+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been overseen by an elite...

Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been overseen by an elite...

Date post: 19-Dec-2015
Category:
View: 218 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
32
Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit. characterized by government subsidization of research and development and targeting of tax breaks for specific industrial sectors key in facilitating the economy’s ability to move through the product cycle, advancing from textiles, to automobiles, to semi-conductors. characterized by an “iron triangle” of bureaucrats, politicians, and businessmen, contributing to major corruption scandals. b, c, and d only. all of the above.
Transcript
Page 1: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

Multiple Choice Practice Question

Administrative guidance in Japan has been overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit. characterized by government subsidization of research and

development and targeting of tax breaks for specific industrial sectors

key in facilitating the economy’s ability to move through the product cycle, advancing from textiles, to automobiles, to semi-conductors.

characterized by an “iron triangle” of bureaucrats, politicians, and businessmen, contributing to major corruption scandals.

b, c, and d only. all of the above.

Page 2: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

Multiple Choice

Answer: all of the above

Page 3: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

Question for today

When did Japan become a democracy?

Page 4: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

4

Definition of democracy

Political RightsOpportunity to participate in choice of political

leadersVoting rightsRight to run for office

Civil LibertiesFreedom of speech, press, assembly, religionTrial by juryProtection against cruel government action

Page 5: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

Question for today

When did Japan become a democracy? Note the policy relevance of this question.

Page 6: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

6

Political Development in Japan, pre-WW II

Recall “Meiji Restoration,” 1868 Group of reformers

overthrew Tokugawa regime

Acted in name of emperor Hence “restoration”

Page 7: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

Political Development in Japan, pre-WW II Japan emulated advanced institutions in

the West Established new ministries

Army and Navy 1873 universal male military conscription

Education Ministry Achieved universal primary education by 1907

Page 8: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

Political Development in Japan, pre-WW II Japanese studied other

systems, ideas 1880s translation,

publishing John Stuart Mill’s On

Liberty Rousseau’s Social

Contract

http://www.pacificcentury.org/meiji5.html

Page 9: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

Political Development in Japan, pre-WW II Japan establishes democratic institutions

Initial goals Strengthen legitimacy of government Mobilize people in support of national goals

Constitution 1889 Established Parliament (Diet)

House of Representatives House of Peers

Males paying 15 yen in taxes can vote Tax qualifications gradually lowered

Page 10: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

Political Development in Japan, pre-WW II Achieves universal male suffrage 1925

Page 11: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

11

Political development in Japan pre-WWII

Taisho Democracy

(1913-1932) Constitutional monarchy Parliamentary

government with prime minister

Prime minister alternated between two main political parties

Universal male suffrage, 1925

Page 12: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

12

Political development in Japan pre-WWII Constitutional flaws

Prime minister and cabinet NOT formally under parliamentary control Power derived from emperor—not parliament

Military NOT subject to parliamentary (civilian) control

Page 13: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

Political Development in Japan

Militarization and World War II Facilitated by

Constitutional flaws Economic crisis: Depression—break down of trade

Army general prime minister Imperial Rule Assistance Association

Intended to be single, nationwide popular movement like

Nazi Party in Germany Fascist Party in Italy

Page 14: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

Post-WW II Japan

Defeat in WW II US Occupation

Occupation reforms “Article 9” = renounce war Address constitutional flaws

Parliament Civil liberties Emperor—ceremonial role

Japan’s pre-war model--important Polity: democracy, experience

with political party competition

General MacArthur with Emperor

Page 15: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

Japan as an “Uncommon Democracy”

Domination by a single political party in post-war, 20th C, democratic Japan:

LDP Why?

Page 16: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

Sources of LDP DominanceElectoral districts—rural biasStrong record of economic growth under LDP

until 1990sSingle non-transferable vote (SNTV) system

(until 1994)Patronage / machine politics Koenkai (local support groups)

Japan as an “Uncommon Democracy”

Page 17: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

Japan as an “Uncommon Democracy”

Pressure for reform of political institutions Crisis in LDP-dominated system (1993)

Corruption scandalsSlower economic growthForeign pressure to open markets

Page 18: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

Pressure for reform of political institutions

Coalition of small parties in House of Representatives pushed through reforms:Reformed electoral systemOpened rice market to international importsRedistricted to reduce rural bias

Page 19: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

Political Development in Contemporary Japan

What is current design of electoral institutions?

Why?

Page 20: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

Political Development in Contemporary Japan

Electoral system reform (1994)House of Representatives (480 seats)“Mixed” system

300 seats elected through single member districts

by first-past-the-post 180 seats elected through multi-member districts

by proportional representation

gives small parties “voice without power”

Page 21: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

Proportional Representation (D’Hondt) electoral rules: Example

Divisor / Party

LDP

Japan Socialist Party (JSP)

Clean Govern-ment Party (CGP)

Independent

Japan Communist Party (JCP)

1 327,000 122,000 95,000 81,000 17,000 2 163,500 61,000 47,500 40,500 8,500

Divisor / Party

LDP

Japan Socialist Party (JSP)

Clean Govern-ment Party (CGP)

Independent

Japan Communist Party (JCP)

1 1st 3rd 4th 5th 2 2nd

Page 22: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

Reform of political institutions Impact of new electoral system—NOT

revolutionary But by 1998, rise of a new party: Democratic Party of Japan 2003 DPJ “Manifesto”—party platform— tried to move toward more programmatic

politics

Page 23: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

Possible re-alignment in Japanese politics? Old-style political appeals

Local party machines (local support groups called koenkai)

LDP has dominated in this style of politics Possible new-style political appeals???

Ideologically oriented (e.g. left-right, liberal-conservative) party platforms

DPJ is trying to compete on a party platform (as with its 2003 “Manifesto”)

Page 24: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

Rise of DPJ DPJ strong showing

In 2003 elections, DPJ made a strong showing, establishing themselves as a credible opposition to the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), and prompting talk of Japan becoming a two-party political system.

DPJ self presentation DPJ presented itself as the only party that could truly

reform Japan's economy and administration. …the vested interests of the LDP members meant it would never be able to do so.

“Manifesto” vs. “koenkai” 2003 election results

Page 25: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

Results of 2003 Election to Japan’s

House of Representatives

Party Single-member constituencies

Proportional representation

Total

LDP 168 69 237 (-10) DPJ 105 72 177 (+40) Komeito 9 25 34 JCP 0 9 9 SDP 1 5 6 CP 4 0 4 Others 13 0 13 480

LDP: Liberal Democratic Party; DPJ: Democratic Party of Japan Komeito: Clean Government Party; JCP: Japan Communist PartySDP: Social Democratic Party; CP: Conservative Party

Page 26: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

Results of 2005 Election to Japan’s House of Representatives

Party Single-member constituencies

Proportional representation

Total

LDP 219 77 296 (+60) DPJ 52 61 113 (-64) New Komeito

8 23 31

JCP 0 9 9 SDP 1 6 7 Others 20 4 24 480

LDP: Liberal Democratic Party; DPJ: Democratic Party of Japan Komeito: Clean Government Party; JCP: Japan Communist PartySDP: Social Democratic Party;

Page 27: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

LDP Leaders Prime Ministers Junichiro Koizumi

2001-06 Economic reformer Resigned according to LDP

rules on term limits

Shinzo Abe 2006- 07

Yasuo Fukuda 2007- 08

Taro Aso September 2008 -

Page 28: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

Aso's woesJan 16th 2009

Realignment on the cards???

“…if the opposition DPJ were to win the largest share of the vote in the general election …this could produce a two-party political system in which each of the major contenders would be relatively unified ideologically--and hence would offer voters a real choice of policies.”

Page 29: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

Results of 2009 Election to Japan’s House of Representatives

LDP: Liberal Democratic Party; DPJ: Democratic Party of Japan Komeito: Clean Government Party; JCP: Japan Communist PartySDP: Social Democratic Party; CP: Conservative Party

LDP 64 55 119 (-177)DPJ 221 87 308 (+195)New Komeito 0 21 21 (-10)JCP 0 9 9SDP 3 4 7Others 12 4 16

Total ChangePartySingle-member constituencies

Proportional Representation

Page 30: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

Prime Minister Naoto Kan at the House of

Representatives, February 2011

Page 31: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

Comparative theories relevant to Tunisia, Egypt, & beyond

EgyptJan. 25

TunisiaJan. 12

Page 32: Multiple Choice Practice Question Administrative guidance in Japan has been  overseen by an elite bureaucracy recruited on the basis of merit.  characterized.

Comparative theories relevant to Egypt, & beyond


Recommended