+ All Categories
Home > Documents > MSP data

MSP data

Date post: 21-Dec-2014
Category:
Upload: cincodelgado
View: 665 times
Download: 4 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Preliminary work By Dr. Jack about 2010 MSP Data
14
Spring 2010 State Assessment & AYP Results Jack B. Monpas-Huber, Ph.D. Director of Assessment and Student Information
Transcript
Page 1: MSP data

Spring 2010 State Assessment & AYP Results

Jack B. Monpas-Huber, Ph.D.Director of Assessment and Student Information

Page 2: MSP data

State Assessment Results

Two-Year Change in Proficiency, 2009 to 2010, District

Grade 2009 2010 Change 2009 2010 Change 2009 2010 Change 2009 2010 Change

3 81.6 79.6 -2.0 77.2 67.0 -10.24 82.7 78.5 -4.2 68.0 69.0 1.0 68.1 63.0 -5.15 81.3 82.0 0.7 69.8 67.1 -2.7 59.1 48.1 -11.06 82.3 75.7 -6.6 65.0 68.8 3.87 79.5 71.8 -7.7 81.9 77.7 -4.2 71.4 68.2 -3.28 85.0 81.8 -3.2 68.4 70.9 2.5 66.6 73.7 7.110 85.7 86.6 0.9 90.4 86.2 -4.2 58.8 51.3 -7.5 50.2 57.8 7.6

10 w/PP 86.9 86.9 0.0 91.1 86.6 -4.5 61.3 51.7 -9.6 50.4 57.8 7.4

*PP = includes the scores of students who previously passed from a prior administration

Reading Writing Math Science

Page 3: MSP data

State Assessment ResultsTwo-Year Change in Proficiency, 2009 to 2010, Secondary

Change in Proficiency Rates, 2009 and 2010, by Content Area, Grade Level, and Secondary School

Content School 2009 2010 Change 2009 2010 Change 2009 2010 Change 2009 2010 ChangeReading DISTRICT 79.5 71.8 -7.7 85.0 81.8 -3.2 85.7 86.6 0.9 86.9 86.9 0.0

Einstein 79.5 73.2 -6.3 81.2 81.6 0.4Kellogg 81.3 70.6 -10.7 90.8 81.8 -9.0Room Nine 58.3 77.8 19.5 81.3 100.0 18.7Shorecrest 86.9 89.8 2.9 87.6 89.9 2.3Shorewood 85.5 84.1 -1.4 87.1 84.5 -2.6

Math DISTRICT 71.4 68.2 -3.2 68.4 70.9 2.5 58.8 51.3 -7.5 61.3 51.7 -9.6Einstein 70.7 70.0 -0.7 64.9 74.6 9.7Kellogg 73.0 66.8 -6.2 73.6 67.0 -6.6Room Nine 66.7 88.9 22.2 56.3 57.1 0.8Shorecrest 56.5 51.2 -5.3 58.3 51.6 -6.7Shorewood 61.7 51.9 -9.8 64.7 52.1 -12.6

Writing DISTRICT 81.9 77.7 -4.2 90.4 86.2 -4.2 91.1 86.6 -4.5Einstein 79.0 78.3 -0.7Kellogg 86.9 78.0 -8.9Room Nine 75.0 77.8 2.8Shorecrest 91.9 88.7 -3.2 92.4 89.0 -3.4Shorewood 89.4 84.1 -5.3 90.4 84.7 -5.7

Science DISTRICT 66.6 73.7 7.1 50.2 57.8 7.6 50.4 57.8 7.4Einstein 63.9 76.5 12.6Kellogg 70.0 71.0 1.0Room Nine 80.0 57.1 -22.9Shorecrest 46.6 61.2 14.6 46.6 61.2 14.6Shorewood 54.1 54.8 0.7 54.3 54.8 0.5

Note. Values are percents of students meeting or exceeding standard. PP = includes the scores of students who previously passed from a prior administration

7 8 10 10 w/PP*

Page 4: MSP data

State Assessment ResultsTwo-Year Change in Proficiency, 2009 to 2010, Elementary

Change in Proficiency Rates, 2009 and 2010, by Content Area, Grade Level, and Elementary School

Content School 2009 2010 Change 2009 2010 Change 2009 2010 Change 2009 2010 Change

Reading DISTRICT 81.6 79.6 -2.0 82.7 78.5 -4.2 81.3 82.0 0.7 82.3 75.7 -6.6

Briarcrest 84.1 73.8 -10.3 74.6 66.2 -8.4 81.0 74.5 -6.5 75.0 73.0 -2.0

Brookside 91.7 85.7 -6.0 86.5 85.9 -0.6 87.4 85.7 -1.7 91.0 77.4 -13.6

Echo Lake 77.5 78.5 1.0 81.9 77.9 -4.0 65.7 77.5 11.8 83.6 55.2 -28.4

Highland Terrace 85.7 83.9 -1.8 90.0 85.5 -4.5 88.7 92.2 3.5 78.9 81.3 2.4

Lake Forest Park 75.0 69.6 -5.4 85.1 82.1 -3.0 78.8 78.3 -0.5 83.1 76.8 -6.3

Meridian Park 89.7 79.7 -10.0 91.1 84.1 -7.0 80.5 89.9 9.4 80.6 85.2 4.6

Parkwood 85.0 83.8 -1.2 78.2 79.7 1.5 73.9 83.3 9.4 75.0 86.0 11.0

Ridgecrest 72.5 82.3 9.8 79.5 74.7 -4.8 88.9 77.3 -11.6 97.1 76.9 -20.2

Room Nine 64.3 56.3 -8.0 82.6 50.0 -32.6 72.7 75.0 2.3 89.5 58.3 -31.2

Syre 87.3 84.7 -2.6 85.7 85.7 0.0 88.7 84.4 -4.3 81.4 77.5 -3.9

Math DISTRICT 77.2 67.0 -10.2 68.1 63.0 -5.1 69.8 67.1 -2.7 65.0 68.8 3.8

Briarcrest 75.4 46.8 -28.6 49.2 39.0 -10.2 70.7 70.9 0.2 45.1 61.9 16.8

Brookside 83.3 87.0 3.7 72.6 82.1 9.5 78.9 71.4 -7.5 77.6 75.5 -2.1

Echo Lake 75.3 65.2 -10.1 63.5 62.8 -0.7 44.4 62.2 17.8 66.7 54.3 -12.4

Highland Terrace 77.8 83.9 6.1 70.0 80.6 10.6 82.3 68.6 -13.7 71.9 84.6 12.7

Lake Forest Park 75.0 44.6 -30.4 68.7 64.7 -4.0 75.0 62.9 -12.1 66.2 78.6 12.4

Meridian Park 85.9 73.0 -12.9 74.7 62.2 -12.5 75.3 78.5 3.2 70.9 75.3 4.4

Parkwood 85.2 73.5 -11.7 78.2 67.8 -10.4 62.2 51.9 -10.3 58.3 65.1 6.8

Ridgecrest 72.5 60.8 -11.7 57.8 51.8 -6.0 71.6 68.2 -3.4 75.4 66.7 -8.7

Room Nine 53.8 43.8 -10.0 78.3 57.1 -21.2 27.3 58.3 31.0 68.4 33.3 -35.1

Syre 76.2 72.2 -4.0 87.3 67.9 -19.4 75.7 70.3 -5.4 58.0 64.8 6.8

Writing DISTRICT 68.0 69.0 1.0

Briarcrest 69.8 66.2 -3.6

Brookside 72.6 74.4 1.8

Echo Lake 55.6 71.4 15.8

Highland Terrace 64.0 83.9 19.9

Lake Forest Park 67.2 50.0 -17.2

Meridian Park 77.2 67.1 -10.1

Parkwood 67.3 75.9 8.6

Ridgecrest 62.7 63.4 0.7

Room Nine 47.8 42.9 -4.9

Syre 92.2 87.5 -4.7

Science DISTRICT 59.1 48.1 -11.0

Briarcrest 60.3 46.4 -13.9

Brookside 84.2 64.3 -19.9

Echo Lake 24.3 28.2 3.9

Highland Terrace 70.0 41.2 -28.8

Lake Forest Park 48.1 42.0 -6.1

Meridian Park 54.5 69.6 15.1

Parkwood 65.2 44.4 -20.8

Ridgecrest 69.1 43.2 -25.9

Room Nine 27.3 33.3 6.0Syre 59.4 53.1 -6.3

Note. Values are percents of students meeting or exceeding standard.

3 4 5 6

Page 5: MSP data

SHORELINE SCHOOL DISTRICT% of Students Meeting or Exceeding Standard

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8Grade 10

State Assessment Performance Trends in READING

Source: OSPI Report Card (http://reportcard.ospi.k12.wa.us)

Page 6: MSP data

SHORELINE SCHOOL DISTRICT% of Students Meeting or Exceeding Standard

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Grade 4Grade 7Grade 10

State Assessment Performance Trends in WRITING

Source: OSPI Report Card (http://reportcard.ospi.k12.wa.us)

Page 7: MSP data

SHORELINE SCHOOL DISTRICT% of Students Meeting or Exceeding Standard

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8Grade 10

State Assessment Performance Trends in MATHEMATICS

Source: OSPI Report Card (http://reportcard.ospi.k12.wa.us)

Page 8: MSP data

SHORELINE SCHOOL DISTRICT% of Students Meeting or Exceeding Standard

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Grade 5Grade 8Grade 10

State Assessment Performance Trends in SCIENCE

Source: OSPI Report Card (http://reportcard.ospi.k12.wa.us)

Page 9: MSP data

AYP - Elementary State Uniform Bar (Grades 3-5)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Reading Math

76.1

64.9

88.1

82.4

100.0

SOURCE: OSPI (http://www.k12.wa.us/ESEA/AdequateYearlyProgress.aspx)

Page 10: MSP data

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Reading Math

65.1

58.7

82.5

79.3

SOURCE: OSPI (http://www.k12.wa.us/ESEA/AdequateYearlyProgress.aspx)

AYP - Middle School State Uniform Bar (Grades 6 - 8)

Page 11: MSP data

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Reading Math

74.3

62.4

87.2

81.2

SOURCE: OSPI (http://www.k12.wa.us/ESEA/AdequateYearlyProgress.aspx)

AYP - High School State Uniform Bar

Page 12: MSP data

Shoreline History of AYP

ORGANIZATION Title I 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

DISTRICT 7 2 8 7 9Briarcrest YBrookside 1Echo Lake Y 1 2Highland Terrace Lake Forest Park Y 1Meridian Park YParkwood YRidgecrest 2 1 1SyreEinstein 1 2 2 5 2Kellogg 2 2 3 1 3Shorecrest 2 2 2 3Shorewood 2 3 3 5Home Education Exchange 2 2 1Fircrest Residential Habilitation Handicapped Contractual Services Room Nine Community School

*As of initital release of AYP results, August 17, 2010

Counts of "No" Cells

Page 13: MSP data

2010 AYP Results* - “No” Cells Detail

*As of initial release of AYP results, August 17, 2010

Page 14: MSP data

Distribution of AYP “No” Cells

“No” CellsSubgroup Math Reading TotalAll 3 3Hispanic 1 1Low Income 5 1 6SPED 7 9 16All 11.5% 11.5%Hispanic 3.8% 3.8%Low Income 19.2% 3.8% 23.1%SPED 26.9% 34.6% 61.5%Total 15 11 26

57.7% 42.3% 100.0%

Over half of the AYP cells were in math proficiency

23% of the AYP cells were in the low income subgroup


Recommended