N Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2009...Percentage of clients in treatment on March 31, 2009,...

N-SSATS 2 014

National Survey of Substance

Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2009

Office of Applied Studies Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

Codebook

Acknowledgements

This data file was prepared for the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), by Synectics for Management Decisions, Inc. (Synectics), Arlington, Virginia. Data collection was performed by Mathematica Policy Research (Mathematica), Princeton, New Jersey. Terms of Use These data are distributed under the following terms of use. By continuing past this page, you signify your agreement to comply with the requirements as stated below: Privacy of Study Respondents Any intentional identification of a study respondent (whether an individual or an organization) or unauthorized disclosure of identifiable information violates the pledge given to the providers of the information. Disclosure of identifiable information may also be punishable under federal law. Therefore, users of data agree:

• To use these datasets solely for research or statistical purposes and not for reidentification of specific study respondents.

• To make no use of the identity of any study respondents discovered inadvertently and to report any such discovery to SAMHSA ([email protected]).

Public Domain Notice All material appearing in this report is in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied without permission from SAMHSA. Citation of the source is appreciated. However, this publication may not be reproduced or distributed for a fee without the specific,written authorization of the Officeof Communications, SAMHSA, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

1

mailto:[email protected]

Data Citation Data users agree to reference the following citation in any of the publications that use these public use data. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS): 2013. Data on Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities. Behavioral Health Services Information System, Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2015. Authors of publications that use these data are required to send citations of their published works to SAMHSA for inclusion in a database of related publications ([email protected]) Disclaimer Data users acknowledge that SAMHSA and SMDI (Synectics) will bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.

Violations If SAMHSA or SMDI determines that this “Terms of Use” agreement has been violated, then possible sanctions could include:

• Report of the violation to the Research Integrity Officer, Institutional Review Board, or Human Subjects Review Committee of the user's institution.

• If the confidentiality of human subjects has been violated, then report of the violation may be made to the Federal Office for Human Research Protections.

• Report of the violation of federal law to the United States Attorney General for possible prosecution.

• Court awarded payments of damages to any individual(s)/organization(s) harmed by the breach of confidential data.

2

mailto:[email protected]

DESCRIPTION OF THE NATIONAL SURVEY OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE

TREATMENT SERVICES (N-SSATS)

The 2009 National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), conducted between March and October 2009, with a reference date of March 31, 2009. It is the 32nd in a series of national surveys begun in the 1970s. The surveys were designed to collect data on the location, characteristics, and utilization of alcohol and drug treatment facilities and services throughout the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and other U.S. jurisdictions.1 The Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, plans and directs N-SSATS.

N-SSATS is designed to collect information from all facilities2 in the United States, both public and private, that provide substance abuse treatment. N-SSATS provides the mechanism for quantifying the dynamic character and composition of the U.S. substance abuse treatment delivery system. The objectives of N-SSATS are to collect multi- purpose data that can be used to:

● Assist SAMHSA and State and local governments in assessing the nature and extent of services

provided in State-supported and other substance abuse treatment facilities and in forecasting substance abuse treatment resource requirements

● Update SAMHSA’s Inventory of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (I-SATS), which includes all known drug and alcohol abuse treatment facilities

● Analyze substance abuse treatment services trends and conduct comparative analyses for the nation, regions, and States

● Generate the National Directory of Drug and Alcohol Abuse Treatment Programs, a compen- dium of facilities approved by State substance abuse agencies for the provision of substance abuse treatment

● Update the information in SAMHSA’s Substance Abuse Treatment Facility Locator, a searchable database of facilities approved by State substance abuse agencies for the provision of substance abuse treatment. The Treatment Facility Locator is available on the Internet at:

http://findtreatment.samhsa.gov

1 The jurisdictions include the territory of Guam, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of Palau, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands of the United States.

2 Entities responding to N-SSATS are referred to as “facilities.” A “facility” may be a program-level, clinic-level, or multi-site respondent.

3

http://findtreatment.samhsa.gov/

Data Collection Procedures for the 2009 N-SSATS Field period and reference date

The survey reference date for the 2009 N-SSATS was March 31, 2009. The field period was from March 31, 2009, through October 17, 2009.

Survey universe

The 2009 N-SSATS facility universe included all 16,310 active treatment facilities on SAMHSA’s I-SATS at a point 6 weeks before the survey reference date. It also included 916 facilities that were added by State substance abuse agencies or through annual frame enhancement, or discovered during the first 3 weeks of the survey. Thus, the total survey universe was 17,226 facilities.

Content

The 2009 N-SSATS questionnaire was a 15-page document with 43 numbered questions. Topics included:

● Facility identification information

● Facility operating entity

● Facility focus of activity

● Type of care provided ■ Outpatient treatment services (regular outpatient treatment, intensive outpatient

treatment, day treatment or partial hospitalization, detoxification, methadone/buprenorphine maintenance)

■ Residential (non-hospital) treatment services (long-term—more than 30 days, short-term—30 days or fewer, detoxification)

■ Hospital treatment services (inpatient treatment, inpatient detoxification)

● Services offered (assessment and pre-treatment services, counseling, pharmacotherapies, testing, transitional services, ancillary services)

● Clinical/therapeutic approaches

● Special programs or groups provided for specific client types

● Services provided in sign language or in languages other than English

● Detoxification from alcohol, benzodiazepines, opiates, cocaine, methamphetamines, or other drugs, and routine use of medication during detoxification

● Client outreach (outreach to persons in the community who may need treatment, maintenance of website)

● Licensure, certification, or accreditation agencies or organizations

● Standard operating procedures

● Payment options accepted, including use of sliding fee scale and/or treatment at no charge

● Facility receipt of government funding

4

● Operation of an Opioid Treatment Program (OTP) certified by SAMHSA and offering maintenance and/or detoxification with methadone and/or buprenorphine

● Clients in treatment on March 31, 2009 (total, clients under age 18, clients receiving methadone, clients receiving buprenorphine)

● Annual admissions

● Percentage of clients in treatment on March 31, 2009, for abuse of both alcohol and drugs, alcohol abuse only, and drug abuse only

● Percentage of clients in treatment on March 31, 2009 with diagnosed co-occurring substance abuse and mental health disorders

● Number of beds designated for residential (non-hospital) and hospital inpatient substance abuse treatment on March 31, 2009

Data collection

Two primary data collection modes were employed—a paper questionnaire sent by mail and a secure web-based questionnaire. Respondents could select either method to complete the survey. Six weeks before the survey reference date (March 31, 2009), letters were mailed to all facilities to alert them to expect the survey. The letters also served to update records with new address information received from the U.S. Postal Service. On March 31, 2009, data collection packets (including the questionnaire, SAMHSA cover letter, State-specific letter of endorsement, information on completing the survey on the web, and a sheet of Frequently Asked Questions) were mailed to each facility. During the data collection phase, contract personnel were available to answer facilities’ questions concerning the survey. Web-based support for facilities completing the questionnaire on the web was also available. Four to 5 weeks after the initial questionnaire mailing, thank you/reminder letters were sent to all facilities. Approximately 8 weeks after the initial questionnaire mailing, non- responding facilities were mailed a second questionnaire packet. About 4 to 5 weeks after the second questionnaire mailing, non-respondents received a reminder telephone call. Those facilities that had not responded within 2 to 3 weeks of the reminder call were telephoned and asked to complete the survey by computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI).

Facility status and response rate

Table 1.1 presents a summary of response rate information. Questionnaires were mailed to a total of 17,226 facilities believed to be actively providing substance abuse treatment services. Of these facilities, 12 percent were found to be ineligible for the survey because they had closed or did not provide substance abuse treatment or detoxification. Of the remaining 15,213 facilities, 14,209 facilities (93.4 percent) completed the survey and 13,513 (88.8 percent) were eligible for inclusion- sion in this data file.

Quality assurance

All mail questionnaires were reviewed manually for consistency and for missing data. Calls were made to facilities to clarify questionable responses and to obtain missing data. If facilities could not be reached during the edit callbacks, responses that were clearly in error were replaced by imputation. After data entry, automated quality assurance reviews were conducted. The reviews

5

Table 1.1 N-SSATS facilities, by status and mode of response: 2009

Number Percent Total facilities in survey 17,226 100.0

Closed/ineligible 2,013 11.7 Eligible 15,213 88.3

Total eligible 15,213 100.0 Non-respondents 1,004 6.6 Respondents 14,209 93.4 Excluded from data file1 365 2.4 Roll-ups2 331 2.2 Included in data file 13,513 88.8

Mode of response 13,513 100.0 Mail 3,887 28.8 Internet 7,802 57.7 Telephone 1,824 13.5

1 Facilities for which client counts were reported by another facility, and no facility information was received from the facility itself.

2 Facilities whose client counts were included in or “rolled into” other facilities’ counts and whose facility characteristics were not reported separately.

SOURCE: Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2009.

incorporated the rules used in manual editing, plus consistency checks and checks for data outliers not readily identified by manual review.

The web questionnaire was programmed to be self-editing; that is, respondents were prompted to complete missing responses and to confirm or correct inconsistent responses.

Item non-response was minimized through careful editing and extensive follow-up. The item response rate for the 2009 N-SSATS averaged 97.8 percent across 193 separate items.

Facility Selection for the 2009 N-SSATS Report and Data File

Table 1.1. The N-SSATS questionnaire serves several purposes, as noted earlier. Three hundred sixty-five of the 14,209 questionnaire respondents provided information but were deemed out of the scope of this data. They were excluded from the analyses presented here. The excluded facilities and reasons for exclusion fell into three categories: ● 216 facilities were halfway houses that did not provide substance abuse treatment. These facili-

ties were included in the survey so that they could be listed in the Directory and the Treatment Facility Locator.

● 117 facilities were solo practitioners. I-SATS and N-SSATS are designed to include facilities rather than individuals. Solo practitioners are listed and surveyed only if the State substance abuse agency explicitly requests that they be included in the survey. The excluded solo practi-

6

Per

cent

of a

ll re

spon

dent

s

tioners had not been identified for inclusion by the State substance abuse agency.

● 32 facilities were jails, prisons, or other organizations that treated incarcerated clients exclusively.

An additional 331 facilities whose client counts were included in or “rolled into” other facilities’ counts and whose facility characteristics were not reported separately were excluded from facility counts in this data. However, their client counts are included.

After the exclusion of 365 out-of-scope facilities and 331 rolled-up facilities, 13,513 eligible respondent facilities were included in the 2009 N-SSATS report and data.

Number of respondents reporting facility and client data

There were 13,513 eligible respondents to the 2009 N-SSATS. The breakdown of facility data and client counts reported by these respondents is summarized below. ● 12,058 facilities reported facility data and client counts for their own organizations.

● 560 facilities reported facility characteristics for themselves and provided client counts for their own facility and for 1,685 other facilities.

● 895 facilities reported facility characteristics only. Their client counts were reported by another facility.

Survey Response Mode

Figure 1. The proportion of facilities using the web survey to respond to N-SSATS has increased steadily since introduction of the option in 2002. The percentage of facilities responding via the web increased from 33 percent in 2005 to 58 percent in 2009. Mail response declined from 45 percent

Figure 1 Survey Response Mode: 2005-2009

100

80

60

40

20

0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Telephone Mail Web

SOURCE: Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2005-2009.

7

have not responded by mail or web, also declined, from 22 percent in 2005 to 13 percent in 2009.

Data Considerations and Limitations

As with any data collection effort, certain procedural considerations and data limitations must be taken into account when interpreting data from the 2009 N-SSATS. Some general issues are listed below. Considerations and limitations of specific data items are discussed where the data are presented. ● N-SSATS attempts to obtain responses from all known treatment facilities, but it is a voluntary

survey. There was no adjustment for the 6.6 percent facility non-response. ● N-SSATS is a point-prevalence survey. It provides information on the substance abuse treat-

ment system and its clients on the reference date. Client counts reported here do not represent annual totals. Rather, N-SSATS provides a “snapshot” of substance abuse treatment facilities and clients on an average day.

● Multiple responses were allowed for certain variables (e.g., services provided and specialized programs). Tabulations of these variables include the total number of facilities reporting each response.

Terminology

● Facility operation indicates the type of entity responsible for the operation of the facility:

■ Private for-profit ■ Private non-profit ■ Government

– Local, county, or community – State – Federal (Dept. of Veterans Affairs, Dept. of Defense, Indian Health Service, other) – Tribal

● Primary focus indicates the services the facility primarily provides:

■ Substance abuse treatment services ■ Mental health services ■ A mix of substance abuse treatment and mental heath services ■ General health care ■ Other

● Clients in treatment were defined as:

■ Hospital inpatient and residential (non-hospital) clients receiving substance abuse services at the facility on March 31, 2009

and

■ Outpatient clients who were seen at the facility for a substance abuse treatment or detoxification service at least once during the month of March 2009, and who were still enrolled in treatment on March 31, 2009

8

N-SSATS BACKGROUND Survey History

N-SSATS has evolved from national survey efforts begun in the 1970s by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) to measure the scope and use of drug abuse treatment services in the United States. The sixth of these surveys, conducted in 1976, introduced the data elements and format that have formed the core of subsequent surveys. These include organizational focus, service orienta- tion, services available, clients in treatment by type of care, and inpatient/residential capacity. The 1976 survey, called the National Drug Abuse Treatment Utilization Survey, was repeated in 1977 and 1978.

In 1979, the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) became a cosponsor of the survey, alcoholism treatment facilities were added, and the study was renamed the National Drug and Alcoholism Treatment Utilization Survey. This survey was repeated in 1980 and 1982. In 1984, a one-page version called the National Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Program Inventory was used. In 1987, the full version of the survey was reinstated and renamed the National Drug and Al- coholism Treatment Unit Survey (NDATUS). NDATUS was conducted annually from 1989 to 1993.

In 1992, with the creation of SAMHSA, responsibility for conducting the survey shifted to SAMHSA’s Office of Applied Studies. The survey was redesigned, and it was conducted annually as the Uniform Facility Data Set (UFDS) survey from 1995 to 1998. During these years, the survey was conducted by mail with telephone follow-up of non-respondents. The 1999 survey year was a transition year during which the survey was redesigned, and an abbreviated telephone survey of treatment facilities was conducted. In 2000, a redesigned full mail survey was reinstated with telephone follow-up; it was renamed the National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS). The reference date for the annual survey had always been the end of September or beginning of October. After the 2000 survey, the reference date was changed to the end of March, and no survey was conducted during 2001.

In 2000, the use of an Internet-based questionnaire was tested, and beginning in 2002, all facilities were offered the opportunity to respond via the Internet.

N-SSATS in the Context of the Drug and Alcohol Services Information System (DASIS)

N-SSATS is one of the three components of SAMHSA’s Drug and Alcohol Services Information System (DASIS). The core of DASIS is the Inventory of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (I-SATS), a continuously updated, comprehensive listing of all known substance abuse treatment facilities. The other components of DASIS are N-SSATS and the Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS), a client-level database of admissions to substance abuse treatment. Together, the components provide national- and State-level information on the numbers and characteristics of individuals admitted to alcohol and drug treatment programs and describe the facilities that deliver care to those individuals.

9

I-SATS is the list frame for N-SSATS. Facilities in I-SATS fall into two general categories and are distinguished by the relationship of the facility to its State substance abuse agency. These categories are described below.

Treatment facilities approved by State substance abuse agencies

The largest group of facilities (13,667 in 2009) includes facilities that are licensed, certified, or otherwise approved by the State substance abuse agency to provide substance abuse treatment. State DASIS representatives maintain this segment of I-SATS by reporting new facilities, closures, and address changes to SAMHSA. Some facilities are not licensed, certified, or otherwise approved by the State agency. Some private for-profit facilities fall into this category. The approved facility group also includes programs operated by Federal agencies, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), the Department of Defense, and the Indian Health Service. I-SATS records for Federally operated facilities are updated annually through lists provided by these agencies.

Treatment facilities not approved by State substance abuse agencies

This group of facilities (3,559 in 2009) represents the SAMHSA effort since the mid-1990s to make I-SATS as comprehensive as possible by including treatment facilities that State substance abuse agencies, for a variety of reasons, do not fund, license, or certify. Many of these facilities are private for-profit, small group practices, or hospital-based programs. Most of them are identified through periodic screening of alternative source databases. (See Special efforts to improve survey coverage below.) State substance abuse agencies are given the opportunity to review these facilities and to add them to the State agency-approved list, if appropriate.

Survey Coverage

The use of I-SATS as the list frame for N-SSATS imposes certain constraints related to the unit of response and the scope of facilities included. In addition, the expansion of I-SATS in recent years to provide a more complete enumeration of substance abuse treatment facilities means that year-to-year comparisons of the numbers of facilities reporting to N-SSATS must be interpreted with caution.

Unit of response

N-SSATS is designed to collect data from each physical location where treatment services are provided. Accordingly, SAMHSA requests that State substance abuse agencies use the point of delivery of service (i.e., physical location) as the defining factor for a facility. It also requests that facilities be included in I-SATS, N-SSATS, and TEDS at the same administrative level so that record linkage among the three data sets is valid. Because of the different State administrative systems, however, there are some inconsistencies in implementation. For example, in some States, multiple treatment programs (e.g., detoxification, residential, and outpatient) at the same address and under the same management have separate State licenses. These are treated as separate by the State substance abuse agency, and are given separate I-SATS ID numbers. In other States, multiple sites are included as a single entity under a parent or administrative unit. In many of these cases, individual sites can report services data in N-SSATS, but client data are available only at a higher administrative level. Beginning in 1995, efforts have been made to identify facility networks and to eliminate duplicate reporting by networks. For most facilities, reporting level remains consistent from year to year.

10

However, beginning in 1998, an emphasis was placed on collecting minimum information from all physical locations, and this has resulted in an increase in the number of facilities.

Special efforts to improve survey coverage

The great majority of treatment facilities in I-SATS are administratively monitored by State substance abuse agencies. Therefore, the scope of facilities included in I-SATS is affected by differences in State systems of licensure, certification, accreditation, and the disbursement of public funds. For example, some State substance abuse agencies regulate private facilities and individual practitioners while others do not. In some States, hospital-based substance abuse treatment facilities are not licensed through the State substance abuse agency.

To address these differences, SAMHSA conducted a large-scale effort during 1995 and 1996 to identify substance abuse treatment facilities that, for a variety of reasons, were not on I-SATS. Some 15 source lists were considered, and facilities not on I-SATS were contacted to ascer- tain whether they provided substance abuse treatment. As expected, this yielded a number of hospital-based and small private facilities that were not on I-SATS. (These facilities were surveyed in 1995 and 1996, but they were not included in the published results of the survey until 1997.) Analysis of the results of this effort led to similar but more targeted updates before subsequent surveys. Potential new facilities are identified using data from the American Busi- ness Index, the annual American Hospital Association survey, and SAMHSA’s biannual Inventory of Mental Health Organizations, the source lists that yielded the most new facilities in 1995 and 1996. Survey participants, who are asked to report all of the treatment facilities in their administrative networks, also identify additional facilities during the survey itself. All newly identified facilities are initially included as not approved by the State substance abuse agency. State substance abuse agencies are given the opportunity to review these facilities and to add them to the State agency- approved list, if appropriate.

Expansion of survey coverage to include all sites within networks at which treatment was provided yielded a net increase of about 2,600 facilities between 1997 and 1998. These additions were not necessarily new facilities, but were facilities not previously included in the survey as separate sites. The number of facilities reporting continued to increase in 1999, but at a slower pace, a net increase of 1,800 facilities. The increase between 1998 and 1999 was in large part because of the improved survey response rate (95 percent in 1999 vs. 90 percent in 1998). Between 2005 and 2009, the number of facilities remained constant, at between 13,350 and 13,800. The total number is decep- tive, however. There was significant turnover as facilities closed and others opened.

Data collection

Until 1996, State substance abuse agencies distributed and collected the facility survey forms. Begin- ning in 1996, data collection was centralized; since that time, SAMHSA has mailed survey forms directly to and collected forms directly from the facilities, and has conducted follow-up telephone interviews with the facility director or his/her designee.

Non-response

Beginning in 1992, SAMHSA expanded efforts to obtain information from non-responding facilities. A representative sample of non-respondents was contacted and administered an abbreviated

11

version of the survey instrument via telephone. In 1993 and later years, this effort was extended to all non-responding facilities. In 1997, a series of measures was introduced to enhance the survey response rate. These included advance notification and improved methods for updating address and contact information. Between 2004 and 2009, use of these methods and intensive telephone follow-up resulted in an annual follow-up rate (i.e., facilities in the sample either completed the survey or were determined to be closed or otherwise ineligible) of 94 to 96 percent. In 2009, the follow-up rate was 94.2 percent.

Exclusions

In 1997, facilities offering only DUI/DWI programs were excluded; these facilities were reinstated in 1998.

Facilities operated by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) were excluded from the 1997 survey and subsequent surveys because SAMHSA conducted a separate survey of correctional facilities.3

During that survey, it was discovered that jails, prisons, and other organizations treating incarcerated persons only were poorly enumerated on I-SATS. Beginning in 1999, these facilities were identified during the survey and excluded from analyses and public-use data files.

I-SATS and N-SSATS are designed to include specialty substance abuse treatment facilities rather than individuals. Solo practitioners are listed on I-SATS and surveyed in N-SSATS only if the State substance abuse agency explicitly requests that they be included.

Beginning in 2000, halfway houses that did not provide substance abuse treatment were included on I-SATS and in N-SSATS so that they could be listed in the National Directory of Drug and Alcohol Abuse Treatment Programs and on the Treatment Facility Locator (http:/findtreatment.samhsa.gov). These facilities are excluded from analyses and public-use data files.

Changes in Survey Content

Since 1992, SAMHSA has made adjustments each year to the survey design, both to minimize non-response and to include areas of emerging interest. For example, questions on the number of clients in treatment receiving buprenorphine were added in 2004. Questions about clinical/therapeutic methods, standard practices, and Access to Recovery grants were added in 2007.

There have also been changes within content areas. For example, in response to concerns about over-reporting of programs or groups for specific client types, the survey question was revised in 2003 to distinguish between those facilities that accepted specific client types and those facilities that offered specially designed programs or groups for that client type. As a result, the number and proportion of facilities offering programs or groups for each of the specified client types decreased. Surveys from 2003 and later are believed to more accurately represent the number and proportions of facilities providing programs or groups for the specified client types.

3 SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies. Substance Abuse Treatment in Adult and Juvenile Correctional Facilities: Findings from the Uniform Facility Data Set 1997 Survey of Correctional Facilities. Drug and Alcohol Services Information System Series: S-9. DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 00-3380. Rockville, MD, 2000.

12

FREQUENCIES

13

CASEID: CASE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER

Program generated case (record) identifier.

Variable type: Numeric

14

STATE: State abbreviationsSTATE: State abbreviations

Value LabelUnweighted

Frequency %

AK Alaska 80 0.6%

AL Alabama 135 1.0%

AR Arkansas 55 0.4%

AZ Arizona 222 1.6%

CA California 1,738 12.9%

CO Colorado 413 3.1%

CT Connecticut 199 1.5%

DC District of Columbia 39 0.3%

DE Delaware 40 0.3%

FL Florida 625 4.6%

GA Georgia 257 1.9%

GU Guam 2 0.0%

HI Hawaii 123 0.9%

IA Iowa 112 0.8%

ID Idaho 66 0.5%

IL Illinois 615 4.6%

IN Indiana 298 2.2%

KS Kansas 201 1.5%

KY Kentucky 294 2.2%

LA Louisiana 163 1.2%

MA Massachusetts 313 2.3%

MD Maryland 343 2.5%

ME Maine 164 1.2%

MI Michigan 490 3.6%

MN Minnesota 298 2.2%

MO Missouri 249 1.8%

MS Mississippi 103 0.8%

MT Montana 60 0.4%

NC North Carolina 413 3.1%

ND North Dakota 59 0.4%

NE Nebraska 114 0.8%

NH New Hampshire 58 0.4%

NJ New Jersey 340 2.5%

NM New Mexico 145 1.1%

NV Nevada 85 0.6%

NY New York 963 7.1%

OH Ohio 393 2.9%

OK Oklahoma 199 1.5%

OR Oregon 245 1.8%

15

STATE: State abbreviations


Frequency %

PA Pennsylvania 533 3.9%

PR Puerto Rico 151 1.1%

PW Rep of Palau 1 0.0%

RI Rhode Island 60 0.4%

SC South Carolina 113 0.8%

SD South Dakota 59 0.4%

TN Tennessee 192 1.4%

TX Texas 459 3.4%

UT Utah 142 1.1%

VA Virginia 219 1.6%

VI Virgin Islands 3 0.0%

VT Vermont 41 0.3%

WA Washington 434 3.2%

WI Wisconsin 255 1.9%

WV West Virginia 83 0.6%

WY Wyoming 57 0.4%

Total 13,513 100%

Variable type: Character

16

DETOX: Offer DetoxDETOX: Offer Detox

1. Which of the following substance abuse services are offered by this facility at this location, that is, thelocation listed on the front cover?

(2) Detoxification


Frequency %

0 No 10,920 80.8%

1 Yes 2,593 19.2%

Total 13,513 100%

• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 1


17

TREATMT: Offer Substance Abuse TreatmentTREATMT: Offer Substance Abuse Treatment

1. Which of the following substance abuse services are offered by this facility at this location, that is, thelocation listed on the front cover?

(3) Substance abuse treatment (services that focus on initiating and maintaining an individual's recovery fromsubstance abuse and on averting relapse)


Frequency %

0 No 194 1.4%

1 Yes 13,319 98.6%

Total 13,513 100%



18

OWNERSHP: OwnershipOWNERSHP: Ownership

5. Is this facility operated by . . .

MARK ONE ONLY

If 1/2, skip to Q.6 or if 3/4/5, skip to Q.8


Frequency %

1 Private-for-profit org 3,959 29.3%

2 Private non-profit org 7,826 57.9%

3 State govt 401 3.0%

4 Local, county, or community govt 795 5.9%

5 Tribal govt 191 1.4%

6 Federal govt 341 2.5%

Total 13,513 100%



19

FEDOWN: Federal Government AgencyFEDOWN: Federal Government Agency

5a. Which Federal Government agency?

MARK ONE ONLY

SKIP TO Q.8


Frequency %

1 Dept of Veterans Affairs 210 1.6%

2 Dept of Defense 91 0.7%

3 Indian Health Service 38 0.3%

4 Other 2 0.0%

. Logical skip 13,172 97.5%

Total 13,513 100%



20

HOSPITAL: Located in/operated by hospitalHOSPITAL: Located in/operated by hospital

9. Is this facility located in, or operated by, a hospital?

If 1, go to Q.9a or if 0, go to Q.10


Frequency %

0 No 11,935 88.3%

1 Yes 1,547 11.4%

.M Missing 31 0.2%

Total 13,513 100%



21

LOCS: Hospital TypeLOCS: Hospital Type

9a. What type of hospital?

MARK ONE ONLY


Frequency %

1 General hospital (incl VA) 1,228 9.1%

2 Psychiatric hospital 277 2.0%

3 Other specialty hospital 40 0.3%


.M Missing 4 0.0%

Total 13,513 100%



22

ASSESSMENT: Number of assessment services offeredASSESSMENT: Number of assessment services offered

The total number of assessment services offered at this facility out of a maximum of 6


Frequency %

0 0 assessment services offered 284 2.1%

1 1 assessment service offered 679 5.0%

2 2 assessment services offered 2,032 15.0%





. Logical skip 14 0.1%

Total 13,513 100%



23

TESTING: Number of testing services offeredTESTING: Number of testing services offered

The total number of testing services offered at this facility out of a maximum of 7


Frequency %

0 0 testing services offered 1,690 12.5%

1 1 testing service offered 2,645 19.6%



4 4 testing services offered 648 4.8%





Total 13,513 100%



24

TRANSITION: Number of transitional services offeredTRANSITION: Number of transitional services offered

The total number of transitional services offered at this facility out of a maximum of 2


Frequency %

0 0 transitional services offered 519 3.8%

1 1 transitional service offered 2,517 18.6%

2 2 transitional services offered 10,461 77.4%


Total 13,513 100%



25

ANCILLARY: Number of ancillary services offeredANCILLARY: Number of ancillary services offered

The total number of ancillary services offered at this facility out of a maximum of 17


Frequency %

0 0 ancillary services offered 135 1.0%

1 1 ancillary service offered 494 3.7%



4 4 ancillary services offered 1,069 7.9%













17 17 ancillary service offered 4 0.0%


Total 13,513 100%



26

SRVC71: Pharmacotherapies NaltrexoneSRVC71: Pharmacotherapies Naltrexone

11. Which of the following services are provided by this facility at this location, that is, the location listed on thefront cover?

MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Pharmacotherapies34. Naltrexone


Frequency %

0 No 11,329 83.8%

1 Yes 2,139 15.8%

.D Don't know 23 0.2%

.M Missing 22 0.2%

Total 13,513 100%



27

SRVC85: Pharmacotherapies MethadoneSRVC85: Pharmacotherapies Methadone


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Pharmacotherapies38. Methadone


Frequency %

0 No 11,982 88.7%

1 Yes 1,521 11.3%


.M Missing 7 0.1%

Total 13,513 100%



28

SRVC87: Pharmacotherapies Buprenorphine with naloxone (Suboxone)SRVC87: Pharmacotherapies Buprenorphine with naloxone (Suboxone)


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Pharmacotherapies40. Buprenorphine-Suboxone®


Frequency %

0 No 11,268 83.4%

1 Yes 2,223 16.5%


.M Missing 7 0.1%

Total 13,513 100%



29

SRVC86: Pharmacotherapies Buprenorphine without naloxone (Subutex)SRVC86: Pharmacotherapies Buprenorphine without naloxone (Subutex)


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Pharmacotherapies39. Buprenorphine-Subutex®


Frequency %

0 No 12,424 91.9%

1 Yes 1,065 7.9%


.M Missing 7 0.1%

Total 13,513 100%



30

OTP: Operate an Opioid Treatment Program (Constructed Variable)OTP: Operate an Opioid Treatment Program (Constructed Variable)

Does this facility operate an Opioid Treatment Program (OTP) at this location?

• Opioid Treatment Programs are certified by SAMHSA’s Center for Substance Abuse Treatment to use opioiddrugs such as methadone in the treatment of opioid (narcotic) addiction.


Frequency %

0 No 4 0.0%

1 Yes 1,239 9.2%


Total 13,513 100%



31

DUI_DWI: Program for DUI/DWI/other offendersDUI_DWI: Program for DUI/DWI/other offenders

19. Does this facility, at this location, offer a specially designed program or group intended exclusively forDUI/DWI or other drunk driver offenders?

If no, skip to Q.20 (BELOW)


Frequency %

0 No 9,653 71.4%

1 Yes 3,847 28.5%


.M Missing 9 0.1%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 13,513 100%



32

ONLYDUI: All Substance Abuse Treatment clients DUI/DWIONLYDUI: All Substance Abuse Treatment clients DUI/DWI

19a. Does this facility serve only DUI/DWI clients?


Frequency %

0 No 3,705 27.4%

1 Yes 127 0.9%


.M Missing 15 0.1%

Total 13,513 100%



33

SIGNLANG: Treatment in sign language-y/nSIGNLANG: Treatment in sign language-y/n

20. Does this facility provide substance abuse treatment services in sign language at this location for thehearing impaired (for example, American Sign Language, Signed English, or Cued Speech)?

• Mark “yes” if either a staff counselor or an on-call interpreter provides this service.


Frequency %

0 No 9,811 72.6%

1 Yes 3,671 27.2%


.M Missing 25 0.2%

.R Refused 2 0.0%

Total 13,513 100%



34

LANG: Treatment in language other than English-y/nLANG: Treatment in language other than English-y/n

21. Does this facility provide substance abuse treatment services in a language other than English at thislocation?

If no, skip to Q.22


Frequency %

0 No 7,676 56.8%

1 Yes 5,828 43.1%


.M Missing 6 0.0%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 13,513 100%



35

LANG16: Do staff counselors provide Substance Abuse Treatment in SpanishLANG16: Do staff counselors provide Substance Abuse Treatment in Spanish

21b. In what other languages do staff counselors at this facility provide substance abuse treatment?

MARK ALL THAT APPLY

17. Spanish


Frequency %

0 No 203 1.5%

1 Yes 3,666 27.1%



.M Missing 31 0.2%

Total 13,513 100%



36

LANG1: Treatment in HopiLANG1: Treatment in Hopi


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

American Indian or Alaska Native:1. Hopi


Frequency %

0 No 3,705 27.4%

1 Yes 12 0.1%



.M Missing 184 1.4%

Total 13,513 100%



37

LANG2: Treatment in LakotaLANG2: Treatment in Lakota


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

American Indian or Alaska Native:2. Lakota


Frequency %

0 No 3,700 27.4%

1 Yes 18 0.1%



.M Missing 183 1.4%

Total 13,513 100%



38

LANG3: Treatment in NavajoLANG3: Treatment in Navajo


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

American Indian or Alaska Native:3. Navajo


Frequency %

0 No 3,667 27.1%

1 Yes 47 0.3%


.M Missing 188 1.4%

Total 13,513 100%



39

LANG4: Treatment in YupikLANG4: Treatment in Yupik


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

American Indian or Alaska Native:4. Yupik


Frequency %

0 No 3,699 27.4%

1 Yes 7 0.1%


.M Missing 196 1.5%

Total 13,513 100%



40

LANG5: Treatment in Other American Indian/Alaska NativeLANG5: Treatment in Other American Indian/Alaska Native


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

American Indian or Alaska Native:5. Other American Indian or Alaska Native language


Frequency %

0 No 3,836 28.4%

1 Yes 66 0.5%


Total 13,513 100%



41

LANG6: Treatment in ArabicLANG6: Treatment in Arabic


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:6. Arabic


Frequency %

0 No 3,635 26.9%

1 Yes 84 0.6%


.M Missing 183 1.4%

Total 13,513 100%



42

LANG7: Treatment in ChineseLANG7: Treatment in Chinese


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:7. Any Chinese language


Frequency %

0 No 3,618 26.8%

1 Yes 101 0.7%


.M Missing 183 1.4%

Total 13,513 100%



43

LANG8: Treatment in CreoleLANG8: Treatment in Creole


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:8. Creole


Frequency %

0 No 3,611 26.7%

1 Yes 110 0.8%


.M Missing 181 1.3%

Total 13,513 100%



44

LANG9: Treatment in FrenchLANG9: Treatment in French


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:9. French


Frequency %

0 No 3,520 26.0%

1 Yes 207 1.5%


.M Missing 175 1.3%

Total 13,513 100%



45

LANG10: Treatment in GermanLANG10: Treatment in German


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:10. German


Frequency %

0 No 3,619 26.8%

1 Yes 104 0.8%


.M Missing 179 1.3%

Total 13,513 100%



46

LANG11: Treatment in HmongLANG11: Treatment in Hmong


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:11. Hmong


Frequency %

0 No 3,671 27.2%

1 Yes 46 0.3%


.M Missing 185 1.4%

Total 13,513 100%



47

LANG19: Treatment in ItalianLANG19: Treatment in Italian


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:12. Italian


Frequency %

0 No 3,412 25.2%

1 Yes 88 0.7%


.M Missing 402 3.0%

Total 13,513 100%



48

LANG12: Treatment in KoreanLANG12: Treatment in Korean


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:13. Korean


Frequency %

0 No 3,649 27.0%

1 Yes 60 0.4%


.M Missing 193 1.4%

Total 13,513 100%



49

LANG13: Treatment in PolishLANG13: Treatment in Polish


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:14. Polish


Frequency %

0 No 3,585 26.5%

1 Yes 135 1.0%


.M Missing 182 1.3%

Total 13,513 100%



50

LANG14: Treatment in PortugueseLANG14: Treatment in Portuguese


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:15. Portuguese


Frequency %

0 No 3,590 26.6%

1 Yes 121 0.9%


.M Missing 191 1.4%

Total 13,513 100%



51

LANG15: Treatment in RussianLANG15: Treatment in Russian


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:16. Russian


Frequency %

0 No 3,531 26.1%

1 Yes 191 1.4%


.M Missing 180 1.3%

Total 13,513 100%



52

LANG20: Treatment in TagalogLANG20: Treatment in Tagalog


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:18. Tagalog


Frequency %

0 No 3,393 25.1%

1 Yes 91 0.7%


.M Missing 418 3.1%

Total 13,513 100%



53

LANG17: Treatment in VietnameseLANG17: Treatment in Vietnamese


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:19. Vietnamese


Frequency %

0 No 3,635 26.9%

1 Yes 83 0.6%


.M Missing 184 1.4%

Total 13,513 100%



54

LANG18: Treatment in other languageLANG18: Treatment in other language


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Other Languages:20. Any other language


Frequency %

0 No 3,720 27.5%

1 Yes 182 1.3%


Total 13,513 100%



55

SRVC76: Adolescents served by this facilitySRVC76: Adolescents served by this facility

22. Indicate the types of clients accepted into treatment at this location.

Type of Client1. Adolescents


Frequency %

0 No 7,013 51.9%

1 Yes 6,457 47.8%


.M Missing 41 0.3%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 13,513 100%



56

SRVC83: Adult women served by this facilitySRVC83: Adult women served by this facility


Type of Client7. Adult women


Frequency %

0 No 1,724 12.8%

1 Yes 11,750 87.0%

.M Missing 38 0.3%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 13,513 100%



57

SRVC84: Adult men served by this facilitySRVC84: Adult men served by this facility


Type of Client9. Adult men


Frequency %

0 No 1,773 13.1%

1 Yes 11,709 86.6%

.M Missing 30 0.2%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 13,513 100%



58

SRVC33: Specific Program/group for pregnant/postpartum womenSRVC33: Specific Program/group for pregnant/postpartum women

22. Indicate whether this facility offers a specially designed substance abuse treatment program or groupexclusively for that type of client at this location.

Type of Client8. Pregnant or postpartum women


Frequency %

0 No 9,499 70.3%

1 Yes 1,717 12.7%


.M Missing 109 0.8%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

.X Multiple responses 1 0.0%

Total 13,513 100%



59

SRVC63: Specific Program/group for seniorsSRVC63: Specific Program/group for seniors


Type of Client6. Seniors or older adults


Frequency %

0 No 11,081 82.0%

1 Yes 842 6.2%


.M Missing 146 1.1%

.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 13,513 100%



60

SRVC62: Specific Program/group for gays/lesbiansSRVC62: Specific Program/group for gays/lesbians


Type of Client5. Gays or lesbians


Frequency %

0 No 12,308 91.1%

1 Yes 699 5.2%



.M Missing 137 1.0%

.R Refused 1 0.0%


Total 13,513 100%



61

SRVC61: Specific Program/group for criminal justice clientsSRVC61: Specific Program/group for criminal justice clients


Type of Client3. Criminal justice clients (other than DUI/DWI)


Frequency %

0 No 8,598 63.6%

1 Yes 3,515 26.0%


.M Missing 120 0.9%

.R Refused 1 0.0%


Total 13,513 100%



62

SRVC31: Specific Program/group for co-occurringSRVC31: Specific Program/group for co-occurring


Type of Client2. Clients with co-occurring mental and substance abuse disorders


Frequency %

0 No 7,663 56.7%

1 Yes 4,855 35.9%



.M Missing 125 0.9%


Total 13,513 100%



63

SRVC32: Specific Program/group for persons with HIV/AIDSSRVC32: Specific Program/group for persons with HIV/AIDS


Type of Client4. Persons with HIV or AIDS


Frequency %

0 No 11,610 85.9%

1 Yes 1,182 8.7%



.M Missing 119 0.9%

.R Refused 1 0.0%


Total 13,513 100%



64

CTYPE4: Hospital Inpatient Substance Abuse care offered currentlyCTYPE4: Hospital Inpatient Substance Abuse care offered currently

23. Does this facility offer HOSPITAL INPATIENT substance abuse services at this location, that is, the locationlisted on the front cover?

If No, SKIP TO Q.24 (BELOW)


Frequency %

0 No 12,716 94.1%

1 Yes 797 5.9%

Total 13,513 100%



65

CTYPEHI1: Hospital Inpatient Detoxification care offeredCTYPEHI1: Hospital Inpatient Detoxification care offered

23a. Which of the following HOSPITAL INPATIENT services are offered by this facility?

MARK “YES” OR “NO” FOR EACH

1. Hospital inpatient detoxification (Similar to ASAM Levels IV-D and III.7-D, medically managed or monitoredinpatient detoxification)


Frequency %

0 No 84 0.6%

1 Yes 713 5.3%


Total 13,513 100%



66

CTYPEHI2: Hospital Inpatient Treatment care offeredCTYPEHI2: Hospital Inpatient Treatment care offered

23a. Which of the following HOSPITAL INPATIENT services are offered at this facility?


2. Hospital inpatient treatment (Similar to ASAM Levels IV and III.7, medically managed or monitored intensiveinpatient treatment)


Frequency %

0 No 241 1.8%

1 Yes 555 4.1%



Total 13,513 100%



67

CTYPE7: Non-hospital Residential Substance Abuse care offered currentlyCTYPE7: Non-hospital Residential Substance Abuse care offered currently

24. Does this facility offer RESIDENTIAL (non-hospital) substance abuse services at this location, that is, thelocation listed on the front cover?

If No, SKIP TO Q.25 (PAGE 7)


Frequency %

0 No 9,993 74.0%

1 Yes 3,520 26.0%

Total 13,513 100%



68

CTYPERC1: Non-hospital Residential Detoxification care offeredCTYPERC1: Non-hospital Residential Detoxification care offered

24a. Which of the following RESIDENTIAL services are offered by this facility?


1. Residential detoxification (Similar to ASAM Level III.2-D, clinically managed residential detoxification or socialdetoxification)


Frequency %

0 No 2,641 19.5%

1 Yes 879 6.5%


Total 13,513 100%



69

CTYPERC3: Non-hospital Residential Short Term Treatment offeredCTYPERC3: Non-hospital Residential Short Term Treatment offered



2. Residential short-term treatment (Similar to ASAM Level III.5, clinically managed high-intensity residentialtreatment, typically 30 days or less)


Frequency %

0 No 1,849 13.7%

1 Yes 1,671 12.4%


Total 13,513 100%



70

CTYPERC4: Non-hospital Residential Long Term Treatment offeredCTYPERC4: Non-hospital Residential Long Term Treatment offered



3. Residential long-term treatment (Similar to ASAM Levels III.3 and III.1, clinically managed medium- orlow-intensity residential treatment, typically more than 30 days)


Frequency %

0 No 658 4.9%

1 Yes 2,861 21.2%



Total 13,513 100%



71

CTYPE1: Any Outpatient Substance Abuse care offered currentlyCTYPE1: Any Outpatient Substance Abuse care offered currently

25. Does this facility offer OUTPATIENT substance abuse services at this location, that is, the location listed onthe front cover?



Frequency %

0 No 2,608 19.3%

1 Yes 10,905 80.7%

Total 13,513 100%



72

CTYPE6: Outpatient Detox offeredCTYPE6: Outpatient Detox offered

25a. Which of the following OUTPATIENT services are offered by this facility?


1. Outpatient detoxification (Similar to ASAM Levels I-D and II-D, ambulatory detoxification)


Frequency %

0 No 9,607 71.1%

1 Yes 1,296 9.6%



Total 13,513 100%



73

CTYPEML: Outpatient methadone maintenance offeredCTYPEML: Outpatient methadone maintenance offered



2. Outpatient methadone/buprenorphine maintenance (Opioid maintenance therapy)


Frequency %

0 No 9,285 68.7%

1 Yes 1,620 12.0%


Total 13,513 100%



74

CTYPEOP: Day Treatment/partial hospital offeredCTYPEOP: Day Treatment/partial hospital offered



3. Outpatient day treatment or partial hospitalization (Similar to ASAM Level II.5, 20 or more hours per week)


Frequency %

0 No 9,179 67.9%

1 Yes 1,726 12.8%


Total 13,513 100%



75

CTYPE2: Intensive outpatient Treatment offeredCTYPE2: Intensive outpatient Treatment offered



4. Intensive outpatient treatment (Similar to ASAM Level II.1, 9 or more hours per week)


Frequency %

0 No 4,914 36.4%

1 Yes 5,991 44.3%


Total 13,513 100%



76

CTYPE3: Regular outpatient Treatment offeredCTYPE3: Regular outpatient Treatment offered



5. Regular outpatient treatment (Similar to ASAM Level I, outpatient treatment, non-intensive)


Frequency %

0 No 855 6.3%

1 Yes 10,050 74.4%


Total 13,513 100%



77

FEESCALE: Uses sliding fee scaleFEESCALE: Uses sliding fee scale

26. Does this facility use a sliding fee scale?

If No, SKIP TO Q.27


Frequency %

0 No 5,095 37.7%

1 Yes 8,388 62.1%


.M Missing 19 0.1%

.R Refused 1 0.0%


Total 13,513 100%



78

PAYASST: Offers no charge or free TreatmentPAYASST: Offers no charge or free Treatment

27. Does this facility offer treatment at no charge to clients who cannot afford to pay?



Frequency %

0 No 6,498 48.1%

1 Yes 6,974 51.6%


.M Missing 31 0.2%

.R Refused 1 0.0%


Total 13,513 100%



79

EARMARK: Receive any Federal, State, County, or Local FundsEARMARK: Receive any Federal, State, County, or Local Funds

28. Does this facility receive any funding or grants from the Federal Government, or state, county or localgovernments, to support its substance abuse treatment programs?

• Do not include Medicare, Medicaid, or federal military insurance. These forms of client payments are includedin Q.29 on next page.


Frequency %

0 No 5,024 37.2%

1 Yes 8,117 60.1%


.M Missing 16 0.1%


Total 13,513 100%



80

REVCHK3: Free Treatment to all clientsREVCHK3: Free Treatment to all clients

29. Which of the following types of client payments or insurance are accepted by this facility for substanceabuse treatment?

MARK “YES,” “NO,” OR “DON’T KNOW” FOR EACH

1. No payment accepted (free treatment for ALL clients)


Frequency %

0 No 12,965 95.9%

1 Yes 515 3.8%


.M Missing 5 0.0%

.R Refused 2 0.0%

Total 13,513 100%



81

REVCHK1: Accepts cash or self-paymentREVCHK1: Accepts cash or self-payment



2. Cash or self-payment


Frequency %

0 No 1,273 9.4%

1 Yes 12,140 89.8%


.M Missing 5 0.0%

.R Refused 2 0.0%


Total 13,513 100%



82

REVCHK8: Accepts Medicare paymentsREVCHK8: Accepts Medicare payments



3. Medicare


Frequency %

0 No 8,660 64.1%

1 Yes 4,405 32.6%


.M Missing 6 0.0%

.R Refused 2 0.0%


Total 13,513 100%



83

REVCHK5: Accepts Medicaid paymentsREVCHK5: Accepts Medicaid payments



4. Medicaid


Frequency %

0 No 5,915 43.8%

1 Yes 7,266 53.8%


.M Missing 6 0.0%

.R Refused 2 0.0%


Total 13,513 100%



84

REVCHK10: Accepts state financed health insuranceREVCHK10: Accepts state financed health insurance



5. State-financed health insurance plan other than Medicaid


Frequency %

0 No 7,502 55.5%

1 Yes 5,111 37.8%


.M Missing 6 0.0%

.R Refused 2 0.0%


Total 13,513 100%



85

REVCHK15: Accepts Federal military insuranceREVCHK15: Accepts Federal military insurance



6. Federal military insurance as TRICARE or Champ VA


Frequency %

0 No 8,083 59.8%

1 Yes 4,367 32.3%

.D Don't know 1,051 7.8%

.M Missing 9 0.1%

.R Refused 2 0.0%


Total 13,513 100%



86

REVCHK2: Accepts private health insuranceREVCHK2: Accepts private health insurance



7. Private health insurance


Frequency %

0 No 4,766 35.3%

1 Yes 8,447 62.5%


.M Missing 6 0.0%

.R Refused 2 0.0%

Total 13,513 100%



87

T_CLI1: Hospital Inpatient clients, Detox - For OTP facilitiesT_CLI1: Hospital Inpatient clients, Detox - For OTP facilities

31a. On March 31, 2009, how many patients received the following HOSPITAL INPATIENT substance abuseservices at this facility?

• COUNT a patient in one service only, even if the patient received both services.

ENTER A NUMBER FOR EACH (IF NONE, ENTER “0”)



Frequency %

1 0-5 47 3.8%

2 6-10 24 1.9%

3 11-15 23 1.9%

4 16-23 23 1.9%

5 24+ 23 1.9%


Total 1,239 100%



88

T_CLI1: Hospital Inpatient clients, Detox - For DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI1: Hospital Inpatient clients, Detox - For DUI_DWI facilities






Frequency %

1 0-2 24 0.6%

2 3-4 10 0.3%

3 5-7 8 0.2%

4 8-12 7 0.2%

5 13+ 6 0.2%


Total 3,716 100%



89

T_CLI1: Hospital Inpatient clients, Detox - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI1: Hospital Inpatient clients, Detox - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWI facilities






Frequency %

1 0-2 245 2.9%

2 3-4 100 1.2%

3 5-7 81 0.9%

4 8-12 96 1.1%

5 13+ 64 0.7%


Total 8,558 100%



90

T_CLI2: Hospital Inpatient clients, Treatment - For OTP facilitiesT_CLI2: Hospital Inpatient clients, Treatment - For OTP facilities






Frequency %

1 0-5 93 7.5%

2 6-12 10 0.8%

3 13-20 15 1.2%

4 21-40 14 1.1%

5 41+ 8 0.6%


Total 1,239 100%



91

T_CLI2: Hospital Inpatient clients, Treatment - For DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI2: Hospital Inpatient clients, Treatment - For DUI_DWI facilities






Frequency %

1 0-4 32 0.9%

2 5-8 7 0.2%

3 9-13 4 0.1%

4 14-25 7 0.2%

5 26+ 5 0.1%


Total 3,716 100%



92

T_CLI2: Hospital Inpatient clients, Treatment - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWIfacilitiesT_CLI2: Hospital Inpatient clients, Treatment - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWIfacilities






Frequency %

1 0-3 337 3.9%

2 4-8 74 0.9%

3 9-14 50 0.6%

4 15-28 69 0.8%

5 29+ 56 0.7%


Total 8,558 100%



93

T_CLIHI: Total Number of Hospital Inpatients - For OTP facilitiesT_CLIHI: Total Number of Hospital Inpatients - For OTP facilities




HOSPITAL INPATIENT TOTAL BOX


Frequency %

1 0-8 38 3.1%

2 9-15 28 2.3%

3 16-24 25 2.0%

4 25-42 26 2.1%

5 43+ 23 1.9%


Total 1,239 100%



94

T_CLIHI: Total Number of Hospital Inpatients - For DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLIHI: Total Number of Hospital Inpatients - For DUI_DWI facilities






Frequency %

1 0-4 21 0.6%

2 5-8 11 0.3%

3 9-15 5 0.1%

4 16-24 9 0.2%

5 25+ 9 0.2%


Total 3,716 100%



95

T_CLIHI: Total Number of Hospital Inpatients - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWIfacilitiesT_CLIHI: Total Number of Hospital Inpatients - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWIfacilities






Frequency %

1 0-4 201 2.3%

2 5-8 98 1.1%

3 9-14 98 1.1%

4 15-25 91 1.1%

5 26+ 98 1.1%


Total 8,558 100%



96

H_AGE1: Hospital Inpatient Clients Under 18 years oldH_AGE1: Hospital Inpatient Clients Under 18 years old

31b. How many of the patients from the HOSPITAL INPATIENT TOTAL BOX were under the age of 18?


Number under age 18


Frequency %

1 0-2 723 5.4%

2 3-4 6 0.0%

3 5-10 32 0.2%

4 11-17 10 0.1%

5 18+ 10 0.1%


Total 13,513 100%



97

HIMETNUM: Total methadone inpatients - For OTP facilitiesHIMETNUM: Total methadone inpatients - For OTP facilities

31c. How many of the patients from the HOSPITAL INPATIENT TOTAL BOX received:

• Include patients who received these drugs for detoxification or maintenance purposes.

ENTER A NUMBER FOR EACH (IF NONE, ENTER "0")

1. Methadone dispensed at this facility?


Frequency %

1 0-2 72 5.8%

2 3-5 17 1.4%

3 6-8 16 1.3%

4 9-16 17 1.4%

5 17+ 18 1.5%


Total 1,239 100%



98

HIBUPNUM: Total buprenorphine inpatientsHIBUPNUM: Total buprenorphine inpatients

31c. How many of the patients from the HOSPITAL INPATIENT TOTAL BOX received:

• Include patients who received these drugs for detoxification or maintenance purposes.


2. Buprenorphine dispensed or prescribed at this facility?


Frequency %

1 0-2 632 4.7%

2 3 31 0.2%

3 4-5 39 0.3%

4 6-9 40 0.3%

5 10+ 39 0.3%


Total 13,513 100%



99

HIMATNUM: Hospital Inpatient - Total MAT - clients - March 31, 2009HIMATNUM: Hospital Inpatient - Total MAT - clients - March 31, 2009

The total number of clients in hospital inpatient OTP facilities receiving medication-assisted treatment


Frequency %

1 0-3 55 0.4%

2 4-5 18 0.1%

3 6-9 25 0.2%

4 10-18 23 0.2%

5 19+ 19 0.1%


Total 13,513 100%



100

HOSPBED: Total beds designated-hospital inpatientHOSPBED: Total beds designated-hospital inpatient

31d. On March 31, 2009, how many hospital inpatient beds at this facility were specifically designated forsubstance abuse treatment?


Number of beds


Frequency %

1 0-10 391 2.9%

2 11-15 78 0.6%

3 16-20 100 0.7%

4 21-34 107 0.8%

5 35+ 105 0.8%


Total 13,513 100%



101

T_CLI3: Residential clients, detox - For OTP facilitiesT_CLI3: Residential clients, detox - For OTP facilities

32a. On March 31, 2009, how many clients received the following RESIDENTIAL substance abuse services atthis facility?

• COUNT a client in one service only, even if the client received multiple services




Frequency %

1 0-6 91 7.3%

2 7-12 7 0.6%

3 13-20 15 1.2%

4 21-31 4 0.3%

5 32+ 6 0.5%


Total 1,239 100%



102

T_CLI3: Residential clients, detox - For DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI3: Residential clients, detox - For DUI_DWI facilities






Frequency %

1 0-2 257 6.9%

2 3 10 0.3%

3 4-5 15 0.4%

4 6-10 11 0.3%

5 11+ 17 0.5%


Total 3,716 100%



103

T_CLI3: Residential clients, detox - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI3: Residential clients, detox - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWI facilities






Frequency %

1 0-2 2,603 30.4%

2 3-5 109 1.3%

3 6-8 82 1.0%

4 9-15 90 1.1%

5 16+ 83 1.0%


Total 8,558 100%



104

T_CLI9: Residential clients, Short-term detoxification - For OTP facilitiesT_CLI9: Residential clients, Short-term detoxification - For OTP facilities




2. Residential short-term treatment (Similar to ASAM III.5, clinically managed high-intensity residentialtreatment, typically 30 days or less.)


Frequency %

1 0-10 61 4.9%

2 11-17 21 1.7%

3 18-26 12 1.0%

4 27-47 13 1.0%

5 48+ 16 1.3%


Total 1,239 100%



105

T_CLI9: Residential clients, Short-term detoxification - For DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI9: Residential clients, Short-term detoxification - For DUI_DWI facilities






Frequency %

1 0-6 173 4.7%

2 7-11 32 0.9%

3 12-18 38 1.0%

4 19-30 37 1.0%

5 31+ 30 0.8%


Total 3,716 100%



106

T_CLI9: Residential clients, Short-term detoxification - For non-OTP andnon-DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI9: Residential clients, Short-term detoxification - For non-OTP andnon-DUI_DWI facilities






Frequency %

1 0-5 2,173 25.4%

2 6-10 209 2.4%

3 11-16 186 2.2%

4 17-29 203 2.4%

5 30+ 196 2.3%


Total 8,558 100%



107

T_CLI10: Residential clients, Long-term detoxification - For OTP facilitiesT_CLI10: Residential clients, Long-term detoxification - For OTP facilities




3. Residential long-term treatment (Similar to ASAM Levels III.3 and III.1, clinically managed medium- or low-intensity residential treatment, typically more than 30 days)


Frequency %

1 0-8 85 6.9%

2 9-16 10 0.8%

3 17-42 9 0.7%

4 43-68 10 0.8%

5 69+ 9 0.7%


Total 1,239 100%



108

T_CLI10: Residential clients, Long-term detoxification - For DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI10: Residential clients, Long-term detoxification - For DUI_DWI facilities






Frequency %

1 0-7 138 3.7%

2 8-13 36 1.0%

3 14-22 51 1.4%

4 23-42 47 1.3%

5 43+ 38 1.0%


Total 3,716 100%



109

T_CLI10: Residential clients, Long-term detoxification - For non-OTP andnon-DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI10: Residential clients, Long-term detoxification - For non-OTP andnon-DUI_DWI facilities






Frequency %

1 0-8 1,117 13.1%

2 9-14 485 5.7%

3 15-20 419 4.9%

4 21-36 474 5.5%

5 37+ 472 5.5%


Total 8,558 100%



110

T_CLIRC: Total number of residential clients - For OTP facilitiesT_CLIRC: Total number of residential clients - For OTP facilities



Residential total box


Frequency %

1 0-16 36 2.9%

2 15-25 24 1.9%

3 26-40 23 1.9%

4 41-80 23 1.9%

5 81+ 17 1.4%


Total 1,239 100%



111

T_CLIRC: Total number of residential clients - For DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLIRC: Total number of residential clients - For DUI_DWI facilities





Frequency %

1 0-11 66 1.8%

2 12-18 66 1.8%

3 19-29 61 1.6%

4 30-50 61 1.6%

5 51+ 56 1.5%


Total 3,716 100%



112

T_CLIRC: Total number of residential clients - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWIfacilitiesT_CLIRC: Total number of residential clients - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWIfacilities





Frequency %

1 0-10 687 8.0%

2 11-16 648 7.6%

3 17-24 513 6.0%

4 25-40 548 6.4%

5 41+ 571 6.7%


Total 8,558 100%



113

R_AGE1: Residential clients under 18 years oldR_AGE1: Residential clients under 18 years old

32b. How many of the clients from the RESIDENTIAL TOTAL BOX were under the age of 18?


Number under age 18


Frequency %

1 0-5 2,992 22.1%

2 6-10 114 0.8%

3 11-16 108 0.8%

4 17-25 90 0.7%

5 26+ 96 0.7%


Total 13,513 100%



114

RCMETNUM: Total methadone residential - For OTP facilitiesRCMETNUM: Total methadone residential - For OTP facilities

32c. How many of the clients from the RESIDENTIAL TOTAL BOX received:

• Include clients who received these drugs for detoxification or maintenance purposes.




Frequency %

1 0-3 79 6.4%

2 4-6 7 0.6%

3 7-14 12 1.0%

4 15-25 14 1.1%

5 26+ 11 0.9%


Total 1,239 100%



115

RCBUPNUM: Total buprenorphine residentialRCBUPNUM: Total buprenorphine residential

32c. How many of the clients from the RESIDENTIAL TOTAL BOX received:



2. Buprenorphine, dispensed or prescribed at this facility?


Frequency %

1 0-2 3,202 23.7%

3 3-4 93 0.7%

4 5-8 55 0.4%

5 9+ 50 0.4%


Total 13,513 100%



116

RCMATNUM: Residential - Total MAT - clients - March 31, 2009RCMATNUM: Residential - Total MAT - clients - March 31, 2009

The total number of clients in residential OTP facilities receiving medication-assisted treatment


Frequency %

1 0-3 66 0.5%

2 4-7 17 0.1%

3 8-14 14 0.1%

4 15-25 14 0.1%

5 26+ 12 0.1%


Total 13,513 100%



117

RESBED: Total beds designated-residential clientsRESBED: Total beds designated-residential clients

32d. On March 31, 2009, how many residential beds at this facility were specifically designated for substanceabuse treatment?


Number of beds


Frequency %

1 0-12 855 6.3%

2 13-18 598 4.4%

3 19-27 673 5.0%

4 29-47 618 4.6%

5 48+ 656 4.9%


Total 13,513 100%



118

T_CLI7: Outpatient clients, detoxification - For OTP facilitiesT_CLI7: Outpatient clients, detoxification - For OTP facilities

33a. How many clients received each of the following OUTPATIENT substance abuse services at this facilityduring March 2009?

• ONLY INCLUDE clients who received treatment in March AND were still enrolled in treatment on March31,2009.

• COUNT a client in one service only, even if the client received multiple services.




Frequency %

1 0-3 879 70.9%

2 4-5 44 3.6%

3 6-10 61 4.9%

4 11-24 57 4.6%

5 25+ 48 3.9%


Total 1,239 100%



119

T_CLI7: Outpatient clients, detoxification - For DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI7: Outpatient clients, detoxification - For DUI_DWI facilities







Frequency %

1 0-2 3,299 88.8%

2 3-5 24 0.6%

3 6-10 20 0.5%

4 11-20 11 0.3%

5 21+ 15 0.4%


Total 3,716 100%



120

T_CLI7: Outpatient clients, detoxification - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI7: Outpatient clients, detoxification - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWI facilities







Frequency %

1 0-2 5,486 64.1%

2 3-5 64 0.7%

3 6-10 45 0.5%

4 11-20 47 0.5%

5 21+ 43 0.5%


Total 8,558 100%



121

T_CLIML: Outpatient clients, methadone/buprenorphine maintenance - For OTPfacilitiesT_CLIML: Outpatient clients, methadone/buprenorphine maintenance - For OTPfacilities





2. Outpatient methadone/buprenorphine maintenance (Opioid mantenance therapy)


Frequency %

1 0-110 319 25.7%

2 110-190 201 16.2%

3 191-286 175 14.1%

4 287-425 207 16.7%

5 426+ 187 15.1%


Total 1,239 100%



122

T_CLIML: Outpatient clients, methadone/buprenorphine maintenance - ForDUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLIML: Outpatient clients, methadone/buprenorphine maintenance - ForDUI_DWI facilities







Frequency %

1 0-3 3,250 87.5%

2 5-8 29 0.8%

3 9-18 33 0.9%

4 19-35 26 0.7%

5 36+ 31 0.8%


Total 3,716 100%



123

T_CLIML: Outpatient clients, methadone/buprenorphine maintenance - Fornon-OTP and non-DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLIML: Outpatient clients, methadone/buprenorphine maintenance - Fornon-OTP and non-DUI_DWI facilities







Frequency %

1 0-4 5,435 63.5%

2 5-10 68 0.8%

3 11-20 60 0.7%

4 21-43 59 0.7%

5 44+ 63 0.7%


Total 8,558 100%



124

T_CLI8: Outpatient clients, Day treatment/partial hospitalization - For OTP facilitiesT_CLI8: Outpatient clients, Day treatment/partial hospitalization - For OTP facilities







Frequency %

1 0-7 1,047 84.5%

2 8-12 9 0.7%

3 13-20 18 1.5%

4 21-35 8 0.6%

5 36+ 7 0.6%


Total 1,239 100%



125

T_CLI8: Outpatient clients, Day treatment/partial hospitalization - For DUI_DWIfacilitiesT_CLI8: Outpatient clients, Day treatment/partial hospitalization - For DUI_DWIfacilities







Frequency %

1 0-4 3,210 86.4%

2 5-8 30 0.8%

3 9-15 42 1.1%

4 16-30 43 1.2%

5 31+ 44 1.2%


Total 3,716 100%



126

T_CLI8: Outpatient clients, Day treatment/partial hospitalization - For non-OTP andnon-DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI8: Outpatient clients, Day treatment/partial hospitalization - For non-OTP andnon-DUI_DWI facilities







Frequency %

1 0-4 5,125 59.9%

2 5-9 138 1.6%

3 10-15 141 1.6%

4 16-30 147 1.7%

5 31+ 134 1.6%


Total 8,558 100%



127

T_CLI6: Outpatient clients, Intensive - For OTP facilitiesT_CLI6: Outpatient clients, Intensive - For OTP facilities







Frequency %

1 0-10 940 75.9%

2 11-18 38 3.1%

3 19-30 34 2.7%

4 31-55 36 2.9%

5 56+ 41 3.3%


Total 1,239 100%



128

T_CLI6: Outpatient clients, Intensive - For DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI6: Outpatient clients, Intensive - For DUI_DWI facilities







Frequency %

1 0-6 2,051 55.2%

2 7-12 324 8.7%

3 13-22 316 8.5%

4 23-40 323 8.7%

5 41+ 355 9.6%


Total 3,716 100%



129

T_CLI6: Outpatient clients, Intensive - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI6: Outpatient clients, Intensive - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWI facilities







Frequency %

1 0-7 3,587 41.9%

2 8-13 511 6.0%

3 14-21 492 5.7%

4 22-40 557 6.5%

5 41+ 538 6.3%


Total 8,558 100%



130

T_CLI5: Outpatient clients, Regular outpatient care - For OTP facilitiesT_CLI5: Outpatient clients, Regular outpatient care - For OTP facilities







Frequency %

1 0-9 851 68.7%

2 10-28 60 4.8%

3 29-75 64 5.2%

4 76-190 53 4.3%

5 191+ 61 4.9%


Total 1,239 100%



131

T_CLI5: Outpatient clients, Regular outpatient care - For DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI5: Outpatient clients, Regular outpatient care - For DUI_DWI facilities







Frequency %

1 0-15 800 21.5%

2 16-30 564 15.2%

3 31-59 666 17.9%

4 60-111 624 16.8%

5 112+ 715 19.2%


Total 3,716 100%



132

T_CLI5: Outpatient clients, Regular outpatient care - For non-OTP andnon-DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLI5: Outpatient clients, Regular outpatient care - For non-OTP andnon-DUI_DWI facilities







Frequency %

1 0-10 1,934 22.6%

2 11-22 884 10.3%

3 23-43 943 11.0%

4 44-89 984 11.5%

5 90+ 940 11.0%


Total 8,558 100%



133

T_CLIOP: Total number of outpatient clients - For OTP facilitiesT_CLIOP: Total number of outpatient clients - For OTP facilities




OUTPATIENT TOTAL BOX


Frequency %

1 0-121 245 19.8%

2 122-205 212 17.1%

3 206-307 202 16.3%

4 308-450 230 18.6%

5 451+ 200 16.1%


Total 1,239 100%



134

T_CLIOP: Total number of outpatient clients - For DUI_DWI facilitiesT_CLIOP: Total number of outpatient clients - For DUI_DWI facilities






Frequency %

1 0-20 720 19.4%

2 21-40 609 16.4%

3 41-72 630 17.0%

4 73-135 677 18.2%

5 136+ 733 19.7%


Total 3,716 100%



135

T_CLIOP: Total number of outpatient clients - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWIfacilitiesT_CLIOP: Total number of outpatient clients - For non-OTP and non-DUI_DWIfacilities






Frequency %

1 0-13 1,282 15.0%

2 12-28 1,065 12.4%

3 29-52 1,081 12.6%

4 53-103 1,141 13.3%

5 104+ 1,116 13.0%


Total 8,558 100%



136

O_AGE1: Outpatient clients under 18 years oldO_AGE1: Outpatient clients under 18 years old

33b. How many of the clients from the OUTPATIENT TOTAL BOX were under the age of 18?


Number under age 18


Frequency %

1 0-3 7,138 52.8%

2 4-6 683 5.1%

3 7-12 752 5.6%

4 13-25 836 6.2%

5 26+ 734 5.4%


Total 13,513 100%



137

OPMETNUM: Total methadone outpatients - For OTP facilitiesOPMETNUM: Total methadone outpatients - For OTP facilities

33c. How many of the clients from the OUTPATIENT TOTAL BOX received:





Frequency %

1 0-112 292 23.6%

2 113-193 208 16.8%

3 194-289 189 15.3%

4 290-428 209 16.9%

5 429+ 191 15.4%


Total 1,239 100%



138

OPBUPNUM: Total buprenorphine outpatientsOPBUPNUM: Total buprenorphine outpatients

33c. How many of the clients from the OUTPATIENT TOTAL BOX received:



2. Buprenorphine dispensed or prescribed at this facility?


Frequency %

1 0-3 9,414 69.7%

2 4-8 196 1.5%

3 9-15 169 1.3%

4 16-35 194 1.4%

5 36+ 170 1.3%


Total 13,513 100%



139

OPMATNUM: Outpatient - Total MAT - clients - March 31, 2009OPMATNUM: Outpatient - Total MAT - clients - March 31, 2009

The total number of clients in outpatient OTP facilities receiving medication-assisted treatment


Frequency %

1 0-111 276 2.0%

2 112-192 213 1.6%

3 193-290 196 1.5%

4 291-430 213 1.6%

5 431+ 191 1.4%


Total 13,513 100%



140

B_PCT: Percent of clients treated for both alcohol and drug abuseB_PCT: Percent of clients treated for both alcohol and drug abuse

34. Some clients are treated for both alcohol and drug abuse, while others are treated for only alcohol or onlydrug abuse. Approximately what percent of the substance abuse treatment clients enrolled at this facility onMarch 31, 2009, including hospital inpatient, residential, and/or outpatient, were being treated for ...

1. BOTH alcohol and drug abuse


Frequency %

1 0-29 3,263 24.1%

2 30-50 3,174 23.5%

3 51-63 1,256 9.3%

4 64-80 2,378 17.6%

5 81+ 2,416 17.9%


Total 13,513 100%



141

A_PCT: Percent of clients treated for only alcohol abuseA_PCT: Percent of clients treated for only alcohol abuse


2. ONLY alcohol abuse


Frequency %

1 0-10 5,425 40.1%

2 11-20 2,253 16.7%

3 21-25 1,265 9.4%

4 26-40 1,574 11.6%

5 41+ 1,970 14.6%


Total 13,513 100%



142

D_PCT: Percent of clients treated for only drug abuseD_PCT: Percent of clients treated for only drug abuse


3. ONLY drug abuse


Frequency %

1 0-10 5,001 37.0%

2 11-20 2,320 17.2%

3 21-26 1,252 9.3%

4 27-50 2,037 15.1%

5 51+ 1,877 13.9%


Total 13,513 100%



143

LOC5: Setting, halfway houseLOC5: Setting, halfway house

37. Does this facility operate a halfway house or other transitional housing for substance abuse clients at thislocation, that is, the location listed on the front cover?


Frequency %

0 No 12,219 90.4%

1 Yes 1,292 9.6%


.R Refused 1 0.0%

Total 13,513 100%



144

LICEN: Lic/cert/accred by hospital or State authorityLICEN: Lic/cert/accred by hospital or State authority

Does this facility or program have licensing, certification, or accreditation from: state substance abuse agency,state mental health department, state department of health, or hospital licensing authority?


Frequency %

1 Yes 12,338 91.3%

.M Missing 1,175 8.7%

Total 13,513 100%



145

ACCRED: Lic/cert/accred by JCAHO/CARF/NCQA/COAACCRED: Lic/cert/accred by JCAHO/CARF/NCQA/COA

Does this facility or program have licensing, certification, or accreditation from: The Joint Commission, CARF,NCQA, or COA?


Frequency %

1 Yes 5,868 43.4%

.M Missing 7,645 56.6%

Total 13,513 100%



146

SRVC75: Ancillary Residential Beds for childrenSRVC75: Ancillary Residential Beds for children


MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Ancillary Services31. Residential beds for clients’ children


Frequency %

0 No 12,789 94.6%

1 Yes 488 3.6%

.M Missing 236 1.7%

Total 13,513 100%



147

Date post:	06-Aug-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	1 times
Download:	0 times

N Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2009...Percentage of clients in treatment on March 31, 2009,...

Documents