+ All Categories
Home > Documents > NCHRP PROJECT 20-83 (05) AN ENGINEERING PERSPECTIVE...

NCHRP PROJECT 20-83 (05) AN ENGINEERING PERSPECTIVE...

Date post: 13-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: vuongnga
View: 216 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
21
CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE HIGHWAY SYSTEM: IMPACTS AND ADAPTATION APPROACHES NCHRP PROJECT 20-83 (05) AN ENGINEERING PERSPECTIVE Mr. Michael Flood, AICP, Senior Planner, Parsons Brinckerhoff Dr. Michael D. Meyer, PE, Frederick R. Dickerson Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology Mr. Jake Keller, M.ASCE, National Technical Director of Civil Engineering, Parsons Brinckerhoff 1
Transcript

CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE HIGHWAY SYSTEM: IMPACTS AND ADAPTATION APPROACHESNCHRP PROJECT 20-83 (05)

AN ENGINEERING PERSPECTIVE

Mr. Michael Flood, AICP, Senior Planner, Parsons BrinckerhoffDr. Michael D. Meyer, PE, Frederick R. Dickerson Professor, School of Civil and

Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of TechnologyMr. Jake Keller, M.ASCE, National Technical Director of Civil Engineering,

Parsons Brinckerhoff

1

TOPICS

2

TOPICS

What about climate change to engineers need to be concerned about?

NCHRP project summary Research findings Expected climate change Recommended approach Benefit/Costs and risk Implementation challenges The engineering challenge

3

CONCERNS

4

WHAT DO WE NEED TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT?

Generally, a warming planet and changing precipitation patterns

An increase in frequency and intensity of storms

An increase in atmospheric temperature• Sea level rise and storm surge

• Flooding, drainage

• Structural integrity

WHAT DO WE NEED TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT?

Climate Change will always be a future undefined risk, but traditional approaches are often based on past events. This contrast is the crux of the issue facing the engineering community.

NCHRP PROJECT SUMMARY

7

NCHRP PROJECT SUMMARY

NAS project considering climate adaptation needs and solutions for the U.S. highway system

Project objectives…• Synthesize likely climate change impacts to the U.S.

highway system through 2050• Recommend approaches, strategies, and tools DOTs can

use to avoid these impacts• Prepare guidance documents outlining how to adapt U.S.

highways to climate change• Identify future research needs and activities

2.5 year project (2010-2012)

RESEARCH FINDINGS

9

SOME OF THE RESEARCH FINDINGS

Majority of U.S. highway agencies are not focused on threats of climate change

Lack of detailed relevant climate data is an impediment to action

National leadership will be critical to consistent actions across DOTs

Most agencies begin their adaptation work with qualitative risk analyses of existing assets

Few examples yet of adaptation deliberately being included in project design or planning

Selective adaptation seems more common

Sea level rise, storm surge, and increased intense precipitation events could be the biggest climate threats to the highway system

EXPECTED CLIMATE CHANGES 2010-2050 (IMAGES FROM REPORT) Country divided into regions

Expectations for annual increases in temperature across the country, with more pronounced changes in Alaska and the upper mid-west

Expectations for changing summer precipitation patterns with a wetter Alaska and northeast and drier conditions elsewhere in the county

12

13

AN APPROACH

14

A RECOMMENDED APPROACH – DIAGNOSTIC FRAMEWORK)

BENEFIT/COST ASSESSMENT METHODS

Includes probability methodology• Statistics and subjective probability

Completed in draft, will require review by panel prior to issuance

CHALLENGES

17

CHALLENGES TO IMPLEMENTATION – POLITICAL AND SCIENTIFIC

“I think we're seeing almost weekly, or even daily, scientists that are coming forward and questioning the original idea that man-made global warming is what is causing the climate to change” Texas Governor Rick Perry

“Adaptation requires best available actionable science, not simply best available science. There is a huge body of scientific literature about climate science. However, users require some translation and a reasonable process to move from science outputs to adaptation planning and implementation” USACEClimate Change Adaptation Plan and Report 2011

THE CHALLENGE FOR THE ENGINEERING COMMUNITY Determine reasonable methods to address risks

in lieu of actionable science

Incorporate climate risk at the project level and share/debate approaches and outcomes

Develop flexible design options on projects with a range of unknowns

Design without precluding future risk mitigation measures: Adaptive Design

THE RESEARCH TEAM

Parsons Brinckerhoff Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Stratus, Inc. Resource Systems Group, Inc. Applied Research Associates, Inc. M2 Resource Consulting, Inc.

Jake KellerNational Technical Director of Civil Engineering

Norfolk, [email protected]

QUESTIONS & COMMENTS

PARSONSBRINCKERHOFF


Recommended