Date post: | 14-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | gillian-fender |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
MSIP 5
Becky OdnealOctober 27, 2011
Education Link Consulting 2
Background on MSIP 5 Rule2007-2009, first MSIP 5March 2011, MSIP 5 rule approved by the SBEApril 15, 2011 public comment period began
Substantial concerns were raised by educators across the state
May 2011, rule withdrawn by DESE MSIP 5 Steering Committee MSIP 5 Regional Advisory Committees
August 16, 2011, MSIP 5 Rule approved by SBEOctober 3-November 2, Public Comment Period
Education Link Consulting 3
RAC - Draft Consensus PointsContinue career/technical education opportunitiesReduce number of summative assessmentsRecognize the importance of formative assessmentsUse ACT instead of EOC/EOHS assessmentsMaintain resource and process standardsEliminate “report only” measures from APREnsure that the system acknowledges the needs of
the exceptional pupilEstablish benchmarks along the pre K through 12 ‐
continuum
Education Link Consulting 4
MSIP 5 Recommendations1. Direct the Department to bring to the State Board of Education a new rule to update process and resource standards by August 2012. The process should: • Start with the recommendations previously
developed by the committee convened in 2008-09; • Consider current research and best practices; and • Include stakeholders. 2. Direct the Department to work with stakeholders and technical experts to develop state standards and a scoring guide for calculating proficiency on the revised MSIP 5 standards.
Education Link Consulting 5
MSIP 5 Recommendations3. Approve the revised assessment plan as recommended, with the understanding that full implementation will be dependent on state funding and the work of the SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium.
4. Authorize the publication of a notice of proposed rulemaking to adopt Rule 5 CSR 50-345.1054, relating to Missouri School Improvement Program 5 in the Missouri Register and that the State Board of Education finds this proposed rule necessary to carry out the purposes of Sections 161.092, 162.081. 167.131, and 168.081 RSMo.
Education Link Consulting 6
Recommendation 3. Assessment Plan
Pre-K through Grade 2 Assessments Developed in 11-12, piloted in 12-13,
operational in 13-14EOC Assessments
Phase-in planEOHS Assessments
SMARTER Balanced ConsortiumSocial Studies, Fine Arts and PE Assessments
Education Link Consulting 7
Assessment Plan
Education Link Consulting 8
Assessment Plan ConcernsPre-K through Grade 2, lack of informationEOC and EOHS assessments still require
students to take the same courses as previous plan in order to be proficient in competencies
Additional assessments still require additional technological resources for school districts
Required course-taking patterns limit opportunities for students to participate in more beneficial programs, such as career ed
Potential for EOHS assessments to become exit exams and career and college placement tools
Education Link Consulting 9
Recommendation 4. Rule(1) Pursuant to section 161.092, RSMo, this rule is to be effective two (2) years from the date of adoption of the proposed rule by the State Board of Education (board). The Missouri School Improvement Program (MSIP) – 5 Performance Standards and Indicators, Appendix A, included herein, is comprised of quantitative standards for school districts. MSIP–5 Process Standards and Indicators will include evidence of adequate instruction in physical education and fine arts to be included in standards used to determine classification.
Education Link Consulting 10
Recommendation 4. Rule(3) The board will assign classification designations of unaccredited, provisionally accredited, accredited, and accredited with distinction based on the standards of the MSIP.
Education Link Consulting 11
Recommendation 4. RuleAPPENDIX A3. College and Career Readiness 2.The district’s average composite score(s) on any department-approved measure(s) of college and career readiness, for example, the ACT®, SAT®, COMPASS®, or ASVAB, meet(s) or exceed(s) the state standard or demonstrate(s) required improvement. 3. The percent of graduates who participated in any department-approved measure(s) of college and career readiness, for example, the ACT®, SAT®, COMPASS®, or ASVAB, meets or exceeds the state standard or demonstrates required improvement.
Education Link Consulting 12
Recommendation 4. Rule3. College and Career Readiness6. The percent of graduates who complete career education programs approved by the department and are placed in occupations directly related to their training, continue their education, or are in the military within six (6) months of graduating meets the state standard or demonstrates required improvement.
Education Link Consulting 13
Potential Implications…Emphasis is entirely on “college graduation”
and does not recognize programs for which students receive training in high school and enter higher wage-earning careers
Assessments change course-taking patterns and eliminate the opportunity for students to take career education courses which are proven to help prevent at-risk students from dropping out of school and prepare all students for higher wage-earning careers
Education Link Consulting 14
Competencies cannot be embedded into career education programs, as suggested by DESE
Districts may be forced to replace career education teachers with additional CORE teachers in order for students to be taught the competencies needed to score Proficient on state assessments
Potential Implications…
Education Link Consulting 15
Potential Implications for StudentsStudents will lose the opportunity to explore careers
before entering collegeStudents will lose the opportunity to become trained
in skills that will allow them to earn higher wages in career after high school and/or during college
Students will lose the opportunity to learn essential skills that will help them in many facets of life
Many students will drop out of high school because they will not have the opportunity to participate in programs that keep them engaged in high school and teach them hands-on skills that will help them succeed after graduation
Education Link Consulting 16
Overall IssuesAlignment with federal accountability initiativesTop 10 by 2020 = NCLB’s 100% Proficiency by 2014Scoring Guide methodology “state standard” and
growth model (75% Proficiency, 100% Grad Rate)Potential NCLB Waiver
Education Link Consulting 17
Scoring Guide/NCLB WaiverOctober-December, Steering CommitteeOctober 25-26, Public Input/Regional Advisory
Committee MeetingsNovember, Indicator/Model Selection
Committee (30 member advisory committee)
November-December, Standard Setting Methodology (10-member TAC)
January, scoring guide to State BoardJanuary-June, pilot scoring guideFebruary, NCLB Waiver application due
Education Link Consulting 18
Scoring GuideGoals
Identify and work with lowest 5% Ensure all schools are “good enough” Ensure all schools get better
Design Decisions Status vs. Growth Differentiated vs. Standardized Accountability Simple/Transparent vs. Complex/Precise Resources - Focused vs. “Spread Across All
Districts”
Education Link Consulting 19
Waiver ConcernsMSIP 5 goes into effect immediatelyConditions of waiverSchool-level implementationLoss of state flexibilityPotential reauthorizationUnknown “sticks”
Education Link Consulting 20
Next StepsOctober 3 – November 2, public comment
periodRule goes in to effect in 2013Inform other stakeholdersRespond during public comment periodActively participate in Regional Advisory
Committees Scoring Guide Resource and Process Standards
NCLB Waiver
Education Link Consulting 21
Questions?