+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Navy Modeling Activities

Navy Modeling Activities

Date post: 30-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: arvid
View: 31 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Navy Modeling Activities. Presented by Erick Rogers “Ocean Dynamics and Prediction” Branch of the Oceanography Division of the Naval Research Laboratory. Forecasting Systems. Fleet Numerical (official forecasts) Naval Oceanographic Office (official) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
53
Navy Modeling Activities Presented by Erick Rogers “Ocean Dynamics and Prediction” Branch of the Oceanography Division of the Naval Research Laboratory
Transcript
Page 1: Navy Modeling Activities

Navy Modeling Activities

Presented by Erick Rogers“Ocean Dynamics and Prediction” Branch of the Oceanography Division of the Naval Research Laboratory

Page 2: Navy Modeling Activities

Forecasting Systems

Fleet Numerical (official forecasts) Naval Oceanographic Office (official) Naval Research Laboratory

(technology demonstrations, realtime but pre-operational products)

Page 3: Navy Modeling Activities

FNMOC (Fleet Numerical Meteorology and Oceanography Center) (Monterey, CA)

FNMOC wave models: limited to global and regional

Example FNMOC web page

Page 4: Navy Modeling Activities

FNMOC wave products

Example FNMOC product (output from global model)

Page 5: Navy Modeling Activities

FNMOC wave products

Example FNMOC web page (output from one regional model)

Page 6: Navy Modeling Activities

FNMOC wave products

Example FNMOC product (output from one regional model)

Page 7: Navy Modeling Activities

FNMOC meteorological products

Example FNMOC product (surface winds from one regional model)

Page 8: Navy Modeling Activities

NAVO (Naval Oceanographic Office)

NAVO wave models: (officially) limited to sub-regional and coastal applications

Example NAVO web page and graphic from a sub-regional application (SWAN)

Page 9: Navy Modeling Activities

The Naval Research Laboratory

• Navy’s corporate laboratory

• Three campuses:

• Washington DC

• Stennis Space Center, MS

• Monterey, CA

• Basic (6.1) through applied (6.2) research, technology transfer (6.4), technology demonstration

• Primary funding from ONR

• Compete internally for block funding from ONR (very competitive)

• Make up remainder with funding from SPAWAR (6.4) or direct proposals to ONR programs (also very competitive)

Page 10: Navy Modeling Activities
Page 11: Navy Modeling Activities

Circulation modeling at NRL

Example NRL realtime circulation model webpage (Global NCOM)

Page 12: Navy Modeling Activities

Circulation modeling at NRL

Example NRL realtime circulation model graphics (Global NCOM). Potential uses:• search and rescue • spill mitigation

Page 13: Navy Modeling Activities

NRL Oceanography Division, Waves Group

Richard A. Allard (6.4) – Transitions of technologies to operations; rapidly relocatable modeling systems; head of coastal oceanographic modeling Section

James D. Dykes (6.4) – Transitions; Forecast system development; Delft3d implementation/validation; hindcasting; parallel computing; meteorological modeling

Kacey L. Edwards (6.1, 6.2) – Phase-resolved modeling; Nearshore breaking and nonlinear interactions

Y. Larry Hsu (6.4) – Transitions; Delft3d implementations; Navy Standard Surf Model; Lagrangian swell modeling; model validation

Paul Hwang (6.1) – Physical Oceanography; basic processes theoretical research; gravity-capillary waves; air-sea interaction; airborne remote sensing of waves

James M. Kaihatu (6.1, 6.2) – Phase-resolved model development; nearshore breaking and nonlinear interactions; data assimilation; wave-induced circulation; AUVs

W. Erick Rogers (6.2, 6.4) – Phase-averaged model development/validation; global, regional, sub-regional applications; remote sensing applications; forecasting systems

Jay Veeramony (6.1, 6.2) – Phase-resolved model development; turbulence and vorticity; nonlinear interactions; surf zone processes; nearshore wave breaking

David Wang (6.1) – Physical Oceanography; ship-borne experiments; data processing; basic processes research; sea-swell separation; extreme waves; wavelet and HHT

Page 14: Navy Modeling Activities

NRL Oceanography Division, Waves Group: Model Suite

Global, regional wave applications WAVEWATCH-III WAM (phasing out)

Subregional, coastal wave applications SWAN STWAVE (phasing out)

Wave-induced circulation Delft3D 1D Surf Model (phasing out)

Research codes REF/DIF1, REF/DIF-S, REF/DIF-SNL Boussinesq models (time-domain and frequency

domain)

Page 15: Navy Modeling Activities

Coastal Storms Program (CSP) (Sponsor: NOAA)

NRL Washington/Oregon Wave Forecasting System

Example forecast: 1200 UTC June 17 2005

http://www7320.nrlssc.navy.mil/CNW/

Page 16: Navy Modeling Activities

CSP Wave forecasting system

2D Graphics: Wave height, mean direction, wind speed, direction

Forcing from NCEP regional model

WA/OR system is one of three systems created by NRL for NOAA. (Support to NRL ~30k/yr)

Page 17: Navy Modeling Activities

CSP Wave forecasting system

6 Computational Grids for the WA/OR System:• 1 outer grid• 1 shelf grid• 3 3rd level nest• 1 4th level nest

Page 18: Navy Modeling Activities

CSP Wave forecasting system

Mouseover to view• prior analyses• present analysis• forecasts

Example 2D Graphic

Page 19: Navy Modeling Activities

CSP Wave forecasting system

Page 20: Navy Modeling Activities

CSP Wave forecasting system

Page 21: Navy Modeling Activities

CSP Wave forecasting system

Page 22: Navy Modeling Activities

CSP Wave forecasting system

Page 23: Navy Modeling Activities

CSP Wave forecasting system

Page 24: Navy Modeling Activities

CSP Wave forecasting system

Page 25: Navy Modeling Activities

CSP Wave forecasting system

Page 26: Navy Modeling Activities

CSP Wave forecasting system

Page 27: Navy Modeling Activities

CSP Wave forecasting system

Page 28: Navy Modeling Activities

CSP Wave forecasting system

Page 29: Navy Modeling Activities

CSP Wave forecasting system

Page 30: Navy Modeling Activities

Wave forecasts for the Columbia River nest include water level and current forcing provided by the Oregon Graduate Institute (available as experimental product on ftp site)

CSP Wave forecasting system

Page 31: Navy Modeling Activities

CSP Wave forecasting system

Example current forcing for experimental Col. R. nest

Page 32: Navy Modeling Activities

Wave Climatologies

Page 33: Navy Modeling Activities

Climatologies (Jim Dykes)

Page 34: Navy Modeling Activities

Climatologies (Jim Dykes)

From global climatology database

Page 35: Navy Modeling Activities

Model Development, Validation, and Related Research

Page 36: Navy Modeling Activities

Example of research and model development: Wave Propagation Over Viscous Muds

Collaborators: Alexandru Sheremet, Louisiana State University

Jim Kaihatu, Erick Rogers, NRL-Stennis

Cassino Beach, Brazil

Less mud, more breaking

More mud, less breaking

Formula describing wave attenuation by viscous mud layer has been implemented and tested in SWAN wave model. (Validation forthcoming)

Page 37: Navy Modeling Activities

Spectrum from WW3(NW location)

Spectrum from WW3(SW location, used to force SWAN)

CDIP buoy(NW location)

This component not measured by nearby CDIP buoyshown here

Spurious swell component exists here also

Spurious swell from southwest exists in the boundary forcing from WW3 ENP model

Oct 22 – Nov 8: study of swell forcing

Investigations of Wave Model Error, first example

Page 38: Navy Modeling Activities

Model uses DIA, but spreading is not overpredicted in the mean

Advanced validation of wave models: validation of directional spreading

Page 39: Navy Modeling Activities

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

longitude (deg)

latit

ud

e (

de

g)

WSPD (m/s) ; YY2003 MM01 DD21 HH15

150 200 250 300-40

-20

0

20

40

60

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

longitude (deg)

latit

ud

e (

de

g)

WSPD (m/s) ; ./../UVSPD.W6.MO01.DD21.HH15

150 200 250 300-40

-20

0

20

40

60

QuikSCAT data within ±6 hours of analysis time

Gaps filled in by blending with operational NOGAPS analyses

Wind analysis for Jan. 21. 1500Z, 2003

Utilizing remote sensing to determine source of model error

Page 40: Navy Modeling Activities

0

50

100

latit

ud

e (

de

g)

NOGAPS forcing

150 200 250 300-40

-20

0

20

40

60

0

50

100

Variance Density (m2/Hz) at 0.056 Hz ; DD11 ; HH12

longitude (deg)

latit

ud

e (

de

g)

QSCAT/NOGAPS forcing

150 200 250 300-40

-20

0

20

40

60

; Jan. 11, 2003, 1200 UTCW

ave

Ana

lyse

s fo

r Ja

n. 1

1, 2

003,

120

0 U

TC

Utilizing remote sensing to determine source of model error

Page 41: Navy Modeling Activities

Winter 2001/2002

Utilizing remote sensing to determine source of model error

Page 42: Navy Modeling Activities

SWAN error comparison at gage 10 (= normalized rms error)

baseline: REF/DIF model (no diffusion) =0.17

Equal resolution (xy=200m) BSBT

=0.74 SORDUP

=0.31 SL1

=0.25

Equivalent computation time BSBT (xy = 100 m)

=0.55 SORDUP (xy =

100m ) =0.26

SL1 (xy = 400 m ) =0.42

is a measure of relative erroris a measure of relative error

Investigations of Wave Model Error, second example

Page 43: Navy Modeling Activities

Evaluation of SWAN and WAVEWATCH3 for Hurricane Ivan (this is WW3)

Hm

0 (

m)

Page 44: Navy Modeling Activities

Wave measurements in the eye of Hurricane Ivan

Page 45: Navy Modeling Activities

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

-10

0

10

(

m)

2004-09-15 15:59:58

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

-10

0

10

(

m)

2004-09-15 23:59:55

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

-10

0

10

Time (sec)

(

m)

2004-09-16 07:59:53

SEED3

readWTfiles J:\SEEDDATA\WaveTide\SEED1\11127testingxxx.w t

Wave measurements in the eye of Hurricane Ivan

Page 46: Navy Modeling Activities

The End

Page 47: Navy Modeling Activities

6.2 ONR / 6.4 SPAWAR

Objective: Develop a nowcasting system for nearshore waves and circulation which combines bathymetry melded from various sources (including on-scene UUVs) with a nearshore modeling system forced by an integrated ocean predictionsystem

Approach:

• Evaluate Delft3D nearshore modeling system and integrate it with forcing fromDIOPS regional modeling system• Develop standalone implementation of modeling system which allows localobservations to be input as forcing for real time nowcast• Develop methodologies to meld UUV bathymetry with historical data and provideestimate of error

Project Title: Development of an AUV-Fed NearshoreNowcasting System

Co-investigators:

• Jim Kaihatu, Richard Allard, Todd Holland (7440), Brian Bourgeois (7440)

Page 48: Navy Modeling Activities

Application to CJTFEX 2004

• DIOPS SWAN forcing Delft3D

• Delft3D set up in UUV operating areas

Delft3D forecast waves and currents every 6 hours Sig. Wave

Ht.

0.7m

1ktU,V

Bathymetry updated with UUV measurements

htt

p:/

/ww

w7

32

0.n

rlss

c.navy.m

il/C

JTFEX

/CJT

FEX

_20

04

.htm

l

6.2 ONR / 6.4 SPAWAR Project Title: Development of an AUV-Fed Nearshore Nowcasting System

Page 49: Navy Modeling Activities

Generational Improvement in Operational Forecasting Capability

Previous nearshore operational capability: Navy Standard Surf Model One-dimensional Overly constrained: breaking waves

longshore currents Delft3D system now embedded at

Mission Support Center Communicates with DIOPS MSC scientists trained on DIOPS and Delft3D

Page 50: Navy Modeling Activities

Example Development/Validation Project: Random Wave Forcing of Nearshore Circulation

Validation of the REFDIFS-SHORECIRC combination atDuck94.

Top panel is the model-predicted magnitude of the cross-shore velocity.[red is shoreward (to the left), blueis seaward (to the right)]

Bottom panel is the velocity profile of the current (solid lines) comparedto measurements (+).

Page 51: Navy Modeling Activities

6.2 ONR / 6.4 SPAWAR Project Title: Development of an AUV-Fed Nearshore Nowcasting System

Bathymetric Update

Delft3D

DIOPS

Matlab Graphics Output

Automatically run for forecast cycle

Bathymetric Interpolator by Holland, et al.

Delft3D

Bathymetric Update

Delft3D

Transport to scene

Matlab Graphics Output

Wave input based on local observations

DIOPS for Tides

Bathymetric Interpolator by Holland, et al.

Coupled DIOPS/Delft3D System Standalone Delft3D

Page 52: Navy Modeling Activities

WW3 Significant Wave Height SE Asia, SeptemberResolution: 1 deg spatial, 3 hr temp

James Dykes, NRL-SSC, provided original plots . NRL-SSC will build 10 yr WW3 data sets for selected enclosed basins, such as Persian Gulf, at .2 deg.

Still need longer time period and higher resolution in space and time.

Long Term Mean (1993-2002)

Anomaly 1999 (La Nina)Anomaly 1997 (El Nino)

Climatologies

Page 53: Navy Modeling Activities

Climatologies (Jim Dykes)Domain for Med Sea10-year runs 1992 – 2002 pending


Recommended