SYK, Chaos and Higher-Spins
Cheng Peng
Brown University
March 27, 2019
Based on: JHEP 1812 (2018) 065, 1812.05106 with Ahn
• Strongly coupled Quantum Mechanics model
• Perturbatively solvable in the large N limit
(Sachdev, Ye, 1993; Parcollet, Georges, 1998; Kitaev 2015,2017, Maldacena, Stanford 2016, Polchinski, Rosenhaus 2016, Jevicki, Suzuki, Yoon 2016, Bagrets, Altland, Kamenev 2017... )
The Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev (SYK) model
The Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev (SYK) model
• Strongly coupled Quantum Mechanics model
• Perturbatively solvable in the large N limit
• 2-point function in the IR , conformal
(Sachdev, Ye, 1993; Parcollet, Georges, 1998; Kitaev 2015,2017, Maldacena, Stanford 2016, Polchinski, Rosenhaus 2016, Jevicki, Suzuki, Yoon 2016, Bagrets, Altland, Kamenev 2017... )
• A tower of higher-spin operators in the IR
The Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev (SYK) model
𝑡1 𝑡3
𝑡4 𝑡2
Charm of the SYK-like models
• New insights into old problems
– Perturbatively solvable
– Holographic
– Chaotic
– Tower of operators
• Question: emergence of higher spin symmetry
Large number of symmetries
Another corner of AdS/CFT correspondence
Tensionless/High energy limit of string theory, a very symmetric phase
• One dimensional case
Charm of the SYK-like models
• New insights into old problems
– Perturbatively solvable
– Holographic
– Chaotic
– A tower of operators
• Question: emergence of higher spin symmetry
Large number of symmetries
Another corner of AdS/CFT correspondence
Tensionless/High energy limit of string theory, a very symmetric phase
• One dimensional case
Charm of the SYK-like models
• New insights into old problems
– Perturbatively solvable
– Holographic
– Chaotic
– A tower of operators
• Question: emergence of higher spin symmetry
Large number of symmetries
Another corner of AdS/CFT correspondence
Tensionless/High energy limit of string theory, a very symmetric phase
• One dimensional case
(CP, 2017)
Higher dimensions
• Why higher dimensions ?
– Sensible notion of spins
– Have better studied higher-spin/string models
– Simplest example is 1+1D
Supersymmetric models
• SUSY is important to reach the SYK-like fix point
• Reduce the number of supersymmetries for flexibility
• Look for connections with other established models
(Murugan,Stanford, Witten, 2017)
An N=(0,2) model
•
Chiral: Fermi:
• , with fixed (but tunable)
IR solution
(CP, 2018)
Range of m
• Convergence of the FT
• In this range the model flows to the SYK-like fixed point
Numerical Confirmation
4-point function
h = h
…
…
• , , , …
= ℎ ℎ
ℎ ℎ
1-ℎ 1-ℎ
ℎ ℎ
1-ℎ 1-ℎ
4-point function
whose eigenvalue x satisfies
=
• , , , …
Solve x=1 to get the spectrum of 𝑂ℎ ,ℎ, spin s = ℎ − ℎ .
ℎ ℎ
ℎ ℎ
1-ℎ 1-ℎ
ℎ ℎ
1-ℎ 1-ℎ
Lightest scalar operators
(Murugan,Stanford, Witten, 2017)
Find λ𝐿 by solving x=1
The Lyapunov exponent
(Kitaev 2015, Maldacena Stanford, 2016) Out-of-Time-Ordered Correlators
𝑧1
𝑧3
𝑧2
𝑧4
The Lyapunov exponent
Two interesting limits
Fix q, check the m dependence of the model
• The Lyapunov exponent for the whole range
Two interesting limits
Two interesting limits
• Lyapunov exponent drops to zero
• “Integrablity” takes over ?
• Large symmetries ?
looking for the smallest g for each m
Lightest operators with spins
• Emergent higher-spin
operators in the two limits!
• Generate large symmetry
nonchaotic
Dispersion relation
• How does the anomalous dimension g depend on spin s ?
Dispersion relation
• How does the anomalous dimension g depend on spin s ?
Relations with Higher-spin theory
• Higher-spin perturbation computation
• Rotating folded closed long string in AdS
logarithmic due to the AdS geometry
(Gaberdiel, CP, Zadeh, 2015)
(Gubser, Klebanov, Polyakov, 2002)
Relations with Higher-spin theory
• Logic reversed
• Regarded as deformation away from higher-spin point
• Consistent with previous results
• A toy model that mimics the process of turning off the string
tension where the tuning is explicit
Comments on the higher-spin limits
• A tower of higher-spin operators, generate a higher-spin-type algebra
for each q, similar to the algebra in higher-spin holography
• The model is not free in this limits. Special property is from some delicate
scaling/screening in the IR dynamics
• Singular: cannot simply plug in , rather take
• The other limit is similar, although not identical
Backup slides
Can we understand the observed
higher-spin symmetry better?
In general hard due to the strong coupling, but…
For a single realization
• It is more convenient to work with a single realization
(although SYK is self-averaging.)
• Structure that is independent of realization
• 𝑄 -cohomological algebra ( 𝑄 2 =0 )
(Ahn, CP, 1812.05106)
For a single realization
• The algebra does not depend on the value of the random
coupling.
• Admits a free field realization
• Strategy: looking for any hint of higher-spin symmetry in
this chiral algebra.
(Witten, 1994)
For a single realization
• At generic parameter m and 𝑞, we do not find any higher-spin subalgebra.
• The higher-spin extension leads to a very larger W-algebra
where “conventional” higher-spin operators mix with (all)
other operators.
• Consistent with the expectation that all of them are lifted away
from the cohomology.
(Ahn, CP, 1812.05106)
The cohomological chiral algebra
• In the special limit
• We do find a conventional higher-spin subalgebra that is
quadratic in the fundamental fields
• We find more…
• A second higher spin subalgebra that is mulitlinear in the
fundamental fields with minimal derivatives
The cohomological chiral algebra
• Actually we find more…
• A second higher-spin subalgebra that is higher order in the
fundamental fields
+…
(Ahn, CP, 1812.05106)
𝑊4𝑣
𝑊3𝑣
𝑊3ℎ 𝑊4
ℎ 𝑇
𝑊22
𝑊21
𝑊4𝑣
𝑊3𝑣
𝑊3ℎ 𝑊4
ℎ 𝑇
+…
…
…
(Ahn, CP, 1812.05106, in progress)
𝑊22
𝑊21
𝑊4𝑣
𝑊3𝑣
𝑊3ℎ 𝑊4
ℎ 𝑇
+…
…
…
(Ahn, CP, 1812.05106, in progress)
The cohomological chiral algebra
• Observe a similar structure as stringy “higher-spin-square”
• Another connection to higher-spin/string theories
(Gaberdiel, Gopakumar 2015)
Comments
• The same special value of the parameter where the IR higher-spin operators appear.
(Higher spin is every where, just need to go to the
• Another realization of higher-spin-square – from a strongly coupled model
(Although our model, and more generally many of the SYK-like
models, are largely generalized free theories.)
– with a free parameter
(The two higher-spin subalgebras are all at =1 with no other
parameter. On the other hand, we do observe q-dependence in the
full higher-spin square.)
• The computation is done at finite N
Thank you !