Date post: | 02-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | candace-nicholson |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 1 times |
mRNA EXPRESSION OF APOPTOTIC MARKERS AND ANTIOXIDANT ENZYMES IN CUMULUS AND GRANUOLSE CELLS FROM PERIOVULATORY
FOLLICLES OF YOUNG WOMEN WITH LOW OVARIAN RESERVE
R. NUÑEZ-CALONGE1, S.CORTES1, L.RANCAN2, E.VARA2, L.ORTEGA1, P.CABALLERO1, J.FERNANDEZ-TRESGUERRES2.
1 Clínica Tambre, Madrid , SPAIN2 Dpto. Fisiología, Universidad Complutense Madrid
Introduction
Introduction
Objective
To investigate apoptosis and oxidative stress in granulose (GC) and cumulus cells (CC) from periovulatory follicles of young women with low response to COH. To this end, we compared the levels of mRNA coding for antioxidant enzymes and apoptotic markers in women with low response in in vitro fertilization (IVF) and fertile oocyte donors as controls.
Methods
20 healthy,
fertile, Donors(< 35 years old)
15 low responders
Patients(< 35 years old)
COS
rFSH+ antagonist GnRH
Patients enrolled in this study were selected on the basis of their ovarian response (with normal FSH and/or AMH levels) and only patients with at least a previous cycle with low response were included.
Methods
Superoxide dismutase (SOD) Catalase Antioxidant enzymes
Caspase 3 and Caspase 9 Bcl-2 Apoptotic markers BAX
We carried out RT-PCR analysis on CGs and CCs from pooled follicular aspirates of each pacient:
Results
Results
Mean ± SD Donors Patients P value
Catalase 1,47±0,11 0,87±0,06 .005
SOD 1,55±0,07 1,42±0,02 NS
Caspase 3 0,34 ±0,01 0,71±0,049 .0006
Caspase 9 0,81±0,06 1,37±0,1 .009
BAX 1,19±0,02 2,11±0,2 .0018
Bcl2 1,02±0,02 1,46±0,09 .006
Levels of mRNA coding for antioxidant enzymes and apoptotic markers in GCs of low responders patients compared with controls.
Results
Mean ± SD Donors Patients P value
Catalase 1,66±0,14 0,99±0,06 .0037
SOD 1,19±0,07 1,2±0,1 NS
Caspase 3 1,008 ±0,12 1,01±0,006 NS
Caspase 9 1,05±0,06 1,1±0,07 NS
BAX 1,26±0,06 2,95±0,19 0.08
Bcl2 1,35±0,05 1,37±0,03 NS
Levels of mRNA coding for antioxidant enzymes and apoptotic markers in CCs of low responders patients compared with controls.
Results
Cat
alas
e m
RN
A (
Arb
itra
ry U
nit
s)
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
DP
CC
*
*p<0,01
p<0.01
Catalase mRNA expression levels in cumulus and granulosa cells from donors and patients. Values are means ± SEM
Cat
alas
e m
RN
A (
Arb
itra
ry U
nit
s)
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
DP
CG
*
*p<0,01
p<0.01
Results
BA
X m
RN
A (
Arb
itra
ry U
nit
s)
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
2,5
DP
CG
*
*p<0,01
p<0.01
BAX mRNA expression levels in cumulus and granulosa cells from donors and patients. Values are means ± SEM
BA
X m
RN
A (
Arb
itra
ry U
nit
s)
0
1
2
3
4
DP
CC
*
*p<0,01
p<0.01
Conclusions
• Our results suggest a lower antioxidant capacity and an increased apoptosis level in CC and GC of women with low response to COH compared with fertile oocyte donors.
• Otherwise, mRNAs coding for antioxidant enzymes and apoptotic markers are differentially expressed in granulose and cumulus cells.
• In addition, in this study, we demonstrate a significant difference between women with poor and normal responses to COH and we found there were a good correlation between increased GCs oxidative stress, apoptosis and low ovarian response, suggesting that oxidative stress could influence oocyte production.
Conclusions
• The relations of some antioxidant enzymes like SOD, and
apoptotic markers in CC with OE and its implication in ovarian reserve needs to be addressed in further studies on a larger sample.
• Identifying optimal biomarkers that reliably predict ovarian response in the clinical setting could lead to developing antioxidant therapies for these poorer prognosis women undergoing IVF treatment.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTIONTHANK YOU FOR
YOUR ATTENTION