phys. stat. sol. (b), 1–5 (2006) / DOI 10.1002/pssb.200669179
© 2006 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Early View publication on www.interscience.wiley.com (issue and page numbers not yet assigned; citable using Digital Object Identifier – DOI)
Original
Paper
Near-field imaging and spectroscopy of electronic states
in single-walled carbon nanotubes
Huihong Qian1, Tobias Gokus1, Neil Anderson2, Lukas Novotny2, Alfred J. Meixner1,
and Achim Hartschuh*, 1, 2
1 Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Tuebingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 8,
72076 Tuebingen, Germany 2 University of Rochester, The Institute of Optics, Rochester, New York 14627, USA
Received 21 April 2006, revised 30 May 2006, accepted 1 August 2006
Published online 19 September 2006
PACS 73.22.–f, 78.30.Na, 78.66.Tr
Near-field photoluminescence spectroscopy was used to study the electronic properties of semiconducting
Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes in different environments. A sharp laser-illuminated metal tip was raster
scanned over the sample and served as a strongly confined excitation source. We observed localization of
photoluminescence and variations of emission energies along nanotubes on a length scale of about 30 nm.
© 2006 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1 Introduction
Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes (SWNTs) are promising candidates for applications in photonics and
opto/nano-electronics because of their unique electronic properties [1]. For applications as 1D wires in
long range energy and charge transfer, possible variations of these properties along individual nanotubes
play an important role. The spatial resolution achieved in conventional confocal microscopy, on the other
hand, is limited by diffraction to about half the wavelength of the excitation light. The spectroscopic data
obtained thus only represents an average over a nanotube section of about 300 nm. In this work, we pre-
sent an investigation on both photoluminescence imaging and spectroscopy of SWNTs embedded in
different environments using near-field microscopy with a resolution below 15 nm. This technique al-
lows us to visualize the spatial extent of electronic states and to probe their emission energy.
2 Experimental
The experimental setup is based on the combination of an inverted confocal microscope shown sche-
matically in Fig. 1, with an x, y scan stage, and a tuning fork unit for shear force detection. A radially
polarized laser beam [2] serves as excitation source providing a strong longitudinal field component in
the focus that is required for field enhancement [3, 4]. Both, Raman scattered and photoluminescence
light are detected either by a charge coupled device, or by two single-photon counting avalanche photo-
diodes simultaneously in our setup. A more detailed description of the experimental setup can be found
in [5, 6]. Two different samples were studied: DNA-wrapped nanotubes were prepared according to [7]
and dropped on a glass cover slip from aqueous solution; SDS encapsulated nanotubes [8] were spin cast
on a thin layer of freshly cleaved MICA.
* Corresponding author: e-mail: [email protected], Phone: +49 7071 29 76171, Fax: +49 7071 29 5490
2 Huihong Qian et al.: Near-field imaging and spectroscopy of electronic states in SWNTs
© 2006 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.pss-b.com
Fig. 1 (online colour at: www.pss-b.com) Schematic of the experimental setup. A sharp metal tip is
scanned through a tightly focused laser beam. BS: Non-polarizing beam splitter. FM: Flip mirror. DBS:
Dichroic beam splitter.
3 High resolution imaging of SWNT: Localization of photoluminescence
Figure 2 shows simultaneously acquired near-field Raman (b) and photoluminescence (c) images of
DNA-wrapped nanotubes on glass. The Raman image was detected by integrating the Raman G-band
intensity around 700 nm after laser excitation at 632.8 nm. The photoluminescence (PL) signal repre-
sents the intensity around 950 nm. The topography (a) of the same sample area was detected simultane-
ously. Figure 2(d)–(f) show topographical and optical cross sections taken along the dashed lines in
(a)–(c) respectively. The high spatial resolution of about 14 nm as indicated in the PL image is far below
the diffraction limit. In general, the resolution in near-field optical microscopy is limited by the tip size.
Fig. 2 (online colour at: www.pss-b.com) Topography (a) for DNA-wrapped SWNTs on glass and si-
multaneously detected Near-field Raman (b) and PL image (c). (d)–(f) are topographic and optical cross
sections taken along the dashed lines in (a)–(c), respectively.
phys. stat. sol. (b) (2006) 3
www.pss-b.com © 2006 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Original
Paper
In the topographic image, a nanotube is seen to extend from the upper left to the lower right. The
measured height in the cross section along the dash line is about 2.5 nm. This is in agreement with the
expected height of a single DNA-wrapped nanotube [9]. The Raman signal occurs along the nanotube,
but disappears before the nanotube ends in the topography image. The PL signal, on the other hand, is
localized within about 90 nm and occurs just where the Raman signal ends. This observation can be
explained by a change in chirality (n, m) along the nanotube. In the upper section, the nanotube’s elec-
tronic states, given by (n, m), are in resonance with the laser energy leading to resonance Raman scatter-
ing. Here, the nanotube is either metallic, i.e. non-luminescent, or the emission energy is outside of the
detection window of 950 nm ± 20 nm. The nanotube chirality (n, m) in the lower section is associated
with weaker resonance Raman enhancement while non-resonant excitation leads to PL about 950 nm.
Structural transitions along individual nanotubes have been reported before based on Raman data [10,
11].
The dark spot in the lower part of the Raman image (b) is caused by a large particle that can be seen in
the topography image with a height of 14 nm. At this position, the particle prevents laser excitation of
the gold tip and therefore reduces the photoluminescence from gold which is detected as a background
signal [12]. This is a well-known effect in near-field optical microscopy. The reduced optical signal that
is observed on the tube in the upper left part is also a result of this effect. In addition, the signal en-
hancement at this position is effectively reduced because of an increased tip-nanotube distance [5].
4 Near-field spectroscopy of SWNT: Variation of emission
Figure 3 shows simultaneously acquired topography and near-field PL images of SWNTs in SDS on
MICA. In the present case, the PL is extended over about 400 nm. The flakes in the background of the
topography image with a height of about 1.4 nm are expected for a single layer of sodium dodecyl sulfate
(SDS) surfactant. The height of the nanotube measured at the dashed line in the topography image is
about 3.5 nm. Based on the topographic data, it is not possible to distinguish between a single SDS-
wrapped nanotube and a thin bundle.
Near-field photoluminescence spectra detected by probing at 6 different positions along the nanotube
separated by 30 nm are shown in Fig. 3(c). The spectra show a significant variation of the emission en-
ergy ranging from ~950 nm to ~975 nm. In standard confocal microscopy, only a spatial average could
be observed leading to a broadened emission band.
Most of the near-field images of SWNTs on substrates we recorded up to now exhibit a varying de-
gree of localization of the PL. In general, localization could result from chirality variations along the
nanotube leading to luminescent and non-luminescent sections as discussed in part 3 of this paper. Fur-
thermore, defect related non-luminescent trap states can quench the emissive state [13]. Spatial variations
Fig. 3 (online colour at: www.pss-b.com) Near-field PL spectra (c) taken along positions 1–6 indicated
in the near-field PL image of the SWNT in (b). The topography (a) of this tube was obtained simultane-
ously.
4 Huihong Qian et al.: Near-field imaging and spectroscopy of electronic states in SWNTs
© 2006 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.pss-b.com
Fig. 4 (online colour at: www.pss-b.com) Tip-enhanced Raman (a) and photoluminescence (b) spectra
of SWNTs detected with and without tip.
of the emission energy, on the other hand, could also result from inhomogeneous dielectric environ-
ments. Changes of the dielectric constant of the surrounding media have been reported to shift the emis-
sion energy by several tens of meV [14–16]. Transitions in DNA conformation, for example, lead to
shifts of up to 15 meV for DNA-wrapped nanotubes. From the topographic measurement, it is clear that
the wrapping by SDS and DNA is not uniform along the nanotubes for our samples and considerable
fluctuations of the dielectric constant can be expected.
Raman and PL spectra in the presence and the absence of the tip are taken to illustrate the signal en-
hancement achieved in our experiment (shown in Fig. 4). For Raman scattering, the signal is increased
by an enhancement of both the incident field and the scattered field. The PL intensity, on the other hand,
depends on the excitation rate and the radiative rate of SWNTs. Both rates can be increased by the metal
tip acting as an antenna for radiation. The total detected signal in tip-enhanced microscopy consists of
this tip-enhanced near-field and a confocal farfield contribution. For both Raman and PL, the near-field
contribution clearly dominates in Fig. 2(b) and (c). While in the Raman image a weak and broad farfield
signal can be seen following the nanotube, no farfield signal is observed in the PL image. From this it is
evident that the signal enhancement for PL must be stronger than that for Raman scattering. A quantita-
tive comparison of the signal enhancements achieved for Raman scattering and PL from the same nano-
tube indicated that the tip enhancement is in fact more efficient for PL [17].
5 Summary
In this contribution, we present a high-resolution near-field method for studying photoluminescence and
Raman scattering of SWNTs. Upon localized excitation, we observed strongly confined emission signals
and a variation of emission spectra along isolated nanotubes.
Acknowledgements The authors thank G. Schulte for valuable experimental support. This work was supported by
the DFG through Grant ME1600/5-1 and the U.S. Department of Energy through Grant DE-FG02-01ER15204.
References
[1] P. G. Collins and P. Avouris, Sci. Am. 283, 62 (2000).
[2] R. Dorn, S. Quabis, and G. Leuchs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 233901 (2003). [3] L. Novotny, E. J. Sánchez, and X. S. Xie, Ultramicroscopy 71, 21 (1998). [4] A. Bouhelier, M. R. Beversluis, A. Hartschuh, and L. Novotny, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 013903 (2003).
[5] A. Hartschuh, M. R. Beversluis, A. Bouhelier, L. Novotny, Philos. Trans., Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 807 (2004).
[6] A. Hartschuh, E. J. Sánchez, X. S. Xie, and L. Novotny, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 095503 (2003).
[7] M. Zheng et al., Nature 2, 338 (2003).
phys. stat. sol. (b) (2006) 5
www.pss-b.com © 2006 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Original
Paper
[8] M. J. O’Connell et al., Science 297, 593, (2002).
[9] R. L. P. Adams, J. T. Knowler, and D. P. Leader, The Biochemistry of the Nucleic Acids (Chapman & Hall,
London, 1992), chap. 2.
[10] N. Anderson, A. Hartschuh, S. Cronin, and L. Novotny, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 2533 (2005).
[11] S. K. Doorn, M. J. O’Connell, L. Zheng, Y. T. Zhu, S. Huang, and J. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 016802 (2005).
[12] M. R. Beversluis, A. Bouhelier, and L. Novotny, Phys. Rev. B 68, 115433 (2003).
[13] A. Hagen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 197401 (2005).
[14] E. S. Jeng, A. E. Moll, A. C. Roy, J. B. Gastala, and M. S. Strano, Nano Lett. 6, 371, (2006).
[15] D. A. Heller et al., Science 311, 508 (2006).
[16] T. Hertel et al., Nano Lett. 5, 511 (2005).
[17] A. Hartschuh, H. Qian, A. J. Meixner, N. Anderson, and L. Novotny, Nano Lett. 5, 2310 (2005).