Date post: | 08-Jan-2017 |
Category: |
Business |
Upload: | embassyofukraine |
View: | 49 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Russianʼs military presence in Crimea
70000
258
742
229
170
115
6
105
4
12500
–
92
24
22
37
–
26
2
43000
100
1150
400
150
95
33
7
50
29300
40
583
162
101
56
30
5
16
2
At the moment of separation of the
USSR Black Sea fleet(May 1997)
Before the Russia annexation of
Crimea(January 2014)
After the annexation(October 2016)
Future plans of Russia
till 2020-2025
RUSSIA MILITARY CAPACITIES IN CRIMEA
AS OF OCTOBER 2016
3
Yevpatoriya
Belbek
Kacha
Saky
Gvardiyske
CNB
30th warship div
197th AMHP Bde
68th FFWA Bde
15th sep CoMBde
810th sep MarBde
4th sub Bde
41stmissile ship Bde
RF
1096th SAM regt
11th sub Bde
12th SAM regt
BSF
NavAv BSF
31st AD div
133th log Bde
68th sep Neng regt
43rd s e p n a v a t k a v n r e g t
318t hs e p c o m p a v n r e g t
38th ftravnregt
27th comp avn div
3rd R-radar regt
4th NBC regt
39th HELO regt
37thcomp avnregt
127thsep recon Bde
8th arty regt
126th Sep CdefBde
18th SAM regt
Amphibious forces(large and small
amphibious ships)
Naval component
Assault forces(missile/artillery ships)
Mere area guard (antisubmarine and mine
sweeper)
Submarine Force of the RF BSF Surface Fleet of the RF BSF
Land component
MarineRF BST
Coast-guardRF BST
Costal missile/artillery units RF BST
Airborne unit of RF AF
Air defense assets
Air component
Bomber Aviation of the 4th Air force and Air
defense Army
Attack aviation of the 4th Air force and Air
defense Army
Fighter aviation of the 4th Air force and Air
defense Army
Army aviation of the 4th Air force and Air
defense Army
Navy aviations of the RF BSF
Djankoi
Feodosiya
Perevalne
Simferopol
Sevastopol
NB
GENERAL OPERATIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE RUSSIAN JOINT TASK FORCE IN CRIMEA
120 km
280 km
320 km
420 km
15 SepCorbr
battalion of CMS “Bastion”
battalion of CMS “Utyos”
BSF
Ukraine
Russiabattalion of CMS “Bal”
4
Zaporizhzhya
Sevastopol
Donetsk
Constanca
Kyiv
OdesaKishinev
Bucharest
Varna
Stambul
Sinop
PERFORMANCE ENVELOPE OF COMBAT MISSILE SYSTEM
OF 15th SEPARATE COASTAL MISSILE BRIGADE BSF RF
Sevastopol
Yevpatoriya
Djankoi
Chongar
Solone Ozero
The personnel of battalion tactical group of the247th air-assault regiment (Stavropol) changedpersonnel of battalion tactical group of the 11th
separate air-assault brigade (Ulan-Ude)(on August 11, 2016)
5
Perevalne
Armyansk
RTC 247th airborne regt
Filatovka
SITUATION IN THE NORTHERN REGIONS OF CRIMEA
Simferopol
“North”
№ Name To be put in service
1 «Admiral Grigorovich» transferred in 2016
2 «Admiral Essen» transferred in 2016
3 «Admiral Makarov» 2016
6
Frigate type 11356
NB
37th comp avn regt43rdsep nav
atk avn r e g t
“Triumph” S-400 SAM
Yevpatoria
Saky
Hvardiyske
Simferopol
Feodosia
Sevastopol
Belbek
Kacha
27th comp avn div
38th ftr avn regt
30th warship div
11th ASW Bde
197th AMHP Bde
18th SAMregt
№ Name To be put in
service
1 B-261 «Novorosiysk» transferred in 2015
2 B-237 «Rostov-na-Donu» transferred in 2015
3 B-262 «Staryi Oskol» transferred in 2016
4 B-265 «Krasnodar» 2016-2017
5 B-268 «Velikii Nongorod» 2016-2017
6 B-271 «Kolpino» 2017
Missile ship type 21631
Submarine type 636.3
№ Name To be put in
service
1 «Zelioniy Dol»transferred
in 2015
2 «Serpukhov»transferred
in 2015
3«VyshniyVolochiok»
2017
STRENGTHENING OF THE RUSSIAN JOINT TASK FORCE IN CRIMEA
6 Su-30М2
9 Su-30SМ
Existing means can be used as an asset to deliver nuclear weapon
Advanced assets can deliver nuclear weapon
Tu-22М3 strategic long-range bomber Su-34 fighter-bomber
Range of engagement – 2400 kmМах destruction range of cruise missile
with nuclear munitions - 600 km
Range of engagement – 1100 kmCruise missile and avionic bombs with
nuclear munitions
In 2014-2015 Russia has studied the opportunity to reconstruct the nuclear ammunition depots in Crimea
“Feodosiya-13" special object
7
RUSSIAN JTF IN CRIMEA HAS THE ASSETS TO DELIVER NUCLEAR WEAPON
№ Type Name Weapon
1 guided missile cruiser “Moskva” Missile system
“VULKAN"
2 frigate type 11356 «Admiral Grigorovich»Missile system
“Kalibr-NK"
3missile ship type
21631«Zelioniy Dol»
Missile system“Kalibr-NK"
4missile ship type
21631«Serpukhov»
Missile system“Kalibr-NK"
№ Type Name Weapon
5 submarine type 636.3 B-261 «Novorosiysk»Missile system
“Kalibr-PL"
6 submarine type 636.3 B-237 «Rostov-na-Donu»Missile system
“Kalibr-PL"
7 submarine type 636.3 B-262 «Staryi Oskol»Missile system
“Kalibr-PL"
8 bomber Su-24Avionic bombs with nuclear munitions
NB
8
CNB
Nav Av
BSF
April 18-24, 2016 30th battle ship division, 41st cruise missile ship brigade, 197th assault ship brigade held nuclear weapons exercise.
4 3 r d s e p n a v
a t k a v n r e g t
3 1 8 th s e p c o m
p a v n r e g t 30th battle ship div
11th sub Bde
197thAMHP Bde
41st missile ship Bde
15th sep CoMBde
18th SAM regt
Date: Apr 19-22/2016Involved:from 30th warship div – 3 ships and 5 boatsfrom 41st missile ship Bde – 5 ships and 5 boatsDate: 26-30.04.2016From 197th AMHP Bde involved 7 ships
43rd sep nav atk avn regtDate: Apr 19-22/2016Involved: Su-24М
318th sep comp avn regtDate: Apr 27-29/2016Involved: Be-12 and Аn-26 aircrafts and Ka-27helicopter
15th sep CoMBdeDate: Apr 18-23/2016Involved:sep CoMBat “Bastion-P” (Fiolent cape);sep CoBat “Bal-Т” (Tarkhankut cape);sep CoBat “Club-К” (Feodosiya and Kerch).
Main tasks of exercises are trainings of joint forcesgroupings activities for:• strategic deterrence of adversary;• counteracting to “global strike”;• countermeasures to cruise missiles;• annihilation of essential objects with high-precisionweapons of all types of basing.
Direction of trainingʼs actions showspreparations of Russian JTF in Crimea forconfrontation with Ukraine as well as NATOmember countries
Djankoi
Simferopol
Perevalne
Yevpatoriya
Saky
Kacha
Belbek
Sevastopol
MILITARY TRAININGS OF RUSSIAN JOINT FORCE IN CRIMEA
NB
NB
NB
UKRAINE
ROMANIA
BULGARY
TURKEY
Russia's demonstration of capabilities to conduct abombing strikes on the battle ship groups of NATOStanding Naval Forces and military infrastructure of theBlack Sea region countries
9
Blocking NATO naval forces in bases
127 aRegt
4 Тu-95МS Su-27,Su-34, Su-25
RUSSIA
NB
Engels
BSF
Sevastopol
NB
Su-27,Su-30, Su-33
Constanca
Varna
Burgas
Eregli
MOLDOVA
Stambul
September 7-8, 2016 had been practicednight bombardment at the “Chauda” range
Military training area “Chauda”
4 Тu-22М3
RUSSIAN ELEMENTS OF ARMED FORCES AT THE STRATEGIC COMMAND STAFF
EXERCISE “CAUCASUS-2016” ON THE TERRITORY OF OCCUPIED CRIMEA
(activities of the aerospace forces)
UKRAINE
ROMANIA
BULGARY
TURKEY
10
RUSSIA
BSF
SevastopolNB
Military training area “Opuk”
MOLDOVA
Stambul
With the participation of Minister of DefenceS.Shoygu had been practiced amphibious operationand airborne assault at the “Opuk” range succeededby offensive (September 7-8, 2016).
Minister of Defence of the RFSergey Shoygu
AAMS S-400 “Triumpf”
RUSSIAN ELEMENTS OF ARMED FORCES AT THE STRATEGIC COMMAND STAFF
EXERCISE “CAUCASUS-2016” ON THE TERRITORY OF OCCUPIED CRIMEA
(activities of the air-borne troops and marine corps)
NB
NB
NB
UKRAINE
ROMANIA
BULGARY
TURKEY
11
RUSSIA
NB
BSF
Sevastopol
NB
Constanca
Varna
Burgas
Eregli
MOLDOVA
Istambul
Units and formations of the BSF RF had practiced:• defence setting of all degree by battle ship group;• struggle for survival;• search and rescue operations;• elements of amphibious operation;• gun and missile-firing exercise.
Tactical battle ship group had been formed
(22 ships)
18th SAM regt
Feodosiya
Military training area “Chauda”
Military training area “Opuk”
Submarine “Novorossiysk” had been carried out SLCM “Kalibr-PL”
RUSSIAN ELEMENTS OF ARMED FORCES AT THE STRATEGIC COMMAND STAFF
EXERCISE ““CAUCASUS-2016” ON THE TERRITORY OF OCCUPIED CRIMEA
(activities of the Black Sea fleet)
12
1. The measures of Russian militarization of Crimea and further protectionof its regional interests increase the possibility of the armed conflict inthe region, which could escalate into larger scale armed confrontationwith nuclear weapons.
2. In general, peculiarities of holding of the strategic command staffexercise “CAUCASUS-2016” is evidenced by Russia‘s permanentaggressive policy concerning Ukraine and states of Black Sea region.Russian leadership tries to demonstrate capabilities to settle territoryand political issues (first of all in the area of national interests) in anoppressive way.
CONCLUSIONS