+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Muscle Forces

Muscle Forces

Date post: 24-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: mieko
View: 53 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Involved in bench press and squats. Muscle Forces. Muscle Forces. The force generated by a muscle action Depends on: number and type of motor units activated the size of the muscle the initial length of the muscle when activated the angle of the joint - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
15
MUSCLE FORCES Involved in bench press and squats
Transcript
Page 1: Muscle Forces

MUSCLE FORCESInvolved in bench press and squats

Page 2: Muscle Forces

Muscle Forces The force generated by a muscle action Depends on:

number and type of motor units activated the size of the muscle the initial length of the muscle when

activated the angle of the joint and the muscle's speed of action

Page 3: Muscle Forces

Muscle Activity differences Bench Press

Free weight vs. Machine Press

SquatsNormal squat vs. Unbalanced squat

Page 4: Muscle Forces

Bench Press Most commonly performed exercise,

however commonly performed incorrectly. Major Muscles Used-

Pectoralis Major, Anterior Deltoid, Medial Deltoid, Triceps, Biceps (somewhat).

VariationsClose gripWide GripMachine Press

Page 5: Muscle Forces

Bench Press Study Comparison of muscle activity between

free weight and machine bench press. Calculated IEMG values during the

ascent and descent phases. Electromyography reveals periods of

electrical activity in a muscle. EMG signal can be used to calculate the

IEMG pattern.

Page 6: Muscle Forces

Bench Press study (cont.) Methods

5 male strength trainers- with previous experience on both free weight and machine bench press.

Data collected in two phases○ Phase 1- 1RM was determined for each subject○ Phase 2- Data was collected during bench press performance of 80%

and 60% of the 1RM Surface electromyography monitored activity in pectoralis major,

anterior deltoid, medial deltoid, triceps, and biceps. Subjects performed 20 trials, 10 free weight, 10 machine (Universal

machine press). 5 trials at 80% and 5 trials at 60%. 2 min rest between sets.○ Used tape recorded command of 3.0 sec during descent, and 2.9 sec

during ascent phases. ○ 5 lift mean for each subject was calculated then used to find group 5 lift

mean.

Page 7: Muscle Forces

Results

Page 8: Muscle Forces

Results (cont.)

Page 9: Muscle Forces

Results (cont.) Results support the hypothesis that greater

muscle activity is present during free weights vs. machine.

Difference most evident in the 60% 1RM. Greatest for the deltoid muscles.IEMG was for anterior and medial deltoids was 50

and 33% higher during free weight. There are individual differences in muscle

activity patterns between the two modes.Possibly having to do with joint and muscle

mechanics.

Page 10: Muscle Forces

Squats Considered one of the best exercises for

increasing size and strength of legs. Used in training programs for many sports,

often performed incorrectly. Muscles used:

Quadriceps HamstringsGlutesErector muscles of the backGastrocnemius

Page 11: Muscle Forces

Squat Study Isometric squat force output and muscle

activity in stable and unstable conditions. Subjects stood either on force plate, or

inflatable balls on top of the force plate. Recorded electromyography

Vastus lateralisVastus medialisBiceps femorisMedial gastrocnemius

Page 12: Muscle Forces

Squat Study (cont.) Methods

Nine college students1 testing session

○ 5 min warm-up○ 4 trials for each condition (25 min rest

between conditions)○ 3 min rest between sets

Page 13: Muscle Forces

Squat Study (cont.)Isometric squat

○ Force platform (BP6001200, AMTI, Watertown, MA)

○ Fixed bar position at a 100 deg knee angle

○ Maximal isometric contraction for 3 sec.

○ Stable performed standing on plate

○ Unstable performed standing on inflatable balance disks (90 cm)

○ Surface electrodes placed on muscles

Page 14: Muscle Forces

Results

Page 15: Muscle Forces

Results (cont.) Peak force and RFD were significantly higher in stable

vs. unstable Average IEMG values for VL and VM were significantly

higher in stable vs. unstable No significant differences were found in muscle activity

for the BF or G. Force output of unstable condition was 54.4% of stable

condition. If stable condition is taken at 100% of maximal strength, the

unstable condition would not meet the intensity requirement of 80% for strength gains

No discernable benefit from performing exercises in unstable vs. stable conditions.


Recommended