 1, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,










We need to be creating GREEN power, instead of destroying the planetfor future generations, while killing of this one, with variouscancers.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Cynthia Manley

cort stricker

May 1, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,




We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a&quot~preliminary finding&quot, that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.


We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: &quotThe NRCstaff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed, is dangerous and premnature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendnment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steani generators.



Sincerely,

Cort Stricker

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.cort stricker

stuart walker

CA

May 1, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,







Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendrnent&quot: that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.


I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restartof the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct acomprehensive and open review process. Thank You, Please thank You

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.stuart walker

Laurel Tucker676 W 9th StClaremont, CA 91711-3741

May 1, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,




We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and anmounced a"preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.




My husband and I both worked at SONGS back in the '80's. It was a goodplace to work but always felt a bit dangerous.



Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Laurel Tucker

robert keenan

CA 92691-2205

May 1, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,








No shortcuts! We live close enough that any nuclear incident wouldreduce the value of our home and tens of thousands of our neighbors'homes.



Thank you for your attention to these concerns.robert keenan

dean campbell3553a Atlantic Ave # 116Long Beach, CA 90807-4515

May 2, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,







Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "licenseamendment&quot, that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was madedespite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.

I am a Voting Senior and all my friends are Voting Seniors. Given thetroubled history and current condition of the plant and the raisedlevel of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRCof conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of eitherfailed generator.


Thank you for your attention to these concerns.dean campbell

rosemary Muniz10956 Stonehenge PIRiverside, CA 92503-5929

May 3, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,



Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-trackrestart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S. Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging

the NRC not to follow such a course.







Rosemary Muniz10956 stonehenge placeriverside, ca 92503

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.rosemary Muniz

W K Grady5123 Raphael StLos Angeles, CA 90042-3234

May 3, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,






We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: &quotzThe NRCstaff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippledplant are completed, is dangerous and premature."


We are vigorously opposed to using the power of an atomic bomb to boilwater.


Thank you for your attention to these concerns.W K Grady

Myrna Spear

May 6, 2013



Dear Cindy Bladey,










Further, after hearing both sides of the issue recently, I am againstthe restart of the San Onofre Nuclear plant for ANY length of time asit is unsafe and can cause instant death and rampant cancers tomillions of Southern Californians.

Thank you for your attention to these concerns.Myrna Spear

Date post:	20-Jan-2021
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	1 times
Download:	0 times

Mr. Terry Welsh Costa Mesa, CA 92626-2306Mr. Terry Welsh 3086 Ceylon Rd Costa Mesa, CA 92626-2306...

Documents