+ All Categories
Home > Documents > MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for...

MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for...

Date post: 06-Jun-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
32
MUTCD Update MUTCD NCUTCD IBTTA IOP Committee 1
Transcript
Page 1: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

MUTCD Update

MUTCD NCUTCD IBTTA IOP

Committee

1

Page 2: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

What is the MUTCD? • Since 1927, the Manual

on Uniform Traffic Control Devices is the national standard for traffic control devices used on all streets, highways, bikeways and private roads open to public travel.

• It is the law governing all traffic control devices.

© Gene Hawkins, Zachry Dept. Civil Engineering 2

Page 3: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

What are Traffic Control Devices?

Signs Pavement Markings Signals

3

Page 4: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

MUTCD - Signs

•Function and Purpose •Justification

•Shape •Color

•Dimensions •Placement

•Mounting Height •Symbols

• Retroreflectivity

Ability to reflect light for red, white, yellow or

green colors

4

Page 5: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

FHWA 2009 MUTCD

• First edition to include traffic control devices for toll facilities

• http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/ • Effective: Jan 15, 2010 • States adopted the MUTCD

or equivalent: Jan 15, 2012

5

Page 6: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

FHWA 2009 MUTCD Adoption

6

Page 7: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

FHWA 2016 MUTCD (my guess)

• Notice of Proposed Amendment (NPA) – To Be Issued: late May - early June 2014

• Reorganized – Fewer pages – Fewer standards – More guidance – Better integration between text and figures – More hyperlinks

• New – Purple Pavement Markings for ETC-Only Toll Lanes – Expansion of retroreflectivity

requirements for blue and brown signs – Toll Interoperability Symbol

7

Page 8: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

MUTCD Update

MUTCD NCUTCD IBTTA IOP

Committee

8

Page 9: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

• Evaluates new traffic control devices • Recommends revisions to the MUTCD to FHWA • 250 volunteers (traffic engineers)

– Motorists – Engineering – Safety – Law Enforcement – Research, Accessibility – Railroads, Bicycles, Transit – Toll Roads

NCUTCD

9

Page 10: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

20 Sponsoring Organizations – Motorists (AAA) – Engineering (AASHTO) – Safety (ATTSA) – Law Enforcement (IACP) – Research, Accessibility – Railroads, Bicycles, Transit – Toll Roads (IBTTA)

NCUTCD

10

Page 11: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

Toll Roads Represented Toll & Managed Lanes Task Force

• E-470 Public Highway Authority • Golden Gate Bridge, Hwy & Transportation District • Illinois State Highway Toll Authority • Maine Turnpike Authority • Maryland Transportation Authority • Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission • Port Authority of NY and NJ • Delaware DOT • Florida DOT • North Carolina DOT • Texas DOT • Consultants

NCUTCD

11

Page 12: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

MUTCD Update

MUTCD NCUTCD IBTTA IOP

Committee

12

Page 13: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

Interoperability (IOP)

MAP-21: All toll roads to be interoperable by June 2016

IBTTA Board of Directors

Roadside Ops Sub-Cmte

Back Office Ops Sub-Cmte

Communications & Marketing

Sub-Cmte

IOP Steering Committee

IBTTA IOP Committee

13

Page 14: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

C&M Subcommittee Members Representing • LISA TELLES, Transportation Corridor Agencies CA

• JESSICA CARSON, E-470 Public Highway Authority CO, UT, KS, OK

• KIMBERLEE POULTON, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise FL, GA, NC, SC

• JENNIFER CHARLEBOIS, Washington DOT WA, OR, BC

ALEXANDRA ATCHISON, Parsons Brinckerhoff

• KIMBERLY JACKSON, North Texas Tollway Authority TX

• SHARON GORDON, South Jersey Transportation Authority E-Z Pass Group PJ WILKINS, E-Z Pass Group

• NEIL GRAY, IBTTA IBTTA

• MAURICE PALUMBO, Golden Gate Bridge MUTCD Compliance

• ROSA ROUNTREE, Egis Projects Inc. Chair

C&M Subcommittee

14

Page 15: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

Which Type of Toll Symbol?

Agency

ETC

AET

Managed Lanes

Road Names

Rental Car & Trucks

15

Page 16: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

Which Type of Toll Symbol?

Corporate

ETC

AET

Managed Lanes

Road Names

Rental Car & Trucks

16

Page 17: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

ETC Symbols – Northeast & Ontario

Illinois State Toll Highway Authority

Northeast Ontario

17

Page 18: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

ETC Symbols - Southeast

Louisiana

Alabama

South Carolina

North Carolina Georgia

18

Page 19: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

ETC Symbols – Florida

Orlando-Orange County Expressway Authority

Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, Tampa Hillsborough County Expressway Auth, Miami-Dade Expressway Authority

Lee County

19

Page 20: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

ETC Symbols – Puerto Rico

20

Page 21: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

ETC Symbols – Midwest & Central Minnesota

Ambassador Bridge, MI & ON

Kansas

Oklahoma

21

Page 22: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

ETC Symbols – Texas

22

(AET) (AET)

Page 23: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

ETC Symbols – Colorado

Statewide ETC

E-470, I-25 (AET)

Northwest Parkway (AET)

23

Page 24: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

ETC Symbols – Northwest & B.C.

Golden Ears Bridge, British Columbia

Port Mann Bridge and Golden Ears Bridge, British Columbia

Washington

Utah

24

Page 25: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

ETC Symbols - California

Statewide ETC

Golden Gate Bridge (AET)

Southern CA Toll Roads (AET)

25

Page 26: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

IOP ETC Symbol Design Principles - 1

• Develop 5 or 6 candidate symbols

• Symbol has to tell the story—”your transponder works on this roadway”

• Can not duplicate existing toll road symbols

• Can not duplicate international toll road symbols

• Potentially serves international audiences (U.S., Canada and Mexico)

• Compliance with MUTCD design principles - No more than 1 to 2 colors - No use of red

C&M Subcommittee

26

Page 27: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

IOP ETC Symbol Design Principles - 2

• Can be an overlay if required

– Will not replace existing logos

– Can be paired with existing brands

• Symbol to be easily identifiable at highway speeds

– Clean

– Simple

– Bold

• Expected Results:

– Stand alone symbol and symbol with text

– Plain language that could replace the term “interoperability”

C&M Subcommittee

27

Page 28: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

Symbol Vetting

• April 26, 2014: FHWA presentation requesting funding and testing of candidate symbols (early 2015)

• Summer 2014: Conduct initial review of candidate symbols • Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to

regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment

– Local review – Social media – Newsletter

• Early 2015: FHWA for testing • June 2015: NCUTCD for comment • 2015-16: FHWA for inclusion in MUTCD

28

C&M Subcommittee

Page 29: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

FHWA 2007 IOP ETC Symbol • Symbol was not

adopted since the NCUTCD believed it was premature and hadn’t been vetted among toll operators

• BTW—symbol used in Portugal

29

Page 31: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

Questions?

MUTCD NCUTCD IBTTA IOP

Committee

31

Page 32: MUTCD Update - IBTTA · Fall 2014: Provide 5 or 6 candidate symbols to regional contacts for ranking and comments • Late 2014: Ranked symbols presented to public for comment –

Thank You Maurice Palumbo, P.E.

Principal Planner/Traffic Engineer Golden Gate Bridge,

Highway & Transportation District San Francisco, CA

[email protected]

32


Recommended