Date post: | 08-Apr-2017 |
Category: |
Science |
Upload: | lawrence-berkeley-national-laboratory |
View: | 317 times |
Download: | 2 times |
1 Ivan Khodyuk – SCINT15
Improvement of NaI:Tl light output and energy resolution by co-doping
I.V. Khodyuk, S. Messina, T. Hayden, S.E. Derenzo, E.D. Bourret, G. A. Bizarri
Lawrence Berkeley Na.onal Laboratory, Berkeley, CA -‐ USA
2 Ivan Khodyuk – SCINT15
NaI – Performance Engineering
Factor Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Dopant Tl - - -
[Dopant], % 0.0 0.1 0.25 0.5 Co-dopant Mg Ca Sr Ba [co-dopant] 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 [Eu2+], % 1.0 0.5 0.1 0.0
Sequential trial of different compositions – 256 crystals Design of Experiment using L16 orthogonal array – 16 crystals
Goal: Improvement of NaI Light Output and Energy Resolution by co-doping
Benchmark: NaI:Tl – 44,000 ph/MeV and 6.3% at 662 keV
Factorial (parametric) space to discover:
Best value reported - Shiran et al.: NaI:Tl,Eu – 48,000 ph/MeV and 6.2% at 662 keV
3 Ivan Khodyuk – SCINT15
Design of Experiment
-XRD -OE -XRL -PXR -XRF
Response to Gammas
-PHM
Non-proportionality in house and at the ALS Advanced characterization: -TSL, -OSL, -Afterglow, -ICP/GDMS
Powder chemistry &
melt-mix crystal synthesis
mm-size crystals
processing
Single crystal growth
cm-size crystals processing
Phase I Phase II
Design of Experiment + HTCF
Mul
ti-re
gres
sion
dat
a an
alys
is
Selected samples Hig
h Th
roug
hput
Cha
ract
eriz
atio
n Fa
cilit
y
4 Ivan Khodyuk – SCINT15
Design of Experiment
# [Tl+] Co-d [co-d] [Eu2+] ER,% LO, ph/KeV
0 0.1 - 0.0 0.0 7.0 43
1 0.0 Mg 0.1 1.0 8.5 24.6
2 0.0 Ca 0.2 0.5 6.4 37.3
3 0.0 Sr 0.4 0.1 9.9 14.5
4 0.0 Ba 0.8 0.0 21 5.1
5 0.1 Mg 0.2 0.0 13.4 18.3
6 0.1 Ca 0.1 0.1 6.9 41.6
7 0.1 Sr 0.8 0.5 8 35.5
8 0.1 Ba 0.4 1.0 13.1 4.1
9 0.25 Mg 0.4 0.5 20 12.4
10 0.25 Ca 0.8 1.0 7 33.9
11 0.25 Sr 0.1 0.0 6.1 29.9
12 0.25 Ba 0.2 0.1 5.9 47
13 0.5 Mg 0.8 0.1 17.5 33.4
14 0.5 Ca 0.4 0.0 10.9 22.6
15 0.5 Sr 0.2 1.0 12 23.8
16 0.5 Ba 0.1 0.0 17.5 16.7
Fractional factorial design using L16 orthogonal array
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 160
5
10
15
20
Homemade reference
C ommerc ia l reference
Ene
rgy Res
olution @
662
keV (%)
D es ign number
Mg
C a
S r
B a
B aMg
C a S r
B a
Mg
C a
S r
B aMg
C aS r
S tatis tica l limit for 44000 photons /MeV
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 160
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Homemade reference
Ligh
t Outpu
t (ph
oton
s/ke
V)
D es ign number
Mg
C a
S r
B a
Mg
C a
S r
B a
Mg
C a
B a
S r
Mg
C a
B a
S r
C ommerc ia l reference
5 Ivan Khodyuk – SCINT15
Experimental design output -‐ visualizaAon
Performance (ER) optimization in 4 dimensional parametric space
6 Ivan Khodyuk – SCINT15
OpAmum composiAon synthesis (melt-‐mix)
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 50000
100
200
300
400
Cou
nts
P MT 1 C hanne l
S 4
L Y = 46200 ph/MeV*E R = 5.4%
*LO corrected for PMT QE
Multi-regression analysis
Optimal composition Factor Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
[Tl+] 0.0 0.1 0.25 0.5
Co-dopant Mg Ca Sr Ba
[co-dopant] 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8
[Eu2+] 1.0 0.5 0.1 0
NaI: 0.25%Tl, 0.1%Eu, 0.2%Ca
Quick optimal composition synthesis and performance evaluation
7 Ivan Khodyuk – SCINT15
OpAmum composiAon synthesis (Bridgman)
NaI: 0.25%Tl+, 0.1%Eu2+, 0.2%Ca2+ – nominal concentrations in the melt
Part of boule [Tl+], ppm wt
[Ca2+], ppm wt
[Eu2+], ppm wt
nominal in melt 3470 540 1000 top 14641 580 890 center 1500 490 940 bottom 880 580 940
Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) results:
Conclusions: 1) Significant Tl segregation during the Bridgman growth; 2) Parts of the crystal with lower [Tl+] show better ER and LO
42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 522.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
top center bottom
Ene
rgy Res
olution @
662
keV (%)
L ig ht O utput (photons /keV )
5.2% (51.1ph/keV )
S ta tis tica l limit for 44000 photons /MeV
R eference Na I:T l #0
C ommerc ia l Na I:T l
8 Ivan Khodyuk – SCINT15
NaI:TEC – OpAmum composiAon (Bridgman)
NaI with lower concentration of Tl+ – 0.1 mole % in the melt was grown using same Bridgman furnace
550 600 650 700
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Normalized
cou
nts
G amma energy (keV )
Na I:T l commerc ia l reference -‐ 6.3±0.2% Na I:T l,C a ,E u co-‐doped -‐ 4.9±0.2%
52000 ph/MeV 4.9% at 662keV
NaI:TEC (Tl, Eu, Ca) – with 52,000 ph/MeV and 4.9% resolution at 662 keV
9 Ivan Khodyuk – SCINT15
NaI:Tl vs NaI:TEC characterizaAon (i)
250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650
Na I:T E C Na I:T l re ference
XRL em
ission
intens
ity, a
rb. u
n.
W aveleng th, nm
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Na I:T l re ference Na I:T E C
Cou
nts/bin
T ime (ns )
Na I:T l -‐ 195 nsNa I:T l, E u, C a -‐ 195 ns (20% ) 1790 ns (80% )
X-ray luminescence Scintillation decay time
XRL emission max at 450nm 80% of the light emitted through “long” 1.8µs component
12 Ivan Khodyuk – SCINT15
NaI:Tl vs NaI:TEC characterizaAon (iii)
- Non-proportionality was measured at the ALS (LBNL) using micro-tomography beamline
- Systematic change of Photon-nPR curve at 6-60keV enregy range
Photon non-proportional response
Early stages of scintillation process are affected bythe co-doping of NaI:Tl
NaI:Tl LO 44ph/keV à ER 6.3% NaI:TEC LO 52ph/keV à ER 5.9% à ER 4.9%
13 Ivan Khodyuk – SCINT15
Conclusion
• Design of experiment (fractional factorial design) has been used to speed up discovery of Eu2+ and IIA influence on scintillation performance of NaI:Tl and will be applied to other materials and factors
• Optimal composition – NaI:TEC (0.1%Tl+, 0.1%Eu2+,
0.2%Ca2+) determined with multi-regression analysis gives 52000 photons/MeV and 4.9% grown by Bridgman
• NaI:TEC under X-rays and optical excitation is emitting light predominantly through Eu2++Vac cluster with max at 450nm and main decay component of 1.8µs
14 Ivan Khodyuk – SCINT15
Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank S. Hanrahan, D. Wilson, and Dr. J. Powell for their technical and engineering support and Drs. G. Gundiah, M. Gascon, E. Samulon, D. Perrodin and T. Shalapska for their scientific input. Combinatorial and high throughput material synthesis part of this work was supported by the US Department of Homeland Security/DNDO and crystal growth effort by the US Department of Energy/NNSA/DNN R&D and carried out at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under Contract no. AC02-05CH11231. This work does not constitute an express or implied endorsement on the part of the government.