+ All Categories
Home > Education > Networked Participatory Action Research: How it worked in the first year of the Future(s) of Ed...

Networked Participatory Action Research: How it worked in the first year of the Future(s) of Ed...

Date post: 26-Jan-2015
Category:
Upload: alana-james
View: 547 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
The Future(s) of Education Project puts networked participatory action research in motion using an primarily web based context. this research presentation covers the first year as it discusses the development for the network. Presented at CARN 2009, Athens.
18
Networked Participatory Action Research to Address the Future(s) of Education: First Year Successes and Challenges A presentation at the Collaborative Action Research Network conference, CARN, 2009: Athens, Greece, 31 October, 2009.
Transcript
Page 1: Networked Participatory Action Research: How it worked in the first year of the Future(s) of Ed Project

•Networked Participatory Action Research to Address the Future(s) of Education: First Year Successes

and Challenges

A presentation at the Collaborative Action Research Network conference, CARN,

2009: Athens, Greece, 31 October, 2009.

Page 2: Networked Participatory Action Research: How it worked in the first year of the Future(s) of Ed Project

Interesting Ideas

Page 3: Networked Participatory Action Research: How it worked in the first year of the Future(s) of Ed Project

a hard job, little pay, difficult work place

focus on efforts to improve schools

Page 4: Networked Participatory Action Research: How it worked in the first year of the Future(s) of Ed Project

Networked participatory action research

Page 5: Networked Participatory Action Research: How it worked in the first year of the Future(s) of Ed Project

How Do We Prepare Our Young People to Thrive in the World They Will Inherit?

A world we cannot imagine

Page 6: Networked Participatory Action Research: How it worked in the first year of the Future(s) of Ed Project

Context

www.futureofeducationproject.net

Page 7: Networked Participatory Action Research: How it worked in the first year of the Future(s) of Ed Project

Meanwhile in South Florida, USA

Page 8: Networked Participatory Action Research: How it worked in the first year of the Future(s) of Ed Project
Page 9: Networked Participatory Action Research: How it worked in the first year of the Future(s) of Ed Project
Page 10: Networked Participatory Action Research: How it worked in the first year of the Future(s) of Ed Project

Rese

arch

Des

ign

Page 11: Networked Participatory Action Research: How it worked in the first year of the Future(s) of Ed Project

Data from

• Christ Church, New Zealand• Isle of Wight, United Kingdom• Florida, USA• Colorado, USA• Kampala, Uganda• Kinsale, Ireland• Calcutta, India• Site visits from 44

countries

Page 12: Networked Participatory Action Research: How it worked in the first year of the Future(s) of Ed Project

1. Willingness to consider alternatives to schools (88%)

2. Focus on problems rather than strength building perspective

3. Hole in the Wall was popular 4. Links to Ivan Illich

Page 13: Networked Participatory Action Research: How it worked in the first year of the Future(s) of Ed Project
Page 14: Networked Participatory Action Research: How it worked in the first year of the Future(s) of Ed Project

 

Educator-driven process.

Students driven process.

Educator-driven curricula.

Educator-driven curricular choices with professionals the guiding, and assessing the entire process.

Educator-driven curricular choices delivered in online or other modular context, so that students decide upon and employ skill sets and outcomes of their own choosing.

Student-driven curricula.

Student-driven curricular choices with adults facilitating process and skill sets that aid mastery.

Student-driven curricular choices with little or no adult facilitation (LIE).

CHOICE: educator/student-driven curricula/process

Page 15: Networked Participatory Action Research: How it worked in the first year of the Future(s) of Ed Project

•2008-2009 NPAR:Qualities that made things work

Vs. Inhibiting Factors

ExcitementConnectionRegularityYouth Voice

• Time• Busy-ness• Lack of Belief

Page 16: Networked Participatory Action Research: How it worked in the first year of the Future(s) of Ed Project

•Lessons

International perspectivesExploration vs ImprovementLocal teams will question involvementThe world is lurking

Page 17: Networked Participatory Action Research: How it worked in the first year of the Future(s) of Ed Project

Why Not You?

We are actively recruiting:

• Youth videos/ideas/voice• Survey takers• Team leaders for 3 mtgs.

Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever does.

Margaret Mead

Page 18: Networked Participatory Action Research: How it worked in the first year of the Future(s) of Ed Project

www.futureofeducationproject.net

http://www.socialurl.com/alanajames

[email protected]


Recommended