This is the initially submitted version of the paper ”C. Chen, C. Midelet, S. Bhuckory, N. Hildebrandt, and M. H. V. Werts. Nanosurface Energy Transfer from Long-Lifetime Terbium Donors to Gold Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 17566−17574.” DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539.
1
Nanosurface Energy Transfer from Long-Lifetime Terbium Donors to Gold Nanoparticles
Chi Chen,1+ Clyde Midelet,2+ Shashi Bhuckory,1 Niko Hildebrandt1* and Martinus H. V. Werts2*
1 NanoBioPhotonics (nanofret.com), Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS, CEA, 91400 Orsay, France.
2 Univ Rennes, CNRS, SATIE – UMR8029, École normale supérieure de Rennes, Campus de Ker Lann, F-35170 Bruz, France.
* Corresponding authors: [email protected], [email protected] + These authors contributed equally.
ABSTRACT. Photoluminescence (PL) quenching by gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) is a frequently applied principle in nanobiosensing. The quenching is most often explained in terms of the Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) mechanism, and more rarely in terms of the nanosurface energy transfer (NSET) mechanism. Although both consider non-radiative resonance energy transfer, there are significant differences in predictions of the strength and the distance-dependence of the quenching. Here, we investigate energy transfer to AuNPs from a terbium(III)-complex (Tb) with long (millisecond) PL decay time, with the aim to provide a better understanding of the underlying energy transfer process. The binding of Tb-labeled streptavidin (Tb-sAv) to biotinylated AuNPs (biot-AuNPs) was studied using light scattering spectroscopy. Quenching of the PL of Tb-sAv upon binding to biot-AuNPs of different diameters (5, 30, 50, 80 nm) was studied by time-resolved PL spectroscopy. Energy transfer efficiencies were found to be practically independent of the AuNP size. Analysis according to FRET theory yielded donor-acceptor distances that were inconsistent and far beyond the expected Tb-AuNP distance. In contrast, the NSET model yielded good agreement between the Tb-to-AuNP surface distance estimated from the geometry of the Tb-
This is the initially submitted version of the paper ”C. Chen, C. Midelet, S. Bhuckory, N. Hildebrandt, and M. H. V. Werts. Nanosurface Energy Transfer from Long-Lifetime Terbium Donors to Gold Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 17566−17574.” DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539.
2
sAv/biotin-AuNP assembly (4.5 nm) and those calculated from PL lifetime analysis, which range from 4.0 nm to 6.3 nm. Our findings strongly suggest that NSET (and not FRET) is the operational mechanism in PL quenching by AuNPs, which is important information for the development, characterization and application of nanobiosensors based on PL quenching by AuNPs.
Keywords: FRET, NSET, Au NP, Lanthanide, luminescence, lifetime.
The application of excitation energy transfer has expanded the applicability of luminescent probe
methodologies in biochemistry, clinical diagnostics, and biomolecular imaging.1–3 The
understanding of the energy transfer mechanism between donors and acceptors plays a
fundamental role in developing and optimizing biosensing technologies. Förster resonance energy
transfer (FRET) is the best-known energy transfer mechanism and has been confirmed for pairs of
small donor and acceptor molecules. It predicts the energy transfer efficiency to be inversely
proportional to the sixth power of the distance between the donor and acceptor.4 This energy
transfer occurs at intermolecular distances in the small window between approximately 1 and 20
nm,5 a range that is ideally suited for observing dynamic biomolecular interactions, involving
proteins, nucleic acids, cell membranes, and other biological systems.6 However, many
biomolecular processes take place over longer distances and their dynamic interactions are difficult
to follow by FRET. Thus, investigating and understanding longer-range energy transfer processes
and using them for biosensor development is highly desirable.
Theorized by Persson and Lang,7 nanosurface energy transfer (NSET) has emerged as an energy
transfer mechanism that can measure biomolecular interactions over distances up to 50 nm and
thereby more than double the range of FRET.8 Similar to FRET, NSET is a non-radiative dipole-
dipole energy transfer but in contrast to FRET (in which both donor and acceptor are considered
as point dipoles) the acceptor is a nanometric surface modeled as a collection of many dipoles. In
NSET, the efficiency is inversely proportional to the fourth power of the distance between the
This is the initially submitted version of the paper ”C. Chen, C. Midelet, S. Bhuckory, N. Hildebrandt, and M. H. V. Werts. Nanosurface Energy Transfer from Long-Lifetime Terbium Donors to Gold Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 17566−17574.” DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539.
3
donor and the acceptor surface of a metallic nanoparticle (in most cases AuNPs).9,10 Research
showed that NSET model was in good agreement with the experimental data on small size AuNPs
(below 3 nm) in combination with organic dyes and quantum dots (QDs) as donors.10–12 NSET
behavior with energy transfer efficiencies independent of the NP size or number of donors was
also demonstrated for larger size AuNPs.13–16 However, in other studies reporting about biosensors
that use PL quenching by AuNPs, the underlying energy transfer mechanism is assumed to be
FRET17,18 or is not specified.19,20
Studies of the NSET mechanism have focused on the interaction of AuNPs with organic dyes
and QDs but have as yet not used luminescent lanthanide complexes as the energy donor. Whereas
hybrid nanomaterials incorporating luminescent lanthanide ions and plasmonic AuNPs have been
reported in the literature,21–23 a quantitative experimental study on the applicability of NSET versus
FRET mechanisms in these materials has not been carried out. In comparison to fluorescent
molecular energy transfer donors, lanthanide ions offer some distinctive features such as long
excited-state lifetimes (in the micro- to millisecond range) and multiple narrow emission bands in
the visible region of the spectrum.24 Thus, the investigation of lanthanide-to-AuNP energy transfer
with AuNPs of different sizes has the potential to provide new insight for the debate on whether
FRET or NSET is the cause of AuNP-based PL quenching.
In the present study, we investigated the energy transfer interactions between Tb and AuNPs in
assemblies of Tb-labeled streptavidin (Tb-sAv) with biotinylated AuNPs (biot-AuNPs) having
diameters of 5, 30, 50, and 80 nm (Figure 1). Resonant light scattering spectroscopy (RLS) and
time-resolved PL spectroscopy were applied to characterize the different Tb-sAv-biot-AuNP
assemblies at various donor/acceptor ratios. PL decays of Tb-sAv-biot-AuNP assemblies at
different concentrations and with AuNPs of all four diameters were studied by both stretched-
exponential (Kohlrausch) and multi-exponential PL decay analyses. The energy transfer
This is the initially submitted version of the paper ”C. Chen, C. Midelet, S. Bhuckory, N. Hildebrandt, and M. H. V. Werts. Nanosurface Energy Transfer from Long-Lifetime Terbium Donors to Gold Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 17566−17574.” DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539.
4
efficiencies were found to be independent of the AuNP size. NSET theory provided excellent
agreement between the time-resolved PL results and the Tb-to-AuNP distances within the different
Tb-sAv-biot-AuNP assemblies, whereas application of FRET theory led to unrealistically long
Förster distances and Tb-AuNP distances without any correlation between the different AuNP
sizes. Our results strongly suggest that energy transfer between Tb and AuNPs is of NSET type,
which is a very important finding for understanding and designing AuNP-based biosensors and
assemblies of AuNPs with photoluminescent units.
Figure 1. Schematic representation (not to scale) of the assemblies of Tb-labeled sAv (Tb-sAv) and
biotinylated AuNPs (biot-AuNPs), in which excitation energy transfer occurs. For clarity only 3 biotins are
shown. The actual number of biotins attached to the surface of each AuNP was determined to be ca. 25,
900, 2500, and 6400 for the 5, 30, 50, and 80 nm diameter AuNPs, respectively. A distance of 4.5 nm was
estimated using a radius of 3 nm for sAv (size of sAv: 5.4 nm x 5.8 nm x 4.8 nm in the solid state)25 plus
1.5 nm for the biotin and linker attached to the AuNP.
Results and Discussion
Characterization of Tb-sAv-biot-AuNP assemblies. The number of binding sites for sAv
on each nanoparticle is of the same order of magnitude as the number of biotins per particle. In
principle, sAv can bind up to four biotins.26 The number of biotins per biot-AuNP were given by
the supplier as a number density of approximately 0.5/nm2 at the AuNP surface. At the same time,
the surface areas were given as 78.5, 2830, 7850, and 20100 nm2 for the 5, 30 nm, 50 nm, and
This is the initially submitted version of the paper ”C. Chen, C. Midelet, S. Bhuckory, N. Hildebrandt, and M. H. V. Werts. Nanosurface Energy Transfer from Long-Lifetime Terbium Donors to Gold Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 17566−17574.” DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539.
5
80 nm AuNPs, respectively, which led to 39 biotins per 5 nm AuNP, 1415 biotins per 30 nm AuNP,
3925 biotins per 50 nm AuNP, and 10050 biotins per 80 nm AuNP. Because no explanation of this
estimation was provided, we applied our own estimation based on the number of Au surface atoms,
which we calculated to be 500 for 5 nm biot-AuNPs, 18000 for the 30 nm biot-AuNPs, 50000 for
the 50 nm biot-AuNPs, and 128000 for the 80 nm biot-AuNPs. Assuming the number of available
biotins on the surface to be ca. 5% of the number of Au surface atoms led to 25 biotins per 5 nm
biot-AuNP, 900 biotins per 30 nm biot-AuNP, 2500 biotins per 50 nm biot-AuNP, and 6400 biotins
per 80 nm biot-AuNP, which were in good agreement with the estimates of the supplier. Taking
into account that four biotins from the biot-AuNP will be able to bind one sAv, and ignoring any
steric effects, the number of sAv that can bind to one nanoparticle is anticipated to be 6 for 5 nm
biot-AuNPs, 225 for 30 nm biot-AuNPs, 625 for 50 nm, and 1600 for 80 nm biot-AuNPs. PL
titrations reported below enabled us to refine these estimates.
The interaction of Tb-sAv with biot-AuNPs was investigated by monitoring the light scattering
spectra27,28 of the biot-AuNPs and introducing Tb-sAv into the solution. The light scattering
spectra consist of the localized surface plasmon resonance of AuNPs, which is sensitive to the
environment of the particles. In particular, immobilization of biomolecules at the nanoparticle
surface leads to small changes (a few nm) in the position of the maximum of these resonance
bands. Larger shifts of the plasmon maximum (> 10 nm) are in general the result of clustering of
AuNPs into aggregates, which leads to strong coupling between the localized plasmon resonances
of the individual particles27–30. The particular sensitivity of the resonant light scattering spectrum
towards the environment of the AuNPs provides a tool for monitoring the state of the biot-AuNPs
when interacting with Tb-sAv.
Figure 2 shows the evolution of the wavelength of the maximum 𝜆𝜆max of the resonant light
scattering spectrum of biot-AuNPs (30 nm, 50 nm, 80 nm diameter) over time, before and after
This is the initially submitted version of the paper ”C. Chen, C. Midelet, S. Bhuckory, N. Hildebrandt, and M. H. V. Werts. Nanosurface Energy Transfer from Long-Lifetime Terbium Donors to Gold Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 17566−17574.” DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539.
6
adding Tb-sAv to the solution. The light scattering by 5 nm AuNPs is too weak and was not
studied. The amount of Tb-sAv added was 25% of the amount needed to cover all binding sites on
the AuNPs (see Figure S5 for 200% amount of Tb-sAv added). The position of the maximum did
not change over time before adding Tb-sAv, which was in line with the stability of the biot-AuNPs
in the buffer. A prompt, small wavelength shift was observed in the light scattering resonance of
the biot-AuNPs when Tb-sAv was added to the solution. Subsequently, there was virtually no
evolution of 𝜆𝜆max at longer times after adding Tb-sAv. The observed evolution of 𝜆𝜆max is
consistent with the binding of Tb-sAv to the biot-AuNPs. The absence of changes in 𝜆𝜆max after
binding of Tb-sAv to the biot-AuNPs indicates that no significant clustering of Tb-sAv/biot-
AuNPs into multi-AuNP aggregates occurred, and that under the experimental conditions the only
donor-acceptor assemblies are based on single AuNPs.
Figure 2. Wavelength evolution of the maximum of the resonant light scattering band of biot-AuNPs (30,
50 and 80 nm diameter AuNPs) as a function of time. At t = 0, Tb-sAv (25% with respect to biot-AuNP
binding sites) was added.
PL titration experiments (Figure 3) provided further insight in the interaction between Tb-sAv
and biot-AuNPs. As the concentration of biot-AuNPs was increased in solutions of constant Tb-
sAv concentration, the integrated time-gated Tb PL intensity decreased sharply (Figure 3a), until
a certain concentration ratio, after which no further decrease took place. The decrease in overall
This is the initially submitted version of the paper ”C. Chen, C. Midelet, S. Bhuckory, N. Hildebrandt, and M. H. V. Werts. Nanosurface Energy Transfer from Long-Lifetime Terbium Donors to Gold Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 17566−17574.” DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539.
7
intensity was accompanied by the appearance of a short PL decay component in the Tb PL decay
curves (Figure 3b-d), at the expense of the long-lived Tb decay from the initial Tb-sAv, which
indicates energy transfer from Tb to AuNP.
Figure 3. PL titration of Tb-sAv with biot-AuNP (a) Integrated time-gated (0.1 – 2 ms) PL intensities of the
PL decay curves (black: 5 nm biot-AuNPs; red: 30 nm biot-AuNPs; blue: 50 nm biot-AuNPs; green: 80 nm
biot-AuNPs). Crossing of the green dotted lines (at 3 [biot-AuNP]/ [y Tb-sAv] with y = 6 for 5 nm biot-AuNPs,
y = 225 for 30 nm biot-AuNPs, y = 625 for 50 nm biot-AuNPs, and y = 1600 for 80 nm biot-AuNPs) indicates
the maximum number of Tb-sAv per biot-AuNP (6/3=2 for 5 nm biot-AuNPs, 225/3 = 75 for 30 nm biot-
AuNPs, 625/3 = 208 for 50 nm biot-AuNPs, and 1600/3 = 533 for 80 nm biot-AuNP (b-d): Selected PL decay
curves detected within the Tb donor channel for increasing ratios of (x biot-AuNPs) per (y Tb-sAv). (b)
30 nm biot-AuNPs with y = 225 Tb-sAv; (c) 50 nm biot-AuNPs with y = 625 Tb-sAv; (d) 80 nm biot-AuNPs
with y = 1600 Tb-sAv. Black: x = 0; red: x = 0.2; orange: x = 0.5; green: x = 1; blue: x = 2; violet: x = 3; pink:
x = 4.
This is the initially submitted version of the paper ”C. Chen, C. Midelet, S. Bhuckory, N. Hildebrandt, and M. H. V. Werts. Nanosurface Energy Transfer from Long-Lifetime Terbium Donors to Gold Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 17566−17574.” DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539.
8
The PL titration behavior can readily be interpreted in terms of the formation of Tb-sAv/biot-
AuNP assemblies. Taking into account the results from the resonant light scattering spectroscopy,
we can infer that these assemblies exist as isolated biot-AuNPs, bearing one or more Tb-sAv
entities. The concentration ratio [biot-AuNP]/[Tb-sAv] beyond which the PL intensity remains
constant, is the concentration ratio at which all (active) Tb-sAv are bound to biot-AuNP. This
happened in all cases at approximately 3 times the initially estimated concentration of biot-AuNP
necessary to bind all Tb-sAv. This common factor of 3 demonstrates the similarity in binding
behavior of the four diameters of particles, since the initial estimates were based on the same
assumptions for each particle diameter. According to the PL titrations, the binding capacity was 2,
75, 208, and 533 Tb-sAv per biot-AuNP, for 5 nm, 30 nm, 50 nm, and 80 nm AuNPs, respectively.
Using the surface areas of the different AuNPs (vide supra) and the size of sAv in the solid state
(5.8 nm x 5.4 nm x 4.9 nm),25 which would lead to a surface footprint of 24.6 nm2 (π x 2.9 nm x
2.7 nm), the simple geometrical estimates for coverage of sAv per AuNP are 3 (5 nm AuNPs),115
(30 nm AuNPs), 319 (50 nm AuNPs), and 817 (80 nm AuNPs). When taking into account the
curved surface of the AuNPs, the hydration layer of sAv, and possible steric hindrance in sAv
binding to biotin in very close proximity, the 35% lower values determined by PL titration are very
close to full surface coverage in the simple geometric surface approximation. At [biot-AuNP]/[Tb-
sAv] ratios below the equivalence point, biot-AuNPs carry the maximum number of Tb-sAv. At
excess biot-AuNP compared to Tb-sAv, the number of Tb-sAv per biot-AuNP decreases.
Time-resolved PL decay analysis. To investigate the energy transfer mechanism in the Tb-
AuNP assemblies, we analyzed the PL decay curves of solutions containing Tb-sAv and Tb-
sAv/biot-AuNP assemblies. The PL decay of unbound Tb-sAv in buffer slightly deviates from
mono-exponentiality (Figure 4a), which can be attributed to the conjugation of several Tb
This is the initially submitted version of the paper ”C. Chen, C. Midelet, S. Bhuckory, N. Hildebrandt, and M. H. V. Werts. Nanosurface Energy Transfer from Long-Lifetime Terbium Donors to Gold Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 17566−17574.” DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539.
9
complexes (~4) per sAv. The heterogeneity in the local environment experienced by each Tb ion
at the different sAv sites gives rise to a distribution of decay rates. A straightforward approach for
analyzing the PL decay of such a heterogeneous system is to use a Kohlrausch ('stretched
exponential') decay law as it describes the overall relaxation of systems with an underlying
distribution of relaxation rates using a minimal number of adjustable parameters.31–33 The
Kohlrausch decay law is given by Equation 1.
𝐼𝐼(𝑡𝑡) = 𝐴𝐴 exp �−�𝑡𝑡 �̃�𝜏� �𝛽𝛽� (1)
For β = 1, a mono-exponential decay is obtained; the underlying distribution is then a Dirac
function centered at the decay time constant. For β going from 1 toward 0, the underlying
distribution becomes increasingly broad. The average decay time constant for a Kohlrausch decay
law is given by Equation 2, where Γ is the gamma function.31
⟨𝜏𝜏⟩ = �̃�𝜏 Γ �1 +1𝛽𝛽�
(2)
The experimental PL decay of Tb-sAv in buffer is well described (Figure 4a) by the Kohlrausch
decay law Equation (2), with �̃�𝜏𝐷𝐷 = 2.07 ms and 𝛽𝛽𝐷𝐷 = 0.88, which yields average decay time
⟨𝜏𝜏⟩𝐷𝐷 = 2.19 ms. This average decay constant is very close to the average decay constant obtained
from a bi-exponential fit (⟨𝜏𝜏⟩𝐷𝐷 = 2.2 ms, (Supporting Figure S13). The advantage of using the
Kohlrausch decay law is that it requires only three parameters to be optimized compared to four
for a bi-exponential decay law. The close fit of this decay law to the data demonstrates its relevance
for the analysis of non-exponential PL decays of Tb complexes coupled to proteins, where a
distribution of decay constants is expected and observed.
This is the initially submitted version of the paper ”C. Chen, C. Midelet, S. Bhuckory, N. Hildebrandt, and M. H. V. Werts. Nanosurface Energy Transfer from Long-Lifetime Terbium Donors to Gold Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 17566−17574.” DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539.
10
Figure 4. (a) PL decay (λex = 337.1 nm; λem = (490±20) nm) of Tb-sAv in buffer (red) and fit (black) using a
single Kohlrausch (stretched exponential) decay law; yielding an average lifetime of ⟨τ⟩ = 2.19 ms. On top:
weighted residuals indicating a good fit between model and experimental data, reduced 𝜒𝜒2 = 1.26. (b)
Overlap between extinction spectra of 30 nm (black), 50 nm (red), and 80 nm (blue) biot-AuNP acceptors
and emission spectrum of the Tb-sAv donor (green). The extinction spectrum of 5 nm biotin AuNPs, which
is very weak, is given in the Supporting Information (Figure S1).
When biot-AuNPs are added to the solution, Tb-sAv/biot-AuNP donor-acceptor assemblies are
formed leading to a mixture of free (excess) Tb-sAv donors and Tb-sAv/biot-AuNP assemblies.
The overall PL decay can thus be considered to be the sum of the individual decays of these two
species, each described by a Kohlrausch decay, with the subscripts D and DA referring to the free
donor and the donor-acceptor assemblies, respectively (Equation 3).
𝐼𝐼(𝑡𝑡) = 𝐴𝐴𝐷𝐷 exp �− �𝑡𝑡 �̃�𝜏𝐷𝐷� �𝛽𝛽𝐷𝐷� + 𝐴𝐴𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷 exp �− �𝑡𝑡 �̃�𝜏𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷� �
𝛽𝛽𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷� (3)
For the values of �̃�𝜏𝐷𝐷 and 𝛽𝛽𝐷𝐷 we used the values obtained from the measurement of the pure Tb-
sAv donor, and we keep these fixed throughout our analysis, leaving only 𝐴𝐴𝐷𝐷, 𝐴𝐴𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷, �̃�𝜏𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷 and 𝛽𝛽𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷
to be determined by curve fitting. This was achieved by fitting the model Equation (3) to the data
using the 'lmfit' package34 in Python, by minimizing the sum-over-squares of the residuals with
the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. The residual for each time bin was weighted by 1 �𝑁𝑁𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐⁄ ,
This is the initially submitted version of the paper ”C. Chen, C. Midelet, S. Bhuckory, N. Hildebrandt, and M. H. V. Werts. Nanosurface Energy Transfer from Long-Lifetime Terbium Donors to Gold Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 17566−17574.” DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539.
11
where 𝑁𝑁𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 is the number of photons counted in the time bin. Reduced 𝜒𝜒2 values for the fits
obtained were in the range of 1.25 to 1.45.
The analysis of the PL decay titration of Tb-sAv with biot-Au50-NP are shown in Figure 5. In
presence of increasing biot-AuNP concentrations, the PL decay of the Tb-sAv donor is gradually
replaced with a shorter PL decay component. This shorter component is attributed to the PL of Tb-
sAv attached to the biot-AuNPs.
Figure 5. Analysis of PL decays of Tb-sAv (0.22 nM) in the presence of increasing amounts of 50 nm biot-
AuNP in buffer. (a) Experimental decay traces (red), with fitted two-component Kohlrausch decay laws
(black, Equation 3). The traces were scaled to equal initial amplitude for clarity. (b) Amplitude fraction of
the Tb-sAv/biot-AuNP donor-acceptor assembly PL decay in the total PL decay as a function of biot-AuNP
concentration, obtained from the curve fits. (c) Average PL decay times for the Tb-sAv/AuNP assemblies.
The dotted line indicates the minimal biot-AuNP concentration to bind all available Tb-sAv (i.e. 208 Tb-sAv
per biot-AuNP). The error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.
From the fits of the model to the data, we obtained the amplitudes of the donor and the donor-
acceptor assemblies (𝐴𝐴𝐷𝐷 resp. 𝐴𝐴𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷 ), as well as the kinetic parameters for the donor-acceptor
assemblies, �̃�𝜏𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷 and 𝛽𝛽𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷, as a function of 50nm biot-AuNPs concentration. From �̃�𝜏𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷 and 𝛽𝛽𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷,
we obtained the average decay time constant ⟨𝜏𝜏⟩𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷 using Equation 2. The donor-acceptor
amplitude 𝐴𝐴𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷 and average decay time ⟨𝜏𝜏⟩𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷 are plotted in Figure 5b and c, as a function of biot-
a
b
c
This is the initially submitted version of the paper ”C. Chen, C. Midelet, S. Bhuckory, N. Hildebrandt, and M. H. V. Werts. Nanosurface Energy Transfer from Long-Lifetime Terbium Donors to Gold Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 17566−17574.” DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539.
12
AuNPs concentration. The amplitude fraction of the signal of the Tb-AuNPs donor-acceptor
assemblies gradually increased with increasing concentration of biot-AuNPs and reached a plateau
near 0.9, indicating a small fraction of Tb-sAv that are inactive in terms of binding to biotin. The
luminescence decay due to this non-binding fraction contributes to the signal of the donor-only
decay (described by amplitude 𝐴𝐴𝐷𝐷 and lifetime ⟨𝜏𝜏⟩𝐷𝐷) but does not affect the determination of
lifetime ⟨𝜏𝜏⟩𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷 of the donor-acceptor assembly in the curve fits since the model used effectively
separates donor and donor-acceptor contributions.
The average PL decay time of the donor-acceptor assemblies remains constant when excess biot-
AuNPs is present, i.e. in the cases where only few Tb-sAv are attached to each biot-AuNP. In
contrast, the PL decay becomes shorter when the density of Tb-sAv per biot-AuNPs is higher
(conditions of excess Tb-sAv). We tentatively ascribe this to energy transfer interactions between
Tb-complexes at the surface of the nanoparticles at high Tb-sAv loading levels. Another, less
likely, explanation may be that a dense packing of Tb-sAv at the biot-AuNP surface changes the
structure of the PEG-biotin ligand shell in such a way as to reduce the average distance between
Tb complexes and AuNP surface. In order to avoid contributions of these effects at high loading
level, only the measurements at low loading (higher biot-AuNPs concentrations – where ⟨𝜏𝜏⟩𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷
remains constant) are included in energy transfer analysis. In these cases we are approaching the
idealized situation where one Tb-complex interacts purely with one AuNP.
Similar behavior was observed with the 5 nm, 30 nm and 80 nm biot-AuNPs (Figures S10, S11
and S12). Using the analysis procedure based on the Kohlrausch decay law, we are able to find the
average decay times ⟨𝜏𝜏⟩𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷 of Tb(III) luminescence in the donor-acceptor complexes. The results
of this Kohlrausch-decay analysis for all AuNP diameters have been collected into Table 1. We
consider the average decay time constants for the Tb-sAv/biot-AuNP at low Tb-sAv loading (i.e.
This is the initially submitted version of the paper ”C. Chen, C. Midelet, S. Bhuckory, N. Hildebrandt, and M. H. V. Werts. Nanosurface Energy Transfer from Long-Lifetime Terbium Donors to Gold Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 17566−17574.” DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539.
13
high biot-AuNPs concentrations) in order to evaluate the energy transfer efficiency from the Tb
complex to the gold nanoparticle, using Equation 4.
𝜂𝜂 = 1 −
⟨𝜏𝜏⟩DA⟨𝜏𝜏⟩D
(4)
Table 1. Tb donor and Tb-sAv/biot-AuNP donor-acceptor decay times obtained from fits of decay models
to the experimental Tb(III) luminescence decay. Uncertainties are reported as 95% confidence intervals.
Kohlrausch decay model Multi-exponential decay model AuNP diam. (nm)
⟨𝜏𝜏⟩𝐷𝐷 (ms)
⟨𝜏𝜏⟩𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷 (ms)
𝜂𝜂 ⟨𝜏𝜏⟩𝐷𝐷 (ms)
⟨𝜏𝜏⟩𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷 (ms)
𝜂𝜂
5 2.17(±0.02) 0.80(±0.01) 0.63(±0.01) 2.15(±0.02) 0.81(±0.02) 0.62(±0.01) 30 2.23(±0.02) 0.19(±0.01) 0.91(±0.01) 2.20(±0.02) 0.31(±0.02) 0.86(±0.02) 50 2.20(±0.02) 0.46(±0.01) 0.79(±0.01) 2.19(±0.02) 0.47(±0.01) 0.79(±0.01) 80[a] 1.66(±0.02) 0.14(±0.02) 0.92(±0.02) 1.78(±0.02) 0.22(±0.03) 0.87(±0.02)
[a] Measurements for 80 nm biot-AuNPs were done in pure water instead of buffer; the donor lifetime is slightly shorter in this solvent.
In all cases, the energy transfer efficiency was larger than 50%, but less than 95%, leaving some
Tb(III) luminescence available for detection. In spite of the giant oscillator strengths of the
localized plasmon resonance, luminescence quenching is incomplete, and incorporation of
photoluminescent entities into assemblies of plasmonic particles for fluorescence tracking and
sensing purposes remains feasible.
In addition to the Kohlrausch decay model introduced here, the PL decay curves were analyzed
with a multi-exponential analysis (Supporting Information) that has been successfully applied in
past studies for Tb-to-quantum dot FRET systems.34-36 The multi-exponential analysis led to
similar results as the Kohlrausch analysis (see Table 1), indicating the consistency between the
two models. The Kohlrausch model has the advantage of carrying less adjustable parameters and
This is the initially submitted version of the paper ”C. Chen, C. Midelet, S. Bhuckory, N. Hildebrandt, and M. H. V. Werts. Nanosurface Energy Transfer from Long-Lifetime Terbium Donors to Gold Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 17566−17574.” DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539.
14
providing a clearer separation between donor-only and donor-acceptor contributions to the overall
luminescence decay.
Energy transfer mechanism: FRET vs NSET. The energy transfer efficiencies indicate that
PL quenching takes place by non-radiative energy transfer, and also that this quenching is
incomplete, leaving some emission to be detected. Gold nanoparticles are known to be efficient
quenchers for luminophores very close to their surface35–38 and the mechanism for this quenching
has been attributed to either FRET or NSET mechanisms.9,10,39,11–18 We therefore subjected our PL
decay time results to both FRET and NSET theory with the aim of contributing to the
understanding of energy transfer processes in assemblies of photoluminescent entities and
plasmonic nanoparticles, in particular to find out which theory, FRET of NSET, makes the best
predictions about energy transfer in these systems. The long-lived PL emission from Tb enables a
clear distinction of the Tb from other, short-lived background PL, while still being subject to
electric dipole-dipole energy transfer.40
For FRET model analysis, the overlap integral (J) and Förster distance (R0) were calculated
using Equations 5 and 6.
𝐽𝐽 = �Ī𝐷𝐷(𝜆𝜆)𝜀𝜀A(𝜆𝜆)𝜆𝜆4d𝜆𝜆 (5)
where ĪD(𝜆𝜆) is the area-normalized emission spectrum of donor, εA(𝜆𝜆) is the molar absorptivity
spectrum of the acceptor in M-1cm-1, and λ is the wavelength in nm. Figure 4b shows the intensity-
normalized (area under the emission spectrum from 450 to 700 nm normalized to unity) PL
spectrum of Tb donor and the absorption spectra of the differently sized biot-AuNP acceptors (30,
50, and 80 nm).
This is the initially submitted version of the paper ”C. Chen, C. Midelet, S. Bhuckory, N. Hildebrandt, and M. H. V. Werts. Nanosurface Energy Transfer from Long-Lifetime Terbium Donors to Gold Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 17566−17574.” DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539.
15
𝑅𝑅0 = 0.0211[𝜅𝜅2ΦD(𝑛𝑛)−4J(λ)]1/6 (in nm) (6)
Where κ2 is orientation factor (κ2=2/3 due to dynamic averaging as found for other Tb-NP donor-
acceptor systems),24,41 ΦD is Tb-centered quantum yield of the Tb donor (0.64), and n is the
refractive index of the surrounding medium. The molar extinction coefficients 𝜀𝜀AuNP(𝜆𝜆) for gold
nanoparticles were obtained from the extinction cross sections calculated with analytic Mie
expressions.42 These are known to have excellent agreement with experimentally determined cross
sections.27
Förster distances (R0) were calculated to be 14.1 nm, 34.8 nm, 46.8 nm, and 60.7 nm (for 5, 30,
50, and 80 nm AuNPs, respectively) when using the refractive index of the aqueous buffer (Table
2) or 17.4 nm, 43.1 nm, 57.9 nm, and 75.1 nm, when using the refractive index of gold (Table S5).
To fit the FRET model to different sizes of AuNPs, Wu et al. have suggested to subtract the radius
of the AuNPs from the R0 values.17 In our case, that would lead to R0 distances 11.6 nm, 19.8 nm,
21.8 nm, and 20.7 nm when using the refractive index of the aqueous buffer and 14.9 nm, 28.1 nm,
32.9 nm, and 35.1 nm when using the refractive index of gold. All R0 values are far beyond the
expected Tb-sAv/biot-AuNP distances, which provides good evidence that the FRET mechanism
is not operational here.
Table 2. FRET model evaluation of resonance energy transfer from Tb to AuNPs
5 nm 30 nm 50 nm 80 nm
κ² : 2/3 2/3 2/3 2/3
ΦD : 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64
N (refractive index): 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35
J(λ) (M-1 cm-1 nm4): 6.9 x 1017 1.6 x 1020 9.3 x 1020 4.4 x 1021
R0 (nm): 14.1 34.8 46.8 60.7
This is the initially submitted version of the paper ”C. Chen, C. Midelet, S. Bhuckory, N. Hildebrandt, and M. H. V. Werts. Nanosurface Energy Transfer from Long-Lifetime Terbium Donors to Gold Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 17566−17574.” DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539.
16
Within the FRET model, the Tb-AuNP distance (r) was calculated using Equation 7. 5
𝑟𝑟 = 𝑅𝑅0 �
𝜏𝜏𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝜏𝜏𝐷𝐷 − 𝜏𝜏𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷
�1/6
(7)
As shown in detail in Tables S6 and S7, the calculated distances between Tb and the AuNP
surface globally range from 4.2 nm to 50.5 nm (excluding an unrealistic 0.8 nm value). The
calculated distances span a very large range with almost all values far beyond a distance that could
be attained by the dimensions of the streptavidin-biotin pair separating the Tb donors from the
gold nanosurface. Moreover, these calculated distances do not show much consistency between
the results for 5 nm, 30 nm, 50 nm and 80 nm particles, and there is ambiguity in how to handle
the fact that the AuNPs cannot be treated as a point dipole.
For NSET analysis, the R0 was calculated by Equation 8. 11,12
𝑅𝑅0𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁 = �0.225
ΦD
𝜔𝜔D
1𝜔𝜔F𝑘𝑘F
𝑐𝑐3�1/4
(8)
where ωD is the angular frequency resonant with the donor electronic transition, ωf and kf are
the angular frequency and the Fermi vector for bulk gold, respectively, and c is the speed of light.
The calculated R0NSET
was 7.2 nm for all three different sizes of AuNPs (Table 3). In NSET, R0 is
independent of nanoparticle diameter, since the energy transfer is assumed to be to a flat surface,
which is a good approximation for a small emitting dipole in proximity to a much larger sphere.
This is the initially submitted version of the paper ”C. Chen, C. Midelet, S. Bhuckory, N. Hildebrandt, and M. H. V. Werts. Nanosurface Energy Transfer from Long-Lifetime Terbium Donors to Gold Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 17566−17574.” DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539.
17
Table 3. NSET model evaluation of resonance energy transfer from Tb to AuNPs
c (m/s): 3 x 108
ΦD: 0.64
ωD (s-1): 3.8 x 1015
ωF (s-1): 8.4 x 1015
kF(m-1) 1.2 x 1010
R0 (nm): 7.2
The Tb-AuNP distance (r) was subsequently calculated using Equation 9.5
𝑟𝑟 = 𝑅𝑅0𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁 �
𝜏𝜏𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝜏𝜏𝐷𝐷 − 𝜏𝜏𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷
�1/4
(9)
With the PL decay times for the donor and the donor-acceptor assemblies as determined above,
and the 𝑅𝑅0 determined using NSET theory, Tb-AuNP distances r were obtained that are collected
in Table 4. All distances found are in the 4.0 to 6.4 nm range, and do not show a strong dependence
on the acceptor AuNP diameter. Moreover, these distances are well in line with the estimated
average distance of the Tb complexes conjugated randomly to the sAv binding via biotin to the
surface of the AuNP (Figure 1).
Table 4. Tb-AuNP surface distances r calculated from the experimental luminescence decay times and the
NSET theory. Distances were calculated from both the Kohlrausch PL decay analysis and the
multiexponential decay results.
Kohlrausch decay model Multi-exponential decay model AuNP diam. (nm)
𝑟𝑟 𝑅𝑅0⁄ r (nm) [a] 𝑟𝑟 𝑅𝑅0⁄ r (nm) [a]
5 0.87 (±0.01) 6.3 (±0.6) 0.88 (±0.01) 6.4 (±0.7) 30 0.55 (±0.01) 4.0 (±0.4) 0.63 (±0.03) 4.5 (±0.3) 50 0.72 (±0.01) 5.2 (±0.5) 0.72 (±0.01) 5.2 (±0.6) 80 0.55 (±0.02) 4.0 (±0.4) 0.62 (±0.03) 4.5 (±0.5)
[a] using 𝑅𝑅0 = 7.2(±0.7) nm, assuming 10% uncertainty on 𝑅𝑅0
This is the initially submitted version of the paper ”C. Chen, C. Midelet, S. Bhuckory, N. Hildebrandt, and M. H. V. Werts. Nanosurface Energy Transfer from Long-Lifetime Terbium Donors to Gold Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 17566−17574.” DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539.
18
When considering the overall uncertainty on the donor-acceptor distances r derived from the
experimental luminescence decay measurements, we distinguish two main sources of
uncertaintity, the first being the experimental error on the experimental decay times, the second
the uncertainty on the value on 𝑅𝑅0𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁. In order to separate these two contributions to the overall
uncertainty, we have included the ratio 𝑟𝑟 𝑅𝑅0⁄ in Table 4. This ratio thus depends solely on the
uncertainty of the experimental measurements, which is relatively small. The uncertainty on
𝑅𝑅0𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁was estimated to be 10 % and represents a systematic uncertainty. The NSET model
afforded a set of donor-acceptor distances that are similar for the various AuNP diameters studied
and consistent with the expected structure of Tb-sAv/biot-AuNP assemblies.
Conclusion
We have demonstrated efficient energy transfer between Tb donors and AuNP acceptors within
different Tb-sAv/biot-AuNPs assemblies for AuNPs of 5 nm, 30 nm, 50 nm, and 80 nm diameter.
Characterization by RLS and time-resolved PL spectroscopy demonstrated the assembly of Tb-
sAv to biot-AuNP with ratios up to 2 (5 nm AuNPs), 75 (30 nm AuNPs), 208 (50 nm AuNPs), and
533 (80 nm AuNPs) Tb-sAv per biot-AuNP, in good agreement with expectations based on the
surface areas of the particles and the biotinylation density of the AuNPs. The stable Tb-sAv/biot-
AuNP assemblies were investigated at different Tb-sAv per biot-AuNP ratios, and AuNP sizes in
aqueous solutions by time-resolved PL spectroscopy. The resulting PL decay curves were studied
using both Kohlrausch (stretched exponential) and multi-exponential PL lifetime models, which
yielded mutually consistent results. The Kohlrausch method introduced here requires less fitting
parameters and is therefore attractive for analysis of this type of donor-acceptor systems, in which
This is the initially submitted version of the paper ”C. Chen, C. Midelet, S. Bhuckory, N. Hildebrandt, and M. H. V. Werts. Nanosurface Energy Transfer from Long-Lifetime Terbium Donors to Gold Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 17566−17574.” DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539.
19
a heterogeneity exists in the chemical environments of the luminescent species. The analyses
showed that energy transfer efficiencies were independent of the AuNP size. In contrast to FRET,
NSET theory provided a coherent analysis of the experimental energy transfer results. The Tb
donor to Au-NP surface acceptor distances determined based on NSET proved in excellent
agreement with the structural conditions of the biotin-sAv binding on the AuNP surface. Our
results present strong evidence favoring NSET over FRET as the operational energy transfer
mechanism for the PL quenching of electric dipole emitters by AuNPs.
When comparing the quenching efficiencies predicted by NSET and by FRET, we find that
NSET predicts less quenching for a given donor-acceptor distance, especially at shorter distance.
This makes it more likely that fluorescence of fluorophores attached to plasmonic nanoparticles is
partially retained and can still be useful for detection of such assemblies. Moreover, successful
design and optimization of biosensors such as “nano-flares”19,20 and molecular rulers10 based on
AuNP PL quenching is clearly dependent on the understanding of the underlying energy transfer
mechanism, to which our study has contributed important findings in favor of NSET.
Materials and Methods
Reagents. The biot-AuNPs were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (5, 30, 50, and 80 nm diameter,
biotin-terminated PEG mol. wt. 5000, dispersion in H2O). For the measurements of 5, 30 and 50
nm Au NPs, 2 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.5) was used as a solvent, for the measurements of 80 nm Au
NPs, pure water was used as a solvent. Black Costar Half Area 96 well microtitration plates were
This is the initially submitted version of the paper ”C. Chen, C. Midelet, S. Bhuckory, N. Hildebrandt, and M. H. V. Werts. Nanosurface Energy Transfer from Long-Lifetime Terbium Donors to Gold Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 17566−17574.” DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539.
20
purchased from Corning Inc. (Corning, NY, USA), and Tb complexes (Lumi4-Tb) functionalized
to sAv at a ratio of 4 Tb/sAv were provided by Lumiphore Inc. (Berkeley, CA, USA).
Optimization of buffer conditions. Optical extinction and light scattering spectra were
measured on solutions of the biot-AuNPs in a selection of aqueous buffers. These spectroscopic
measurements enabled to determine the long-term stability of biot-AuNPs in these buffers.
Colloidal stability is a requirement for reliable results when forming donor-acceptor assemblies.
Aggregation of instable AuNPs would lead to clearly observable changes in the optical spectra.
Light scattering spectroscopy is particularly sensitive towards even slight changes in the chemical
environment of plasmonic AuNPs.27,28 From these measurements (see Figure S2 to S4), it was
concluded that 2 to 4 mM Tris-HCl buffer at pH 8.5, and pure water were the most suitable media
for the experiments. An alternative buffer, phosphate-buffered saline (10 mM phosphate, pH 7.2,
137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl) also yielded stable nanoparticle solutions (no shift of the localized
surface plasmon resonance maximum) but led to more pronounced “sticking” of the biot-AuNPs
to the walls of the spectroscopic cells.
Formation of Tb/AuNP donor-acceptor assemblies. We used different but constant
concentrations of Tb-sAv for the experiments with each of the three AuNPs. To these constant
concentrations of Tb-sAv, increasing amounts of biot-AuNPs were added, such that the fraction
of biot-AuNPs (x) was given per 6 Tb-sAv for 5 nm biot-AuNPs (25/4 = 6; 25 biotins on 4 sAv
binding sites), per 225 Tb-sAv for 30 nm biot-AuNPs (900/4 = 225), per 625 Tb-sAv for 50 nm
biot-AuNPs (2500/4 = 625), and per 1600 Tb-sAv for 80 nm biot-AuNPs (6400/4 = 1600). Tb-
sAv was dissolved to 20.7 µM in anhydrous DMF, which corresponded to 82.8 μM of Tb
(conjugation ratio of 4 Tb/sAv). For 5 nm biot-AuNPs, Tb-sAv was diluted to 2.73 nM in pure
water. For the total measuring volume of 150 µL, 50 μL of Tb-sAv solutions were mixed with
100 µL of biot-AuNP solutions containing increasing amounts (0, 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70,
This is the initially submitted version of the paper ”C. Chen, C. Midelet, S. Bhuckory, N. Hildebrandt, and M. H. V. Werts. Nanosurface Energy Transfer from Long-Lifetime Terbium Donors to Gold Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 17566−17574.” DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539.
21
80 μL) of 5 nm biot-AuNPs (9.09 nM) in 2 mM Tris-HCl buffer at pH 8.5. The mixtures were
incubated for 2 h at 37° C. For 30 nm biot-AuNPs, Tb-sAv was diluted to 1.33 nM in pure water.
For the total measuring volume of 150 µL, 50 μL of Tb-sAv solutions were mixed with 100 µL of
biot-AuNP solutions containing increasing amounts (0, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 80 μL) of 30
nm biot-AuNPs (29.6 pM) in 2 mM Tris-HCl buffer at pH 8.5. The mixtures were incubated for 2
h at 37° C. For 50 nm biot-AuNPs, Tb-sAv was diluted to 0.65 nM in pure water. For the total
measuring volume of 150 µL, 50 μL of Tb-sAv solutions were mixed with 100 µL of biot-AuNP
solutions containing increasing amounts (0, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 80 μL) of 50 nm biot-
AuNPs (5.3 pM) in 2 mM Tris-HCl buffer at pH 8.5. The mixtures were incubated for 2 h at 37° C.
For 80 nm biot-AuNPs, Tb-sAv was diluted to 0.72 nM in pure water. For the total measuring
volume of 150 µL, 50 μL of Tb-sAv solutions were mixed with 100 µL of biot-AuNP solutions
containing increasing amounts (0, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20 μL) of 80 nm biot-AuNPs (2.24 pM) in pure
water. The mixtures were incubated while shaking slowly overnight at room temperature.
Analytical Methods. Extinction spectra were acquired using a Lambda 35 UV/Vis
spectrophotometer from Perkin Elmer or on a modular fiber-based spectrometer system
(OceanOptics LS-1 white light source and USB4000- VIS-NIR CCD spectrometer). Resonant light
scattering spectroscopy (RLS) of the AuNP and AuNP-Tb-sAv solutions was performed using a
fibre-coupled incandescent white light source (AvaLight-HAL-(S)-mini) and an OceanOptics
QE65000 spectrograph, at right angle, using our published method,27,28,43 A 200x diluted Ludox
solution44 in 50 mM aqueous NaCl was used as the reference. The corrected light scattering spectra
represent the relative light scattering cross sections as a function of wavelength.
In the kinetics experiments probing the stability of the biot-AuNP solutions and the binding of
Tb-sAv to biot-AuNP, corrected light scattering spectra were recorded at evenly spaced time
intervals (rate typically 1 spectrum per 10 s). The position of the maximum of the resonant light
This is the initially submitted version of the paper ”C. Chen, C. Midelet, S. Bhuckory, N. Hildebrandt, and M. H. V. Werts. Nanosurface Energy Transfer from Long-Lifetime Terbium Donors to Gold Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 17566−17574.” DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539.
22
scattering band 𝜆𝜆maxRLS in each recorded spectrum was determined by fitting a parabola through the
data points in a narrow spectral window (Δ𝜆𝜆 = 10 nm) around the numerical maximum. The
maximum of the parabola obtained from this first fit was then used as the center point for a second
parabolic fit through the measured spectral data points over a narrow window (Δ𝜆𝜆 = 10 nm), from
which a refined determination of the position of the maximum was deduced. This procedure
yielded stable and reproducible measurement of the position of the resonant light scattering
maximum 𝜆𝜆maxRLS and mitigates problems due to noise on the measured spectrum.
For the measurement of the PL decay curves of the Tb to AuNPs, an EI fluorescence plate reader
(Edinburgh Instruments, UK) was used. For the multichannel scaler, 4000 detection bins of 2 μs
integration time were used. A nitrogen laser (LTB, Berlin, Germany) was used for excitation
(337.1 nm, 20 Hz, 600 flashes). (494 ± 20) nm bandpass filter was used for analyzing the Tb PL.
Multi-exponential fits to the data were done with FAST software version 3.1 (Edinburgh
Instruments, UK). Kohlrausch decay analysis was done using the Python programming language
and the 'lmfit' package.34 All assays were measured in black 96-well microtiter plates with an
optimal working volume of 150 μL.
Acknowledgment. The authors thank Lumiphore, Inc. for the gift of Lumi4 reagents and Dr J. M. Zwier for stimulating discussions concerning the Kohlrausch “stretched exponential” decay function. This work was partially funded by Agence Nationale de la Recherche (grant ANR-2010-JCJC-1005-1, “COMONSENS”) and the European Commission (H2020 FET-Open project PROSEQO). CM and MHVW acknowledge financial support from Région Bretagne and ENS Rennes (ARED Ph.D. programme, project “ELFENOR”). CC acknowledges the IDEX Paris-Saclay (Investissements d'avenir) for his PhD fellowship. NH acknowledges the Institut Universitaire de France (IUF) for financial support.
Supporting Information. Stability of the AuNPs in buffer (Figure S2 to S4) and in the presence of excess sAv (Figure S5), time-resolved PL decays of Tb-sAv/biot-AuNP assemblies (Figure S6 to S9), Kohlrausch stretched-exponential analysis of Tb PL decays for 5nm, 30 nm and 80 nm AuNPs (Figures S10 to S12), multi-exponential PL decay analysis (Figure S13, Tables S1 to S4),
This is the initially submitted version of the paper ”C. Chen, C. Midelet, S. Bhuckory, N. Hildebrandt, and M. H. V. Werts. Nanosurface Energy Transfer from Long-Lifetime Terbium Donors to Gold Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 17566−17574.” DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539.
23
and additional FRET investigations (Tables S5 and S7). The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at …
References
(1) Selvin, P. R. The Renaissance of Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer. Nat. Struct.
Biol. 2000, 7, 730–734.
(2) Ha, T. Single-Molecule Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer. Methods 2001, 25, 78–
86.
(3) Weiss, S. Measuring Conformational Dynamics of Biomolecules by Single Molecule
Fluorescence Spectroscopy. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2000, 7, 724–729.
(4) Clapp, A. R.; Medintz, I. L.; Mauro, J. M.; Fisher, B. R.; Bawendi, M. G.; Mattoussi, H.
Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Between Quantum Dot Donors and Dye-Labeled
Protein Acceptors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 301–310.
(5) Medintz, I.; Hildebrandt, N. FRET - Förster Resonance Energy Transfer; Medintz, I.,
Hildebrandt, N., Eds.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany,
2013.
(6) Sekar, R. B.; Periasamy, A. Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) Microscopy
Imaging of Live Cell Protein Localizations. J. Cell Biol 2003, 160, 629–633.
(7) Persson, B. N. J.; Lang, N. D. Electron-Hole-Pair Quenching of Excited States near a Metal.
Phys. Rev. B 1982, 26, 5409–5415.
(8) Samanta, A.; Zhou, Y.; Zou, S.; Yan, H.; Liu, Y. Fluorescence Quenching of Quantum Dots
by Gold Nanoparticles: A Potential Long Range Spectroscopic Ruler. Nano Lett. 2014, 14,
5052–5057.
(9) Pons, T.; Medintz, I. L.; Sapsford, K. E.; Higashiya, S.; Grimes, A. F.; English, D. S.;
Mattoussi, H. On the Quenching of Semiconductor Quantum Dot Photoluminescence by
Proximal Gold Nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 3157–3164.
(10) Yun, C. S.; Javier, A.; Jennings, T.; Fisher, M.; Hira, S.; Peterson, S.; Hopkins, B.; Reich,
N. O.; Strouse, G. F. Nanometal Surface Energy Transfer in Optical Rulers, Breaking the
FRET Barrier. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3115–3119.
(11) Jennings, T. L.; Schlatterer, J. C.; Singh, M. P.; Greenbaum, N. L.; Strouse, G. F. NSET
Molecular Beacon Analysis of Hammerhead RNA Substrate Binding and Catalysis. Nano
This is the initially submitted version of the paper ”C. Chen, C. Midelet, S. Bhuckory, N. Hildebrandt, and M. H. V. Werts. Nanosurface Energy Transfer from Long-Lifetime Terbium Donors to Gold Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 17566−17574.” DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539.
24
Lett. 2006, 6, 1318–1324.
(12) Jennings, T. L.; Singh, M. P.; Strouse, G. F. Fluorescent Lifetime Quenching near d = 1.5
Nm Gold Nanoparticles: Probing NSET Validity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 5462–5467.
(13) Chen, Y.; O’Donoghue, M. B.; Huang, Y.-F.; Kang, H.; Phillips, J. A.; Chen, X.; Estevez,
M.-C.; Yang, C. J.; Tan, W. A Surface Energy Transfer Nanoruler for Measuring Binding
Site Distances on Live Cell Surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 16559–16570.
(14) Zhang, X.; Marocico, C. A.; Lunz, M.; Gerard, V. A.; Gun’Ko, Y. K.; Lesnyak, V.;
Gaponik, N.; Susha, A. S.; Rogach, A. L.; Bradley, A. L. Wavelength, Concentration, and
Distance Dependence of Nonradiative Energy Transfer to a Plane of Gold Nanoparticles.
ACS Nano 2012, 6, 9283–9290.
(15) Saraswat, S.; Desireddy, A.; Zheng, D.; Guo, L.; Lu, H. P.; Bigioni, T. P.; Isailovic, D.
Energy Transfer from Fluorescent Proteins to Metal Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011,
115, 17587–17593.
(16) Kapur, A.; Aldeek, F.; Ji, X.; Safi, M.; Wang, W.; Del Cid, A.; Steinbock, O.; Mattoussi,
H. Self-Assembled Gold Nanoparticle–Fluorescent Protein Conjugates as Platforms for
Sensing Thiolate Compounds via Modulation of Energy Transfer Quenching. Bioconjug.
Chem. 2017, 28, 678–687.
(17) Li, M.; Cushing, S. K.; Wang, Q.; Shi, X.; Hornak, L. A.; Hong, Z.; Wu, N. Size-Dependent
Energy Transfer between CdSe/ZnS Quantum Dots and Gold Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem.
Lett. 2011, 2, 2125–2129.
(18) Guo, W.; Wei, Y.; Dai, Z.; Chen, G.; Chu, Y.; Zhao, Y. Nanostructure and Corresponding
Quenching Efficiency of Fluorescent DNA Probes. Materials (Basel). 2018, 11, 272.
(19) Li, N.; Chang, C.; Pan, W.; Tang, B. A Multicolor Nanoprobe for Detection and Imaging
of Tumor-Related MRNAs in Living Cells. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 7426–7430.
(20) Vilela, P.; Heuer-Jungemann, A.; El-Sagheer, A.; Brown, T.; Muskens, O. L.; Smyth, N.
R.; Kanaras, A. G. Sensing of Vimentin MRNA in 2D and 3D Models of Wounded Skin
Using DNA-Coated Gold Nanoparticles. Small 2018, 14, 1703489.
(21) Zhong, Y.; Zeng, F.; Chen, J.; Wu, S.; Hou, C.; Tong, Z. Modulation of Fluorescence of a
Terbium-Complex-Containing Polymer by Gold Nanoparticles through Energy Transfer. J.
Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2007, 17, 679–685.
(22) Comby, S.; Gunnlaugsson, T. Luminescent Lanthanide-Functionalized Gold Nanoparticles:
Exploiting the Interaction with Bovine Serum Albumin for Potential Sensing Applications.
This is the initially submitted version of the paper ”C. Chen, C. Midelet, S. Bhuckory, N. Hildebrandt, and M. H. V. Werts. Nanosurface Energy Transfer from Long-Lifetime Terbium Donors to Gold Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 17566−17574.” DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539.
25
ACS Nano 2011, 5, 7184–7197.
(23) Ipe, B. I.; Yoosaf, K.; Thomas, K. G. Functionalized Gold Nanoparticles as Phosphorescent
Nanomaterials and Sensors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1907–1913.
(24) Hildebrandt, N.; Wegner, K. D.; Algar, W. R. Luminescent Terbium Complexes: Superior
Förster Resonance Energy Transfer Donors for Flexible and Sensitive Multiplexed
Biosensing. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2014, 273–274, 125–138.
(25) Hendrickson, W. A.; Pähler, A.; Smith, J. L.; Satow, Y.; Merritt, E. A.; Phizackerley, R. P.
Crystal Structure of Core Streptavidin Determined from Multiwavelength Anomalous
Diffraction of Synchrotron Radiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1989, 86, 2190–2194.
(26) Geißler, D.; Charbonnière, L. J.; Ziessel, R. F.; Butlin, N. G.; Löhmannsröben, H. G.;
Hildebrandt, N. Quantum Dot Biosensors for Ultrasensitive Multiplexed Diagnostic.
Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 1396–1401.
(27) Navarro, J. R. G.; Werts, M. H. V. Resonant Light Scattering Spectroscopy of Gold, Silver
and Gold–silver Alloy Nanoparticles and Optical Detection in Microfluidic Channels.
Analyst 2013, 138, 583–592.
(28) Loumaigne, M.; Midelet, C.; Doussineau, T.; Dugourd, P.; Antoine, R.; Stamboul, M.;
Débarre, A.; Werts, M. H. V. Optical Extinction and Scattering Cross Sections of Plasmonic
Nanoparticle Dimers in Aqueous Suspension. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 6555–6570.
(29) Englebienne, P. Use of Colloidal Gold Surface Plasmon Resonance Peak Shift to Infer
Affinity Constants from the Interactions between Protein Antigens and Antibodies Specific
for Single or Multiple Epitopes. Analyst 1998, 123, 1599–1603.
(30) Ghosh, S. K.; Pal, T. Interparticle Coupling Effect on the Surface Plasmon Resonance of
Gold Nanoparticles: From Theory to Applications. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 4797–4862.
(31) Berberan-Santos, M. N.; Bodunov, E. N.; Valeur, B. Mathematical Functions for the
Analysis of Luminescence Decays with Underlying Distributions 1. Kohlrausch Decay
Function (Stretched Exponential). Chem. Phys. 2005, 315, 171–182.
(32) Johnston, D. C. Stretched Exponential Relaxation Arising from a Continuous Sum of
Exponential Decays. Phys. Rev. B 2006, 74, 184430.
(33) Zwier, J. M.; Van Rooij, G. J.; Hofstraat, J. W.; Brakenhoff, G. J. Image Calibration in
Fluorescence Microscopy. J. Microsc. 2004, 216, 15–24.
(34) Newville, M.; Ingargiola, A.; Stensitzki, T.; Allen, D. B. LMFIT: Non-Linear Least-Square
Minimization and Curve-Fitting for Python, Zenodo, 2014, doi:10.5281/zenodo.1813.
This is the initially submitted version of the paper ”C. Chen, C. Midelet, S. Bhuckory, N. Hildebrandt, and M. H. V. Werts. Nanosurface Energy Transfer from Long-Lifetime Terbium Donors to Gold Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122, 17566−17574.” DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539; https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06539.
26
(35) Loumaigne, M.; Praho, R.; Nutarelli, D.; Werts, M. H. V; Débarre, A. Fluorescence
Correlation Spectroscopy Reveals Strong Fluorescence Quenching of FITC Adducts on
PEGylated Gold Nanoparticles in Water and the Presence of Fluorescent Aggregates of
Desorbed Thiolate Ligands. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 11004.
(36) Navarro, J. R. G.; Plugge, M.; Loumaigne, M.; Sanchez-Gonzalez, A.; Mennucci, B.;
Débarre, A.; Brouwer, A. M.; Werts, M. H. V. Probing the Interactions between Disulfide-
Based Ligands and Gold Nanoparticles Using a Functionalised Fluorescent Perylene-
Monoimide Dye. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2010, 9, 1042.
(37) Nerambourg, N.; Praho, R.; Werts, M. H. V.; Thomas, D.; Blanchard-Desce, M.
Hydrophilic Monolayer-Protected Gold Nanoparticles and Their Functionalisation with
Fluorescent Chromophores. Int. J. Nanotechnol. 2008, 5, 722.
(38) Huang, T.; Murray, R. W. Quenching of [Ru(Bpy) 3 ] 2+ Fluorescence by Binding to Au
Nanoparticles. Langmuir 2002, 18, 7077–7081.
(39) Ji, X.; Wang, W.; Mattoussi, H. Controlling the Spectroscopic Properties of Quantum Dots
via Energy Transfer and Charge Transfer Interactions: Concepts and Applications. Nano
Today 2016, 11, 98–121.
(40) Selvin, P. R.; Hearst, J. E. Luminescence Energy Transfer Using a Terbium Chelate:
Improvements on Fluorescence Energy Transfer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1994, 91, 10024–
10028.
(41) Hildebrandt, N.; Spillmann, C. M.; Algar, W. R.; Pons, T.; Stewart, M. H.; Oh, E.; Susumu,
K.; Díaz, S. A.; Delehanty, J. B.; Medintz, I. L. Energy Transfer with Semiconductor
Quantum Dot Bioconjugates: A Versatile Platform for Biosensing, Energy Harvesting, and
Other Developing Applications. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 536–711.
(42) Bohren, C. F.; Huffman, D. R. Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles,
Willey-VCH: New York. 1998, 541.
(43) Midelet, J.; El-Sagheer, A. H.; Brown, T.; Kanaras, A. G.; Débarre, A.; Werts, M. H. V.
Spectroscopic and Hydrodynamic Characterisation of DNA-Linked Gold Nanoparticle
Dimers in Solution Using Two-Photon Photoluminescence. ChemPhysChem 2018, 19, 827–
836.
(44) Deželić, G.; Kratohvil, J. P. Determination of Size of Small Particles by Light Scattering.
Experiments on Ludox Colloidal Silica. Kolloid-Z. 1960, 173, 38–48.