ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Multiple shoot proliferation, bulblet induction and evaluationof genetic stability in Asiatic hybrid lily (Lilium sp.)
Rakesh Yadav • Neha Yadav • Minakshi Pal •
Umesh Goutam
Received: 15 June 2013 / Accepted: 14 December 2013 / Published online: 29 January 2014
� Indian Society for Plant Physiology 2014
Abstract An efficient multiple shoot cluster regeneration
and micro-bulb induction protocol was developed for
Asiatic hybrid lily (Lilium sp.). Highest multiple shoot
cluster formation of 78.4 % was observed on MS medium
supplemented with 0.25 mg l-1 BAP and 1.0 mg l-1 GA3.
The growth regulators, i.e., abscisic acid, daminozide
and chlorocholine chloride, significantly affected bulblet
quality parameters such as average size, number, fresh
mass, and scale count. A dose of 0.1 mg l-1 abscisic acid,
50 mg l-1 daminozide, and 10 mg l-1 chlorocholine chloride
exhibited highest micro-bulb regeneration rate per explant of
6.0 ± 0.28, 5.6 ± 0.17, and 6.0 ± 0.34, respectively. A high
sucrose concentration of 40 g l-1 also produced highest
number of bulblet per explant (6.1 ± 0.05). Amongst the 10
arbitrary decamer primers used to analyze the samples,
only 6 primers amplified clear reproducible bands. The 6
primers produced a total of 36 (an average of 6 bands per
primer) scorable bands. Phenotypic observations and ran-
domly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis
established that the regenerated micro-bulbs did not
develop any detectable genetic aberration. Thus, the results
indicate that in vitro produced bulblets of Lilium spp.
(Asiatic hybrid) were clonally identical to their donor plant
and were genetically stable.
Keywords Bulblet � Lilium � Genetic stability � RAPD
Introduction
Lilies are well known perennial bulbous plants belonging
to the monocotyledonous family Liliaceae. Worldwide,
over 100 species reside in Northern Hemisphere and
thousands of genotypes are cultivated at commercial scale
as floricultural crops, mainly because of their large,
attractive flowers (Wang et al. 2009). Bulbs are cultivated
commercially for use in the cut flower and potted-plant
industries. Additionally, Lilies have also been described for
their medicinal values as a stomachic, stimulant and aro-
matic drug (Malla 1994). The premier commercial lilies
principally belong to three hybrid groups: the Asiatic
hybrids (A), the Oriental hybrids (O), and the Longiflorum
group (L). The establishment of a reproducible plant
regeneration system is necessary to supply true-to-type lily
plants for commercial purposes and also for unconven-
tional improvement approaches such as genetic transfor-
mation and the fusion procedures.
Some reports are available for tissue culture for mem-
bers of the genus Lilium for various species and hybrids
such as L. longiflorum (Nhut 1998), L. rubellum (Niimii
et al. 1997), L. lancifolium (Marinengeli and Curvetto
1997), L. auratum (Takayama and Misawa 1979), L. tes-
taceum (Wozniewski et al. 1991), L. formosanum (Nakano
et al. 2000), L. davidii (LingFei et al. 2009), L. oxypetalum
(Joshi and Dhar 2009) L. ledebourii (Bakhshaie et al. 2010)
and Lilium hybrids (Novak and Petru 1981; Marinengeli
and Curvetto 1997). However, there is no reliable
R. Yadav (&) � N. Yadav
Department of Bio and Nano Technology, Guru Jambheshwar
University of Science and Technology, Hisar 125001, Haryana,
India
e-mail: [email protected]
M. Pal
Centre for Plant Biotechnology, Haryana State Council for
Science and Technology, CCSHAU New Campus,
Hisar 125001, Haryana, India
U. Goutam
Department of Biotechnology, Lovely Professional University,
Phagwara 144402, Punjab, India
123
Ind J Plant Physiol. (October–December 2013) 18(4):354–359
DOI 10.1007/s40502-014-0060-4
regeneration protocol that can be applied to all major lily
cultivars.
Since, variations appear in tissue culture-raised plants
because of occurrence of mutational events in the somatic
cells; production of true-to-type plants through micro-
propagation techniques is important in order to retain
genotypic and phenotypic similarities of donor plant. The
incongruities are usually inherited and are therefore,
redundant in clonal propagation. Therefore, a molecular
marker based system for determination of genetic fidelity is
rapid and reliable method. Keeping in view, a protocol for
rapid clonal multiplication of Lilium spp. (Asiatic hybrid
cultivar) along with establishment of genetic stability
through RAPD has been described herein.
Materials and methods
Explant preparation and surface sterilization
Fresh field-grown bulbs (circumference 18–20 cm) of Li-
lium spp. (Asiatic hybrids) were collected and stored at
4 �C in refrigerator until use. The roots and brown scales
were excised from the bulbs and these were washed thor-
oughly under running tap water for 10 min. A hot water
treatment was given in water bath for 40 min followed by
overnight air drying. Dried bulbs were incised to obtain
individual scales. Scales were surface sterilized by soaking
in 15 % laboline solution containing two drops of Tween-
20 for 5 min, followed by a treatment with 0.5 % Bavistin
(50 % w/v Cabandazim) solution for 15 min. Explants
were then rinsed 2–3 times with autoclaved distilled water
and transferred to laminar flow cabinet. For further disin-
fection, bulbs were again soaked in 0.1 % HgCl2 solution
for 5 min followed by a quick dip in rectified spirit for
about 30 s. Eventually, the bulbs were rinsed in sterile
distilled water 4–5 times to remove any traces of chemicals
affixed during various surface disinfection treatments as
reported by Yadav et al. (2009). Before inoculation, the
bulbs were dried onto sterile filter paper discs.
Culture medium and conditions
Basal MS medium (Murashige and Skoog 1962) solidified
with 0.8 % (w/v) agar, containing sucrose at a concentra-
tion of 30 mg l-1 was used for initial in vitro regeneration
of bulb-scales. Effect of six BAP concentrations viz. 0.1,
0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 2.0 mg l-1 was studied at a constant
concentration of 0.5 or 1.0 or 2.0 mg l-1 GA3 on the initial
multiple shoot induction response of in vitro raised
adventitious buds. The pH of all the medium was adjusted
to 5.8 with 1 N NaOH or 1 N HCl before autoclaving at
121 �C and 108 kPa for 15 min. Cultures were maintained
in Jam-bottles in plant tissue culture room at 25 ± 2 �C
under a 16 h photoperiod. White light was provided by
fluorescent tubes at a photon flux density of 45 lmol m-2
s-1. Cultures were transferred to a fresh medium after
every 3–4 weeks to supplement nutrients.
In vitro microbulb regeneration and growth of bulblets
To study the effect of sucrose and growth retardants on
differentiation, microbulb formation and growth of bul-
blets, MS medium was supplemented with various con-
centrations of sucrose (10, 20, 30 and 40 g l-1). In other
experiments, MS media were supplemented with growth
retardants such as chlorocholine chloride (CCC 2-chlor-
oethyltrimethylammonium chloride; 1, 10, and 50 mg l-1),
daminozide (B-NINE 1, 10, and 50 mg l-1) and abscisic
acid (ABA 0.1, 0.5 and 1 mg l-1) to study their effects on
bulblet regeneration.
Random amplification polymorphic DNA (RAPD)
analysis of the regenerated bulblets
After 18–20 weeks of culture, nine microbulbs were ran-
domly selected among various events of in vitro regener-
ated bulblets to carry out RAPD analysis along with the
mother control plant (M). Young scales (*120 mg) were
ground in liquid nitrogen followed by total genomic DNA
extraction by CTAB method with minor modification. The
DNA quality and yield were analyzed by gel electropho-
resis and Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Nanodrop�, ND-
1000, Nanodrop Technologies, Wilmington, Delaware,
USA), respectively, followed by dilution to 20 ng ll-1
with Tris EDTA buffer. RAPD analysis with ten decamer
arbitrary primers (OPT-1, OPT-2, OPT-3, OPT-4, OPT-5,
OPT-6, OPT-7, OPT-8, OPT-9 and OPT-11) was per-
formed according to Punia et al. (2009) with minor mod-
ification. A PCR reaction mixture (15 ll) containing 30 ng
genomic DNA, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.4 mM each of the
deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dATP, dGTP, dCTP,
dTTP), 1.0 U Taq DNA polymerase, and 0.1 lM of primer
was subjected to PCR amplification in a i-cyclerTM ther-
mocycler (BioRad, USA), with the initial denaturation at
94 �C for 3 min, followed by 45 cycles at 94 �C for 60 s, at
37 �C for 90 s and at 70 �C for 2 min and 1 final extension
cycle at 72 �C for 10 min. Two independent amplification
reactions were performed with all RAPD primers.
The PCR amplified products were separated on 1 %
agarose gel augmented with 0.5 mg ml-1 ethidium bro-
mide in 19 TAE buffer (40 mM Tris acetate, 1 mM
EDTA, pH 8.2) using Minipack-250, a submerged hori-
zontal gel electrophoretic system (GeNeiTM) at 70 V for
2 h. A 1 kb DNA ladder was used as molecular weight
standard. Separated DNA fragments were visualized and
Ind J Plant Physiol. (October–December 2013) 18(4):354–359 355
123
photographed with UV light on gel documentation system/
bioimaging system (GeneGenius, Syngene, UK).
Observations, data recording and statistical analysis
The in vitro experiments were carried out in a complete
randomized design with three replications, each containing
eight explants. Data were recorded at 8, 10 and 12 weeks
after culture. Data scored were subjected to one way
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with a 0.05 % significance
level by Duncan’s equal variance. These tests were con-
ducted using the statistical software package SPSS for
windows (v. 13.0 SPSS Inc USA).
Only discernible and reproducible bands obtained on
gels were scored by binary matrix based on presence and
absence. Data were subjected to the NTSys PC version
2.02j (www.exetersoftware.com) statistical analysis pack-
age, and cluster analysis was conducted. Similarity esti-
mates were calculated (Nei and Li 1979), and cluster
analysis was carried out using unweighted pair grouping
method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA).
Results and discussion
The percentage of shoot regenerating explants ranged from
4.3 to 78.4 % as shown in Fig. 1. The data indicates sig-
nificant differences among the culture media. Out of three
concentrations of GA3 tested in combination with various
concentrations of BAP, 1.0 mg l-1 GA3 concentration was
highly responsive with a minimum of 14.2 % shoot
regeneration at 1.0 mg l-1 BAP and maximum of 78.4 %
shoot regeneration at 0.25 mg l-1 BAP. Both lower and
higher doses of GA3 than 1.0 mg l-1 resulted into stumpy
regeneration rates and also affected shoot proliferation
potential. Similar results were reported by Bacchetta et al.
(2003) in Asiatic hybrid cultivars of lily onto BAP and IAA
supplemented MS medium.
Inclusion of GA3 in tissue culture media can suppress
callusing of cultures but favor healthier growth and dif-
ferentiation even at very low concentration of 0.1 mg l-1
(Morel et al. 1968). In combination with BAP, GA3 has
been shown to be essential to raise whole plants from
cultured meristem tips (Kartha et al. 1974).
After 3 weeks of culture, bulblet induction begun and
thickets of bulbs with burgeoning leaves were visible by
5 weeks of culture (Fig. 2c). Increased concentration of
ABA from 0.1 to 1.0 mg l-1 caused an adverse effect on
the microbulb regeneration potential of the culture as
illustrated in the Table 1. However, increase in the con-
centration of B-NINE from 1 to 50 mg l-1 enhanced an
average number of bulblet regeneration per explant from
2.8 ± 0.03 to 5.6 ± 0.17 as well as fresh mass of bulblets.
In case of CCC, highest microbulb regeneration rate of
6.0 ± 0.34 was observed at 10 mg l-1 concentration.
Further increase or decrease in CCC concentration
decreased microbulb regeneration potential of shoot clus-
ters (Table 1).
ABA-mediated signaling mechanisms play an important
part in plants to inhibit the synthesis of kinetin nucleotide
(Miernyk 1979) and also down-regulates enzymes needed
for photosynthesis (Chandler and Robertson 1994). Being
growth retardant, even very low concentration of ABA
(*0.1 mg l-1) has triggered reduction in shoot growth rate
and induced microbulb differentiation in lily as observed in
our results (Table 1). B-NINE is a synthetic plant growth
regulator that was first approved for use in the USA in
1963, primarily, for applying on apples. Low concentra-
tions of B-NINE (1 mg l-1) used in this study was insuf-
ficient to induce significant growth retardation and that too
bulblet regeneration. CCC is another chemical agent that
serves as antigibberellin growth retardant, with its gibber-
ellins biosynthesis restraining-based mechanism in plant
tissues. In present study, 10 mg l-1 dose of CCC was
found potent for highest microbulb regeneration rate
(Table 1).
Amongst various concentrations tested, 40 g l-1 sucrose
(w/v) showed highest microbulb regeneration rate of
6.1 ± 0.05 per explant through axillary shoot bud culture
(Table 1). The medium with inclusion of the same con-
centration of sucrose also regenerated bulblets with highest
fresh weight. Bulblets further grew in size during a
3–4 week subculture phase. Average fresh mass and
diameter of in vitro bulblets increased at higher concen-
tration of sucrose (Yadav and Beniwal 2008). Basically,
high sucrose dose is known to stimulate differentiation and
Fig. 1 Effect of various concentrations of BAP in the presence of 0.5
(filled diamond) or 1.0 (filled square) or 2.0 mg l-1 (filled triangle)
GA3 on percentage plant regeneration of Lilium spp. (Asiatic hybrids)
by adventitious buds; filled diamonds, at constant amount of
0.5 mg l-1 GA3; filled squares, at constant amount of 1.0 mg l-1
GA3; filled triangles, at constant amount of 2.0 mg l-1 GA3
356 Ind J Plant Physiol. (October–December 2013) 18(4):354–359
123
formation of storage structures such as bulbs as revealed in
earlier studies in lilies (Marinengeli and Curvetto 1997;
Kumar et al. 2005), gladiolus (Dantu and Bhojwani 1987)
and potatoes (Garner and Blake 1989). An increase in
bulblet size at higher concentration of sucrose was
achieved because of the increase in starch and total car-
bohydrates content (Langens-Gerrits et al. 1997).
Somaclonal variations are very recurrent in tissue cul-
ture based micropropagation systems. The extent of vari-
ation in tissue culture relies upon the type of explant, its
source and the mode of regeneration (Larkin et al. 1989).
Out of the 10 primers tested, 6 generated clear, scorable
and reproducible amplifications (Table 2). Amongst these
6 amplified primers, three produced monomorphic patterns;
whereas, the others generated polymorphic bands. The
number of bands for each primer varied from 4 (OPT-06)
to 8 (OPT-08) and ranged in size from 150 bp to 2.0 kb.
Figure 3 showed RAPD amplification pattern with primers
OPT-1, OPT-8, and OPT-11 which reveals monomorphism
in gel profiles. All amplified primers produced a total of 36
bands with an average of 6 bands per primer. Out of the 36
scorable bands, 30 were monomorphic (83.4 %); while,
only 6 were polymorphic (16.6 %; Table 2).
Cluster analysis using the UPGMA clustering method
was performed on the basis of similarity matrix calculated
from the RAPD results. UPGMA phenogram generated
through RAPD similarity profile were confined in two
major groups, which were clustered at similarity coeffi-
cients of 0.925–0.948 with a mean value of 0.936. These
analyses indicated that regenerated plants resembled the
donor control genetic profiles, based on RAPD report. As
depicted in Fig. 3, the regenerated progeny shared identical
banding patterns as that of the explant-source mother plant,
signifying their genetically similarity. The present findings
substantiate earlier reports of the genetic stability in lilies
(Varshney et al. 2001).
Fig. 2 Mass proliferation and bulblet induction in Lilium spp. a In
vitro regeneration of Lilium bulb-scale on MS basal media; b Multiple
shoot cluster developing from one adventitious bud of Lilium on MS
medium supplemented with 0.25 mg l-1 BAP and 1.0 mg l-1 GA3;
arrows indicate multi-shoots with axillary buds; c Adventitious
bulblet induction in Lilium cultures on MS medium supplemented
with 0.1 mg l-1 ABA after 3 weeks of culture; arrows indicate
bulblet formation
Table 1 Effect of three growth retardants and sucrose on bulblet
regeneration of in vitro cultures of Asiatic hybrid of lily after
10 weeks of incubation period
Treatments
(mg l-1)
Number of
bulblet per
explant
Fresh
weight
(mg)
Diameter
(mm)
Number of
scales
ABA
0.1 6.0 ± 0.28 182 ± 1.15 5.2 ± 0.17 11.2 ± 0.11
0.5 4.3 ± 0.23 165 ± 1.73 5.0 ± 0.28 10.4 ± 0.05
1.0 3.7 ± 0.28 138 ± 2.30 4.4 ± 0.11 9.2 ± 0.11
B-NINE
1 2.8 ± 0.03 126 ± 0.57 3.8 ± 0.11 7.8 ± 0.17
10 4.6 ± 0.11 173 ± 1.73 4.2 ± 0.05 9.4 ± 0.05
50 5.6 ± 0.17 191 ± 1.15 5.0 ± 0.34 10.8 ± 0.11
CCC
1 3.8 ± 0.23 136 ± 1.15 4.7 ± 0.11 8.6 ± 0.17
10 6.0 ± 0.34 187 ± 0.57 5.4 ± 0.11 11.9 ± 0.05
50 4.2 ± 0.17 168 ± 2.30 4.0 ± 0.05 9.1 ± 0.17
Sucrose
10,000 2.7 ± 0.11 140 ± 4.61 3.9 ± 0.11 8.7 ± 0.11
20,000 4.1 ± 0.49 156 ± 1.73 4.8 ± 0.12 10.2 ± 0.11
30,000 4.9 ± 0.17 191 ± 1.73 5.6 ± 0.17 11.8 ± 0.17
40,000 6.1 ± 0.05 198 ± 1.15 5.3 ± 0.11 11.7 ± 0.17
Data represent means ± standard errors for three replicates
Ind J Plant Physiol. (October–December 2013) 18(4):354–359 357
123
It is established that a combination of 0.25 mg l-1 BAP
and 1.0 mg l-1 GA3 is highly efficient for multiple shoot
formation. The bulblets developed from microshoots serve
as candidate-propagules for both successful ex vitro accli-
matization, as well as, prolonged storage adaptation. The
results also underline efficient doses of growth retardants,
ABA, B-NINE, and CCC, which are stimulatory for larger
number of microbulb regeneration per explant.
Acknowledgments Authors thank Dr. Ashok Dhawan for critical
reading, valuable comments and suggestions on an earlier version of
this manuscript. We are grateful to the Department of Biotechnology,
New Delhi and the Department of Science and Technology, New
Delhi, Govt. of India for the financial assistance.
References
Bacchetta, L., Remotti, P. C., Bernardini, C., & Saccardo, F. (2003).
Adventitious shoot regeneration from leaf explants and stem nodes
of Lilium. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 74, 37–44.
Bakhshaie, M., Babalar, M., Masoud, M., & Khalighi, A. (2010).
Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration of Lilium ledeb-
ourii (Baker) Boiss., an endangered species. Plant Cell, Tissue
and Organ Culture, 102, 229–235.
Chandler, P. M., & Robertson, M. (1994). Gene expression regulated by
abscisic acid and its relation to stress tolerance. Annual Review of
Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 45, 113–141.
Dantu, P. K., & Bhojwani, S. S. (1987). In vitro propagation of
gladiolus. Gartenbauwissenschaft, 52, 90–93.
Garner, N., & Blake, J. (1989). The induction of potato microtubers
in vitro on media free growth regulatory substances. Annals of
Botany, 63, 663–674.
Joshi, S. K., & Dhar, U. (2009). In vitro propagation from axenic
explants of Lilium oxypetalum (D. Don) Baker, an endemic
bulbous plant of high altitude Himalaya. Acta Physiologiae
Plantarum, 31, 833–838.
Kartha, K. K., Gamborg, O. L., Constabel, F., & Shyluk, J. P. (1974).
Regeneration of cassava plants from apical meristems. Plant
Science Letters, 2, 107–113.
Kumar, S., Kashyap, M., & Sharma, D. R. (2005). In vitro regen-
eration and bulblet growth from lily bulbscale explants as
affected by retardants, sucrose and irradiance. Biologia Planta-
rum, 49, 629–632.
Table 2 RAPD primers employed for verifying genetic fidelity in Lilium spp.
Primers Primer sequences (50–30) Melting temperatures
Tm (�C)
No. of bands
scored
No. of polymorphic
bands
% Age
Polymorphism
OPT-01 GGTCCTCTCA 41.0 5 0 0
OPT-02 GGAGCGACTC 42.9 – – –
OPT-03 TCCACTACTA 42.2 7 2 28.5
OPT-04 CACATAGGGT 42.8 6 0 0
OPT-05 CGGTTTAGCA 45.8 – – –
OPT-06 CTAGGGCAGA 44.1 4 0 0
OPT-07 GGAAGGCTGT 40.3 – – –
OPT-08 AACGGCGATA 43.0 8 3 37.5
OPT-09 CACCAATGAG 45.1 – – –
OPT-11 TTCGACGCGA 42.6 6 1 16.6
Total 36 6 16.6
Fig. 3 Monomorphic gel profiles of RAPD amplifications with primers OPT-1, OPT-8, and OPT-11; L, molecular size marker (100 bp DNA
ladder); M, mother plant; 1–9, nine randomly selected tissue culture raised bulblets
358 Ind J Plant Physiol. (October–December 2013) 18(4):354–359
123
Langens-Gerrits, M., Lilien-Kipnis, H., Croes, T., Miller, W.,
Kolloffel, C., & De Klerk, G. J. (1997). Bulb growth in lily
regenerated in vitro. Acta Horticulturae, 430, 267–273.
Larkin, P. J., Banks, P. M., Bhati, R., Bretell, R. I. S., Davis, P. A.,
Ryan, S. A., et al. (1989). From somatic variation to variant
plants: Mechanism and applications. Genome, 31, 705–711.
LingFei, X., FengWang, M., & Dong, L. (2009). Plant regeneration
from in vitro cultured leaves of Lanzhou lily (Lilium davidii var.
unicolor). Scientia Horticulturae, 119, 46–458.
Malla, SB. (1994). Medicinal herbs in the Bagamati zone. ADPI Ser
No. 8 (pp. 8–28). Kathmandu: ICIMOD.
Marinengeli, P., & Curvetto, N. (1997). Increased sucrose and salt
concentration in culture medium improved growth of micro-
propagated Lilium bulblets. Biocell, 21, 161–164.
Miernyk, J. A. (1979). Abscisic acid inhibition of kinetin nucleotide
formation in germinating lettuce seeds. Physiologia Plantarum,
45, 63–66.
Morel, G., Martin, C., & Muller, J. F. (1968). La guerison des pomme
de terre atteintes maladies a virus. Annales de Physiologie
Vegetale, 10, 113–139.
Murashige, T., & Skoog, F. (1962). A revised medium for rapid
growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia
Plantarum, 15, 473–497.
Nakano, M., Sakakibara, T., Suzuki, S., & Saito, H. (2000). Decrease
in the regeneration potential of long-term cell suspension
cultures of Lilium formosanum Wallace and its restoration by
the auxin transport inhibitor, 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid. Plant
Science, 158, 129–137.
Nei, M., & Li, W. H. (1979). Mathematical model for studying
genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proceed-
ings of National Academy of Sciences, 76, 5269–5273.
Nhut, D. T. (1998). Micropropagation of lily (Lilium longiflorum).
Plant Cell Reports, 17, 913–916.
Niimii, Y., Nakano, M., & Saito, S. (1997). Production of commercial
Lilium rubellum Baker bulbs: effects of volume and renewal of
liquid medium on in vitro growth, bulb rot infection during cold
treatment, and post-in vitro growth of bulblets. Journal of the
Japanese Society for Horticultural Science, 66, 113–119.
Novak, F. J., & Petru, E. A. (1981). Tissue culture propagation of
Lilium hybrids. Scientia Horticulturae, 14, 191–199.
Punia, A., Yadav, R., Arora, P., & Chaudhury, A. (2009). Molecular
and morphophysiological characterization of superior cluster
bean (Cymopsis tetragonoloba) varieties. Journal of Crop
Science and Biotechnology, 12, 143–148.
Takayama, S., & Misawa, M. (1979). Differentiation in Lilium bulb
scales grown in vitro. Effects of various cultural conditions.
Physiologia Plantarum, 46, 184–190.
Varshney, A., Lakshmikumaran, M., Srivastava, P. S., & Dhawan, V.
(2001). Establishment of genetic fidelity of in vitro-raised lilium
bulblets through RAPD markers. In Vitro Cellular & Develop-
mental Biology: Plant, 37, 227–231.
Wang, J., Huang, L., Bao, M., & Liu, G. (2009). Production of
interspecific hybrids between Lilium longiflorum and L. lopho-
phorum var. linearifolium via ovule culture at early stage.
Euphytica, 167, 45–55.
Wozniewski, T., Blaschek, W., & Franz, G. (1991). In vitro
propagation of Lilium testaceum and structural investigation of
the storage b-1,4-glucomannan. Plant Cell Reports, 10, 457–460.
Yadav, R., Arora, P., Kumar, D., Katyal, D., Dilbaghi, N., &
Chaudhury, A. (2009). High frequency direct plant regeneration
from leaf, internode, and root segments of Eastern Cottonwood
(Populus deltoides). Plant Biotechnology Reports, 3, 175–182.
Yadav, R. & Beniwal, V. (2008). In vitro clonal propagation and
influence of sucrose concentration on bulblet formation in Lily
(p. 18). In: 1st International Society BioTechnology Conference,
Majitar, Sikkim.
Ind J Plant Physiol. (October–December 2013) 18(4):354–359 359
123