+ All Categories
Home > Documents > NDVIPRESENT2

NDVIPRESENT2

Date post: 10-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: subir-mitra
View: 212 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 8

Transcript
  • 8/8/2019 NDVIPRESENT2

    1/8

    Examining relationship between

    NDVI (Normally Differentiated Vegetation Index)

    and

    production/procurementusing freely available Remote Sensing Data

  • 8/8/2019 NDVIPRESENT2

    2/8

    Motivation I

    NDVI (Normally Differentiated Vegetation Index) has been used

    extensively to measure vegetation cover characteristics, cropassessment studies, monitor health of crops over large regions,monitor vegetation change and estimate biomass. Time seriesanalysis of NDVI allows establishment of a baseline for normalvegetation productivity for a region.

    Moreover, it has been used in regression models to predict crop

    harvests with high degree of accuracy. Crop residues/green fodder is universally used as the primary bulk

    feed either in-situ or ex-situ. Crop residues are stored typically for 6months to one year, after the harvests.

    production is dependant upon the availability of feed.

    procurement trend would follow that of production if all external

    conditions remain same including competition and payment tofarmers.

    Thus, procurement or production may be linked or correlated withNDVI with a lag of 6 months

  • 8/8/2019 NDVIPRESENT2

    3/8

    Motivation II

    Normally remote sensing data is expensive and its analysis requires

    expert manpower and costly software. However, GLAM (Global Agricultural Monitoring project) of USDA

    has been providing processed NDVI data for all parts of India at a

    comparatively high level resolution of 250 sq.meters. This is

    provided through internet free of cost and updated every fortnight.

    Village boundary information can be now overlaid with NDVI data(downloaded from USDA) to arrive at the composite NDVI for any

    specific village for every fortnight.

    Thus, it is possible to correlate this data with monthly time series

    milk procurement data for the villages. Thereafter, suitable models

    can be developed for predicting short term changes in

    production/procurement.

  • 8/8/2019 NDVIPRESENT2

    4/8

    Experimental work with 2 villages (Waghod &Morgaon ) in Jalgaon

    based upon procurement data between Apr-Nov05 & Apr-Nov06

    Downloaded NDVI data for India

    and specific area in Jalgaon district

    Source: Global Agricultural Monitoring Project, USDA

  • 8/8/2019 NDVIPRESENT2

    5/8

    Example: NDVI information during the fortnight Sep 13 Sep28, 2004 downloaded from

    USDA website and overlaid on village boundary information of Jalgaon District. The areaunder study highlighted in box showing the 2 villages.

  • 8/8/2019 NDVIPRESENT2

    6/8

    Combined monthwise procurement in 2005-06 and 2006-07in the 2 villages (In Kgpd)

    0

    100

    200300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    900

    1000

    APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV

    PROC0506

    PROC0607

    PROC0506 PROC0607

    APR 680 617

    MAY 501 456

    JUN 446 318

    JUL 485 295

    AUG 483 250

    SEP 575 329

    OCT 774 394

    NOV 895 568

  • 8/8/2019 NDVIPRESENT2

    7/8

    NDVI between harvest to next harvest 2004-05, 2005-06 & 2006-07 in

    the specific area along with the short-term mean of 5 years

    NDVI is at its peak value just before harvesting. NDVI has been found to have very strong correlation

    with biomass availability (Kg/sq.m). We may see that 2004-05 had been a good crop year in comparison

    to 2005-06.

    70

    72

    74

    76

    78

    8082

    84

    86

    88

    90

    SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR

    NDVI0405

    NDVI0506

    NDVI0607

    NDVI0405 NDVI0506 NDVI0607

    SEP 88 87 82

    OCT 85 83 82

    NOV 84 80 81

    DEC 83 79 81

    JAN 83 78 80

    FEB 83 76 79

    MAR 75 75 72

  • 8/8/2019 NDVIPRESENT2

    8/8

    Correlating lean-flush monthly NDVI values with procurement with a

    lag of 6 months beginning with harvesting month i.e. NDVI values

    between Sep-Feb of the previous year vs. procurement in Apr-Sep in

    current year

    PROC0506 PROC0607

    PR 680 617

    MAY 501 456

    UN 446 318

    UL 485 295

    UG 483 250

    SEP 575 329

    OCT 774 394

    NOV 895 568

    NDVI0405 NDVI0506

    SEP 88 87

    OCT 85 83

    NOV 84 80

    DEC 83 79

    AN 83 78

    FEB 83 76

    MAR 75 75

    CORRELATION 0.71 0.90

    We observe a high degree of correlation in both

    the years.

    This may be explained by the fact that in 2004-05

    the general harvest in Sep04 was much betteras evidenced by high NDVI values, which

    reflected in higher production/procurement in the

    forthcoming lean in Apr05.

    In Sep05 the harvest seems to be poorer with

    lower NDVI values and corresponding drop in

    production/procurement in coming lean seasonbeginning Apr06 onwards.