Date post: | 31-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | matthew-terry |
View: | 39 times |
Download: | 2 times |
By Munir Mandviwalla, Abhijit Jain, Julie Fesenmaier,Jeff Smith, Paul Weinberg, and Greg Meyers
Presented by Andrew Collins
OverviewRecommendations from a set of participants
who were involved in an expert group set up by the Philadelphia (USA) Mayor’s office.
The recommendations are provided as stages which should be used as a framework for other municipalities who want to create an MWN.
Why MWN?The technology is hereIt’s cheap! $40,000-74,000 sq/mile
A single Zebra Crossing costs £114,000 (Telegraph)
Private corporations only want profitCertain populations will never get Internet
Municipalities have the assets (street/traffic lights)
Cuts cost as entertainment and telephone could merge
GoalsReduce/Remove the “Digital Divide”Cut costs by providing municipal services
electronicallyOn-demand information for tourists
Maps, Tourist Information, etc.Boost participation in political processes
Debates, e-Voting, informationPre-built network infrastructure for
businessesHotels, Cafes, Pubs, etc.
StakeholdersState or City GovernmentMunicipal ServicesUnderserved/
Disadvantaged IndividualsCommunity ResidentsLocal Tourist IndustrySmall and start-up
businessesLarge and mid-sized
corporationsTelecoms and ISPsNon-profit and community
groups
Utility / Transportation / Health care
Higher EducationPublic SchoolsOutside the municipality
PolicyWhy should government get involved in
“luxury” services? Internet is necessity!
Current ISP’s are not happy!Unfair competitionDisruptive technology
ISP’s are not aloneMobile Phone networksEntertainment networks
ApplicationsFree/Cheap Internet AccessBackup communication network
Emergency ServicesCheap telephone (VOIP)
What can’t you do with ubiquitous Internet access?
Wireless TechnologyWi-Fi (IEEE 802.11b, g, n)Wireless Mesh Network (IEEE 802.11s)WiMax (IEEE 802.16)
Upgrade as technology improves
Management and Funding IIPrivate MunicipalitySocial aspects not
importantMay cancel the projectMay be more expensive
No risk to municipalityExperienced
Bad reputation for project management and technology failure
Victim of politics
Social aspects are important
Easier to manage
Implementing the MWNIt could fail!
Users are simply not interestedUsers lack the resources to take advantage
Marketing and Education campaign requiredBoost trust in an MWNResolve computer literacy issues
ConclusionSocial advocates see a cheap project that could
have a huge impact
Technologists see the amazing potential of ubiquitous Internet Access
Civic leaders see opportunity to boost image of municipality
Entrepreneurs see profitable opportunity in a new industry