Date post: | 04-Jun-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | besplatne-e-knjige |
View: | 219 times |
Download: | 0 times |
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 1/112
pdfcrowd comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Muslims blow up another
Church in NigeriaAdmin / November 26, 2012
It shames me that I am part of a society that not only sanctions this savagery, but demonizes and destroys
those of us who speak against it. This will not end well, folks. The horror is unspeakable, the silence is
Home Articles Qur’an Responses Terrorism News Debates Videos About Me
Contact Me Online Books Links More
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 2/112
pdfcrowd comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
monstrous.
Instead they run this k ind of nonsense.
“Eleven dead, 30 injured in Nigeria church attack” Bangkok Post, November 25, 2012
(hat tipto Armaros)
Two suicide attacks on a church in an army barracks in the northern Nigerian town of Jaji on
Sunday left eleven people dead and 30 injured, the army said.
“Eleven people, mostly worshippers, were killed while 30 are in the hospitals with various
degrees of injuries,” national army spokesman Brigadier General Bola Koleosho told AFP.
A military officer who did not want to be named said the Protestant church was hit by two
explosions.
“The first blast caused no casualties and curious worshippers gathered around the
scene looking at the debris… and that was when the second blast happened,” he said.
Jaji lies some 30 kilometres (20 miles) from the state capital Kaduna city which has been hit in
the past by deadly attacks blamed on the Islamist sect Boko Haram.
The group has often targeted churches in its bloody insurgency, as well as police and other
symbols of the establishment in Nigeria, Africa‘s most populous country which is divided
between a mainly Muslim north and a predominantly Christian south.
The state-run National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) said “rescuers have been
“
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 3/112
pdfcrowd comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Related articles
Muslims blow up another Church in Nigeria, 11 dead, in two homicide bombings
(atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com)
11 killed, many injured at Jaji church explosions (vanguardngr.com)
alerted to an explosion at a military formation in Kaduna state today and likely at a worship
centre”
Although no group has claimed responsibility for Sunday’s church blast, the incident was
similar to previous attacks blamed on the Islamist extremist group.
Last month, at least 10 people were killed and 145 wounded in a suicide church bombing andreprisal violence in Kaduna.
Suicide bombings at three churches in June that were claimed by Boko Haram sparked reprisal
violence by Christian mobs who killed dozens of their Muslim neighbors, burning some of their
victims’ bodies.
Muslim groups also formed mobs and killed several Christians.
Apart from churches, security forces, government officials, and other symbols of authority have
been targeted by Boko Haram fighters.
The group’s insurgency in northern and central Nigeria is believed to have left some 3,000
people dead since 2009, including killings by the security forces.
Boko Haram has claimed to be seeking an Islamic state in Nigeria, Africa’s largest oil
producer.
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 4/112
pdfcrowd comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Rate this: 3 Votes
Spread theWord! Share it:-
12Like Tweet 2 Submit
Share 0
Like this:
Blasts rocks Nigerian army barracks (bigpondnews.com)
Islamists attack Church in Nigeria (waronterrornews.typepad.com)
How suicide bomber rammed into Jaji church (vanguardngr.com)
Twin suicide bombings kill 11 at Nigeria church (newsinfo.inquirer.net)
Nigeria: 11 Dead in Suicide Bombs at Army Church (abcnews.go.com)
Nigeria Suicide Bombings Leave 11 Dead, 30 Injured – Bloomberg (bloomberg.com)
Loading...
t
Digg
Print Email More
Like
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 5/112
pdfcrowd comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Terrorism has a
Religion, and
that is Islam
At Least 64
People Killed,
More Than 190
People Wounded
in Iraq Violence
Brutal Women
Abuse and Rape
Hits India Hard –
Just Another
Case of
Love Jihad?
← Last Mumbai Jihadist Savage Hanged In India “British Muslims Call Conference In Islamabad And
Advocate Jihad Against Non-Muslim Nation” →
November 26, 2012 in Jihad, News . Tags: Africa, Allah, Bangkok Pos t, Blood, Boko Haram, Captives, Chris tians,
Church in Nigeria, Faith Freedom, Hadith, homicide bombings, human-rights, Islam, Islamic Lies, Islamic
Terrorists, Jihad, Kaduna, Kaduna State, libya, Mass Murder, middle-east, Most Intolerant Religion, Muhammad,
muham mad pbuh, Murder, national emergency management agency, Nigeria, politics, prophet muhammad,
Protestantism, Rahul Raj, religion, Suicide attack, terrorism , The False Prophet
Related posts
12 thoughts on “Muslims blow up another Church in Nigeria”
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 6/112
pdfcrowd comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
plum November 28, 2012 at 7:46 am
Hi Dear Raj, since your heart is so “saddened” by the Boko guys why don’t you cheer up by
writing an article on Israelist too, killing more than 300 Muslim women and children and
injuring over 2000 in the recent attacks on poor Ghazians, on whom they curb food supplies
and medicines and steal their land by “settlements”?
In reference to Boko guys, you asserted, “It shames me that I am part of a society that not
only sanctions this savagery, but demonizes and destroys those of us who speak against it .
This will not end well, folks. The horror is unspeakable, the s ilence is monstrous.”
So, what do you mean by “This will not end well, folks”?
Of course, by all means, those groups who kill, maim and destroy houses of worship should
be rooted and destroyed. But whose creation is the Nigerian Taliban? Besides Churches
they even bomb Mosques and kill their Muslim leaders!!
Yes, they should be uprooted and destroyed utterly as they have gone against The Quran!
The Boko Haram is a terrorist group and labelled by the CNN, a biased Network, as Islamist
terrorist group when no Islamic country condones their actions or recognizes them!
Finally, your sad heart should rest at peace now because a good number of Muslims die on
daily bases all over the world by the hands of your sympathetic mentors!
Regards
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 7/112
pdfcrowd comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Plum
0 0 Rate This
Reply
Humanity Triumphs December 7, 2012 at 11:19 am
Hey Plum Dude! Your way of starting this discussion is funny. Let me test your
comments on historical facts.
Yes, Israelists have killed many muslims BUT what is the reason? When USA
killed it was oil, when Israel did, it was political reason. BUT when muslims kill, it
is religious reason. That’s why – terrorism is associated with religion – Islam.
Let us see what Zionists have done. Death of 300 and injury of 2000 is negligible
compared to what I tell you now.
Which Zionist led to Algerian civil war of 1990 – 1998 leading to murder of 0.20
million innocent civilians ?
Which Zionist led to Libyan – Chad war of 1978 – 1987 leading to murder of 8.5
thousand troops ?
Which Zionist led to Chad civil war of 2005 – 2009 leading to murder of 0.35 million
innocent civilians ? 1.70 millions were wounded and many refugees from Sudan
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 8/112
pdfcrowd comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
and Africa as well.
Which Zionist led to Sudan conflict of 1950 – 2005 leading to murder of 2.60
million innocent civilians displacing 5 million ?
Which Zionist led to Somalian civil war of 1977 – 2012 leading to murder of 0.50
million innocent civilians ?
Which Zionist led to Lebanese civil war of 1975 – 1990 leading to murder of 0.23
million innocent civilians, wounding a million and displacing 0.35 million ?
Which Zionist led to Syrian civil war of 1982 leading to murder of 0.40 million
innocent civilians and in 2012 leading to another 43,192 casualties ?
Which Zionist led to Jordan civil war of Black September 1970 leading to murder of 10 thousand innocent civilians ?
Which Zionist led to Turkey – Kurdistan war of 1984 – 2011 leading to murder of
0.40 million innocent civilians displacing over a million Kurds villagers ?
Which Zionist led to Kurdistan – Iraq war of 1961 – 1970 leading to murder of 105
thousand innocent civilians ?
Which Zionist led to Saddam Hussein of 1979 – 2003 leading to murder of a
million innocent civilians ?
Which Zionist led to Iran civil war of 1978 – 1979 leading to 80,000 casualties ?
Which Zionist led to Iran – Iraq conflict of 1980 – 1988 leading to murder of a
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 9/112
df d mi b PRO i Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
million innocent civilians and displacing 2 million others ?
Which Zionist led to Tajikistan conflict of 1992 – 1997 leading to murder of 50,000
innocent civilians displacing 0.70 million ?
Which Zionist led to Bangladesh – Pakistan war of 1971 – 1974 leading to murder
of 1.50 million innocent civilians ?
Which Zionist led to Indonesian war of 1965 – 1966 leading to murder of 0.40
million innocent civilians ?
Which Zionist led to East Timor war of 1975 – 1999 leading to murder of 200
thousand innocent civilians ?
Which Zionist led to Muanmar Gaddafi of 2011 leading to murder of 10,000innocent civilians ?
If we add up murders by Muslims on Muslims, it is more than population of
Zionists themselves. Only 100,000 Arabs are killed by Israel so far. This is
negligible compared to Muslim – Muslim wars. All the casualties by Israel were
merely for self defense. The Arabs wanted to wipe out Israel from world map and
exterminate Jews.
REALITY Islam is a violent religion. In muslim nations, NON muslims don’t exist
and hence muslims kill muslims there.
Quran 2:216
Qital (massacre in the cause of God) is ordained for you (Muslims), though
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 10/112
df di b PRO i Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
you dislike it. But it is possible that you dislike a thing which is good for
you, and like a thing which is bad for you. But God knows, and you know
not.
Quran 3:142
Did ye think that ye would enter Heaven without Allah testing those of you
who fought hard for GOD (i.e., Jihad) and remained steadfast?
So, no terrorist person be it Taliban, Al Qaeda etc. violates Quran. Terrorism is an
act for GOD as per Quran 2:216. So, all muslim clerics who do not recoognize
Taliban etc. is same as muslims not recognizing respective Quranic verses.
Terrorism is every muslim’s religious duty as per Quran 2:216 and 3:142 followed
by 164 other verses legalizing terrorism.
You know why Hitler raged a World War ? Because all muslims supported him.
Had no muslim supported Hitler, world war would not have happened at all. Hitler
was highly peaceful when he was a Christian. BUT when he converted to Islam, he
became a tyrant ordering massacre of 10 million innocent Jews. Hitler’s Mein
Kampf is translated as My Jihad.
When Muslims k ill millions of innocent Jews that is termed worship of Allah andwhen Jews fight for self defense, that is oppression.
All this proves that NO Muslim is interested to resolve the Arab – Israel conflict.
Rather, they are exploiting the situation to promote their political agenda –
massacre of innocents.
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 11/112
df di b PRO i A d l ? T t th HTML t PDF API
0 0 Rate This
Reply
Bob December 7, 2012 at 4:06 pm
ALL Mohammedans are psychopathic; some more deranged than
others, while others in the Closet practicing TAQIYAH: LYING IN ISLAM.
Taqiyah is sanctioned by the Sunni Muslim medieval theologian, Abu
Hāmed Mohammad ibn Mohammad al-Ghazzālī of the Shafi school. Its
use is clearly much wider than saving of lives. The “best” type of Taqiyah
according to some authorities is Tawriah. In Tawriah, a kind of Delphic
practice, the speaker makes the “mark” believe that they are agreeing
with them through ambiguity, whereas in fact they may be saying the
opposite. For example, the slogan “Islam is the religion of peace” has an
ambiguous meaning, since for Muslims, the peace is to be found only
through surrender to Allah.
MUSLIM RAPE JIHAD
Why as a Muslim and a mother I believe it’s so damaging to hide from
the truth about Asian sex gangs
By YASMIN ALIBHAI – BROWN
PUBLISHED: 00:52 GMT, 21 November 2012 | UPDATED: 08:21 GMT,
23 November 2012
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 12/112df di b PRO i A d l ? T t th HTML t PDF API
A bleak, stomach-turning report on child sex abuse by gangs was
published yesterday by the Office of the Children’s Commission.
It recounts how, between 2010 and 2011, more than 2,500 children —
mostly girls — were groomed, repeatedly violated, sold, beaten and
terrorised.
Thousands more remain invisible and unheard. The report concludes that
agencies that should have helped them didn’t hear their stories or look
after them as they should have.
The Children’s Commission has published a report on child sex abuse
by gangs
But, ironically, the report writers, too, try hard to side-step some difficult
facts and even warn the rest of us from going where they have chosen
not to tread.Here is what Sue Berelowitz, the Deputy Children’s Commissioner who
led the inquiry, has to say: ‘Perpetrators come from all ethnic groups,
and so do their victims — contrary to what some may wish to believe.’
Yes, we know they come from all backgrounds. But that rather cutting
second line is directed at people like me who believe that in some British
cities — especially in the North of England — circles of sexual hell for
young girls are run by gangs of Muslim men (most of Pakistani or
Bangladeshi heritage) who mostly prey on white girls.
The inquiry was led by Deputy Children’s Commissioner Sue Berelowitz
To generalise their crimes, and lump them in with all the other abusers
across the country, is to deny what the victims of these men and their
families are saying about the abuse that has gone on.
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 13/112df di b PRO i
Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
As an Asian woman, feminist, mother, Muslim and lifelong anti-racist, I
cannot meekly accept Ms Berelowitz’s directive. We need clear and
honest figures to show how race and ethnicity are linked to these
unspeakable crimes.
After all, we have ethnic details for burglaries, stop-and-search,
conviction rates and prison sentencing. Anti-racists base their
campaigns on such information.So why the squeamishness about gang sex exploitation? I think it is
because — like a number of police officers and social workers who have
been presented with such evidence in the past — the committee in
charge of the report are nervous of causing offence to community
leaders, of being thought racists.
Perhaps they fear the information will be used by the BNP or English
Defence League to whip up hatred.
It is misplaced sensitivity. Committed racists will behave as they wish:
we cannot let that determine what the public can or cannot know.
Of course the majority of sex abusers are white because the majority of
the population is white. Blond paedophile Jimmy Savile did not hail from
Pakistan, but was home-grown.
The report points out that 28 per cent of the victims they found were of
black and Asian background.
But it doesn’t state what it should have: that some of the worst long-term
abuse is carried out by mainly British Pakistani men targeting lost young
white girls, often from troubled or poor families.
A 2010 police intelligence report stated there was a significant problem
ith f A i l t f th M li l iti hit
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 14/112df di b PRO iAre you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
with gangs of Asian males, most of them Muslim, exploiting young white
females.
The children are neglected and hungry for love. The men offer treats, car
rides and kebabs, then drugs and alcohol; and then they corrupt them.
Even more tragically, when teachers and doctors express concern, too
many in social services and the police dismiss the girls as
‘promiscuous’, ‘available’ and not worth their attention and care.
Of course, the kind of entrapment, grooming and abuse being described
here is carried out by white gangs, too, and they are as hateful and
bestial as their Asian counterparts.
But with the latter, there has been for too long a suppression of the
whole truth.The reason I feel compelled to write about these particular groomers and
rapists is because I am Asian, and I know how their repugnant activities
are rebounding on all of us and on good Asian men.
The internet is rife with horrifying stories about such gangs. They are a
mix of fact and fiction. More dangerously still, the British public is
starting to think that we Asians hide and excuse the child rapists —
and, that way, we all become sinners.
Every Asian and Muslim I know, including some imams, want these
monsters exposed, named and put away.
But not all of them, I admit, want to delve deeper and confront some of
the values that drive such men to prey on white females.
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 15/112df di b PRO iAre you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
This is where it gets tricky. It is easy to loathe the abusers, but much
harder to ask what it is about some Asian cultural assumptions that
make the paedophiles feel no guilt or shame about what they do.
Mohammed Shafiq, director of the Lancashire-based Ramadhan
Foundation, a charity working for ethnic harmony, has warned:
‘The police are over-cautious because they fear being branded racist’
Mohammed Shafiq, chief executive of the Ramadhan Foundation, a brave
and principled man, is one of the few to examine and question these
underlying att itudes.
He acknowledges that to some Muslim men, white females are thoughteasy game, ‘asking for it’, while those men’s wives or girlfriends are
hyper-protected.
Many abusers are sexually frustrated and cannot relate to women
except as objects of one kind or another. For this new report to shy
away from this vital dimension is cowardly — and, in its way, another
betrayal of the victims.
One of these poor girls contacted me after hearing me a few times on aLondon radio show on which I was talking about gangs of Asian men in
Rochdale. She and I met in a small cafe in the summer. She is now 16,
but looks much younger, and is painfully thin. A charity is looking after
her.
A British Pakistani man who became her pimp (she had to call him
‘Master’) found her outside a chip shop paid for a big portion of fries
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 16/112
Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Master ) found her outside a chip shop, paid for a big portion of fries,
took her for a drive and violently raped her in the back of the car that
same night.
She was 14, living with a mother who was an alcoholic and on benefits,
and a young half-brother.
Abusers: The men who took part in a child sex ring which exploited
vulnerable teenage girls Abdul Rauf, Hamid Safi, Mohammed Sajid and
Abdul Aziz. Abdul Qayyum, Adil Khan, Mohammed Amin and Kabeer
Hassan. Afterwards, the man gave her a £20 note. She had never had so
much cash in her hand.
And so it went on. She was passed from man to man, was infected with
a sexually transmitted disease, then told her teacher, who took her to a
clinic and tried to get her to tell the police.But the girl was too scared to do that. The men, by then, were violent
and threatened her. She wanted to meet me, she said, to ask why Asian
men were ‘like animals’ — a question that felt like a stab through my
heart.
They are not, I told her; only a few — but those few were very bad. She
will never believe me. And those who came to learn what happened to
her now think as she does.
For her sake, and for the sake of others like her, the Children’s
Commission report needed to attend to specifics, and not vague
generalities about perpetrators.
It does, in fact, acknowledge that ‘there is more than one type of
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 17/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
perpetrator, model and approach’.
But then it backs off from giving us details about the different
perpetrators, models and approaches, because, I believe, that would
mean scrutinising Asian gangs (which some police forces have found
commit most sexual crimes against girls in some areas).
Frankly, I think it’s deplorable that the panel chosen to collate this report
was almost all white. If they’d had assertive and scrupulous Asian
members, perhaps we would have got a more full and truthful document.
I would never betray British Asians and Muslims, or portray them
unfairly. They are my people. But breaking the taboo of silence that
surrounds the exploitation by Asian men of white girls is a duty we
insiders must not shirk.
These girls are someone’s child, grandchild, sister, niece. They are our
daughters, too — and we owe them more than we do their rapists.
Saturday, 17 March 2012
Muslim Rape Epidemic in Europe
In March this year, native Dutch residents of the city of Utrecht rioted toprotest against harassment by Muslim youths and government inaction
to stop this. The Dutch authorities immediately suppressed the riots by
sealing off the area and installing surveillance cameras to control Dutch
non-Muslims, but they have done virtually nothing to address the
underlying problem of Muslim violence. And this is far from unique to the
Netherlands.
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 18/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Sweden experienced a quadrupling in the number of rape charges in the
space of a single generation. Yet Sweden’s largest newspaper
Aftonbladet recently indicated that the spike in rape numbers was due to
the “warm weather,” which would presumably mean that these rapes are
caused by global warming. The fact that many of the suspects have a
Muslim background is purely coincidental, no doubt.
The Dutch Crown Prince Willem-Alexander is worried about the “sharp
tone” of the debate surrounding Muslim immigration, and reminds his
countrymen that “speech is silver, silence is golden.” Apparently, the
rest of the Dutch political class shares this view, relieved that Pim
Fortuyn was silenced through murder and Ayaan Hirsi Ali was driven out
of the country.
I hear some observers say that the political elites in Western Europe are
“powerless” to stop Jihad street violence. But they are extremely
aggressive in suppressing critic ism of continued Muslim immigration,
which indicates that they are not powerless, they are actively hostile to
native non-Muslims. It’s time Europeans realize that, and act
accordingly.
This came from the Dutch press:
Dozens of boys and girls have been systematically abused, intimidated
and molested by a group of older boys in the Utrecht neighbourhood of
Overvecht for almost a year, the Telegraaf reports. Municipal council
member Bouchra Dibi (Labour PvdA) investigated the incidents taking
place at the playground near the Neckardreef in Overvecht.
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 19/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Children aged 8, 9 and 10 were dragged into the bushes and coerced
into performing sexual acts on boys a few years older. Most of the
children involved are of Moroccan background, the newspaper reports.
The municipal council member told the Telegraaf that the problems are
not being addressed. “This has been going on for almost a year. People
just talk and talk and talk. And nothing is done,” she said.
Social workers, police and the municipality do not know how to approach
the parents, Dibi says. “These sorts of things are taboo to talk about in
the Moroccan community.” Utrecht Mayor Annie Brouwer-Korf (PvdA)
acknowledges that there have been problems among children since the
end of last year. “Intimidation, threats and fights, and, since the
beginning of this year we have seen signals of sexual abuse. A report of
sexual molestation by children has been passed on to the publicprosecution department,” the mayor says.
Brouwer says it is difficult to get an idea of how widespread the abuses
are because there is no concrete information on suspects, victims and
locations. Council member Dibi says this is mainly due to parents’
hesitance to report incidents. “Parents do not dare say anything
because they are afraid of the perpetrators. There is a great deal of fear.
That is why they don’t always report these things.”
Meanwhile the Dutch Labour Party (PvdA) tries to silence Ehsan Jami, a
Muslim apostate who is a local Labour politician in Leidschendam-
Voorburg. The 22 year old Jami intends to establish an international
organization of ex-Muslims. An internal memo sent to Labour
parliamentarians and ministers, shows that the party fears that Jami’s
campaign will cause it electoral damage and enrage Muslims The party
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 20/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
campaign will cause it electoral damage and enrage Muslims. The party
wants Jami to consider the fact that his initiative will go down badly with
the PvdA’s immigrant following. The Dutch press revealed that Jami
received hate mail from PvdA executives.
Task Force Europa: First there were the Danish cartoons riots, death
threats and hatred, Then the Islamist riots in Paris that burned for days,
now Dutch children are being raped by these Islamic Nazi thugs?
Europe and the rest of Western Civilization needs to grow a spine, and
sharpish!
Even America’s war on terrorism is bogging down due to political
correctness and the injection of multiculturalism into their society.
Modern day liberalism will be the death of us all since the Islamofascists
consider this strain of liberalism as weakness, appeasement and
cowardice. The Islamofascist bloodthirst for power and worldwide
domination will only grow in the face of this liberal cowardice.
0 0 Rate This
Reply
plum December 8, 2012 at 9:58 am
Hi HD Dude,
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 21/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Yes it is true that every Muslim is ordered to fight in defense of religion of
Islam. But only for Islam and injustices. Quran doesn’t allow Muslims to
fight each other or for selfish gains, that would be against the Quran!
Inter State as well as those of State to State wars have always occurred
from time immemorial, among nations of whatsoever beliefs. Remember
the Indo – China War?
Also, k indly, provide references/link to the above, one sided alleges,
which you forgot to give.
Regards
Plum
0 0 Rate This
Reply
Bob December 8, 2012 at 11:48 am
YOU ARE JUST PLUM CRAZY IF YOU THINK NON
MOHAMMEDANS BELIEVE THAT MOHAMMEDANS ARE
PEACE LOVING PEOPLE!
Violence
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 22/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Question:
Does the Quran really contain dozens of verses promoting
violence?
Summary Answer:
The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to
war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are
quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers
and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do
not join the fight are called ‘hypocrites’ and warned that Allah
will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter.
Unlike nearly all of the Old Testament verses of violence, theverses of violence in the Quran are mostly open-ended,
meaning that they are not restrained by the historical context
of the surrounding text. They are part of the eternal,
unchanging word of Allah, and just as relevant or subjective as
anything else in the Quran.
Most of today’s Muslims exercise a personal choice to
interpret their holy book’s many calls to violence according to
what their own moral preconceptions find justificable.
Apologists cater to their preferences with tenuous arguments
that gloss over historical fact and generally do not stand up to
scrutiny. Still, it is important to note that the problem is not
bad people, but bad ideology.
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 23/112
Q (2 244) “Th fi ht i th f All h d k
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 24/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Quran (2:244) – “Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know
that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things.”
Quran (2:216) – “Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike
it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for
you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah
knoweth, and ye know not.” Not only does this verse establishthat violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth
that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the
audience was obviously not under attack at the time. From the
Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that
Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into
raiding merchant caravans for loot.
Quran (3:56) – “As to those who reject faith, I will punish them
with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will
they have anyone to help.”
Quran (3:151) – “Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of
the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for
which He had sent no authority”. This speaks directly of
polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believein the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be
‘joining companions to Allah’).
Quran (4:74) – “Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the
life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of
Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow
a vast reward.” The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 25/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Christians, led meekly to the slaughter. These Muslims are
killed in battle, as they attempt to inflict death and destruction
for the cause of Allah. Here is the theological basis for today’s
suicide bombers.
Quran (4:76) – “Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…”
Quran (4:89) – “They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as
they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take
not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah
(From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize
them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case)
take no friends or helpers from their ranks.”
Quran (4:95) – “Not equal are those believers who sit (at home)
and receive no hurt, and those who strive and fight in the cause
of Allah with their goods and their persons. Allah hath granted
a grade higher to those who strive and fight with their goods
and persons than to those who sit (at home). Unto all (in Faith)
Hath Allah promised good: But those who strive and fight Hath
He distinguished above those who sit (at home) by a special
reward,-” This passage criticizes “peaceful” Muslims who do
not join in the violence, letting them know that they are less
worthy in Allah’s eyes. It also demolishes the modern myth
that “Jihad” doesn’t mean holy war in the Quran, but rather a
spiritual struggle. Not only is the Arabic word used in this
passage, but it is c learly not referring to anything spiritual,
since the physically disabled are given exemption. (The Hadith
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 26/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
reveals the context of the passage to be in response to a blind
man’s protest that he is unable to engage in Jihad and this is
reflected in other translations of the verse).
Quran (4:104) – “And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the
enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as
you suffer pain…” Is pursuing an injured and retreating enemy
really an act of self-defense?
Quran (5:33) – “The punishment of those who wage war against
Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the
land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or
their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or
they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for themin this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous
chastisement”
Quran (8:12) – “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who
disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every
fingertip of them” No reasonable person would interpret this to
mean a spiritual struggle.
Quran (8:15) – “O ye who believe! When ye meet those who
disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on
that day turneth his back to them, unless maneuvering for
battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath
from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey’s
end.”
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 27/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Quran (8:39) – “And fight with them until there is no more fitna
(disorder, unbelief) and religion should be only for Allah” Some
translations interpret “fitna” as “persecution”, but the traditional
understanding of this word is not supported by the historical
context (See notes for 2:293, also). The Meccans were simply
refusing Muhammad access to their city during Haj. Other
Muslims were allowed to travel there – just not as an armed
group, since Muhammad had declared war on Mecca prior to
his eviction. The Meccans were also acting in defense of their
religion, since it was Muhammad’s intention to destroy their
idols and establish Islam by force (which he later did). Hence
the critical part of this verse is to fight until “religion is only for
Allah”, meaning that the true justification of violence was theunbelief of the opposition. According to the Sira (Ibn
Ishaq/Hisham 324) Muhammad further explains that “Allah
must have no rivals.”
Quran (8:57) – “If thou comest on them in the war, deal with
them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that
haply they may remember.”
Quran (8:59-60) – “And let not those who disbelieve suppose
that they can outstrip (Allah’s Purpose). Lo! they cannot
escape. Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force
and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy
of Allah and your enemy.”
Quran (8:65) – “O Prophet, exhort the believers to fight…”
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 28/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Quran (9:5) – “So when the sacred months have passed away,
then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them
captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every
ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the
poor-rate, leave their way free to them.” According to this
verse, the best way of staying safe from Muslim violence is to
convert to Islam (prayer (salat) and the poor tax (zakat) are
among the religion’s Five Pillars). This popular claim that the
Quran only inspires violence within the context of self-defense
is seriously challenged by this passage as well, since the
Muslims to whom it was written were obviously not under
attack. Had they been, then there would have been no waiting
period (earlier verses make it a duty for Muslims to fight in self-
defense, even during the sacred months).
Quran (9:14) – “Fight them, Allah will punish them by your
hands and bring them to disgrace…”
Quran (9:20) – “Those who believe, and have left their homes
and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah’s way are of
much greater worth in Allah’s sight. These are they who are
triumphant.” The Arabic word interpreted as “striving” in this
verse is the same root as “Jihad”. The context is obviously holy
war.
Quran (9:29) – “Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the
Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by
Allah and His Messenger nor acknowledge the religion of
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 29/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of
Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they
pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves
subdued.” “People of the Book” refers to Christians and Jews.
According to this verse, they are to be violently subjugated,
with the sole justification being their religious status. This was
one of the final “revelations” from Allah and it set in motion the
tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad’s
companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian
world in the next 100 years. Islam is intended to dominate all
other people and faiths.
Quran (9:30) – “And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah;
and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; theseare the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those
who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are
turned away!”
Quran (9:38-39) – “O ye who believe! what is the matter with
you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah,
ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world
to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as
compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish
you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place.” This
is a warning to those who refuse to fight, that they will be
punished with Hell.
Quran (9:41) – “Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and
strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 30/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That
is best for you if ye but knew.” See also the verse that follows
(9:42) – “If there had been immediate gain (in sight), and the
journey easy, they would (all) without doubt have followed thee,
but the distance was long, (and weighed) on them” This
contradicts the myth that Muslims are to fight only in self-
defense, since the wording implies that battle will be waged a
long distance from home (in another country and on Christian
soil, in this case, according to the historians).
Quran (9:73) – “O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers
and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode
is hell, and evil is the destination.” Dehumanizing those who
reject Islam, by reminding Muslims that they are merelyfirewood for Hell, makes it easier to justify slaughter. It also
explains why today’s devout Muslims have little regard for
those outside the faith.
Quran (9:88) – “But the Messenger, and those who believe with
him, strive and fight with their wealth and their persons: for
them are (all) good things: and it is they who will prosper.”
Quran (9:111) – “Allah hath purchased of the believers their
persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of
Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a
promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel,
and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than
Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded:
that is the achievement supreme ”
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 31/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
that is the achievement supreme.
Quran (9:123) – “O you who believe! fight those of the
unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you
hardness.”
Quran (17:16) – “And when We wish to destroy a town, Wesend Our commandment to the people of it who lead easy
lives, but they transgress therein; thus the word proves true
against it, so We destroy it with utter destruction.” Note that
the crime is moral transgression, and the punishment is “utter
destruction.” (Before ordering the 9/11 attacks, Osama bin
Laden first issued Americans an invitation to Islam).
Quran (18:65-81) – This parable lays the theological
groundwork for honor killings, in which a family member is
murdered because they brought shame to the family, either
through apostasy or perceived moral indiscretion. The story
(which is not found in any Jewish or Christian source) tells of
Moses encountering a man with “special knowledge” who does
things which don’t seem to make sense on the surface, but are
then justified according to later explanation. One such action is
to murder a youth for no apparent reason (74). However, the
wise man later explains that it was feared that the boy would
“grieve” his parents by “disobedience and ingratitude.” He was
killed so that Allah could provide them a ‘better’ son. (Note:
This is one reason why honor killing is sanctioned by Sharia.
Reliance of the Traveler (Umdat al-Saliq) says that punishment
for murder is not applicable when a parent or grandparent kills
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 32/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
for murder is not applicable when a parent or grandparent kills
their offspring (o.1.1-2).)
Quran (21:44) – “We gave the good things of this life to these
men and their fathers until the period grew long for them; See
they not that We gradually reduce the land (in their control)
from its outlying borders? Is it then they who will win?”
Quran (25:52) – “Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but
strive against them with the utmost strenuousness…” “Strive
against” is Jihad – obviously not in the personal context. It’s
also significant to point out that this is a Meccan verse.
Quran (33:60-62) – “If the hypocrites, and those in whose
hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease,
We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be
your neighbors in it but a little while. Accursed, they will be
seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter.” This
passage sanctions the slaughter (rendered “merciless” and
“horrible murder” in other translations) against three groups:
Hypocrites (Muslims who refuse to “fight in the way of Allah”
(3:167) and hence don’t act as Muslims should), those with
“diseased hearts” (which include Jews and Christians 5:51-52),
and “alarmists” or “agitators who include those who merely
speak out against Islam, according to Muhammad’s
biographers. It is worth noting that the victims are to be sought
out by Muslims, which is what today’s terrorists do. If this
passage is meant merely to apply to the city of Medina, then it
is unclear why it is included in Allah’s eternal word to Muslim
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 33/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
y
generations.
Quran (47:3-4) – “Those who reject Allah follow vanities, while
those who believe follow the truth from their lord. Thus does
Allah set forth form men their lessons by similitude. Therefore
when you meet in battle those who disbelieve, then smite thenecks until when you have overcome them, then make (them)
prisoners,” Those who reject Allah are to be subdued in battle.
The verse goes on to say the only reason Allah doesn’t do the
dirty work himself is in order to to test the faithfulness of
Muslims. Those who kill pass the test. “But if it had been
Allah’s Will, He could certainly have exacted retribution from
them (Himself); but (He lets you fight) in order to test you,some with others. But those who are slain in the Way of
Allah,- He will never let their deeds be lost.”
Quran (47:35) – “Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for
peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir: “have the upper
hand”) for Allah is with you,”
Quran (48:17) – “There is no blame for the blind, nor is there
blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go
not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His
messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which
rivers flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a
painful doom.” Contemporary apologists sometimes claim that
Jihad means ‘spiritual struggle.’ Is so, then why are the blind,
lame and sick exempted? This verse also says that those who
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 34/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
p y
do not fight will suffer torment in hell.
Quran (48:29) – “Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And
those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and
merciful among themselves” Islam is not about treating
everyone equally. There are two very distinct standards that areapplied based on religious status. Also the word used for ‘hard’
or ‘ruthless’ in this verse shares the same root as the word
translated as ‘painful’ or severe’ in verse 16.
Quran (61:4) – “Surely Allah loves those who fight in His way”
Religion of Peace, indeed! This is followed by (61:9): “He it is
who has sent His Messenger (Mohammed) with guidance and
the religion of truth (Islam) to make it victorious over all
religions even though the infidels may resist.”
Quran (61:10-12) – “O ye who believe! Shall I lead you to a
bargain that will save you from a grievous Penalty?- That ye
believe in Allah and His Messenger, and that ye strive (your
utmost) in the Cause of Allah, with your property and your
persons: That will be best for you, if ye but knew! He will forgive
you your sins, and admit you to Gardens beneath which Rivers
flow, and to beautiful mansions in Gardens of Eternity.” This
verse was given in battle. It uses the Arabic word, Jihad.
Quran (66:9) – “O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and
the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home,
a hapless journey’s end.” The root word of “Jihad” is used again
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 35/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
here. The context is clearly holy war, and the scope of violence
is broadened to include “hypocrites” – those who call
themselves Muslims but do not act as such.
From the Hadith:
Bukhari (52:177) – Allah’s Apostle said, “The Hour will not be
established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind
which a Jew will be hiding will say. “O Muslim! There is a Jew
hiding behind me, so kill him.”
Bukhari (52:256) – The Prophet… was asked whether it was
permissible to attack the pagan warriors at night with the
probability of exposing their women and children to danger. The
Prophet replied, “They (i.e. women and children) are from them
(i.e. pagans).” In this command, Muhammad establishes that it
is permissible to kill non-combatants in the process of killing a
perceived enemy. This provides justification for the many
Islamic terror bombings.
Bukhari (52:220) – Allah’s Apostle said… ‘I have been madevictorious with terror’
Abu Dawud (14:2526) – The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him)
said: Three things are the roots of faith: to refrain from (killing)
a person who utters, “There is no god but Allah” and not to
declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and not to
excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad
will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 36/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as
a prophet until the day the last member of my community will
fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist)
Abu Dawud (14:2527) – The Prophet said: Striving in the path
of Allah (jihad) is incumbent on you along with every ruler,
whether he is pious or impious
Muslim (1:33) – the Messenger of Allah said: I have been
commanded to fight against people till they test ify that there is
no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah
Bukhari (8:387) – Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to
fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to beworshipped but Allah’. And if they say so, pray like our
prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then
their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not
interfere with them except legally.”
Muslim (1:30) – “The Messenger of Allah said: I have been
commanded to fight against people so long as they do not
declare that there is no god but Allah.”
Bukhari (11:626) – [Muhammad said:] “I decided to order a
man to lead the prayer and then take a flame to burn all those,
who had not left their houses for the prayer, burning them alive
inside their homes.”
Muslim (1:149) – “Abu Dharr reported: I said: Messenger of
Allah which of the deeds is the best? He (the Holy Prophet)
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 37/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Allah, which of the deeds is the best? He (the Holy Prophet)
replied: Belief in Allah and Jihad in His cause…”
Muslim (20:4645) – “…He (the Messenger of Allah) did that
and said: There is another act which elevates the position of a
man in Paradise to a grade one hundred (higher), and the
elevation between one grade and the other is equal to the
height of the heaven from the earth. He (Abu Sa’id) said: What
is that act? He replied: Jihad in the way of Allah! Jihad in the
way of Allah!”
Muslim (20:4696) – “the Messenger of Allah (may peace be
upon him) said: ‘One who died but did not fight in the way of
Allah nor did he express any desire (or determination) for Jihiddied the death of a hypocrite.’”
Muslim (19:4321-4323) – Three separate hadith in which
Muhammad shrugs over the news that innocent children were
killed in a raid by his men against unbelievers. His response:
“They are of them (meaning the enemy).”
Muslim (19:4294) – “When the Messenger of Allah (may peace
be upon him) appointed anyone as leader of an army or
detachment he would especially exhort him… He would say:
Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight
against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war…
When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them
to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these,
you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 38/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you,
accept it from them and desist from fighting against them… If
they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If
they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands.
If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them.
Tabari 7:97 The morning after the murder of Ashraf, the Prophet
declared, “Kill any Jew who falls under your power.” Ashraf was
a poet, killed by Muhammad’s men because he insulted Islam.
Here, Muhammad widens the scope of his orders to kill. An
innocent Jewish businessman was then slain by his Muslim
partner, merely for being non-Muslim.
Tabari 9:69 “Killing Unbelievers is a small matter to us” The
words of Muhammad, prophet of Islam.
Tabari 17:187 “‘By God, our religion (din) from which we have
departed is better and more correct than that which these
people follow. Their religion does not stop them from shedding
blood, terrifying the roads, and seizing properties.’ And they
returned to their former religion.” The words of a group of Christians who had converted to Islam, but realized their error
after being shocked by the violence and looting committed in
the name of Allah. The price of their decision to return to a
religion of peace was that the men were beheaded and the
woman and children enslaved by the caliph Ali.
Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 327: – “Allah said, ‘A prophet must slaughter
before collecting captives. A slaughtered enemy is driven from
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 39/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
g p g y
the land. Muhammad, you craved the desires of this world, its
goods and the ransom captives would bring. But Allah desires
killing them to manifest the religion.’”
Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 990: – Lest anyone think that cutting off
someone’s head while screaming ‘Allah Akbar!’ is a modern
creation, here is an account of that very practice under
Muhammad, who seems to approve.
Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 992: – “Fight everyone in the way of Allah
and kill those who disbelieve in Allah.” Muhammad’s
instructions to his men prior to a military raid.
Additional Notes:
Other than the fact that Muslims haven’t killed every non-
Muslim under their domain, there is very little else that they
can point to as proof that theirs is a peaceful, tolerant religion.
Where Islam is dominant (as in the Middle East and Pakistan)
religious minorities suffer brutal persecution with little
resistance. Where Islam is in the minority (as in Thailand, the
Philippines and Europe) there is the threat of violence if Muslim
demands are not met. Either situation seems to provide a
justification for religious terrorism, which is persistent and
endemic to Islamic fundamentalism.
The reasons are obvious and begin with the Quran. Few verses
of Islam’s most sacred text can be construed to fit the
contemporary virtues of religious tolerance and universal
b th h d Th th t d li “M ” hi h
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 40/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
brotherhood. Those that do are earlier “Meccan” verses which
are obviously abrogated by later ones. This is why Muslim
apologists speak of the “risks” of trying to interpret the Quran
without their “assistance” – even while claiming that it is a
perfect book.
Far from being mere history or theological construct, the violent
verses of the Quran have played a key role in very real
massacre and genocide. This includes the brutal slaughter of
tens of millions of Hindus for five centuries beginning around
1000 AD with Mahmud of Ghazni’s bloody conquest. Both he
and the later Tamerlane (Islam’s Genghis Khan) slaughtered an
untold number merely for defending their temples from
destruction. Buddhism was very nearly wiped off the Indian
subcontinent. Judaism and Christianity met the same fate
(albeit more slowly) in areas conquered by Muslim armies,
including the Middle East, North Africa and parts of Europe,
including today’s Turkey. Zoroastrianism, the ancient religion of
a proud Persian people is despised by Muslims and barely
survives in modern Iran.
So ingrained is violence in the religion that Islam has never
really stopped being at war, either with other religions or with
itself.
Muhammad was a military leader, laying siege to towns,
massacring the men, raping their women, enslaving their
children, and taking the property of others as his own. On
l i h j t d ff f d f th
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 41/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
several occasions he rejected offers of surrender from the
besieged inhabitants and even butchered captives. He actually
inspired his followers to battle when they did not feel it was
right to fight, promising them slaves and booty if they did and
threatening them with Hell if they did not. Muhammad allowed
his men to rape traumatized women captured in battle, usuallyon the very day their husbands and family members were
slaughtered.
It is important to emphasize that, for the most part, Muslim
armies waged aggressive campaigns, and the religion’s most
dramatic military conquests were made by the actual
companions of Muhammad in the decades following his death.
The early Islamic principle of warfare was that the civilian
population of a town was to be destroyed (ie. men executed,
women and children taken as slaves) if they defended
themselves. Although modern apologists often claim that
Muslims are only supposed to attack in self-defense, this is an
oxymoron that is flatly contradicted by the accounts of Islamic
historians and others that go back to the time of Muhammad.
Consider the example of the Qurayza Jews, who were
completely obliterated only five years after Muhammad arrived
in Medina. Their leader opted to stay neutral when their town
was besieged by a Meccan army that was sent to take
revenge for Muhammad’s deadly caravan raids. The tribe killed
no one from either side and even surrendered peacefully to
Muhammad after the Meccans had been turned back. Yet the
prophet of Islam had every male member of the Qurayza
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 42/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
prophet of Islam had every male member of the Qurayza
beheaded, and every woman and child enslaved, even raping
one of the captives himself (what Muslim apologists might refer
to as “same day marriage”).
One of Islam’s most revered modern scholars, Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, openly sanctions offensive Jihad: “In the Jihad which
you are seeking, you look for the enemy and invade him. This
type of Jihad takes place only when the Islamic state is
invading other [countries] in order to spread the word of Islam
and to remove obstacles standing in its way.” Elsewhere, he
notes: “Islam has the right to take the initiative…this is God’s
religion and it is for the whole world. It has the right to destroy
all obstacles in the form of institutions and traditions … it
attacks institutions and traditions to release human beings
from their poisonous influences, which distort human nature
and curtail human freedom. Those who say that Islamic Jihad
was merely for the defense of the ‘homeland of Islam’ diminish
the greatness of the Islamic way of life.”
The widely respected Dictionary of Islam defines Jihad as “Areligious war with those who are unbelievers in the mission of
Muhammad. It is an incumbent religious duty, established in
the Qur’an and in the Traditions as a divine institution, and
enjoined specially for the purpose of advancing Islam and of
repelling evil from Muslims…[Quoting from the Hanafi school,
Hedaya, 2:140, 141.], “The destruction of the sword is incurred
by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as
appears from various passages in the traditions which are
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 43/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
appears from various passages in the traditions which are
generally received to this effect.”
Muhammad’s failure to leave a clear line of succession
resulted in perpetual internal war following his death. Those
who knew him best first fought to keep remote tribes fromleaving Islam and reverting to their preferred religion (the Ridda
or ‘Apostasy wars’). Then, within the closer community, early
Meccan converts battled later ones. Hostility developed
between those immigrants who had traveled with Muhammad
to Mecca and the Ansar at Medina who had helped them settle
in. Finally there was a violent struggle within Muhammad’s own
family between his favorite wife and favorite daughter – a jagged
schism that has left Shias and Sunnis at each others’ throats
to this day.
The strangest and most untrue thing that can be said about
Islam is that it is a Religion of Peace. If every standard by
which the West is judged and condemned (slavery,
imperialism, intolerance, misogyny, sexual repression,
warfare…) were applied equally to Islam, the verdict would bedevastating. Islam never gives up what it conquers, be it
religion, culture, language or life. Neither does it make
apologies or any real effort at moral progress. It is the least
open to dialogue and the most self-absorbed. It is convinced of
its own perfection, yet brutally shuns self-examination and
represses criticism.
This is what makes the Quran’s verses of violence so
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 44/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
This is what makes the Quran s verses of violence so
dangerous. They are given the weight of divine command.
While Muslim terrorists take them as literally as anything else
in their holy book, and understand that Islam is incomplete
without Jihad, moderates offer little to contradict them –
outside of opinion. Indeed, what do they have? Speaking of peace and love may win over the ignorant, but when every
twelfth verse of Islam’s holiest book either speaks to Allah’s
hatred for non-Muslims or calls for their death, forced
conversion, or subjugation, it ’s little wonder that sympathy for
terrorism runs as deeply as it does in the broader community –
even if most Muslims personally prefer not to interpret their
religion in this way.
Although scholars like Ibn Khaldun, one of Islam’s most
respected philosophers, understood that “the holy war is a
religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim
mission and (the obligation to) convert everybody to Islam
either by persuasion or by force”, many other Muslims are
either unaware or willfully ignorant of the Quran’s near absence
of verses that preach universal non-violence. Their understanding of Islam comes from what they are taught by
others. In the West, it is typical for believers to think that their
religion must be like Christianity – preaching the New
Testament virtues of peace, love, and tolerance – because
Muslims are taught that Islam is supposed to be superior in
every way. They are somewhat surprised and embarrassed to
learn that the evidence of the Quran and the bloody history of
Islam are very much in contradiction to this
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 45/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Islam are very much in contradiction to this.
Others simply accept the violence. In 1991, a Palestinian
couple in America was convicted of stabbing their daughter to
death for being too Westernized. A family friend came to their
defense, excoriating the jury for not understanding the“culture”, claiming that the father was merely following “the
religion” and saying that the couple had to “discipline their
daughter or lose respect.” (source). In 2011, unrepentant
Palestinian terrorists, responsible for the brutal murders of
civilians, women and children explicitly in the name of Allah
were treated to a luxurious “holy pilgrimage” to Mecca by the
Saudi king – without a single Muslim voice raised in protest.
For their part, Western liberals would do well not to sacrifice
critical thinking to the god of political correctness, or look for
reasons to bring other religion down to the level of Islam merely
to avoid the existential truth that this it is both different and
dangerous.
There are just too many Muslims who take the Quranliterally… and too many others who couldn’t care less about
the violence done in the name of Islam.
The Myth:
Muhammad Lived at Peace with the Jews
Part 1: The Banu Qaynuqa
The Truth:
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 46/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
The early part of the Qur’an was written while Muhammad lived
in Mecca, a town with very few Jews and no Jewish tribes. At
the time, he presented himself to the Meccans as a Jewish
prophet based on the stories that he learned from the Jewsthat he met on his travels – and from his cousin Waraqa, a
convert from Judaism (the Qur’an addresses this accusation,
but only to the extent of denying it).
When Muhammad relocated to Medina, there were three
Jewish tribes living there already whose good graces he
needed to stay in initially, since he and his small band of
Muslim immigrants were in a position of relative weakness. He
tried to convince the Jews that he was the last in the
succession of their own prophets and even changed the Qibla
(direction of prayer) toward Jerusalem, the center of the Jewish
world.
The Jews at Medina were not impressed with Muhammad’s
esoteric claims, particularly since there were obviousdiscrepancies between their Torah and his version of the same
stories. In the Qur’an, history from the Bible is presented
immaturely and sounds more like a series of fairy tales with
the same redundant moral – believe in Muhammad’s claims
about himself or face earthly destruction and eternal torment.
When asked why he didn’t provide proof of his prophethood by
performing some sort of miracle as the prophets of the past
had done Muhammad came up with a clever excuse by saying
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 47/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
had done, Muhammad came up with a clever excuse by saying
that there was no point in doing so since the Jews had rejected
those past prophets anyway (Quran3:183-184). Thus,
Muhammad had nothing to offer but his own testimony.
The prophet of Islam did not handle the Jewish rejection well,particularly since his people had been relying heavily on his
many claims of being a prophet in the same mode as Moses,
Abraham and Jesus. Muhammad “resolved” his dilemma by
claiming that the Jews of Medina were heretics and he
arbitrarily dismissed their “version” of the Torah by claiming
that they had corrupted it and “hidden” the verses that
supported his claims of being a prophet. (Interestingly, despitethe many Jews who converted to Islam, either out of
compulsion or free will, no one ever produced the “uncorrupted
Torah” that was supposed to have existed).
Following Muhammad’s victory against the Meccans at Badr,
his wealth and power had increased to the point of being able
to take care of his “Jew problem.” The words of the Qur’an
become noticeably harsher toward the “People of the Book” in
the Medina portion of the text, and his actions become
confrontational.
Although much is made of the “Constitution” of Medina, the
treaty that Muhammad created for all of the local tribes on his
arrival, contemporary Muslims are often reluctant to admit the
injunction that cancelled out this treaty less than two years
later:
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 48/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
“While we were in the Mosque, the Prophet came out and said,
“Let us go to the Jews” We went out till we reached Bait-ul-
Midras. He said to them, “If you embrace Islam, you will be
safe. You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His
Apostle, and I want to expel you from this land. So, if anyoneamongst you owns some property, he is permitted to sell it,
otherwise you should know that the Earth belongs to Allah and
His Apostle.” (Bukhari 53:392)
Having announced his intentions, Muhammad looked for an
excuse to take land from those Jews who refused to convert to
Islam. His first target was a tribe that had recently been
aligned in a conflict against the other two. Muhammad
guessed correctly that the other Jewish tribes would not come
to the assistance of the Banu Qaynuqa if he laid siege to
them.
Muhammad’s excuse is said to be an incident in which a
Muslim was killed by an angry Jewish mob. That the mob was
angry because the Muslim in question had just murdered aJewish merchant over a woman’s honor is sometimes
conveniently forgotten by contemporary apologists, who
nonetheless admit that Muhammad chose to lay siege to the
Qaynuqa stronghold rather than mediate a peaceful resolution
to the crisis.
This point is important. According to Muslim historians, the
first blood shed was when a Jew was murdered by a Muslim for
playing a prank on a Muslim woman (by lifting her dress) The
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 49/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
playing a prank on a Muslim woman (by lifting her dress). The
Muslim was killed in retaliation by those who had just
witnessed the murder.
On what basis is physical violence – much less murder –
justified by a prank of this sort? Moreover, if Muhammad
believed in the Old Testament law of “an eye for an eye,” then
why did he not recognize the legitimacy of the second killing
against the disparity of the first?
In any event, the self-proclaimed prophet of God responded
with self-serving force against a people that had welcomed him
to their community less than two years earlier. Unprepared for
battle, the Qaynuqa surrendered to their former guest without afight.
Muhammad wished to slay the entire tribe outright, but was
talked out of it by a mutual Arab friend, who was horrified by
his intentions:
Abdullah b. Ubayy b. Salul went to him when God had put
them in his power and said, “O Muhammad, deal kindly with
my clients” (now they were allies of Khazraj), but the apostle
put him off. He repeated the words, and the apostle turned
away from him, whereupon he thrust his hand into the collar of
the apostle’s robe; the apostle was so angry that his face
became almost black. He said, “Confound you, let me go.” He
answered, “No, by God, I will not let you go until you deal
kindly with my clients. Four hundred men without mail and
three hundred mailed protected me from all mine enemies;
would you cut them down in one morning? By God, I am a man
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 50/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
who fears that circumstances may change”’ The apostle said,
“You can have them.” (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 546)
Muhammad was thus talked into allowing the Jews of Qaynuqa
to escape only with a few tools and the clothes on their back.He confiscated their wealth and land, taking a fifth for himself
and giving the rest to the other Muslims. (According to the
Qur’an, this was their punishment for not believing in
Muhammad 3:10-12).
The man who had saved the lives of the Jews was later called a
hypocrite by Muhammad, and it is evident that he deeply
regretted his decision not to slay the Qaynuqa. One of the nine
Qur’anic verses that prohibit Muslims from taking Jews and
Christians as friends was “revealed” at this time.
Thus was Muhammad able to fulfill his own promise that “those
who resist Allah and his Messenger will be humiliated” (Quran
58:20), further solidifying his credibility with the Muslims – and
inspiring fourteen centuries of relentless Jihad in the name of following his example.
Muhammad Lived at Peace with the Jews
Part 2: The Banu Nadir
The Truth:
Muhammad evicted the second Jewish tribe, the Banu Nadir,
less than a year after evicting the first. The circumstances
under which this occurred are a strong testimony to the
double-standards by which the Muslims treated others
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 51/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
(explicitly laid out in the Quran: 48:29).
In 625, one of Muhammad’s soldiers murdered two men in their
sleep who were from a tribe that had “an agreement of
friendship” with him (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 650). It was decidedthat blood-money would be offered to satisfy this debt
(although Muhammad held non-Muslims to the highest
standards, he never put his own men to death for killing non-
Muslims). However, rather than take care of this debt himself
from the substantial wealth that he acquired from raiding
Meccan caravans and confiscating Jewish property,
Muhammad went to a Jewish tribe, the Banu Nadir, to request
their contribution, even though the tribe had nothing to do with
the murder (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 652).
Once he showed up with his men, Muhammad made his
demands and then waited outside the wall of their house for the
money. Later, he claimed that Allah spoke to him during this
time and told him that the Jews were going to assassinate him
by dropping a rock from the roof of the house onto his head:
As the apostle was with a number of this companions… news
came to him from heaven about what these people intended
(Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 652)
Muhammad left, then returned with an army and laid siege to
the entire community, forcing them to surrender without a fight.
As with the Qaynuqa (the Jewish tribe before them), the people
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 52/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
were evicted with the clothes on their back and what they
could pack on their camels. Another revelation from Allah
(relayed through Muhammad, of course) allowed the prophet of
Islam to personally confiscate all of the remaining property for
himself (Bukhari 52:153).
For the skeptic, there are a couple of problems with
Muhammad’s justification for evicting an entire tribe of people
even within the boundaries of the account. In the first place, it
is certainly suspicious that he demanded that another tribe pay
for what his own men had done – and that he went personally
to collect the money. Given what Allah supposedly knew, one
wonders why Allah didn’t just save His “messenger” the trip.
As for Muhammad’s assertion that his god spoke in his ear,
thus enabling him to confiscate the wealth of an entire
community for his personal gain… well, let’s just say that it is
curious at best. Revelations of convenience were quite
common in Muhammad’s life, providing him with wealth from
Muslims and non-Muslims alike, along with eleven wives and
unlimited sex with female slaves. He operated with theimpunity of a cult leader.
But the largest problem is that Muhammad justified his attack
on the Banu Nadir by saying that they had planned to
assassinate him. By this standard, the Jews would have been
acting entirely within their rights, given that the prophet of Islam
had carried out several assassinations against their own
community by that time!
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 53/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
A Banu Nadir Jew named Ka’b al-Ashraf was actually
murdered on Muhammad’s order just a few months before the
entire tribe was attacked. The excuse was that he had
lamented the killing of the Meccans at the Battle of Badr andresponded by composing crude poems about the Muslim
women:
Then he composed amatory verses of an insulting nature about
the Muslim women. The apostle said…”Who will rid me of al-
Ashraf?” [Another Muslim} said, “I will deal with him for you O
apostle of Allah. I will kill him.” He said, “Do so if you can.” (Ibn
Ishaq/Hisham 550)
Muhammad gave the man permission to take any measures
necessary to murder the poet, including lying. The assassin
gathered a group of Muslims and tricked al-Ashraf to come out
of his house, alone and unarmed, by pretending to be
interested in obtaining a loan.
The murder took place in the dark and was a messy affair. al- Ashraf began screaming as he was being stabbed:
Meanwhile the enemy of Allah had made such a noise that
every fort around us was showing a light. I thrust [the dagger]
into the lower part of his body, then I bore down upon it until I
reached his genitals, and the enemy of Allah fell to the ground.
(Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 552)
These two events demonstrate that the Muslims of Medina
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 54/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
These two events demonstrate that the Muslims of Medina
operated under a different standard than what they held to
those around them. Muslims were allowed to kill others when
they felt insulted or in danger, but others were not allowed to
even plot in defense of their own lives.
Muhammad was in a position to deny others the same
sympathy and tolerance that he demanded for himself because
of the control that he had established within his first two years
of arriving in Medina. He used his newfound power to order
assassinations and evictions, thus putting dissenters in fear.
Keep in mind that when Muhammad was in Mecca, he told the
elders there that he would bring them “slaughter” (Tabari Vol 6,
102) and they subsequently evicted him. Yet, instead of
recognizing the logic behind this, Muhammad complained
incessantly about his ignominious ouster and eventually
returned with a conquering army. He also behaved with
extreme hypocrisy toward those who spoke out against him,
regardless of what sort of threat they actually posed.
For today’s Muslims, who prefer to believe that Muhammad
was an unselfish man of perfect character, the fate of the Banu
Nadir is but a minor inconvenience. It does not bother them
that an entire tribe of Jews was evicted on the basis of a
hypothetical assassination plot following the very realassassination of one of their leaders. Jews are not Muslims.
Hence they are not entitled to be treated with the same
respect
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 55/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
respect.
Islam is the ultimate supremacist ideology.
The Myth:
Muhammad Lived at Peace with the Jews
Part 3: The Banu Qurayza
The Truth:
Verses 5:45-48 of the Qur’an affirm the Old Testament rule of
“an eye for an eye,” but also add the Christian principle that
forgiveness is more noble than retaliation. If ever there was
proof that these words do not necessarily apply to the
treatment of non-Muslims, however, it is in Muhammad’s
conduct toward the Jews in general and the Qurayza tribe in
particular.
Muhammad and his band of immigrants arrived in Medina in
622 completely dependent on the hospitality of the three
Jewish tribes that lived there alongside the Arabs. In less than
two years, two of the tribes that had welcomed him, the BanuQaynuqa and the Banu Nadir would be evicted, losing their
land and their wealth to the Muslims as soon as their guests
gained the power to conquer and confiscate. Muhammad
accomplished this by deftly exploiting his opponents divisions.
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 56/112
story of the massacre has become controversial. SomeMuslims deny the episode, largely on the basis of mere
inconvenience. Others are unaware of it altogether. But, not
only is the incident well documented in the Hadith and Sira
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 57/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
only is the incident well documented in the Hadith and Sira
(biography of Muhammad), there is even a brief reference to it
in the Qur’an (verse 33:26).
Since Islam makes no apologies, particularly for anything that
Muhammad personally did, contemporary Muslims generally
try to convince themselves that the victims of Qurayza
deserved their fate. They must have turned on the Muslims in
battle and inflicted many deaths, forcing Muhammad to y ield to
the wishes of his people and respond in kind.
Unfortunately, the accounts of what happened, as related to
the early Muslim historians by eyewitnesses, do not support
this myth. In fact, it was the Qurayza who were caught in an
impossible situation at the time between the Muslims and their
Meccan adversaries.
Shortly after arriving in Medina in 622, Muhammad began
raiding the merchant caravans traveling to and from neighboring
Mecca. He would steal their property and kill anyone who
defended it (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 424-425). The Jews of Qurayza
had nothing to do with this. Much like the Meccans, the Jewswere also traders and they appreciated the value of security in
doing business. They neither encouraged Muhammad’s raids
nor shared in his ill-gotten gain.
After a few years of this, the Meccans eventually realized that
they would have to try and capture Medina, since it was beingused as a base of operations by Muhammad and his pirates. In
627, they sent an army to the outskirts of the city and
appeared poised to take it in what has been called the Battle of
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 58/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
appeared poised to take it in what has been called the Battle of
the Trench (the Muslims dug a trench around the exposed
northern and western parts of the city to stop the Meccan
military advance).
The Qurayza, who lived to the east of Medina, were thuscaught in a bad situation. Not responsible for Muhammad’s
war, they were nonetheless drawn into it, particularly when
they were approached by a Meccan leader and asked not to
assist Muhammad in his defense against the siege (to that
point, the Qurayza had contributed digging tools to the
Muslims, but not fighters).
The chief of the Qurayza did not wish to even entertain the
Meccan envoy, but he was tricked into allowing him into his
home (Ishaq/Hisham 674). Once there, the Meccan began
making his case that the battle was going against Muhammad
and that his fall was imminent. The anguish of the Qurayza
chief over the trying circumstances of the position that he felt
forced into is noted even by Muslim historians:
When Ka’b heard of Huyayy’s coming he shut the door of his
fort in his face, and when he asked permission to enter he
refused to see him, saying that he was a man of ill omen…
Then Huyayy accused him of [being inhospitable]… This so
enraged Ka’b that he threw open his door. [Huyayy] said to
him, “Good heavens, Ka’b, I have brought you immortal fameand a great army… They have made a firm agreement and
promised me that they will not depart until we have made an
end of Muhammad and his men. “Ka’b said, “By God, you have
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 59/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
end of Muhammad and his men. Ka b said, By God, you have
brought me immortal shame and an empty cloud while it
thunders and lightenings with nothing in it. Woe to you
Huyayy, leave me as I am.” (Ishaq/Hisham 674)
After much “wheedling” by the Meccans, however, the Qurayza
leader finally gave in and agreed to remain neutral in the
conflict. He would neither contribute troops to the city ’s
defense nor to its impending capture at the hands of an army
with superior numbers. The Muslims would be left on their own
to deal with the conflict they had started with the Meccans.
The first twenty days of the conflict passed “without fighting”
(Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 676) other than a few exchanges of arrows
across the trench. A half-hearted effort on that day to breach
the defenses proved fatal to the Meccan, thus convincing their
leader that they could not win unless the Qurayza joined the
battle from the other side. However, the Qurayza refused,
ironically enough, thus prompting the Meccans to immediately
abandon the siege. A grand total of just six Muslims had been killed at the Battle
of the Trench. Each of their names were carefully recorded (Ibn
Ishaq/Hisham 699) – none were killed by the Qurayza or by
anything done by the Qurayza.
With the battle over, however, Muhammad surprised his armyby turning them against the Qurayza fortress, claiming that the
neutrality of the leader was a breach of the original constitution
of Medina which the prophet of Islam had personally drawn up
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 60/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
p p p y p
for the tribes five years earlier. The original language of this
‘treaty’ is not known, however, and later guesses as to what it
might have said seem suspiciously tailored.
It is unlikely, for example, that the tribes of Medina would have
given Muslims the right to slaughter them for merely speaking
out against him, yet several prominent Jewish leaders and
poets had been assassinated on Muhammad’s order prior to
the Qurayza affair. At least one innocent merchant was slain
by his Muslim business partner following Muhammad’s order in
624 for his men to “kill any Jew who falls into your power” (al-
Tabari 7:97). Muhammad had also attacked the two other
Jewish tribes – parties to the same agreement – looting their
property and then evicting them from their land.
There is little doubt that the troubles Muhammad brought on
Medina, through his mistreatment of the Jews and his
relentless pursuit of hostilities against the Meccans, were a
part of the sales pitch made by the Meccans to the Qurayzaleader to win his neutrality – along with the implicit threat of
slaughter if the city were taken by the Meccans. From Kab’s
perspective, it would only be a matter of time before
Muhammad found an excuse to attack and plunder his tribe as
well.
Contrary to popular misconceptions, however, the Qurayza had
not attacked the Muslims. In fact, had they attacked, then it
surely would have been the end of Muhammad and his band of
pirates since the southern end of the city was completely
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 61/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
pirates since the southern end of the city was completely
exposed to the Qurayza. In a terrible irony, it was the decision
not to engage in violence that later sealed the fate of the Jews,
who were only the first in a very long line of victims to horribly
overestimate the value that Islam places on the lives of unbelievers.
According to Muhammad, it was the angel Gabriel (seen only
by himself, of course) who ordered the siege on the Qurayza.
After twenty-five days of blockade, the Jews gave in and
surrendered to the prophet of Islam. As Ibn Ishaq/Hisham puts
it, they “submitted themselves to the Apostle’s judgment”
(Ishaq/Hisham 688).
Another misconception is that Muhammad did not render the
death sentence against the Qurayza and was therefore not
responsible for it. There is a partial truth in this, in that
Muhammad clearly attempted to offload responsibility on
another party. However, from the narrative, it is obvious that
Muhammad clearly approved of the subsequent massacre – afact further verified both by his choice of “arbitrator” and his
subsequent reaction.
First, the prophet of Islam tricked the Qurayza by getting them
to agree to put their fate in the hands of “one of their own.” In
fact, this was a Jewish convert to Islam, a Muslim who had
fought in the Battle of the Trench. Unbeknownst to theQurayza, Sa’d bin Muadh had also been one of the few
Muslims fatally injured in the battle (Ishaq/Hisham 689), which
one can reasonably assume to have influenced his judgment.
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 62/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
According to the Hadith, he was quite eager to continue
slaying “unbelievers” even as he lay dying in his tent (Bukhari
59:448).
Secondly, when Sa’d did render his decree that the men of
Qurayza should be killed and their women and children
pressed into slavery, Muhammad did not express the slightest
bit of disapproval. In fact, the prophet of Islam confirmed this
barbaric sentence to be Allah’s judgment as well (Bukhari
58:148).
Consider the contrast between the historical Muhammad and
the man of “peace and forgiveness” that today’s Muslims often
assure us that he was. In light of the fact that the Qurayza had
not killed anyone, wouldn’t a true man of peace have simply
sought dialogue with them to try and determine their grievance,
find common ground and then resolve the matter with dignity to
both parties?
Instead, the prophet of Islam had the men bound with rope. Hedug trenches and then began beheading the captives in
batches. In a scene that must have resembled footage of
Hitler’s death squads, small groups of helpless Jews, who had
done no harm to anyone, were brought out and forced to kneel,
staring down at the bodies of others before their own heads
were lopped off and their bodies were pushed down into theditch.
There is some evidence that Muhammad personally engaged in
the slaughter. Not only does the earliest narrative bluntly say
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 63/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
that the apostle “sent for them” and “made an end of them,”but
there is also support for this in the Qur’an. Verse 33:26 says of
the Qurayza, “some you slew, some you took captive.” The
Arabic “you: is in the plural, but the Qur’an is supposed to be
Allah’s conversation with Muhammad, so it makes no sense
that he would not be included.
In any event, there is no denying that Muhammad found
pleasure in the slaughter, particularly after acquiring a pretty
young Jewish girl (freshly “widowed” and thus available to him
for sexual servitude) (Ishaq/Hisham 693).
Other women were not quite as compliant. The historians
record the reaction of one woman who literally lost her mind as
her family was being killed. The executioners apparently found
her maniacal laughter annoying and beheaded her as well. As
Aisha later recounted:
“I will not forget that she was laughing extremely although she
knew that she would be killed” (Abu Dawud 2665)
(One can forgive Aisha’s obtuseness. At the time that she and
her husband sat observing the carnage together, the wife of
Muhammad was only 12-years-old).
Boys as young as 13 or 14 were executed as well, providedthat they had reached puberty. The Muslims ordered the boys
to drop their clothes. Those with pubic hair then had their
throats cut (Abu Dawud 4390). There was no point in trying to
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 64/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
determine whether or not they were actual combatants
because there were none. There had been no combat!
Muhammad parceled out the widows and surviving children as
slaves to his men for sexual servitude and labor. The wealth
accumulated by the Qurayza was also divided. Since the tribe
had been a peaceful farming and trading community, there
were not enough weapons and horses taken to suit
Muhammad’s tastes, so he obtained more of these by trading
off some of the Qurayza women in a distant slave market
(Ishaq 693).
In addition to the main question as to why people who had not
killed anyone were put to death and enslaved, there are several
others raised by Muhammad’s massacre of the Qurayza. For
example, the Quran says that no bearer of burdens can bear
the burden of another” (Quran53:38) yet every member of the
tribe was punished for a decision pressed on one reluctant
member.
And what of the places in the Qur’an where violent passages
are sometimes mitigated by the occasional admonishment tocease killing those who stop fighting? The surrendered
Qurayza had never even fought in the first place.
While Muslim apologists grapple with the challenges posed by
this episode, the fate of the Qurayza is only the first of many
such massacres that the Religion of Peace has provided the
world. Whether it be the 4,000 Jews at Granada in 1066, the100,000 Hindus on a single day in 1399, or the million or so
Christian Armenians in the early 1900′s, untold tens of millions
of innocents have perished in mass executions at the hands of
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 65/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Islam’s dedicated disciples…
Yet, there has never been, nor will there ever be in the future,
an apology from those who follow Muhammad, since the
massacre of infidels was the example personally set by their
prophet at Qurayza.
The Myth:
Muhammad Never Killed Captives
The Truth:
Islamic terrorists take and execute hostages on an almostdaily basis. So much so, that mainstream Muslims rarely even
bother to comment. When they do, however, we are assured
that this has “nothing to do with Islam” because Muhammad
never executed prisoners of war, or anyone else taken
hostage…
Except that he did.
During the Battle of Badr, several defenseless Meccans were
slaughtered by Muhammad’s companions. These included a
man named Umayya and his young son, who were taken
prisoner by a Muslim (a former friend who tried to protect
them), but were then set upon by a mob before they could be
escorted to safety:
“I said (would you attack) my prisoners? But… The people
formed a ring around us as I was protecting him. Then a man
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 66/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
drew his sword and cut off his son’s foot so that he fell down
and Umayya [the boy’s father] let out a cry such as I have
never heard… They hewed them to pieces with their swords
until they were dead.” (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 449) Another heartwarming account of Muslim chivalry during the
same battle concerns Abu Jahl, one of Muhammad’s arch-
enemies at Mecca. He met his death as he lay defenseless. In
this case, two Muslims took the opportunity to administer the
death blow:
Mu’awwidh passed Abu Jahl as he lay there helpless and
smote him until he left him at his last gasp. (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham
451)
Another Muslim named Abdullah then came by and put his foot
on Abu Jahl’s neck and taunted him before decapitating him:
Then I cut off his head and brought it to the apostle saying,
“This is the head of the enemy of Allah, Abu Jahl.”… I threw his
head before the apostle and he gave thanks to Allah. (IbnIshaq/Hisham 451).
Apparently these companions of Muhammad were unaware of
the “Muslim rule” against killing captives. But who could really
blame them? Not only did the prophet of Islam praise them for
the slaughter, he also ordered the killing of another captivebrought before him.
Uqba bin Abu Mu’ayt pled for his life:
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 67/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
“When the apostle ordered him to be killed, Uqba said, “But
who will look after my children, O Muhammad?” [Muhammad’s
reply] “Hell.” The man was put to death. (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham
458)
Other captives were ransomed, but Uqba received special
treatment because he had mocked Muhammad at Mecca. His
crime was that he had thrown the entrails of a dead animal on
Muhammad’s back as he was praying, to the amusement of
other Meccans (Muslim 4422, Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 277). The
prophet of Islam determined that this fraternity prank was worth
killing over, and it became the first of several other occasionsin which people were slain on Muhammad’s order merely for
mocking him.
Interestingly, there appears to be evidence that Muhammad
regretted not killing all of his captives, instead of ransoming
some. Verse 8:67 of the Qur’an was “revealed” in the aftermath
of Badr and says “It is not for any prophet to have captives until
he hath made slaughter in the land.”
The prophet of Islam went on to execute many other captives,
most notoriously the 800 men and boys taken prisoner at
Qurayza. His men also brutally murdered an elderly woman
named Umm Qirfa after taking her prisoner following a raid onthe tribe of Banu Fazara. According to al-Tabari she was killed
by, “putting a rope to her two legs and to two camels and
driving them until thy rent her in two.” (The woman’s daughter
was then doled out to one of her Muslim killers)
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 68/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
was then doled out to one of her Muslim killers).
While it is common to hear Muslims claim that their religion is
“against” killing hostages, the actual history of Islam proves
that nothing could be further from the truth
The Myth:
Muhammad only Waged War in Self-Defense
The Truth:
The myth that warfare is only justified in Islam under the co
1 0 Rate This
Reply
plum December 8, 2012 at 1:58 pm
Hi crazy dude,
You see Muslims believe in every Word of the Quran.
As I’ve explained elsewhere already that Quran as
was being revealed Islam was coming up and more
and more people were joining Imagine yourself being
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 69/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
and more people were joining. Imagine yourself being
in the midst of pagans as my great grand parents did
in Hindustan in early 1800 and his brothers kicked
them out of their homes and had to settle in East
Africa. But things got worse for them Hindus too and
so they were welcome by their bros in East Africa
and that is how we love each other and co-exist
peacefully!
We don’t fight and don’t advocate violence at all.
Yet, if you pretend to be thick and ignore theknowledge of process revelation of the Quran, then
you have every right of remaining afraid of Muslims as
the verses tell you!
So, if you (empty head) see a Muslim then flee lest
he slaughters you, okay?
If you insult their most revered figure then you must
expect some punishment from them. I cannot go
scott free if I were to abuse your dad, right?
Mohammed is more important than their own lives!
You follow your religion or join Islam and be good, do
good, okay?
Regards
plum
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 70/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
plum
0 0 Rate This
Humanity Triumphs December 10, 2012 at 9:39 am
No. go and read Tafsirs (context) of Quranic verses. You will
find that Islam orders to kill innocent NOT injustice.
Wars happen all the time BUT champions raise hand of
friendship towards others and try to resolve conflict. You very
beautifully linked INDOCHINA war here but do you know what
happens today. INDIA raised a hand towards CHINA and today
both trade worth a million $.
Anyways, INDOCHINA war is totally different due toa -> It was not for religious region
b -> It wasn’t a civil war
c -> Both the countries now want to stop the war.
Therefore, do not put this war to the list.
Regarding resources, Each civil war is listed here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_civil_wars
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 71/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Just see post WW 2.section there
I would also say 1 thing. Your Reply to Bob was ridiculous.
You said that your grandfather lived in early 1800. That time,Hindustan was under British custody and they were trying their
best to educate Hindus what exactly is the true face of
muslims. That was so called Divide and Rule policy. So, Hindu
– Muslim war is initiated by British. So, blame them not
Hindustan. Grow up!
You just threatened BOB that you (OR someone e lse) will
kill him if he insults your prophet. You insulted Jesus.
Now, you tell me that Bob (OR any other Christian for that
matter who read your comments) kill you ?????
As your prophet is important to you, So is Jesus to Christians.
Even then no Christian killed you when you insulted Jesus.
This is obvious proof that:
CHRISTIANITY TEACHES PEACE AND TOLERANCE WHILE
ISLAM TEACHES TERRORISM ALONE
0 0 Rate This
Reply
Bob November 26, 2012 at 10:52 pm
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 72/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
MUSLIMS FOR PROGRESSIVE VALUES
WHAT WE DO
MPV establishes and nurtures vibrant progressive Muslim communities. We do this by
creating opportunities for religious discourse, volunteer and community activities, and
cultural events bringing together the arts, spirituality and social activism.
MPV is a progressive Muslim voice on contemporary issues. We voice our perspectives by
participating in civil discourse, engaging with the media and government entities, and by
partnering with both Muslim and non-Muslim progressive organizations.
MPV promotes theologically-sound frameworks for Islamic liberalism. We seek to
reinvigorate the Islamic tradition of ijtihad (critical engagement and interpretation of sacred
texts) and intellectual discourse. We do this by collaborating with religious scholars and
developing position papers on theological issues that are accessible to a wide audience.
BUILDING A PROGRESSIVE MUSLIM COMMUNITY
Too often Muslims in America are asked ‘where are the progressives amongst us? Aren’t
there any Muslims who are for women’s reproductive rights, for LGBTQ rights, for the
separation of Religion and State?’
Muslims for Progressive Values has been in existence s ince 2007. Quietly and diligently wehave been building our progressive community, one city at a time, and now one country at a
time. In the short time since its inception in Los Angeles, we have expanded to include
chapters in Washington DC, Atlanta, Salt Lake City, Columbus (OH), as well as Ottawa and
Toronto, Canada.
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 73/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
,
We assert that Islam is inherently progressive, inclusive and egalitarian; an understanding
from which our community is built on and that informs the ten principles of MPV.
Mission:
Muslims for Progressive Values (MPV) is an inclusive community rooted in the traditional
Qur’anic ideals of human dignity and social justice. We welcome all who are interested in
discussing, promoting and working for the implementation of progressive values — human
rights, freedom of expression, and separation of church and state — as well as inclusive and
tolerant understandings of Islam.
Muslims for Progressive Values is guided by the following ten principles. Each branch of the
tree in our logo represents MPV’s ten principles rooted in Islam.
Identity:
We accept as Muslim anyone who identifies as such. The veracity and integrity of that claim
is between the individual and God, and is not a matter for the state nor an issue which other
individuals can or should judge.
Equality:
We affirm the equal worth of all human beings, regardless of race, sex, gender, ethnicity,
nationality, creed, sexual orientation, or ability. We are committed to work toward societiesthat ensure social, political, educational, and economic opportunities for all.
Separation of Religious and State Authorities:
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 74/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
We believe that freedom of conscience is not only essential to all human societies but
integral to the Qur’anic view of humanity. We believe that secular government is the only
way to achieve the Islamic ideal of freedom from compulsion in matters of faith.
Freedom of Speech:
We support freedom of expression and freedom of dissent, whether political, artistic, social
or religious, even when that expression may be offensive and that dissent may be
considered blasphemous. No one should be legally prosecuted, imprisoned or detained for
declaring or promoting unpopular opinions.
Universal Human Rights:
We affirm our commitment to social, economic and environmental justice. We believe that
the full self-realization of all people, in a safe and sustainable world, is a prerequisite for
freedom, civility, and peace. We support efforts for universal health care, universal public
education, the protection of our environment, and the eradication of poverty.
Women’s Rights:
We support women’s agency and self-determination in every aspect of their lives. We
believe in women’s full participation in society at every level. We affirm our commitment to
reproductive justice and empowering women to make healthy decisions regarding their
bodies, sexuality and reproduction.
LGBTQ Rights:
We endorse the human and civil rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, and
queer (LGBTIQ) individuals. We support full equality and inclusion of all individuals,
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 75/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
queer (LGBTIQ) individuals. We support full equality and inclusion of all individuals,
regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity, in society and in the Muslim community.
We affirm our commitment to ending discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender
identity.
Critical Analysis and Interpretation:
We call for critical engagement with Islamic scripture, traditional jurisprudence, and current
Muslim discourses. We believe that critical thinking is essential to spiritual development.
We promote interpretations that reflect basic Qur’anic principles of tolerance, inclusiveness,
mercy, compassion, and fairness.
Compassion:
We affirm that justice and compassion should be the guiding principles for all aspects of
human conduct. We repudiate militarism and violence, whether on an individual,
organizational, or national level.
Diversity:
We embrace religious pluralism and the diversity of inspirations that motivate people to
embrace social just ice. We believe that one’s religion is not the exclusive source of truth.
As such, we will engage with a diversity of philosophical and spiritual traditions in pursuit of
a more just, peaceful and sustainable world.
We appreciate the interest in our principles and we encourage you to share it. However we
do request that you do let us know of your intent. (c) 2012 No reproduction of these
principles is allowed without MPV’s written permission. Thank you.
Advisory Council
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 76/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Advisory Council
Muslims for Progressive Values is guided by the following ten principles. Each branch of the
tree in our logo represents MPV’s ten principles rooted in islam.
Our Advisory Council provides advice and assistance to the staff and board of directors of
MPV, and consists of several prominent scholars, writers, and activists.
The Board of Directors of Muslims for Progressive Values is made up of motivated and
experienced progressive Muslims living and working in the United States.
Muslims for Progressive Values is part of a broader international movement of Muslims and
people of all faith around the world and in the United States who share similar values and
goals.
Our Principles Advisory CouncilBoard of Directors Partners & Friends
Our Advisory Council provides advice and assistance to the staff and board of directors of
MPV, and consists of several prominent scholars, writers, and activists.
Zainah Anwar
Zainah Anwar is a prominent Malaysian non-governmental organisation leader and activist.
She was the head of Sisters in Islam (SIS) for two decades. Ms. Anwar currently serves asproject director for the SIS-initiated global movement for justice and equality in the Muslim
family (MUSAWAH) and is on the board of directors for SIS. Ms. Anwar received a
postgraduate degree from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, and
is a former member of Malaysia’s Human Rights Commission. She has been profiled in the
International Herald Tribune and on the PBS news show, Frontline.
Ms. Anwar’s book, Islamic Revivalism in Malaysia: Dakwah among the Students (Pelanduk,1987), continues to be cited for its insights into modern-day Islam in Malaysia, and she is a
frequent contributor to the editorial pages of Malaysia’s main newspaper, the New Straits
Times. Her recent editorials cover such topics as freedom of the press, the
underachievement of boys in Malaysian schools, compassion and pluralism in Islam,
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 77/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
freedom of religion in the Arab world, and Malaysia’s gender gap in politics and the
economy.
Sisters in Islam (SIS) is a Malaysian non-governmental organization founded in 1988 that is
committed to upholding the principles of justice and human rights for women within the
framework of Islam. Their program highlights provision of legal services, public education,
outreach and advocacy to promote legal reform and protect the rights of women. SIS has
published a number of publications concerning women, Islam and the law, including the
following titles: Are Muslim Men Allowed to Beat Their Wives?, Islam and Family Planning,
and Hadith on Women in Marriage. They have also conducted research on the impact of
polygamy on the family, have developed draft legislation on Islamic Family Law, andmaintain an active media presence in Malaysia to combat movements by government
officials and religious authorities to restrict the rights of women at home and in society.
Saleemah Abdul-Ghafur is part of a national movement to end gender discrimination in the
American Muslim community by participating in a civil action to give women space and
voice in American mosques where they have traditionally been banned. In addition to
working to establish women as prayer leaders and co-organizing a historic woman-led
prayer in New York City, Abdul-Ghafur edited LIVING ISLAM OUT LOUD: American Muslim
Women Speak, the first anthology collecting the voices of American Muslim women. The
book presents American Muslim women dealing with the complexities of forging their own
identities while contributing powerfully to public life. She is a graduate of Columbia
University.
Saleemah Abdul Ghafar
Amir Hussain
Dr. Amir Hussain is Associate Professor in the Department of Theological Studies at Loyola
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 78/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
p g y
Marymount University in Los Angeles, where he teaches courses on world religions. His
own particular speciality is the study of Islam, focusing on contemporary Muslim societies
in North America. Although born in Pakistan, Amir immigrated to Canada with his family
when he was four. His academic degrees (BSc, MA, PhD) are all from the University of
Toronto where he received a number of awards, including the university’s highest award for
alumni service. Amir’s PhD dissertation was on Muslim communities in Toronto. In 2008,
Amir was chosen by vote of LMU students as the Professor of the year.
Amir’s new book is an introduction to Islam for North Americans entitled Oil and Water: Two
Faiths, One God (Kelowna: Copper House, 2006). He is currently working on a scholarly
book on Islam in Canada entitled Canadian Faces of Islam; and a textbook entitled
Muslims: Islam in the West in the 21st Century.
Reza Aslan
Is the Co-Founder and Chief Creative officer of BoomGen studios, the premier entertainment
brand for creative content from and about the Greater Middle East and President of
AppOvation Labs, a mobile applications company. Born in Iran, he lives in Los Angeles with
his wife (author and entrepreneur Jessica Jackley) where he is Associate Professor of
Creative Writing at the University of California, Riverside. Aslan’s first book is theInternational Bestseller, No god but God: The Origins, Evolution, and Future of Islam, which
has been translated into thirteen languages, and named one of the 100 most important
books of the last decade. He is also the author of How to Win a Cosmic War (published in
paperback as Beyond Fundamentalism: Confronting Religious Extremism in a Globalized
Age), as well as editor of two volumes: Tablet and Pen: Literary Landscapes from the
Modern Middle East, and Muslims and Jews in America: Commonalties, Contentions, andComplexities.
El-Farouk Khaki is a refugee and immigration lawyer. His practice primarily involves
representing women fleeing gender violence, LGBTQI People fleeing persecution because of
th i l i t ti d d id tit ll l fl i ti
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 79/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
their sexual orientation and or gender identity, as well as people fleeing persecution
because of their HIV status.
A human rights and social just ice advocate, he leadership has been recognized by the
awards he has received including: 2006 “Excellence in Spirituality” Award – Pride Toronto;
2007 Hero Award, Canadian Bar Association The Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
Conference; 2007 Steinert & Ferreiro Award from the Lesbian & Gay Community Appeal.
El-Farouk Khaki
In 2009 in addition to being the Grand Marshall for the 2009 Toronto Pride Parade, he was
also the recipient of the “Can’t Stop, Won’t Stop”, Pride Toronto Theme Award. In 2008, heran for Canadian Federal Parliament in two elections for the New Democratic Party of
Canada.
El-Farouk is the founder of Salaam: Queer Muslim community, an organization he originally
started in 1991. In May 2009, he co-founded the el-Tawhid Juma Circle with his partner Troy
Jackson and dear friend, Dr. Laury Silvers. He is also co-founder of Canadian Muslim Union
of which he is Secretary General, as well as co-Founder of the Muslim AIDS Project. El-
Farouk has set on many boards and is a public speaker on Islam, the Immigration and
Refugee system, human rights, racism, politics and HIV/AIDS.
Co-founder, President – Ani Zonneveld
Ani Zonneveld, is Co-founder and President of Muslims for Progressive Values (MPV), a 501
(c) (3) founded in 2007. In the short years since inception, Ani presided over MPV’s
expansion to include chapters and affiliates in Los Angeles, Washington DC, Atlanta, SaltLake City, Columbus (OH), as well as Ottawa and Toronto, Canada. She has organized
numerous interfaith arts and music festivals, participated in many interfaith dialogues and is
a strong supporter of LGBTQ rights. She is the brainchild of Literary Zikr – a project that
counters radical Islam on-line and most recently MPV’s first book, an anthology titled
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 80/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
“Progressive Muslim Identities – Personal Stories from the U.S. and Canada”. Ani is a
singer/songwriter/producer and is the first woman to release an English Islamic pop album in
the U.S., titled “Ummah Wake Up” followed by “One”. Her latest project “Islamic Hymns-
Celebration of Life” establishes a new musical genre. Ani performs wedding services for
mixed faith and gay couples and in 2006, she was named a Muslim Leader of Tomorrow by
the American Society for Muslim Advancement.
Daayiee Abdullah – MPV Director of LGBT Outreach / D.C. Director
Daayiee is a prominent sexuality rights activist within Muslim and interfaith contexts, and
Imam of Masjid el-Tawhid An-Nur Al-Isslaah (Mosque for Enlightenment and Reform), and
affiliated with the California-based organization MPV (Muslims for Progressive Values) asMPV-Washington, DC co-chapter leader. Daayiee is a scholar, a former public interest
lawyer and a specialistin Shari’ah Sciences/Quranic Interpretation. He frequently lectures
internationally on progressive Muslim concepts, interfaith networking and the development of
inclusive revisions of Islamic theological thought and interpretations of shari’ah. He has also
long been involved in actively promoting understanding and awareness of issues of racial,
sexual and gender equality both within and beyond Muslim communities.
Is Islamic Family Law today really based on Shari’a?
Why it is important to know.
By Professor Abdullahi Ahmed An-Nai’m
Adapted for MPV by Tynan Power
Preface
This is adapted from the chapter “Shari’a and Islamic Family Law: Transition and
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 81/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Transformation” by Professor Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im in Islamic Family Law in a
Changing World: A Global Resource Book. Professor An-Na’im shows us that Islamic
Family Law (IFL) is not the same as Shari’a. Since IFL is based on human interpretationand judgment, it is not a divine order from God to Muslims. It can be changed based on new
interpretations in order to achieve justice and equality for Muslim women in their families and
communities today.
The pronunciation key is intended to give English-speaking readers a close approximation of
the word in Arabic. It can not provide a perfect equivalent, however, because some Arabic
sounds do not exist in English. We have chosen to use the widely-used Common Era (also
known as Christian or Gregorian) calendar, rather than the Islamic Hijri (AH) calendar.
Common Era dates end in CE.
There is a lot of confusion about Shari’a and Islamic Family Law
What is Shari’a?
In Arabic, the word “shari’a” means “way” or “path”. It is pronounced SHA-ree-ah. Shari’a is
not a legal system. It is the overall way of life of Islam, as people understand it according totraditional, early interpretations. These early interpretations date from 700 to 900 CE, not
long after the Prophet Muhammad(PBUH) died in 632 CE. Shari’a can evolve with Islamic
societies to address their needs today.
Is Shari’a the “word of God”?
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 82/112
use Shari’a to try to figure out what people should do. The goal was to try to get as close as
possible to what the Prophet Muhammad(PBUH) would have said if he were still around.
When early scholars interpreted Shari’a, it was called ijtihad.
Even very religious, well-educated scholars could make mistakes, though. Sometimes they
disagreed with each other That is why there are different Islamic schools of thought called
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 83/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
disagreed with each other. That is why there are different Islamic schools of thought, called
madhahib.
Is there a difference between Shari’a and Islamic Law?Yes. Shari’a isn’t a legal system. It includes Islamic principles to help guide people to new
answers, and it includes common cultural practices that had to do with a specific t ime and
place in history. Muslim rulers wanted a way to make Shari’a into law. To do that, they
decided which rules needed to be laws, first. Then they used interpretations of Shari’a to
show people that the new laws were Islamic. The result was what we call Islamic Law.
Islamic Law is always based on someone’s interpretation of the Shari’a (which is an
interpretation of the Qur’an and Hadith). Because it is a human interpretation, Islamic Law
can mean different things in different places and at different times in history.
Today, interpretations of Shari’a are usually still limited to rules of interpretation (called usul
al-fiqh) that were established by early scholars before 900 CE. More recently scholars have
called for new ijtihad to meet the changing needs of modern Islamic societies.
Do Islamic countries today use Islamic Law?
Yes and no. Many Islamic countries believe they are following Shari’a in family law matters,
but Shari’a is not a legal system. These countries actually use some kind of Islamic Law in
family matters, and in all other matters apply European-style law left over from colonization.
Iran, Saudi Arabia and a few other countries claim that most of their laws are based on
Shari’a, but, in fact, most of those laws are secular. Even those laws which come from
Islamic Law are different from place to place because they are interpreted by people—andthose people are influenced by their culture.
Still, Islamic Law is followed by many Muslims as a way of life, not as law. In that case, it is
a personal choice, based on the person’s own understanding and beliefs.
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 84/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Are all laws in Islamic countries based on Islamic Law?
No. Today, many Islamic countries use some version of Islamic Family Law (also called
“IFL” in this article), even if they use secular laws for all other kinds of laws.
What is Islamic Family Law?
IFL is a type of law that covers topics like marriage, divorce, custody of children and the
status of women. It also may be called Muslim Personal Status Law. The idea of IFL was
introduced by European colonial powers. Colonial governments separated the field of family
law from the rest of Shari’a, then enforced IFL as national law, according to European
models of government. All other fields of law came under secular European-style laws.
Was Shari’a used as law at the time of the Prophet Muhammad(PBUH)?
No. During the life of the Prophet Muhammad(PBUH) and for 150 years after he died, the
Shari’a did not exist the way we think of it today. People did not treat Shari’a as a system of
laws.
Were early Islamic societies governed by Islamic Law?
No. Early Islamic societies were ruled by caliphs (from Arabic “khalifa”)—such as Al-Khulafa
al-Rashidun (the “Rightly-Guided Caliphs”)—and later by kings and emperors. These rulers
mixed Islamic ideas with secular rules that were already in place or that had been the
common practice. These early Muslim empires did not have what we now call “law”, with the
government making laws that apply to all people and enforcing the laws everywhere in the
same way. Communities of Muslims applied Shari’a in their own informal ways. Over time,
laws changed. Some new rulers tried to bring the law closer to Islamic Law—as they
understood it at the time, which might have been different from how previous rulers
understood it. Others introduced new secular laws based on culture or their personal goals.
Did laws in Islamic countries change when they were colonized?
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 85/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
d a s s a c cou t es c a ge e t ey e e co o ed
Yes. Almost all Islamic countries were controlled by European, non-Islamic countries. This
was called colonization, and the Islamic countries were called colonies or protectorates of the European nations that controlled them. The European countries in power, such as
Britain and France, were called colonial powers. These countries brought their own laws and
practices and put them to use in the Islamic countries they controlled.
Before colonization, Shari’a was observed by Muslims, but it was not enforced by
government. Colonization changed that.
Traditional application of Shari’a by communities was replaced by European-style laws that
were developed so the government could enforce them.
For example, before colonization, the parties in a legal case would select the madhab
(school of thought) they wanted to apply to their case. They would select a judge (qadi) who
was an expert in that madhab and present their case. That way both parties gave the judge
the authority to make a decision. They knew the judgment was consistent with their own
beliefs, and they could accept that the decision of the judge was valid. During colonial rule,that traditional choice was no longer possible. European legal codes were created and
applied by the government, according to its own authority. People didn’t have a choice in the
matter: they had no choice which madhab they wanted to follow or which judge they wanted
to consult.
This happened in all fields of law, but it happened differently in family law. Sharia wassupposed to continue to apply to family law. Even in family law matters, though, government
officials selected particular principles of Shari’a to be turned into laws, based on their own
preference. Sometimes the rulers mixed very different views from different scholars, turning
them into rules that none of the scholars would accept as valid.
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 86/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
After independence, Muslim rulers continued trying to apply Shari’a as law based on the
system they were used to—the colonial system. The result was an Islamic Family Law that
is very similar to the European laws from the colonial time. To make these laws more
acceptable to people, Islamic governments say that the family law is “Islamic.”
Were there secular courts in Islamic countries before colonization?
Yes. Secular courts existed from the Umayyad period (661-750 CE) and the Abassid period
(starting around 750 CE). These secular courts covered many practical issues for the nation,
while Shari’a judges dealt with things they considered “religious matters,” including family
law. In later times, these two legal systems combined into a system in which secular judges consulted with Islamic scholars, as needed. An Islamic scholar, or mufti, could offer
a religious ruling, or fatwa, based on his interpretation of Shari’a. A secular judge could then
use the fatwa to make a legal ruling.
Did colonization change the legal systems in Islamic countries?
Yes, but not entirely. In the 1800s, colonial powers created secular courts, especially to
deal with civil and criminal cases using colonial laws. In colonized countries, Islamic Law
and existing secular laws were often replaced by these new colonial laws. In practice,
Islamic Law became more limited, often reduced to the field of family law.
Understanding how Islamic Family Law is used today
Can Islamic Law systems today claim to be Shari’a?
No. Islamic countries today apply laws that are based on human interpretation and
judgment, even when they are called Islamic Law. Islamic Law is not Shari’a for several
reasons:
•Shari’a is a moral religious system, not a legal system.
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 87/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
•Whenever countries claim to apply Islamic Law, as in IFL, they can only apply the laws
rulers select from different interpretations of Shari’a. Some laws are chosen over others
because of the ruler’s personal preferences or because those rules serve the ruler’s politicalgoals. The result would not be considered Shari’a by any madhab (school of Islamic
thought).
•Law requires people to do specific things, while the Qur’an says there is no compulsion in
matters of faith. Islam gives Muslims the freedom to choose among different views—a
choice only the individual believer can make, because in Islam, only the individual is
responsible for his or her choices before God.
Is there a problem with applying Islamic Law in only a few areas, such as family law?
Yes. Shari’a, whether called Islamic Law or not, contains religious obligations for Muslims—
but they must be observed voluntarily. When the government enforces Shari’a rules as law,
Muslims lose their freedom to choose from different views—and since they can’t choose,
they also lose the chance to be rewarded by God for making good choices. Enforcement by
the government encourages hypocrisy (saying or doing one thing, while believing another)
and takes away freedom of belief.
Another problem is that Shari’a is a system of principles that covers all areas of life. Shari’a
takes into account the fact that different areas of life—from work to worship, from community
to family life—are connected. Trying to apply Shari’a as Islamic Law in only some areas of
life makes those areas distorted. For example, Shari’a guidelines about support of a
divorced woman are based on the legal and social relationships between people at a
particular time in history. Laws governing legal and social relationships changed over the
centuries, though. Trying to apply Shari’a guidelines about support when the relationships
have actually changed can lead to serious problems that harm women and families. The
result is often also far from showing the fairness and justice that the Prophet Muhammad
taught.
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 88/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
For example, Shari’a assumes that men are responsible for supporting the women in their
families, including their unmarried and divorced sisters. Today’s laws, however, don’t makebrothers legally responsible for supporting their sisters. If divorced women are not supported
by their ex-husbands—and, in some places, are not able to work—and at the same time,
male family members are not required to support them, the result is unjust and contrary to
Islam.
Is there a reason people resist changing family law in Islamic countries?
Yes. Family law has been used as a “token” that rulers could offer to religious leaders, so
the religious leaders wouldn’t object to other secular laws, such as those concerning
business or usury (interest-based banking and loans). Colonial powers often controlled
everything except family law. Even Muslim rulers often have left this area of law to religious
scholars as a way to keep peace and gain political support. For that reason, IFL has
become a symbol of Muslim religious identity. Even when IFL is unjust toward women,
some Muslims feel that giving it up will mean the end of Islam. The battle over IFL has
become a battle for Muslim identity, rather than a battle for what is right in principle—or
what is truly Islamic.
Is the status of women particularly affected by politics in Islamic countries?
Yes. Because family law has become symbolic, it is often used to show the differences
between different groups. People have used the status of women as an example of what
they believe in—for example: forcing women to wear headscarves, forcing them not to, or
allowing them to choose; giving women the right to vote or giving only men the right to vote;
providing schools for girls, allowing girls to attend mixed-gender schools, or forbidding girls
from attending school. Some have argued that it is necessary to stop—and reverse—any
movement towards equality for women. They feel Islamic Law should not be abandoned in
the one area where, often, it is still used. Others have argued that abandoning Islamic
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 89/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Family Law is necessary to make Islamic societies more fair for all. Yet both these
arguments make the mistake of assuming that today’s Islamic Family Law is the same
thing as Shari’a and the religion of Islam. In fact, it is all human interpretation.
Could Islamic countries today apply Shari’a across the board as law?
No—and they shouldn’t. There are several reasons for this.
1.Shari’a is a set of guidelines for living a responsible moral life. It covers how a person can
relate to God and to others ethically. It is open-ended and flexible, while law is not. Making
Shari’a law changes it.
2.The principles of Shari’a do not provide everything needed for a complete legal system.
3.Islamic countries today are part of a world system, which is based on a European model
of nation-state. This affects political, economic and social relationships within and among
Islamic nations. By using this model, Islamic countries take on national and international
obligations, such as participation in human rights t reaties, the World Bank and World Trade
Organization, to name a few. Some international treaties, such as those concerning human
rights, reflect the teachings of the Qur’an and the Prophet Muhammad(PBUH). However,
they are applied under the authority of international law, not under the authority of Islam.
What’s more, these agreements are binding on nations—even if some of their provisions
violate Shari’a. If Islamic societies were to reject this world system and the European model
of nation-state in order to try to live completely in accordance with Shari’a, it would require
changing everything from government systems to political boundaries. It would isolate these
societies from the rest of the world, economically and politically.
If governments don’t apply Islamic Law, won’t people fall away from Islam?
No. Current Islamic Law systems are not Shari’a, so they are not truly Islamic in the first
place. What’s more, whether or not their governments use Islamic Law, individuals should
practice Islam and follow their understanding of Shari’a, by choice and conviction—not out of
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 90/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
fear of the government. In that case, their choices are not forced by law. Instead, they are
guided by faith. The earliest Muslims did not live under Shari’a law, yet they are considered
by most Muslims to be more devout than all the generations that came after them. Their choices were guided by faith—not fear of legal action. Even today, Islam is growing in
nations that are not historically Muslim and which do not have governments that claim to be
Islamic.
Is there a place for human will in Islam?
Yes. There is a Hadith of the Prophet PBUH that says “All actions are judged according to
intention, and each person receives credit or blame according to her or his intention.”
Human will and freedom of choice are the foundation of all religious responsibility. That is
why children and people with severe mental illness are not considered religiously
responsible in Islam. Human will is the very thing that sets people apart from other living
things, according to Islamic sources. Human will allows people to make choices and to
interpret how they should live their lives. Human will can guide people to moral choices,
whether or not there are laws that demand those choices—or forbid them.
In Islam, when people choose to do the morally right thing, it is more highly rewarded thanwhen they have no choice. The Qur’an teaches that there is no compulsion in religion—
people should not be forced (by law, coercion or physical force) to follow any part of Islam.
Forcing people takes away their choice and prevents them from being able to get closer to
Allah through their own choices based on their faith.
Does human will play a role in law?Yes. Without free will, there can be no responsibility—no one can be blamed or rewarded for
their actions. Human will is a fundamental part of law on all levels.
•Laws exist to limit human will
•Human rulers exercise their wills when they create laws
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 91/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
y
•Human rulers exercise their wills when they choose how to enforce laws
•Human judges exercise their wills when they interpret laws
•Human beings in all walks of life exercise their wills when they decide whether or not to
follow laws
The role of human will is the reason why Shari’a differs so much among Islamic countries.
Is there a need to transform family law in Islamic countries?
Yes. Some people fiercely hold on to family law as symbolic of their faith, with the mistaken
idea that Islamic Family Law is Shari’a. This is not true, however. Current Islamic Law cannot be called Shari’a. Applying Shari’a as law changes it, and applying only certain parts of
Shari’a causes social problems, such as human rights issues. Family law in Islamic
countries today should be guided by fair social policies, as well as Islamic principles that do
not distort the Qur’an.
For more information about these and related topics:
•Islamic Family Law in a Changing World: A Global Resource Book, ed. Abdullahi Ahmed
An-Na’im. Zed Books. 2002.
•Toward an Islamic Reformation: Civil Liberties, Human Rights and International Law.
Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im. Syracuse University Press. 1990.
•Islam and the Secular State: Negotiating the Future of Sharia. Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im.
Harvard University Press. 2008.
More about Shari’a and modern law can be found in Chapter 2 of Toward an Islamic
Reformation and Chapter 1 of Islam and the Secular State. Many sources, in Arabic and
English, are given in those chapters.
Read the Notes page for definitions of terms and more about different Islamic schools of
h h
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 92/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
thought.
Dr. Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im is Charles Howard Candler Professor of Law at EmoryUniversity. He studied law and Sharia at the University of Khartoum, in his native Sudan, and
Cambridge, England and earned his Ph.D. from the University of Edinburgh, Scotland. He
has taught law since 1976, first in Sudan, and then in the USA, Canada, and Sweden. He is
the author of Islam and the Secular State (2008); African Constitutionalism and the Role of
Islam (2006); and Toward an Islamic Reformation: Civil liberties, human rights and
international law (1990). He is also the editor of Human Rights under African Constitutions
(2003); Islamic Family Law in a Changing World: A Global Resource Book (2002); Cultural
Transformation and Human Rights in Africa (2002); The Cultural Dimensions of Human
Rights in the Arab World (in Arabic, 1994); Human Rights in Cross-Cultural Perspectives:
Quest for Consensus (1992). Websites of his research projects (Women and Land in Africa,
Islamic Family Law and Islam and Human Rights) are all linked to his homepage at
http://www.law.emory.edu/aannaim . His current project on the Future of Shari`a (Islamic
Law) can be viewed at http://sharia.law.emory.edu.
In his publications in English, Professor An-Na’im uses simplified transliteration (spelling of Arabic terms in English letters).
Literary Zikr is owned and managed by Muslims for Progressive Values, a 501(c) (3) non-
profit organization.
Sexual diversity in Islam:Is there room in Islam for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Muslims?
By Dr. Scott Siraj al-Haqq Kugle | Adapted for MPV by Tynan Power
© 2010 Muslims for Progressive Values
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 93/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Understanding sexual diversity in Islam Some religions seem to view sex as shameful or
unclean. Is that true of Islam?
No. In early Islamic history, sex was seen as a positive part of human life. The Prophet
Muhammad(PBUH) helped people see that spiritual life and sexual life are connected. Early
Muslim scholars talked about sex in a very straight-forward way as a normal, positive part of
life. Al-Ghazali, a Muslim scholar who lived more than 900 years ago, called sexual pleasure
a blessing from God. Even the Qur’an (the Muslim holy book) describes heaven as a
paradise of a physical kind. Heaven is described as containing “rewards” such as rivers of
milk and honey that make it appealing to the senses—including sexual desires.
Is sexuality the same as “lust”?
No. Sexuality is about a lot more than desire or “lust.” Sexuality involves desire, but also
includes thoughts, acts, and how one sees oneself and others. It is part of a person’s
identity. It affects how people relate to each other. It’s important to realize, too, that desire
itself is not a bad thing in Islam. There is a well-known hadith, or story about the life of the
Prophet Muhammad(PBUH), in which the Prophet said “Three things were made beloved to
me in this world of yours: women, perfume and prayer.” This hadith indicates that sexual
desire is something the Prophet cherished.
Is sexuality only considered “good” if it is used to create children?
No. The Prophet Muhammad(PBUH) and early scholars said that “sexual play” is a goodthing. In fact, in one hadith, Muhammad said that God rewards people for “sexual play.” The
term “sexual play” is not defined in the Qur’an or Hadith. Some people understand it to
mean sex acts other than intercourse. “Sexual “play” does not necessarily lead to making
children, so this indicates that sex is considered good and healthy whether or not it is for
the purpose of creating children.
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 94/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
g
So, in Islam, is it “anything goes” when it comes to sex?
No. There are limits. Most of those limits have to do with relationships between people who
have sex. The limits don’t have to do with the sex acts themselves, though. For example:
*In Islam, brothers and sisters cannot marry. There are verses of the Qur’an that specifically
mention who can and can not marry. This limit prevents men and women who are closely
related from creating children who may have serious health risks.
*In Islam, men and women should not have sex if they do not have a known, clear relationship with each other. This limit helps ensure that children will be cared for and
supported by both parents. This limit was especially important for women at a time when
men had more opportunities to work and earn money. Clear relationships also help both
people in a relationship to know what they can expect from each other—what rights and
responsibilities they have.
Is Islamic law clear on what is and isn’t permissible?
In some cases—like in the Qur’an verses that say brothers and sisters can not marry—it is
clear. In other cases, it is not so clear. Scholars today often talk about Islamic law as if it
were always clear and simple. Actually, Islamic law is pretty complex. The law comes from
many sources, not just the Qur’an. Some of those sources disagree with each other and
most are based on the opinions of human beings. In some cultures, Islamic law follows the
teachings of scholars with one viewpoint, while in other cultures Islamic law may follow
different scholars with different views. (There is more about Islamic law, below.)
At the Prophet’s time, was sex only permitted between a formally-married husband and
wife?
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 95/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
No. Sex was allowed as part of a number of relationships. Most of these relationships
involved a kind of contract, or agreement. Some relationship contracts were formal. A formalmarriage would include witnesses and the marriage agreement might be written down and
signed. Other relationship contracts were informal—they were understood by the community
at the time but might not be written down or include a formal ceremony with witnesses. In
the time of the Prophet Muhammad(PBUH), sex could be part of informal contract
relationships, such as “temporary marriages.” When slavery was legal, sexual relationships
between slaves and their owners also was permitted.
Today, we usually don’t think of marriages and other relationships “contracts,” but many
relationships are based on an agreement of some kind. Some relationship agreements are
written down and legally tie people together, while other relationship agreements are made
orally (by talking).
Aren’t Islamic rules about sex only about relationships between men and women?
Not necessarily. The Qur’an gives rules for relationships between men and women, but itdoesn’t set rules for same-sex (gay or lesbian) relationships. That doesn’t mean it forbids
relationships between people of the same sex. There were a number of reasons why Islamic
law focused on relationships between men and women. For one thing, Muslim jurists saw
straight, or heterosexual, relationships as the major concern because they led to
pregnancy. Same-sex couples may have or raise children but, for them, having children is
not an accidental side-effect of having sex.
The early Muslim jurists wanted to avoid situations where a child was born without the
support a father could bring. At that time, men earned the most income and few women had
substantial income of their own. Because of inequality between men and women, having a
man in the family helped the family financially and socially.
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 96/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Another reason Islamic jurists talked a lot about straight relationships is that they were
trying to address the needs of most people. Since most people are straight (or
heterosexual), their needs were the primary concern of scholars. That does not mean that
other sexual identities don’t exist. It also doesn’t mean that other sexual identities are
forbidden just because they are not mentioned.
Why is sex such a “hot” topic among Muslims?
There are two main reasons why sex is such a “hot” topic. Rules about sex and gender can
be used to keep men in positions of power over women. Rules about sexual relationships
are often bent to benefit men, rather than staying true to the rule as it is in the Qur’an. For
example, in many Islamic cultures, when women have sex with men before marriage it
brings shame on them and their families. No similar shame is brought on a man’s family if
he has sex before marriage. The Qur’an doesn’t make any distinction between the sin of the
two people involved, though. When the rule is bent to bring more shame and harsh
punishments on women, it means women have a lot to lose if they have sex before
marriage, while men do not face the same risks. The rule works to control women, but it
allows men to do what they wish.
Another reason sex is a “hot” topic among Muslims has to do with politics. Many Islamic
countries were colonized by non-Muslim European countries. The colonial rulers replaced
Islamic legal systems with European laws. Even after the colonial rulers left, many Muslims
felt as if their way of life was threatened. Some Muslims who immigrate to the U.S. or other
western countries also fear that their culture will be lost in their new country. When people
feel threatened and fearful, they often try to keep control over whatever they can. Limiting
sex and women’s rights can seem like easy ways to feel more “in control.”
0 0 Rate This
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 97/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
0 0 Rate This
Reply
plum December 8, 2012 at 10:59 am
Hi Bob,
That is very interesting!
Does your movement allow also for a gay couple to be voted in office as the Head
of the State?
Would his gay partner become the First Ladyman? If a picture of them would be
required on the note of USA dollar whom would you choose bum?
You disgust us dude!
Stop teaching us your regressive principles as they are nothing but full of bulls!
Many have tried to change Islam but their efforts have gone in vain because Islam
is based on Quran and Quran cannot be changed!
Regards
plum
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 98/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
0 0 Rate This
Reply
Bob November 26, 2012 at 10:15 pm
YO My Man,
MUSLIMS FOR PROGRESSIVE VALUES say we just don’t understand them.
Sexual diversity in Islam:
Is there room in Islam for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Muslims?
By Dr. Scott Siraj al-Haqq Kugle | Adapted for MPV by Tynan Power
© 2010 Muslims for Progressive Values
Page: Preface | 2 | 3 | Notes 1 | Notes 2 | Notes 3 | Notes 4
Understanding sexual diversity in Islam Some religions seem to view sex as shameful or
unclean. Is that true of Islam?
No. In early Islamic history, sex was seen as a positive part of human life. The ProphetMuhammad(PBUH) helped people see that spiritual life and sexual life are connected. Early
Muslim scholars talked about sex in a very straight-forward way as a normal, positive part of
life. Al-Ghazali, a Muslim scholar who lived more than 900 years ago, called sexual pleasure
a blessing from God. Even the Qur’an (the Muslim holy book) describes heaven as a
paradise of a physical kind. Heaven is described as containing “rewards” such as rivers of
ilk d h th t k it li t th i l di l d i
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 99/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
milk and honey that make it appealing to the senses—including sexual desires.
Is sexuality the same as “lust”?
No. Sexuality is about a lot more than desire or “lust.” Sexuality involves desire, but also
includes thoughts, acts, and how one sees oneself and others. It is part of a person’s
identity. It affects how people relate to each other. It’s important to realize, too, that desire
itself is not a bad thing in Islam. There is a well-known hadith, or story about the life of the
Prophet Muhammad(PBUH), in which the Prophet said “Three things were made beloved to
me in this world of yours: women, perfume and prayer.” This hadith indicates that sexualdesire is something the Prophet cherished.
Is sexuality only considered “good” if it is used to create children?
No. The Prophet Muhammad(PBUH) and early scholars said that “sexual play” is a good
thing. In fact, in one hadith, Muhammad said that God rewards people for “sexual play.” The
term “sexual play” is not defined in the Qur’an or Hadith. Some people understand it to
mean sex acts other than intercourse. “Sexual “play” does not necessarily lead to making
children, so this indicates that sex is considered good and healthy whether or not it is for
the purpose of creating children.
So, in Islam, is it “anything goes” when it comes to sex?
No. There are limits. Most of those limits have to do with relationships between people whohave sex. The limits don’t have to do with the sex acts themselves, though. For example:
*In Islam, brothers and sisters cannot marry. There are verses of the Qur’an that specifically
mention who can and can not marry. This limit prevents men and women who are closely
related from creating children who may have serious health risks.
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 100/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
*In Islam, men and women should not have sex if they do not have a known, clear
relationship with each other. This limit helps ensure that children will be cared for and
supported by both parents. This limit was especially important for women at a time when
men had more opportunities to work and earn money. Clear relationships also help both
people in a relationship to know what they can expect from each other—what rights and
responsibilities they have.
Is Islamic law clear on what is and isn’t permissible?
In some cases—like in the Qur’an verses that say brothers and sisters can not marry—it isclear. In other cases, it is not so clear. Scholars today often talk about Islamic law as if it
were always clear and simple. Actually, Islamic law is pretty complex. The law comes from
many sources, not just the Qur’an. Some of those sources disagree with each other and
most are based on the opinions of human beings. In some cultures, Islamic law follows the
teachings of scholars with one viewpoint, while in other cultures Islamic law may follow
different scholars with different views. (There is more about Islamic law, below.)
At the Prophet’s time, was sex only permitted between a formally-married husband and
wife?
No. Sex was allowed as part of a number of relationships. Most of these relationships
involved a kind of contract, or agreement. Some relationship contracts were formal. A formal
marriage would include witnesses and the marriage agreement might be written down and
signed. Other relationship contracts were informal—they were understood by the community
at the time but might not be written down or include a formal ceremony with witnesses. In
the time of the Prophet Muhammad(PBUH), sex could be part of informal contract
relationships, such as “temporary marriages.” When slavery was legal, sexual relationships
between slaves and their owners also was permitted.
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 101/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Today, we usually don’t think of marriages and other relationships “contracts,” but many
relationships are based on an agreement of some kind. Some relationship agreements arewritten down and legally tie people together, while other relationship agreements are made
orally (by talking).
Aren’t Islamic rules about sex only about relationships between men and women?
Not necessarily. The Qur’an gives rules for relationships between men and women, but it
doesn’t set rules for same-sex (gay or lesbian) relationships. That doesn’t mean it forbids
relationships between people of the same sex. There were a number of reasons why Islamic
law focused on relationships between men and women. For one thing, Muslim jurists saw
straight, or heterosexual, relationships as the major concern because they led to
pregnancy. Same-sex couples may have or raise children but, for them, having children is
not an accidental side-effect of having sex.
The early Muslim jurists wanted to avoid situations where a child was born without the
support a father could bring. At that time, men earned the most income and few women hadsubstantial income of their own. Because of inequality between men and women, having a
man in the family helped the family financially and socially.
Another reason Islamic jurists talked a lot about straight relationships is that they were
trying to address the needs of most people. Since most people are straight (or
heterosexual), their needs were the primary concern of scholars. That does not mean that
other sexual identities don’t exist. It also doesn’t mean that other sexual identities are
forbidden just because they are not mentioned.
Why is sex such a “hot” topic among Muslims?
There are two main reasons why sex is such a “hot” topic. Rules about sex and gender can
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 102/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
y p g
be used to keep men in positions of power over women. Rules about sexual relationships
are often bent to benefit men, rather than staying true to the rule as it is in the Qur’an. For example, in many Islamic cultures, when women have sex with men before marriage it
brings shame on them and their families. No similar shame is brought on a man’s family if
he has sex before marriage. The Qur’an doesn’t make any distinction between the sin of the
two people involved, though. When the rule is bent to bring more shame and harsh
punishments on women, it means women have a lot to lose if they have sex before
marriage, while men do not face the same risks. The rule works to control women, but it
allows men to do what they wish.
Another reason sex is a “hot” topic among Muslims has to do with politics. Many Islamic
countries were colonized by non-Muslim European countries. The colonial rulers replaced
Islamic legal systems with European laws. Even after the colonial rulers left, many Muslims
felt as if their way of life was threatened. Some Muslims who immigrate to the U.S. or other
western countries also fear that their culture will be lost in their new country. When people
feel threatened and fearful, they often try to keep control over whatever they can. Limiting
sex and women’s rights can seem like easy ways to feel more “in control.”
MPV establishes and nurtures vibrant progressive Muslim communities. We do this by
creating opportunities for religious discourse, volunteer and community activities, and
cultural events bringing together the arts, spirituality and social activism.
MPV is a progressive Muslim voice on contemporary issues. We voice our perspectives byparticipating in civil discourse, engaging with the media and government entities, and by
partnering with both Muslim and non-Muslim progressive organizations.
MPV promotes theologically-sound frameworks for Islamic liberalism. We seek to
reinvigorate the Islamic tradition of ijtihad (critical engagement and interpretation of sacred
texts) and intellectual discourse We do this by collaborating with religious scholars and
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 103/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
texts) and intellectual discourse. We do this by collaborating with religious scholars and
developing position papers on theological issues that are accessible to a wide audience.
Mission:
Muslims for Progressive Values (MPV) is an inclusive community rooted in the traditional
Qur’anic ideals of human dignity and social justice. We welcome all who are interested in
discussing, promoting and working for the implementation of progressive values — human
rights, freedom of expression, and separation of church and state — as well as inclusive and
tolerant understandings of Islam.
BUILDING A PROGRESSIVE MUSLIM COMMUNITY
Too often Muslims in America are asked ‘where are the progressives amongst us? Aren’t
there any Muslims who are for women’s reproductive rights, for LGBTQ rights, for the
separation of Religion and State?’
Muslims for Progressive Values has been in existence s ince 2007. Quietly and diligently we
have been building our progressive community, one city at a time, and now one country at a
time. In the short time since its inception in Los Angeles, we have expanded to include
chapters in Washington DC, Atlanta, Salt Lake City, Columbus (OH), as well as Ottawa and
Toronto, Canada.
We assert that Islam is inherently progressive, inclusive and egalitarian; an understandingfrom which our community is built on and that informs the ten principles of MPV.
0 0 Rate This
Reply
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 104/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
plum December 6, 2012 at 1:25 am
Hey bhai, Phew! Yes, Muslims may agree with you!
Regards
Plum
0 0 Rate This
Reply
NUKE JIHAD January 3, 2013 at 1:05 pm
Jews are much better than muslims. They atleast support humanity.
http://www.algemeiner.com/2012/12/26/jewish-group-condemns-latest-islamic-
terrorist-attack-against-christians-in-nigeria/
0 0 Rate This
Reply
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 105/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Leave a Reply Enter your comment here...
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
Email (required) (Address never made public)
Name (required)
Website
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 106/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Cancel
Connecting to %s
Notify me of follow-up comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.
Post Comment
Share it:-
Follow Blog via Email
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 107/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Follow
Search Website
Search …
Recent Comments
luckylarrysilverstei… on Sharia Believers to March Agai…
Modest Muslim on 124,000 Prophets Lie of I…
Richard Holroyd on ‘Atheists face death in…
ahmed on Why Islamic channels are banne…
ahmed on Why Islamic channels are banne…
ahmed on Why Islamic channels are banne…
ahmed on Why Islamic channels are banne…
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 108/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
ahmed on Why Islamic channels are banne…
luckylarrysilverstei… on Muslim Scholars Confirm Muhamm…
luckylarrysilverstei… on Muslim Scholars Confirm Muhamm…
ajay saha on Pakistani Hindu Refugees Stage…
luckylarrysilverstei… on 124,000 Prophets Lie of I…
luckylarrysilverstei… on 124,000 Prophets Lie of I…
luckylarrysilverstei… on Sharia Believers to March Agai…
luckylarrysilverstei… on Islamic Terrorists Attacked In…
Archives
Select Month
Categories
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 109/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Select Category
Find us on Facebook
The False Prophet
Like
The False Prophet
http://mostintolerantreligion.com/2013/12/11/pak
day/
December 11 at 11:07am
Pakistani Hindu Re fuge es Stage De mons tr ation o
mostintolerantreligion.com
[Indian Express] Over a hundred Hindu refugees from P
of Inter national Human Rights Day. They submitted a me
1,104 people like The False Prophet.
Sharia Believers to March Against Sale of Alcoh
The Shariah Project, a London-based Muslim gr
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 110/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Facebook social plugin
Follow on Twitter
mostintolerantreligion.com/2013/12/11/pak…... fb.me/1MD0AU2I1 1 day ago
Sharia Believers to March Against Sale of Alcohol in London The Shariah Project, a London-based Muslim
group, is... fb.me/TqPTa411 1 day ago
Sharia Believers to March Against Sale of Alcohol in London wp.me/p1S4Sk-JW4 1 day ago
Pakistani Hindu Refugees Stage Demonstration outside UN Office on Rights Day wp.me/p1S4Sk-JVR1 day ago
‘Atheists face death in 13 Muslim countries’ In 13 countries around the world, all of them Muslim, people
who... fb.me/WzN5cYGc 1 day ago
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 111/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
Follow @r ahulraj3865
Blog Stats
254,423 hits
License
The False Prophet by Rahul Raj is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
3.0 Unported License.
Based on a work at mostintolerantreligion.com.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://mostintolerantreligion.com/contact-
me/.
Blog at WordPress.com. The Expound Theme.
8/13/2019 Muslims Blow Up Another
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/muslims-blow-up-another 112/112
pdfcrowd.comopen in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API