Naby Ppt 19 March Seminar

8/19/2019 Naby Ppt 19 March Seminar

1/18

METHODIST GIRL’S P.G. COLLEGE ROORKEE

PRESENTATION

ON

Impact Of Social Networking Sites

in EDUCATION OF YOUTH

PRESENTED BY: NABILA ANSARI

SESSION: 20!"20#

$ET%O&IST 'IRL(S P)') *OLLE'E ROO+EE


2/18

CONTENTS

INTRO&,*TION

RESEAR*% $ET%O&OLO'-

OB.E*TI/ES O T%E ST,&-

NEE& O T%E ST,&-

IN&IN'S

*ON*L,SION 1 S,''ESTIONS

LI$ITATIONS

REEREN*ES


3/18

INTRODUCTION

Social networking sites are we"ase3 ser4ices allowing in3i4i35als to

constr5ct a semi"p5lic or p5lic profile in a o5n3e3 s6stem)

$a7im5m of t8e time social networking sites are 5se3 to comm5nicate wit8people w8o are alrea36 t8eir frien3s or connections in t8e social network

s8aring same min3set or same interests an3 4iews9 3isc5ssions on

3eatale topics9 news articles are most common topics on t8ese SNSs)

SNSs are not onl6 pop5lar for pro4i3ing a platform for c8atting9 s8aring

scraps9 4i3eos9 pict5res etc9 5t also for 3isc5ssing social iss5es)


4/18

T85s9 t8e rapi3 a3option of social network sites 6 6o5t8 in t8e ,nite3 States an3 in

man6 ot8er co5ntries aro5n3 t8e worl3 raises some important 5estions)

;86 3o 6o5t8 flock to t8ese sites< ;8at are t8e6 e7pressing on t8em< %ow 3o t8ese sites fit into t8eir li4es<

;8at are t8e6 learning from t8eir participation<Are t8ese online acti4ities like face"to"face frien3s8ips9 or are t8e6 3ifferent9 or

complementar6<

(Danah Boyd, !!"# P$n%$& and R'$& 3efine social networking as =a set of

people an3 t8e relations8ips etween t8em>)


5/18


6/18

POSITIE IMPACT ;it8 Social Networks t8e6 are ale to comm5nicate wit8 t8eir frien3s w8om are

5nale to meet personall6)

It also 8elps in maintaining etter relations8ip wit8 frien3s)

T8e6 can comm5nicate t8eir t8o5g8ts an3 perceptions o4er 3ifferent topics wit8 a

large no) of 5sers9 an3 raise t8eir 4oice also) It 8elps in creating awareness among t8e mass)

Social Networking we sites 8elp in e35cation 6 allowing st53ents an3 teac8ers in

one platform)

St53ents get closer to art an3 3esign9 an3 are e7pose3 contin5o5sl6 to new i3eas9

gi4en a ig c8ance to fee3 t8eir creati4it6)

St53ents can get 5p"to"3ate an3 recent information from Social $e3ia )


7/18

NEGATIE IMPACT

T8e attention to 3etails9 attention to pron5nciation an3 grammar9 8a4e 3ecline33rasticall69 eca5se most of t8e st53ents 3o not write complete sentence9 5se proper

grammatical met8o3 w8ile writing te7t?message)

St53ents get a33icte3 towar3s Social $e3ia9 instea3 of spen3ing time wit8 famil6 in

leis5re perio3@ t8e6 prefer c8atting wit8 online frien3s an3 5nknown faces)

T8e more time st53ents spen3 on social sites9 t8e less t8e6 spen3 socialiing person)

St53ents w8o spen3 a great 3eal of time on social networking are less ale toeffecti4el6 comm5nicate wit8 person)

T8e6 also spen3 less time wit8 famil6)

T8e st536 re4eals t8at t8e acti4e in4ol4ement of st53ents on social sites w8ile st536

res5lts in re35ction in t8eir foc5s of attention) *onse5entl69 t8eir aca3emic

performances 3ecline) T8e st536 also re4eals t8at t8e 6o5ng 5sers are engage3 in c8atting or s5rfing till

mi3nig8t w8ic8 a3l6 affects t8eir p86sical as well as t8eir mental 8ealt8)

ree3om to post 4iews an3 comments pro4i3es goo3 opport5nities for competitors to

post negati4e comments ao5t ot8er companies)


8/18

TRAP OF SOCIAL NET)ORKING SITES


9/18

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

M$an'n*"Researc8 met8o3olog6 is a wa6 to s6stematicall6 sol4e t8e researc8prolem) It ma6 e 5n3erstoo3 as a science of st536ing 8ow researc8 is 3one

scientificall6)

OB+ECTIES OF THE STUDY

) To assess t8e awareness le4el an3 5sage of 3ifferent social networking

sites among 6o5t8)

2) To assess t8e impact of social networking on t8e e35cation of 6o5t8)

) To e4al5ate t8e e8a4ior of 6o5t8 towar3s social me3ia an3 fin3 o5t t8e

total 8o5rs( of time spen3 6 6o5t8 on !) To fin3 o5t t8e 4ario5s t6pes of social prolems associate3 wit8 social

networking sites

RESEARCH DESIGN D$-/'01'2$ M$1hod


10/18

DATA COLLECTION

&ata is collecte3 t8ro5g8 two so5rces:I. P/'3a/y Da1a " &ata t8at 8as een collecte3 from first 8an3 e7perience is

known as primar6 3ata) Simple ran3om sample tec8ni5e is 5se3 to collect t8e

3ata) T8e primar6 3ata was collecte3 t8ro5g8 5estionnaire met8o3) T8e

5estionnaire was 3istri5te3 among st53ents of $'P)') college9 Roorkee to

otain information for m6 st536)

II. S$onda/y Da1a or t8e p5rpose of m6 st536 3ata 8as een taken from4ario5s secon3ar6 so5rces like newspapers9 internet9 ooks9 magaines9 reports9

p5lications an3 Co5rnals)

. Sa30&$ -'4$5 T8is st536 will co4er t8e responses of D0 respon3ents9 to fin3

o5t t8e impact of social networking among t8e 6o5t8 at $'P)') college of

Roorkee) T8e st53ent will e aske3 to fill t8e 5estionnaire ase3 on t8eirknowle3 e)


11/18

POPULATION5T8e pop5lation of t8e st536 contains 6o5t8 of Roorkee)

SAMPLE FRAME5 T8e st536 3oes not incl53e entire pop5lation eca5se time

re5ire3 is more to fin3 t8e perfect pict5re) T8erefore t8e st536 will s5r4e6 a

partic5lar area t8at is ARTS 1 *O$$ER*E st53ents of $ET%O&IST 'IRLS P)')

*OLLE'E ROOR+EE)

N$$d O6 Th$ S1%dy: As Social Networking is 4er6 pop5lar among t8e 6o5t8 9 sot8at t8e6 contri5te t8e maCorit6 percentage of t8e 5sers of t8e me3ia) So9 I wante3 to

st536 t8e impact of social networking sites on 6o5t8 an3 t8eir e35cation) Se4eral

st53ies re4eal t8at social networking 8a4e ot8 positi4e an3 negati4e impact onst53ents an3 teenagers) Some st536 concl53es t8at most of t8e st53ents 5se social

network C5st to comm5nicate wit8 frien3s an3 it is 3istracting t8em from t8eir st53ies)

T8e Present st536 8elps 5s to i3entif6 w8et8er social me3ia is reall6 3istracting

st53ents from t8eir e35cation or not)


12/18

FINDINGS OF THE STUDY

0F respon3ents 5se internet)

!0F of respon3ents 5se SNSs 5p to 0"28o5rs 3ail6)

D!F respon3ents are 5sing aceook as fa4ro5te form of SNSs)

!F respon3ents agree t8at social networking 8elps to3a6(s 6o5t8 in

e35cation)

G#F respon3ents agree3 t8at social networking acti4ities is a waste of time)

#!F respon3ents agree t8at social networking act negati4el6 in t8e

e35cation of 6o5t8)

GF respon3ents agree t8at social networking is necessar6 for 6o5t8) HGF respon3ents agree t8at 5nwante3 information creates conf5sions in t8e

min3s of 6o5t8)


13/18

G!F respon3ents agree t8at social networking 8as ecome a 8o6 of

6o5t8)

H#F respon3ents agree t8at t8ere is ot8 positi4e as well as negati4e impact

of social networking on 6o5t8)

00F respon3ents agree t8at social networking is 8elpf5l to create

awareness among 6o5t8)

00F respon3ents agree t8at social networking is 8elpf5l to connect wit8ot8er 5sers)

00F respon3ents agree t8at social networking is 8elpf5l to post an

a34ertisement)

2F respon3ents agree t8at social networking is 8elpf5l to searc8 5siness

for 6o5t8)

GGF respon3ents agree t8at irrele4ant an3 anti" religio5s post creates 8atre3

among 6o5t8 of 3ifferent comm5nities)


14/18

Con&%-'on and S%**$-1'on: Social Networking wesites likeTwitter9 aceook9 $6space an3 -o5t5e are ecoming more an3 more

pop5lar an3 eca5se of t8eir attracti4e feat5res9 6o5ng people are attracte3 toSocial Networking sites) T8e St536 re4eals t8at9 aceook is t8e most pop5lar

sites among t8e 6o5t8s@ it pro4i3es in3i4i35als wit8 a wa6 of maintaining an3

Strengt8ening social ties w8ic8 can e eneficial to ot8 social an3 aca3emic

settings)

T8ese same sites 9 8owe4er also ecome essential nee3 to3a69 5t it s8o5l3

not e moti4ate3 at all) It co5l3 r5in t8e f5t5re of teenagers an3 6o5t8 an3 it

8a3 a 4er6 a3 impact on e35cation)

T8ere is no t8ir3 part6 or an6 ot8er comm5nit6 w8ic8 co5l3 c8eck for w8atactions 8as een performe3 6 w8ic8 5ser9 so it is strongl6 recommen3e3 to

c8eck c8il3ren(s acti4ities on social networks an3 3on(t let t8em 5se social

networking wesites) It is also a strong recommen3ation for 'o4t) an3

international c6er C5ris3iction to take part an3 an t8ese t6pes of wesites9 to

sec5re t8e f5t5re of 6o5t8)


15/18

LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

Respon3ents 3on(t 8a4e s5fficient time to fill t8e 5estionnaire eca5se of

time press5re)

T8e s5r4e6 was limite3 to Roorkee area onl6)

Time constraint was anot8er limitation t8at is w86 t8e 5estionnaire was3istri5te3 to #0 st53ents)

Lack of interest s8own 6 respon3ents res5lte3 in incomplete responses)


16/18

REFERENCES• Bo639 &ana8) 200HJ) ;86 -o5t8 %eartJ Social Network Sites: T8e Role of

Networke3 P5lics in Teenage Social Life) $acArt85r o5n3ation Series on

&igital Learning K -o5t89 I3entit69 an3 &igital $e3ia /ol5me e3) &a4i3

B5cking8amJ) *amri3ge9 $A: $IT Press

•

.ain9 $a385r RaC 202J) Impact of Social Networking Sites in t8e *8anging$in3set of -o5t8 on Social Iss5es " A St536 of &el8i"N*R -o5t8)

Researc8ers ;orl3 ".o5rnal of Arts9 Science 1 *ommerce9 ISSN 22"!H29

/ol)K III

• +8an9 S8aa3) Impact of Social Networking ;esites on St53ents Life)

Retrie4e3 2n3 No4emer9 20!)• 8ttp:??Ccmc)in3iana)e35?4ol?iss5e?o63)ellison)8tml Accesse3 on st

er5ar69 202J


17/18

• S) +5pp5swam69 P) B) S8ankar Nara6an9 =T8e Impact of Social Networking ;esites

on t8e E35cation of -o5t8>9 In International .o5rnal of /irt5al *omm5nities an3

Social Networking9 /ol) 29 Iss5e 9 page #H"H9 .an5ar6"$arc8 200)

• T8iagaraCan9 Balas5ramanian 1 +ot8an3araman9 Srikamaks8i 202J) Role of

Social Networking Sites in Teac8ing) Otolar6ngolog6 Online .o5rnal9 ISSN: 22D0"

0D9 "H)


18/18

....THANKYOU

Date post:	07-Jul-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	naby-ansari
View:	220 times
Download:	0 times

Naby Ppt 19 March Seminar

Documents