+ All Categories
Home > Documents > NCHELP Spring Conference

NCHELP Spring Conference

Date post: 02-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: shay-farmer
View: 37 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
NCHELP Spring Conference. June 8, 2010 Is There Life After FFELP? Mark Weadick Managing Director Student Loan Capital Strategies LLC. Student Loan Sector: Significant Dislocation. Both Legislation and Credit Crisis have had major impact - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
18
NCHELP Spring Conference June 8, 2010 Is There Life After FFELP? Mark Weadick Managing Director Student Loan Capital Strategies LLC
Transcript
Page 1: NCHELP Spring Conference

NCHELP Spring ConferenceJune 8, 2010

Is There Life After FFELP?

Mark Weadick

Managing Director

Student Loan Capital Strategies LLC

Page 2: NCHELP Spring Conference

Student Loan Sector: Significant Dislocation

2

• Both Legislation and Credit Crisis have had major impact

• College Opportunity & Affordability Act passed in 2007– Significantly reduced economics of all FFELP originations– Consolidation loans became uneconomic

• ABS market access and economics impacted since August 2007

• Health Care Bill eliminates FFELP lending July 1, 2010

• Industry concentration has increased due to exit of many players

• Private loan originations have fallen by approximately 50%

Page 3: NCHELP Spring Conference

Student Loans are Major Component of Student Aid

________________________________________________Source: CollegeBoard. Figures include both undergraduate and graduate student aid.

$47.4 $49.5 $51.6 $57.5 $61.8

$14.2 $13.8 $12.9$13.8

$20.7$18.1 $21.2 $24.0$25.4

$13.3$21.4$20.5 $20.6

$22.3 $24.8$7.7 $7.7$8.2

$8.4 $8.5$35.0$37.5

$39.6

$42.2 $43.1$8.3$8.2

$8.1

$8.1 $8.0

$0

$40

$80

$120

$160

$200

2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009

FFELP Loans Direct Loans Other Loans Federal GrantsState Grants Other Grants Work-Study & Tax Benefits

$152.1$158.4

$164.9$177.8 $180.3

+7%

4-YearCAGR

+10%

(7%)

+4%

+3%

+5%

(1%)

Sources of Student Aid

($ in billions)

3

Page 4: NCHELP Spring Conference

Federal Government will Lend $90B Annually

________________________________________________Source: CollegeBoard. Figures include both undergraduate and graduate student aid.

$61.4$54.8 $58.0

$69.1

$84.0$0.8

$1.1$1.4

$1.4

$0.9

$16.0$13.0

$19.0

$21.1

$11.0

0

25

50

75

$100

04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09

Total Federal Loans State Sponsored Non-Federal Loans P rivate Sector Non-Federal Loans

$68.6 $75.1

$81.8

$91.6 $95.9

($ in billions)

Sources of Student Loans

CAGRPrivate Loans (4.1%)Government Loans 11.2Total 8.7%

4

Page 5: NCHELP Spring Conference

Jan 06 Sep 06 Jun 07 Feb 08 Nov 08 Jul 09 Apr 100

25

50

75

100

125

150

175

200

225

250

275

SLM Corp. Student Loan Corp. Nelnet Inc. First Marblehead Corp.

Relative Stock Price PerformancePrice Performance of Student Lenders

(52.8%)

(82.8%)(76.3%)

(87.7%)

11/7/06:Congressional

elections

4/15/07:Flowers / SLMannouncement

11/15/07:College Opportunity & Affordability Act

passed

1/25/08:Formal termination of JC Flowers / SLM

8/6/09:$1.4bn STU

TALF securitization

________________________________________________Source: FactSet, Capital IQ and press releases. Market data as of April 12, 2010.

4/7/08:The Education Resources Institute (TERI) bankruptcy filing

5/7/09:$2.6bn SLM

TALF securitization

1/29/10:STU announces restructuring of

Citi Omnibus Credit Facility

3/22/10:Reconciliation passes which

eliminates FFELP

Stock Price PerformanceYTD 1 Year 2 Year

SLM 15.7% 106.3% (26.9%)STU (22.9) (34.5) (62.3)NNI 11.4 92.6 56.5FMD 26.8 5.1 (30.8)

5

Page 6: NCHELP Spring Conference

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0x

J an 06 Sep 06 J un 07 Feb 08 Nov 08 J ul 09 Apr 10

SLM NNI FMD

0.00

3.00

6.00

9.00

12.00x

J an 06 Sep 06 J un 07 Feb 08 Nov 08 J ul 09 Apr 10SLM STU NNI FMD

Valuation Perspectives

Price / Tangible Book Value

Forward P/E (NTM) (1)

0.44x

1.63x

2.37x

0.91x

Averages6M 1YR 2YR 3YR

SLM 2.22x 1.93x 2.55x 4.00xSTU 0.57x 0.56x 0.86x 1.33xNNI 1.65x 1.51x 1.71x 2.39xFMD 0.63x 0.46x 0.60x 1.90x

________________________________________________Source: Capital IQ. Consensus estimates per Reuters. Market data as of April 12, 2010.(1) FMD earnings estimates no longer tracked by research analysts after August 2008. No research analyst coverage or earnings estimates available for STU.

Averages6M 1YR 2YR 3YR

SLM 8.20x 7.22x 8.34x 10.27xNNI 6.58x 6.75x 7.76x 8.67xFMD NA NA 6.61x 8.74x

7.9x8.4x

Valuations have fallen dramatically due to reduced government subsidies and concerns about funding access and cost

6

Page 7: NCHELP Spring Conference

$70 $67 $54 $68 $67$100

$59 $44

$89$76

$67$85 $82

$74

$36 $59

$151$229

$425

$460 $484

$217

$28

$43

$48

$63$67

$61$47

$58

$77$54

$58

$6$4$28 $21

$36

$12 $18

$374

$462

$652

$754 $754

$510

$139 $146

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Credit Cards Auto Home Equity Student Loans Other

ABS Markets Have Shrunk Dramatically

Source: Thomson Reuters Bloomberg, SIFMA.(1) Primarily includes commercial finance loans, CLOs, equipment leases, aircraft leases, manufactured housing, and timeshare loans.

($ in billions)

(1)

Student Loan ABS Total ABS Market (ex-TALF)

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Term Floating Auction Rate TALF

$38

$49

$60

$84

$79

$29 $28

$73

7

Page 8: NCHELP Spring Conference

FFELP ABS Spreads

Bond Average Life 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years 7 Years 10 Years

Pre Credit Crunch -3 -1 3 8 15

February 2009 150 195 225 240 NAApril 2009 125 160 190 215 NAJune 2009 80 115 135 155 NAMay 2010 40 65 80 95 NAJune 2010 45 70 85 100 NA

Tax-ExemptJune 2010 40 65 75 95

Student Loan ABS SpreadsInterest Cost of Bonds Backed by Student Loans

Interest Cost Expressed as a Spread (bps) to 3-Month LIBOR

» FFELP ABS spreads have tightened dramatically since the credit crunch though still elevated

» Recent European turmoil has caused some widening of spreads

» A new tax-exempt LFRN market brings attractive financing costs and financing for long duration assets

8

Page 9: NCHELP Spring Conference

Federal Student Loan Market Size

Lender Name FY09 % TotalSLM Corporation $154,142 36.6%Citibank, Student Loan Corp. $32,474 7.7%Wells Fargo/Wachovia $27,810 6.6%Nelnet $25,256 6.0%Brazos Group $13,048 3.1%PA Higher Ed. Asst. Auth. (PHEAA) $11,126 2.6%JP Morgan Chase Bank $11,100 2.6%Bank of America $10,067 2.4%College Loan Corp. $9,659 2.3%CIT/Student Loan Xpress $9,629 2.3%

Top 10 Holders $304,311 72.2%

Remaining Holders $117,019 27.8%

Source: US Department of Education, Federal Budget Request 2011, as of 9/30/09

9

Outstanding Federal Student Loans: Total $653 B Top 10 Holders of FFELP Loans

Page 10: NCHELP Spring Conference

Who holds Student Loan Collateral?

Loan Programs: $750 B Funding Source: $750 B

Private, $100 B

Direct, $150 B

FFELP, $420 B

FFELP - DOE Owned, $80

B

Balance Sheet, $80 B

FRN, $275 B

Govt., $230 B

Warehouse Borrowing, $40 B

Munis, $30 B

Straight-A Funding CP, $25 B ARS, $70 B

Dollars in Billions, SLCS estimates as of September 30, 2009

10

Page 11: NCHELP Spring Conference

Federal Loan Market Takeaways?

• Pace of Industry consolidation will quicken– Several businesses and portfolios are for sale

– High levels of “stuck” collateral on BSs and in “busted” financings

– How many states/nonprofits will liquidate or wind down?

• Federal Loan servicing – 5 primary federal servicers; ACS, Great Lakes, Nelnet, PHEAA and SLM

– Reconciliation: nonprofit’s may service up to 100,000 DL accounts

– Overall service levels expected to decline

– While legacy FFELP systems be supported?

• Keys to future FFELP/DL success– Access to capital , e.g. deposit funding

– Scale & Integrated business model

11

Page 12: NCHELP Spring Conference

0

2

4

6

1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007

Not-for-profit For-profit

Student Enrollment Trends

Projected Total Enrollment

For-profit education has grown rapidly over the past 10 years and is expected to outpace traditional not-for profit growth – for-profit enrollment estimated to reach over 2 million by fall of 2013

Full-Time vs. Part-Time

Private: Not-For-Profit vs. For-Profit Over-25 vs. Under-25

20.620.4

20.320.119.9

19.719.519.319.1

18.217.5

17.8

18.7 19.0

14

16

18

20

22

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

(Students in millions) (Students in millions)

(Students in millions)(Students in millions)

Source: College Board, US Department of Education and Wall Street Research.

CAGR: 0.9%

0

5

10

15

20

1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007

Full-time Part-time

Part-TimeCAGR: 1.27%

Full-TimeCAGR: 1.74%

0

5

10

15

20

25

1980 1990 1995 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2008E 2012E 2017E

Under 25 Over 25

63%

59%

37%

41%

61%

39%

58% 57% 61% 62% 61% 63% 61% 61% 61% 61%

42% 43% 39% 38% 39% 37% 39% 39% 39%

39%

Under-25CAGR: 1.23%

Over-25CAGR: 1.61%

Not-For-ProfitCAGR: 1.29%

For-ProfitCAGR: 9.14%

CAGR: 2.3%

12

Page 13: NCHELP Spring Conference

$9,528

$4,470

NA

$19,047

$9,396$10,030

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

$20,000

> 2-year 2-year 4-year

1995-1996 2007-2008

$2,492

$1,525

$2,802

$5,328

$2,749

$5,730

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

$7,000

> 2-year 2-year 4-year

1995-1996 2007-2008

$7,185

$3,517$2,868

$13,595

$5,914$5,757

0

5,000

10,000

$15,000

> 2-year 2-year 4-year

1995-1996 2007-2008

Tuition Pricing TrendsFor-profit tuition increases have been significant and have tracked broader education trends

In-State Out-of-State

Private: Not-for-Profit Private: for-Profit

CAGR: 6.5%

CAGR: 5.0%

CAGR: 6.1%

CAGR: 6.0%

CAGR: 4.4%

CAGR: 5.5%

CAGR: 6.4%

CAGR: 5.9%

Source: US Department of Education and Wall Street Research.

$7,412$6,727

NA

$14,908

$12,357$12,305

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

$20,000

> 2-year 2-year 4-year

1995-1996 2007-2008

CAGR: 5.2%

CAGR: 6.0%

13

Page 14: NCHELP Spring Conference

The Need for Private Loans Remains High

$22,790

$26,273

$5,830$7,020

$14,174

$5,500$6,500

$7,500 $7,500

$5,350

Average Cost of Private Not-for-Profit

4-Year

Average Cost of Private

For-Profit 4-Year

Average Cost of Public 4-Year

Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior Annual Maximum

________________________________________________Source: CollegeBoard and Wall Street research.

Funding

Undergraduate Stafford Loan Limits Pell Grants

Tuition and Fees

2004-2005 school year

2009-2010 school yearGrowth: 15%

CAGR: 3%

Growth: 20%

CAGR: 4%

14

Page 15: NCHELP Spring Conference

Student Borrow ing

23%

Parent Borrow ing

16%

Post-secondary Education Funding SourcesOver 50% of post-secondary education is funded through grants and loans

Average American Family

Parent Contributions from Borrowed Sources (16%) Student Contributions from Borrowed Sources (23%)

Source: Sallie Mae and Gallup.

Parent Income / Savings

33%

Student Income / Savings

10%Grants /

Scholarships15%

Friends / Relatives

3%

Federal PLUS Loan33%

Other Loans26%

Retirement Account

3%

Home Equity Loan19%

Credit Card6%

Federal Student Loan

52%

Other Loans22%

Credit Card4%

Private Education

Loan13%

Private Education

Loan22%

15

Page 16: NCHELP Spring Conference

Private Loan Market Overview

Dynamics Size of Market (1)

Key Players Today

» Only a handful of institutions are originating loans » Non-TALF ABS market is very challenged:

• Long-tail nature of assets • Unsecured• Limited performance data• Poor performance history

» Lack of competition is facilitating lender friendly terms

• Higher FICO scores• Co-borrowers required• LIBOR+8 to10 pricing• More ABS friendly terms likely over time

» Loans are currently non-dischargeable in bankruptcy, there is an active political debate on this topic

» Schools will remain the primary distribution channel due to certification issues and asset quality concerns

$0.0

$5.0

$10.0

$15.0

$20.0

$25.0

'95-'96 '96-'97 '97-'98 '98-'99 '99-'00 '00-'01 '01-'02 '02-'03 '03-'04 '04-'05 '05-'06 '06-'07 '07-'08 '08-'09

Loan Originations ($ in billions)

________________________________________________(1) Source: CollegeBoard.

CAGR (through ’07-’08): 2

4.5%

Credit Unions

16

Page 17: NCHELP Spring Conference

Recent Private Loan SecuritizationsPrivate Loans

Municipal Private Loans

17

Issue Date Issue Size Structure Pool WAM AAA Bond WAL Weighted FRN Cost AAA Advance Rate TALFNCSLT 2007-1 3/8/2007 1,125,300,000 FRN 266 8.85 LIBOR+17 88.70% NoSLM PCSLT 2007-A 3/29/2007 2,239,306,000 FRN/ARS 213 8.25 LIBOR+14 95.20% NoNCSLT 2007-2 6/14/2007 1,041,000,000 FRN 263 8.74 LIBOR+26 89.90% NoNCSLT 2007-4 9/20/2007 1,464,000,000 FRN/ARS 269 10.26 LIBOR+78 91.60% No

SLM PELT 2009-A 3/12/2009 1,497,815,000 FRN 202 NA LIBOR+601 47.00% NoSLM PELT 2009-B 5/12/2009 2,592,594,000 FRN 208 4.38 LIBOR+600 58.70% YesSLM PELT 2009-C 7/14/2009 1,108,728,000 FRN 207 3.92 Prime+125 60.10% YesSLC TRUST 2009-A 8/13/2009 1,396,000,000 FRN 250 7.49 Prime+150 55.70% YesSLM PELT 2009-D 8/13/2009 1,680,000,000 FRN 210 NA Prime+25 63.40% YesSLM PELT 2009-CT 12/10/2009 392,243,000 FRN 138 NA Prime-90 60.10% YesSLC TRUST 2010-A 2/12/2010 781,000,000 FRN 244 NA Prime+100 55.68% NoSLC TRUST 2010-BA1 3/11/2010 207,700,000 FRN 262 NA Prime+75 76.53% NoSLC TRUST 2010-BA2 3/11/2010 475,500,000 FRN 268 NA LIBOR+350 75.01% No

Issue Date Issue Size Structure Ratings (M/S/F) Starting Parity Credit EnhancementMELA 5/27/2009 210,000,000 Fixed Aa2/AAA/NR 101.66% Assured Gty, Moral Ob., OCHESAA 6/23/2009 450,000,000 Fixed NR/AA/A+ 103.85% Moral Ob., OCMEFA 6/30/2009 289,005,000 Fixed NR/AA/A 112.32% OCRISLA 7/7/2009 25,570,000 Fixed NR/A+/A 115.89% OCISLLC 11/24/2009 230,170,000 Fixed A1/A/NR 112.82% OCHESAA 1/26/2010 713,000,000 Fixed Aa2/AA/NR 109.73% Moral Ob., OCRISLA 3/31/2010 16,970,000 Fixed NR/A+/A 109.16% OC

Page 18: NCHELP Spring Conference

Private Student Loan Market Takeaways

• $10B+ demand for private loans, with good growth potential

• Primary distribution channel will be school “certified”

• Lender “brand” will be increasingly important to borrowers

• Securitization markets for private loans will remain challenged– Long loan terms very difficult to finance

– Subordinate tranches very challenged

– Small market size and uneven performance data

– Paradoxically, municipal markets are open for state/nonprofit issuers

• As such, private market likely to become more concentrated– Market size will not support multiple players

– Lender “brand” and deposit funding are key attributes

18


Recommended