Date post: | 14-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | fauzanirfandy |
View: | 221 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 33
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
1/33
Chapter 16
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
2/33
Capacity and economy of
multiple-effect evaporators
The increase in economy through the use of
multiple-effect evaporation is obtained at thecost of reduced capacity.
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
3/33
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
4/33
The total capacity of a multiple-effectevaporator is usually not greater than that
of a single-effect evaporator having a
heating surface equal to one of the effectsand operating under the same terminal
condition.
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
5/33
If the heating load and the heat of dilution are
neglected, the capacity of an evaporator is directly
proportional to the rate of heat transfer.
(16-13)1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3A t q U A t q U A t
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
6/33
The total capacity is proportional to the total
rate of heart transfer qT
(16-14)1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3Tq U A t U A t U A t
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
7/33
Assume that the surface area is A in eacheffect and that the overall coefficient Uis
also the same in each effect.
Then
(16-15)1 2 3( )Tq UA t t t UA t
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
8/33
tis the total temperature drop between the
steam in the first effect and the vapor in thelast effect.
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
9/33
Suppose now that a single-effect evaporatorwith a surface area A is operating with thesame total temperature drop.
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
10/33
If the overall coefficient is the same as in each
effect of the triple-effect evaporator.
For the single effect
Tq UA t
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
11/33
This is exactly the same equation as that for
the multiple-effect evaporator
The boiling-point elevation tends to make the
capacity of the multiple-effect evaporator
less than that of the corresponding singleeffect.
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
12/33
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
13/33
The average coefficient for the multiple-effectevaporator would be greater than that for thesingle-effect.
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
14/33
Effect of l iquid head and
boil ing-point elevation
The liquid head and the boiling-point elevation
influence the capacity of a multiple-effect
evaporator even more than they do that of asingle effect
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
15/33
The reduction in capacity caused by the liquid
head, as before, cannot be estimated
quantitatively.
The liquid head reduces the temperature drop
available in each effect of a multiple-effect of
a multiple-effect evaporator.
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
16/33
The temperature drop in any effect is calculated
from the temperature of saturated steam at
the pressure of the steam chest, and not from
the temperature of the boiling liquid in theprevious effect.
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
17/33
This means that the boiling-point elevation in
any effect is lost from the total available
temperature drop.
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
18/33
This loss occurs in every effect of a
multiple-effect evaporator, and the
resulting loss of capacity.
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
19/33
Consider the single-effect evaporator.
Of the total temperature drop of 181,the shaded part represents the loss in
temperature drop 105
The actual driving force for heat transfer
is represented by the unshaded part.
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
20/33
105
temperature
100
176
281
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
21/33
The diagram for the double-effect evaporatorshows two shaded portions because there is
a boiling-point elevation in the two effect.
The residual unshaded part, 85, is smaller
than in the diagram for the single effect.
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
22/33
50
100
281
176
35
226
246
105
temperature
100
176
281
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
23/33
In the triple-effect evaporator there areshaded portions since there is a loss
temperature drop in each of three effects,
and the total net available temperaturedrop ,79
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
24/33
105
temperature
100
176
281
50
100
281
176
35
226
246
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
25/33
Substitution from Eq. (16-2)into Eq. (16-8)gives
(16-16)( )f pf f
v v
m c t t WD
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
26/33
The economy of a multiple-effect evaporator is
not influenced by boiling-point elevations if
minor factors, such as the temperature of the
feed and changes in heats of evaporization,
are neglected. Then by Eqs. (16-16)
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
27/33
A kilogram of steam condensing in the first
effect generates about a kilogram of vapor,
which condenses in the second effect,generating another kilogram there, and so
on.
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
28/33
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
29/33
Optimum number of effects
The cost of each effect of an evaporator per
square meter of surface is a function of its
total area.
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
30/33
The investment required for an N-effect
evaporator is about Ntimes that for a
single-effect evaporator of the same capacity.
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
31/33
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
32/33
7/27/2019 Multi Effect
33/33