+ All Categories
Home > Education > N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

Date post: 05-Jul-2015
Category:
Upload: iaps
View: 226 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Talk of the "International Workshop on Paolo Farinella (1953-2000): the Scientists, the man", Pisa, 14-16 June 2010
30

Click here to load reader

Transcript
Page 1: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

Paolo Farinella

Page 2: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

Dynamics and Collisions at Saturn:

Joe Burns, Cornell University14 Giugno 2010

The View fromCassini

Page 3: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

ORIGIN?- Collisions or Nebula?

A

B

C

C D

F

Simple causes of structure

ThicknessResonances and

wavesEdge wiggles

Rubble piles and shapesRing moonsHyperionIapetus

Two new problemsEmbedded moonsCorrugations/collisions

Page 4: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

Collisions flatten the rings until they are only about 10 m thick.

Structure

Page 5: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

Satellite resonancesProduce known gross form.Through waves, drive radial evolution of ring & moons.

Electromagnetic resonancesGenerate waves in faint rings

Page 6: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

• Encke Gap and Keeler Gap in the outer A Ring• Each contains a moon – the only known embedded

moons.– Pan was inferred from wavy edges in 1985, discovered in 1991– Daphnis was discovered in 2005

• Gap edges are sculpted by the embedded moons.

Overview of Rings’ Geography

B Ring A RingCassini Div.

F Ring

Keeler

Encke

Page 7: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

STREAMLINES PAST A MOONwakes

Chaotic zone

Horseshoe orbits

3s

Units are Hill radiis = radial separation

M & D, p. 121PF’s book, too

Page 8: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

Waves Near the Encke Gap

Pan (~15 km, 0.4 g/cm3 opens 320-km gap. Three-body problem!Gap contains variable faint rings; one shares Pan’s orbit.Wavy edges induce wakes.Density/bending waves populate region, transfer anglr. mom.

Page 9: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

4-km moon clears20-40 km gap

Inferred = 0.4 g-cm

PIA06237

PIA06238

Daphnis 0pens Keeler Gap.

Lewis and Stewart, 2005

Page 10: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

Encke Gap Wavy Edges

• Wavy edges persist until next encounter with Pan ( ~ 1000 orbits).

• Immediately after encounter, edges damp as expected, but far downstream, wavelength deviates from 3s, sometimes switches abruptly from sinusoid to “chirp”.

• Widths of Keeler and Encke Gaps consistent with mass ratios.

• Is angular-momentum transfer affected?

Inner Edge

Outer Edge

Synodic Motion

Synodic Motion

Tiscareno et al. 2006

Page 11: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"
Page 12: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

41 x 36 x 20 kmDensity: 0.4 g/cm3

Atlas Pan

~ 15 kmDensity: 0.4 g/cm3

Accretion in the Ring Region

• Ring-moons have low densities, fill their Roche lobes• Dense cores accrete porous mantle until they reach

“Roche critical density” (Charnoz et al. 2007; Porco et al. 2007, Science)

Page 13: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

Equipotential Surfaces: Roche Lobe or Hill Sphere

Page 14: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

Shapes of Solar System Bodies

Page 15: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

Nature, last weekCharnoz et al., Burns, N&V

Saturn’sRing-Moons

Were Atlas -> Janus/Epimetheus born in the rings and driven outwards by ring torques?

Page 16: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

• Hyperion’sbright craters have dark floors

• Very low density (~0.5 g-cm-3)

• Impacts into low-density form shallow craters

• Hyperion does not rotate synchronously but tumbles chaotically

Spongy Tumbling Hyperion

Page 17: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

Shape => 17 hr spin??

Page 18: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

- Propellers-Corrugations in the C ring- Phoebe’s ring and Iapetus

Recent models involving collisions in Saturn’s rings

Page 19: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

A Corrugated Curiosity in Saturn’s C ring

M.M. Hedman, J.A. Burns M.S. TiscarenoDDA Meeting, April 2010

Page 20: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

Images at equinox with different illuminations demonstrate that the periodic brightness variations represent vertical corrugations.

Sunlight Sunlight

The corrugation’s wavelength ranges from 30 to 80 km, and its amplitude is only ~ 10 m.

Page 21: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

The corrugation wavelengths vary smoothly with radius, indicating that the corrugation is a single structure with one cause.

D-ring C-ring

Page 22: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

This structure is not static; its wavelength across the D ring has decreased with time

k = 2π/λ = ( 2.5*10-5 km-1/day) δt

CassiniImages

HST Occultation

Page 23: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

dkdt

d Ý dr

214

J2GMr5

Rs

r

2Model: Tilted ring becomes corrugated and winds up at a rate determined by Saturn’s gravitational field

Page 24: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

We can extrapolate back in time to see when the ring would have been flat (i.e., when k -> 0):

k = 2π/λ = ( 2.5*10-5 km-1/day) δt

Page 25: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

The big question is: What happened in 1983?

Either the rings angular momentum shifted off Saturn’s equatorial plane…

…or Saturn’s internal structure changed and tilted the planet’s equator relative to the rings.

Page 26: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

How much mass is needed to shift the ring’s H by 10-7?

Where A is the corrugation amplitude ~ 10 mr is the ring radius ~ 80,000 kmvring is the orbital speed ~ 24 km/svimpactor is the impactor’s speed ~ 40 km/smring is the ring’s mass ~ 5 x 1017 kg

For this scenario to work, the impacting mass needs to be:

mimpact ~ 3 x 10 10 kg

or, assuming the impactor was a single ice-rich object

rimpactor ~ 250 m

`Ar sini ~

mimpact

mring

v impactor

vring

Page 27: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

This is comparable to the sizes of the fragments of Shoemaker-Levy 9 that hit Jupiter in 1994.

(and perhaps the 2009 impactor)

Showalter: Jupiter’s ring tilted in 1994!!

…maybe it is not so unlikely that a similar-sized impactor hit Saturn 25-30 years ago

Page 28: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"
Page 29: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"
Page 30: N2.Burns "Dynamics and collisions at Saturn"

Thanks


Recommended