Date post: | 30-Oct-2014 |
Category: |
Education |
Upload: | national-consumer-agency |
View: | 549 times |
Download: | 2 times |
National Consumer Agency
Market Research Findings:Consumer Switching Behaviour
September 2010Research Conducted by
2
Making Complaints
Consumer Switching Behaviour
Research Background & Methodology
Profile of Sample
Contents
3
Making Complaints
Key Findings
• To get a better deal continues to be the most influential driver of consumer switching behaviour.
• Across 17 key categories, consumers were most likely to have switched mobile telephone provider and car insurance provider. The biggest increase since the last wave is the number of consumers who have switched electricity supply service provider.
• Overall, across all categories, (excluding main and top up grocery shop which are examined in more detail in a separate report on grocery shopping) 83% of consumers, who had switched service providers in the last twelve months, said they had saved money as a result.
• Circa 4 in 5 (79%) consumers who had switched providers considered it to be an easy process relatively consistent with previous wave.
• Just over 3 in 5 (61%) consumers who have switched service provider feel that they are receiving a better service. A further 26% of consumers who have switched reported that they are receiving the same level of service.
4
Making Complaints
Extent of Switching Providers – Primary(Base: All aged 15-74 – 1,000)
Mobile telephone provider
Car Insurance provider
Fixed/landline telephone provider
Main grocery shop
Electricity supply service
Broadband/internet access provider
Yes
Wave 5 2010Wave 4 2009Wave 3 2009
( ) = Wave 4 2009
Switched in last 12 months
49%(62%)
57%(64%)
45%(47%)
47%(40%)
80%(78%)
58%(55%)
27
26
17
16
15
15
21
21
11
15
8
9
28
26
16
22
4
14
Switching Providers
(+6%)
(+5%)
(+6%)
(+7%)
(+6%)
5
Making Complaints
Extent of Switching Providers – Secondary(Base: All aged 15-74 – 1,000)
Bank/financial institution who offers Current A/C service
Top-up Grocery Shop
Home Insurance Provider
TV Service Provider e.g. Sky, NTL
Health Insurance Provider
Credit Card Provider
Yes
Wave 5 2010Wave 4 2009Wave 3 2009
( ) = Wave 4 2009
Switched in last 12 months
38%(34%)
44%(38%)
57%(54%)
50%(49%)
53%(61%)
38%(38%)
13
12
11
9
5
5
11
13
11
6
5
2
12
19
14
9
5
6
Switching Providers
6
Making Complaints
Extent of Switching Providers – Tertiary
(Base: All aged 15-74 – 1,000)
Gym membership
Savings/investment provider
Gas supply service
Provider of credit (more than 1 year but excluding mortgage)
Mortgage Credit provider
Yes Wave 5 2010Wave 4 2009Wave 3 2009
( ) = Wave 4 2009
Switched in last 12 months
37%(52%)
29%(34%)
61%(57%)
8%(37%)
14%(50%)
5
4
2
2
1
3
4
1
2
1
6
7
1
3
3
Switching Providers
7
Making Complaints
Whether or Not Saved Money Due to Switching Provider
(Base: All who have switched providers in the past 12 months)
Electricity supply service 92%
Home Insurance Provider 88%
Mobile Telephone
Provider 76%
Car Insurance Provider 84%
Broadband/Internet Access Provider 76%
TV Service Provider 74%
Fixed/Landline Telephone Provider
63%
Bank/Financial Institution 66%
Across all categories, (excluding main and top up grocery shop which are examined in more detail in a separate report on grocery shopping) 83% of consumers, who had switched service providers in the last twelve months, said they had
saved money as a result.
8
Making Complaints
Reasons for Switching
(Base: All aged 15-74 who switched providers – 562)
78
13
8
11
5
5
2
2
75
11
11
10
7
5
2
1
82
14
15
14
10
8
6
2
I switched to get a better deal because my other provider was too expensive
I switched due to poor customer service
I switched due to recommendations from friends/family members
I switched due to poor coverage/poor reception
I switched for convenience
I switched due to problems I was having with my provider
Other
Don't know/no particular reason
%Switching Providers
Wave 5 2010Wave 4 2009Wave 3 2009
9
Making Complaints
1 1 15 3 6 5
15 16 11 19
29 3230
50 52 50 45
29
Experience of the Switching Process(Base: All who have switched providers - 562)
%Very Difficult (5)
Somewhat Difficult (4)
Neither/Nor /don’t know(3)
Somewhat Easy (2)
Very Easy (1)
75%82%
%
Wave 3 2009 Wave 2 2008
81%
%
Wave 4 2009
–%
Wave 5 2010
79%
10
Making Complaints
30 25 30
3131
39
2623
254
11
1017
5
2
Service Receiving with New Provider
(Base: All who have switched service provider – 562)
Much better service (5)
–
Better service (4)
The same/no difference (3)
Worse service (2)Much worse service (1)
Don’t know
69%
Mean 4.0
%
Wave 3 2009
%
Wave 4 2009
3.9
56%
–
%
Wave 5 2010
61%
4.0
11
Making Complaints
Future Likelihood of Switching Providers – Primary
(Base: All aged 15-74 – 1,000)
Switching Providers YesWave 5 2010Wave 4 2009Wave 3 2009Car insurance provider
Home insurance provider
Mobile telephone provider
Main grocery shop
Top-up grocery shop
Electricity supply service
14
9
7
7
7
6
16
9
10
9
9
10
16
10
12
13
13
12
76% of those who are likely to switch provider within the
next 12 months are likely to do so in order to get a better deal as they feel their current
provider is too expensive.
12
Making Complaints
Future Likelihood of Switching Providers – Secondary
(Base: All aged 15-74 – 1,000)
Switching Providers YesWave 5 2010Wave 4 2009Wave 3 2009
Bank/financial institution who offers current a/c service
Broadband internet access provider
Fixed/landline telephone provider
Health insurance
TV service provider e.g. Sky, NTL
Credit Card provider
6
5
4
4
3
3
3
6
5
5
3
2
7
7
8
6
5
5
13
Making Complaints
Future Likelihood of Switching Providers – Tertiary
(Base: All aged 15-74 – 1,000)
Switching Providers Yes
Wave 5 2010Wave 4 2009Wave 3 2009
Savings/investments provider
Gym membership
Gas supply service
Provider of credit (more than 1 year but exc. Mortgage)
Mortgage credit provider
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
6
3
2
3
3
14
Making Complaints
• Amárach Research conducted the research by means of face-to-face interviewing with 1,000 people between the ages of 15-74.
• In all, 6 comparable “Waves” of Market Research have been completed since November / December 2007.
• To ensure that the data is nationally representative, quotas were applied on the basis of age, gender and social class.
• Interviewing was conducted over a four week period in June 2010.
Research Background and Methodology
Nov/Dec 2007 Aug 2008 Nov/Dec 2008
May/June 2009 Nov/Dec 2009 June 2010
Benchmark
Wave 3 Wave 4
Wave 1 Wave 2
Wave 5
Current Wave
15
Making Complaints
20
41 41
25
47
19
37
9
16
83
204
46
10
54
SEX AGEMARITALSTATUS
SOCIALCLASS
Profile of Sample – I(Base: All aged 15-74 – 1,000)
Male
Female
% % % %15-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55+
Married
Living as Married
Single
Wid/Div/Sep
ABC1
C2DE
F50+/F50-
MAIN GROCERY SHOPPER
Yes No46%54%
Not statedNot stated