+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Multi Effect

Multi Effect

Date post: 14-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: fauzanirfandy
View: 221 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 33

Transcript
  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    1/33

    Chapter 16

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    2/33

    Capacity and economy of

    multiple-effect evaporators

    The increase in economy through the use of

    multiple-effect evaporation is obtained at thecost of reduced capacity.

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    3/33

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    4/33

    The total capacity of a multiple-effectevaporator is usually not greater than that

    of a single-effect evaporator having a

    heating surface equal to one of the effectsand operating under the same terminal

    condition.

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    5/33

    If the heating load and the heat of dilution are

    neglected, the capacity of an evaporator is directly

    proportional to the rate of heat transfer.

    (16-13)1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3A t q U A t q U A t

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    6/33

    The total capacity is proportional to the total

    rate of heart transfer qT

    (16-14)1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3Tq U A t U A t U A t

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    7/33

    Assume that the surface area is A in eacheffect and that the overall coefficient Uis

    also the same in each effect.

    Then

    (16-15)1 2 3( )Tq UA t t t UA t

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    8/33

    tis the total temperature drop between the

    steam in the first effect and the vapor in thelast effect.

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    9/33

    Suppose now that a single-effect evaporatorwith a surface area A is operating with thesame total temperature drop.

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    10/33

    If the overall coefficient is the same as in each

    effect of the triple-effect evaporator.

    For the single effect

    Tq UA t

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    11/33

    This is exactly the same equation as that for

    the multiple-effect evaporator

    The boiling-point elevation tends to make the

    capacity of the multiple-effect evaporator

    less than that of the corresponding singleeffect.

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    12/33

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    13/33

    The average coefficient for the multiple-effectevaporator would be greater than that for thesingle-effect.

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    14/33

    Effect of l iquid head and

    boil ing-point elevation

    The liquid head and the boiling-point elevation

    influence the capacity of a multiple-effect

    evaporator even more than they do that of asingle effect

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    15/33

    The reduction in capacity caused by the liquid

    head, as before, cannot be estimated

    quantitatively.

    The liquid head reduces the temperature drop

    available in each effect of a multiple-effect of

    a multiple-effect evaporator.

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    16/33

    The temperature drop in any effect is calculated

    from the temperature of saturated steam at

    the pressure of the steam chest, and not from

    the temperature of the boiling liquid in theprevious effect.

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    17/33

    This means that the boiling-point elevation in

    any effect is lost from the total available

    temperature drop.

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    18/33

    This loss occurs in every effect of a

    multiple-effect evaporator, and the

    resulting loss of capacity.

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    19/33

    Consider the single-effect evaporator.

    Of the total temperature drop of 181,the shaded part represents the loss in

    temperature drop 105

    The actual driving force for heat transfer

    is represented by the unshaded part.

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    20/33

    105

    temperature

    100

    176

    281

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    21/33

    The diagram for the double-effect evaporatorshows two shaded portions because there is

    a boiling-point elevation in the two effect.

    The residual unshaded part, 85, is smaller

    than in the diagram for the single effect.

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    22/33

    50

    100

    281

    176

    35

    226

    246

    105

    temperature

    100

    176

    281

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    23/33

    In the triple-effect evaporator there areshaded portions since there is a loss

    temperature drop in each of three effects,

    and the total net available temperaturedrop ,79

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    24/33

    105

    temperature

    100

    176

    281

    50

    100

    281

    176

    35

    226

    246

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    25/33

    Substitution from Eq. (16-2)into Eq. (16-8)gives

    (16-16)( )f pf f

    v v

    m c t t WD

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    26/33

    The economy of a multiple-effect evaporator is

    not influenced by boiling-point elevations if

    minor factors, such as the temperature of the

    feed and changes in heats of evaporization,

    are neglected. Then by Eqs. (16-16)

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    27/33

    A kilogram of steam condensing in the first

    effect generates about a kilogram of vapor,

    which condenses in the second effect,generating another kilogram there, and so

    on.

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    28/33

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    29/33

    Optimum number of effects

    The cost of each effect of an evaporator per

    square meter of surface is a function of its

    total area.

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    30/33

    The investment required for an N-effect

    evaporator is about Ntimes that for a

    single-effect evaporator of the same capacity.

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    31/33

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    32/33

  • 7/27/2019 Multi Effect

    33/33


Recommended