NatureSociety(Singapore) ! ConservationCommittee ... on the STB... · 2014-09-17 · "(See"the"NSS"...

1

Nature Society (Singapore)

Conservation Committee

Report on the Singapore Tourism Board (STB) Project at Mandai

(This document is endorsed by the Council of The Nature Society)

Preface to Nature Society’s 2007 Report on the Mandai Lake Road Development

Nature Society (NSS) had submitted a feedback report on the projected development to Singapore Tourism Board (STB) and National Parks (NParks) in 2007 when the plan was first announced. We were invited to a meeting at that time -‐-‐-‐-‐ to be briefed on their plans and to get our verbal feedback. The Orchid Garden at the edge of the Night Safari area was at that time not in the plan for the development. Although submitted in 2007, NSS’ concerns still hold today.

At that meeting, we were told that they will be using the project areas to lure and benefit visitors to the Zoo and to effect more than a daily visit. The plan was to create a resort with accommodation on an ecologically sustainable framework so that these visitors could have a few days and nights imbibing the jungle atmosphere of the Zoo’s environs -‐-‐-‐ apart from just seeing captive animals. They talked about having nature-‐oriented recreational facilities as well as educational activities. There was no mention about extending the Night Safari nor any mention of transferring the Bird Park from Jurong to any of the state lands at Mandai Lake Road -‐-‐-‐ high-‐profile suggested uses that were reported recently in the mass media.

These suggestions (Safari extension & Bird Park) if carried out will pose a serious threat to the integrity of the Central Catchment Nature Reserves (CCNR). Pertaining to these suggestions, there are three major issues of ecological concern:

1) Importance of the Project Areas as Buffer Zone: The non-‐official buffer for the northern sector of the CCNR, east & west of the Mandai Lake Road, will be seriously jeopardized. The northern sector of CCNR is already in bad shape being extremely fragmented. The buffer here consists of the greenery or forested state lands east & west of the Mandai Lake Road as well as the forested MINDEF area to the west of Mandai Track 15. (Track 15 is no longer on the map; it runs in from Mandai Lake Road, at the military gate, to the MINDEF Firing Range.) Within the state land to the west of Mandai Lake Road is an elongated grassy patch with patches of

2

secondary forest at the edges. The state land to the east of Mandai Lake Road consists of phased-‐out orchard land now densely wooded with wild trees and undergrowth, and is contiguous to the nature reserve at the sector to the east of the Road, (which is shaped like a triangle with the apex jutting into Upper Seletar Reservoir). There are many roles to an ecological buffer, but one of these in relation to the area of our concern is the role of buffer against wind-‐throw, a violent example of which was seen in the wind-‐throw several years ago in the CCNR sector north of the Upper Seletar Reservoir, which is very close to the area of our concern. The wrecking did not reach the forest immediately to the east & west of Mandai Lake Road, but who knows what a similar event or a more violent one may do if it occurs again -‐-‐-‐ especially when the existing forest here are thinned or wiped out by development.

2) Importance of the Project Areas as Wildlife Corridor The areas, east & west of the Mandai Lake Road, as a whole serve as a green corridor for wildlife movement from the north-‐western sector to the north-‐eastern sector of the CCNR (including the isolated nature reserve area north of Mandai Road) and vice versa -‐-‐-‐ across Mandai Lake Road. The opening up of these areas for extensive development will seriously jeopardized this existing green corridor. There are of course many ecological impacts that can be mentioned, but if they are going to have an extension of the Night Safari into the area and a Bird Park (most probably a larger one) , one serious problem will come with the erection of extensive fences. Right now, the Night Safari has an extensive fence around it except for the shoreline, and if extended further into the state land, will definitely constrained more adversely the movement of wildlife along this existing green corridor. The same situation will apply to the creation of a Bird Park, which will involve clearing or thinning of the forest and more fences, especially with the creation of a large flight-‐in aviary like that in the existing Bird Park or a larger one.

3) The Importance of the Project Areas themselves as Biodiversity-‐Rich Nature Areas. This is highlighted by a biodiversity survey commissioned by STB around 2006/2007. It is heartening that the authorities had announced in the public media that there will be an EIA, which will have a wider scope than a biodiversity impact assessment (BIA) or survey. The recommendation of the STB’s BIA (2007) is best to leave the projected areas for development untouched because of the richness of their biodiversity, which includes species like the endangered Sunda Pangolin, Grey-‐headed Fish Eagle, Straw-‐headed Bulbul, etc. (See the NSS report). It is now about 7 years down the road since that STB’s survey and since no development has been going on there from that time, except for some military facilities like training shades, the greenery there has become more mature, denser, and even grown larger, and as a such they may probably be richer in wildlife now. NSS is not just concerned with the ecological impact of development into the nature reserve zone but also the impact on the existing wildlife using the areas outside and contiguous to the nature reserve as well -‐-‐-‐ either

3

as nesting/breeding or foraging grounds. Of note is a natural stream (uncanalised) to the west of Mandai Lake Road and bordered on both banks by belts of trees, running right through the project area from the nature reserve. Aquatic/semi-‐aquatic life-‐forms, some of them typical of wooded streams, will be adversely affected by development.

Dr Ho Hua Chew

Vice-‐Chairman, Conservation Committee

Nature Society (Singapore)

4

I) Introduction

This report is formulated based on information provided by STB in two meetings on an eco-‐tourism project south of the Mandai Road area and on both sides of the Mandai Lake Road. In these meetings we gather that STB is looking at two parcels of land contiguous to the Central Catchment Reserve and these are:

1) Mandai Road Patch: An wedge-‐shape patch of about 15 ha -‐-‐-‐ bounded by Mandai Road, Mandai Lake Road and the boundary of the Western Catchment Reserve; and

2) Mandai Track-‐15 Patch: An elongated patch of about 18 ha -‐-‐-‐ between Mandai Track 15 and the Western Catchment Reserve up to the military firing range.

The total comes to about 33 ha -‐-‐-‐ all of which are contiguous to but outside the boundary of the Nature Reserve.

STB has not provided any detailed plans for the use of these areas except that they will be used for tourism and that the project will take into account and be sensitive to the biodiversity and ecology of these areas.

STB has carried a biodiversity survey of these areas and we have been given a summary of the results. The results are very impressive and together with our field and map study of the area, we are extremely perturbed with the development project. We have arrived at the following conclusions and proposals, which will be spelled out below.

II) Summary of STB’s Wildlife Survey (February 2007)

This is given in the Executive Summary of the STB’s survey report, which states: “Of the selected faunal groups, 252 species of animals have been recorded within the survey zone so far. This involves 18 mammals, 114 birds, 24 reptiles, 15 amphibians, 21 fish, 37 butterflies and 23 odonates (damselflies/dragonflies). A total of 55 Locally Threatened animal species were recorded and this included the Globally Threatened Sunda Pangolin, Grey-‐headed Fish-‐Eagle, Red-‐crowned Barbet and the Straw-‐headed Bulbul. Of the animal species recorded, 43 may be considered Forest Specialists”

“The Seletar Zone, despite its relative small area, is an important part of the Central Catchment Nature Reserve. More than 20% of the animals recorded are considered Locally Threatened. ”

We accept the results of this biodiversity survey report and we also agree totally with its conservation recommendation, which states that “it is best to leave area untouched.”

5

III) Serious Concerns from a Wider Ecological Framework

Our concerns do not stem from merely on-‐site study of the ecological situation but also from a study of the wider ecological framework, covering the situation of the Central Catchment Reserve as a whole. This is also to take long-‐term view of the ecological health and viability of the Reserve given the foreseeable impacts of the STB’s project.

A) The Fragmentation of the Forest

Please refer to Google Map 1 attached.

The forest is seriously in bad ecological shape due to severe fragmentation over the decades caused by the creation of golf courses, roads, pipelines, expansion of the existing reservoirs, etc. In fact, the whole of the forest Nature Reserve are now fragmented into roughly 7 patches, each standing in isolation from the rest through gaps in the forest cover. What we have now is what ecologists call ‘habitat islands’ rather than one homogeneous, integrated and compact forest. Fragmentation brings about population isolation among the various species as well as the well-‐studied phenomenon of the edge-‐effects. These 7 patches are:

1) Bukit Timah Forest -‐-‐-‐-‐ to the west of the BKE;

2) MacRitchie Forest -‐-‐-‐ bordering Lornie Road;

3) Peirce Forest -‐-‐-‐-‐ between Upper/Lower Peirce Reservoir and MacRitchie Reservoir;

4) Seletar Forest -‐-‐-‐ between Upper/Lower Peirce Reservoir and Upper Seletar Reservoir;

5) Mandai Forest -‐-‐-‐ south of Mandai Road to Upper Seletar Reservior;

6) Asrama Forest -‐-‐-‐ strip parallel to and north of Mandai Road.

7) Mandai Zoo & Night Safari -‐-‐-‐ a degraded area within the Reserve and separated from the rest of the Reserve’s forest by the Mandai Lake Road and the Night Safari’s fence.

Edge-‐effects involves loss of humidity, loss of interior cooler habitat, invasion and predation by alien and non-‐forest species, introduction of diseases from urban zones to the forest wildlife, which have no immunity or resistance to them, etc. (A standard accessible text on this subject is Essentials of Conservation Biology, in particular Part 3, Ch. 9; by Richard B. Primack; Sinauer Associates.)

6

B) Forest Degradation

Apart from the overall fragmentation, we have further degradation within these forest patches themselves caused by inappropriate uses, which involves clearance of the forest cover within the boundary of the Central Catchment Reserve to a greater or lesser extent. Some prominent examples are:

1) The Zoo and the Night Safari, which degraded about 89 ha of compact forest;

2) The recently-‐created huge covered-‐reservoir at Upper Peirce, which cleared completely about 11 ha of forest;

3) The Nee Soon Firing Range, which cleared 20 ha of forest that was a part of the remaining rare swamp-‐forest in Singapore harbouring many rare and nationally endangered wildlife;

C) General Conclusions Drawn

Given this overall situation, it is indeed very alarming for the future survival of our forest wildlife. If we are sensitive to the ecological dimension of the situation, we are inevitably led to the conclusion that:

1) There is an urgent need to fill in the gaps and to provide officially-‐designated buffer areas for the forest Reserves that are not subjected to future developments. So far the setting up of the Hindhede Park (9.5 ha.) and the Dairy Farm Park (63 ha) by National Parks, both as integrated buffers to the Bukit Timah Nature Reserve, is a move in the right direction. The situation is now more urgent on the northern flank of the Central Catchment Reserve, where the STB sites are located -‐-‐-‐ as the gaps there are extremely severe;

2) There should be compensation for the development use of the Reserve land, which for the prominent cases sited above comes to about 120 ha. The creation of Hindhede Park and Dairy Farm Park, both amounting to about 72.5 ha., compensates to some extent.

3) There is an urgent need to stop any more development within and at off-‐boundary contiguous areas;

4) And to incorporate officially, as integrated buffers of the Central Catchment Nature Reserve, all undeveloped areas between its boundary and the surrounding roads -‐-‐-‐ Upper Thomson, Mandai, the BKE, and the PIE. The forest Nature Reserves comes to about only 2000 ha minus the waterbodies and this is relatively small and fragile compared to other such reserves in the region. Because of fragmentation, the width of many portions of the forest at the Reserve boundary are extremely thin and lacking in interior habitat. The use of these

7

buffers should be like what has been conceptualized and implemented at Hindhede and Dairy Farm where no built structures are allowed apart from a visitor centres, hides, rain-‐shelters, etc. and also where for example cycling, which are prohibited within the Reserves, can be allowed along designated routes.

IV) STB Proposed Development Areas

Refer to Google Map 2 & 3 attached.

A) Mandai Road Patch (15 ha)

Although this patch is outside the Reserve’s boundary, it is a highly important unofficial buffer to the Reserve on the north-‐western sector. The forest here is secondary and very dense, comprising mostly of belukar vegetation (e.g. Durian, Rambutan, Fish-‐tail Palm, African Tulip, etc.) Many of the trees are very mature and over time this patch can revert back closer and closer to the state of the original forest through colonization by the typical rainforest species.

Society’s Stand Here: We strongly urge that this patch should be left completely untouched. Our reasons are as follows:

1) Refer to Google Map 3. The use of this patch would cause a greater gap in the connectivity for wildlife between the Reserve’s forest on the eastern side of Mandai Lake Road and the remaining Reserve’s forest on the western side of the Road. Note that the wildlife connectivity along the Reserve’s forest on the eastern side of the Mandai Lake Road has a severe gap at the point opposite the Mandai Orchid Garden and also further down the shoreline, where the road cuts to the very edge of the Reservoir, leaving no green corridor along the stretch here. Also note that the presence of the fenced-‐up Mandai Orchid Garden together with the fenced-‐up Zoo’s compound all the way from the Garden to the Zoo’s gate has already posed an extremely severe obstacle to wildlife connectivity between the forests on the eastern and western side of the Lake Road. For any wildlife, e.g. Pangolin, Leopard Cat, Mouse Deer, Sambar Deer (an escapee, but originally native to Singapore), etc., to cross from one side to the other, they currently can only to do so by crossing the Lake Road in the quieter hours (at dawn or in the night when the traffic is negligible) -‐-‐-‐ but only at the stretch between the Orchid Garden and Mandai Track 15. This is a very short stretch. Crossing at the remaining stretch from Track 15 to Mandai Road is blocked by the presence of the deep monsoon drain along the eastern side of the Lake Road. The use of the remaining unofficial forest buffers on both sides of the Lake Road would entail that this available fording-‐point (across the road obstacle) would become more degraded and disturbed, which most probably will result in the complete isolation of the wildlife in these forest fragments.

8

2) The STB has proposed that it will preserve the older trees here as much as possible but this will degrade the buffer considerably as a forest ecosystem or habitat. The result will be a parkland landscape, where the variety of habitat niche in such forest, each harbouring its own typical wildlife, will be lost. As it is with its profusion of shrubs and trees, it is provides an extra foraging ground and habitat for many of the Reserve’s wildlife. Examples of the wildlife that will be adversely affected with the forest tidied up to a parkland habitat are all the forest frogs, bird species such as the Chestnut-‐winged Babbler, Rufous-‐tailed Tailorbird, Greater Coucal, etc., mammals such as the Mouse Deer, Pangolin, etc. Moreover, if STB seriously intends to keep all the mature or big trees standing here, then opening up the buffer to create spaces for necessary structures here will be very limited as there are plenty of such trees around. In this regard, it is better to keep it completely untouched.

3) This area is an important buffer with respect to a pair of the Grey-‐headed Fish Eagle that haunts the Reserve’s forest at this corner. They fish in the Reservoir and resorted to the tall trees here to eat their catch and rest or roost in the night. Although there is no record so far of their nesting here, it is probable their nest is located in the area. The Fish Eagle is a nationally rare and endangered species and are limited in their distribution to the large water-‐bodies in Singapore. If this area is used, the activities and the noises that will inevitably occur will be very disturbing to the pair and other wildlife here as well. (Canoeing in the reservoir here should be totally disallowed.)

B) Mandai Track 15 Patch (18 ha)

Refer to Google Map 2 & 3

The area to be used is on the eastern side of Mandai Track 15 and also contiguous to the Reserve’s boundary. The patch is less dense in forest cover with open grassy patches closer to the Track, but on the whole the forest is in the process of regenerating after the phasing out of farming and villages.

Society’s Stand Here: Refer to the Google Map 3. Again we strongly urge that it should be left untouched to allow for the regeneration of the forest here to provide a broader and stronger buffer. Eco-‐friendly development, if it is properly done, could and should be pushed more into the Jalan Kwok Min area, between Mandai Track 15 and the BKE. The reasons for this proposal are:

1) This unofficial buffer for the Reserve is pretty thin and there is an urgent need to broaden it. The Orchid Garden has destroyed a big chunk of the buffer here. Although degraded, the forest here can recover over time and this can be accelerated by artificial regeneration of the native species. There is a natural flowing stream running through the area

9

and such a stream running through forested areas are now very rare in Singapore. The regeneration of the forest cover here would enhance the biodiversity of the stream and bring it back to its original forest eco-‐systemic condition. The use of area for development would entail that the edge-‐effects will increase, such as the further increase in temperature and lost of humidity and the resulting decrease in cooler, shadier and quieter interior forest habitat, which is critical for shade-‐loving plants and wildlife that prefers a cooler micro-‐climate, such as forest amphibians (e.g. Copper-‐cheeked Frog, Black-‐eyed Litter Frog), forest butterflies (e.g. Saturn, Common Posy, Tawny Palmfly.), forest reptiles (e.g. Marbled Forest Gecko), forest mammals (e.g. Blyth’s Horseshoe Bat), etc. Clearing the undergrowth and leaving just the more mature trees standing will not help in alleviating this forseeable degradation.

2) It will also cause further degradation and disturbance of the only available fording-‐stretch across the road obstacle for wildlife between the Reserve’s forest on the eastern and western side of the Lake Road. The obstacles to wildlife connectivity along the eastern side of the Lake Road has been pointed in Section A above. On this western side, the existing obstacles are the Orchid Garden and the Zoo’s fence along the Lake Road, stretching from the Garden all the way to the Zoo’s gate. There is also the deep monsoon drain stretching for about 80m from the entrance of Lake Road to the point roughly opposite the entrance of Track 15. As is emphasized above, the only available fording–stretch across the road is the very short stretch from Track 15 to the northern boundary of the Orchid Garden. The implementation of STB’s project extending along both sides of the road would cause this fording-‐stretch to become extremely degraded and wildlife connectivity will be seriously jeopardized in this northern sector of the Central Catchment Reserve.

C) Leopard Cat (See the photo attached)

We would like to highlight here a very important consideration for the Society’s position and argument presented above, and this is the fact of the presence of the Leopard Cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in the area. The Leopard Cat is a rare and endangered mammal species as well as the only wild cats extant in Singapore, the Tiger and the Leopard being already extinct long ago. Moreover, it is a very beautiful animal.

Residents in the area close to Track 15 in the late 1960s were aware of a population of Leopard Cat in the area. (Information obtained from a Society’s member Mr.Yeo Suay Hwee, who grew up here and who is also a member of the Society’s Vertebrate Study Group.) Also, on 11th June 2001 a roadkill Leopard Cat was found along the south side of the Mandai Road, not far from the junction with Mandai Lake Road. It is interpreted here that the animal was actually attempting to cross the Mandai Road either from north to south, or from south to north.

10

The Mandai area is one of only two known areas where the species exists at the margins of the Central Catchment Nature Reserve; the other area being the Watten Estate / Adam Park / Hillcrest area where there was a sighting on 6th July 2002, but of course this area is fragmented from the Central Catchment by the PIE. Thus the animals encountered here at the Mandai Area are the only ones not totally fragmented from the Reserve. The fact that there is a Leopard Cat roadkill here only about 6 years ago indicates the need of this rare and endangered species as well as other ground-‐moving animals to move and forage across existing roads, tracks and forest edges and buffers.

Any development projects to be eco-‐friendly must take this point into serious account. A highly important consideration for such a development -‐-‐-‐ especially when it is contiguous to a Nature Reserve -‐-‐-‐ is to ensure that the existing wildlife connectivity of the forest is not jeopardized. In fact, in other developed countries, conservation efforts and provisions will be made to facilitate such connectivity by removing the obstacles, closing the gaps and creating green corridors through planting or natural regeneration of the degraded patches. An excellent example of such an effort in Singapore is the MND project to create an eco-‐link between the Bukit Timah and the Central Catchment Reserve -‐-‐-‐ recently announced. More of such efforts should be carried out.

Other known populations are at Pulau Ubin (exceedingly rare) and Pulau Tekong (rare, and extremely localised) as well as another roadkill at Jalan Bahar.

V) Nature Society’s Proposals

Alternative 1

Refer to Google Map 5

We strongly urge that the whole project be located elsewhere -‐-‐-‐-‐ in the beautiful, semi-‐natural areas of the countryside. A good example of such an area to look at is the undeveloped area between Yio Chu Kang Road and the Lower Seletar Reservoir, where there is a variety of landscape making the area very scenic -‐-‐-‐ woodlands, scrublands, marshes and a large waterbody (the Lower Seletar Reservoir.)

The main reason is that this northern sector of the Central Catchment Reserve forest as well as the unofficial buffer areas around are already rather in a fragmented and degraded state due to the creation of Mandai Road, the Mandai Lake Road, the Orchid Garden and its fencing, the Zoo and its fencing, the military firing range, etc. This ecologically unhealthy situation will be exacerbated by the STB project with an additional influx of infrastructures and vehicular traffic, accompanied with more visitor activities, noises and lightening up of the

11

forest. Thus, what is left of the remaining undeveloped areas outside the Reserve boundary should be left untouched and designated as official buffers, like what has been done for the Bukit Timah Nature Reserve by the setting up of the Hindhede and the Dairy Farm Park. Efforts should be made to reforest the open areas to strengthen the buffers instead of opening it up for eco-‐tourism with a residential dimension.

As to use of these areas for eco-‐tourism, we are skeptical of its potential for success. Given that the site is ecologically sensitive, the onus is on STB to show that its project will definitely succeed to bring in the targeted number of tourists. How certain is STB of this? If the project fails like what happens at the Tang Dynasty City, Dragon World, etc., then STB has caused a further degradation of the forest here jeopardizing the future survival of the Reserve’s wildlife with little to compensate in return.

The whole of the forest Nature Reserves, let alone the 30-‐plus ha. area proposed by STB, is simply too small and lacking in conspicuous or charismatic species to provide a basis for sustained eco-‐tourism attraction on an international scale. The interesting mammal species to be found there such as the Leopard Cat, the Pangolin, the Mouse deer, the Flying Lemur, etc., are all pretty small and are difficult to spot. (Please refer to the Appendix for more of our comments on this subject.)

However, a small visitor and/or field-‐study centre could be set up here to cater to researchers, students, nature-‐lovers and Zoo visitors who may be interested to know and to take up the challenge of spotting the non-‐captive native wildlife of our forest. The only other such centre for the Central Catchment Reserve is located far away on the eastern sector -‐-‐-‐ off Upper Thomson Road.

Alternative 2

Refer to Google Map 4

However, if locating the project elsewhere is not possible, we strongly urge that both the sites (a total of 30-‐plus ha) should be located to the west of Mandai Track 15, at the Jalan Kwok Min area -‐-‐-‐ i.e. between Track 15 and BKE and south of the Mandai Lake Road to the Firing Range.

The proposed alternative here has the advantage that it is a single site, and does not have Mandai Lake Road running through it, with the stream of cars, coaches and buses. The forest here is also secondary. There is sufficient space such that given the area-‐size requirement (30-‐plus ha.), a stretch of forest hugging the BKE can still be left standing, providing together with the broad pipeline setback a comfortable buffer and screen against the BKE.

12

As to the degraded forest to the east of Track 15, STB should use the opportunity to show its eco-‐friendliness by implementing a planting programme as part of the project. Nothing here should be cleared. What is most important is that the available buffer and fording-‐stretch for wildlife traversing the Lake Road will be prevented from further disturbance and degradation and with artificial regeneration could over time be made to recover into healthy forest.

The area would need to be vacated by Mindef. As a rather isolated and small Mindef site, it could and should be easily transferable elsewhere. The presence of the military camp, training facilities, firing range, trundling trucks, soldiers moving around, etc., is glaringly out of keeping with the idea of this being an area of nature-‐themed attractions.

Dated: 30 November 2007

Reference

The Gardens’ Bulletin, Vol. 49, Part 2, Dec. 1997 (Chapter: Mammals, Reptiles and Amphibians of the Nature Reserves of Singapore: Diversity, Abundance & Distribution.)

Acknowledgement:

The Conservation Committee would like to thank the following for their invaluable contributions in the formulation of the justifications & proposals of this report:

Mr. Alan Owyong Mr. Goh Si Gium Prof. Ng Soon Chye Dr. Vilma D’Rozario

Ms. Angie Ng Dr. Geh Min Mr. Nick Baker Mr. Mr. Vina Dharmarajah

Ms Celine Low Dr. Ho Hua Chew Dr. Shawn Lum Mr. Yeo Suay Hwee

Mr. Chan Kwok Wai Dr. Hsu Chia Chi Mr. Simon Chan

Dr. Cheong Loong Fah Ms Margie Hall Mr. Stephen Lau

13

Appendix 1: Some Considerations on the Prospect of Improving the State of Singapore Tourism

At the 16 January 2007 Meeting with STB, the Mandai nature-‐themed tourist venture was introduced as part of the attempts by the STB to achieve its present goals. These goals, set in January 2005, were to double visitor arrivals to 17million and treble tourism receipts to $30billion in the ten-‐year period to 2015, as well as to increase the number of employees in the tourism sector from 150,000 to 250,000. The Nature Society (Singapore) appreciates the importance of these goals, but note that Singapore has been increasing its visitor numbers satisfactorily since 2005 without any new attractions at all. Although the increases have been less than 10% per year (7.4% in 2005, and 9% in 2006, and may only be around 5% in 2007), these increases have occurred without the opening of new attractions. The expansion of Medical and Educational Tourism for instance, the continuing importance of Singapore as a centre for conferences and incentive groups, and the general health of the Asian tourism market, have been helping the tourism sector towards the STB goals.

In the next few years a great many new projects will open, such as the two Integrated Resorts, the Marina Bay Gardens, the F-‐One Racing Circuit, which will catapult visitor numbers towards the achievement of the STB goals. Even well before the opening of the Integrated Resorts, events such as the first night-‐time street-‐circuit Formula One in September 2008, will lead to a massive increase in tourism for 2008. The Marina Reservoir, soon to be completed, will allow for greater number of water-‐sports-‐based events, set excitingly against the city backdrop. The proposed motor sports circuit at Changi will likewise bring in some international or regional events. All of these are likely-‐winners in terms of increasing tourist numbers, appealing to the mainly-‐Asian tourists who come to Singapore, as well as being commercially successful on the basis that they will be supported by Singaporeans.

On the other hand, where Singapore has been least successful in the past is in single-‐themed attractions. Although some of them have been successful, such as the Jurong Bird Park, the Night Safari, the Zoo and Underwater World, others have been totally unsuccessful, e.g. Tang Dynasty City, Dragon World, Fantasy Island, Asian Village, Malay Village. The success is particularly unlikely if the ventures are not going to pull in a local clientele. It might be argued that, because the Mandai development will be a “nature-‐themed” attraction, that it would automatically be successful. However, the fact is that the four successful attractions noted above cover all the angles in terms of fauna-‐attractions, and the proposed Mandai nature-‐themed attraction is aimed at being a “general” nature-‐themed attraction but in an area that is not one of outstanding natural beauty from a tourist’s point of view, or those of a local person. There are no waterfalls, or locations for canopy walks. The area is regenerating, and vitally attractive to local fauna, but not so to tourists or locals. The Mandai Road traffic and the traffic on Mandai Lake Road will impinge on tourist activities, especially since there will have to be a no-‐go-‐to-‐visitors buffer zone on the reservoir edge, which will push visitor activities towards the Mandai Road and Mandai Lake Road sides of the site.

14

The suggestion is that this attraction will be of a “lodge” type, based on rainforest lodges in places such as Costa Rica and Queensland, so that visitors will stay over to gain a full nature experience, rather that use a downtown hotel. But with a downtown so close, and when the genuine nature experience of Mandai will be so limited, this seems unlikely. The forest lacks big and obviously visible species to be attractive to international tourists who have the options of bigger attractions in the neighbouring countries.

In the September 27th Meeting we discussed the fact that perhaps the regeneration of this area towards being a forest, and the existence of fruit trees from farming times, could somehow make this into a “mini-‐Eden-‐Project” in the outdoors, but the interest of this in a region where the real thing is so close by will really be negligible.

Most of the recent and future expansion of tourist numbers in Singapore is coming from the region, from Indonesia, Australia, China, India and Vietnam. In 2003, 72% of visitors are from Asia, 80% from Asia and Oceania combined, while in 2006, 73% of visitors are from Asia and 81% from Asia and Oceana combined. Tourists such as these are not going to want a Singapore-‐style regenerating-‐ forest experience. They can all find more extensive and richer tracts of nature in their own countries, where the nature experience, even with synthetic elements, can truly be “away from it all”.

Already, those of us who take tourists to the Tree Top Walk, built across a low canopy secondary forest area, have to explain why one actually sees so little animal life from it, and why the experience is more that of being a bridge above the canopy, than passing through the canopy.

15

Appendix 2: Maps and Pictures

Map 1: Image shows the fragmented forests in the area.

16

Map 2: The Projected Area to be developed

17

Map 3: Shows the corridor use of wildlife for crossing and the obstacles they encounter

18

Map 4: Indicates a suggested alternative site for development.

19

Map 5: Indicates a suggested alternative site for development.

20

Pic 1 & 2: Roadkill Leopard Cat found along Mandai Road, 11 June 2001

Picture by Charith Pelpola

Date post:	08-Jul-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times

NatureSociety(Singapore) ! ConservationCommittee ... on the STB... · 2014-09-17 · "(See"the"NSS"...

Documents