Murray A. Straus and Yahayra Michel-Smith Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire Durham, NH 03824 603-862-2594 [email protected]Website: http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2 The results in these slides were obtained by creating an SPSS data file in which each case is a distribution of Dyadic Concordance Types (DCTs). In addition to the percent in each DCT, the file includes characteristics of the study which reported the DCT, such as the type of sample. The SPSS file can be downloaded from this website by clicking on this link, You are welcome to use it and add studies, including your own. If you change the file to add DCTs or correct problems, please send it to us. We will then replace the file on the website with the updated version. Results From A Tabulation Of Dyadic Concordance Types
Transcript
Murray A. Straus and Yahayra Michel-SmithFamily Research Laboratory, University of New HampshireDurham, NH 03824 603-862-2594 [email protected]
Website: http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2 The results in these slides were obtained by creating an SPSS data
file in which each case is a distribution of Dyadic Concordance Types (DCTs). In addition to the percent in each DCT, the file includes characteristics of the study which reported the DCT, such as the type of sample.
The SPSS file can be downloaded from this website by clicking on this link, You are welcome to use it and add studies, including your own. If you change the file to add DCTs or correct problems, please send it to us. We will then replace the file on the website with the updated version.
Results From A Tabulation Of Dyadic Concordance Types
Objectives of Slides In This File
Summarize results of a systematic review of studies that have provided the percentage of couples in each DCT. The tabulations summarized in the slides show that, across many studies:
DCTs apply to a wide variety of behaviors DCT patterns tend to be consistent across:• Different types of behavior• Data provided by men and women• Couples with widely varying characteristics such as
– race/ethnic– national context– clinical and general population
(3%) Supplemented by unpublished statistics in order to incorporate a
variety of behaviorsParent-Child Relationship (i.e. CP & CPA)??
Coding 6 Coders Each entry reviewed by a minimum of 2 individuals and at least
one of the authors Coding issues were resolved in consultation with one of the authors
Data Collected
Over 1300 distributions of the percent in each DCTReported in 86 Studies61 authorsConducted or published between 1961 and 2014Male and female respondents of all ages Residing
in 40 countries covering all regions of the worldBehaviors measured by variety of instruments
ycq4
I'm not sure "analyses" is the best word here. This goes back to our conversation this morning. I mean each reported dyadic type distribution (each row in SPSS)
Types Of Behavior For Which DCTs Have Been Reported
27% Psychological Aggression 17% Sexual Coercion 9% Intransigence
Excluding Supplemental Data ??
Physical Aggression (82%) 77% Assault 9% Injury
5% Psychological Aggression
4% Sexual Coercion
Behaviors Studied In Research On Parent-Child And Married & Dating Relationships
Parent-Child– Corporal Punishment– Physical Abuse Of Child
• Married and Dating- Assault
– Intransigence – Psychological Aggression– Injury– Sexual Coercion
Participant Characteristics
Married and Dating Couples 91%Parent-Child Relationship 9% ??One Respondent providing data on both partnersStudents 89%Married and Dating Relationships (99%) not a participant characteristic??Child (18%)
Source Of Data Parent-Child Relationship (9%)
– One Respondent (??)– Married and Dating Relationships (??)– Students (??)
Married & Dating (??%)– One Respondent (91%)– Married and Dating Relationships (??)– Sudents (??)
Characteristics of Studies
Based on Type of Data Analyzed Merge with next slide??
• 68% full form• 10% short form• 10% modified version
• Number of DCTs in Each Study• Mean: 7• Median: 2
• Cross-Sectional (95%)
Married and Dating Couples
Self administered questionnaires (93%)
Past-Year (95%) CTS (95%)
74% full form 17% short form 4% modified version
Parent-Child Relationships
Self administered questionnaires (97%)
Past-Year (98) CTS (50%)
2% full form 47% short form 1% modified version
Characteristics Of StudiesBased on Type of Relationship Evaluated
Slides Showing Mean percent in each DCT
The units for which the means were computed were DCTs, not studies
•Some studies report only one DCT, and others report many The prevalence rate is the men of the DCTs tabulatedThe Ns are the number of DCTs in the data base of the type indicated by the chart
Physical Aggression Percent in Each DCT by Type of Relationship
Parent-Child Relationships Married & Dating Relationships
Prev: 45%N=98
Male-Only Female-Only Both-Assault0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
15
26
58
Prev: 23%N=394
Male-Only Female-Only Both-Assault0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
20
27
53
Parent-Child RelationshipsPercent in Each DCT, by Type of Behavior
WHICHSTUDIES??
Corporal Punishment Child Physical Abuse
Prev: 65%N=48
Prev: 23%N=48
Male-Only Female-Only Both-Assault0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
13
22
65
Male-Only Female-Only Both-Assault0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
26
30
42
Child-Parent RelationshipPercent in Each DCT, by Type of Behavior and Gender of Respondent
Corporal Punishment Child Physical Abuse
Prev: 65%N=48
Prev: 23%N= 48
Male Female Male Female Male FemaleMale-Only Female-Only Both-Assault
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
28
23
43
24
36
41
Male Female Male Female Male FemaleMale-Only Female-Only Both-Assault
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
13 14
73
12
27
61
Married and Dating RelationshipPercent in Each DCT by Type of Behavior
Assault Injury
Prev: 23%N=361
Prev: 9%N=89
Male-Only Female-Only Both-Assault0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
15
27
58
Male-Only Female-Only Both-Assault0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
28
22
47
Married and Dating RelationshipPercent in Each DCT by Type of Behavior
Intransigence Psychological Aggression
Prev: 27% N=102
Prev: 34%N=319
Male-Only Female-Only Both-Assault0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
11 11
78
Male-Only Female-Only Both-Assault0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
16
20
63
Intransigence couples??Percent in Each DCT by Type of Gender of Respondent
Male Female
Prev: 27%N=33
Prev: 25%N= 33
Male-Only Female-Only Both-Assault0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
8
13
79
Male-Only Female-Only Both-Assault0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
8
13
79
IntransigencePercent in Each DCT by Number of Respondents
One Respondent Two Respondents
Prev: 26%N=101
Prev: 70%N=1
Male-Only Female-Only Both-Assault0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
11 11
78
Male-Only Female-Only Both-Assault0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
31 31
37
Eron, L., Banta, T. J., Walder, L. O., & Laulicht, J. H. (1961). Comparison of data obtained from mothers and fathers on childrearing practices and their relation to child aggression. Child Development, 32, 457-472.
Psychological AggressionPercent in Each DCT by Gender of Respondent
Male Female
Prev: 31%N=105
Prev: 37%N= 107
Male-Only Female-Only Both-Assault0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
17 18
64
Male-Only Female-Only Both-Assault0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
16
22
62
Psychological AggressionPercent in Each DCT by Gender of Respondent and Source of Data
