National Center for Accessible Information Technology in Education

Sheryl Burgstahler, Ph. D., Co-Director

Terry Thompson, Technical Specialist

Distance Learning: Policies & Practices that Promote Accessible Design

Sheryl Burgstahler, Ph. D.Director, DO-IT, AccessSTEMCo-Director, AccessIT University of Washington

Sponsors of DL Courses

Postsecondary institutions K-12 schools Online learning organizations Employee training of businesses & non-profit organizations

DL Methods & Tools On-Site Instruction Internet-Based Communication Printed Materials Telephone Conferences Video Conferences Web Pages Video/Multimedia Presentationswww.washington.edu/doit/Brochures/Technology/distance.learn.html

DL has potential advantages for students who:

Are shy, less confident learners Are slow readers, learners Are poor writers/spellers Learn in multiple ways Live in rural areas Are interested in specialized topics Have time, schedule, or location constraints

Are home-bound Are deaf or blind or have low vision

DL Access Challenges for people with

Blindness Other Visual Impairments Specific Learning Disabilities

Mobility Impairments Hearing Impairments Speech Impairments Seizure Disorders

Distance Learning Literature

Disability issues are rarely mentioned. “Increasing access to educational opportunity,” a common goal, usually refers to reaching out to people who are off-campus, live in remote areas, have limited schedules.

If limitations of access at the user end are considered at all, they generally deal with computer/network capacity.

Many DL program websites pose accessibility barriers.

Few programs have policies that address disability-related accessibility issues.

Universal Design“the design of products and environments to be usable by all people, to the greatest extent possible, without the need for adaptation or specialized design”, Ron Mace, Center for Universal Design, North Carolina State University

Problem Solution

Computer AssistiveAccesstechnology

Web Universalaccess design

Need for: Universal design (proactive) & accommodations (reactive)

Policies & procedures that address both

Web Accessibility WAI’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelineswww.w3.org/WAI/

Access Board (Section 508) Standardswww.access-board.gov/ sec508/508standards.htm

Example: Universal Design of Video/Multimedia Presentation Videotaped with captions in mind Large, clear captions Designed so that key content is spoken as well as demonstrated visually

Audio-described version available

www.washington.edu/doit/Brochures/Technology/vid_sensory.html

Universal Design of DL Benefits People with disabilities with differences in attention/perception with situational limitations whose first language is not the one in which the course is taught

with older equipment using different web browsers using handheld display units & other new technology

…

Justification for Accessible Design unethical to bar some eligible participants from program access

legislation mandates program accessibility

applying accessible design is a best practice for all students

costly redesign may be required when a student with a disability enrolls in an inaccessible course

Examples: DL Accessibility Policies California Community Colleges, 1999

Michigan Virtual University: Standards for Quality Online Courses— technology, usability, accessibility, & instructional design

Reference (in press) Article: The Development of Accessibility Indicators for Distance Learning Programs

by Sheryl Burgstahler Research in Learning TechnologyALT-J

Research Question What are program-level policies and practices related to delivering courses that are fully accessible to students with disabilities and what are examples of each?

Research Steps draft list of DLP accessibility indicators

collect examples of applications of the

indicators in DL programs apply the indicators to UW DL program gather input from DL programs to refine items on the list, & encourage them to adopt the indicators.

DLP Accessibility Indicators for:

Students, potential students (#1-5) DL designers (#6, 7) DL instructors (#8) DL program evaluators (#9, 10)

DLP Accessibility Indicator 1

The DL home page is accessible to individuals with disabilities (e.g., adheres to Section 508, WCAG, or institutional accessible-design guidelines/standards).

University of Wisconsin Continuing Education & Outreach http://www.wisc.edu/wiscinfo/outreach/

DLP Accessibility Indicator 2

A statement about the DL program's commit-ment to accessible design for all potential students, including those with disabilities, is included prominently in appropriate publica-tions & websites, along with contact informa-tion for reporting inaccessible design features.

Virtual Classroom, Mt. San Antonio College http://vclass.mtsac.edu/: “This page is design-ed to be accessible to all users. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact …”

DLP Accessibility Indicator 3

A statement about how DL students with disabilities can request accommodations is in appropriate publications & web pages.

University of South Carolina Student Guidebook: Policies and Procedures for Distanced Education Classes http://www.uscupstate.edu/academics/distance/guidebook_students.pdf

DLP Accessibility Indicator 3, cont.

Students requiring accommodations for disabilities or learning needs are advised to contact the Office of Disability Services (864) 503-5199. The staff works to ensure accessibility for all university programs, services, & activities in compliance with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 & the Americans with Disabilities Act. Services offered include priority registration, test proctoring, classroom adaptation, sign language interpreters, readers, & note takers.

DLP Accessibility Indicator 4

A statement about how people can obtain alternate formats of printed materials is included in publications.

University of Minnesota Independent and Distance Learning Course Catalogue: “This publication is available in alternative formats on request. Call One Stop Student Services (800-400-8636) for assistance.”

DLP Accessibility Indicator 5

The online & other course materials of DL courses are accessible to individuals with disabilities.

Test compliance with adopted standards, guidelines

DLP Accessibility Indicator 6

Publications & web pages for DL course design-ers include: a) a statement of the program's commitment to accessibility, b) guidelines/ standards regarding accessibility, & c) resources.

University of Iowa’s Accessibility Standards for Web Resources http://cio.uiowa.edu/Policy/ WebAccessibility.htm: “The University of Iowa is committed to providing equal access to information, programs, & activities through its technologies, web pages, services & resources…

DLP Accessibility Indicator 7

Accessibility issues are covered in regular DL course designer training.

University of Washington DL designers includes a session on legal & technical accessibility issues and Section 508 standards.

DLP Accessibility Indicator 8

Publications & web pages for DL instructors include a) a statement of the DL program's commitment to accessibility, b) guidelines/ standards regarding accessibility, & c) resources.

University of Maryland University Accessibility in Distance Education: A Resource for Faculty in Online Teaching http://www.umuc.edu/ade/: “The Accessibility in Distance Education (ADE) Web site focuses on helping faculty develop accessible online learning materials for people with disabilities. It is divided into five major sections, ...

DLP Accessibility Indicator 9

Accessibility issues are covered in training sessions for instructors.

Cal State San Marcos Web Accessibility: Applying ADA Principles to Online Teaching & Learning http://www.csusm. edu/ accessibility/onlinecourses/ includes content & resources from a faculty training session.

DLP Accessibility Indicator 10

A system is in place to monitor the accessibility of courses, and, on the basis of this evaluation, the program takes actions to improve the accessibility of specific courses & to update information & training given to potential stu-dents, students, course designers, & instructors.

UW applies quality assurance tests to courses before delivered. Included is accessibility review. Barriers to accessibility recorded & removed in course updates.

UW Implementation Goal

To make distance learning courses at the University of Washington accessible to all students and instructors.

UW Project Partners Extension Online Learning Access Technology Lab (ATL) DO-IT (Disabilities, Opportunities, Internetworking and Technology)

Disabled Student Services

Campus-wide Efforts ATL works with Educational Technology Group to promote accessible tools & course materials

ATL stand-alone accessibility presentations; integration of accessibility into mainstream Web & other technology courses

Web accessibility campus Web page established AccessWeb discussion list established & group began meeting

UW Distance Learning, a Work in Progress

Distance learning program established 1912 (now Online Learning)

1995 first course using the Internet(Burgstahler & Coombs, employed accessible design)

200+ courses serving 10,000+ annually

Initial State:DL program included policy/ procedures statements on website regarding reasonable accommodations for students with disabilities

Technology: Course delivery system developed with campus Computing & Communications (C&C) & suite of course tools developed by campus Educational Technology Group & C&C

Progress with UW DL Determined that UW policy of commitment to nondiscrimination & reasonable accommodation (Section 504 & ADA) was enough to justify development of accessibility guidelines & efforts

Training provided to DL program staff; buy-in secured at management & implementation levels; responsibility assigned

Began to systemically change approach from accommodation to universal design + accommodation

UW DL Progress, cont.

Identified places on DL program Web pages to reaffirm UW policy

All but one indicator implemented Accessibility content included in DL Certificate Program & in Introduction to Web publishing course (accessible design required in the final project)

UW DL Program Rewards

Compliance with laws Cleaner, better functioning pages

Improved ease of use for all students and instructors

Challenges

Faculty education/buy-in Resources Technology constraints Specific courses

Outreach to 16 DL Programs

.5 staff, one year Beginning: 3 DLP indicators implemented per school; ending 4.1 per school

Changes at 3 schools accounted for 80% of changes

Results suggest:Incorporating accessibility considerations in program policies, procedures, & communications:

requires efforts related to students, course designers, instructors, & evaluators

requires approval & implementation at variety of levels

becomes easier once some initial accessibility policies, procedures, & communications have been implemented

is an ongoing process that may be implemented in incremental steps

Resources

www.washington.edu/accessitQ&As, Case Studies, Promising Practices

AccessDLwww.washington.edu/doit/Resources/

accessdl.html