Date post: | 19-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | tiara-loving |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
NASG for Relief Settings
Consultation on Reproductive Health Technologies for Crises Settings
PATH & Women's Commission for Refugee Women and Children
May 13-14, 2008
Suellen Miller, CNM, PhDAssociate PRofessor
UCSF, Dept Ob/Gyn & Reproductive Sciences
PASG
• Did not make statistically significant difference in mortality and morbidity for lower body trauma patients (all ages, all dxs.) in urban settings with trauma centers
• Use of PASG for obstetrical hemorrhage:– ONLY 6 cases reported– NO comparative trials
NASG
• Light-weight, reusable
• Lower body counter pressure
• Decreases bleeding• Reverses shock• May contribute to
decreased morbidity and mortality
3 way stretch neoprene (wet suit material) Industrial strength VelcroFoam pressure ball over uterus
THERAPEUTIC EFFECTS OF ANTISHOCK GARMENT
• Efficient, simple & safe circumferential counterpressure
RESUSCITATION OF CENTRAL CIRCULATION
• Results in translocation of up to 30% of total blood volume from lower body to core
REDUCES HEMORRHAGE IN LOWER BODY
• Decrease in arterial perfusion pressure to the uterus, comparable to ligation of the internal iliac arteries.
• Overcomes pressure in capillary and venous system (15-25 mm Hg.), reduction of transmural pressure, vessel radius and flow.
USES• Stabilizes patient while evaluating,
transporting, or preparing for definitive surgical treatment.
• Can be safely and comfortably used up to 48 hours.
• May arrest bleeding and avoid surgical intervention.
• May decrease need for or number of blood transfusions
• During delays, such as waiting for interventional radiology
NASG
Obstetric Hemorrhage
What NASG Does NOT DO
Does not avert the necessity for evaluation
• to identify cause of shock
• to manage fluid and blood replacement
• to provide appropriate therapy for coagulopathy
Little Experience with NASG
• 206: Egypt (results published)
• Results being analyzed
• 540: Egypt II
• 580: Nigeria
• 1126 women treated with the NASG to date
Variable Pre (n= 158) NASG (n=206) P Value
Median estimated blood loss at study entry
750.0 (750, 2000)
975.0 (500, 3000)
<0.001
Median blood loss in drape
500 (0, 2400) 250 (0, 900) <0.001
Severe morbidity & mortality
5 (3.2%) 2 (1%) 0.320
Egypt: 364 Women
•50% lower median measured blood loss in the drape, 68% decrease in morbidity and mortality
Median Pulse Recovery Times from Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis
Median time from study entry to first pulse < 100 in minutes (95% confidence interval)*
Study Group
Pre-intervention (N=106)
NASG (N=145)
Pulse at admission < 120 150 minutes (117 – 183)
45 minutes (36-54)
Pulse at admission >= 120* 240 minutes (161-319)
170 minutes (120-220)
* Log Rank Test adjusted for pulse at admission = 21.20, p=0.000
Findings Promising
• Clinically promising: faster recovery, shorter time of oxygen deprivation, lower blood loss THAN standard treatment
• Statistically significant on PROXY indicators
• OUTCOMES OF INTEREST: Mortality and Morbidity, not statistically significant
• Lower quality design, PRE/POST
Lack of Evidence for Crisis Settings
• To date, these results have all been obtained at tertiary care facilities with access to surgery, blood and sufficient supplies, anesthesiologists, etc.– Currently testing whether application at
a clinic prior to transfer will affect outcomes
Applicability for Relief Settings
• Easy to use
• Training for application, management and removal just a few hours
• Can stabilize patients for transport to a referral facility
Barriers to Use in Relief Settings
• Institutional capacity (tested in tertiary centers)– NASG is first aid - not definitive treatment– Facilities must be able to provide
• Oxygen• Normal Saline• Blood• Uterotonics and other medicines• Surgery/anesthesia
– NASG buys time, but patients still need to be monitored, so adequate staffing, essential drugs and equipment are important
• Provider training and retraining is required, new staff must constantly be trained
Barriers cont.
• Referral protocols
– Referral hospitals that will receive referred patients must first be trained and proficient
– Patients need to be sent to the correct facility– If referral protocol is not correctly
implemented, the patient’s greatest risk is improper removal of the NASG by untrained staff
– Protocols for garment cleaning and return or exchange need to be established
Barriers cont.• Community acceptance
– Patient compliance varies by site– Patient education for life-threatening situations is difficult
and problematic
Barriers cont.
• Care and maintenance
– Highly correlated with the lifespan of the NASG– Adequate supply of clean water required– Not difficult, but must be done properly; not intuitive,
needs training, re-training and support– Cleaning staff need to be trained to properly clean,
fold, and store
• Time lost due to clean ones not available• Time lost due to improper folding
NIH/GATES Collaboration: UCSF, WHO/RHR, CREP, UTH,
UZ
• Randomized Cluster Trial
• Zambia and Zimbabwe
• Standard Treatment (uterotonics/IVs) and Application of NASG at midwifery-led peripheral clinics or Standard Treatment
• Transport to Tertiary Care Hospital where all women receive NASG
• Sample size large enough to demonstrate 50% decrease in M&M
• Brees C, Hensleigh PA, Miller S, Pelligra R. (2004). A non-inflatable anti shock garment for obstetric hemorrhage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 87 (2), 119-124, 2004.•*Miller, S, Hamza, S, Bray E, Gipson R, Nada, K, Fathalla, M, Mourad, M. et al. First Aid for Obstetrical Hemorrhage: The Pilot Study of the Non-pneumatic Anti-Shock Garment (NASG) in Egypt. British Journal of Obstet Gynaecol, 113(4): p. 424-9, 2006.• Miller, S., Turan, JM, Ojengbede A, Ojengbede, O, Fathalla, M, Morhason-Bello, IO, Mourad, M, Galandanci, H, Hamza, S, Awaal, M, Akinwuntan, A, Mohammed AI, McDonough, L, Dau, K, Butrick, E, and Hensleigh, P. The Pilot Study of the Non-pneumatic Anti-Shock Garment (NASG) in Women with Severe Obstetric Hemorrhage: Combined Results from Egypt and Nigeria. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 94(S3), ps43-s44. 2006•* Miller, S & Hensleigh, P. Non-pneumatic Anti-shock Garment for Obstetric Hemorrhage.Book Chapter, in International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) Book, Postpartum Hemorrhage: New Thoughts, New Approaches, Editors: C. B-lynch, A. LaLonde, L. West,. Sapiens Publications, UK. 2006•* Miller, S, Ojengbede A, Turan J, Ojengbede O, Butrick E, Hensleigh, P. Anti-Shock Garments for Obstetric Hemorrhage. Current Women’s Health Reviews, 3(1), 3-11, 2006.•* Miller, S, Turan, JM, Dau, K, Fathalla M, Mourad M, Sutherland, T, Hamza, S. et al. Decreasing Maternal Mortality from Hypovolemic Shock in Low Resource Settings: the Non-pneumatic Anti-Shock Garment (NASG). Global Public Health Journal, 2(2);110-24, 2006.
• Thank you…..
• Questions???