+ All Categories
Home > Documents > NAHBA CONFERENCE 2006

NAHBA CONFERENCE 2006

Date post: 13-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: kamana
View: 39 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
NAHBA CONFERENCE 2006. Illegal Sign Removal. What makes a sign illegal. Federal Law Requires the States to create and enforce regulations regarding outdoor advertising device control State regulations must implement federal requirements Only a State can violate Federal Law. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
18
NAHBA CONFERENCE 2006 Illegal Sign Removal
Transcript
Page 1: NAHBA CONFERENCE 2006

NAHBA CONFERENCE 2006

Illegal Sign Removal

Page 2: NAHBA CONFERENCE 2006

What makes a sign illegal

Federal Law– Requires the States to create and enforce

regulations regarding outdoor advertising device control

– State regulations must implement federal requirements

– Only a State can violate Federal Law

Page 3: NAHBA CONFERENCE 2006

Identifying Illegal Advertising Devices

Federal Law Requirements– Controlled Route– Inside or Outside Urban Areas– Commercially or Industrially Zoned or Unzoned

Area– Size, lighting and spacing requirements as

established in the state/federal agreement– Message Content

Page 4: NAHBA CONFERENCE 2006

Federal Law Requirements

Must be on a controlled route– Interstate System– Federal Aid Primary as it existed on June 30,

1991– National Highway System– Routes on these systems designated as Scenic

Page 5: NAHBA CONFERENCE 2006

Federal Law Requirements

Inside or Outside Urban Areas (Controlled Areas)– Inside an urban area (as defined by latest

census data), out to 660 feet– Outside an urban area, as far as can be seen

(Includes area within R/W)

Page 6: NAHBA CONFERENCE 2006

Federal Law Requirements

Commercially or Industrially Zoned or Unzoned Commercial or Industrial Area– Unzoned commercial or industrial area is

defined by the state– Cannot not be zoned agricultural, residential,

etc. but used as industrial

Page 7: NAHBA CONFERENCE 2006

Federal Law Requirements

Size, lighting and spacing requirements as established in the state/federal agreement

Page 8: NAHBA CONFERENCE 2006

Federal Law Requirements

Message Content– On premise vs. Off premise– Illegal Activities at the location of the sign– Oregon and California recent case law

Page 9: NAHBA CONFERENCE 2006

Federal Law

Non-conforming Advertising Devices– Non-conforming devices that lose their non-

conforming status become illegal devices – Devices lose their non-conforming status when

they become obsolete, abandoned, or destroyed, except by vandalism or other tortuous acts

Page 10: NAHBA CONFERENCE 2006

What Makes a Sign Illegal

State Law

- State law can be more restricting than federal law

Individual state/federal agreements– Dictates the size, lighting and spacing

requirements– Specifies permitting requirements

Page 11: NAHBA CONFERENCE 2006

How to monitor illegal advertising devices

State permit processes– Differs from state to state– Off premise permits– On premise permits– Keeps record of all the permitted devices within

the states’ jurisdiction

Page 12: NAHBA CONFERENCE 2006

How to monitor illegal advertising devices

Record Keeping of Suspected Illegal Advertising Devices– Observe from the field the controlled routes – Investigate any suspected illegal devices– Pursue and remove any identified illegal

advertising device

Page 13: NAHBA CONFERENCE 2006

How to Remove Illegal Signs

Must bring into compliance with current federal and state requirements.– Receive a permit if eligible– Remove

Page 14: NAHBA CONFERENCE 2006

What’s Working

Education: Nebraska and Montana both educate the districts, businesses and chambers of commerce about their program

Letters: ODOT, Washington, New York, Iowa and South Dakota have seen letters work well.

Verbal Contact: ODOT, Iowa and South Dakota have had success with verbally contacting sign owners.

Courts: ODOT, Washington, West Virginia, South Dakota, New York, Iowa and Maine have utilized the court systems for compliance.

Penalties: Utah

Page 15: NAHBA CONFERENCE 2006

What’s Not Working

Lack of knowledge of program Administration changes Verbal contact Workload, Man/Woman power Lack of DOT priority Poorly Defined statues on on-premise signs Defenses

Page 16: NAHBA CONFERENCE 2006

What’s Not Working

Typical Defenses– Uncontrolled Route– Outside of State’s Jurisdiction– On Premise

Page 17: NAHBA CONFERENCE 2006

On Premise Defense

Page 18: NAHBA CONFERENCE 2006

On Premise Defense


Recommended