Date post: | 21-May-2015 |
Category: |
Education |
Upload: | maria-kapsali |
View: | 1,401 times |
Download: | 0 times |
1
NETWORK ORGANISATIONS ANDCROSS-ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING
HRM3011
Dr Rea Prouska – Middlesex University Business School
Dr Maria Kapsali – Imperial College Business School
2
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Critically examine what is meant by ‘organisational learning’ and ‘the learning organisation’.
Explore what is meant by ‘network organisations’, how these form and operate.
Critically analyse the way in which ‘cross-organisational learning’ takes place.
3
THINK
Organisational Learning
The Learning Organisation
4
THE IMPORTANCE OF LEARNING IN ORGANISATIONS
What is the importance of learning in organisations?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUP4WcfNyAA
ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING
‘Organisational learning’ – based on observations of individual and collective learning processes in an organisation.
5
ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING Organisational learning is more than just the
sum of individual learning Members learn together when individual’s
learning impacts on and interrelates with others and begin to change the way things are done
Increase in collective competence How individual learning feeds into
organisational learning is just beginning to be addressed
Viewing the organisation as a process or a living organism helps
6
THE LEARNING ORGANISATION
Can be defined as ‘an organisation which facilitates the learning of all its members and continually transforms itself’ (Pedlar, Boydell and Burgoyne, 1987)
‘Learning is not restricted to discrete hunks of training activity, either fragmented or systematic, but is one where it has become a continuous process, and where on the job learning has become a way of life’ (Barham et al., 1988: 50).
7
8
PRINCIPLES AND CHARACTERISTICS OF A LEARNING ORGANISATION
It can learn as much, if not more, from failure as from success.
Rejects the adage ‘if it isn't broke, don’t fix it’ as it constantly scrutinises the way things are done.
Assumes that managers and workers closest to the design, manufacturing, distribution and sale of the product often know more about these activities than their superiors.
Seeks to move knowledge from one part of the organisationto another.
It encourages people at all levels of the organisation to learn regularly and rigorously from their work
It has systems for capturing and learning information and moving it where it is needed
It is able to transform itself continuously Spends a lot of energy looking outside its own boundaries
for knowledge.
9
DISCUSS
“Learning organisations are dreams which can never come true”. Discuss why you agree or disagree with this statement.
10
DIFFICULTIES WITH THE LEARNING ORGANISATION CONCEPT
Effective implementation of the learning organisation concept requires the resolution of:
Meaning (or definition) Management (or practical operational advice) Measurement (tools for assessment)
11
NETWORK ORGANISATIONS
12
CROSS-ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING
Through alliances and networks, organisations can learn and internalise new skills (Hyder and Abraha, 2004), particularly those hard to obtain and internalise by other means (Doz and Hamel, 1998:5).
However, strategic alliances cannot easily replace the internal development of organisational capabilities (Chan and Wong, 1994). Why?
13
PROCESSES OF CROSS-ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING (1)
Experience: a firm’s independent experiment and acquisition of knowledge through trial and error (Osland and Yaprak, 1995).
14
PROCESSES OF CROSS-ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING (2)
Imitation: an attempt to learn about the strategies, technologies and functional activities of other firms and to internalise this second-hand experience (Osland and Yaprak, 1995). Open imitation: one partner agrees to let the
other partner use, for example, a particular technology under specified conditions (Hyder and Abraha, 2004).
Secret imitation: the owner of the resource has no intention of letting the partner imitate (Hyder and Abraha, 2004).
15
PROCESSES OF CROSS-ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING (3)
Grafting: organisations increase their store of knowledge by formally acquiring another firm or by developing a long-term alliance with another organisation that possesses information not previously available within the organisation (Osland and Abraha, 2004). Grafting is often faster than learning by experience and more complete than learning through imitation.
16
PROCESSES OF CROSS-ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING (4)
Synergism: firms collaborate to produce new knowledge. Through collaboration partners can develop innovations that may not have been possible through independent efforts (Osland and Abraha, 2004).
17
KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER
The replication of knowledge in alliances requires both firms to implement managerial processes to transfer and receive knowledge (Wang and Nicholas , 2005).
Wang and Nicholas (2005) distinguish learning into collective and competitive: Collective learning occurs in cases where
partners learn to work together and mutually acquire knowledge.
Competitive learning occurs when partners strive to out-learn each other.
18
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PARTNERS Critical to a long-lasting cross-organisational
learning process is the relationship between the partners.
Many relationships never evolve, while most enter a deep crisis within the first three years
The key to longevity of contracting relationships is learning and adjustment, first to each other, then to changed circumstances.
Successful alliances and networks go through cycles of learning, re-evaluation, and readjustment over time. As the partnership evolves, partners re-evaluate the potential of the alliance to create value, the expected balance and equity of value capture among them, and their ability and commitment to adjust to the existing conditions of the alliance.
19
20
FACTORS AFFECTING THE OUTCOME OF CROSS-ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING INITIATIVES
Ideas?
21
FACTORS
Industry/sector Type of relationship Trust, risk, power and control in relationship Organisational strategy Organisational culture Learning culture/strategy Knowledge management processes
22
LEARNING=KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER
Types of trans-organizational learning transfer: Alliances, mergers, acquisitions, projects, networks
Depends on the degree of integration within the supply-value chains between the organizations
Less More Projects Alliances Mergers Acquisitions
Networks
Is this correct?
relatedness of the knowledge bases between the acquiring and acquired firms and whether the rationale of the jointed activity
23
CHARACTERISTICS OF ORGANIZATIONAL NETWORKS
Interaction Content = the purpose of
the interaction
Direction = direction of the flow of interaction or indication of lack of reciprocity
Durability = the period over which a certain set of links to the organization is activated and used
Intensity = volume of information, funds, decisions, flowing between given nodes
Frequency = frequency of interaction or contact
Shape Reachability Density = degree of
interconnectedness of a group of organizations cohesiveness vs isolationism
Range = the number of direct links to an organization to mobilize support on an issue
Composition = diversity and conflict within teams (lately the role of innovation)
24
WHO are the people at the interfaces of these networks
Within the organization: middle managers
Across organizations: project managers
WHERE are the boundaries between value chains when density of interaction increases
WHAT are the obstacles for learning coming from networking
HOW can organizations control the type and level of learning through networks
WHICH types of learning are favoured by which types of relations
brokerage, power, trust and reputation
dynamics of conflict and consensus
distribution of power
Combine knowledge assets coordinated management of functions, the
bilateral transfer of expert staff, or the transfer for further development of products or processes
synergies that can occur from relatedness the impact of both technological and
market relatedness on learning combinations of two factors: the
complementarity or similarity of the knowledge and the complementarity or similarity of the production capabilities of the target and the acquiring firm
Knowledge and integration approach = the rationale of the deal
complementarity or similarity
appropriate integration strategy organizational design and strategy
25
TASK AND NETWORK NEED (KATZ AND LAZER, 2003: 97)
Lazer & Katz, 2003] Lazer D. & N. Katz, 2003, “Building effective intra-organizational networks: the role of teams.” Research Paper, Centre for Public Leadership, J.F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
26
ACTIVITY – 10 MINUTES
What are the differences between these types of organizational interaction – what parts of their value chain do they share
How exactly learning happens to these different types
When does networking impede rather than support learning and goal achievement