+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN...

Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN...

Date post: 09-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 4 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
133
NEGATION IN KANNADA Raghavachari Amritavalli M.A., Bangalore University A THESIS SUB?!ITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF bIASTER OF ARTS in the Department ~f Modern Languages RAGHAVACHARI AMRI TAVAL LI 19 7 7 .- - SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY November 1977 All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author,
Transcript
Page 1: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

NEGATION IN KANNADA

Raghavacha r i A m r i t a v a l l i

M . A . , Banga lo re U n i v e r s i t y

A THESIS SUB?!ITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF

THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF

bIASTER OF ARTS

i n t h e Department

~f

Modern Languages

RAGHAVACHARI AMRI TAVAL LI 19 7 7 .- - SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY

November 1977

A l l r i g h t s r e s e r v e d . T h i s t h e s i s may n o t b e r e p r o d u c e d i n whole o r i n p a r t , by photocopy o r o t h e r means , w i t h o u t p e r m i s s i o n o f t h e a u t h o r ,

Page 2: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

APPROVAL

Name : Raghavacha r i A m r i t a v a l l i

Degree : M a s t e r o f A r t s

T i t l e o f T h e s i s : N e g a t i o n i n Kannada

Examining Commit tee:

Chairman : C h a r l e s P. Eouton

N e v i l l e J . L i n c o l n

-

R i c h a r d C . DeArmond

H . F . Sch i f fman 1 '

E x t e r n a l Examiner A s s o c i a t e P r o f e s s o r

U n i v e r s i t y o f Washington , S e a t t l e , Washington

Page 3: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE

I hereby g r a n t t o Simon F r a s e r U n i v e r s i t y t h e r i g h t t o lend

my t h e s i s o r d i s s e r t a t i o n ( t h e t i t l e of which i s shown below) t o u s e r s

of t h e Simon F r a s e r U n i v e r s i t y L i b r a r y , and t o make p a r t i a l o r s i n g l e

c o p i e s o n l y f o r s u c h u s e r s o r i n r e s p o n s e t o a r e q u e s t from t h e l i b r a r y

of any o t h e r u n i v e r s i t y , o r o t h e r e d u c a t i o n a l i n s t i t u t i o n , on i t s own

b e h a l f o r f o r one of i t s u s e r s . I f u r t h e r a g r e e t h a t pe rmiss ion f o r

m u l t i p l e copying of t h i s t h e s i s f o r s c h o l a r l y purposes may be g r a n t e d

b y me o r t h e Dean of Graduate S t u d i e s . It is unders tood t h a t copying

o r p u b l i c a t i o n of t h i s t h e s i s f o r f i n a n c i a l g a i n s h a l l n o t be a l lowed

w i t h o u t my w r i t t e n pe rmiss ion .

T i t l e of T h e s i s / ~ i s s e r t a t i o n :

( s i g n a t u r e )

(name )

( d a t e )

Page 4: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

ABSTRACT

NEGATION IN KANNADA

I n t h i s t h e s i s , an e x a m i n a t i o n of t h e s y n t a x and s e m a n t i c s

o f n e g a t i o n (and r e l a t e d a s p e c t s ) i n Kannada, a D r a v i d i a n

l anguage spoken ma in ly i n K a r n a t a k a , I n d i a , i s u n d e r t a k e n . The

t h e o r e t i c a l framework i s p r o v i d e d by t h e t h e o r y o f

T r a n s f o r m a t i o n a l - G e n e r a t i v e grammar a s expounded by Chomsky i n

S y n t a c t i c S t r u c t u r e s (1957) and Aspec t s o f t h e Theory of S y n t a x

( 1 9 6 5 ) , w i t h s u b s e q u e n t m o d i f i c a t i o n s and e l a b o r a t i o n s (Chomsky

1970 , 1 9 7 1 , 1975 ; Emonds 1976; J a c k e n d o f f 1 9 7 2 ) . The model ,

t h e r e f o r e , i n c o r p o r a t e s a g e n e r a t i v e s y n t a c t i c component and an

i n t e r p r e t i v e s e m a n t i c component .

C h a p t e r I i n t r o d u c e s t h e v a r i e t y o f forms which a r e f e l t

t o be ' i n t u i t i v e l y n e g a t i v e ' i n Kannada, and b r i e f l y r ev i ews

work on Kannada n e g a t i o n t o d a t e . I n C h a p t e r 1 1 , a t e s t f o r

neg i s p r o p o s e d , where neg i s d e f i n e d as a s e m a n t i c f e a t u r e

t o be r e c o g n i s e d by t h e s y n t a c t i c and s e m a n t i c consequences o f

i t s p r e s e n c e i n t h e s e n t e n c e . The ' i n t u i t i v e l y n e g a t i v e ' forms

a r e t h u s r e d e f i n e d i n te rms of w h e t h e r o r n o t t h e y c a r r y t h e

f e a t u r e neg, and t h e s cope of i n q u i r y i s c o n s e q u e n t l y d e l i m i t e d .

The p e c u l i a r i t i e s o f d i s t r i b u t i o n o f t he forms which have b e e n

d e f i n e d a s neg a r e n o t e d : Kannada i s shown t o have d i f f e r e n t

forms o f n e g a t i o n depend ing on w h e t h e r t h e n e g a t i o n o c c u r s i n

c o p u l a t i v e , v e r b l e s s s e n t e n c e s , t e n s e d s e n t e n c e s , non- t e n s e d

s e n t e n c e s , and s e n t e n c e s w i t h moda l s , i n c o n t r a s t t o n e g a t i o n

i n E n g l i s h , where - n o t a p p e a r s i n a l l t h e above t y p e s o f s e n t e n c e s .

Page 5: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

C h a p t e r s I 1 1 and I V examine t h e s y n t a x o f t h e v a r i o u s neg

f o r m s , and C h a p t e r V p r o p o s e s r u l e s o f s e m a n t i c i n t e r p r e t a t i o n

f o r t h e s e fo rms .

I t i s hoped t h a t t h i s t h e s i s w i l l s e r v e a s a s t i m u l u s

f o r r e s e a r c h i n t o t h e s y n t a x and s e m a n t i c s o f Kannada, s i n c e

v e r y few d e s c r i p t i o n s o f a s p e c t s o f Kannada w i t h i n t h e

t h e o r e t i c a l framework assumed h e r e a r e a v a i l a b l e . On a

d i f f e r e n t l e v e l , by a t t e m p t i n g t o d e s c r i b e a D r a v i d i a n l anguage

w i t h t h e t o o l s e v o l v e d ma in ly t h r o u g h a s y s t e m a t i c e x p l o r a t i o n

o f Indo-European l a n g u a g e s , i t i s hoped t o q u e s t i o n o r v a l i d a t e

t h e model i t s e l f . T h i s i s , t h e r e f o r e , an i n i t i a l c o n t r i b u t i o n

towards t h e s e a r c h f o r l i n g u i s t i c u n i v e r s a l s and an e x p l a n a t o r y

model o f l i n g u i s t i c s .

Page 6: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and
Page 7: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I s i n c e r e l y t h a n k t h e Canadian Commonwealth S c h o l a r s h i p

a n d F e l l o w s h i p Committee f o r g i v i n g me t h i s o p p o r t u n i t y t o

t r a v e l t o Canada and s t u d y a t t h i s u n i v e r s i t y , and t h e C e n t r a l

I n s t i t u t e of E n g l i s h and F o r e i g n Languages (Hyderabad , I n d i a ) ,

f o r g r a n t i n g me l e a v e o f a b s e n c e from my work f o r t h e d u r a t i o n

o f my s t u d i e s .

To t h e members o f my S u p e r v i s o r y Commit tee , P r o f e s s o r s

N . J . L i n c o l n and R . C . DeArmond, I am g r a t e f u l f o r t h e i r comments

and encouragement and t h e p a t i e n c e w i t h which t h e y have g u i d e d

me t h r o u g h o u t . P r o f e s s o r H . F . S c h i f f m a n has been o f i n v a l u a b l e

h e l p , n o t o n l y i n s u g g e s t i n g a f r u i t f u l a r e a f o r r e s e a r c h , b u t

a l s o i n s e c u r i n g f o r me r e f e r e n c e m a t e r i a l s which were u n a v a i l a b l e

a t t h i s U n i v e r s i t y .

Among t h e members of t h e f a c u l t y a t t h i s U n i v e r s i t y who have

c o n t r i b u t e d i n v a r i o u s wa!.s t o my a p p r e n t i c e s h i p i n L i n g u i s t i c s ,

ment ion must be made of P r o f e s s o r A . E . H u r t a d o , who w i t h h i s

e n t h u s i a s m and uncompromising s t a n d a r d s s t i m u l a t e d my i n t e r e s t

i n t h e s u b j e c t ; and of P r o f e s s o r B . E . Nelqton, whom I have

u n h e s i t a t i n g l y app roached f o r h e l p w i t h problems i n S e m a n t i c s .

F i n a l l y , I wish t o t hank W Y L B U R , t h e computer who w r o t e

o u t t h i s t h e s i s f o r me s o n e a t l y .

Page 8: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

TABLE CONTENTS

Approval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii A b s t r a c t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i i i D e d i c a t i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v

Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v i

L i s t of T a b l e s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v i i i

P r e f a c e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i x

Kannada Phonemes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x i i i

C h a p t e r I . I n t r o d u c t i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

Chap te r I 1 - Neg i n Kannada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1

Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47

Chap te r I 1 1 . The Yyntax of A l l a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2

Chap te r I V . I l l a and t h e N e g a t i v e V e r b a l P a r t i c i p l e ... 76

Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92

C h a p t e r V . On t h e s e m a n t i c s of n e g a t i o n i n Kannada .... 9 3

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Notes 106

C h a p t e r V I . Conc lus ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108

B i b l i o g r a p h y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116

v i i

Page 9: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

L I S T OF TABLES

Table I - Kannada Phonemes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x i i i

Table I 1 - Negat ive forms with i l l a ..................... 9 0

Page 10: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

PREFACE

Kannada ( a l s o known a s Kanarese) i s a m a j o r D r a v i d i a n

l anguage spoken ma in ly i n K a r n a t a k a , I n d i a . V a r i e t i e s of

Kannada e x i s t a l o n g t h e r e g i o n a l , s o c i a l a n d l i t e r a r y -

c o l l o q u i a l c l i n e s , t h e ma jo r r e g i o n a l d i a l e c t a l d i f f e r e n c e

b e i n g be tween t h e ' n c r t h e r n ' v a r i e t i e s ( c e n t e r i n g a r o u n d

Dharwar) and t h e ' s o u t h e r n ' v a r i e t i e s ( c e n t e r i n g a round

B a n g a l o r e ) .

I n t h i s t h e s i s , we u n d e r t a k e an e x a m i n a t i o n o f n e g a t i o n

and r e l a t e d a s p e c t s o f t h e s t a n d a r d e d u c a t e d s p e e c h o f t h e

Brahmin d i a l e c t i n B a n g a l o r e . The s y n t a x o f t h i s v a r i e t y o f

Kannada shows no ma jo r d e v i a t i o n s f rom t h a t o f t h e ( s o u t h e r n )

l i t e r a r y l a n g u a g e ; however , o u r d a t a may be s a i d t o be s p e e c h -

b a s e d , i n s o f a r a s a r c h a i c forms which may b e p r e s e r v e d i n

some s t y l e s o f t h e l i t e r a r y l anguage ( e . g . , t h e c o n j u g a t i o n o f

v e r b s i n t h e ' n e g a t i v e ' mood) a r e n o t t a k e n i n t o c o n s i d e r a t i o n

h e r e .

The s y s t e m of t r a n s c r i p t i o n a d o p t e d h e r e , however , does

n o t f o l l o w t h e spoken forms i n t h e l a n g u a g e , which show

c h a r a c t e r i s t i c e l i s i o n s , a s s i m i l a t i o n s and s o o n , a s such a

p h o n e t i c o r n e a r - p h o n e t i c t r a n s c r i p t i o n would t e n d t o o b s c u r e

m o r p h o l o g i c a l b o u n d a r i e s and r e l a t i o n s h i p s . Our c h o i c e o f

m o r p h o l o g i c a l c l a r i t y i n t r a n s c r i p t i o n , r a t h e r t h a n p h o n e t i c

f a i t h f u l n e s s , h a s been d e t e r m i n e d by t h e main c o n c e r n s o f t h i s

t h e s i s , which a r e s y n t a c t i c and s e m a n t i c r a t h e r t h a n p h o n o l o g i c a l

o r p h o n e t i c . The t r a n s c r i p t i o n c l o s e l y f o l l o w s , t h e r e f o r e , t h e

Page 11: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

o r t h o g r a p h i c r e p r e s e n t a t i o n i n t h e l i t e r a r y l anguage . Where

c l a r i t y o f e x p o s i t i o n demands a d e v i a t i o n from even t h e

o r t h o g r a p h y , s u c h a d e v i a t i o n i s e n c l o s e d w i t h i n p a r e n t h e s e s ;

and morpheme b o u n d a r i e s n o t i n d i c a t e d i n t h e o r t h o g r a p h y a r e

i n d i c a t e d , where n e c e s s a r y , w i t h a ( - ) . Thus t h e form f o r

' d i d n o t come' , pronounced [ b a r l i l l a ] and w r i t t e n b a r a l i l l a ,

i s t r a n s c r i b e d a s b a r a l ( u ) - i l l a , a s t h e f a c t t h a t t h i s form

i s composed o f t h e i n f i n i t i v e b a r a l u of t h e v e r b b a r - , ' t o come' , - p l u s t h e n e g a t i v e morpheme i l l a , i s c r u c i a l t o t h e a n a l y s i s .

A phoneme c h a r t f o r Kannada i s p r o v i d e d below, i n Tab le I .

The s e r i e s o f r e t r o f l e x consonan t s i s t r a n s c r i b e d w i t h c a p i t a l

l e t t e r s , i n t h e examples ; e l s e w h e r e , i f t h e s e consonan t s o c c u r

i n names o r terms f o r which a s t a n d a r d , a c c e p t e d E n g l i s h

s p e l l i n g i s a v a i l a b l e , t h i s s t a n d a r d s p e l l i n g i s u s e d . Thus

t h e name Kannada i s t r a n s c r i b e d a s kanna3a ( w i t h a r e t r o f l e x

[Dl) i n t h e examples , b u t c i t e d as Kannada e l s e w h e r e .

P h o n e t i c a l l y p r e d i c t a b l e w o r d - i n i t i a l g l i d e s a r e o m i t t e d from

t h e t r a n s c r i p t i o n , i n s o f a r as t h e o r t h o g r a p h y a l s o omi t s them;

t h u s ' good' ( a t t r i b u t i v e ) , pronounced [voLLe] and w r i t t e n

oLLeya, i s t r a n s c r i b e d oLLeya. Long vowels a r e i n d i c a t e d by

d o u b l i n g a l e t t e r , e . g . , b e e r e [ b e : r e ] , ' d i f f e r e n t ' ; s o a l s o

geminate c o n s o n a n t s : e . , i l l ' h e r e ' , ili 'mouse ' . The

a c c u s a t i v e c a s e end ing i s o f t e n dropped i n spoken , and some

w r i t t e n , v a r i e t i e s o f Kannada; we e n c l o s e t h i s end ing w i t h i n

p a r e n t h e s e s , e . g . k e l a s a ( v a n n u ) , 'work ( a c c . ) ' .

Page 12: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

The model o f a n a l y s i s we f o l l o w i s t h e T r a n s f o r m a t i o n a l -

G e n e r a t i v e model a s i n t r o d u c e d by Chomsky i n S y n t a c t i c

S t r u c t u r e s (1957) , and Aspects o f t h e Theory o f S y n t a x (1965) ,

w i t h i t s s u b s e q u e n t m o d i f i c a t i o n s and e l a b o r a t i o n s (Chomsky

1970 , 1971, 1975; Emonds 1976) . We t h e r e f o r e a c c e p t an

i n t e r p r e t i v i s t view of s e m a n t i c s and o u r d i s c u s s i o n o f t h e

s e m a n t i c s of n e g a t i o n i n Kannada w i l l f o l l o w t h e model o f

J a c k e n d o f f (1972) , t h e s t a n d a r d e x p o s i t i o n of s e m a n t i c i n t e r -

p r e t a t i o n w i t h i n t h i s framework. While we do n o t assume t h a t

t a d e s c r i p t i o n o f Kannada s h o u l d be p o s s r b l e a s a m a t t e r o f

c o u r s e , w i t h t h e d e s c r i p t i v e a p p a r a t u s p r o v i d e d by t h i s model

- a model v a l i d a t e d , n o t w i t h s t a n d i n g i t s g o a l s and i t s c l a i m s

of u n i v e r s a l i t y , p r i m a r i l y by a s y s t e m a t i c e x p l o r a t i o n o f

non-Drav id ian ( and l a r g e l y Indo-European) languages - we do

r e c o g n i s e t h e n e c e s s i t y o f working w i t h i n a paradigm and a

model t h a t has been p o w e r f u l l y a rgued f o r and i s now g e n e r a l l y

a c c e p t e d w i t h i n l i n g u i s t i c s , i f on ly t o s y s t e m a t i c a l l y r e f u t e

o r modify i ts de t a i 1 s .

Very l i t t l e work on Kannada s y n t a x i s a v a i l a b l e w i t h i n

t h e T r a n s f o r m a t i o n a l - G e n e r a t i v e framework, a n o t a b l e e x c e p t i o n

b e i n g Nadkarni ( 1 9 7 0 ) . Although t h e p u b l i c a t i o n o f t h e

I n t e r n a t i o n a l J o u r n a l of D r a v i d i a n L i n g u i s t i c s has s e r v e d a s

a u s e f u l s t i m u l u s t o r e s e a r c h i n t h i s a r e a s i n c e 1972, t h e

problem o f v a r i o u s r e s e a r c h e r s a c c e p t i n g v a r i o u s t h e o r i e s and

models , t h u s making i x a n i n g f u l d i a l o g u e be tween them i m p o s s i b l e ,

remains a c u t e . Nega t ion i n Kannada s e r v e s a s a c a s e i n p o i n t :

Page 13: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

t h e r e e x i s t ' t r a d i t i o n a l ' d e s c r i p t i o n s (Andronov, 1969 ;

S p e n c e r , l g l 4 ) , taxonomic d e s c r i p t i o n s (Gowda, 1 9 7 0 ) , and

g e n e r a t i v e - s e m a n t i c d e s c r i p t i o n s (Rangan, 1972) o f t h i s a r e a .

One aim of t h i s t h e s i s , t h e r e f o r e , i s t o p r o v i d e a

d e t a i l e d though p r e l i m i n a r y d e s c r i p t i o n of n e g a t i o n i n Kannada

w i t h i n a s t a n d a r d t h e o r e t i c a l framework, i n t h e hope of

s t i m u l a t i n g argument and f u r t h e r r e s e a r c h w i t h i n t h i s model ,

i n t o t h e Kannada l anguage . I t goes w i t h o u t s a y i n g t h a t much

t h a t a p p e a r s ad hoc o r i n s o l v a b l e h e r e , may be b e t t e r d e a l t

w i t h i n a d e e p e r o r w i d e r a n a l y s i s . On a d i f f e r e n t l e v e l , by

a n a l y s i n g a s p e c t s o f a language whose d a t a have n o t been

a v a i l a b l e t o l i n g u i s t s i n t h e c o u r s e o f model c o n s t r u c t i o n , we

hope t o v a l i d a t e o r q u e s t i o n t h e model i t s e l f . T h i s i s

t h e r e f o r e a s m a l l c o n t r i b u t i o n towards t h e s e a r c h f o r l i n g u i s t i c

u n i v e r s a l s and a n e x p l a n a t o r y model c f l i n g u i s t i c s .

Page 14: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

xiii

Page 15: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

CHAPTER I

INTFODUCTION

1.0 T r a d i t i c n a l G r a m m a r i a n s h a v e o f t e n c l a s s e d a s

' n s g a t i v e ' a v a r i e t y o f w o r d s i n ths l a n g u a g s w h i c h were

i n t u i t i v e l y f e l t t o h a v e soEe c e g a t i v o m e a n i n g . T h u s pr?-

T r a n s f o r m a t i o n a l G e n e r a t i v e g r a m m a r s of E n g l i s h h a v e

i ~ c l u d ~ d h a r d l y a n d c e v e r w i t h a s ' a d v ~ r b s of i a o d a l i t y

~ x p r e s s i n g n e g a t i o n 1 , c h a r a c t e r i s e d feu a s * d i s t i n c t l y

n e g a t i v e 1 , a n d n o n e a s t h e ' n e g a t i v e f o r @ o f o o f l ; a n d

s t a t e d t h a t ' n e g a t i o n is a l s o i m p l i e d i n e x p r e s s i o n s w i t h

too ( ' s h e is t o o poor t o g i v e US a n y t h i n g , i , e , s h e c a n n o t * ) ' .

Many of t h e s e ' n e g a t i v e ' e x p r e s s i o n s h a v e b e e n s a i d t o b e

1 ' i n c o m p l e t e l y * or ' s p e c i a l 1 y * o r ' i n h e r e n t l y 1 n e g a t i v e ,

T h e t a s k t h a t K l i m a u n d e r t o o k i n t h e f i r s t

s y s t e m a t i c e x a m i n a t i o n of n e g a t i o n within a T r a n s f o r m a t i o n a l

G e n e r a t i v e f r a m e w o r k (Klisa: 1 9 6 4 ) was t o e x a m i n e w h e t h e r

there was $*any r e a s o n t o c o n s i d e r t h e i n t u i t e d s h a r e d

r e g a t i v e n e s s a s i n g l e f e a t u r e frcm a f o r m a l p o f c t of v i ewt t

( o p - c i t . , p . 2 5 0 ) . I t i s n o t e n o u g h f o r a g rammar t o

p r o v i d e a list o f e x p r e s s i o n s wh5ch a r e ' i n t u i t i v e l y

Page 16: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

c z g a t i v e q ; c s ~ o f ths g c a l s of t ~ a n s f o r m a t i o r ~ a l g rammr is

t o p r c v i d e a systematic f c r m a l l s a t i o n or t h e facts of the

l a c g u a g e w h i c h f o r i s t h ~ b a s i s f c r t h ~ n a t i v e s p ~ a k e r ' s

i n t u i t i o n of r e l a t i o n s h i p s between l i n g u i s t i c f o ras . G i v e n

the n a t l v e s p e a k e r q s i c t u i t i v e k ~ o w l e d g e , h o w e v e r , t h e r e is

n o way o f i n t u i t i n g how e x a c t l y t h i s k n o w l e d g e s h o u l d be

e x p r e s s e d ic a g r a m t a r ; t h i s is a n e m p i r i c a l m a t t e r .

G r a m m a t 5 c a l a n a l y s e s h a v e t o be m o t i v a t e d , a ~ d t h e y a r e

s u b j e c t +o t h e c o n s t r a i n t s a n d e v a l u a t i o n m e a s u r e s of the

linguistic t h e o r y w h i c h h a s p r o v i d e d a n o d e 1 f o r t h e

a n a l y s e s . T h e c o n c e p t o f t h e s i m p l i c i t y of a g rammar

( l a r g e l y e q u a t e d w i t h Etconorrtg i ~ . t h e u s e o f s y m b o l s ) h a s ,

sif ce t h e i n c e p t i o c of T r a c s f o r m a t i o n a l G e n e r a t i v e grammar ,

s e r v e d a s a c r u c i a l e v a l u a t i o r R e a s u r G ; a n d th3 p o s s i b i l i t y

of s i m p l i f y i n g t h e s y n t a x by s h o w l n g t h a t a f f i r m a t i v e a n 2

f i e g a t i v e s e n t e n c e s r e g u l a r l y d i f f e r i n a s i n g l e f e a t u r e , a n d

therefcre do n o t requi re s e p a r a t e a n d u n r e l a t e d r u l e s f c r

t h e i r g e L e r a t i o n , is t h u s a n a t t r a c t i v e o n e . T h e q u e s t i o n

Kliiaa a s k s is,", . . ir, t h e s t r u c t u r a l d e s c r i p t i c n of t h e

s e n t e n c e s of t h e l a c g u a g e a s p r o v i d e d b y t h e g r a m m a r r u l e s

t h a t genera te t h e m , Is i t t h e c a s e t h a t a s i n g l e s y m b o l

a c c o u n t s f o r c e r t a i n l i n g u i s t i c f a c t s a t t h e v e r y p l a c e s

w h e r e n o g a t i v e n e s s is i ~ t u i t e d ? ~ ' (0p .c i . t . , p .250 .)

Page 17: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

K l i m a t h e r e f o r e s c u g h t t c c h a r a c t o r i s e i n

g r a m m a t i c a l terms, an a p p r o a c h which e n t a i l e d t r a n s f o r m a t i o n s

c h a ~ g i n g t h e s h a p e 05 l e x i c a l i t ems ( e , g . , Meg-

i n c c r p c r a t i o n i ~ t o I n d e f i r i i t s s . ) L a t e r m o d i f i c a t i o n s i n

tke ~ ~ F C T Y , - a s2t of c o c s t r a i n t s kncwn a s t h e Extended

L ~ x i c a l H y p o t h e s i s , - p r o p o s e d t c oxcfuae s u c h p r o c e s s e s

frcm t h e power of t r a n s f o r m a t i o e s . Moreover , some p r o b l e m s

o f s e ~ a n t i c i n t e r p r e t a t i o n , i n v o l v i n g t h e sccpe cf n e g a t i o n

a n d q u a r t i f i e r s , r o a a i n e d . J a c k e n d o f f (1972) t h e r e f o r e

p r e f e r r e d t o c h a r a c t e r i s e res s e m a n t i c a l l y , a s a s o d a 1

o p e r a t o r , T h e w o r d s which h a d beea shown t o b e h a v e a s ceg

by Klima and r e q u i r e d N e g - i n c o r p o r a t i o n

neg + a n y --> co ( o b l i g a t o r y )

neg + e v e r --> n e v e r ( o b l i g a t o r y ) 1

would be g e n e r a t e d b y t h e gramBar l i k e o t h e r l e x i c a l

iteats, s y n t a c t i c a l l y b e l o n g i n g t o v a r i o u s c l a s s e s : *'The

o n l y s y c t a c t i c f a c t o r i n the d i s t r i b u t i o n of these l e x i c a l

items will b e l e x i c a l c a t e g o r y ; t h e o t h e r aspects of

d i s t r i b u t i o n o b s e r v e d by Kl ima will be a c c o u n t e d f o r by

z e m a c t i c rul~." ( J a c k e n d o f f , o p - c i t , , p, 3 4 8 . ) This a p p r o a c h

Page 18: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

c r s u r e s t h a t n e g a t i v e s will r 'ot be s z p a r a t = l y t r e a t e d by the

s y n t a x , t h e r e b y a v o i d i n g c o m p l i c a t i o n i n t h e s y n t a x a n d , a s

n e g a t i v e s a r e r e q u i r e d t o s h a r e a s e m a n t i c m a r k e r , t h e modal

o p e r a t o r m, t h e grammar w i l l f o r m a l i s e , i n t h e s e m a n t i c

c o f f p ~ n @ r t , t h e ~ a t i v e s p e a k e r ' s i n t u i t i o n s c c n c e r c i c g

r e g a t i v i t y.

I n f o r m a l l y c a p t u r i n g t h s n o t i o n o f c e g a t i v i t y i n a

d i f f e r e n t c o B p o n e n t t h a n Kl ima , h o u e v 2 r , J a c k e n d ~ f f d o e s n o t

r e l i n q u i s h t h e f o r m a l c h a r a c t e r i s a t i o n of PI! s u g g e s t e d b y

P l i m a ; c o t i n g t h a t w o r d s w i t h t h e raodal o p e r a t o r nes behav?

d i f f e r z n t l y from f i x h e r ~ n t l y n e g a t i v e f w o r d s l i k e * d o u b t t 31

' d i s l i k e * , which d o n o t p a s s K l i m a g s t e s t s f o r s e n t e n c e

c e g a t i c n , h e c a u t i o c s a g a i n s t a d o p t i n g t h e i dea cf t h ~ 2

s e m a n t i c m a r k e r "tot g l i f t l y w ( c p - c l t . , p . 3 4 2 ) , T h e n e e d t o

f o r m a l l y c h a r a c t e r i s e nes t h u s r e ~ a i n s , w h e t h e r n e g is tc b e

t r e a t e d a s a g r a ~ m a t i c a l f e a t u r e o r a s a moda l c p e r a t o r .

Page 19: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

1.1 I n K a ~ c a d a , a number o f l e x i c a l i t ems b e h a v e a s

n s (where ~ , e a Is a f o r m a l o b j e c t t o b e d e f i c e d b e l o w ) ,

b u t a n y a t t e m p t t o t r e a t nea a s a g r a m a a t i c a l featnre which

is tc b e i n c o r p o r a t e d i n t o these l e x i c a l items by a

t r a s s f c r m a t i o n b e c o a e s v e r y p r c b l e m a t i c , Re w i l l t h e r e f o r e

a d o p t J a c k e n d o f f I s s t a n c e it t r e a t i n g neq a s a modal

c p e r a t c r , w h i l e p r c p o s i n g a f o r m a l t e s t fcr tea on t h e

l i n e s o f K l i m a l s a n a l y s i s . S u c h a c h a r a c t e r i s a t i o n o f

will s E r v e t o d e l i m i t t h e r a n q e o f d a t a t h a t m u s t b e t a k e n

i n t o a c c o u n t i r . a n e x a ~ i n a t i o n o f n e g a t i o n i n K a m a d a .

B e f o r e we p r o c e e d w i t h t h i s d e l i m i t a t i o n , we may

c i t e t h e v a r i e t y of p h r a s e s a n d s e n t e n c e s w h i c h E a v s been

r - o t e d b y g r a m m a r i a n s a s h a v i n g a * n e g a t i v e 8 mean ing , I n t h e

l ist of s u c h phrases a c d s e n t e n c e s be low, the e l e m e n t s

c a n t r i b u t i n g t o * n e g a t i v i t y t h a v e b ~ e n u n d e r l i n e d :

1, a v a n u oLLeyavanu a11a. he good man n o t

H e i s n o t a good Ran,

2. a v a n u illi i l l a . h e here is n o t

He is n o t h ~ r e ,

Page 20: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

3a. a v a c u b a r u v u d ( u ) -ills. h e come ( p a r t i c i p i a 1) cot

He d o e s n c t ccme/ will n o t come.

3 b , a v a n u b a r a l f u ) -ills, be come ( i ~ f i n i t i v e ) not

He d i d n o t cme.

3 c . a v a n u b a r u t t fa ) -ills. he c0mir .g ria t

He is n o t c o m i n g ,

3d. a v a n u b a r u t t (a) - i r a l l u ) -ills. h e c o m i n g b e (in•’ i ~ i t i v e ) not

He was n o t c o a i n g / H e d i d tot u s e to come.

3e. a v a n u band (n) -ills. b e h a v i n g coiite n o t

Re h a s n o t come,

3 3 f . a v a o u b a n d ( u ) - i r a l ( u ) - i l l a . h e h a v i n g come b~ (in•’ i n i t i v e ) n o t

He had n o t come.

4. a v a n u k e l a s a ( v a n n u ) a a - b a n d a n u . he work (acc.) d o i ~ g w i t h o u t cams

H e came w i t h o u t d o i n g t h e work.

5 , a v a c u a a a D - a k e l a s a h e done n o t work

The work t h a t h~ d i d R o t / dces n o t do

6a. k e l a s a ( v a ~ n u ) maaD-ad la) - a v a n u work ( a c c . ) d o n e n o t h e

He who d i d n o t / does cot do ths work

Page 21: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

6 k , k e l a s a ( v a c n u ) n~aaD-a2 [a) -&vaLu wcrk (acc.) dens n o t s h e

s h e who d i d r a t / d o e s c o t d o t h o w c r k

7 a . ii k ~ l a s a ( v a c n u ) maaDa - kuuDadu. t h i s work (acc.) d o s h o u l d n o t / m u s t n o t

(You) m u s t not/ s h o u l r l n c t d o t h i s work.

7b. li k e l a s a ( v a r , n u ) maaDa - B a a r a d u , + h i s work ( a c c . ) d c s h ~ u l d not/ m u s t nct

(you) m u s t not/ should n o t d o t h i s work.

7c, ii k e l a s a ( v a n n u ) ~ a a D a - W. t h i s work (acc.) do d o n o t

Do not d o t h i s work ,

8. ii k e l a s a 2 - s a a h h a v a / a ~ , - n y a a y a . t k i s work i m p o s s i b l e u n j u s t

T h i s work is impossible / u n j u s t ,

9 a . a v a c u h a a D i d a n ( u ) -ee h o r a t u kul r l iya l (u) -ills. fie s a c g c o ~ j u n c t i v e p a r t . a a n c e ( i n f i n i t i v e ) n o t

H e sacg, b u t d i d n o t d a n c e .

9 b , a v a n u h a a D i d a n u , a s h T e e h o r a t u a v a n u k u M i y a l (u) - i l l a . h e s a n g c o n j n n c t Z v e p a r t , h e dance ( i n • ’ .) n o t

He s a n g , b u t h e d i d n o t d a n c e ,

Most t r a d i t i o n a l , a n d soiae r e c e n t , a n l l y s e s o f

c e g a t i o n i n Kannada men t io r , t h e forms i n I - ) , (e.q,,

S p e n c e r ( 1 9 1 4 ) . Andronov ( l 9 6 9 ) , a n d Gowda ( 1 9 7 0 ) ) a n d some

( S p e n c e r a n d Andronov , o p . c i t , ) m e n t i o n f o r m s r-ct c i t e d i n

Page 22: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

( 1 - 9 ) - ~ l t h ~ u g t AnZronov a n d Gouda a t t e m p t f u r t h e r a n a l y s i s

o f these f o r m s , t h q n a t u r r cf t h i s a n a l y s i s is p r i m a r i l y

t a x o n o ~ i c , t h u s l e a d i n g i c t o precissly t h e s i t u a t i o n t h a t

S c h i f f mar! (1 974: 9) , d i s c u s s i n g n e g a t i v e f crms i n noc-Brahmin

T a ~ i l , werns a g a i c s t : "ghat i s cct c e e d ~ C . . . is a

p r o l i f e r a t i o n o f p a r a d i g m s , & l a c l a s s i c a f g rammar , l i s t i n g

a l l t h e k i n d s of n e g a t i v e s t h a t a r e p o s s i b l e . P a r a d i g m s d o

r.ot e x p l a i n a n y t h i ~ g . . ." From t h e p o i n t of v i e w o f the

l e v e l s of a d e q u a c y ef a grammar , p a r a d i g a s m e r e l y r e a c h ths

l e v e l o f o b s e r v a t i o n a l a d e q u a c y ,

1.2 However, o b s e r v a t i o n a l a d e q u a c y i s zi p r e - r e q u i s i t e

f c r a d e s c r i ~ t i v r l y a d e q u a t e accoufit. A f a i l u r e t o c o n s i d e r

the f u l l r a n g e of d a t a , a n d aE iriccrrect i n t e r p r e t a t i o n

cf t h f bcdy o f d a t a t h a t is t a k e r , i n t o a c c o u n t , r e s u l t s i n

a wcrse s i t u a t i o n t h a n a were list o f n e g a t i v e s :

a c o n f u s i o n a b o u t w h i c h s e n t e n c e s a r e t o be r e l a t e d a s

a f f i r m a t i v e - n e g a t i v e ' p a i r s * . T h u s a recent a r t i c l e

(Rangan: 1972) , t h o u g h on1 y indirectly c o n c e r n e d w i t h Kacnada ,

c i t e s o n l y s e n t e n c e s (3a,b) i n c u r list a b o v e ; ( 3 b ) is

m i s t a k e n l y t r a n s l a t e d a s * h e d i d / d o e s n o t c o a e * a n d , i n a

f c o t n o t e t o w a r d s t h e e c d cf t h e d i s c u s s i o n , ( 3 e ) is m e n t i o n e d ,

Page 23: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

a g a i r t e n t a t i v e l y t r a n s l a t e d a s ( h e d i d n o t comet .

It is t h i s k i n d o f e r r c r w h i c h r n a k ~ s r e l e v a n t S c h i f f r n a c 9 s

c a l l f o r '"af, e v a l u a t i o n p r o c e d u r ~ t o h e l p a s c e r t a i n wher. two

sf n t e n c e s a r e e q u i v a l e n t e x c e p t f o r o n e b e i n g p o s i t i v e , t h e

o t h e r ~ e g a t l v e t ' ( o p . c i t . , p . 9 ) ,

S c h i f f m a n goes o n t c s u g g e s t t h a t t h e a b i l i t y t o

r e l a t e two s e n t e n c e s i n t h i s way is " p e r h a p s a n a r t i f a c t of

W e s t e r n e d u c a t i o n a n d p e r h a p s A r i s t o t e l i a n l o g i c . " To say t h a t

l i n g u i s t s a n d t h e i r n a t i v e - s p e a k e r c o n s u l t a n t s h a v e so f a r

krer unable t o make r e g u l a r c o r r e s p o n d e n c e s b e t w e e n a f f i r m a t i v e

a r d n e g a t i v e s e n t e c c e s i n D r a v i d i a c l a n g u a g e s i s n o t , h o w e v e r ,

t o d f n y t h a t s u c h c o r r s s p o n d o n c e s e x i s t i r t h e l anguage ! It

mus t be r e ~ e m b e r e d t h a t the k i n d of i n t u i t i v ~ k n c w l e d g ~ t h a t a

t r a n s f o r m a t i o n a l g raBmar a i ~ s t o c a p t u r e , is t h a t cf t h r i d e a l

c a t i v e s p e a k e r . The l i n g u i s t , t h e r e f o r e , m u s t a b s t r a c t f rom

errors of p e r f o r m a n c e , l o g i c , or e v e n t r a n s l a t i o c , c o n s i d e r i n g

t b a t much r e c e n t work i n D r a v i d i a n l i n g u i s t i c s , b e i n g v r i t t e c

fn Engf i s h , r e q u i r e s t h e t r a n s l a t i c n o f e x a m p l e s . One way tc

a v c i d the l a s t k i n d of e r r o r is t o s y s t e m a t i c a l l y a n a l y s e t h e

c c c s t i + u e n t s of t h e s e n t ~ n c e i n t c a b s t r a c t s y m b o l s a n d l o o k

for c o r r e s p o n d e n c e s a n d r e g u l a r i t i e s i n terms o f t h e s e s y m b o l s

r a t h e r t h a n i n t e r n s o f E n g l i s h t r a n s l a t i o n s , which c a n a t b e s t

he a p p r c x i m a t i o n s t c t h e f o r m s cf t h o l a c g u a g e i~ q u e s t i o n .

Page 24: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

the s i t u a t i o n i n Kanaada, a t least i n t h e d i a l e c t u n d e r

c o n s i d e r a t i o n , is n o t u n r e s o l v a b l e , and t h a t a f f i r m a t i v e a n d

n e g a t i v e s e n t e c c ~ s c a E be r e g u l a r l y r e l a t e d i n t h e s y n t a x . We

c l a i m t h a t , a p a r t from Errors af d a t a a n d t r a c s l z t i c c , a

f a i l u r e t o c h a r a c t e r i s e P I ~ x p l i c i t l y and a c o c f u s i o n cf

p a r a p h r a s e r e l a t i o n s h i p s w i t h syntactic r e l a t i o n s h i p s , h a s

l e d t o a c a p p a r e n t l y u c r e s o l v a b l e s i t u a t i o n . I n C h a p t e r 111

we d i s c u s s the f o u r s e n t e n c e s (10-13) b e l o u :

1 0 , a v a n u aaauSHyanu. he an

Re is a man.

11 . a v a n u nanuSHyanu a l l a . he man n o t

Ee is n o t a man.

12. a v a n u manuSHyac (u ) - a a g i i d d a a n e , he man pred.N/ a d v . m a r k e r be 3 r d p.m.sg.

fle is a man.

13. Eivapu mar,uSHyac ( u ) - a a g i i l l a . he &an pred.N/ adv. m a r k e r n o t

H e is n o t a aan.

We show t h a t w h i l e t h e s e m a n t i c r e l a t i o n s h i p between

(10 ,12) and ( l l , l 3 ) h a s l e d t o s o a e c o n f u s i o n a b o u t how

s e n t e n c e s (10-73) are t o be r e l a t e d , t h e a t t e m p t t o

Page 25: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

f o r m u l a t e e x p l i c i t r u l e s f o r t h e g e n e r a t i o n cf s e n t e n c e s

r e v e a l s t h a t o n l y the p a i r s ( 1 0 , 1 1 ) a n d ( 1 2 , 1 3 ) a r e t o b e

related s y n t a c t i c a l l y , a n d t k a t n o s y n t a c t i c r e l a t i o n s h i p

h o l d s bctwefr? t h e p a i r s (10.13) a n d (17.12) , a l t h o u g h s u c h

a r e l a t i o n s h i p may be i f f e r r f d from p r e v i o u s a n a l y s e s .

We w i l l a l s o show t h a t t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n of t h e

l e x i c a l items we w i l l d e f i n e a s is c o c d i t i o n e d by t h e

s y n t a c t i c s t r u c t u r e of t h e s ~ n t e ~ c e i n w h i c h t h e neq o c c u r s .

T h u s t $ ~ form a f l a a p p p a r s ic c o p u l a t i v s s e c t e n c f s w h i c h a r e

o b l i g a t o r i l y v e r b l e s s , i l l a a p p e a r s i n t h e Verb P h r a s e vEan

TENSE is p r e s e n t , and a fcrla s u c h a s i n (4) fnaaD-adee

a p p e a r s i n a d v e r b i a l s a n d i n t e n s e l e s s ( i n f i n i t i v a l a n d

g e r u n d i a l ) s e n t e n c e s . Before we e n t e r i n t o t h i s a n a l y s i s ,

h o w e v e r , a b r i e f r e v i e w o f w h a t Kannada g r a m m a r s h a v e

s a i d a b c u t t h e forms i n (1-9) w i l l s e r v e t o p r o v i d e

t h e n e c e s s a r y b a c k g r c u r d f o r o u r a n a l y s i s ,

Page 26: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

1 . 3 T r a d i t i o c a i n& t i v t y r a ~ m a r i a r ~ s of Kannada

h a v e c l a s s e d ilk a n d a f l a (cf. (1-3) a b o v e ) a s

5 k r i y a a t m a k a - a v y a y a , o r ' v e r b - l i k e i n d e c l i n a b l e s * ; n o

m e n t i o n i s wade of t h e i r n e g a t i v f t y . I n a b r i e f b u t f a i r l y

c o r n p r e k ~ ~ slve g r a r e a a r o f Kafizada, B E ~ ? ~ L C V (1969) d e v o t ~ s

a c h a p t e r t c ' N e g a t i v e F o r a s ' , w h i c h h e s u b c l a s s e s i n t o

' a n a l y t i c f o r m s ' acd ' s y n t h e t i c f o r m s ' . A s a n example o f

a n a n a l y t i c a l n e g a t i v e , h e d i s c u s s e s i l l a b u t d o e s o o t

m e n t i o r . a l l a . S p e n c e r (1914) a n d Gowda (1970) m e n t i o n

b o t h a l l a a n d i l i , a n d S p e n c e r d e v o t e s a s e c t i o n t o

a d i s c u s s i o n of t h e i r d i s t r i b u t i o n . Ve h a v e m e n t i o n e d a b o v e

t h a t the a p p e a r a n c e cf d i f f e r e c t c e g a t i v e s is c o n d i t i o n e d

b y t h e s y n t a c t i c s t r u c t u r e o f t h e s a n t e n c e . I n C h a p t e r 111,

we w i l l c o n s i d e r t h e e x p l a c a t i o ~ s o f S p ~ n c e r a n d Gowda

f o r t h e b e h a v i o u r o f i 1 1 a a n d a l l 8 i n s o m e d e t a i l .

Andronov m e n t i o n s t h e f o r m s i n (4-6) a b c v e a s

' s y n t h e t i c * c e g a t i v e s . He d o e s n o t d i s c u s s t h e m , m e r e l y

s t a t i n g t h a t t h e y "are u s e d i n t h e saBe way a s a f f i r m a t i v e

p a r t i c i p l e s H ( o p . c i t . , p. 62) . S p e n c e r a n d t r a d i t i o n a l

n a t i v e g r a i a m a r i a n s of Kannada h a v e a l s o n o t e d t h e s e f o r m s ,

a r d u s e d s imi l a r n o m e n c l a t u r e s f o r them. T h u s maaD-adee

i n ( 4 ) is c a l l e d a ' n e g a t i v e v e r k a l p a r t i c i p l e * by Andronov

a n d S p c c c e r . N a t i v e g r a a a a t i c a l t r a d i t i o n h a s c h a r a c t e r i s e d

Page 27: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

tkesc f c r m s a s k r i v a a n y a u ~ a , b u t mad^ nc d i s t i n c t i a r i b e t w e n

a f f i r m a t i v e a n d n e g a t i v e k r i Y a d n y u u n a The fo rm &aaD-ada

i n 15) is a ' n e g a t i v e p a r t i c i p l e 9 a c c o r d i c g t o Andronov, a

n e g a t i v e r e l a t i v e p a r t i c i p l e a c c o r d i n g t o S p a c c e r ; a g a i n ,

native g r a w t n a t i c a l t r a d i t i o ~ makes no d i s t i n c t i c n betwoan

a f f i r a a t i v e a n d n e g a t i v e k r i d v a a c h i (i. e . r e l a t i v e p a r t i c i p l e s ) ,

The forms ir? ( 6 ) -- ntaaD-adia l -avanu, etc. -- h a v e

beer, c a l l e d l r r i n a a s a , o r p a r t i c i p i a l n o u n s , I n h i s a r t i c l e ,

Gowda d o e s n o t m e n t i o n t h e s e f o r m s a p a r t f rom t h o s e i n ( 5 ) ;

quite j u s t i f i a b l y , i t s e e a s , since t h e o n l y d i f f e r e n c e between

t h e forms i n 15) a n d ( 6 ) (maall-ada k e l a s a , maaD-ad faJ a v a n u )

' t h e n o t - d o n e work ' , ' t h e n o t - d o n e h e * , is t h e o c c u r r e n c e o f

a pror.cur. ava: ' h e ' ir! ( 6 ) , a s a g a i c s t t h e n o u n k e l a s a 'wcrkf

6 in (5) . Thus , S p e n c e r n o t e s t h a t n e g a t i v e p a r t i c i p i a l n o u n s

a r e f c r m e d f r o s n e g a t i v e r e l a t i v e p a r t i c i p l e s ,

The f o r m s ir i (7) a r e n o t m e n t i o n e d b y Andronov; we

w i l l c a l l t h e m ' n e g a t i v e m o d a l s g , f o r e a s e of r e f e r e n c e ,

Gcwda m e r t i c n s t h e s e a s # f r e e 1 c f g a t i v e e l e m e n t s , b u t d o e s

n o t d i s c u s s them, e x c e p t t o s t a t e t h a t t h e y a r e u s e d w i t h

t h e i c f i n i t i v e s of v e r b s , a n d t h a t "kuuDadu is more e a p h a t i c

t h a r , b a a r a d u w ( o p , c i t . , p , 2) . C o c c e r n i n g beeDa, h e n o t e s t h a t

Page 28: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

w h i l e "ills a n d a l l & m a y ba s a i d t o n e g a t e i r d i c a t i v e s e n t e n c e s ,

1:eeDa regates i m p e r a t i v e s e n t e n c e s . BeeD8 i s t h e exact

o p p c s i t e of b e e k u , war.t . . (i t) c a n a l s o b e u s e d w i t h

i a f i n i t i v e s t o p r o h i b i t a n y a c t i o n ' ' ( l o c . c i t , ) ,

A l t h o u g h n o n e o f t h e t h r e e g r a ~ m a r i a n s ue a re

d i s c u s s i r g m e n t i o n t h e w o r d s i n 8 ) a b a v e a s ' ~ e g a t i v e * ,

we p r o v i d e t h e & h e r e b ~ c a u s e ( a ) t h e y a r e i n t u i t Z v e l y n e g a t i v e

{b) we h a v e a s y e t n o c r i t e r i a f o r wha t is ' r . e g a t i v e 8 , w h i c h

w i l l e n a b l e u s t o e x c l u d e t h e s e words . T h u s t h e morpheme

a> - may be s a i d t o b e a b o u n d negative f orrmt, i n Gouda's

f r a m e w o r k . t

T h e c o c j u n c t i o n t o r a t u a n d t h ~ c o n j u n c t i v e p h r a s s

ashTe h o r a t u o f t e n t r a n s l a t e a s ' e x c e p t , u n l e s s * , a n d

S p e n c e r s t a t e s t h a t ' * f ~ u n s h i s ( i , e . n a t i v e s c h o l a r s , R A ) a p p e a r

t o r e g a r d h o r a t u a s a negative word. , f o p 4 c i t O , p . l 4 1 ) .

Though S p e c c e r does n o t c a l l t h i s word o r t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g

p h r a s e ' n e g a t i v e * , he does ~ a k e thfir p r e s e n c e dependent on

t h e p r e s e n c e of a n e g a t i v e i n t h e s e n t e n c e : " h o r a t u BUS? a l w a y s

b e f o l l o w e d by a n e g a t i v e p r i n c i p a l v e r b , o r a n i n t e r r o g a t i v e

w h i c h is e q u i v a l e n t i n lnean ing t o a n e g a t i v e " ( p . 1 0 2 ) ;

"if ' i n a d d i t i o n t o * o r ' b e s i d e s * (i.e. h o r a t u , RA) is

c c r i n e c t e d w i t h a p c s i t i v e v e r b , h o r a t u mus t n o t be employed:

Page 29: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

a ' l a d o e ~ u s t b e uszd, . . " (F . 11 9) ; l l a l l a d e e rnedcs ' besides, i n

a d d i t i c n t o ' , a n d is f o i l o w e d by an a f f i r m a t i v e verh. . , 11 (p .155) . Y e w i l l , however , show t h a t s u c h I s c o t t h e c a s e ,

a ~ d t h a t h o r a t u is a c o n j u n c t i o n which w o r k s l i k e t h e

E n g l i s h * b u t i , this b e i n g l o g i c a l l y ~ q u i v a l ~ ~ t t c ' a n d ' ,

i ts u s € b e i n g d e t e r m i n e d s o l e l y by p r a g m a t i c s .

The q u o t e from S p e n c e r c o n c e r n i n g h o r a t u , however ,

b r i n g s u p a n o t h e r i s s u e . He now h a v e a new term ' n e g a t i v e

p r i n c i p a l v e r b * , S p e n c e r a l s o e q u i v a l e n t l y uses t h e term

' p r i n c i p a l v e r b i n a n e g a t i v e f o r m s . From t h e e x a m p l e s h e

p r o v i d e s , i t is e v i d e n t t h a t he is r e f e r r i n g h e r e t o forms

s u c h a s i n (3a-f) a b o v e , where non-finite forms cf a v e r b

a r e f o l l o w e d by i l l a . These f o r n s h a v e t o b e d i f f e r e n t i a t e d

from v e r b s i n t h e ' n e g a t i v e moodg { S p e n c e r , o p . c i t . ) o r t h e

' n e g a t i v e f i n i t e f o r m s o f t h e verbs (Andronov, o p . c i t . ) ,

I c t e r e s t i n g l y e n o u g h , t h e l a t t e r a r e t h e o n l y f o r m s w h i c h

c a t i v e g r a m m a t i c a l t r a d i t i o c h a s r e c o g n i s e d a s n e g a t i v e : 7

t h e c o n j u g a t i o n is c a l l e d r i S H e e d h a - r u u ~ a ( c e g a t i v e farm),

T h e s e f o r m s o f t h e v e r b a r e r a r e l y t o be f o u c d i o t h e

c u r r e c t l a n g u a g e , a n d a r e t h e r r f o r ~ n o t m e n t i o n e d i n o u r

l ist a b o v e . W r i t i n g i n 1914, S p e n c e r n o t e s that " t h e n e g a t i v e

mcod, e x c e p t ic SOW s p e c i a l c a s e s , is c o m p a r a t i v e l y r a r e l y

usedn ( o p . c i t . , p . 4 2 ) . Gowdats a r t i c l e , wri t tef , I n 1970,

Page 30: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

d z e s r o t m e n t i o n t t e s z forms, c o c f i r i ~ g i t s e l f t o "the! most

ccmator,l y u s e d ( n e g a t i v e f e x p r e s s i o n s i11 w r i t t e n Kannadav

{ c p . c i t , , p . 3 ) . S i n c e t h e s a f o r m s a r s r a r e l y mot w i t h o u t s i d e

t h e a l d e r g r a m m a r s of Kazrnada, ar.d s i n c e t h e y are n o t w i t h i n

the s c c p e of PI^ ' c o a p e t c ~ c e ' , W E w i l l not d i s c u s s the@ here,

It i s n o t a t a l l c l e a r , h o w e v e r , i n w h a t s e n s e a

n o c - f i n i t e v e r b plus i l l a is a ' ~ e g a t i v e p r i n c i p a l v e r b ' ;

more s o a s t h e s t a t u s of i l l a h a s b e e n l e f t u c c l e a r , T h u s

S p e n c e r s t a t e s t h a t i l l a i t s e l f (and so a l s o a l l a ) is a f o r m

cf t h e n e g a t i v e mood o f a n o b s o l e t e v e r b : "ills is an

a b b r e v i a t e d f c r a of t h e n e g a t i v e mood, t h i r d p e r s o n s i c g u l a r ,

o f a v ~ r b il, n e a n i n g ' t o e x i s t * , w h i c h h a s p a s s e d o u t cf u s e

E X C E ~ ~ i~ a few n e g a t i v e f o r m s . , . a l l a i s a n a b b r e v i a t e d

form of t h e n e g a t i v e ~ o o d , t h i r d p e r s o n s i n g u l 3 r , of a n obso le t e

v e r b al, m e a n i n g 'to be f i t , p r c p e r , ' e tc , . f i ( o p o c i t * ,

pp .153-54) . We h a v e n c t e d t h a t t h e c o n j u g a t i o n cf v e r b s i n t h e

n e g a t i v e ~ o o d is n o l o n g e r a f e a t u r e o f t h e l a n g u a g e , What tken

is t h e s y n c h r o r i i c s t a t u s of i l l a a ~ d a l l a , a c d how mus t we

a c c c u r t f o r their d i s t r i b u t i o n ?

Page 31: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

1 . 4 Ic t h e a b s e c c ~ cf c l e a r t h ~ ~ r ~ t i c a i c r i t s r i a , w h ~ t h e r

syntactic o r s e m a n t i c , d e f i t i n g w h a t is ' n e g 8 t i v ~ * , it b e c o a e s

d i f f i c u l t t o g o i n t c s u c h q u e s t i o n s i n a n y d e p t h , We w i l l , i n

C h a p t e r T I , o x a ~ i n e t h e g e n e r a t i v e g r a m a a r i a n s ' a p p r o a c h t o

n e g a t i v i t y , a n d define nes i n K a ~ r - a d a i n t ~ r ~ s e E t h e s y n t a c t i c

a n d s e m a c t i c c o n s e q u e n c e s o f i ts p r e s e n c e i n t h ~ s e n t e n c e , The

s y n t a c t i c c o c s e q u e n c e we w i l l d i s c u s s i s i l l u s t r a t e d h y the

f o l l c w i e g s e n t e n c e s , a n d c o n c e r n s t h e i n t e r a c t i o n o f neg with a

Noun P h r a s e c o n t a i n i n g a n i n d e f i n i t e q u a n t i f i e r , a n d q u a l i f i e d

by -JIJ , a n e m p h a t i c m o r p h e ~ ~ wh ich t r a n s l a t e s a s ' e v e n , t o o * :

74 . n a a n u a v a n u h e e L i d a o n d u m a a t - a n n u k e e l a l (u) -ills, I h e s a i d o n e word a c c , h e a r ( i a f i n i t i v e ) n o t

1 d i d n o t h o a r o n e o f t h ~ w o r d s t h a t b e s p o k e ,

15, n a a n u a v a n u h e e L i d i l o c d u m a a t - a n n (u) -uu k e e l a l (u) -illa. I h e s a i d o n e word acc, eve^ h e a r ( i n f . ) n c t

1 d i d n o t h e a r ever. a ( s i ~ g l e ) v c r d t h a t h e s p o k e .

16 , * n a a n u a v a n u h e e l i d a o n d u m a a t - a n n (u) -uu k e e l i d e , f h e s a i d one word acc. evec h e a r d

*I h e a r d e v e n a s i n g l e u o r d t h a t h e s p o k e ,

T h e p r e s e n c e of a n i c d z f i n i t e q u a n t i f i e r i11 t h e NP q u a l i f i e d by

- u u - is u n g r a m m a t i c a l i f there i s n o n e g a t i v e i n the s e n t e n c e .

T h u s (16 ) a b c v e is g r a i u m a t i c a l i f o n d u ' o n e ' i s i n t e r p r e t e d

a s a d ~ f i n i t ~ a r t i c le , e.g., i n a s i t u a t i o n w h e r e o n l y one

werd w a s s p o k e n , a n d t h a t one vcrd was h e a r d , a s i r . (17) below:

Page 32: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

17. xaanu a v a E u k 2 L i d a ( a c d ~ e ) ondu mad t - a n n (u) - u u kceLide. T he s a i d c ~ e - o r l y o n e word a c e . e v e n t eard

I h e a r d e v e n t h e o c l y word t h a t h e s p o k s ,

Example (15) a b o v e is f r o m S p e n c e r , whc s t a t e s :

" + b e termination uu a d d s ~ m p h a s i s t o t h o worE t o w h i c h i t

is a t t a c h e d , o r t o some word n e a r l y c o c n e c t e d w i t h i t , It is

freyuectly ~ m p l o y e d to g i v e e m p h a s i s t o a n u m e r a l . . .n

( o p . c i t . , p . 5 1 ) , What S p e n c e r d o e s n o t m e n t i o ~ is t h a t t h e

" e m p h a t i c a f f i x uuw a n d an i n d e f i n i t e q u a n t i f i e r fc a n NP

c a a n o t c c - o c c u r u n l e s s t h e r e is a n e g a t i v e i n t h e s e n t e n c e .

we w i l l t h e r e f o r e make use o f s u c h e x a m p l e s t o p r c p o s e a

t e s t f a r n e q i n Kancada . By this t ~ s t , w h i l e i l l a . a l l a , t h e ' n e g a t i v e v e r b a l p a r t i c i p l e t e n d i n g i n - a d e e , acd the * ~ e g a t i v e m o d a l s * q u a l i f y a s n s , t h e ' n f g a t i v ~ p a r t i c i p l e i

3r.d t h e 'negative worda 1-ads acd afn)-f do n o t , He w i l l

t h e n p r o p c s e t h e rules for t h e g e n e r a t i o n of nes i n Kannada ,

and f o r its seaant i c i n t e r p r e t a t i o n ,

Page 33: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

hrc t e s

1. For t h e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n of s o u r c e s a n d f u r t h e r d i s c u s s i o n , see K f ima (1964:250) ,

2. F o r a d e t a i l e d d i s c u s s i o n , s ~ t i J a c k e n d o f f (7972: 336-52) . 3 , T h e c i t a t i o n o f f o r m s w i t h i l l a i n t h e compound t e n s e s

hero i s r o t c o m p l e t e ; a f u l l t a b l e a p p e a r s i r C h a p t e r IV, pp.90-91.

4 . P e da n o t r u l e o u t t h e p o s s i b i l i t y t h a t some d i a l e c t s o f ~ r a v i d i a n l a n g u a g e s dc i n f a c t a i s p l a y a n e x t r e m e l y * s k e w e d 9 s y s t e m : e , g. , t h e d i a l e c t o f non-Brahmin T a m i l that S c h i f f r n a n c o n s i d e r s . (The f a c t s a r e d i f f e r e n t f o r my d i a l e c t of T a m i l , ) We a r e o n l y n a k i n g a p l e a a g a i n s t t h e i n v a l i d e x t r a p c l a t i o n of a n a l y s e s a c r o s s d i a l e c t s .

5 , Cf. K e s i r a j a g s Shabda rnan ida rpana tn , s u t r a 316:

so l loL k r i p a a t m a k a a v y a y a v i l l a v e m b u d u . . .

' i l l a is a v e r b - l i k e i n d e c l i n a b l e i n t h e s e n t e n c e . . , *

c f . a l s o B a s t i V e n k a t ~ s a I y ~ r g a r , Nama Nudi ( 1 9 6 0 3 7 6 ) :

" l i n g s v a c h a n a v i b h a k t i p r a t y a y a g a l a n ~ u paDoyada s h a b d a g a L a n n u vyaaka raWa a v y a y a g a L e n d u k a r e y u t t a d e . i v u g a ~ a l l i h a l a v u r i i t i ivs, a l l a i l l a m u c t a a d a v u k r i y a y a o t e v a r t i s u t t a v e .

' T h o s e w o r d s wh ich d o n o t t a k e g e n d e r , number a n d casi? a f f i x e s a r e c a l l e d i c d e c f i n a b l e s b y t h o grammar . T h e r e a r e d i f f e r e n t . k i n d s of i n d e c l i n a b f e s . Alla, i l l a etc. b e h a v e a s v e r b s , '

6 , A l t h o u g h maaDadz k e l a s a t r a n s l a t e s a s * t h e u c r k wh ich was n o t d o n e t a n d m a a D a d ( a 1 a v a n u a s ' h e who d i d n o t d o th? w o r k * , t h i s is t c b e a t t r i b u t e d t o t h e a m b i g u i t y of t h i s c c n s t r u c t i o n i n Kannada , c o u p l e d w i t h s e l e c t l o n a l r e s t r i c t i o n s , r a t h e r t h a n t c t h e i r b e i n g d i f f e r e n t c o ~ s t r u c t i o n s . T h u s w h i l e

o o d u e a p u s t a k a ' r e a d i n g b o o k t

i s u a d e r s t o c d a s l a bcok t o be r e a d g ( # * a book wh ich r e a d s ' ) ,

Page 34: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

o c d u v a huDugi *rzadicg girl *

is understood a s I t h e girl who reads8 ( # ' a girl t o b e r e a d 1 ) .

7 . The conjugation is a s f o l f o u s :

verb

sg

1st pers, maaDFnu

2nd pers, maaD~

3 r d pers. masc. ~aaDanu

fe P. ~aaDaLu

naut. raaaDadu

I do~'t d c , maaDevu etc.

ataaDari

Page 35: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

C B A P T E E I I

N E G I N K A N N A D A

2.0 The a t t e m p t t o d e f i n e f o r i r t a l l y , w h e t h e r i t o c c u r s

a s a s y n t a c t i c o r a s e m a n t i c feature whose p r e s e n c e h a s c e r t a i n

c o n s e q u e n c e s f o r t h e s e n t e n c e , stems f r o m a d i f f e r e n t

t h o e r e t i c a l a p ~ r c a c h t c c e g a t i c c thac t h a t o f t r a d i t i o n a l

grammar . He h a v e s e e n t h a t g r a m m a r i a n s h a v e s o f a r p r o v i d e d

lists o f ' n e g a t i v e s ' , q u o t i n g e a c h ' n e g a t i v e ' f o r m i n t h s

a p p r o p r i a t e p a r a d i g m ( a s a ' p a r t i c i p l e * , or a ' p a r t i c i p i a l

count, a n d s o o n ) w i t h o u t a t t e m p t i n g t o d e f i n e ' c e g a t i v e * .

We w i l l see when we d i s c u s s t h e t r e a t m e n t o f alla a n d i U b y

S p e n c e r (1914) a n d Gowda ( f 97O) , t h a t t h o s s who do a t t e m p t a

d e f i n i t i o n o f n f ~ mere1 y p r o v i d e p a r a p h r a s e s of t h e ' n ~ g a t i v ~ '

w c r d s , o r of t h e i r s e m a n t i c r o l e ( e - g . , i l l 3 is s a i d t o n e g a t e

e x l s t e r . c e , a n d alla, e q u i v a l e n c e ) a n d t h a t t h i s a p p r o a c h

l e a d s t o i n c o n s i s t e n c i e s .

G e n e r a t i v e g r a m ~ a r i a n s h a v e worked w i t h t h e n o t i o n o f

a s a g r a m m a t i c a l f e a t u r e ( ~ l i m a , 1964) o r a s a m o d a l

o p e r a t o r ( J a c k e n d o f f , 1 9 7 2 ) . F o r K l i m a , sea is a g r a m ~ a t i c 3 l

f e a t u r e , t h e p r e s e n c e o f w h i c h h a s c e r t a i n s y n t a c t i c

c c n s e q u e n c e s f o r t h e s e n t e n c e . A s i d e f rcm t h e s e s y n t a c t i c

c o n s G q u e n c e s , t h e r e is no way c f k n o w i n g , i n h i s f r a m e w o r k ,

Page 36: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

1 i f a s c c t e c c e is n s g a t i v e . Thg s y z t a c t i c c c n s e q u m c e s of t h e

p r e s e n c e o f r&a that K l i m a n o t e s f o r E n g l i s h , a n d w h i c h t h u s

f u n c t i c r . a s t e s t s f o r n s , a r e t h e o c c u r r e f c e o f ( 2 ) t h e

e i t h e r - c l a u s e , ( i i ) t h e n e g a t i v e a p p o s i t i v e t a g , a n d ( i i i ) t h e

q n e s t i on t a g wi t h o n t not. IF a d d i t i o n , x i e i t h e r - c o n j o i a i n q

p r o v i d e s a test f o r ' s t r c c g * s e c t o n c e n e g a t i o n . We w i l l b r i e f l y

e l a b o r a t e o n e a c h of t h e s e t e s t s 8 a s f o r i n u l a t e d by Klima.

w E i t h e r - c o n j o i n i n g . . . o c c u r s o n l y when the

s e n t e n c ~ t o b e a p p e n d e d i f i and . . . e i t h e r c o n t a i n s

a o r one o f t h e n e g a t i v e p r e - v e r b a l a d v e r b s . . . :: p. g., ( q u o t a t i o n s a n d e x a ~ t p l e s frcm Kliaa , o p . c i t . ,pp.261-65) ,

183. P u b l i s h e r s w i l l { u s u a l l y ) reject s u g g e s t i o n s , { a l w a y s ) E n o t 1

ar,d writers w i l l f n o t ) a c c e p t t h e m , e i t h e r , { s c a r c e l y ) f h a r d l y ) f n e v e r ) { s e l d o m ) [ r a r e l y 3

18h. * P u b l i s h e r s w i l l { u s u a l l y ) re jec t s u g g e s t i o n s , { a l w a y s ) f ~ 0 - t )

a n d writers w i l l [ u s u a l l y ) a c c e p t t h ~ m , e i t h e r . { a l w a y s )

S e n t e c c e (18b) s h o w s t h a t the p r e s e n c e of e i t h 3 ~ is

i n c o m p a t i b l e w i t h p r e - v e r b a l a d v e r b s wh ich d o n o t h a v e t h e

g r a a m a t i c a l f e a t u r e neq. With s u c h a d v e r b s , too o c c u r s :

Page 37: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

18c. P u b l i s h e r s w i l l ( u s u a l l y ] reject s u y g z s t i o n s , ( a l w a y s 1 { F O ~ 1

a n d writers w i l l f u s u a l l y ) a c c e p t t h e m , t o o .

T h e p r e s e R c e of the ~ s g a t i v e 3 p p o s i t i v e t a g ,

mL ~ z n , d e p e n d s on t h e p r e s e n c e o f i n t h e main s e n t e n c e :

1 9 a . n r i t ~ r s w i l l r o t a c c e p t s u g g e s t i o n s , { n o t e v e n j { * e v e n 3

r e a s o n a b l e o n e s ,

19b . Writers w i l l a c c e p t s u g g e s t i o n s , [ Even 3 ( * n o t e v e n )

r e a s o n a b l e o n e s .

K l i w a ' s t h i r d c r i t e r i o n f o r t h e p r e s e n c e o f is

i l l u s t r a t e d i n (20a -b ) :

20a. Writers will n o t a c c e p t s u g g e s t i o n s ,

( w i l l t h e y 1 { * u o n 8 t t h e y 3 ? ( e x c e p t w i t h i n t o n a t i o n m a r k i n g ( * w i l l t h e y n o t ) l r c r e d u f o u s n e s s o r sarcasm )

T h e q u e s t i o n t a g w i t h o u t & o c c u r s o n l y i f t h e main s e n t e n c e

c o n t a i n s w. T h u s (20b) is u n g r a m n i a t i c a l :

20b , *writers w i l l a c c e p t s u g g e s t i o n s , w i l l t h e y ? ( e x c e p t w i t h i n t o n a t i o n m a r k i n g i n c r e d u l o u s l n e s s o r sarcasm)

Page 38: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

F o r n e i t h s y - c o r i j c i n l r i g t o occur, " t h s b a s e s e n t e n c e ,

r a t h e r t h a c j u s t t h e a p p e n d e d s e c t e n c e a s i n e i t h e y -

c o c j o f ~ i n g , mus t c o r t a i c a n e g a t i v e p r e - v e r b n :

21a . Writers w o n s t h e a c c e p t l c g s u g g e s t i o n s , a n d n e i t h e r w i l l p u b l i s h e r s .

27b. *Writers w i l l be a c c e p t i n g s u g g e s t i o n s , a n d n e i t h e r w i l l p u b l i s h e r s ,

We are n o t c o n c e r n e d h e r e with t h e a c c e p t a b i l i t y of

K f i @ a t s a c a l y s i s w i t h i f i t h e E x t e n d e d L e x i c a l A y p o t h e s i s .

W G m e r ~ l y q u o t e him t o d e m o n s t r a t e t h a t t h i s a p p r o a c h t o

n e g a t i o n d i f f e r s f r o m t h e t r a d i t i o n a l o n e , a n d u i ight be

w o r t h a d o p t i n g f o r a p r e l i m i n a r y a n a l y s i s o f n e g a t i o n

i n Kannada, T h u s R l i m a S s t e s t s for the p r e s e n c e ef neg

show u p a g r a m m a t i c a l d i f f e r e n c e b e t w e e n a a n d t h e n e g a t i v e

p r e - v e r b a l a d v e r b s en t h e one hand , a n d t h e a d v e r b s w i t h

s o - c a l l e d ' c o g a t i v e * p r e f i x e s , s u c h a s u n f o r t u n a t e l y ,

u n i n t e n t i o n a l l y , etc., en t h e o t h e r , F o r , . . t h e

o c c u r r e n c e o f u n i n t e n t i o n a l l y , u c f o r t u n a t e l y o r u n f a i t h f u l

d c e s n o t r e s u l t i n s t r u c t u r e s t h a t a r e i n s t a n c e s o f s e n t e n c e

n e g a t i c n . The f o l l o w i n g , f o r e x a m p l e , a r e n o t g r a m m a t i c a l

s e n t e n c e s :

22, * P u b l i s h e r s w i l l u n i n t e n t i o n a l l y r e j ec t s u g g e s t i o n s , a n d writers w i l l u n i n t e n t i o n a l l y re jec t them, e i t he r ,

23, *writers a r e u n r e c e p t i v e t o s u g g z s t i o n s , n o t e v e n good o n e s .

Page 39: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

A n d a s a s i m ~ l f t a g - q u e s t i o ~ , without i n c r e d u i o u s o r

s a r c a s t i c o v e r t o n e , t h e f o l l o w i n a d o ~ s n o t occur:

24, *Writers u n f o r t u n a t e l y reject s u g g e s t i o n s , d o t h e y ? " ( o p . c i t . ,pp.270-71)

2.1 J a c k e n d o f f ' s d ~ f i n i t i c n o f s e n t e n c e p e g a t i o n (1972)

i s c o n s t r u c t e d w i t h i n t h e c o n t e x t o f a s e m a n t i c t h e o r y . H e

p r o p o s e s t h e f o l l o w i n g a s a " r o u g h i n t u i t i v e t o s t for s e n t e n c e

n e g a t i o n N ( o p . c i t . , p , 3 2 1 ) :

A s e n t e n c e f' X -- n e g -- Y 'J is a n i n s t a n c e o f s ~ n t ~ n c e S

n e g a t i o n i f t h e r e e x i s t s a p a r a p h r a s e { d i s r e g a r d i n g

p r e s u p p o s i t i o n s ) It is n o t s o t h a t [ X -- Y 1, S

~ c c o r d i n g t o a l a t e r s t a t e a e n t (cp.cit, , p. 352) ,

I n t u i t i v e l y , a s e n t e n c e is ar, i n s t a n c e o f s e n t e n c e

n e g a t i o n i f e v e r y t h i n g t h a t i t is p o s s i b l e t o d e n y is

i n fac t d e n i e d . "

It is i a p o r t a n t t o n c t e t h a t J a c k & n d o f f s s d e f i n i t i o n o f

s e n t e n c e n e g a t i o n is n o t c o - e x t e c s i v e w i t h K l i a a ' s . T h u s t h e

s e n t e n c e

Page 40: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

2 5 a . Y a x w s l l d i d pot kill th2 j u d q z w i t 2 a s i l v z r haminx; n e i t h e r d i d h + d o s o w i t h a b r a s s acz; h s k i l l e d h i m w i t h 3 w o o d e n hammer.

is n o t a n i n s t a n c e of s e n t l n c e n a g a t i o n f o r J a c k e n d o f f , b e i n g

a n i n s t a n c e o f f o c u s s a d n e g a t i o n , b u t i t is a n i n s t a n c e o f

s t r ~ n g s c n t ? n c e n e g a t i o n f o r Klima, a s e v i d e n c z d b y t h e

3f t h e

J a k e n d o f f ' s d e f i n i t i o n o f s e n t s n c 3 n e g a t i o n is t o b s

i n t s r p r s t s d w i t h i n h i s t h s o r y of m o d a l s t r u c t u r e : is a

m o d a l D p 2 r a t c r w h i c h i m p o s e s c o n d i t i o n s o n t h z i d e n t i f i a b i l i t y

o f r e f e r e n t s arid t h - r 5 a l i s a b i i i t y o f evec ts . F o r a s s n t - n c t

S 1 t o b~ sent9nce n e g a t i o n , i t m u s t p a r a p h r a s e IL i s n o t s o

t h a t S 2 ; i t s m o d a l s t r u c t u r e m u s t c o n t a i n a n e g a t i o c o n

w h i c h a l l i n d e t e r m i n a t ~ s i n S1, a n d S 1 itself, a re d e p e ~ d e n t .

S + n t e n c + n e g a t i o n i n J a c k e n d o f f I s terms c o n t r a s t s r i t h

f o c u s s e d ~ e g a t i c n : " O f t e n n e g a t i o n d o z s n o t seem t o a p p l y

t o a n e n t i r e s s a t e n c e , b u t o n l y t o p a r t o f i trt ( o p . c i t . , p . 2 5 ' 1 ) .

T h u s t h e s e n t 2 n c e

2 5 b . M a x w e l l d i d n o t k i l l t h e j u d g e w i t h a s i f v c r hamm2r.

is a m b i g u o u s b e t w e e n s e n t 5 n c e n e g a t i o n and f o c u s s z d n e g a t i o n

( f o r instants, o n t h s i n s t r u m e n t ) , ' s p o s s i b i y d i f f e r a n t i a t e d

by d e g r e e o f e m p h a s i s o n h a m m e r f ( J a c k e n d o f f , o p . c i t . , p. 254 ) .

Page 41: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

T h 3 t is, ~ C E s ~ c t e ~ c e may bs p a r a p t r a s e d e i t h s r b y

(a) 1 t ' s n o t the case that R a x w e l l killed t h e judge w i t h a si l v z r h a m a e r Isex t e n c e n e g a t i o n )

(h) T+ w a s fiot w i t h a s i l v e r hammer t h a t M a x w e l l k i l l e d t h e j u d g e ( f o c u s s e d ~ ~ g a t i c n )

Ir. ( b ) , we are cot d e n y i n g t h a t & a x w e l l k i l l e d t h e j u d g e , b u t

what h e k i l l e d t h e j u d g e with, T b u s " e v e r y t h i n g t h a t

i t i s p o s s i b l e t o d e n y m is i n f a c t n o t d e n i e d , ar,d fb) is n o t

ac i c s t a n c e o f s e n t e n c ~ n e g a t i o n ,

T h e n o t i o n o f f o c u s s e d c e g a t i o n w i l l prove u s e f u l

i~ d e a l i n g with o u r t o p i c . Hence , a s i n d i c a t e d i n f o o t n o t e { I ) ,

we w i l l u s e t h e terms ' s e n t e n c e c e g a t i o n y a n d ' f o c u s s e d

c e g a t i c c * i n t h e s e n s e i n w h i c h Jackendoff u s e s them.

2.2 However , i n view o f t h e v a r i e t y o f * n e g a t i v e 9

~ x p r e s s l o n s i n Kannada , a t e s t f o r nea o n t h e l i n e s of

Klirnaqs a n a l y s i s may serve t o d e l i m i t the f i e l d o f

i ~ q u i r y . We h a v e b r i e f l y m e n t i o c ~ d i~ C h a p t e r I , t h e

p o s s i b i l i t y of u s i n g a n NP w h i c h c o n t a i c s a n i n d e f i n i t e

q u a n t i f i ~ r a s s u c h a t e s t , by e x a m i n i n g w h e t h e r or n o t i ts

q u a l i f i c a t i o n with a n -uu morpheme ( a n raph ha tic w h i c h o f t e n

t r a p s l a t e s a s ' e v e n , t o o ' ) l e a d s t o u n g r a m m a t i c a l i t y .

Page 42: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

K E c i t e d t h s r e t h e s e n t e r c e s :

15, c a a n u a v a n u h e e L i d a ocdu maat-anrr (u) -uu k e e l a l (u) - I l l a . I h e s a i d o n e wcrd a c c . e v e n h e a r ( i n f . ) n o t

I d i d n o t h e a r e v e n a s i n g l e word t h a t he s p o k e .

16. * r a a ~ u a v a n u h e ~ L i d a ondu maat-anc ( u ) -uu k e e l i d e . I h e s a i d o n e word acc, e v e n k e a r d

*I h ~ a r d e v e c a s i c g l e word t h a t h e s p o k e .

We r o t e d t h a t t h e p r e s e n c e o f a * n e g a t i v e s i n ( 1 5 ) r e n d e r s i t

g r a m m a t i c a l , a s a g a i n s t ( 1 6 ) .

Be see f r o m (15) a b c v e t h a t t h e p r e s e n c e o f -uu,

ac i n d e f i n i t e q u a n t i f i e r , a c d a c e g a t i v e b r i n g s a b o u t a n

i n t e r e s t i n g s e m a n t i c c h a n g e a s well: t h e q u a ~ t i f i e r is now

i c c l u d e d w i t h i n t h e s c c p e o f n e g a t i o n . The s e m a c t i c s o f s u c h

s t r u c t u r e s i s c o n p a r a b l e , i n E n g l l s h , t o the e f f e c t o f

M e g - i n c o r p o r a t i o n i c t o i n d e f i n i t e s ( c f , K l i m a , o p . c i t , ) o r

t o t h e wel l -known i n t e r a c t i o n b e t w e e n q u a n t i f i e r s a n d wr

when is t o t h e l e f t of t h e q u a n t i f i e r i n s u r f a c e s t r u c t u r e

and t h e r e f o r e i n c l u d e s t h e q u a n t i f i e r w i t h i n i ts s c o p e

(cf. J a c k e n d o f f , o p . c i t . ) . This is the d i f f e r e n c ~ be tween

26a . Not many a r r o w s h i t t h e t a r g e t

and

26b, Many a r r o w s d i d c i t h i t t ke t a r g e t .

Page 43: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

Iri ( 2 6 a ) , t h e q u a n t i f i e r is i n c l u d e d i n t h e s c o p e c?f t h e

n e g a t i o n , w h e r e a s i n (26h), i t is n o t , T h u s ( 2 7 a ) ,

b u t n c t (27b) , is a c o n t r a d i c t i o r :

2 7 a . No t many a r r o w s hit the t a r g e t , b u t many d i d .

27b. Many a r r o w s d i d n ' t hit t h e t a r g e t , b u t many d i d ,

The i n t e r a c t i o n o f q u a n t i f i e r s acd n e g a t i o n , a n d t h e

q u e s t i o n a s t o w h e t h e r t h i s i r t e r a c t i o n is t o b e c a p t u r e d

t r a n s f o r m a t i o n a l l y ( a s i n Klimaqs a n a l y s i s ) or b y a n

i n t e r p r e t i v e s e m a n t i c r u l e ( a s i r , J a c k e n d o f f ' s a n a l y s i s ) is a

s e p a r a t e i s s u e . T h e i n t e r e s t i n g f a c t s f o r u s a r e (i) t h e

n o n - o c c u r r e ~ c e a • ’ -m f o l l o w i n g i n d e f i n i t e l y q u a ~ t i f i e d WP's

i r , n o n - c ~ g a t i v c s e c t e n c e s a n d ( i i ) t h e c h a n g e i n t h e s e m a n t i c

i n t e r p r e t a t i o n of n e g a t i o n when -m is p r e s e n t . B e may c i t e

these two f a c t s a s a tes t f o r r i e g a t i o n i n K a n n a d a , wh ich u e

2 will c a l l t h e -u t e s t , f o r c o n v e r i e c c e ,

We h a v e seen i r , (15-16) a b o v e t h e i n t e r a c t i o n o f

a r d t h e i n d e f i n i t e q u a n t i f i e r o n d u 'ai. C c n s i d e r n o u

s o c t e c c e s (28a-d) . The s u b j e c t WP i n t h e s e s ~ n t e c c e s i s

a n i n d e f i n i t e l y q u a n t i f i e d p r o n o u n w h i c h h a p p e n s t o be a

l e x i c a l itea: o b b a n u '0r.e-mac* o r ' a ( s i n g l e ) rnao'. I n

Page 44: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

sec te rLces ( 2 8 c - d ) , this NP i s follou~d b y -m ; a n d

s e n t e n c e s ( 2 8 b - c ) c o n t a i f , i l l a :

2 8 a . o b b a n u b a n d a n u , ane-man came

P, mar! came.

28b. o b b a n u b a r 2 1 (u ) - i l l a s cno-man come (icf ,) riot

A man d i d co t come,

2 8 c . o b b a n ( u ) - u u b a r a l ( u ) - i l l a . one-man e v e n c o ~ e ( i n f .) n o t

Not a s i n g l e Ban came.

28d. * o b b a n (u ) - u u b a n d a n u , one-man e v e n came

*Even a ( s i n g l e ) mar came.

S e n t e n c e ( 2 8 c ) i l l u s t r a t e s t h e case where t h c q u a c t i f i e r

i s i n t s r p r e t o d a s b e i n g w i t h i n t h e s c o p e of t h e n e g a t i o c ,

a n d ( 2 8 d ) , c o n t a i n i n g -uu a n d a n i c d e f i n i t e q u a n t i f i e r b u t

n o n e g a t i v e e l e m e n t , is u n g r a m m a t i c a l , a s p r e d i c t e d .

S e n t e n c e s (29a -d ) below i l l u s t r a t e the i n t e r a c t i o n o f -- A a n d w i t h the i n d e f i n i t e p roRoun y a a r - o o , ' s o m e o n e ,

29a . a v a n u yaa r - i g -00 haNa-va fnu koTTanu. h e who d a t . o n e money acc. g a v e ,

H e g a v e someone the money.

29b . a v a n u y a a r -ig -00 haNa-vannu k o D a l ( u ) - i l l a . h e whc d a t , o n e money acc, g i v e ( i n f . ) n o t

H E d i d n o t u i v e someone the money.

Page 45: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

2 9 c . a v a c u yaar - I g - u u h a W a - v a n c u k o D a l [ u ) -ills. h e who d a t e e v e n mcEey a c c . g i v e ( i r _ f . ) n c t

He d i d n o t g i v e a n y o n e t h e money.

29d. + a v a n u y a a r - i g -uu ha t l a -vannu koTTanu. h e who d a t . e v e n raoney a c c . g a v e

*He g a v e a c y o n e the money.

2 . 3 Y e h a v e t h u s e x a m i c e d t h e i n t e r a c t i o n of i l l a w i t h

-m a n d t h e i n d e f i n i t e s o n d u ' o n e s , obba lone -mans a n d

y a a r - c c ' someone ' . I n e v e r y c a s e , t h e p r s s e n c e of i l l a h a s l e d

t o g r a m m a t i c a l i t y , a n d a n i n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f n e g a t i o n w i t h t h o

q u a ~ t i f i e r i n c l u d e d w i t h i n i t s scope. T ~ P a b s e n c e o f i l l a

h a s l e d t o u n g r a m m a t i c a l i t y , t h u s s h o w i n g t h a t ills c a r r i e s the

f e a t u r e c_eq, by o u r d e f i ~ i t i o n .

I f we now e x a m i c e t h e b e h a v i o u r of &la, we f i n d

t h a t i t y i e l d s s i m i l a r p a r a d i g m s w i t h o n d u * o n e 8 ( 3 0 a - d ) , obba

' one -wan* (31a -d ) a n d y a a r - o o ' s o m e o n e * ( 3 2 a - d ) :

30a . i d a r a l l i o n d u k a a g a d a v u n a ~ m a d u . i n t h i s o n e l e t t e r o u r s

One l e t te r among these is o u r s .

30b. i d a r a l l i o n d u k a a g a d a v u cammadu a l l a . i n t h i s o n e l e t t e r o u r s n o t

One l e t t e r among t h e s e is n o t o u r s .

Page 46: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

30c. i d a r a l l i ondu k a a g a d a v (u) - uu naminadu a l l a . i n this c n e l e t t e r e v e n c u r s not

Not e v e n o n e l e t t e r among t h e s e is o u r s .

30d . * i d a r a l l i ondu k a a g a d a v (u) - uu nammadu. i n t h i s o n e f e t t e r e v e n o u r s

*Ever a s i n g l e l ~ t t e r zmccg t h e s e is c u r s ,

3 1 a , o b b a n u cLLeyavanu. one-man good man

One man is good ,

3 1 b. o b b a c u oLLeyavanu a l l a . one- an good man n o t

One map is n o t good.

31c. c b b a o ( u ) - uu o l l e y a v a ~ u a l l a , one-man e v e n good man n o t

Mot e v e n o n e mac i s good / Not a s i n g l e mar is good.

31d. * o b b a n ( n ) - u u oLLeyavacu. one-man e v e E g c o d man

*Even a s i n g l e man is qood.

328. y a a r - o o oLLeyavaru . who o n e good p e o p l e

S o a e c n e is good,

32b. y a a r - o c c L L e y a v a r u a l l a . who o n e good p e o p l e n o t

Soaeoae is n o t good ,

32c. y a a r - u u o L L e y a v a r u a f l a . who e v e n good p e o p l e n o t

No o n e is qood,

Page 47: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

3 2 d . * y a a r - u u o L L e y a v a r u . who e v e n g o o d p e c p l e

*Even s o m e o n e is good.

We t h e r e f o r e d e f i n e a l l a a s FLP,~,

R t h i r d form, v a r i o u s l y c a l l e d a ' n e g a t i v e v e r b a l

p a r t i c i p l e * o r a ' b o u n d n e g a t i v e * , a l s o q u a l i f i ~ s a s neg ;

cf. the sentences ( 3 3 a - d ) , (34a-d) a n d (35a -d ) :

33a . a v a n u o n d u oLLeya k a a r y a ( v a n n u ) maaDi s a t t u h o o d a n u . he one good d e e d (acc.) h a v i n g d o n e d i e d

H E d i e d a f t e r d o i c g a g o o d d e e d .

33b. a v a n u o n d u o L L f y a k a a r y a ( v a n n u ) m a a D - a d ~ e s a t t u h o o d a c u , h e o n e good deed (acc.) d o i n g w i t h o u t d i e d

H e d i e d w i t h o u t d c i c g a good d e ~ d .

3 3 c , avar iu o c d u oLLeya k a a r y a ( v a n n ( u f ) - u u maaD-ades s a t t u h o o d a n u ,

h e o n e good d e e d (acc.) e v e n d o i n g w i t h o u t d i e d

He d i e d w i t h c u t d o i n g evez a s i n g l e g o o d d e e d .

3 3 d . * a v a c u o n d u oLLeya k a a r y a (vann ( u ) ) - u u maaDi 4 s a t t u h o o d a n u , h e o n e g c c d d e e d (acc,) e v e n h a v i n g dote d i e d

* H e d i e d , h a v i n g d o n e e v e n a s i c g l e g o o d d e e d .

3 4 a , a v a n u o b b a - (a) nnu n o o D i bandanu . h e one-man acc. h a v i n g s e e n came

He met someone a a d came.

34b . z v a n u o b b a - (a) r,nu ROOD-adee b a n d a n u . h e one- an acc. s e e i n g w i t h o u t came

H e came w i t h o u t m e 3 t i n g s o a e o n e .

Page 48: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

34c . a v a n u o b b a - (a) r,n ( u ) - u u G O O D - a a s ~ b a n d a n u . h e one-man a c c . e v e n s e e i ~ g w i t h o u t came.

He came w i t h o u t m f e t i n g e v e n a s i n g l e mar.

346. *avar ,u o b b a - ( a ) n c ( u ) - u u n o o D i b a n d a n u . h e one-man acc. e v e n h a v i n g s e e n can't@

*He met e v e n a single war a n d came.

35a. a v a n u y a a r - i f f - o c h a # a - v a n n u koTl'u b a n d a n u . h e who d a t . o n e money a c c . h a v i n g g i v e n came.

H e g a v e someonf t h e money and came.

35b. a v a n u y a a r - i g - o o h a l a - v a n n u koD-adee b a n d a n u . h e who d a t . o n e money acc. g i v i n g w i t h o u t came

R e came w i t h o u t g i v i n g s o m e o n e t h e money,

3 5 c . avanu y a a r - i g - u u haNa-vannu koD-adee b a n d a n u . h e who d a t . e v e o raoney acc. g i v i n g u i t h o u t came

H e c a m e w i t h o u t g i v i n g a n y o c e t h e money.

35d . * a v a n u y a a r - i g - u u haNa-vannu koTTu b a n d a n u . h e who d a t . e v e n money acc. h a v i n g g i v e n came

* H e gave a n y o n e t h e mopey a n d came.

T h e ' n e g a t i v e m o d a l s l b a a r a d u ' m u s t / s h o u l d n o t 1 ,

kuuDadu ' m u s t / s h o u l d n o t 1 a n d beeDa 'do n o t 1 , a l s o u n d e r g o

t h e -- test s u c c e s s f u l l y . T h u s we h a v e t h o s e n t e n c e s

(36a-c) a n d ( 3 7 a - c ) b e l o w , where MP1s c o n t a i n i n g t h e

indef ir . i te q u a n t i f i e r s ' o n e a n d y a a v a w h i c h ( e v e r ) I ,

a r e q u a l i f i e d by -=, ' e v e n , t o o * :

Page 49: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

36a. ~ i i n u o c d u k e l a s a - v a r t r i ( u ) - u u saaDa- b a a r a d u . you o n e work a c c . Even d o m u s t / s h o u l d n o t

Y O U m u s t n o t dc even a s i c g l e j o b ,

36b . n i i n u o n d u k e l a s a - v a n a ( u ) -uu maaDa- kuuDadu, you o n e work acc, e v e n do m u s t / s h o u l d n o t

You m u s t n c t dc ovec a single j o 5 .

3 6 c . n i i n u o n d u k e l a s a - v a n n (u ) -uu maaDa- beeDa. you o n e work acc. e v e n do d o nct

Do not do e v e n a s i n g l e job.

3 7 a , n i i n u y a a v a k e l a s a - v a n n ( u ) -uu maaDa- b a a r a d u , you which work acc, e v e c d o ~ ~ u s t / s h o u l d n o t

You must not d o a n y u o r k .

37b . r ? i i n u y a a v a k e l a s a - s a n n (u) -uu maaDa- kuuDadu. you w h i c h work acc, e v e n d o m u s t / s h o u l d n o t

You a u s t n o t do a n y work.

37c, n i i n u y a a v a k e l a s a - v a n n (u) -uu saaaDa- beelfa. you w h i c h u o r k a c c . even d o d o n o t

Do n o t d o a r y wcrk.

i4e therefore d e f i n e these n e g a t i v e m o d a l s b a a r a d u , kuuDadu ,

ar,d keDa a s

Page 50: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

2 . 4 Ey t h i s -3 test, h o u e v s r , t h ~ w o r d - n e g a t i v e p r a f i x

ihLTt) - a n d t h ~ l b o u n d a n e g a t i v e a&- (occurring i n ' n e g a t i v e

relative p a r t i c i p l e s g ) d o n c t q u a l i f y a s nfo. S e n t e n c e s

(38a -d ) i l l u s t r a t e t h e p a r a d i g m of t h e n e g a t i v e p r e f i x w i t h

t h o indefinite q u a n t i f i e r o n d u

383. a v a r u h r e L i d a c c d u t i i r p u n y a a y a . h e s a i d o n e j u d g e m e n t j u s t

One o f t h e j u d g e m e n t s t h a t h e g a v e i s j u s t .

3 8 b , a v a n u h e e L i d a o n d u t i i r p u a n - n y a a y a . he said o n e j u d g e m e n t u n j u s t

One o f t h e j u d g e m e n t s t h a t h e g a v e is u n j u s t .

38c . * a v a n u h ieeLida o n d u t i i r p ( u ) -uu a n - n y a a y a . he s a i d o n e j u d g e m e n t e v e n u r * j u s t

*Even o n & o f the j u d g e m e n t s t h a t h e g a v e is u n j u s t ,

38d . * a v a n u h e e L i d a o n d u t i i r p (u) -uu n y a a y a . h e s a i d o n e j u d g e m e n t e v e n j u s t .

*Even o n e cf the j u d g e m e r t s t h a t he g a v e i s just.

S e n t e n c e ( 38c ) shows t h a t -uu c a n n c t q u a l i f y afi i n d e f i n i t e l y

q u a n t i f i e d NP e v e n i f t h e r e i s a ' n e g a t i v e a p r e f i x - Ir+ t h e s e n t e n c e . T h e condition f o r - - t o o c c u r i n s u c h

a E e n v i r o n m e n t i s the p r e s e n c e of a l l a :

39, avanu h e e L i d a o c d u t i i r p (u ) -uu n y a a y a a l l a . he said one j u d g e m e n t e v e n j u s t n o t

Not e v e n o n e of t h e j u d g e m e n t s t h a t h e g a v e is j u s t .

Page 51: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

If r;s c c c t r a s t ( 3 8 c ) with ( 3 9 ) , we f i n d t h a t t h e crucial

d i f f e r e n c e is b e t w e e n t h ~ presence o f - i n the former znd

a l l a i n t h e l a t t e r ( c o m p a r e u- and not i n t h e E c g l i s h g l o s s f s

of t h e s e s e n t e n c e s ) . Expressed ir! o u r f o r m a l i s m , t h i s is t h e

d i f f e r e n c e between t h e presence cf the samactic m a r k e r iz

a l l a , a n d its a b s e n c e i n a m - . S i m i l a r p a r a d i g m s o b t a i n

with t h e qua~tifled WPs y a a r - o o * s o m e o n e * a n d o b b a 'one-man'.

T h e c r u c i a l example s a r e s e c t e n c ~ s (4Oc) a ~ d f l i l c ) , w h i c h we

would e x p e c t t o be g r a m m a t i c a l i f t h e r e was a neq p r e s e n t i n

t h e s e n t e n c e :

4 0 a , y a a r - o o b r a h ~ a N a r u . who-one B r a h m i n

Someone is a Brahmin .

9 0 b . y a a r - o o a -b rahmaNaru . uho-one on-Brahmin

Y O c , * y a a r - u u a - b r a h n a N a r u . who-even non-Brahmin

*Even someone is a t o n - B r a h m i n .

40d. * y a a r - u u brahmaNaru . who-even B r a h ~ i r i

*Even s o m e o n e is a B r a h m i n ,

Page 52: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

41a . c b b a c u g n y a a n i . one-man k n o w l e d g e a b l e

One man is k n o w l e d g e a b l e .

41 b. o b b a n u a - g n y a a n i , o n e - man n u n - k n o w l e d g e a b l e

O n e man is ignorant.

41c . *obbari ( u ) -uu a - g n y a a n i . one-man e v e n n o c - k n o w l e d g e a b l e

*Eve!? a s i n g l e man is i g n o r a n t .

41d. * o b b a n (u) - u u g n y a a n i . one-man e v e n k n o w l e d g e a b l e

*Even a s i n g l e man is k n o w l e d g e a b l e .

Ve may c o n t r a s t s e n t e n c e s (40c) arid ( 4 1 c ) w i t h ( 4 2 - 4 3 ) .

42. y a a r - u u b rahmaNaru a l l a , whc -even B r a h m i c r,ot

No o n e i s a Brahmin .

43. o h b a n (u ) -uu g n y a a n i a l l a . one-man e v e n k n o w l e d g e a b l e no t

No t e v e n a s i n g l e mac is k n o w l e d g e a b l e .

I n a p p l y i n g the -xu t e s t t o t h e ' n e g a t i v e r e l a t i v e

p a r t i c i p l e s ' , t h e c learest c a s e s a r e t h o s e o c c u r r i n g w i t h t h e

i n d e f i n i t e q u a n t i f i e r y a a v u d - o o ' some ' , since t h e mos t

f a v o u r a b l e i n t e r p r ~ t a t i o n of o c d u 'one' i n s u c h c o n t e x t s i s a s

a d e f i r i t e q u a n t i f i e r . Be w i l l t h e r e f o r e f i r s t e x a m i n e t h e

Page 53: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

c z i s ~ s wFth yaavud-oc- 'some'. Tho n e g a t i v e r e l a t i v e p a r t i c i p l e

is c c n t r a s t e d with t h e corresponding a f f i r m a t i v e p a r t i c i p l e :

44a . a v a n u h e e L i d a y a a v a u t t a r a v - o o s a r i a a g i ide. he s a i d w h i c h a n s w e r - o n e c o r r e c t i s

S c ~ e a c s w e r t h a t h e g a v e is c o r r e c t .

4 4 b, a v a c u h e e l - a i i a y a a v a u t t a r a v - o o s a r i a a g i i d e . h e s a i d - c o t w h i c h a r i swer -one c o r r e c t i s

Sortie a n s w e r t h a t h e d i d n o t g i v e is c o r r e c t .

44c . * a v a n u h e e l - a d a y a a v a u t t a r a v - u u s a r i a a g i i d e . he s a i d - n o t w h i c h a n s w e r e v e n c o r r e c t is

*Even a n y a n s w e r t h a t h e d i d n o t give is correct .

44d. * a v a n u h e e t i d a y a a v a u t t a r a v - u u s a r i a a g i ide. h e s a i d - c o t which a n s w e r e v e n cor rec t i s

*Even a n y a n s w e r t h a t h e g a v e i s c o r r e c t .

W E B;ay c o m p a r e s m t e n c e s ( 4 4 ~ - a ) w i t h s e n t e n c e s (45a-b) ,

w h e r e t h e n e g a t i v e i l l a o c c u r s :

45a. a v a n u h e e l - a d a y a a v a u t t a r a v - u u s a r i a a g i i f l a . h e s a i d - n o t w h i c h a n s w e r e v e n cor rec t n o t

Noce o f t h e a n s w e r s t h a t he d i d n o t g i v e i s c o r r e c t ,

45b . a v a n u h e e t i d a y a a v a u t t a r a v - u u s a r i a a g i i l l a . h e s a i d w h i c h acswer e v e n c o r r e c t not

Noze cf t h e a n s w e r s t h a t h e g a v e i s c o r r e c t .

Page 54: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

Ccmparc s e c t e n c e s w i t h ocdu irterprst~d a s i n d e f i n i t e :

4 6 a . a v a n u t a n d a o n d u s a a m a a n u Cosadu . h e b r o u g h t o n e t h i n g cew

One of t h e t h i n g s t h a t h e b r o u g h t i s new,

46h. a v a c u t a r - a d z o n d u s a a R a a n u h o s a d u . h e b r o u g h t - n o t o n e t h i n g new

t h e t h i n g s t h a t he d i d n c t b r i n g 1s new.

46c. * a v a n u t a r - a d a o c d u saarnaan (u) - u u h o s a d u . h e b r o u g h t - n o t m e t h i n g e v e n neu

*Even one o f t h e t h i c g s t h a t h e d i d n o t b r i n g is new.

46d. s a v a n u t a n d a o n d u s a a m a a n ju) - u u h o s a d u . h e b r o u g h t o n e t h i n g E v e n n e Y

*Even o n e of t h e things t h a t h e b r o u g h t is cew.

W h i l e ( 4 6 c - a ) a r e u n g r a n a m a t i c a l , (47a-b) a r e g r a m m a t i c a l :

4 7 a . a v a n u t a r - a d a c n d u s a a m a a n ( u ) -uu h o s a d u a l l a . h e b r o u g h t - n o t one t h i n g e v e n new n o t

N o t e v e n o n e of t h e t h i n g s t h a t h e d i d n ' t b r i n g is new.

47b. a v a E u t a n d a o n d u s a a m a a n (u ) -uu h o s a d u a l l a , h e b r o u g h t o n e t h i n g e v e n new n o t

Mot e v e n o n e of t h e t h i n g s t h a t h e b r o u g h t is new.

T h e ' n e g a t i v e r e l a t i v e p a r t i c i p l e ' o r the ' b c u n d t n e g a t i v e

-- is t h e r e f o r e n o t a neq w i t h i n o u r f r a m e w o r k .

Page 55: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

2 . 5 Ce h a v e ~ c w d e f h e d a s 'wl a v a r i e t y o f f o r m s i n

Kacnarla: i l k , a l l a , the t r i f u a t i v e verbal p a r t i c i p l e '

~ n d i n g in - 2 d e e , a c d t h e * n e g a t i v ~ m o d a l s * b a a r a d u , kuuDadu

a n d b m . We h a v e e x c l u d e d two o f t h e forms t h a t we q u o t e d i n

C h a p t e r T as heing * i n t u i t i v e l y r e g a t i v e ' : the p r e f i x aLn)-

a r d t h e ' n e g a t i v e r e l a t i v e p a r t i c i p l e ' e n d i a g i n -&a. The

s t a t u s of h o r a t u wifl b~ clarifies when we e n t a r i n t o a f u l l e r

d i s c u s s i o n of the s e m a n t i c s o f n e g a t i o n .

T h e e x i s t e n c e o f a v a r i e t y of f o r m s d e f i n e d a s

is n o t a m a t t e r f o r s u r p r i s e ; - thus i n E n g l i s h , J a c k e n d o f f wou ld

d e f i c e n e i t h e r , no, Eever , s e l d o m , f c w , a n d l i t t l e fantong o t h e r s )

a s nex. T h e i n t e r e s t i n g f a c t f s t h a t a n a n a l y s i s p o s i t i n g Neg-

i n c o r p o r a t i o c , i n t h e manner o f Kl ima ( o p , c i t . ) , would l e a d tc

ai-i e x t e ~ s i v c c o m p l i c a t i ~ n of t h e g r a n a a r . Such +r a ~ a l y s i s

wcu ld d e p e n d c r u c i a l l y on t h ~ a v a i l a b i l i t y o f a f f i r m a t i v s -

n e g a t i v e ' p a i r s ' , s u c h a s e v e r - n e v e r , e i t h e r - n e i t h e r , any-=

i~ E n g l i s h , however d r a s t i c t h e s p e l l i n g c h a n g e s r e s u l t i n g from

I r g - i r . c o r p o r a t . i o r , might be. The o n l y i c s t a n c ~ o f "uncombinad

n e g a t i c n f v ( J a c k e n d o f f , c p ~ c i t . , p . 3 4 3 ) i n E n g l i s h i s w; i n

Kannada, however , a t least t h r e e l e x i c a l items would h a v e t o

be t r e a t e d a s 'uncombined negatives', i .e, , a l l a , i l l a , and one

i n s t a n c e of beeDa:

Page 56: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

48a. a v a n u o L L e y a v a n u . he good wan

H e i s a good aac,

48b. a v a n u oLLeyavanu alla. he gcod man not

F!e is nct a good man,

4 9 a , a v a n u b a - n d - anu. h s cone p a s t 3 r d p.m,sg.

H e came.

4 9 b . a v a n u b a r a l (uf -ill a. h e come (infinitive) n c t

H e d i d n o t come.

50a. I d - a n n a mazDu. t h i s a c c . d o

Do t h i s .

Sob, i d - a n r a maaDa- beeDa. t h i s ace, d o d o no t

Do not dc t h i s .

I n s e n t e n c e s (48-50) t h e r e i s ~c lexical item ir, t h e [a)

s e n t e n c e s to w h i c h t h e r s g a t i v e s i n the (b ) s e n t e n c e s c a n b e

r e l a t e d . For the n e g a t i v e s w h i c h can b e t h u s r e l a t ed , we would

n e e d r u l e s l i k e t h e f o l l o u i n g :

(i) neg + b e e k u ('must') = I b a a r a d u ) ' m u s t n o t a 5 C kuuDadu 3

51a. i d -aona &aaDa - b e e k u , t h i s a c c . d o must

T h i s m u s t be done.

Page 57: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

51b. i d - a n n a maaDa - b a a r a d u ) . kuuDadu)

t h i s acc. d o must n o t

T h i s m u s t I ; O ~ b e donc5.

(ii) n e g + b e e k u ( * w a r t f ) = ueeDa ' d o c s t w a n t ' i i - A ii

52a . c a n a g e i d u b e e k u . t o R E t h i s w a n t

I w a n t this.

52b. n a n a g e i d u beeDa. t o m e t h i s d o n ' t wan t

I d o n ' t w a n t t h i s .

(iii) neg + v e r b a l . p a r t i c i p l e = v e r b r o o t + adee

5 3 a . a v a n u haaD - u t t a b a n d a n u , h e s i n g i n g c a w

H e came s i o g i n g .

53b. a v a n u haaD -i b a n d a ~ u . he s i n g p r e s e n t p a r t i c i p l e came

H a v i ~ g s u n g , h e came/ He s a n g a n d came.

53c. a v a n u haaD - a a e b a n d a n u , h e s i n g n e g . p a r t i c i p l e came

H e came w i t h o u t s i n g i n g ,

R u l e ( 5 ) is forced t o p c s i t two n e g a t i v e l e x i c a l items for a

s i n g l e a f f i r m a t i v e . From r u l e (ii) we n o t e t h a t w h i l e t h e full

v e r b beeDa ' d o n s t w a n t ' is a r e s u l t o f W e g - i n c o r p o r a t i o n i n t o

t h e full v e r b B e e k u ' w a n t ' , t h e modal besDa ' d o r , o t q is a n

Page 58: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

u x ! c c m b l ~ e d c e g a t i v ? , a c d t h ~ modal b e t k u ' m u s t ' y i e l d s

d i f f e r e n t l e x i c a l items t h a n beeDa a f t e r ~ e g - i n c o r p o r a t i o n

( b y rule (i)) . S u c h i r r e g u l a r i t i e s a re t y p i c a l cf t h o l r?x icor .

r a t h e r t h a n o f the t r a n s f o r m a t i o n a l c o m p o n e n t , a n d p i n p o i n t

the lack of g e ~ e r a l i t y I n s u c h s t a t e m e n t s a s "b€eDa i s t k ?

e x a c t o p p o s i t e of beeku, * w a n t q . . . "(Gowda, l 9 7 0 : 2 ) .

E o r e o v e r , we h a v e y e t t o c a p t u r e t h e f a c t that the v a r i o u s

f o r m s i c K a n n a d a show r i g i d p a t t e r n s cf d i s t r i b u t i o n ,

T h u s , w h i l e t h e E n g l i s h not a p p e a r s i n c o p u l a t i v e , t e n s e d ,

a n d L O ] ? - t e n s r d ( i n f i ~ i t i v a l a n d g e r u n d i a l ) s e n t e x e s ,

i n K a n n a d a , a l l a a p p e a r s In c o p u l a t i v e s e n t e n c e s w h i c h are

w i t h o n t a v e r b , i l l a a p p e a r s ic c o p u l a t i v ~ s p n t e r c e s w i t h

t h e v e r b 'to be1 a n d i n t e n s e d s e n t m c e s , and the ' n e g a t i v e

v e r b a l p a r t i c i p l e 8 e n d i n g i n - a d e e a p p t z a r s irL n o n - t e n s e d

s e n t e n c e s . See, for e x a m p l e , s e n t e n c e s (54 -61) b e l o w , where the

(a) s e n t e n c ~ s a r e t h o s e of E n g l i s h , a n d t h e (b) s e n t e n c e s a r e

t h e i r K a n n a d a c o u n t e r p a r t s :

5 4 a . T h i s is b i g .

54b. i d u doDDa- (a) du . t h i s b i g - it

T h i s is b i g .

5 5 a . T h i s is not b i g .

55b . i d u doDDa- ( a ) d u a l l a . ( * i l l a ) t h i s b i g - it riot

T h i s is n o t b i g .

Page 59: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

5 6 a . T h i s is b i g ,

5 56b, i d u doDDa- ( a ) d ( u ) - aaai i d e , t h i s b i g i t - A A G I b e 3 r d p . c e u t . s g ,

5 7 a . T h i s is not b i g ,

57b. i d u doDDa- (a) d ( u ) - a a g i i l l a , ( * a l l a ) . this big -it - A A G I is cot

T h i s i s n o t b i g ,

58a . Be came,

58b, avariu b a - nd - a n u , h e come past 3 r d p.m.sg.

59a . H e d i d cot c o n e .

59h, avariu b a r a l (u ) -ills. ( +ails) h e c o m e ( i r , f i n i t i v e ) n o t

H e d i d n o t come,

6Oa. He t o l d Mary t o come,

bob, a v a n u Hary- gei [ 0; b a r a l u 3 h e e l i d a n u , h e Bary d a t , t o ccm~ told

H e t o l d Bary t o come.

6 l a . H e t o l d n a r y n c t t o come.

b 1 b . a v a n u Hary - gei [ Bi b a r - a d e e i r a l u ] h e e L i d a n u . h e Mary d a t , coine n e g , p a r t , b e ( i n f ,) t o l d

H e t o l d H a r y not t o come ( t o r e m a i n wi thoue, c o m i n g ) .

61c. * a v a n u Mary- ge; [ Pi b a r a - beeDa -1u ] h e e L i d a n u . 1- illa -1u

h e Mary d a t . come n o t i n f , t o 1 d

He told Mary n o t to come,

Page 60: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

T h ~ s e att terns of d i s t r i b u t i o n can be c a p t u r e d by t r e a t i n g

t h e v a r i c u s neq forms as i n d i v i d u a l lexical i t e i ~ s , a n d

g e n e r a t i ~ g t h e m a t v a r i o u s p l a c e s i n the s y n t a x , i n t h e m a n c e r

cf J a c k e n d o f f , W E t h e s f f o r e t ake t o h e a s e m a n t i c m a r k e r

r a t h e r t h a n a s y c t a c t i c f e a t u r e , acd i n t h e f o l l c u l n g

chapters u n d e r t a k e a resolution o f the p a t t e r n s of d i s t r i b u t i o n

of n o q i n Kacnada .

Page 61: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

Notes

K l i m a d e f i n e s s e n t e n c e n e g a t i o n ( a s opposed to word r ~ e g a t i o n ) i n terms of t h e p r e s e n c e of neg i n t h e s e n t e n c e . However , w+ p r e f e r t o r e s e r v e t h e term 8 s e n t e n c e n e g a t i o n * t o c o c t r a s t w i t h * f o c u s s e d n e g a t i o n * , i n t h e s e n s e of J a c k e n d o f f . A s t h e two d e f i n i t i o n s of s e n t e n c e n e g a t i o n [Rl imags , a a d J a c k e n d o f f 's) a r a n o t c c - e x t e n s i v e , we w i l l s p e a k cf t h e ' p r e s e n c e o f ir a s e n t e n c e * , r a t f i e f t h a n c f * s e n t e r c e n e g a t i o n ' , i n r e l a t i o n t o Kliwa, e x c e p t i n d i r e c t q u o t a t i o n .

2. o u r t e s t , t h e n , is s i ~ i l a r t o K l i m a ' s l n o g a t i v o a p p o s i t i v e t a g f t e s t , t h e d i f f e r e n c e beicg t h a t we are u s i n g t h e c h l i g a t o r y c o - o c c u r r e n c e cf - - a n d i c t h e ma in senterce a s a tes t .

3 . T h e E n g l i s h g l o s s e s f o r t h e MPts q u a l i z i e d b y -g i n t h e s e e x a m p l e s a r e i r r e g u l a r , due t o t h e l e x i c a l p e c u l i a r i t i e s o f E n g l i s h .

4. Once a g a i n , i t is c r u c i a l t h a t the q u a n t i f i e r b e i n t e r p r e t e d a s i n d e f i c i t e . T h u s t t e s e n t e n c e is a c c e p t a b l e i n t h e s e n s e ' h e e v e n d i d a g o o d d e e d (i.e. a p a r t i c u l a r g o o d d e e d ) b e f o r e h e d i e d , *

5 . T h e s y n t a x of t h e m a r k e r - a a q i w h i c h h a s a p p e a r e d a f t e r t h e p r e d i c a t e noun h e r e i s p u z z l i n g . T h e marker is n o t e a s i l y t r a n s l a t e d ; we w i l l g l o s s i t a s -AAGI. his s u f f i x h a s b e e r w i d e l y c o n s i d e r e d t o b~ a n a d v e r b i a l i s e r (cf. T a m i l -a, T e l u g u -gas), o n t h e b a s i s o f e x a t a p l e s s u c h as:

a v a n u c h e n n - a a g i h a a D i d a he n i c e ( l y ? ) s a n g

* H e s a n g well

h o w e v e r c h e n n a seens t o be a noun r a t h e r t h a ~ a n a d j e c t i v e . T h a t -aacri i s n o t i n v a r i a b l y {if e v e r ) a n a d v e r b i a l i s e r , may be s e E n f r o a :

i d u c h e c n - a a g i ide t h i s n i c e ? 2- s

' T h i s is nice. ( * n i c e l y )

We h a v e s e e n t h a t - a a q i a p p e a r s a f t e r p r e d i c a t i v e n o u n s whec t h e r e i s a v e r b i n t h e s e n t e n c e , I t Bay a l s o o c c u r

Page 62: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

a f t , ~ r ac I n t e n s i f i e r :

a v a L i g e b a h i l a - v a a g i d u k k h a a a g a l ( u ) -ills t o h e r muck ? s o r r o w h a p p e n (inf, ) n o t ' S h e d i d n o t f e ? l much s o r r o w 1 ,

Tho s u f f i x - a a q i a l s o a p p e a r s a s a COMP, e .g . ,

avaLu b e n g a L o o r i g e hooguvud ( u ) -asgi c i s h c h a y i s i d a l u , s h e B a n g a l o r e d a t , g o i n g ? d e c i d e d ' S h e d e c i d e d t o g o t o B a n g a l o r e s

peeTer j o h n - a r n a o1,Leyavan (u) -aagi t i l i d i d d a a n e , P e t e r J o h n acc, good man ? t h i n k s

' P e t e r t h i n k s J o h n t o b e a good man.'

W E w i l l not enter inta d e t a i l s of the s y n t a x cf - a a q i here. Its r e l e v a n c e for n ~ g a t i o n is t h a t w h e n e v e r i t a p p e a r s i n a c o p u l a t i v s sentence, t h a t s e n t e n c e i s n o t v e r b l e s s , b u t h a s a v e r b 'to b e 1 oo t h e surface; acd t h e n& which a p p e a r s is n e v e r a l l a , b u t i l l a .

Page 63: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

Ch'APTEfi I11

TBP SYNTAX OF ALLA

3.0 B e h a v e n o t e d t h a t t h e n e a a l l a a p p e a r s i n

c o p u l a t i v e s e n t e c c e s which d c n o t h a v e a v e r b o c t h e s u r f a c e .

Gcwda (7970: I ) makes a s i ~ i l a r o b s e r v a t i o c : I 1 a l l a i s u s e a t o

r e g a t r n c w v e r b a l s e n t ~ n c e s . ~ ~ However, a l m o s t immediately

preceding t h i s o b s e r v a t i o n i s t h e s t a t e i n e c t t h a t " a l l 3 n e g a t e s

t h e e q u a t i o n of two t h i n g s a n d i l l a n e g a t e s e x i s t e n c e , Using

t h e ~ a c s k r i t terms o n e may s a y t h a t a l l a is

2 a n d i l l s i s a b h a a v a a r t h a k a . " Gonda t h u s t r i e s t c d e f i n e t h e

s e m a n t - i c r o l e s of a l l a a c d u.

It i s d i f f i c u l t t o accept t h a t " a 1 1 a n e g a t e s the

e q u a t i o n o f two t h i n g s a n a i l f a n e g a t e s e x i s t e n c e . " We h a v e

s e e n f rcm s e ~ t e n c e s (55b) and (57b) i n C h a p t e r I f , t h a t b o t h

a l l a and illa may a p p e a r i n t h o n ~ g a t i v e s o f c o p u l a t i v e

3 s e n t e n c e s , To c i t e more e x a a p l e s ,

4 62a. i d u s u l a b h a . t h i s e a s e

This is e a s y .

6 2 0 , i d u s u l a b h a - v a a g i ide. t h i s e a s e - R A G 1 be 3 r d . p , n e u t e s g .

T h i s i s e a s y ,

Page 64: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

6 3 a . i d u s u l a b h a a i l s . ( *ills) t h i s ease n o t

T h i s i s n o t e a s y .

6 3 b . I d u s u l a b h a - v a a g i i l l a . ( * a l f a ) t h i s ease - A A G I is n o t

T h i s is co t e a s y .

6 4 a . i d u c h i k k a - (a) du. t h i s small i t

T h i s i s s m a l l ,

640, i d u c h i k k a - ( a ) d (u) - a a g I ide, t h i s smal l it - A A G I be 3 r d p . n e u t . s g .

T h i s is small.

6 5 a . i d u c h i k k a - (a) d u a l l a . ( *ills) t h i s small i t n o t

T h i s i s n o t s m a l l .

65b. i d u c h i k k a - ( a ) d ( u ) - a a g i i l l a . * a l l a ) t h i s smal l i t - A A G I i s n o t

T h i s is n o t small .

Pe n o t e d i n f o o t n o t e ( 5 ) , C h a p t e r 11, t h a t a n a f f i r m a t i v e

c o p u l a t i v e s e n t e n c e w h i c h h a s a n - A A G I marker i n t h e p r e d i c a t e

a l w a y s h a s a v e r b i- *to be' p r e s e n t i n t h e s u r f a c e s t r u c t u r e ,

a ~ d t h a t t h e F& a l l a c a n n e v e r a p p e a r i n s u c h a s e n t e n c e .

I n G o u d a ' s t e r n s , s e n t f c c e s ( 6 3 a , b ) a n d ( 6 5 a , b ) a l l n e g a t e

t h e e q u a t i o n of t w o t h i n g s ; y e t a l l a a p p e a r s i n t h e

(a) s e r t e n c e s , a n d U ir- t h e (b) s e n t e n c e s . T h e d i s t r i b u t i o n

o f a 1 l a a n d i l l a t h e r e f o r e c a n n ~ t be z x p l a i c e d w i t h r e f e r e n c e

t o t h e i r s e m a n t i c r o l e ; t h e s y n t a c t i c s t r u c t u r s of t h e

s e r t e n c e h a s t o b e t a k e n i n t o a c c o u n t .

Page 65: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

I n s a y i n g t h a t i l l a n e g a t e s * x i s t e n c e , ~ o w d a i s

taking i n t . 0 c o n s i d ~ r a t i o n t h e 1 i m i t e d r a n g e of d a t a

e x e m p l i f i e d b y ( 6 6 ) below:

66. F l l i a m r t a i l l a . here c ? c t a r is c c t

T h e r e i s n ' t a n y n e c t a r here.

I r ( 6 6 ) , i 1 1 a d e n i e s t h e e x i s t e n c e of aliirta ' n e c t a r * , a t a

p a r t i c u l a r p l a c e . However, i t i s n o t p o s s i b l e t o c l a i m t h a t

i l l a n e g a t e s t h e e x i s t e ~ c e of s c m e t h i n g , e . g . , ' t h e k i l l i n g cf

t h e t i g e r ' , i n (67a-c) :

67a . a v a n u h u l l - a n n u kond (u ) - i l l a . h e t i g e r a c c . k i l l ( p a s t p a r t i c i p l e ) not

HE h a s n o t k i l l e d t h e t i g e r .

67b. a v a n u h u l i - a n n u k o l l a l ( u ) - i l l a . h e t i g e r a c c , k i l l (inf. ) n o t

He d i d n o t k i l l t h e t i g e r .

i57c. a v a n n h u l i - a n n u k c l l u v u d ( u ) -ills. h e tiger a c c , k i f l p a r t i c i p i a l n o t

He w i l l n o t k i l l t h e tiger.

3 . 1 S p e n c e r (191 4: 153) r e c o g c i s e s the i m p o r t a n c e of

t h e p r c b l e m of t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n of i l l a a n d alla, a c d d e v o t e s

a b r i e f s e c t i o n t o i ts d i s c u s s i o n . To u n d e r s t a n d the

d i s t i n c t i o c h e makes be tween i l l a a n d a l i a , i t is n e c e s s a r y

P C c o n s i d e r h i s a n a l y s i s cf t h e m a r k e r -AhGI.

Page 66: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

T h i s marker is homonymous with t h e p a s t p a r t i c i p l e

of t h o v e r b a a a u 'to happen , t r b e c o m e * ; S p s r c ~ r t a k ~ s - A A G I

t o h e i d e n t i c a l t o t h e p a s t p a r t i c i p l e o f t h i s v e r b . I n a

s ~ c t i o r o n t h e ' c o m b i n a t i o n o f a a q u a n d as ( o p . c i t , ,

pp. 150-52) he s t z t o s :

"The v e r b a a u u l i k e a l l o t h e r v e r b s a d d s t h e v a r i o u s f o r m s o f t h e v e r b iru t o its own p a s t p a r t i c i p l e i n o r d e r t o f o r m i ts p e r f e c t tecses . . . a r i s i n g o u t of t h i s is a s e c o n d a n d very coraraon w a n i r g of t h e s e compcund f o r m s , v i z . t h a t i n w h i c h t h e y a r e e q u i v a l e n t t o t h e E n g l i s h v e r b t o be f o l l o w e d by a c o m p l e ~ e n t . ~ *

T h u s i n t h e s e n t e n c e

6 8 , a v a n u manuSRyar, (u) - a a g i i d d - a a c e . h e man - B A G 1 be 3 r d p.m.sg.

He is a man. 5

S p e n c e r t a k e s -aasi i d d - a a n e t o be a u n i t : t h e gcompound v e r b a

a a q l r u ( w h i c h h e a l s o refers t o a s t h e i d i o m a t i c u s e o f a a u ) .

E e t k ~ c m a k e s a d i s t i n c t i o n b e t w e e n t h e y c o m p o u c d v e r b * a a g i r u

a n d the e x i s t e n t i a l v e r b a 'tc b e * :

"In E n g l i s h t h o v e r b * t c b e * h a s two u s e s : (i) i t i n d i c a t e s e x i s t e n c e w i t h o u t a t t r i b u t i n g q u a l i t i e s ; a s , there is a t ree , a t r e e is ( e x i s t s ) ; ( i i ) i t a t t r i b u t e s q u a l i t i e s ; a s , t h a t i s a tree; the t ree is l a r g e . I n t r a n s l a t i n g i n t o K a n a r e s e , i n the f i r s t c a s e t h e s i m p l e v e r b i d m u s t b e u s e d ; i n t h e s e c o n d case t h e compound v e r b a a a i r u is r e q u i r e d , . , So , o b b a m a x u s h v a n i d d a a ~ f , t h ~ r e is a man; m a n u s h y a n a a s i d d a a n e , h e is a mar, ( n o t a god , o r a n y o t h 2 r kind o f b e i n g ) . . , 19

( o p . c i t . ,p. 151)

T C a t is, f o r S p e n c e r , i a is a c e x i s t z n t i a l v e r b , a n d a a a i r u

is a c c p u l a . It is p r e c i s e l y t h i s d i s t i n c t i o c b e t w e e n the

Page 67: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

s t a t e m e n t of e x i s t e r x e and t h e s t d t e m o n t o f an e q u a t i v e

r r l a t i o a s h i p , t h a t h e mates b e t w e e n i l l a acd &

( o p . c i t . , p . 153) :

" A d i s t i n c t i o n s i m i l a r t o that b e t w e e n iruvunV a n d a a q i r n v u d u i s t o b e o b s e r v e d b e t w e e n t h e n e g a t i v e s ilfa a n d a l l a . I_lla r i e g a t i v e s ( s i c ) i r u v u d u , a c d denies e x i s t e n c e ; a l l a n e g a t i v e s (sic) a a a i r u v u d u , a n d d e n i e s t h o p o s s e s s i o n cf scae q u a l i t y . . . In b r i e f , illa = i r u v u d i l l a ; a l l a = a a q i r u v u d i l l a , These a i s t i c c t i o n s a r e o f t h e u t m o s t i m p o r t a n c e . T h o Kannada l a n g u a g e a l l o w s of co d e v i a t i o n from t h e m m t t

T h i s $s e q u i v a l e n t t o s a y i n g t h a t w h i l e i l l a n e g a t s s e x i s t e n c e ,

a l l a n e g a t e s e q u i v a l e n c e . However, S p e n c e r seems t o b e n o t

m e r e l y s e t t i n g u p s e m a n t i c rclcs, b u t s y n t a c t i c r e l a t i o n s h i p s ,

by s u g g e s t i n g t h a t a l l a = a a q i r u v u d i l l a , We m u s t n o t e t h a t

S p ~ n c e r d o e s not rasntiori a t a l l , the Kancada c o p u l a t i v e

c o n s t r u c t i o n t h a t h a s ~o v e r b o n t h e s u r f a c e , T h a t is, of t h e

two p o s s i b l e c o p u l a t i v e c o n s t r u c t i o n s

he t a k e s o n l y t h e s e c o n d i n t o a c c o u n t , a n d c l a i m s t h a t a l l a

a p p e a r s a s t h e n e g a t i v e ir. a c o n s t r u c t i o n l i k e (b) above .

T h e s t a t e m e n t t h a t i l l a d ~ n i e s e x i s t e n c e h a s

a l r e a d y been e n c o u n t e r e d i n s ~ c t i o n 3 . 0 , a n d we h a v e t h e r ~

p o i n t e d o u t i ts l a c k of g e n e r a l i t y . T h e e q u a t i o n ill% =

i r u v u d i l l a c a n b y no Beans b e t a k e n l i t e r a l l y $ and i t would --

Page 68: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

b6 aE i n j u s t i c e to S p o ~ c t r t c d o sc, H o u e v e r , S p e r i c e r 9 s

e x p l a n a t . i c n concprning a l l a , 3 r d h i s e q u a t i o n a l l ? =

a a q 5 r u v u d i l l a ( w h e r e a a q i r u I n a a q i r u v u d i l l a is c l e a r l y t o

bs t a k e n a s t h o *compound v e r b g r a t h e r t h a n a s t h e p e r f e c t i v e

cf t h e vfrb a a q u , *to h a p p e n , tc became'), r a i s e s s s r i o u s

issues c o n c e r n i n g t h e s y n t a x o f t h e c o p u l a t i v e s e n t e n c e i n

( h ) a b o v e , a n d the r e g u l a r i t y of f o r m a t i o n of the z e g a t i v e .

C o n s i d e r s e n t e n c e s ( 6 9 a - d ) , S p e n c e r d o a s n o t m e n t i o r . ( 6 9 a )

a n d ( 6 9 d ) ; a c c o r d i n g t c h i s analysis, (69b) is t h e n e g a t i v e 7

o f ( 6 9 ~ ) ~ w h i c h h a s a 'compound v e r b ' a a q i r u ,

6 9 a , a v a n u manuSHyanu. he man

Re is a man.

69b. a v a n u manuSHyacu a l l a . h e man n o t

H e is n o t a man.

6 9 c . a v a n u manuSHyan (u) - a a g i i d d - a a n e . h e man -AhGI be 3 r d p.m.sg.

He is a man.

69d. a v a n u manuSHyan (u ) - a a g i i l l a . h e man -AhGI is n o t

H e i s n c t a wac,

I f we c o m p a r e s e n t e n c e s (69c-d) w i t h ( 7 0 a - b ) b e l o w ,

uf may see t h a t t h e a f f i r m a t i v e s e n t e n c e s ( 6 9 c ) , (70a),

h a v e a f o r m o f the v e r b 1.u * t o b e a , a n d t h e n e g a t i v e

Page 69: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

sFr ~ E D C G S ( 6 9 d ) , (70b) , have t h ~ t m ilia, which has

' r e p l a c ~ d ~ t h e verb:

70a. a v a c u illi i d d - a a c o , h e h e r e b e 3 r d p,m.sg.

E e Is h e r e .

70b . a v a n u illi i l l a . ( * a l l a ) h e her^ is n o t

H e i s n e t here.

T h a t is , s e n t e n c e s w i t h t h e v e r b i d ( t o be' h a v e f o r m e d

t h e i r n e g a t i v e s with i l l a , w h e t h e r o r n o t iui i s a n

~ x i s t e n t i a l v e r b . I f we now t r y t o r e l a t e ( 6 9 c ) a n d ( 6 9 b ) ,

a s S p e n c e r does, o u r g rammar w i l l h a v e t o e x p l a i n how

a s e n t e n c e w i t h a c o p u l a t i v e v e r b iru ' t o b e t f o r m s i ts

n e g a t i v e w i t h a l l a , w h i l e a s e n t e n c e w i t h a n e x i s t e n t i a l

v e r b W 'to be* d o e s n o t (cf. (70b) a b o v e ) . Ee Bay

c c n s i d e r t h e a l t e r n a t i v e t h a t the v e r b i~ ( 6 % ) i s n o t

a f o r m of iru a s we h a v e s u g g e s t e d , b u t a conipound f o r m

a a q i r u , a s S p e n c e r s u g g e s t s . We w i l l still h a v e t o m e n t i o n

t h e n e g a t i o n of a a u i r u w i t h alla a s a n i r r e g u l a r i t y , i n t h e

l e x i c o n ; f o r the fcrm a a a i r u w h i c h is t h e p e r f e c t i v e of t h e

v e r b aesu ' t o h a p p e c , t c b e c c ~ s ' , t a k c s i l l a i n the n e g a t i v e :

71a. s a a r u them-aagi a a g ( i ) - i d e . s o u p ice -ABGI h a p p e c p s t - p a r t . be 3 r d p . n e u t . s g .

T h e s o u p h a s t u r n e d o u t well.

Page 70: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

71h . s a a r u c h e ~ c - a a g i a a g (i) -ills. s o u p n i c e - A A G I h a p p o r p s t . p a r t . i s c o t

T h e s o u p has n c t turned c u t well.

M o r e o v € r , we s t i l l h a v e t o a c c o u c t for ( 6 9 d ) ; we may h a v e t o

a l lc?w (doc) tc k a v e twc z c g a t i v e s , (E9b) a n d ( 6 9 6 ) . T h i s

l e a v e s o p e n t h e q u e s t i o n o f a n e g a t i v e s e n t e r - c e which c a n b e

s y n t a c + i c a f l y r e l a t e d t e (693) .

We s u g g e s t t h a t (69b) is t h e n e g a t i v e of (69a) , a n d

( 0 9 d ) t h e n ~ g a t i v e o f ( 6 9 c ) . T h e s y n t a c t i c r e g u l a r i t y in t h e

f c r m a t i o n of t h e n e g a t i v f is now s v i d e n t .

T h e r e is i n d e p e n d e n t e v i d e n c e t h a t -AhGI i n 169a-d) is

not a c a n s t i t u e n t cf the f o l l c w i n g varb ( i . e . , t h a t t h e r e is

r.o compound v e r b a a q i r u ) , b u t cf t h a p r e c e d i n g w c r d , wh ich may

b~ a ncur ; o r a n a d v e r b . T h u s i f we e x a m i n e t h e p o s i t i o c s o f

a d v e r b s we f i n d t h a t , w h i l e they may p r e c ~ d e c r follow t h e

W/Bdv. + A A G I s e q u e n c e , t h e y c a n n o t i n t e r r u p t t h i s s e q u e n c e

w i t h o u t d e s t r o y i n g t h e c o p u l a t i v e s t r u c t u r e o f t h e s e n t e n c e :

7 2 a . a v a n u manuSHyao (u ) - a a g i y a a v a t t u u i d d (u) -ills. h e man - A A G I n e v e r b e p s t . p a r t . i s n o t

He h a s n e v e r been a Ban.

72b . a v a n u y a a v a t t u u rnariuSHyari (u) - a a g i i d d (u ) -ills, h e n e v e r rrran - B A G I be p s t . p a r t . i s n o t

H E h a s n e v e r b e e n a mar.

Page 71: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

7 2 c . a v a n u manuSHyanu y a a v a t t u u a a g ( i ) - i d d ( u ) - 5 l l a . h P man c e v e r become p s t . p a r t . A s p e c t is c3t

* H e h a s n e v e r been a man, Me h a s n e v e r become a man.

S e E t e E c e ( 72c ) s h o w s t h a t when t h e Noun + A A G I s e q u e n c e is

i c t e r r u p t e d b y a n a d v e r b , a n i n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f t h e s e n t e c c e a s

a c c p u f a t i v e , w i t h a n c u n c o m p l e m e n t , i s ~o l o n g e r p o s s i b l e .

The i ~ t c r p r e t a t i o n of a a q i r u a s s, ' compoucd v e r b * c r u c i a l l y

d e p e n d s o n i t s b e i n g a c o c s t i t u e r t of t h e p r e c ~ d i n g word.

n o r e o v e r , a Noun + AAGI s e q u e n c e l i k e manuSHy-)-

a a q i ir. ( 7 2 a , b ) call be f o l f o w a d by o t h e r v e r b s t h a n 'to b e * ,

among t h e m t h e v e r b a a q u ' t o h a p p e n , t o b e c o m e * i t se l f . I f we

were t~ m a i n t a i n t h a t - A B G f f o r m e d a # u n i t f w i t h t h e f o l l o v i ~ g

v e r b , r a h f r t h a n t h e p r e c e d i n g n o u n , we s h o u l d h a v e t o

r e c o g n i s e a ~ u l t i p l i c i t y of ' compound v e r b s v , p r o b a b l y a n o p e n

set:

73 . k u D i y u v u d u b i T T u , i i g a a v a n u o n d u wanus Hyar. ( u ) - a a g i a a g i d d a a n e .

d r i n k i n g h a v i n g g i v e c u p , ncw h e a man-AAGf h a s b e c o ~ e .

H a v i n g g i v e r , u p d r i n k i n g , now ( a t l a s t ) h e h a s become a Ban.

7 4 . n a a ~ a k a - d a l l i a v a n u o c d u h u l i - a a g i b a n d a n u , p l a y l o c a t i v e h e o n e t i g e r - 8 A G f came

Tc t h e p l a y , h e came a s a t i g e r , * I n t h e p l a y , h e became a t i g e r .

Page 72: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

75. Raanu kanaDa-ge s t u d e n t - a a y i hoode . I C a n a d a - d a t , s t u d e c t - A A G I n e x t

1 wont tc C a n a d a a s a s t u d e n t .

E x a m p l e s c a n b e m u l t i p l i e d ; u n l e s s we a r e p r e p a r e d to p o s i t

a?! opoc se t of compound v e r b s * a a u i + V e r b * , we m u s t r e c c g c i s ~

t h a t - A A G I f o r m s a ' u n i t * w i t h t h e p r e c e d i n g word. T h i s will

a l s o a c c o u n t f o r t h e r e g u l a r i t y or mean ing . Wota t E a t *aaq i

a a q i d d a a c o g , ' a au i b a n d a c u ' 2nd '& boode arE c c t s e p a r a t e

i d i o m s , a l t h o u g h t h e v e r b v a r i e s .

We t h e r e f o r e m a i c t a i a t h a t t h e word h o u a d a r i e s i n

s e n t e r x e (69c) are a s we h a v e i n d i c a t e d , a n d n o t a s Spence r

s u g g e s t s . Spencer's d i s t i n c t i o n b e t w e e n i l l a a n d a l l a tbus

r e s t s c n a s p u r i o u s d i s t i n c t i o ~ b e t w e e n a a u i r u a n d Sru, a n d

l e a d s t o c o m p l i c a t i o n s ic a statement o f t h o f o r m a t i o n of

t h e n e g a t i v e .

Page 73: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

3 . 2 Be h a v e seen t h a t there a r e c o p u l a t i v e sentecces

i r Kannada whose s u r f a c e s t r n c t u r e 1s [ WP NP 1; an? we h 3 v e s

r,cted t h a t i n t h e n e g a t i v e s o f s u c h s e n t e n c e s , a l l a a p p e a r s .

Fo r e x a m p l e :

76. a v a n u oLLeyavanu a l l a . h e g o o d m a n n o t

HE is n o t a good man.

77, a v a n u d a k T a r a l l a . h e d o c t o r n o t

He i s n o t a d o c t o r .

78. i d u s a r i a f l a . t h i s r i g h t n o t

T h i s i s n o t right.

G i v e n that t h e s u r f a c e s t r u c t u r e of t h e s e s e n t e n c e s i s

[ NP BP 1, t h e q u e s t i o n ar ises a s t o t h e p o s i t i o n of alla ir! s s u c h s t r u c t u r e s , We may p r o v i s i o c a l l y p o s t u l a t e e i t h s r (i) o r

( i t ) a s the s u r f a c e s t r u c t u r e f o r (76) :

( i ) ( i i ) s

BP A N ?

I I I 1 / a v a n u o L L a y a v a n u a l l a

I a v a c u o L L e y a v a n u a l l a

#e are n o t c o n c e r n e d here with w h e t h e r a l l a i n fi) is s t r i c t l y

a c c n s t i t u e n t o f the NP o r of the N (ouo) , b u t w i t h w h e t h e r it

is a c c n s t i t u e n t o f N/NP o r cf some o t h e r n o d e , i . e . w h e t h e r

(i) o r (ii) is t h e a p p r c p r i a t e r e p r e s ; t r i t a t i o r ,

Page 74: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

T h s claim of ( i), t h a t a l i a is a c o n s t i t u e n t o f the

N/MP, c a n b e s u b s t a n t i a t e d h y quoting a v a r i e t y of e x a a p l s s ,

i n a d d i t i o n t o (76-78) a b c v e . T h u s we h a v e s e n t e n c e s like

(79-81) b e l o w , whore ( w i t h o u t going i n t o d e t a i l s o f t h e i r

s t r u c t u r ~ ) a f f a f o f l c w s R O U E S i r , t h e a c c u s a t i v e , d a t i v ~ a n d

a b l a t i v e c a s e s :

79. a v a n f u ) - a n n a a l l a c a a n u nooDiddu . b e acc, n o t I t h e s e e i n g i t

It was n o t him t h a t I saw.

8 0 , a v a n - i g e a l l a n a a n u haNa-vacnu koTTaddu. h e d a t , not I money acc. t h e g i v i n g i t

It was n o t t o h im t h a t 1 g a v e t h e money.

8 1 . a v a n - i n d a a l l a n a a c u haNa-vannu i i s k c N D i d d u . h e a b l . n o t I money a c c . t h e t a k i n g it

It was n o t fro^ him t h a t I took t h e money.

I f we t h e r e f o r e a c c e p t (i) as t h e c o r r e c t r e p r e s e n t a t i o n , wo

may p o s i t t h a t f a ) a nfq c a n b e a c o n s t i t u e n t o f t h e N/HP ir!

Kannada, (b) t h e p h o n o l o g i c a l f o r m of s u c h a n> i s a l l a , a n d

(c) t h i s a c c o u n t s f o r t h e o c c u r r e n c e of a f l a a n d n o t i l l a in

v e r b l e s s ( [ NP NP 1 ) s e n t e n c e s . s

However, a l l a c a n n o t b e generated within the N or MP,

b e c a u s e i t c a n n o t a p p e a r w i t h NP's i n n c n - c o p u l a t i v e s e n t e n c e s

w i t h v e r b s , I t i s t h u s a n s t h a t a p p e a r s i n v e r b l e s s c c p u l a t i v e

s e n t e n c e s , r a t h e r t h a n with N t s or NP8s. Our examples (19-81)

Page 75: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

a t o v e , which t r a n s l a t e a s c l e f t s e n t g n c e s , a r e a l l v e r b l e s s

c o p u l * t i v e sentences? i f we t + k e the a f f i r n a t i v e o f s c c t e n c ~

(80) above, its s t r u c t u r e is

82.t a v a n i g e ] [ n a a n u haNavannu koTTaddu ] NP NP

t o h im I t h e money t h e g i v i n g i t

It was t o hfm t h a t I g a v e t h e money,

T t e fern koTTaddu i n 180) a n d (82) i s n o t a f i n i t e v s r b , 9

b u t a n o m i n a l . It i s i m p o s s i b l e t o p l a c e f o c u s o n a n NP a n d

n e g a t e it w i t h a l l a i n s e n t e n c e s w h i c h d o n o t h a v e a n o m i n a f i s e d

v e r b , i . e . t h e c o p u l a r s t r u c t u r e o f MP NP 1. Compare S

(79-81) with (83-85) below, where t h e v e r b h a s r e m a i n e d f i n i t e :

8 3 . * a v a n - a n n a a l l a Eaanu fiocDi.de, h e acc, r . o t I saw 1 s t p , s g .

*It u a s n o t hi^ t h a t I saw.

84. * a v a n - i g e a l l a n a a n u haNa-vannu k o T T e , h e d a t . r.ct I money acc. g a v e 1st p . s g ,

*It was riot t o h i ~ t h a t I g a v e t h e ROGey.

85. * a v a n - i n d a a l l a n a a n u haNa-vannu i i s k c N D e . h e a b l , n o t I money acc. t o o k 1 s t p,sg.

*It was n o t f r o m h i m that I t o o k t h e money.

I t is a p p a r e c t , t h e c , t h a t a l l a c a n n o t b e a c o n s t i t u e n t of

the N c r NP, a n d we m u s t reject {i) a s a r e p r e s e x t a t i o n o f

Page 76: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

6ie t h e r e f o r e t u r r , t o a c o n s i d e r a t i o n of (2i) ( r e p e a t e d

h e m ) a s a r e p r i l s e n t a t i o n of (76) - (ii )

! I I i

a v a n u o L L e y a v a n u a l l a

F i g u r e i ) , e the p h r a s e s t r u c t u r e r u l e

claims t h a t t h e r e is a t h i r d , o p t i o n a l , n o d e b r a c c h i n g f rom S

i n s e E t e n c e s w h i c h h a v e t h e s u r f a c e s t r u c t u r e [ NP WP 1. S

Ir. t r y i n g to i d e n t i f y t h i s n o d e a n a f i n d other w o t i v a t i o c

f o r c l a i m i n g i ts 2 x i s t ~ n c e , we must c o n s i d e r t h e f o l l o w i a g

s e n t e n c e s :

7 7 a , a v a n u o L L ~ y a v a c u i r a - k e e k u . h e good an be m u s t

H e m u s t be a g o o d man.

77b . a v a n u o L L e y a v a n u i r a - bahudu , h e g o o d man be may

H e may be a g o c d man.

7 8 a . a v a n u o L L e y a v a n u i d d (u ) - i r a - b e e k u , h e g o o d mar be p a s t p a r t , b e m u s t

H e ~ u s t h a v e been a g o o d man,

7 8 b . a v a n u oLLeyavanu i d d (u ) - i r a - bahudu . h e g o o d man be past p a r t , b e may

H e may h a v e b e e n a g o o d man.

Page 77: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

In s e n t ~ n c e s (77-78) there occurs a v e r b to b e * ,

fo l lowed b y a modal , acd o p t i o r a l l y f o l l o w e d by aspect. Th?

mcda l c a n n o t o c c u r by i t s e l f i r t h e s e s e n t e n c e s , n o r car t h e

v e r b k u * t o b e * , by i t se l f : 10

7 9 a , * a v a n u oLLeyavanu beeku . + H e m u s t a good man.

790. * a v a n u o L L e y a v a ~ u bahudu . *He may a good mar.

80, * a v a n u c L L e y a v a n u i d d a a n e , h e good man be 3rd p. m.sq.

*A@ is a g o o d &an.

(cf, t h e -BAG1 c o n s t r u c t i o n : a v a r - u o L L e y a v a n (u) -aagi i d d a a n e . ) 11

3 - 3 I t fs e v i d e c t t h a t t h e s t r u c t u r e o f v ~ r b l e s s

c o p u l a t . i v e s e n t e n c e s c a n n o t be m e r e l y f NP NP 1. W e s t i o n s S

a r i s e a s t c t h 2 s t a t u s cf t h e v e r b id ' t o b e t w h i c h h a s

e m e r g e d i n t h e s e s t r u c t u r e s , a n d t h e i d e o t i t y o f t h e n o d e

u r d e r w h i c h the v e r b a l s e q u e c c e is to be g e n e r a t e d . For e x a p p l e ,

w h ~ t h e r t h i s n o d e c o n t a i n s a n y t h i n g e l s e b e s i d e s the v e r h a l

s e q u e n c e , i . ~ . w h e t h e r o r not t h e r e is a P r e d i c a t e P h r a s e node

d o ~ i n a t i n g the second NP and t h e v e r b a l sequence .

F o r t h e sake o f e x p o s i t i o n , l e t u s c a l l t h e n o d e

c o n t a i n i o g the v e r b a l s e q u e n c e a r d a l l a , A U X . We p o s t u l a t e a

Page 78: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

structure as in (iii) f o r s ~ r , t e r c e s (77-78) , ar .d w i l l justify

t h i s s t r u c t u r e 8 s we p r o c e e d .

I I I I a

a v a n u oLLeyavanu i r - b a h u d u ) a l l a ]

A U X w i l l be o p t i o n a l , a n d c o ~ t a i r . ( A s p e c t ) Flodal a n d a l l a . U n l i k e t h e ~ n g l i s h n o t - w h i c h a p p a r s i n s u c h s e q u e n c e s a s

n o d a l - n o t , n e i t h e r a l l a n o r i l l a c a n a p p e a r with a modal ,

t o negate it .

To a s c e r t a i n w h e t h e r t h ~ s e c o n d WP a n d A U X f o r m a

c o n s t i t u e n t P r e d P, we mus t d r a w o n e v i d e n c e from t h e

p o s i t i c n i n g o f a d v e r b s . T h e c o p u l a t i v e s e n t e c c e s we are

c o r . c e r n ~ d with do n o t ~er ia i t time a n d l o c a t i o n a l a d v e r b s ;

c n l y a d v e r b s e x p r e s s i n g s p e a k e r a t t i t u d e may o c c u r i n s u c h

s e n t e n c e s , C o n s i d e r now s ~ n t e n c e s (81a-d), ic w h i c h the

s e n t e n t i a l a d v e r b s n i j a v a a q a l u ' t r u l y ' a n d k h a N D I t a ' c e r t a i n l y '

c c c u r i n v a r i o u s p o s i t i c n s . We i n c l u d e t h e t o p i c - m a r k e r a n t u

c p t i o x a l l y , f o r t h e s a k e cf n a t u r a l n e s s :

81a . J o h r , ( a r t u ) [ n i j a v a a g a l u ) oLLe y a v a n u a l l a . [ k h a 8 D i t a

Johr , TOP f t r u l y ) g o o d m a n n o t { c e r t a i n l y )

( A s f c r J o h n ) , h e t r u l y / c e r t a i n l y is n o t a good man,

Page 79: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

8 1 b . Johr, { n i j a v a a g a l u f o L L r y a v a n u ( a n t u ) a l l a . { k h a N D i t a 3

John { t r u l y ] g m d man TOP n ~ t { c e r t a i n l y 3

(As f o r b e i n g a g o o d mar.), J o h n t r u l y / c e r t a i n l y is n o t o n e .

81c . J o h r cZLe y a v a c u ( a r , t u ) ifii j a v a a g a l u ] a l l a . I khaEaDita )

J o h n g o o d man TOP { t r u l y n o t { c e r t a i n l y )

(as f o r b e i n g a g o o d inan) , J o h n t r u l y / c e r t a i n l y is n o t one.

8 1 d . J o h n n i j a v a a g a l u oLLeyavanu ( a n t u ) k h a N D i t a a l l a . J o h n t r u l y g o o d man TOP c e r t a i n l y n o t

T r u l y , J o h n is c e r t a i n l y n o t a g o o d man.

T h e s e r . t e n c e s I n (81) s h o w t h a t s ~ n t e n t i a l a d v e r b s may o c c u r

b e t w e e n t h e s e c o n d NP a n d AUX ; t h i s would net b e p o s s i b l e i f

t h e r e were a nod^ Pred P d o m i n a t i n g t h a t KP a n d A U X :

I t r e i n a i n s t o j u s t i f y o u r d e n o m i ~ a t i c n of the t h i r d n o d e i n

t h e s e s t r u c t u r e s a s A U X , r a t h e r t h a n , f o r e x a m p l e , a VP

d o m i n a t i n g the V iru ' t o b e i a n d t h ~ ( A s p e c t ) H c d a l o r allla

c o n f i g u r a t i o n .

Page 80: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

There is a r e s t r i c t i o c ~c English a g a i c s t A U X

a p p e a r i n g i n n o n e t e n s e d (icfinitivzl a n d g e r u n d i a l f seZtecCes; 12

t h u s ( 8 2 ) , c o c t a i n i n g a moda l , i s u n g r a m l n a t i c a l ( r e c a l l t h a t

m o d a l s r e p r e s e n t t h e c c n f i g u r a t i o o AUX, -TENSE i n E s o n d s *

f r2P.f wc rk) :

E2. *Johr . p 2 r s u a d e d Wary t o { may ) g o t o the p o l i c e , { m u s t )

T h e r e a p p e a r s t o be a s i m i l a r r e s t r i c t i o n i n Kannada , a g a i n s t

t h e a p p e a r a n c e of m o d a l s i n t e n s ~ l ~ s s s ~ n t e E c e s . T u r n i n g t o

tho c o c s f d e r a t i o n of n o n - c o p u l a t i v e sentprices w i t h v e r b s f a r a

moment, i f we s t a t e t h e r u l e s f o r t h e e x p a n s i o n cf t h e VP in

r 3 K a n n a d a ( a s a first a p p r o x i m a t i o n ) a s f o l l o w s ,

( i v ) VP --> V AUX ( v ) A f J X --> ( A s p e c t ) { T e n s e p e r s o n - n u m b e r - s e n d e r I

f Modal 1

we may s t a t e t h a t A U X does n a t a p p e a r i n r o n - t e n s e d s e n t e n c e s .

T h a t s u c h a s t a t e m e n t is n e c e s s a r y may b e seeR from (83-85):

senter,ces (85a,b) a r e t h e r e s u l t of e n t b e d d i n g s e r t e n c e s

( 8 3 a f a n d (83b) i n (84) ; t h e s u b j e c t i n ( 8 3 a , b ) h a s

u c d e r g o n e E q u i - N P E e l e t i o n , T h e v e r b i n t h e embedded s e n t e n c E

h a s e ~ e r g ~ d a s a n i n f i ~ i t i v e :

8 3 a , Mary p o o l i s hatra hoe - d - a L u . R a r y p c l i c e n e a r g o p a s t 3 r d p . f . s g ,

Mary w e n t t o t h e p o l i c e ,

Page 81: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

8 3 b . Mary p o o l i s h a t r a h o o g a - bahudu , n a r y p o l i c e n e a r g o may

Mary may g o t o t h e p o l i c e .

8 4 , J o h n H a r y - a n n a o p p - isi - d - a n u , J o h n n a r y acc, agree cause past 3 r d p*ta,sg,

J o h n made Mary a g r e s ( J O ~ E p e r s u a d e d f l a r y ) .

853. J o h n n a r y - a n n a i [B; p o o l i s h a t r a h o o g a l u f c p p - i s i - d - a n u . J o h n Eiary acc, p c : i c ~ n e a r t o g o c a u s e d t o a g r e e

J o h n made E a r y a g r e e t o go t o t h e p o l i c e .

85b. * J o h n R a r y - a n n a ; [ $; p o o l i s h a t r a h o o g - b a h u d a l u ] o p p i s i d a n u ,

J o h n Mary acc. p o l i c e n e a r t o g o may c a u s e d t o a g r e e .

* J o h c made Mary a g r e e t o may g o t o t h e p o l i c e .

S ~ n t e n c e (85b) i s u n g r a m a a t i c a l b e c a u s e it c o n t a i n s t h e modal

b a h u d u 'may'. Frosl (85a) i t a a y b e s e e n t h a t n e i t h e r TENSE

n c r p ~ r s o n - n u m b e r - g e n d e r a g r e e m e c t h a v e a p p e a r e d i n t h e

i n f i n i t i v a l sentence; t h e v e r b , h o w e v e r , h a s a p p e a r e d a s

a n i n f i c i t i v e . R e f e r r i n g l o o u r r u l s s ( i v - v ) a b o v e , we see

14 t h a t i n (85a) AUX i s l a c k i n g .

I f t h e v e r b ia ' t o b ~ ' w h i c h h a s a p p e a r ~ d i n s e n t e n c e s

(77-78)

(77a. a v a n u oLLeyavanu i r a - b e ~ k u , ) (78a. a v a n u oLLeyavanu i d d ( u ) - i r a - b e e k u , )

were a b o n a f i . d e v e r b o c c u r r i n g o u t s i d a o f A U X , w e wou ld e x p e c t

Page 82: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

s ~ z t ~ ~ c r s ( 8 6 a , b ) be lo^ t o u c d e r g o Equi-WP d e l e t i o n when

e m b e d d e d ir, (87) ; the r e s u l t i n g ser-tcnces (88a, h) , h o w e v ~ r ,

a r e u n g r a m m a t i c a l , Even w i t h o u t t h e modal :

8 6 a . J o h n oLLeyavanu i r a - b e e k u . J o h c g o c d man b e m u s t

J o h c m u s t be a good man,

86 b. J o h n oLLeyavanu i r a -ba hudu. J o h n g o o d man be Bay

J o h n may be a g o o d man.

87. J o h n - g e i d u iSHTa i d e , J o h n d a t , t h i s l i k i n g i s

J o h n l i k e s t h i s ,

8 8 a . * ~ o h c - g e ; f !8; o l l e y a v a n u i r a - b e e k a l u ] iSHTa ide. J o h r , d a t . g o o d man be m u s t i n • ’ . l i k i n g i s

* J o h n likes t o m u s t b e a good man.

8 8 b . *Johr?-ge; [(U; o L L e y a v a n u i r a l u j fSHTa i d e . J o h n dat. qocd man t o be l i k i n g is

* J o h n l i k e s t o be a good mac.

I n t h e s e s e n t e n c e s , t h e n , iru never emerges u n l e s s a c c o m p a c i e d

b y a m o d a l ; it d o e s n o t a p p e a r a s a V a n d e x h i b i t T e n s e

and p e r s o c - n u m b e r - g e n d e r a g r e e m e r t , a n d it c a n n o t a p p e a r i n

i n f i r i t i v a l s e n t e n c e s , Compare s e c t e n c e s (86 -88) with (89-91)

b ~ l c u , where (89) is t h e c o p u l a t i v e s t r u c t u r e c a r r y i n g

the - A A G I m a r k e r a n d a verb i d e x h i b i t i n g p e r s c n - n u m b e r -

g s r i d e r a g r e e m e n t . Sentecce (89) l e n d s i t s e l f t o e m b e d d i n g u n d e r

(90). a n 6 t h e v e r b i d emerges a s a n i n f i n i t i v e , a s e x p e c t e d :

Page 83: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

89. J o h n o l l e y a v a n (u) - a a g i i d d - a a n e . J o h n g ~ c d mac -ABGI be 3 r d p.m,sg.

J c h n is a g o o d ffian.

90. J o h c - g e i d u iSHTa i d e . J o h n d a t , t h i s l i k i n g i s

Jchc l i k e s t h i s .

91. John-ge ; [g; GLLeyavar ( u ) - a a g i i r a l u ] i S A T a i d e . J c h n d a t . g o ~ d man - A B G I t o be l i k i n g i s

J o h n likes t o be a good man.

The form iru ( t o b e s i n wha t we h a v e b e e n c a l l i n g [ WP MP ] S

s t r u c t u r e s c a n n o t t h e r e f o r e b e a f u l l verb, b u t ~ u s t b e a c o o s -

t i t u e n t o f A U X , slcce it is p r c h i b i t s d f r o m a p p e a r i n g i n

i c f i n i t i v a l s . T h e a b s e n c e cf a V i n t h e s e s t r u c t u r e s would b e

c o ~ s i s + & n t w i t h their f a i l i n g t o u n d e r g o E q u i , s i n c e t h e s t r u c -

tural d e s c r i p t i o n would r o t he met, f e h y p o t h e s i s e t h a t Fru

a p p e a r s a s t h e r e s u l t cf a r u l e s o m e w h a t l i k e D c - s u p p o r t ,

a l t h o u g h we c a n n o t g o i n t o t h e d o t a i l s o f s u c h a r u l e here.

Ic s u c h sectences, a f l a i s s u b j e c t t o t h e s a m e

r e s t r i c t i o r s ; i t n e v e r a p p e a r s i c i n f i n i t i v a l s . We t h e r e f o r e

t a k e a l l a t o b e a c o n s t i t u e c t o f A U X . T h u s w h i l e I: NP MP j s

s E n t e n c e s a l l o w R a i s i n g t o S u b j e c t o r t o O b j e c t when R U X is

15 l a c k i n q , R a i s i n g i s n o t p o s s i b l e when A U X i s p r e s e n t , i n the

s h a p e of a m o d a l o r a l l a . Tho - A A G I marker a p p e a r s ( a s m e n t i o n e d

i n c h a p t r ~ r IT, f c o t c o t e ( 5 ) ) a s scme k i n d o f a COMP:

Page 84: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

92a . f J o h n oLLeyavanu a n t a ] kaaN - u t t - o . J o h n good man COHP setlm pres 3 r d p.nout.sg,

I t seeas t h a t J o h c is a gocd man.

92b. J o h n o L L e y a v a t (u ) - a a g i kaaN - u t t - a a c f . Johc good man - A A G I seem p r e s 3 rd p.m.sg+

J o h n seems t o b e a good man,

T h e e v i d e n c e f o r S u b j e c t - P a i s l r . g i n {92b) i s t h a t +be ve rb

kaaN- *seem* now a g r e e s w i t h ' J o h n ' , its s u b j e c t , r a t h e r

t h a n b e i r , g i n t h e i m p e r s o n a l n e u t e r f o r l a , a s i n ( 9 2 a ) .

S u b j e c t - E a i s i n g is c o t p o s s i b l ~ i f a l l a o r a moda l o c c u r s :

9 3 a . * J o h n o b L e p a v a r u a l l a - v a a g i kaaN - u t t - a a n e , J o h n good mac n o t -AAGI sEem p r e s 3 r d p.la.sg.

*John seeas t o not b e a good man.

93h. * J o h n oLLsyavacu i r a - b a h u d (u) - a a g i kaaN -utt- aane . lb

J o h c good man be may - A A G I seem p r e s 3rd p .m,sq .

*John seems t o Bay b e a good E a n .

S i m i l a r e x a m p l e s may be g i v e c fcr ~ a i s i n g - t o - 0 b ject,

Tho s t r u c t u r e o f (76) a v a n u oLLevavanu a l l a 'he i s

t o t a good man* is thus:

I \ I a v a n u oLLeya va nu a l l a

h e p o d mar, n o t

Page 85: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

T h e &o a l l a w i l l have tc b e s u b c a t s y o r i s e d t o a p p s a r o n l y

16 i~ +)?F context f HP - 1 . Siailarfy, Tense PNG will have tc be

r e s t r i c t e d t o s e n t e n c e s with a Verb. T h e s e s u b c a t e g o r i s a t i o r

rules and the base rule

S --> KP NF AUX

will gecera te v e r b l e s s c o p u l a t i v e s e r t e n c ~ s a n d t h e i r n e g a t i v e s , f7

i n Kacnada.

Page 86: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

1. t a d b h i n n a a r t h a k a : signifying t h a t t h a r p is a d i f f e r e ~ c e b e t w e e n two t h i n g s .

2, a b h a a v a a r t h a k a : s i g n i f y i n g t h a t s o m e t h i n g i s m i s s i n g o r l a c k i n g .

3. T h e r e i s o f t e n a s e m a c t i c shift ic a c c p u l a t f v e s e n t e r , c c w i t h - A A G I a n d t h e v e r b LA ; t h u s

a v a n u d a k T a r u h e d o c t o r

' h e is a d o c t o r *

i s a p l a i n f a c t u a l s t a t e m e n t , w h ~ r % a s

a v a n u d a k T a r - a a g i i a d a a n e he doc tc r -AAGI i s * h e is a d o c t o r '

may i m p l y a t e m p o r a r y s t a t e , o r a s t a t e r e c e n t l y r e a c h e d . T h e r e is t h u s a p o s s i b i l i t y o f i n s e r t i n g t i m ~ a n d p l a c e a d v e r b i a l s into t h e - A W G I s e n t e n c e s :

a v a n u i i g a b e n g a L c o r i n a l l i d a k T a r - a a g i i d d a a n e . h e now B a n g a l o r e i n doctor- A A G I i s

'Re now l i v e s i n B a n g a l o r e a s a d o c t o r *

It i s h o w e v e r p o s s i b l e t o f i n d s e n t e n c e s i n w h i c h no s u c h s e m a n t i c s h i f t o c c u r s , e , g . , o u r (62b). N a d k a r n i (1970: 188-1891 g i v e s o t h e r e x a m p l e s o f p a i r s of s e n t e n c e s t h a t h e c l a i m s t o be " p e r f e c t p a r a p h r a s e s o f e a c h o t h e r w . I n h i s d i a l e c t s u c h p a i r s e v e r . seem t o b e s y n t a c t i c a l l y r e l a t e d ( c f . f o o t n o t ~ 7 b e l o w . ) I n a n y case, o u r maic c o n c e r n h e r e is n o t t h e s e g a n t i c s o f t h e - A A G I c o p u l a t i v e s , b u t t h e f o r m a t i o z o f t h e n e g a t i v e i n s u c h s t r u c k u r e s .

4. A l t h o u g h t h e p r e d i c a t e word i n these s e n t e n c e s t r a n s l a t e s i n t c E n g l i s h sometimes a s a noun and s o ~ e t i m e s a s a n a d j e c t i v e , i n Kannada o n l y n o u n s may a p p e a r i n t h i s p o s i t i o n . T h e r e is t h u s n o way of s a y i n g * h e / s h e / it is g o o d * , a p a r t from s a y i n g ' h e is a g o o d - h e , s h e is a g o o d - s h e , it i s a g o c d - i t t ,

Page 87: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

5. S u c h a s e g m e n t a t i o n is a a d e p c s s i b l e b ~ c a u s ~ t h e o r t h o g r a p h i c u n i t i n Kannada is c o t i n v a r i a b l y t h e word, b u t may b e a p h r a s e ; i r _ S p e n c e r ' s e x a m p l e ,

i s o n e o r t h o g r a p h i c unit.

6. T h e t e n s e s p e c i f i c a t i o n s of i11a a n d i r u v u d i l l a a re d i f f e r e n t ; t h u s , w h i l e ifla t r a n s l a t e s a s 'is n o t * , i r u v u d i l 3 . a t r a n s l a t e s a s ' w i l l not b e * .

7. A l t h o u g h t h e d i a l e c t t h a t S p e r c e r d e s c r i b e s (i.e. t h e l i t e r a r y d i a l e c t ) is i d e n t i c a l w i t h mine i n mst r e s p e c t s , i t seems t h a t t h e r e may b e a d i a l e c t d i f f e r e n c e i n v o l v e d h e r e , T h u s N a d k a r n i ( 1 9 7 0 : 2 1 8 ) , i n a b r i e f d i s c u s s i o n o f UJa a n d a l l a , t a k e s up a p o s i t i o n e s s e n t i a l l y t h a t o f S p e n c e r ' s . a l l & is c i t e d a s t h e n e g a t i v e i n c c p u l a t i v e s e ~ t e n c e s : i s t h e n e g a t i v e o f t h e s t a t i v e v e r b a a a u ( i . e . , o u r -AhGI). T h e i ~ t e r e s t i n g f a c t is t h a t i n N a d k a r n i ' s d i a l e c t , u n l i k e i n t h e l i t e r a r y d i a l e c t , c o p u l a t i v e s e n t e n c e s w i t h o u t - A A G I a r e only o p t i o n a l l y v e r b l e s s , a n d N a d k a r n i i n f a c t d e r i v e s ron-ARGI c o p u l a t i v e s f r o m - A A G I c o p u l a t i v e s b y - A A G I d e l e t i o n . T h e p r o b l e m is t h a t n e i t h e r S p e n c e r nor N a d k a r n i p r c v i d e s c lear p a r a d i g m s ( a s o u r (69a-df ) , s o t h a t we a r e u n a b l e t o determine how far t h e d i f f e r e n c e s i n t h e a n a l y s i s o f n e g a t i o n a re due t o d i f f e r e n c e s of d i a l e c t . It is n o t c l e a r how a l l a c a n h e c o n s i d e r e d t h e n e g a t i v e of * t h e s t a t i v e v e r b a a s u * , a s it d o e s co t a p p e a r i f - B A G 1 is f o l l o w e d by a n y o t h e r v e r b t h a n b, A g a i n , % e i t h e r S p e n c e r n o r N a d k a r n i p r o v i d e s d a t a o n t h e b e h a v i o u r o f - A A G I a n d non-AAGI ser,tfr,ces u n d e r e m b e d d i n g , a n area i n wh ich we show t h e s e s t r u c t u r e s t o b e h a v e v e r y d i f f e r e n t l y (cf. E q u i , a n d R a i s i n g ) . T h e s t r u c t u r e s a r e a l s o d i f f e r e n t w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e a d v e r b s t h e y p e r m i t ( c f . f o o t n o t e (3) a b o v e ) .

8, Compare t h e s t r u c t u r e of t h e c l e f t s e n t e n c e ic ~ n g l i s h :

t h a t I e c j o y e d I a b e b u y i n g a new 4 I h a t I

( C l e f t s e c t e n c e e x t r a p o s i t i o n )

It was b u y i n g a new h a t t h a t I e n j c y c d .

Page 88: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

T h i s i s t h e a n a l y s i s of cleft sentences s u g g e s t e d b y A k m a j i a c ( I W O ) , a n d a c c e p + e d , w i t h a s l i g h t m o d i f i c a t i o c , by Pmonds ( 1 9 7 6 ) ,

9, A s ic E n g l i s h , t h e n o n - f c c u s s e d p a r t cf t h e c l e f t s e n t e n c e ( t h e t e x t r a p o s e d S g i~ A k m a j i a n ' s a n a l y s i s ) h a s some o f t h e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f a r e l a t i v e c l a u s e : koTTaddu is a r g u a b l y koTTa + a& , i.e. a r e l a t i v e p a r t i c i p l e p l u s the p r c n a u r , * i t s ( ' t h e h a v i n g - g i v e z - i t 1 ) , Ha s y s t e m a t i c s t u d y of t h i s c o n s t r u c t i o n i r i Kannada i s a v a i l a b l e .

1 0 . T b e f a c t s a r e sirttilar fcr my d i a l e c t o f T a m i l , a sister D r a v i d i a n l a n g u a g e , w h e r e a c o p u l a e m e r g e s o n l y ic c o n s t r u c t i o n w i t h m o d a l s :

avar i n a f l a v a n i r a k k u - l a a m / a a T T a a c h e g o c d man b e may p r o b a b l y n o t

'He may b e / i s p r o b a b l y n o t a g o o d man1

Ic m y d i a l e c t , these s e n t e n c e s h a v e t h e c e g a t i v e a n n i , whose b e h a v i o u r is p a r a l l e l t o t h a t o f a l l a ; e . g . , a v a n n a l l a v a n a n n i , * h e i s t o t a g o o d mani . T h e n e g a t i v e i l l o o c c u r s i n s e n t e n c e s w i t h v e r b s [cf. i l l a ) . I n o t h e r d i a l e c t s t h e r e seems t o b e n o s u c h d i s t i n c t i o n b e t w e e n a n n i am3 i l l e : i n t h e s e d i a l e c t s , i r u h a s b e e n c o n s i d e r e d a s a p p e a r i n g i n c o p u l a t i v e s e n t e n c e s a s well: cf. S c h i f f m a n 8 s ( 1 9 6 9 ) o b s e r v a t i o n : " T a a l i l iru ' b c * o n l y a p p e a r s i n c e r t a i n n e g a t i v e c o c s t r u c t i o n s w h i c h p a r a l l e l c e r t a i n p o s i t i v e c o n s t r u c t i o n s w h e r e i t is p h o n e t i c a l l y n o t p r e s e n t , . . 11 . . many s e n t e n c e s w i t h c o c o p u l a i n t h e a f f i r m a t i v e h a v e i n t h e n e g a t i v e , o r s o a e t h i n g wh ich h a s t o be c o n s i d e r e d a s r e l a t e d t o it, n a m e l y , t h e n e g a t i v e / i l l e / , "

( o p . c i t , ,pp . 183-84)

11 , T h o s e f a c t s c o n c e r n i n g i r u a r e t r u e o f t h e l i t e r a r y l a n g u a g e , a n d t h e s t a n d a r d S o u t h e r n d i a l e c t , T h e r e may b e d i a l e c t s w h e r e t h e c o p u l a i s n e v e r a b s e n t , e . g . , t h e d i a l ec t d e s c r i b e d i n N a d k a r n i (1970) . We h a v e n o t t a k e n t h e s e d i a l e c t s i n t o c o n s i d e r a t i o n .

1 2 . C f . B a o n d s (1976 :207 ,211) : s r , . . a n y r u l e s we a d d t o t h e g r a m B a r t o a c c o u n t f o r f i n i t e c l a u s e s s h o u l d d e p e n d c r u c i a l l y on t h e p r e s e n c e o f AUX ( o r TENSE) i n t h e s e c l a u s e s . It Cf. a1 s o J a c k e n d o f f ( l 972 :76 -77) ,

1 3 . I n v i e w cf t h e n e c e s s i t y o f t h e n o t i o n of ' s u b j e c t g f o r s u c h p r o c e s s e s a s E q u i - N P d e l e t i o n , Ref l ~ x i v i s a t i o n , a n d ( If t h e s e are t r a n s f o r m a t i o n s ) C a u s a t i v i s a t i o n a n d C ~ r e f e r e n t i a l S u b j e c t d e l o t i o c , we a s s u m e a QP i n Kannada . F o r a m o r e d e t a i l e d d i s c u s s i o n o f s u b j e c t h o o d , w i t h r e f e r e c c o t o t h e d a t i v e s u b j e c t , see S r i d h a r ( 1 9 7 6 ) .

Page 89: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

14. Some r u l e l i k e V e r b - R a i s i n g w i l l h a v e t o b e a d d e d t c t h n g r e m e a r t o r a i s e A s p e c t i n t c t h e YP a n d a l l c w i t tC a p p e a r IP i n f i n i t i v a l s a c d g e r u c d i a l s ; wc h a v e g i v e n i t s base p o s i t i o n a s a c c n s t i t u e c t o f AUX d u e t o i t s b e h a v i o u r in v e r b l ~ s s c o p u l a t i v e s e n t e n c e s .

15. O n l y v e r b l e s s c c p u l a t i v e s e c t e n c e s a l low ~ a i s i n g i n K a c n a d a , Bie h a v e n o e x p l a n a t i o n f o r t h i s a t t h e moment.

16 , T h r o u g h o u t t h i s t h e s i s , we refer o n l y t o t h e W a n d c o t t o t h e q u e s t i o n t a g a l l a , w h i c h may a p p e a r i n t h e f o l l o w i n g c o n t e x t s :

[ NP NP AUX --- 1 [ NP QP --- I

HE h a v e a s s u m e d t h a t t h e A U X w h i c h a p p e a r s a s a n o p t i o ~ a l n o d e i n WP NP [ A u x ) ] is t h e s a B e A U X w h i c h a p p e a r s ir. t h e r u l e BP --> , , , V A U X . s u c h a n a s s u m p t i o n c a p t u r e s t h e g e n e r a l i s a t i o n t h a t i n f i n i t i v a l s d o s o t c o n t a i n moda l s, w h o t h e r t h e y a r i s e from E ~ u F - N P d e l e t i o n { r e c a l l t h a t E q u i c a n n o t a p p l y t o S[ WP W P f s t r u c t u r s s i n K a n c a d a ) o r from R a i s i n g ( r e c a l f t h a t R a i s i n g i s p o s s i b l e o n l y o u t o f

NP NP ] s t r u c t u r e s i n K a n n a d a ) , b y e x c l u d i n g AUX f rom i n f i n i t i v a l s . B e i n g a n o n - p h r a s a l c a t f g o r y , A U X does n o t f a l l w i t h i n t h e s c o p e o f Emonds* Base ~ e s t r i c t 5 o n T :

" A b e a d - o f - p h r a s e c a t e g o r y of a l a n g u a g e L a p p e a r s o n t h e r i g h t s i d e of a t most o n e base r u l e of L . "

( o p . c i t . ,p . 1 4 ) Ernoads d o e s , however , t e n t a t i v e l y p r o p o s e a r e s t r i c t i o n w h i c h o u r r u l e s d o v i o l a t e : t t . . , a n y n o n - p h r a s a l c a t e g o r y c a n a p p e a r b u t o n c e i n t h e b a s e r u l e s , e x c e p t t h a t it may COOCCUR a s a n o p t i o n a l s y n t a c t i c f e a t u r e o n some o t h e r c a t e g o r y w i t h o u t b r e a k i n g t h e r e s t r i c t i o n . "

( o p . c i t , , p , 1 4 ; c f . a l s o p , 2 1 8 ) w i t h a few r e f i n e m e n t s , o u r r u l e s f o r K a n n a d a c o u l d p r ~ b a b l y be s t a t e d i n c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h i s t e n t a t i v e r e s t r i c t i o c ; it wou ld l e a d u s t o o f a r a f i e l d t o g o i n t o d e t a i l s h e r e , A more s e r i o u s p r o b l e m i s t h a t i t i s n o t a t a l l c lear how t o s t a t e t h o r e s t r i c t i o n s on t h e o c c u r r e n c e o f A U X , f o r S[ NP NP (AUX) ] se~ tecces . We c a n n o t s p e a k i r , terms o f I n o n - t e n s e d f o r * i n • ’ i n l t i v a l ' , b e c a u s e t e n s e a n d i n f i n i t i v e s n e v e r a p p e a r i n s u c h s e n t e n c e s ; t h e s e c a t e g a r i e s seem e n t i r e l y i r r e l e v a n t , Once a g a i r t h e s y n t a x cf -AAGf, w h i c h a p p e a r s i n t h e * i n f i n i t i v e s ' o f s u c h s e n t e n c e s , a s a COMP, seems t o be a c r u c i a l s u b j e c t f o r i n v e s t i g a t i o n ,

Page 90: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

CHAPTEE IV

I L L A A N D T H E NEGATIVE V E R B A L P A F T f C I P I E

4.0. All f i n i t e v e r b s i~ Kannada e x c e p t t h e v e r b b u

'tc b p i a p p e a r i n t h r e e tbars~s: n c L - p a s t icr p r e s e n t ) , r ~ a l i s ~ d

a s - u t t - ; p a s t , r e a l i s e d a s - ( i j d - ; ana f u t u r e , r e a l i s e d iis

1 -UY- . T h u s we h a v e t h e f o l l o w i c g p a r a d i g m :

bari , ' t o wri te* i r u , 'to b e '

(i) b s r i - u t t - e e n e wri te n o n - p s t 1 s t p, s g ,

I write/ w i l l write

(Li) b a r (i) - i d - e write p s t 1st p,sg .

I wrote

(lii) bari-UV-c3 write f u t 1st p - s g .

i r (u ) - u t t - e e n e be n o n - p s t 1 s t p.sg,

1 w i l l b e

i (xu) -dd-e b~ p s t 1 s t p , s g .

I: was

I w i l l write/ I u s e d t c w r i t e I w i l l be/ f u s e d t o b e

i d d - e e n e be 1 s t p - s g .

The m o r p h ~ m i c s t r u c t u r e o f i d d - e f n e is u c c e r t a i n ; the o t h e r

fcrms ( i d d - n @ - . ' y o u a r e * * i d t i - a a r e ' he is ' , f t c , ) a r e also

i n t e r p r e t e d a s p u r e e x i s t e n t i a l s . Fe w i l l speak o f t h e s e f o r m s

a s t h e ' t e n s e l e s s * f o r a s , f o r c o n v e n i e n c e . T h e r o d o s s not seem

t o b e a s t a n d a r d term a v a i l a b l e fo r them; t h u s Andronov (1969:

4 3 ) c a l l s the form cf iru i n (i) ' p r e s e n t g , a r d t h e form i n

( i v ) a y * p a r a l l e l 'irregular form,

Page 91: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

T h e r e l e v a n c e of t h e s e t e n s e l e s s f o r m s of ifu

'tc be' f o r ~ ~ g a + . i o r j s t h a t * h e f c r r n a t i n n of t h e r . ?ga t iv i ? i s

c c r r e s p o n d i n g l y i r r e g u l a r , I n t h e n e g a t i o n o f s e n t e n c e s w i t h a

f i r i t € v e r b , i f la u s u a l l y a p p e a r s a t t a c h € d t o a n o n - f i n i t e form

of t h e ~ a i n v e r b (or t h e a s p ~ c t u a l v e r b Iru 'to b e * , i f a s p e c t

i s p r o s e c t i n t h e VP) . T h e n o n - f l r i t e f o r m o f t h e m a i n or

a s p e c t u a l v e r b v a r i e s a c c o r d i n g t o t h e t e n s e c e g a t e d . When t h e

t e r se r e g a t e d i s PAST, t h e i r : f i n l + i v s [ e n d i n g i n -&) e E e r g e s ;

when t h e t e ~ s e n e g a t e d is NOW-PAST, a p a r t i c i p i a l or ' v e r b a l

n o u n * emerges? T h e s e p a t t e r n s held f o r t h e c o p u l a t i v e a s well

a s t h e e x i s t e c t i a l a n d t h e a s p e c t u a l i k u ( t h e n ~ g a t i v e fcrrns d o

n o t e x h i b i t p e r s o n - n u m b e r - g e n d e r (PNG) a g r e e m e n t ) :

(v ) b a r e y a l {u) -ills i r a l (u ) - 1 l l a b a r e d ( u ) - i r a 1 (u) -ills writ€ iof, n o t be in•’, c o t writs be i n • ’ , n o t

p a s t p a r t , ASPECT

dLd n o t write was n o t had n o t w r i t t e n

(vi) b a r e y u v u d ( u ) -ills i r u v u d f u ) - i l l a b a r e d ( u ) - i r u a u d @ ) - i l l a write p a r t , not be p a r t . n o t v r l t e b e p a r t . nct

p a s t p a r t . ASPECT

w i l l n o t write 1 w i l l n o t b~ w i l l n o t h a v e w r i t t e ~ d o e s n o t u r i t e )

# h e n i r u o c c u r s ic the t e r s e l o s s f o r m , h o w e v e r , i t i s ' r e p l a c ~ d *

b y i l l a i n t h e n e g a t i v e , i , e . n o form o f i i e m e r g e s o n t h e

s u r f a c e , T h i s a g a i n i s t r u e o f t h ~ c o p u l a t i v e , t h ~ e x i s t e n t i a l

acd t h e a s p e c t u a l i r u . Be h a v e a l r e a d y ccmf a c r o s s some examples

of t h i s phenomenon:

Page 92: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

94a. avaou oLLeyavan (u) - a a g i i d d - a a n e . h e g o o d man - A A G I b e 3 r d p ,n . sg .

He is a g o o d man.

94b. a v a n u o L L e y a v a n ( u ) - a a g i i l l a . he g o o d man - B A G 1 i s n o t

H e is n o t a good man.

95a . a v a r u illi i d d - a a n e . h e here be 3 r d p.m. sa.

HE is here,

95b. a v a n u illi i l l a . he here is n o t

He is n o t here.

9 6 a . a v a n u b a n d (uf - i d d - a a c e . he come pst p a r t . b e ASPECT 3 r d p . ~ , s g .

H e h a s come.

96h . a v a n u b a n d (u) -ills. he come p s t p a r t . i s nct

H e h a s n o t come.

or. tke s u r f a c e , t h e p a r a d i g a i s r e g u l a r , a n d it a p p e a r s t h a t

the n o c - a p p e a r a c c e o f iru i n the c e g a t i v e of the t e n s e l e s s

forms c a n be h a n d l e d by a s i m p l e f x t e n s i o n o f t h e r u l e s which

d e r i v e the o t h e r n e g a t i v e f o r ~ s , by s p e c i f y i n g t h a t when

TENSE is m i s s i n g , iru --> 0 . However, t h e r e a r e some a d d i t i o r a l

facts t o b e t a k e n i n t o account.

Page 93: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

4.1 We h a v e s e e n ic C h a p t e r 11 t h a t -3 is an

emphatic morpheme which m y be p c s i t i o r e d e f t e r N P ' s . It Ray

a l s o a p p Q a r i~ t h e VP, I n s f f i r m a t i v e s e n t t c c e s , -u a p p e a r s

a t t a c h e d t o a p a s t - p a r t i c i p l e c o p y cf t h e ~ a i c v e r b , p r e c e d i n g

t k c ~ a i ? v e r b , There i s a n c t h s r s r r t p h a t i c -= v h i c h b e h a v e s if,

t h i s way ( i n t r a n s l a t i o r . , stress is i n d i c a t e d b y ( '1 ) :

9 7 a , a v a n u b a n d ( u ) -uu b a r - u t t - a a n e . h e CORE p s t . p a r t EMP ccme n o n - p s t 3 r d p.m. s g ,

97b. a v a n u b a n d ( u ) -ee b a r - u t t - a a r i ~ , he come p s t - p a r t EBP come n o n - p s t 3 r d p ,m,sg .

He n i l 1 c e r t a i n l y come.

9 8 a , a v a n u bandfu) - u u h a n d (uf -had-aane . h e come p s t , p a r t EHP come p s t . p a r t be ASPECT 3 r d p , n ~ , s g ,

H e ' h a s come, t o o ,

9 8 b . a v a n u b a n d f u ) - ee b a c d (u ) - i d d - a a n e . h e ccme p s t . p a r t EHP come p s t , p a r t be ASPECT 3 r d p .a . sg .

He has c e r t a i n l y ccme.

It may be seen f r o m (98a,b) t h a t fPlP does c o t a t t a c h t o a v e r b

i n t h e o r i g i n a l v e r b a l s e q u e n c e , e v e n i f a p a s t p a r t i c i p l e

is a l r e a d y p f e s e n t in t h a t s e q u e n c e , I n n e g a t i v e s e n t e n c e s ,

however , ERP a t t a c h e s t o w h a t e v e r non-finite forms a r e p r e s e n t

in t h e o r i g i n a l v e r b a l s e q u e n c e , If t h e v e r b a l s e q u e n c e

c c n t a i n s a n o n - f i n i t e a s p s c t u a l v e r b , EHP may a t t a c h to e i t h e r

t t e mairi o r t h e a s p e c t u a l v e r b :

Page 94: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

992.. a v a r u b a r u v u d ( u ) -uu ilia. he come p a r t . EHP not

He d o e s r ' t even come/ h e won't evGn corns.

99b. a v a n u b a n d f u ) -uu i ruoud ( u ) i l l a . he c o a e p a r t , EHP b e p a r t . n o t

HE w o c s t e v e n h a v e come,

99c. a v a n u h a n d (u) i r u v u d (u) -uu i l l a . h e coae p a r t . be p a r t . EHP c o t

He won't e v e n have come.

9 9 d . a v a n u b a n d fu) -uu i l l a . he conif p a r t . EBP n o t

H e h a s n ' t e v e n ccme.

Sectence (99d) i l l u s t r a t e s t h e case where the ifu h a s been

' r e p l a c e d f by U. I n t h i s sentence EHP c a n only a t t a c h t o

a form of t h e v e r b ' t o comei; i t c a n n o t copy illa a n d a t t a c h

t o it:

99e. *avanu band f u ) -ills -vuu i l l a . h e come p s t . p a r t n o t EMP n o t

H e h a s n ' t e v e n come.

B u t now c o n s i d e r s e n t e n c ~ s (100-101 a-c) :

1 0 0 a , a v a c u ilfi i E d - a a c e . h e h e r e be 3 r d p.m.sg.

B e is here.

100b , a v a c u i f l i i l l a , he here is not

He is not here.

Page 95: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

IOOc, avar iu illi i l l a - v u u i l l a . fie h e r e r o t EMP i s r o t

He isc't e v e n here.

101a . mee j u a g a l a - v a a g i i d - F . t a b l e width - A A G I be 3rd p . n e u t . s g .

The t a b l e is wi0e.

10 1 b. m e e j u a g a l a - v a a g i i l l a . t a b l e w i d t h - A A G f i s nct

The t a b l e is n o t wide.

1 0 1 ~ . meeju a g a l a - v a a g i i l l a - v e e i l l a . t a b l e w i d t h - A A G I n o t EnP is n c t

The t a b l e is n o t w i d e a t a l l .

I n t h ~ 6 e s e n t e n c e s , EffP h a s a t t a c h e d t o a c o p y o f t h e n e q

i l l a . T h i s p r o c e s s is s i m i l a r t o t h a t o f EBP a t t a c h m e n t

t o a l l a :

102. a v a n u oLLeyavanu a l l a - v e e a l l a . he g o o d man n c t ERP n o t

H e is c e r t a i n l y n o t a g o d man.

W E h a v e s e e n t h a t i n ( 1 0 2 ) , a l l a is t h e o n l y e l e m e n t i n t h e

AUX. I t seeBs, t h e r e f o r e , t h a t I n (IOOb, 101b) =a is t h e

o n l y e l e m e n t i n t h e VP c o m i n g from t h e b a s e , a n d t h a t t h e r e

is n o p r o c e s s o f i l l a - a t t a c h m e n t t o L u and k u - d e l e t i o n .

For - - d e l e t i o n would b e either a m o r p h o p h o n ~ m i c r u l e , or a

dolet ior- rule; i n e i t h e r case, this r u l e wcu ld a p p l y a f t e r t h e

t r a n s f o r m a t i o n a l componen t . E B P - a t t a c h m e n t , being a c o p y i n g

Page 96: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

T U ~ E , stems t y p i c a l l y a t r a a s f c r m a t i o i l a i r u l e . T h e r e is t h u s

nc r e a s e n not t o expect to s u r f a c e f o r EM!? t o a t t a c h t o ,

i f s u c h s e n t e n c e s h a d iru c o m i n g fro^ l e x i c a l i n s e r t i o n .

T h ~ r e i s c ther e v i d e n c e f c r g e n s r a t i n g ifla as a

n ~ g a t i v o e x i s t e n t i a l v e r b o r AUX, i n d e p e n d e n t l y of k u .

F i r s t l y , ,113 a p p e a r s i n s e n t e n c e s w h e r e iru c a n n c t a p p e a r .

1 n the c o r r e s p o n d i n g a f f i r m a t i v e s uNTu, a d e f e c t i v e

e x i s t e n t i a l verb , a p p e a r s i n s t e a d :

1 0 3 a . [ a v a n u i d - a n n a h e e l i d d u 1 uMTu. ( *ide) MP

h e t h i s a c c , t h e h a v i n g - s a i d - i t e x i s t s

(It i s a f a c t t h a t ) ke h a s s a i d this.

103b , [ a v a n u i d - a n n a h e e L i d d u j i l l a . NP

h e t h i s acc, t h e h a v i n g - s a i d - i t i s c o t

(It i s r , o t a f a c t t h a t ) h e h a s s a i d t h i s .

Ir! ( 1 0 3 b ) i l l a cannot c o w from a t t a c h a t e n t t o w, for t h e

s o u r c e is u n g r a ~ m a t i c a l ,

S e c o n d l y , i l l a o c c u r s i n c o n t e x t s where n o

a f f i r ~ a t i v e e x i s t e n t i a l v e r b may o c c u r :

3 104a . [ i d - a n n a r saa l ) a l (u ) - i k k e ] i l l a . NP

t h i s acc, d ~ irf. d a t , is pot

One c a n n o t d o t h i s { t h i s is p r o h i b i t e d ) .

Page 97: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

104b. *[ i d - a n n a maaDa1 j u ) - i k k e ] ide/uNTu, NP

this ~ C C . d c inf, dzt. i s / e x i s ? s

*One c a n do t h i s (t-his is a l l o w e d ) .

4.2 A d e t a i l e d a n a l y s i s of t h e s t a t u s o f i l l a would

r e q u i r e a d p t a i l e d a n a l y s i s o f t h e VP i n K a ~ n a d a . Here we c a n

o c l y g i v e a few t e n t a t i v e s u g g e s t i o c s t o w a r d s a s o l u t i o n f o r

t h e s y n t a x of i l l a ,

F i r s t , i t is n o t l i k e l y t h a t i l l a i r (100-101)

is g e n e r a t e d a s a main v e r b , evec though i t is t h e s o l e v e r b a l

4 e l ~ a e c t i n t h e s e n t e n c e . It is more l i k e l y t h a t i l l a i s a n A U X ,

ar-d t h a t a Kannada VP is a l l o w e d t o c o n s i s t of m e r e l y A U X u n d e r

c e r t a i r , c o n d i t i c c s , p r o b a b l y specif i a d i r t s t r ic t subca tegcr i sa -

tion, W E have s e e n t h a t t h e ERP r u l e way c o p y a n A U X i f c o ~ a i c

v e r b is a v a i l a b l e (cf, (102) ) . S i n c e i n (99d) a mair, verb is

a v a i l a b l e , (99e) is u n g r a m m a t i c a l . We s u g g e s t be low t h a t t h e

c o p y i ~ g of i l f a i n (99e) is b l o c k e d b e c a u s e t h e r e i s a l r e a d y

a c o n - f i n i t e v e r b p r e s e n t i n t h e p o s i t i o o i n t o which the EXP

r u l e c o p i e s a v e r b .

Page 98: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

There a r e two a r g u m e r t s a g a i n s t illa b e i n g a main v e r b ,

I+ c a n n o t occur in i n f i n i t i v a l s lc tecces, a c d i t cascct takc

t b e c c n d i t i o n a l suffix -a- . These a r e t y p i c a l l y r e s t r i c t i o n s

on AUX, Sentecce (105al h a s b e e n embedded i n ( 1 0 5 b ) , a n d E q u i

h a s a p p l i e d , T h e r e s u f t , ( 1 0 5 ~ ) ~ is u n g r a m m a t i c a l :

105a. avar iu illi i l l a . fie here is oct

H e i s not h e r e .

1 0 f b . a v a n i g e i d u iSBTa i l l a . h e d a t . t h i s l i k i n g is n o t

He does not. l i k e t h i s .

1 0 5 ~ . * a v a n i g e ; [ f3; i l f i i l l a l u 1 iSHTa i l l a , h e d a t . h ~ r e t o not-be i i k i ~ g i s not

He doesc't wish not tc be here.

F c r s u c h a sentence t o b e g r a ~ ~ a t i c a l , a c o n s t r u c t i . c n w i t h t h e

' c e g a t i v e v e r b a l p a r t i c i p l e 1 i s r e q u i r e d . We will b r i e f l y

e x a m i ~ o t h e s y n t a x of s u c h c o n s t r u c t i o n s b ~ l o w , Compare (105c)

w i t h ( 1 0 6 ~ ) ~ w h i c h i s a result cf embedding (lO6a) into w 6 b ) :

106a . a v a ~ u ifli i l l - a d e e i d d - a a n e . h~ h e r e be n e g . p a r t , be 3 r d p.m. sg.

H e i s n o t h e r e .

106b. a v a n i g e i d u iSHTa i l l a . EG d a t . t h i s l i k i n g i s n o t

He does n o t l i k e this.

Page 99: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

7 0 6 ~ . a v a n i g s ; [ 6; ilii ill-adee i r d l u ] iSHTa i l i a . be d a t . herr b e r e g . y a r t . t c b o l i k l c g i s ~ 9 t

He d o e s n ' t wish n o t t o b~ h e r e .

S i ~ l l a r r e s u l t s o b t a i ~ when ilfa is c o t t h e scle v ~ r b a l

elemec+ i n the seatence, b u t cccurs w i t h a ~ a i c v ~ r C .

107a , Esry p o o l i s h a t r a h o e g a l (u ) -ills. B a r y police n e a r g o inf, not

Mary d i d n o t go t o t h e p c l i c e .

107h. J o h n Hary-anna o p p - i s i - d - a n u , J o h n Mary acc. a g r e e c a u s e p s t , 3 r d p.m. sg -

J o h n p e r s u a d e d Hary.

107c. * J o h n Mary-anna; [ fia p o o l i s h a t r a h o o g a l i l l a l u 3 a p p i s i d a n u .

J o h n n a r y a c c . p o l i c e n e a r g o - n o t - i n f . p e r s u a d e d

J o h n p e r s u a d e d Bary n o t tc go t o t h e p o l i c e .

c o m p a r e (107c) with ( lO8c) :

108a. f f a r y p o o l i s h a t r a h c c g - a d e e i d d a l u . Yary p o l i c e n e a r g o neg, p a r t . b e p s t . 3 r d p.f . sg .

Mary d i d n o t g c tc t h e p o l i c e .

108b. J o h n Mary-anna o p ~ - i s i - a - a n u . J o h n Mary acc. a g r e e c a u s e pst. 3 r d p, m.sg.

J o h n p e r s u a d e d n a r y ,

fO8c. J o h n Bar y-anna; [ $3; p o o l l s h a t r a h o o g - a d e e i r a l u 1 o p p i s i d a n u .

J o h n Mary acc. p o l i c e n e a r g o neg. p a r t . be inf, p e r s u a d e d .

J o h n p e r s u a d e d Mary n o t t o g o t o t h e p o l i c e ,

Page 100: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

T h e c o n d i t i o n a l s u f f i x -= is ic c o m p l e m e n t a r y

d i s t r i b ~ t i o ~ w i t h TZNSE PMG and i l f a , i . e . , with A U X :

1 0 9 a . a v a n u b a n d f u ) - i d d - a r e n a a n u h o o g - u t t - e e n e . h e ccme p s t p a r t , h e COND I g o n o n - p s t 1 s t p . sq .

Tf hs h a s come, I u i l : gc.

1090. a v a n u b a n d ( u ) - i d d - a r e c a a n u h o o g u t t a - i d d e . h e COBP p s i p a r t . b e C O E D f g c p r s s . p a r t be ASPECT

If h e h a d come, I wcu ld h a v e g o n e .

109c . * a v a n u b a n d fu) -ill a - d a r e n a a n u h o o g u t t e e n e . h e c o w p s t - p a r t n o t COND I w i l l g o

*If h e h a s r o t coBe, I w i l l go.

Nctice t h a t i n ( 1 0 9 a , h ) , t h e fo rm o f t h e v e r b i n ths c o n d i t i o n a l

c l a u s e d o e s n o t c a r r y terse; i t is i n t e r p r e t e d a s * p a s t q or

' p r e s e n t 8 d e p e n d i n g on t h e t e n s e i n t h e ma in c l a u s e . P N G suffixes

are o b v i o u s l y l a c k i n g , a n d t b ~ p r e s e c c a of i l l a i r . ( 1 0 9 c )

r f n d c r s the s e n t e n c e u n g r a m ~ a t i c a l . CorrrparE ( 1 0 9 d ) :

109d . a v a n u b a r - a d e e i d d - a r e r a a c u h o o g u t t e e c o , h e come n s g - p a r t be COND 1 w i l l g o

I f h e d o e s n ' t c o w , I w i l l go.

o n c e a g z i n t h e o n l y p o s s i b l e n 5 g a t i v e is t h e ' n l g a t i v e v e r b a l

p a r t i c i p l e B , I l l a c a n n o t t a k e t h e c o n d i t i o n a l s u f f i x e v e n if

t h ~ r o is n o ma in v e r b i n t h e s e r t e n c e :

1 1 0 a . *illi a k k i I f l a - a r c a l l i nooDu, h e r e r ice no t COWD there l o o k

If t h e r e is nc rice here, l o o k ( f o r i t ) t h e r e .

Page 101: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

110b . ill: a k k i i l l - a d e e i d d - a r e alli nooDu. h e r € r ice n o t neg.part ke COMD there l o o k

T f t h e r e is n o r l c o here , l o o k ( f o r i t ) t h e r e .

Be c o n c l u d e t h i s s ec t i cc with a b r i e f c o t e oo tts

s t a t u s o f t h e n o r - f i n i t ~ f c r a s c f t h e v e r b i n a VP i n w h i c h

i i i a o c c u r s . T h e s e n o n - f i n i t e f c r m s a re d i f f e r e n t f r o m t h e

n o n - f i n i t e ( p a s t p a r t i c i p l e ) f o r m s i n a • ’ f i r m a t i v c s e n t e n c e s

w i t h a s p e c t ; w h i l e EMP a t t a c h m e n t a l w a y s r e s u l t s i n a c o p y o f

t h e l a t t e r f o r m s , i t never r e s u l t s i c a c o p y o f the former

for~s. From EMP-attachmerit it a f f i r m a t i v e s e n t e n c e s , we h a v e

seex t h a t t h e r e m u s t b~ a p o s i t i o r f o r a n o c - f i c i t e v e r b , t o

t h ~ l e f t o f t h e first v e r b ic t h e v e r b a l s e q u e n c e :

h e come p s t . p a r t EHP w i l l come

H e w i l l c e r t a i n l y come.

I f o u r a n a l y s i s of ills is s u c h t h a t t h e a a i n a n d , o p t i o n a l l y

t h e a s p ~ c t u a l v e r b s move i c t o t h e n o n - f i n i t e v e r b p o s i t i o n ,

tEr s t a t e m e n t o f E f f P - a t t a c h m e n t w i l l be e n o r m o u s l y s i m p l i f i e d .

I n n e g a t i v e s e n t e n c e s , t h i s v e r b p o s i t i o n w i l l a l r e a d y b e

5 f i l l e d , a n d EMP w i l l a t t a c h t o t h e v e r b i n t h i s p c s i t i o n .

Page 102: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

4.3 T h e nap-finite v e r b p o s i t i o n i n (i) abcve Is

u t i l i s e d f o r the ' n e g a t i v e v e r b a l p a r t i c i p l s * . Thus sectecce

(1 11) w o u l d h a v e the fo1lowir.g s t r u c t u r e :

1 1 l a . a v a c u b a r - a d f e F r u v u d ( u ) -ills. h ~ . come r ,eg,par t . bz p a r t , riot

He wonr t not cotse, (he wor"t r e ~ a i n w i t h o u t c o m i n g )

I

a v a n u b d r - a d ~ ~ i r u v u d (u ) - i f l a

We h y p o t h e s i s e that bar - ad€ e i r i (111) is i n t h e n o n - f i n i t e

p o s i t i o ~ , b e c a u s e ESP c a n a t t a c h t o it a n d c a n n o t make a

c o p y of i t :

I f 1 b. a v a n u b a r - a d e e -nuu i r u v u d (u) -ills. h e come n e g , p a r t . EMP be p a r t , n o t

H E d o e s n ' t even r e f r a i n f r o m c o m i n g .

1 l lc . * a v a n u band (u) -uu b a r - a d e e i r u v u d ( u ) -ills.

T h e r e a r e t u o p o s i t i o n s f o r ir! t h e Vp, The f i r s t p o s i t i o n ,

t h a t of t h e n o n - f i n i t e v e r k , w a y be occupied by t h e ' n e g a t i v e

v e r b a l p a r t i c i p l e ' . T h e s e c o n d i s t h e A U X p o s i t i o n t h a t t h e geg

Page 103: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

; 3 3 c c c u p i s s . In our exaiaples ( I l l a - b ) abcvo , b c t h these n a

p c s i t i o n s h a v e b e e n filled, b u t I t is is p o s s i b l e fcr ocly

t h e f i r s t p o s i t i o n t o b e filled, a s i n (108a) a b o v e . We h a v e

s e w t h a t t h e on-finite v e r b p c s i t i o n i s the o n l y n s p o s i t i c n

which czn occur i n i R f i n i t f v a l a cd c o n d i t i c c a l c l auses ,

Page 104: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

Ne

ga

tiv

e

Fo

rms

wit

h -

il

la

Sim

ple

Te

nse

s

ve

rb

ba

ri,

to

wri

te1

1.

ba

ri

- u

vu

d(u

) -

il

la

w

rite

p

ar

tic

iple

n

ot

do

es

no

t w

rite

w

il

l n

ot

wri

te

2.

ba

ri

- y

al(

u)

- i

ll

a

wri

te

inf

init

ive

n

ot

did

no

t w

rite

ve

rb

iru

, 't

o b

e'

-

ir

-

uv

ud

(u)

- i

ll

a

be

pa

rtic

iple

n

ot

wi

ll

no

t b

e

ir

-

al(

u)

- i

ll

a

be

in

fin

itiv

e

no

t

was

n

ot

il

la

is n

ot

Com

poun

d T

en

ses

4.

ba

red

tu)

- i

ll

a

wri

te

pa

st

pa

rtic

iple

n

ot

ha

s n

ot

wri

tte

n

5.

ba

red

(u

) -

i ru

vu

d (

u)

- i

ll

a

wri

te p

st.

pa

rt.

be

pa

rti

cip

le

no

t

wi

ll

no

t h

av

e w

ritt

en

6.

ba

red

(u)

- i

ra

l (u

) -

il

la

w

rite

ps

t.p

art

. b

e

inf.

n

ot

ha

d

no

t w

ritt

en

Page 105: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

TA

BL

E

I1

co

nt'

d.

7.

ba

riy

utt

(a)

- i

ll

a

wri

te p

res

en

t p

ar

tic

iple

n

ot

is n

ot

wri

tin

g

8.

ba

r iy

ut t

(a

) -

iru

vu

d(u

) -

il

la

w

rite

pre

s.

pa

rt.

b

e

pa

rtic

iple

n

ot

wi

ll

no

t b

e w

riti

ng

9,

ba

riy

utt

ta)

- i

ra

l (u

) -

ill3

w

rite

pre

s.

pa

rt.

be

in

f.

no

t

was

n

ot

wri

tin

g

Page 106: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

1, T h e f o r m s q u o t e d b e l o w dc n o t r e p r e s e n t t h e s p o k e n l a ~ g u a g e . C f . t h e p r e f a c e f o r a n e l u c i d a t i o n c f t h e s y s t e m of t r a n s c r i p t i o x a d o p t e d i n t h i s work ,

2. T h e r e i s n o n e g a t i v e f c r a w h i c h c a n b e r e l a t e d t o a v e r 5 i n t b ~ f u t u r e t ~ n s ~ , I n u sage , t h e n e g a t i v e cf t h e n o n - p a s t t e n s e o c c u r s when t h e n e g a t i o n r e f e r s t o f u t u r e time ( t h e n c n - p a s t a f f i r m a t i v e v e r b may a l s o refer t o f u t u r e t i m e ) . T h e n e g a t i v e o f t h e p a s t p r o g r e s s i v e v e r b form o c c u r s when t h e n e g a t i o n r e f e r s t o a h a b i t u a l a c t i o n ( a g a i n , t h e p a s t p r o g r e s s i v e a f f i r m a t i v e v e r b may r e f e r t o h a b i t u a l a c t i o n , ) The n o n - o c c u r r e n c e o f a c e g a t l v e v e r b f o r m w h i c h c a n b e r e l a t e d t o t h e f u t u r e t e n s e c o n s t i t u t e s a ' g a p * i n t h e p a r a d i g m s u c h a s S c h i f f man (1974) mefitions f o r Tarail.

3, maaDal I u ) - i k k e (maaDokke i n my d i a l e c t ) i r , ( 105) is a n i n f i n i t i v e w h i c h t a k e s a d a t i v e s u f f i x , I n a n ea r l i e r s t a g e o f t h e l a n g u a g e , n c n - f i n i t e f o r ~ s of t h e v e r b were d e c l i c a b l e a s n o u n s . O n l y a few o f s u c h d e c l i n e d f o r m s h a v e s u r v i v e d i n t h e c a s e o f some n o n - f i n i t e v e r b a l f o r m s ,

4 . Pangar , (1972) s u g g e s t s t h a t t h e " n e g a t i v e morphenteii i s a a a i n v e r b , However , i n h i s a n a l y s i s n e g seems t o be a s y n t a c t i c c a t e g o r y t h a t i r c l u d e s i l l a i , e a a T T i a n d a a t u , F u r t h e r , h e d o e s n o t g i v e c lear s y c t a c t i c a r g u m e n t s t o s u p p o r t h i s claim.

5. It is o o t c l e a r w h e t h e r we n e e d a t r a n s f o r m a t i o n a l r u l e t o a c h i e v e t h i s ; a t p r e s e n t t h e r e seems t o b e n o o b j e c t i o c t o a n a n a l y s i s p c s i t i n g t h a t t h e n o n - f i n i t e main v e r b is i n i ts b a s e p o s i t i o n h e r e , when EHP-attact men t a p p l i e s , We h y p o t h o s i s o s u r f a c e s t r u c t u r e s s u c h a s tho f o l l o w i n g f o r t h e VP i n n e g a t i v e s e n t e n c e s :

,-/-% V part P I 1 I

AUX I

b a r a 1 (u) i l l a come i n f i n i t i v e n o t

' d i d n o t come '

T h e r e l e v a n t tense c a n b e r e c c v e r e d f rom t h e c o n - f i n i t e v e r b a l f o r 5 by aI! i n t e r p r e t i v e s s m a n t i c r u l e ,

Page 107: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

CHAPTFI! V

ON THE SEMABTICS O F N E G A T I O N IN K A M N A D A

5.0 If we c o m p a r e s e n t e n c e s ( 1 1 2 a ) a n d (112b) be low,

i r . t u i t i v c l y , w h i l e ( 1 1 2 a ) is a n i n s t a n c e cf s e n t e n c e n e g a t i o c ,

(112b) is a n i n s t a n c e o f f o c u s s e d ~ s g a t i o c :

1 1 2 a . a v a n u oLLeyavanu a l l a . h e g o o d man n o t

H e is n o t a g o o d man.

1 1 2 b . a v a n u a l l a o l L e y a v a n u . h e n o t g o o d man

It's n o t h e who is a good man.

I n ( 1 1 2 h ) t h e NP i fvanu is u n d e r s t o c d a s b e i n g f o c u s s e d , a n d

t h e n e g a t i o n a p p l i e s o n l y t o t h i s NP. F o c u s c a n n c t now he

p l a c e d or a n NP t o t h e r i g h t o f a11a :

1 l 2 c . Xavanu a l l a oLLeyavan (u) -uu. h e n o t g o o d man e v e n

# ~ t ' s c o t he who i s e v e n a g o o d man.

I t i s ~ v i d e n t t h a t ( 1 1 2 ~ ) is d e v i a c t b e c a u s e focus c a n n o t o c c u r

twice ir a s e n t e n c e , s i n c e focus r e p r e s e n t s new, * r o m a r k a b l e 8

i n f o r m a t i o n . However , t h e g rammar n e e d s t o e x p l a i n why tke

f i rs t NP is i n v a r i a b l y u n d e r s t o o d a s f o c u s s e d when a l l a is i n

t h i s p c s i t i o n , a n d why f o c u s c a n n o t be p l a c e d o n a n NP t o t h e

r i g h t of a l l a . T o do s o , we w i l l make u s e o f t h e r u l e

Association w i t h F o c u s .

Page 108: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

A s s o c i a t i o n w i t h F o c u s is a ruls o f s e m a n t i c

i n t e r p r e t a t i o n prnpclsed b y J a c k ~ r i d o f f (19?2) f o r 1 9 v a n c , 'orily ' , 1

I j u s t 1 a n d w, i n E n g l i s h , This r u l e o p e r a t s u n d e r p a r t i c u l a r

s t r u c t u r a l c o n d i t i o n s t o a s s c c i a t e t h e r e a d i c g o f c e r t a i n

lexiczl items with f o c u s , T h u s , " t h e a s s ~ c i a t i c n o f ~ e v e r i 9 w i t : ,

a c o c s t i t u e n t i m p l i e s t h a t t h e r e 1s s o ~ e t h i c g s p e c i a l , u n u s u a l

o r u n e x p e c t e d a b o u t t h e c c n n e c t i c n o f t h a t c c n s t i t u ~ n t w i t h

t h e e v e n t w ( J a c k e n d o f f , o p . c i t . , p .249) . To s p e c i f y t h o

s t r u c t u r a l c o n d i t i o n s u r d r r w h i c h t h i s r u l e c p e r a t e s , J a c k e n d o f f

u t i l i s e s t h e n o t i o n of rapge. " C e r t a i n l e x i c a l items, among

them e v e n , w i l l d e f i n e a r a n g e , t h a t I s , a s e t of c o d e s i n t h e

s u r f a c e s t r u c t u r e b e a r i c y a p a r t i c u l a r s t r u c t u r a l r e l a + i o n s h i p

t o t h o l e x i c a l item, where t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p is defined by

t h e l e x i c a l item i t s e l f w ( o p , c i t . , p . 2 4 9 ) , For t h e E n g l i s h n a t ,

f c r f x a m p l c , J a c k e n d o f f d ~ f i c e s a r a n g e i d e n t i c a l t o t h a t o f

e v e n , a s s o c i a t i o n w i t h f o c u s b e i n g o p t i o n a l f o r c e g a t i o c :

*'If e v e n is d i r e c t l y d o r e i n a t e d by a n o d e X, X a n d a l l

t h e n o d e s d o m i n a t e d by X a re i n t h e r a n g e o f ever , ." ( loc ,c i t . )

I n t h o s t a t e m e n t of t h e r a n g e o f a l e x i c a l item, i t i s p o s s i b l e

t o make a d i r e c t i o n a l s p ~ c i f i c a t i o r . T h u s J a c k e n d o f f ' s

s p e c i f i c a t i o n of t h e r a r g e o f o n l y a n d j u s t i n c o r p o r a t e s t h e

s t i p u l a t i o n that o n l y t h e n o d e s t o t h e r i g h t of t h e s e l e x i c a l

Items a r e w i t h i n i ts r a n g e . It is a l s o p o s s i b l e t o make t h e

r u l e o f A s s o c i a t i o n with Focus e i t h e r o p t i o n a l o r o b l i g a t o r y .

Page 109: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

I f t h e r u l e is o b l i g a t o r y fer a p a r t i c u l a r l e x i c a l item,

a n d t h r - fcjci~s i n a s c n t e n c o h a s beer- p l a c e d c u t s i d ~ t h e r a n g e

defir.crd f o r t h a t i tem, t h ~ r u l e w i l l not De a b l e t o apply ,

and t h e f a i l u r e t o apply of an o b l i g a t o r y r u l e will gene ra t e

2 ar* ucacceptaS1s readicg.

Let us s t a t e t h e m c g e of a l l a a s f o l l ~ w s , a rd

l e t u s a l s o make a s s o c i a t i o n w i t h f o c u s o b l i g a t o r y f o r a- :

Fanqo of a l l a .

I f t h e nod& under w h i c h a l l a i s g2cs r a t ed i s d i r e c t l y

dominated by a node X , X ar?d a11 t h e codes dominated by X

t o t h e l e f t of a l l a a r e i n t h e r ange of a l l a .

Th5s w i l l € c a b l e u s t o f i l t e r ou t t h e s s m a n t i c a l l y d2v ian t

s en t ences . when a l f a o c c u r s a s t h e r i g h t m c s t element i n t h e

sFn+eccP, t h e whole s e c t e a c e , o r acy NP w i t h i n t h e sen tence ,

car. b a v e f c c u s p laced on i t , and t h u s t h e ERP -m ( f o r which

a s s o c i a t i o n w i t h f o c u s is o b l i g a t o r y ) can occur freely:

NP NP AUX 4--- a l l a range c f a l l a

112d. avaa ju) -uu oLLeyavanu a l l a . he even good an n o t

Even h e i s no t a goad man,

Page 110: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

1 1 2 e . a v a c u o L L e y a v a c ( u ) - u u a l l a . he good max ever c c t

H e i s n o t e v e r a good man.

Wher! a 1 1 a o c c u r s b e t w e e n t h e two WP's, o n l y t h e NP t o i ts

l e f t is w i t h i n its r a n g e , acd f o c u s c a n c o t be p l a c e d o n a n

NP t o its r i g h t w i t h o u t i c d u c i ~ g a d e v i a n t r e a d i n g . Hence t h e

u n a c c e p t a b i l i t y o f (1 1 2 c ) .

A few o b s e r v z t i o n s n e e d t o be made a b o u t c lef t

s e n t e n c e s . C l e f t s e n t e n c e s i n Kannada h a v e tte s t r u c t u r e

11 3 a . [ n a a n u haNa-vannu t e k k o N D a d d u ] [ a v a n - i n d a ] NP NP

I money acc. t h e t a k i n g - i t h e f r o m

It was frcm him t h a t I t o o k t h e money.

Sicc? w o r d crder i n Kacnada is f a i r l y f r e ~ , we may a l s o have

1 l 3 b . [ a v a n - i n d a [ n a a n u haNa-vannu t e k k c N D a d d u ] NP WP

Ic c l e f t s e n t e n c e s , s i rce f o c u s h a s been p l a c e d on a p a r t i c u l a r

c o n s t i t u e n t , this c c n s t i t u e n t h a s a l w a y s t o be w i t h i n t h e r a n g e

of a l l a , t o g i v e a s e m a n t i c a l l y a c c e p t a b l e r e a d i c g . T h u s

11%. # [ n a a n u haNa-vannu t e k k o N D a d d u ] [ a l l a ] [ a v a n - i n d a ] NP A U X NP

i s d e v i a n t . On the s u r f a c e , a l l a a l w a y s a p p e a r s i n j u x t a -

p o s i t i o n w i t h the f o c u s s e d NP t o i t s immediate r i g h t , h o w e v e r

Page 111: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

' s c r a m b l e d * t h e word order may be:

11 3 d . n a a n u a v a n - i n d a a l l a haNa-vannu t ekkoNDaddu .

1 1 3 e . n a a n u haNa-vancu a v a n - i r d a a l l a t ekkoNDaddu .

Siccc s e a a c t i c i n t s r p r ~ t z t i o r , t a k e s p l a c e a t t h e s u r f a c c

s t r u c t u r e a n d t h e * s c r a m b f i a g t r u l e s o p e r a t e l a t e r , t h e nes

a l l 5 I n s e n t e n c e s ( 1 1 3 d , e ) is c c r r e c t l y i ~ t e r p r e t e d a s

a p p l y i r g t o t h e f o c u s s e d c o n s t i t u e n t a v a n - i n d 8 .

5.1 It has b e e n n o t e d (e.g. , S p e n c e r , 1914:69-70) t h a t

i n t h e n e g a t i o n o f a Kannada s e n t e n c e w h i c h is i n t e r p r e t e d a s

i n v o l v i ~ g c o n j u n c t i o n , a n d w h i c h h a s a s t r u c t u r e w i t h o c l y ore

f i n i t e v e r b ( t h e o t h e r v e r b s b e i n g p a r t i c i p l e s ) , t h e n e g a t i o c Bay

a p p l y t o e i t h r r * c c ~ j u c c t ' , o r t c b o t h t h e ' c o n j u n c t s ' . T h u s i n

114. a v a n u uuTa maaDi s c h o o l - i g e h o o g a l (u) - i l l a . h e meals d o p s t . p a r t s c h o o l d a t . g o i n f . n o t

He d i d n t t g o t o s c h o o l a f t e r e a t i c g .

t h e n e g a t i o n may a p p l y t o t h e f i r s t e v e n t , m?aning ' h e went

t o s c h c o l w i t h o u t e a t i c g ' , o r i t may a p p l y t o the s e c o n d e v e c t ,

m s a n i ~ g ' h e a t e , h u t d i d ~ * t gc +Q school^, or i t may a p p l y to

the w h o l e s e ~ t e n c e , y i e l d i n g a n i n t e r p r e t a t i o n l i k e ' I t is n o t

t h e case t h a t he went t o s c h o o l a f t e r e a t i n g 1 . Which of t h e s e

i n t e r p r e t a t i o n s i s n a t u r a l b e l o n g s t o t h e d o m a i n o f p r a g m a t i c s .

Page 112: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

Tk>us t h e t h i r d i n t e r p r e t a t i o ~ is c l e a r l y f a v o u r e d i n :

11 5. ( a v a c u baDavanu a l l a d e o n d u s o o m a a r i ; ) h e p o o r man a l s o a l a z y mafi

a v a n u k e l a s a maaDi haNa-vannu s a m p a a d i s u v u d (u) -ills. he work d o p s t . p a r t morey a c c . n a r n n o t

(He is riot o n l y p o o r b u t l a z y ; ) h e d o e s n ' t : work a n d e a r r . morey .

Here t h e negation a p p l i e s to t h o w h o l e s e n t e c c e :

n G g 1 h e w o r k s a n d e a r n s mor.ey 1

As f a r a s s e m a n t i c l n t e r p r e t a t i o n is c o c c e r n e d , we ~ e e d

t o be a b l e t c s t a t e t h a t t h e n e g a t i o n c a n a p p l y t o e i t h e r t h e

p a r t i c i p i a l c l a u s e o r t h e main c l a u s e , o r t o b o t h ; i.e., t h a t

thf whol f s e n t e n c e is w i t h i n t h e r a n g e of i l l a , wh ich may t h e n

a s s c c f a t e w i t h a c y f o c u s s e d c o c s t i t u ~ a t , a n d t h ~ n e g a t i o n w i l l

a p p l y o ~ l y t o t h a t c o c s t i t u ~ c t . I n t h i s way a v e r b wh ich

a p p e a r s t o b e * n e g a t i v e s may b e i n t e r p r e t e d a s a n a f f i r m a t i v ~ ,

i f F l l a h a s been a s s o c i a t ~ d w i t h some o t h e r f o c u s s e d c o n s t i t u e n t .

N a d k a r n i (1970:220) p r o p o s e s a s t r u c t u r e a s f c l l o w s

f o r t h e s e s e r t e n c e s :

NP V P

I 7\

l o c v 1

a v a r u a v a r u uuTa maaDi I

s c h c o l i g e 1

hcog-

Page 113: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

Re w i l l Iict g c i c t o the q u e s t i o n of w h e t h ~ r this a ~ a l y s i s is

a c c e p t a b l e i n its details, h u t I t seems tc u s t h a t its essect ial .

i n s i g h t , t h a t t h e s e sectecces h a v e a s u b o r d i ~ a t e r a t h ~ r t h a n

a c c - c r d i n a t ~ s t r u c t u r e ,

. . ( e . q., (1:i)

a v a n u uuTa maaDi a v a n u s c h c o l i g e k - 1

i s c o r r e c t . It is a p p a r e n t t h a t a n y r u l e which b r i n g s 52 i n

(ii) a b o v e w i t h i n t h e r a n g e o f i l l a w i l l b e e a s i e r t o state

t h a ~ a r u l e which a t t e m p t s t o dc. s c f o r S 1 i c f i g u r e [iii),

a s t h e l a t t e r i n v o l v ~ s a n a d d i t i o n a l ' h i g h e r ' n c d e which must

b e b r o u g h t w i t h i n t h e r a n g e of i l l a : a node which is o u t s i d e

the S ( e n t e ~ c e ) i n which i l l a o c c u r s . Ye may now s t a t e t h e

range of i l l a a s f o l l o w s :

F a c q e cf i l l a .

If t h e VP d o m i n a t i n g i l l a is d o m i n a t e d by a node S 1 a n d

d c ~ i n a t ~ s a ncde 52, S 1 and S2 a r e i n t h e r a n g e of i l l a ,

he^ t h e v e r b a l p a r t i c i p l e i n s u c h s e n t e n c e s i s

c ~ g a t i v e , a s i m i l a r a m b i g u i t y r e s u l t s . Thus i n ( l l f i ) ,

116, a v a n u uuTa maaD-adee s c h o o l - i g e h e o g a l { u ) - i l l a h e m e a l s do n e g - p a r t . s c h o o l d a t . g o i n f , n o t

H e d i d not go t o s c h o o l w i t h o u t e a t i n g .

Page 114: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

t h ~ n e g a t i o n of i l l a c a c a p p l y or11 t o t h e p a r t i c i p i a l c l a u s ~ ,

y i e l d i r g an a f t i r m 8 + i v e readicg cf t h e n e g a + i v p p a r t i c i p l e ,

a s it is a g a i n c e g a t e d : ' I t was r o t w i t h o u t e a t i n g t h a t h e

werit t c s c h o o l 9 . A clear i n s t a n c e o f t h i s k i n d o f a s s o c i a t i o ~

c f i l f a w i t h a f o c u s s e d p a r t i c i p i a l c l a u s e is t h ~ f a v o u r e d

c o n s t r u c t i o n

117. a v a n u uuTa maaD-auee s c h o o l - i g e h o o g u v u d ( u ) - i l l a . h e meals d o n e g . p a r t . s c h o o l d a t . g o p a r t . n e t

H e d o e s n o t g o t o s c h o o l w i t h o u t e a t i n g .

S E n t e r , c e (117) p a r a p h r a s e s a s 'It is a l w a y s h i s p r a c t i c e t o

h a v e l u n c h b e f o r e h e g o e s t o s c h o o l * , i .e. t h e n e g a t i o n a p p l i e s

o c l y tc t h e p a r t i c i p i a l c l a u s e , a n d denies t h a t h e e v e r g o e s

t o s c h o o l w i t h o u t h a v i n g l u n c h f i r s t .

I f the n e g a t i o c i c f l l a a p p l i ~ s o ~ l y tc t h o wain

c l a u s e , t h e r e a d i n g of (116) a b o v e would be *he d i d n ' t e a t ,

a n d he d i d n ' t g o t o s c h o o l g . A g a i n , t h i s reading a p p e a r s

x i a t u r a l i f there is a n i m p l i e d o r o v e r t c a u s a l r e l a t i o n s h i p

b e t w e o n t h e t w o e v F ~ t s . F o r e x a m p l e :

118, a v a n u o o d - a d e e p a a s a a g a l ( u ) - i l l a . h e r e a d ~ e g . p a r t . p a s s h a p p e n i n f o n u t

He d i d not p a s s ( t h e e x a m i n a t i o n ) , d u e t c n o t s t u d y i t g .

Page 115: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

T h e ~ e g a t i o n i n i l l a c a r a l s o a p p i y t o t h e whole s e n t e n c e ,

g i v i c g the r e a d i ~ g ' I t i s not t h ~ c a s e t h a t hp went t n s c h z ~ :

w i t h o u t e a t i n g Q . N o t e t h a t on t h i s r e a d i n g o c l y t h e who le

p r o p c s i t i o n i s n e g a t e d , a n d t h e n e g a t i v e p a r t i c i p l e is not

i n t n r ~ r e t e d a s a C affirmative p a r t i c i p l e . T h i s c cc t r a s t s w i t 5

t h e c a s e where t h e n o g a t i o n is a s s o c i a t e d w i t h f o c u s o r t h e

p a r t i c i p i a l c l a u s e a r d t h e n e g a t i v ~ p a r t i c i p l e is n e g a t e d

a g a i c , H b i l e t h e c i r c u a s t a n c e s i n wh ich 'two n e g a t i v e s make

c p o s i t i v e ' a re n o t b e i n g i n v e s t i g a t e d h e r e , i t seems t h a t

i t is c o t e c c u g h f o r a n s t o be w i t h i n t h e r a n g e of a s e c o c d

r e g a t i o n , t o y i e l d a n a f f i r e e t i v e r e a d i n g ?

5 . 2 We w i l l now f x a m i n o the case which h a s l e d t h e

c o n j u n c t i o n h o r a t u t o be r e g a r d e d a s ' n e g a t i v e ' , i n some s e n s e .

It t r a c s l a t e s a s ' e x c e p t , u n l e s s ' , o r ' b u t f o r t $ S p e n c e r

(1914: 1 Y 1 ) g i v e s t h e e x a m p l e s

11 9a. n i i v u b a n d a h o r a t u n a n a g e s a n t o o ~ ~ a v i r u v u d i l l a . you come p a r t . h u t - f o r t o at2 h a p p i n e s s be n e g

1 s h a l l n o t be h a p p y u n l e s s y o u come.

1 lgb, n i i v u b a a r a d a h o r a t u n a x a g e s a n t o o S R a v i r u v u d i l l a . you n o t - c o m i c g b u t - f c r t o me h a p p i n e s s b e neg .

I s h a l l n o t b e h a p p y u n l e s s y o u come.

Page 116: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

T ~ E p r o b l ~ m h e n o t a s i s t h a t , a l t h o u y h ( 1 1 9 a ) a c d ( 1 1 9 b ) a r e

p a r a p h r a s e s , t h e ( a ) sentenv contains a n a f f i r m a t i v e

p a r t i c i p l e a n d t h e (b ) s e L t e n c o a n e g a t i v e p a r t i c i p l e . H e

c o m m e n t s ( o p , c i t . , p . 1 4 1 )

"It i s diff i c n f t s a t i s f a c t c r i l y t c e x p l a i c a c o n s t r u c t i o n i n w h i c h a n e g a t i v e p a r t i c i p l e g i v e s t h e s a m e s e n s e a s t h e c c r r e s p o a d i n g a f f i r m a t i v e p a r t i c i p l e . H u n s h i s ( n a t i v e s c h o l a r s , R A ) a p p e a r t o r e g a r d h o r a t u a s a n o u a t i v e word, a n d s a y t h a t the a d d i t i o n o f t h e n o g a + i v e p a r t i c i p l e g i v e s o a p h a s i s to i ts n e g a t i v s f c r c e , a n d d o f s n o t c o u n t e r a c t i t . B u t a s a r u l e i n K a n a r e s e t h e p r i n c i p l e h o l d s t h a t t w c n e g a t i v e s a re e q u i v a l e n t t o a n a f f i r ~ a t i v e . T h e s e n t e n c e may be r e g a r d e d a s m e a n i n g ' beyond t h e f a c t o f y o u r n o t h a v i n g come t h e r e is n o t t h e f a c t t h a t I have j o y g . "

Although a c o n s t r u c t i o n l i k e (119b) I s v e r y ra re i n t h e

l a r g u a g e t o d a y , ( 1 1 9 a ) b e i n g much more common, t h e p r o c e s s of

a s s o c i a t i o n w i t h f o c u s t h a t i l l a u n d e r g o e s is a b l e t o e x p l a i r ,

tfrs f o r m e r c o n s t r u c t i o n . Let u s f o r the moment r e g a r d h o r a t u

a s a c o n j u n c t i o n s e m a n t i c a l l y u n s p e c i f i e d f o r n e g a t i v i t y o r

on-negativity, H e w i l l j u s t i f y t h i s s t a n d b e l o w . Now i f i n

(119b) t h e c l a u s e w i t h t h e n e g a t i v e p a r t i c i p l e i s f o c u s s e d

a n d i l l a is a s s o c i a t e d w i t h i t , t h e p a r t i c i p l e i s a g a i n

negated b y i l l a ar.d is t h e r e f o r e i r t e r p r e t e d a s a f f i r ~ s a t i v ? ;

a n d t h e v e r b a l 'be h a p p y ' i s a l s c i n t e r p r e t e d a s a f f i r m a t i v e ,

a s t h e n e g a t i o n of i l l a n o l o n g e r a p p l i e s t o it.

F o r i n s t a n c e , t h e s e n t e n c e

120. n i i v u b a r - a d e e n a n a g e s a n t o o S H a v i r u v u d i l l a . you come n e g . p a r t . t o me h a p p i r e s s be n o t

K i t h o u t y o u r c o m i n g , I s h a l l n o t b e h a p p y .

Page 117: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

may b~ i 2 t ~ r p r e t e d a s 'If i t i s not t h e c a s e t h a t you d o n o t

com~, 1 shall b e h a p p y ' . S i m i l a r l y , while (1192) i s i n t e r p r e t e d

a s ' B u t f c r y o u r c o m i n g , I s h a l l n o t b e h a p p y ' , (119b) is

i n t e r p r e t e d a s ' B u t f c r i t s co t b e i n g t h e case t h a t you do n o t

ccae, I s h a l l 5 e h a p p y * .

Let u s row e x a m i r e i n wha t s e n s e W h a s t h e same

s t a ? u s a s ' b u t * , i n E n g l i s h . S p e r . c ~ r ( o p . c i t . , p . 1 4 2 ) s t a t e s ,

"111 a d d i t i o n t o t h e a b o v e u s e of h o r a t u ( i . e . t h e u s e i n ( l l g a , b ) . R A ) . . . , a s ~ c o n d m u s t be n o t i c e e : n a m e l y , i ts u s e f o l l o w i n g a f u l l y c o n j u g a t e d v e r b o r a n e u t e r p a r t i c i p i a l noun, e i t h e r of w h i c h m u s t h a v e t h e e m p h a t i c a f f i x oe. The m e a n i r g cf h c r a t u . . . i n t h i s c o n s t r u c t i c n is *in a d d i t i o n t o , b e s i d e s ' , a n d i t is a l w a y s f o l l o w e d by a n e g a t i v e p r i n c i p a l v e r b , c r a n i n t e r r o g a t i v e which i s e q u i v a l e n t i n ~ e a n i n g t o a n e g a t i v e . "

E a r l i e r f o p . c i t . ,p . 119) h e s t a t e s :

". . , i f ' i n a d d i t i o n t o ' o r ' b e s i d e s t i s c c n n e c t e d v i t h a p o s i t i v e v e r b , h o r a t u m u s t n o t b e e m p l o y e d ; a l l a d e e m u s t b e u s e d . "

S p e n c e r h a s c a r e f u l l y made t h e c a v e a t t h a t h o r a t u may be

f c l l o w e d b y a * n e g a t i v e p r i n c i p a l v e r b 8 , o r by a c ' i n t e r r o g a t i v e

wh ich i s e q u i v a l e n t i n m e a n i n g t c a c e g a t i v e * . T h i s l o a d s o n e

t o s u s p ~ c t t h a t t h e a p p e a r a n c e of a n e g a t i v e v e r b v i t h h o r a t u

is r o t a s y n t a c t i c p h e n o n e c o n .

On a s u p e r f i c i a l e x a r n i c a t i o n , i t a p p e a r s t h a t b o r a t u

always a p p e a r s whec t w o s e n t e x e s t h a t d i f f e r w i t h r e s p e c t t o

r e g a t i v i t y a r e con j c i n e d , t h a t is, t h e f o l l o w i n g c o r n b i ~ a t i o n s

Page 118: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

5 cf ssr4tgcces spem to occur w i t h F o r a t u a n d a l l a d e e :

1st c o ~ j c i n t 2 n d c o n j c i n t c c n j u n c t i o n

a f f i r m a t i v e c e g a t i v e n ~ g a t i v r , a f f i r m a t i v e

r - f g a t i v e h o r a t u a f f i r ~ a t i v e h o r a t u n e g a t i v e a l l a d e e a f f i r m a t i v e a l l a d e f

Be may cite t h e f o l l c w i c g sertecces a s i l l u s t r a t i v e of t h i s

t a b l e :

121, a v a n u s i g a r e t s o e d u t t a a r , (e) -ee h o r a t u k uDiyuvud (u) - i l l a . h e s m o k e s CONJ d o e s n o t d r i n k .

He smokes, b u t h e d o e s nct d r i n k .

122. a v a n u s i g a r ~ t s e e d u v u d i l l a ; aSHTee h c r a t u k u D i y u t t a a n e . h e n o t smoke C O N J d r i n k s

A l t h o u g h h e d o e s c o t smoke, h e d r i n k s .

123. a v a c u s i g a r e t s e e d u v u d a l l a d e e k u D i y u t t a a n e . h e smoke CONJ d r i n k s

He c c t o n l y s a o k e s , b u t d r i n k s .

1 2 4 . a v a c u s i g a r e t s e e d u v u d i l l a ; a s h T e e a l l adee kuDiyuvuduu -ills.

h e n o t smoke C O N J n o t d r i n k

H e c e i t h e r d r i a k s n c r smokes .

T h e s e s e n t e n c e s n e a t l y i f l u s t r a t e c u r p a r a d i g m . However , we

a l s o h a v ~ t o a c c o u n t f o r the f o l l o u i o g s e n t e n c s :

125, a v a n u n a n n a n n u h o D e d a d d - a l l a d e e k a a s u u k o D a l i l l a , h e I acc. b e a t i n g C O M J mcney-even g i v e n o t

He r a o t o n l y h e a t me, b u t h~ d i d n o t g i v e me t h e money, e i t h e r .

Page 119: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

It i s c k v i o u s t h a t t h i s s t r - t onc r has ac a f f i r m a t i v e a n d a

c e g a t i v e s e c t e n c e c n n j c i n ~ d . H o v c v ~ r , i n s t e a d ~f the e x p e c t f d

h o r a t u , a l l a d e e a p p e a r s . The o c c u r r e n c e o f t h e s e c o n j u n c t i o n s

seems t o b e c o n d i t i o n e d p u r e l y b y p r a g m a t i c p r e s u p p o s i t i o n s ;

thus i n (125) t h e p r s s n p p c s i t i o c i s t h a t the a c t s of b ~ a t i c g

a n d w i t h h c l d i c g t h e money are b o t h bad . H o r a t u t h e r e f o r e b e h a v e s

just l i k e ' b u t t i n F n g l i s h , w h i c h i s n o t l o g i c a l l y d i f f e r e ~ t

• ’ row ' a n d ' , Its u s e is d e t e r r n i n ~ d by p r a g i a a t i c p r e s u p p o s i t i o n s ,

a c d its o n l y claim t o n e g a t i v i t y i s t h a t i t o c c u r s when

a p r e s u p p o s i t i o n i s u p s e t .

Page 120: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

Notes.

1. Cf. J a c k e n d o f f ( l 97> :2SO) ,

2. T h i s i s t h e d e v i c e ky w h i c h a c c e p t a b l e p l a c e m e n t o f e x n i n s u r f a c e s t r u c t u r e is a c h i e v e d , w i t h o u t s y c t a c t i c a l l y r e s t r i c t i n g i ts o c c u r r e n c e s ir t h e s e n t e n c e ( c f . J a c k e n d o f f , op . c i t . , pp. 248-50) .

Labov (7972:130-196), i n a n e x a m i n a t i o n o f t b e b l a c k F n g l i s h v e r ~ a c u l a r ( E E V ) , d i s c u s s e s t h e phenomenon o f ' N e g a t i v a C o c c c r d t . T h i s r u l e i s a n e x t ~ n s i o n cf K l ima t s r u l e o f Meg- I n c o r p o r a t i o n ( ' N e g - A t t r a c t i o n ', i n L a b o v ' s t e r m s ) i n t o i n d e f i n i t e s : f o r some d i a l ~ c t s o t E n g l i s h , " i n s t e a d o f s a y i n g t h a t t h e n e g a t i v e i s a t t r a c t e d t o t h e f i r s t i cde te rmi ra te , w e m i g h t s a y . . . t h a t t h e n e g a t i v e i s a t t r a c t e d t o i n d e t e r m i n a t e s g e n ~ r a l l y " (op. c i t . ,p . 1 4 5 ) . L a b c v c i t e s e x a m p l e s l i k e (1-3) b e l o w , w h e r e t h e (a) a n d (b) s e n t e n c e s r e p r e s e n t t h e s t a n d a r d d i a l e c t , a n d t h e (c) s e n t e n c e s a r e t h e i r n o c - s t a n d a r d e q u i v a l e n t s :

l a . I d i d n ' t f i n d a p r o o f cf t h ~ t h e o r e m i c a n y o f t h e s e t e x t s .

1 h . 1 f o u n d a proof o f t h e t h e o r e m i n n o n e o f t h e s e t e x t s .

I c . f d i d r , @ t f i n d a p r o o f cf t h e t h e o r e i s ifi n o n e o f t h e s e t e x t s .

2a, T h a t i s n ' t a c y t h i c g new. 2k. T k a t l s n c t h i ~ g new, 2c . T h a t a i n ' t n o t h i n g new,

3a, I d i d n ' t t e l l J o h n to F a i n t a n y o f t h e s e . 3h. I t c l d J o h n t o p a i n t n o n e o f t h e s e . 3c . I d i d n v t t e l l J o h n t o p a i r , t n o n e of t h e s e .

H e c o a m o n t s , t t T o a c h e r s a n d o t h e r o p p o n e r , t s of n o n - s t a n d a r d d i a l e c t s may argue t h a t t h e s e s e n t e n c e s ( i . e , t h e (c) e x a m p l e s , R A ) r e v e r s e t h ~ m e a n i n g . . . (o f t h e (a) a n d ( b ) e x a m p l e s , R A ) . P u t t h i s F s mere r h e t o r i c ; f o r a n y s p e a k e r o f E n g l i s h , n o matter how r e f i n e d , i s f a m i l i a r w i t h t h o e x i s - t e n c e o f n e g a t i v e c o n c o r d a n d r aa l i se s t h a t ( t h e ( c ) s e n t e n - ces) i n t e n d t h e same m e a n i n g a s ( t h e (a ) a n d (b) s e n t e n c e s ) , W h e n a n u n d e r l y i n g d o u b l e c e g a t i v o is i n t e n d e d , s p e a k e r s o f n o n - s t a n d a r d ~ n g l i s h u s e t h e same d e v i c e a s s p e a k e r s of s t a n d a r d E n g l i s h : h e a v y stress o n b o t h n e g a t i v e s t v ( o p . c i t . , p . 1 4 6 ) . T h a t is, m u l t i p l e n e g a t i o n d o ~ s n o t i m p l y t h a t t h e n e g a t i v e s ' c a n c e l * ~ a c h o t h e r o u t : t h e c a n c e l l i n g o c c u r s u n d e r s p e c i f i c c o n d i t i o n s o f f o c u s .

Page 121: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

4. C f , S p e n c e r (1914: 118) : "Horatu is a neuter Roun derived from hora, t h e cutsid~, It Deans ' t h a t which i s outside', and b e n c e Ithat w h i c h is additional1 o r 'thet w h i c h i s e x c e p t e d ' ,

5 . Thus even on a s u p ~ r f i c i a f examination, it is not true that hcratu is followed by a riegative p r i n c i p a l v e r b or a n i n t e r r o g a t i v e t h a t is e q u i v a l e ~ t i n meanicg to a n e g a t i v e .

Page 122: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

6 .0 W - 3 h a v e a t t e m p t e d i n t h i s t h e s i s t o g i v e a

f g r m a l c h a r a c t e r i s a t i o n o f i n Kannada , a n d h a v e n o t &

t h e p e c u l i a r i t i e s o f d i s t r i b u t i o n o f t h s v a r i o u s n e g a t i v e s ,

W+ h a v e showr, t h a t n s i t h s r a l l a nor i l l a c a n a p p e a r i n

n o n - t e n s e d s e n t e n c e s . We s o u g h t t o f o r ~ a l i s e t h e s e f a c t s by

t r e a t i n g t h e s e i t e m s a s c o n s t i t u e n t s o f A U X , a s t h e r e e x i s t s

a r e s t r i c t i o n o n t h e 3 p p e a r a n c s of A U X i n n o n - t e n s e d s e n t e n c e s ,

H-1 h a v e a l s o commented o n t h e n e a d f o r a p a s i t i c n f o r a non-

f i n i t e v e r b i n t h e VP. I t i s t h i s p o s i t i o n t h a t is f i l l e d b y

t h e n e g a t i v e v e r b a l p a r t i c i p l e w h i c h o c c u r s b o t h i n t e n s e d a n d

n ~ n - t z n s e d s s n t e n c e s , a n d b y t h e n o n - f i n i t e f o r a s o f t h e aain

v q r b t h a t o c c u r when i l l a is p r e s e n t i n t h e s e n t e n c e . He

t h k r z f o r 3 p r a p o s e d t h z f o l l o w i n g r u l e s f o r t h e b a s e :

S - -> { NP NP AUX ) ( NP VP 1

VP --> V p a r t , VP i ii

VP --> V A U X ii

A U X --> ( A s p e c t ) { T e n s e PNG f f ?lodal 1 C a l l a f f i l l a 1

Page 123: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

we p o i n t s d o u t t h a t a l l a w o u l d h a v 2 t o b e s u b c a t e g o r i s e d t o

a p p e l r i f i l t h e c ~ ) ~ t e x t [I?? - 1, ar.d T e n s e PHC; r a s t r i c t a d t o t h e

c m t s x t [ V - 1. T h e nfq i l l a w i l l h a v e t o ba s u b c a t e g o r i s e d t o

a p p e a r i n t h e c o n t e x t s [ V - j a n d [ Loc -1, iJe a l s o h y p o t h e s i s e d

t h a t a r u l e a f V s r b - R a i s i n g v o u l 5 a o v f A s p s c t a n d a t t a c h i t a s

a J a u g h t o r t o VP, a n d t h a t a r u l a o f I r u - S u p p o r t a p p l i e s i n

t h s [NP N P A U X ] s e n t 2 n c e s . T o a c c o u n t f o r the s e a a n t i c s cf S

n e g a t i o n , we made us* o f t h e r u l e o f s e a a n t i c i n t e r p r e t a t i o n

A s s o c i a t i o n w i t h F o c u s , a n d s t a t e d t h e r a n g e s of a l l a a n d i l l a

a s fal lows:

Hanqe of s l l a .

I f t h e node u n d e r w h i c h a l l a is g s n e r a t e d is d i r e c t l y

d o r n i n l t e d hp a n o d + X , X a n d a l l t h e n o d t s d o m i n a t e d by

X t o t h e left of a l i a a r e i n t h e r a n q e 3 f a l l a .

fang* of i l l a .

I f t h e VP d o m i n a t i n g i l l a i s d o m i n a t e d b y a n o d e S t a n d

d o m i n a t e s a node S2, S 1 a n d 52 a r e i n t h e r a n g e o f i l l a .

I n t h 3 a b s e n c e o f s y s t o ~ a t i c ~ x p l o r a t i o n o f

l a r g d r a r e a s o f Kannzda s y n t a x , much o f wha t h a s b e e n s a i d

i n t h i s t h e s i s h a s b e e n t e n t a t i v i l a n d e x p l o r a t o r y . T h e s t u d y

Page 124: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

of t h + sy1; tax ~f t h e n a g d t i v r ~ o r m s o f a l d n g u a g a c a n n o t be

i s o l a t e d from t h e l a r g e r i s s u e s of t h e s y c t z x o f the V e r b

P h r a s e a n d the S e n t e n c e . I t seems t o u s t h a t t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n

of t h s n e g a t i v e s a11a a n d i l l a i s s y m p t o m a t i c of a l a r g e r

? i s t i n c t i o r , between t u o b a s i c typis o f sentences i n Kannada:

v e r b l e s s c o p u l a t i v e s e n t e n c e s , a n d s e n t e n c e s w i t h v e r b s . Ye

h a v e s h o u n t h a t these two k i n d s o f s e n t e o c e s b e h a v e v e r y

d i f f e r e n t l y w i t h r e s p ~ c t t o t r a n s f o r m a t i o n s l i k e ~ q u i - N P d e l e t i o n

a n d R a i s i n g , a n d t o t h e k i n d s o f a d v e r b s t b s y p e r m i t . T h e s e

f a c t s must be k e p t i n nind when s t u d y i n g o the r d i a l e c t s of

Kannada i n w h i c h t h e v e r b l e s s c o p u l a t i v e s a n t e n c e s seem t o b e

only o p t i o n a l l y v e r b l e s s . T h e s t a t u s of t h a v e r b w h i c h appears

I n t h z s e c o n s t r u c t i o n s i n such d i a l e c t s n e e d s t o bt i n v e s t i g a t e d

ir d s p t h . Us h a v e s e e n t h a t i n t h e d i a l e c t u n d e r c o n s i d 2 r a t i o n f

t h e v e r b w h i c h d o e s s u r f a c e when t h e r e is a moda l i n t h e

s e n t e n c s , a p p e a r s t o be a dummy.

A p r e r e q u i s i t s f o r t h e r e s o l u t i o n of a v 3 r i o t y

of p r o b l e m s is a r e s o l u t i o n of t h e s y n t a x ~f t h e m a r k e r -AAGI.

N a d k s r n i (1970) h a s a t t e m p t e d a r e s o l u t i o n o f -AAGI; however,

h i s a n a l y s i s is a d h o c , and d a f i c i e n t i n s3me r e s p e c t s . B y

d e r i v i n g non-AAZI c o p u l a t i v e s from t h o - A B G I c o p u l a t i v e s w i t h

3n o t h a r w i s e u n m o t i v a t e d r u l s o f -AAGI d e l e t i o n , h e f a i l s t o

Page 125: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

t a k e i n t o a c c o u n t t h - l a r g e r d i f f e r e n c e s i n t h e s y n t a c t i c

b ~ h a v i o o r o f t h + - A A G I rlrid the RCZ-AAGI { v s r b l e s s ) c o p u l a t i v e s ,

F u r t h e r , h e d o e s n o t c o n s i d e r s e n t e n c e s i n w h i c h -AAGT may b e

f o l l o w e d by v e r b s o t h e r t h a n iru ' t o be', H i s a n a l y s i s o f

s l l a is c o c s c q u s r t l y o f v e r y l i m i t e d v a l u e ; b y p o s t u l a t i r g t h a t

a l l a i s t h e n e g a t i v e o f t h e ' s t a t i v e v e r b g a a g u , h e is l e f t

w i t h the p r o b l e m o f e x p l a i n i n g why a l l a c a n n o t a p p e a r whec

- A A G I is f o l l o w e d b y a n y v e r b o t h e r t h a n iru . H i s a n a l y s i s

c a n n o t be a c c e p t e d , u n l e s s s e n t e n c e s i n h i s d i a l e c t o f Kannada

(we mus t k e e p i n mind t h a t l a d k a r n i is a b i l i n g u a l i n K o n k a n i ,

a3 I n d o - A r y a n l s n g u a q a w h i c h d o e s n o t a1 low v a r b l e s s s e n t e n c e s )

a r - shown t o b e r a d i c a l l y d i f f e r e n t i n t h e i r s y n t a c t i c

b s h a v i o u r f r o m s e n t e n c e s i n t h e d i a l e c t o f Kannada u n d e r

c o n s l a t r a t i o n h e r e . T h i s p r o b a b i l i t y seems remote, a s e v e n

t h e o t h e r D r a v i d i a n ( l i t e r a r y ) l a n g u a g e s shcw p a t t e r n s o f

s y n t a c t i c b e h a v i o u r s i m i l a r t o t h a t o f Kannada , S a l a y a l a m ,

f o r e x a m p l e , w h e r e a c o p u l a d o e s a p p e a r on t h e s u r f a c e ,

a l i o w s ~ a i s i n g o n l y o u t of c o p u l a t i v e s e n t s n c a s , a n d a l l a i s t h e

n o g a t i v s w h i c h a p p e a r s i n s u c h s e n t e n c e s . T h e a p p e a r a n c e o f

t h e - A A G I m a r k e r seems t o b e a u n i f i e d phenomenon i n S o u t h

D r a v i d i a n l i t e r a r y l a n g u a g z s , a s t h e m a r k e r s -qaa [ i n T e l u g u )

a n d -= f i n ~ a m i l ) o c c u r i n t h e same c o n t e x t s . I n e v e r y case,

t h e m a r k e r is homcnymous w i t h tits p a s t p a r t i c i p l e o f a v e r b

m+an ing ' t o h a p p e n , t o b e c o w ' . I t is u n l i k e l y t h a t a d i a l e c t

o f ~ a n n a d a s h o u l d d i f f e r more r a d i c a l l y i n ' d e s p f s y n t a x t h a n do

Page 126: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

o t h e r l a n g u a g e s o f th.i Sam-. y i n e t i c , and v t c y l i k e l y t y p o l o g i c a l

f m i l y ; h o w e v + r , t h i s is a n e ~ p i r i c a l Batter. We h a v + e a r l i e r

p o i n t e d o u t t h a t a s t u d y o f -AAGI may a l s o p r o v i d e a c l u e a s t o

t h e r s l l v a n c e of t h e n o t i o n s ' t e n s e d * a n d I n o n - t e n s e d ' , f o r

I tannada .

5.1 T h e s y c t a x of t h e V e r b P h r a s a i n Kannada n e e d s

t o bs i n v e s t l g a t e d i n d e t a i l . T h e VP is c h a r a c t e r i s e d by a

p r o l i x i t y of n o n - f i n i t e f o r m s ; N a d k a r n i (1970) is o f t h o

c p i n i o n t h a t m o s t o f t h e s e n o n - f i n i t e f o r m s h a v e a s o u r c e

i n an embedded s e n t e n c e , I t n e e d s t o be d e t e r m i n e d , however ,

t o w h a t e x t a n t a n a n a l y s i s w i t h m u l t i p l e e t a b e d d i n g s c a n b e

m o t i v a t a d i n a d s s c r i p t i o n o f t h a c u r r e n t l a n g u a g e . Ve

h a v z s e e n t h a t t h e r e a r e s t r u c t u r e s w i t h a n o n - f i n i t e main

v ? r b , n o t a b l y , a c o n s t r u c t i o n w i t h a n e g a t i v e v e r b a l p a r t i c i p l e

a n d a l i m i t e d c l a s s o f ' a u x i l i a r y 8 , t e n s z - c a r r y i n g v e r b s . I n

o u r e x a m p l e s , iru ' t o be1 a p p e a r s a s o n e s u c h ' a u x i l i a r y 8

v e r b . A n o t h e r v e r b wh ich c a n a p p t a r i n s u c h c o n t e x t s is

hoogu ' t o g o ' ; t h e v e r b ' t o g o ' h e r e is s e m a n t i c a l l y e a p t y ,

much l i k e t h e s a m e v e r b i n t h e E n g l i s h c o n s t r u c t i o n s

' H e w e n t w i t h o u t f o o d f o r s e v e r a l d a y s ' , o r ' i t g o e s w i t h o u t

s a y i n g . . . I I n ~ r a v i d i a n l a n g u a g e s t h e v e r b 8 t o g o 1

Page 127: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

i i p p e 3 r s i n suct : c o n t e x t s a u c h aor; r e g u l a r l y , i n c o m b i n a t i o n

nlth a v a r i e t y ~f E O R - f i n i t e ffiain v e r b s , e. g.,

b a r - a d e e h c o d a coms n s q . p a r t . go

s a g - a d 2 e h o o p i t u h a p p e n n e g . p a r t . g o

' d i d n o t c o m e *

' d i d n o z h a p p s n l

T h a s y n t a x o f t h e s e c o n s t r u c t i o n s i s i n t i m a t e l y c o n n e c t e d

w i t h t h a t o f t h e * a s p e c t u a l c o - v e r b s t h a t a r a a r e g u l a r a n d

p u z z l i n g f s a t u r e r ,ot o c l y o f Dravidian l a n g u a g e s , b u t o f

Indo-Aryan l a n g u a g e s l i k e H i n d i , a s well, Ths s e l e c t i o n a l

r e s t r i c t i o n s on t h e s e ' a s p e c t u a l * co- v e r b s seem t o d i f f e r

a c c o r d i n g t o w h e t h e r t h e a a i n ( n o n - f i n i t e ) v e r b s are a f f i r m a t i v e

o r n o g a t i v e :

maaDi- h a a k d a d o p s t . p a r t p u t

'he f i n i s h e d t h a t b o r i n g w o r k 1

maaDf - m u g i s i d a d o p s t . p a r t . f i n i s h e d

' h e f i n i s h e d d o i n g t h e w o r k 1

# m a a D i - i d d a d o p s t . p a r t w 3 s

# ' h e d i d ' cf. maaDidda ,

'he h a d d o n e '

#maaD-adee h a a k d a do n e g . p a r t p u t

# 'he d i d n 't f i n i s h t h a t b o r i n g work @

#maaD-ades m u g i s i d a d o neg. p a r t . f i n i s h e d

X ' h 2 d i d n *t f i n i s h d o i n g t h e w o r k *

maaD-adee i d d a do n q . p a r t , was

' h e r e m a i n e d w i t h o u t d o i n g , h e n e g l e c t e d t o d o q

Page 128: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

# m a a D i - i d d u - b i f ~ a a a a D - a d e s i d d u-b iTTa do p s t . p a r t , b z p s t . p a r t d o nag. p a r t . b e p s t - p a r t

l ~ f f_ l e f t

h e remained w i t h o u t d o i n g , he n s g l z c t e d t o d o a

I n d e t e r m i n i n g t h z s a l e c t i o n a l r e s t r i c t i o n s f o r t h e s e c o - v e r b s ,

p r a g m a t i c a s p e c t s of l a n g u a g e u s e must c a r s f u l l y b e s e p a r a t e d

f rom s y n t a c t i c phenomena, T h u s , w h i l e the c o - v e r b b i D u * t o l e a v e

a p p e a r s t o be u n a c c e p t a b l e i n a n a g a t i v e s a n t e n c e , it d o e s occtlr

i n s e n t e n c e s l i k e

1 2 6 . n a a n u p a a T h a o o d a l i l l a 3ata n i i n u messhTrige I l e s s o n d i d n 8 t r d a d COMP y o u t o t e a c h e r

h e e L (i) - b i Dal ( u ) - i l l a - v a l l a ? s a y pst. p a r t , l eave in•’, n o t neg . t a g

I h o p e you didn't f o o l i s h l y a n d h a s t i l y tell the t e a c h e r t h a t I: h a d n o t r e ad my l e s s o n !

T h s r 2 s t r i c t i o n s on the a s p e c t u a l c o - v g r b s may t h u s t u r n o u t

t o b s p r a g m a t i c , s y n t a c t i c o r s e m a n t i c , d e p e n d i n g o n

p a r t i c u l a r v e r b s .

We h a v e r a i s e d raore q u e s t i o n s i n t h i s t h e s i s t h a n

u+ h a v e a n s w e r e d , o r e v e n a t t e m p t e d t o a n s w e r . @e h o p e , h o w e v e r ,

t h a t i n t h i s p r e l i a i n a r y e x a m i n a t i o n o f negation i n Kannada , we

Page 129: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

h a v s nnt;.d som- phenomena t h a t a n y s t u d y o f n e q a t i o n i n this

l m g u a q e - a n d sors so, a s t u d y of t h e s t r u c t u r e o f negation

i a S o u t h D r a v i d i a n l i t e r a r y l a n g u a g e s - B u s t t a k e i n t o a c c o u n t .

It i s i m p e r a t i v s t h a t work i n i n d i v i d u a l l a n g u a g e s towards a

s a t i s f a c t c r y r e s o l u t i o n o f t h e k i n d s o f i s s u e s w e have r a i s e d

ba u n d e r t a k s n , befors a n y g e n e r a l i s a t i o n s p e r t a i n i n g t o

D r a v i d i a n l a n g u a g e s a s a w h o l e , can b e ~ a d e .

Page 130: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

BIRLIOGRWPEY

~ g e s t h i a l i n g o m , S., a n d Shanmugarn, S.V. ( e d s . ) 1972, ~ h i r d S e m i n a r on D r a v i d i a n L i n g u i s t i c s . ~ n n a m a l a i Univ.: B n n a r n a l s i n a g a r .

Akmaj ian , A . 1970. On D z r i v i n y C l e f t S e n t a n c e s from Pseudo-Cle f t S c c t e n c z s . L i n g u i s t i c I n q u i r y 1.149-168.

Audzonov, 8 . S. 1965 . T h e T a a i l Language . Boscow: Nauka P u b l i s h i n g House.

---------- . 1969a . The Kannada Language . lloscow: Nauka P u b 1 i s h i n g House.

---------- . 1970. D r a v i d i a n L a n g u a g e s . floscow: Nauka p u b l i s h i n g House.

Ardzn,ld.H. 1937. A P r o g r e s s i v e Graialaar o f T a l u g u . Madras: C h r i s t i a n L i t e r a t u r e S o c i e t y . ( 4 t h ed. , 1 9 5 7 ) .

~ i l i g i r i , ~ . S . ( e d . ) 1970. P a p e r s a n d T a l k s . Hysore : C e n t r a l 1 n s t i ' t u t e o f I n d i a n Languages .

B r i g h t , W e 1958. A i i O u t l i n e o f C o Z l o q u i a l Kannadd. Poona: Deccan C o l l e g e Monograph S e r i e s , 22 .

B l o c h , J . 1954 . T h e G r a m m a t i c a l S t r u c t u r e o f D r a v i d i a n Languages . D ~ c c a n C o l l e g e Handbook S e r i e s , no. 3. Poona: Deccan C o l l e g s P o s t - G r a d u a t e a n d B e s e a r c h I n s t i t u t e .

C a l d n z l 1 , R . 1974. A C o m p a r a t i v e Grammar o f t h e D r a v i d i a n o r S o u t h I n d i a n f a ~ i l y o f L a n g u a g e s . N z w D e l h i : O r i e n t a l Books R e p r i n t C o r p o r a t i o n : d i s t r i b u t e d by f l u n s h i r a m R a n o h a r l a l P u b l i s h e r s . 3 r d . e d i t i o n ; 1st. edition 1856.

C h o a s k y , N . 1957. S y n t a c t i c S r u c t u r e s . Mouton: T h e Hague.

----- ----- . 1964. C u r r e n t I s s u e s i n L i n g u i s t i c Theory . Mouton: The Hague.

Page 131: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

---------- . 7965. Aspects o f the T h e o r y of S y n c a x , Cambridge: H I T P r e s s .

--.-------- . 1970. Remarks o n N o m i n a l i s a t i o n . I n R . Jacobs a n d P. Rosenbaum, e d s . , R a a d i n g s i n E n g l i s h T r a n s f o r m a t i o n a l Grammar, U a l t h a a , flass, : Ginn a n d Co., pp . 384-221.

---------- . 1977. C e e p S t r u c t u r e , S u r f ace S t r u c t u r e , a n d St inar t ic I n t e r p r ? t a t i o n , I n D. S t s i n b e r g a n d L. J a k o b o v i t s , eds. , S e m a n t i c s : An I n t e r - d i s c i p l i n a r y R e a d e r i n P h i l o s o p h y , L i n g u i s t i c s , a n d P s y c h o l o g y . Neu York: C a m b r i d g e U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , pp. 183-216.

---------- . 1973. C o n d i t i o n s on T r a n s f o r a a t i o n s . I n S, Anderson a n d P, K i p a r s k y , e d s . , A F e s t s c h r i f t f o r fforris H a l l e . fgew York: H o l t , R i n e h a r t a n d H i n s t o n , pp.232-286.

---------- . 1975. R s f l 9 c t i o n s on Language . N e w York: P a n t h e o n Books.

Chomsky,N., a n d L a s n i k , H . 1977. F i l t e r s a n d C o n t r o l . L i n g u i s t i c I n q u i r y V I ? . 3 .425-504.

Emo~ds, J . E . 1976. A T r a n s f o r a a t i o n a l Approach t o E n g l i s h S y n t a x : R o o t , S t u c t u r e - P r e s e r v i n g a n d L o c a l T r a n s - f o r a a t i o n s , M 2 w York: Academic P r e s s .

Fodor,J. A . , ar,d K a t z , J . J. ( ~ d s . ) 1 9 6 4 , The S t r u c t u r e of Language: R e a d i n g s i n the P h i l o s o p h y of Language, Englewood C l i f f s , N. J,: P r e n t i c e - H a l l .

Gowda, K. S. G u r u b a s a v e , 1970, N a g a t i o n i n Kannada. I n H . S . ~ i l i g i r i , e d . , P a p e r s a n d T a l k s , pp, 1-4.

H u s t , J . R , , a n d Brame,B.K. 1976 . J a c k e n d o f f o n I n t e r p r e t i v e S e m a n t i c s : A Review of S e m a n t i c I n t e r p r e t a t i o ic G e n e r a t i v e Grammar b y R. J a c k e n d o f f . L i n g u i s t i c A n a l y s i s 11.3.243-277.

J a c k u n d o f f , R . S. 1969 . An I n t e r p r e t i v e T h e o r y o f N e g a t i o n . F o u n d a t i o n s o f Language V , 218-241.

---------- . 1972 , S e m a n t i c I c t e r p r e t a t i o n i n G e n e r a t i v e Grammar. Cambridge: MIT P r e s s .

Page 132: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

Katz,J.J. 1966 . The P h i l o s o p h y of L a n g u a g e , N e w York: H a r p e r a n d R ~ W .

K a t z , J . J . , and F c d o r , J . A . 1963 . T n e S t r u c t u r e o f a S e m a n t i c T h e o r y . L a n g u a g e 39: 2: 170- 21 0. R e p r i n t e d i n F o d o r a n d Katz ( 1 9 5 4 ) , pp.479-518.

Katz, J . J , a n d P o s t a l , P . W . 1964 . An I n t e g r a t e d T h e o r y o f L i z g u i s t i c D e s c r i p t i o n s . Cambr idgs : HIT P r e s s .

K l ima , E, S , 1964 . N'gation i n E n g l i s h . I n J. A. F o d o r a n d J. J. K a t z , e a s . , T h e S t r u c t u r e o f L a n g u a g e : R e a d i n g s i n t h e P h i l o s o p h y o f L a n g u a g e , pp. 246-323.

K r i s h n a m u r t i , B h . , a n d Sarma,P ,S . 1968 . A Basic C o u r s s i n R o d e r a T e l u g u . H y d e r a b a d , I n d i a : d i s t r i b u t e d b y n o t i l a 1 B a n a r s i d a s s , J a v a h a r n a g a r , D e l h i - 7 ( I n d i a ) ,

Labov,W. 1 9 7 2 . L a n g u a g e i n t h e I n n a r City: S t u d i e s i n t h e B l a c k E n g l i s h V e r n a c u l a r . ~ h i l a d 2 l p h i a : Univ. of P e n n s y l v a n i a P r e s s .

Mas ica ,C.P . 1976. D e f i n i n g a L i n g u i s t i c Area: S o u t h Asia. C h i c a g o a n d London: Univ . o f c h i c a g o P r e s s .

McCormack, W. 1966 . Kannada: A C u l t u r a l I n t r o d u c t i o n t o t h e S p o k e n S t y l e s o f t h e L a n g u a g e . Madison: U n i v e r s i t y o f i d i s c o n s i n P r e s s .

N a d k a r n i , M. V. 1 9 7 0 . NP-Embedded S t r u c t u r e s i n Kannada and K o n k a n i U n p u b l i s h e d Ph, D d i s s e r t a t i o n , U n i v l r s i t y of C a l i f o r n i a , L o s A n g e l e s .

---------- . 1971 . T h e N a t u r e o f A d j e c t i v e s i n Kannada . I n d i a n L i n g u i s t i c s 32.3. 179-193.

---------- . 1972. S e n t e n t i a l C o m p l e m e n t s o n Nouns i n Kannada . Xnd ian L i c g u i s t i c s 33.1.1-23,

N a r a s i m h a c h a r , D.L. (ed.) 1 9 6 8 , S h a b d a m a n i d a r p a n a a (of K e s h i r a ja) . El yscre: S h a r a d a ~ a n d i r a ,

Page 133: Negation in Kannada - Summitsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/3062/b11993741.pdf · NEGATION IN KANNADA In this thesis, an examination of the syntax and semantics of negation (and

i?ar.gan,K. 1972. Some A s p e c t s of N s g a t i o r , i n S o u t h D r a v i d i a n L i t e r a r y L a n g u a y a s . I n 3. A g e s t h i a l i n g o m a c d S. V . Sharrmugam, eds., T h i r d S e m i l i a r o n D r a v i d i a n L i n g u i s t i c s , pp. 36 1-382,

i l amanujan , A . K . 1 9 6 3 , A ~ e n t r a t i v e Grammar o f Kannada . U n p u b l i s h e d Ph.D d i s s e r t a t i o n , I n d i a n a U n i v e r s i t y ,

Z a n ~ a r a o , ~ . 1 9 7 1. C o o r d i n a t i o r i o r S u b o r d i n a t i o n ? A S t u d y o f D r a v i d i a n K t v a r t h a k a . I n d i a n L i n g u i s t i c s 32. 1 -47 -53 .

S c h i f fman,H. F, 1968 , M o r p h o p h o n + ~ l c s o f t h e Kannada Verb. G l o s s a 2:2 191-212.

---------- , 1 9 6 9 , A T r a n s f o r m a t i o n a l Grammar of t h e T a m i l A s p e c t u a l S y s t ? ~ . ~ n i v e r s i t y o f W a s h i n g t o n : S t u d i e s i n L i n g u i s t i c s a n d L a n g u a g e L e a r n i n g J v o l , V I I .

---------- . 1974 . C o i n p l ~ x N a g a t i o n i n T a a i l : S e m a n t i c a n d S y n t a c t i c A s p e c t s , P a p e r p r e s e n t e d a t t h e F o u r t h I n t e r n a t i o n a l C o n f e r e n c e S e m i n a r o f T a m i l S t u d i e s , J a f f n a , S r i Lanka ,

Sc f i f f fman,H. I?. , a n d Eastman,C.PI. 1975 . Dravidian P h o n o l o g i c a l S y s t e m s . S e a t t l s : Univ. o f W a s h i n g t o n P r e s s .

S.ugui.r,H. 1973 . T h e I n t e r a c t i o n o f ' J a b T a k q ( * l J n t i l t ) a n d NEG i n H i n d i . P a p e r s f r o m t h e N i n t h R e g i o n a l f l e e t i n g of t h e C h i c a g o L i n g u i s t i c S o c i e t y . C h i c a g o : Dept . o f L i n g u i s t i c s , Univ . o f C h i c a g o , pp. 597-602,

S p ~ n c e r , H, 1 9 1 4 . A K a n a r e s e Grammar. Mysore .

S r i d h a r , S . N. 1 9 7 6 a , D a t i v e S u b j e c t s , R u l e G ~ v e r n m e n t , a n d R e l a t i o n a l Grammar. S t u d i s s i n t h e L i n g u i s t i c S c i e n c a s VT. 1 , 1 3 0 - I S 1 .

---------- . 1 9 7 6 b . D a t i v e S u b j e c t s . P a p e r s fro^ t h e T w e l f t h R 2 g i o n a l H e s t i n g o f t h e C h i c a g o L i n g u i s t i c S o c i e t y . C h i c a g o : Dspt, of L i n g u i s t i c s , U n i v e r s i t y o f C h i c a g o , p p . 582-593.

Venkates .1 I y e n g a r , B . 1960. Namma Nud i (Our L a n g u a g e ) , Ba n g a l o r a : Jeavana K a r y d l a y a ,


Recommended