+ All Categories
Home > Documents > New Home Sales vs. NAHB Wells Fargo Index Housing Starts · of 1 million or more, Austin-Round...

New Home Sales vs. NAHB Wells Fargo Index Housing Starts · of 1 million or more, Austin-Round...

Date post: 17-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
12
This report is available on wellsfargo.com/economics and on Bloomberg WFRE. September 30, 2015 Economics Group Housing Continues to Show Improvement Continued turmoil in the global financial markets and slower growth overseas continues to fuel doubts about the U.S. economic outlook. Overall growth has held up relatively well, however, with real GDP expanding at an upwardly revised 3.9 percent annual rate during the second quarter and nonfarm employment continuing to post solid gains. Conditions have improved so much that several Federal Reserve Bank presidents and Federal Reserve Board governors have pointedly noted that they feel the Federal Reserve should boost short-term interest rates before the end of this year. Such a move would hardly come as a surprise, as most forecasts, including ours, have incorporated at least one quarter-point increase in the federal funds rate for 2015. That said, a rate hike is still far from a sure thing and will depend upon economic conditions leading up to the next two Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meetings. Assessing the strength of the U.S. economy is not an easy task. GDP growth has been unusually volatile in recent years, with weakness during the early and latter parts of the year and robust gains during the spring and summer. The pattern has defied the statistical agencies best efforts to correct for ordinary seasonal variations. Swings in economic growth have been amplified by unusually harsh winter weather, port disruptions, government shutdowns and possibly some echo from the Great Recession, which has led to more pronounced seasonal swings in measured economic activity. As we sift through the data, one trend seems abundantly clear–the further you get away from the global economic slowdown the better the economy seems to be. The four areas most directly affected by the global economic slowdown–energy, mining, agriculture and manufacturing–collectively account for 16 percent of real GDP and accounted for 20 percent of real GDP growth during the first five years of the recovery. These four sectors are exceptionally capital-intensive, however, and account for a smaller share of employment. Figure 1 Figure 2 Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, NAHB and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 Housing Starts Millions of Units Multifamily Starts Multifamily Forecast Single-family Starts Single-family Forecast Forecast 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 0 150 300 450 600 750 900 1,050 1,200 1,350 1,500 1,650 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 New Home Sales vs. NAHB Wells Fargo Index Thousands of Units, SAAR, Index New Home Sales: Aug @ 552.0 (Left Axis) NAHB Wells Fargo Index: Sep @ 62.0 (Right Axis) Special Commentary Mark Vitner, Senior Economist [email protected] ● (704) 410-3277 Anika R. Khan, Senior Economist [email protected] (704) 410-3271 Misa Batcheller, Economic Analyst [email protected] (704) 410-3060 Housing Chartbook: September 2015 Continued turmoil in the global financial markets and slower growth overseas continues to fuel doubts about the U.S. economic outlook.
Transcript
Page 1: New Home Sales vs. NAHB Wells Fargo Index Housing Starts · of 1 million or more, Austin-Round Rock, TX and Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI had the lowest jobless rates in

This report is available on wellsfargo.com/economics and on Bloomberg WFRE.

September 30, 2015

Economics Group

Housing Continues to Show Improvement Continued turmoil in the global financial markets and slower growth overseas continues to fuel doubts about the U.S. economic outlook. Overall growth has held up relatively well, however, with real GDP expanding at an upwardly revised 3.9 percent annual rate during the second quarter and nonfarm employment continuing to post solid gains. Conditions have improved so much that several Federal Reserve Bank presidents and Federal Reserve Board governors have pointedly noted that they feel the Federal Reserve should boost short-term interest rates before the end of this year. Such a move would hardly come as a surprise, as most forecasts, including ours, have incorporated at least one quarter-point increase in the federal funds rate for 2015. That said, a rate hike is still far from a sure thing and will depend upon economic conditions leading up to the next two Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meetings.

Assessing the strength of the U.S. economy is not an easy task. GDP growth has been unusually volatile in recent years, with weakness during the early and latter parts of the year and robust gains during the spring and summer. The pattern has defied the statistical agencies best efforts to correct for ordinary seasonal variations. Swings in economic growth have been amplified by unusually harsh winter weather, port disruptions, government shutdowns and possibly some echo from the Great Recession, which has led to more pronounced seasonal swings in measured economic activity. As we sift through the data, one trend seems abundantly clear–the further you get away from the global economic slowdown the better the economy seems to be.

The four areas most directly affected by the global economic slowdown–energy, mining, agriculture and manufacturing–collectively account for 16 percent of real GDP and accounted for 20 percent of real GDP growth during the first five years of the recovery. These four sectors are exceptionally capital-intensive, however, and account for a smaller share of employment.

Figure 1

Figure 2

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, NAHB and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

0.0

0.3

0.6

0.9

1.2

1.5

1.8

2.1

2.4

0.0

0.3

0.6

0.9

1.2

1.5

1.8

2.1

2.4

80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18

Thousands

Housing StartsMillions of Units

Multifamily Starts

Multifamily Forecast

Single-family Starts

Single-family Forecast

Forecast

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

0

150

300

450

600

750

900

1,050

1,200

1,350

1,500

1,650

90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14

New Home Sales vs. NAHB Wells Fargo IndexThousands of Units, SAAR, Index

New Home Sales: Aug @ 552.0 (Left Axis)

NAHB Wells Fargo Index: Sep @ 62.0 (Right Axis)

Special Commentary

Mark Vitner, Senior Economist [email protected] ● (704) 410-3277

Anika R. Khan, Senior Economist [email protected] ● (704) 410-3271

Misa Batcheller, Economic Analyst [email protected] ● (704) 410-3060

Housing Chartbook: September 2015

Continued turmoil in the global financial markets and slower growth overseas continues to fuel doubts about the U.S. economic outlook.

Page 2: New Home Sales vs. NAHB Wells Fargo Index Housing Starts · of 1 million or more, Austin-Round Rock, TX and Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI had the lowest jobless rates in

Housing Chartbook: September 2015 WELLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC September 30, 2015 ECONOMICS GROUP

2

Domestic Economic Conditions Are More Important for Housing Demand

The further you get away from global economic conditions the better the economy looks and it is hard to find an industry that is more insulated from the ups and downs of the global economy than housing. The demand for housing is largely derived from the underlying growth in local economies around the country. The past couple of years have shown steady improvement throughout most of the country, with unemployment rates falling in 365 of the nation’s 387 metropolitan areas over the year. Of the 51 metropolitan areas with a 2010 Census population of 1 million or more, Austin-Round Rock, TX and Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI had the lowest jobless rates in August, at 3.2 percent and 3.3 percent, respectively. San Jose, CA, Charlotte, NC and Portland, OR posted the largest year-over-year job growth, with employment rising 5.5 percent, 4.0 percent and 4.0 percent, respectively. The largest year-to-year job gains were in New York City, Dallas and Los Angeles, which posted gains of 127,000 jobs, 84,900 jobs and 76,300 jobs, respectively.

The increased strength and improving breadth of job growth has led to a fairly dramatic increase in household formations across the country. So far, nearly all of the growth in households has shown up in the rental market but that appears to be changing. Homebuilders continue to report strengthening demand, particularly from first-time home buyers and retirees. Demand for apartments remains exceptionally strong, however, particularly in markets that have experienced strong job growth in recent years. The improvement in employment conditions has led to an increase in state-to-state migration. Many new arrivals tend to rent for some period of time before buying, adding further fuel to the apartment boom. The overall apartment vacancy rate was just 4.2 percent during the second quarter of 2015, roughly unchanged from a year earlier.

We continue to closely monitor housing markets in Texas and the rest of the energy patch as well as other major metropolitan areas with outsized exposure to the slowing global economy. Some areas have already felt a significant effect on employment, but most are fairly small metropolitan areas. The largest year-over-year job losses have been in Moline-Davenport-Rock Island, IA-IL, Lafayette, LA and Peoria, IL. All of have been adversely affected by weakening commodity prices and the related impact on manufacturers located in their area. The slowdown here, however, has little impact on housing, as these regions have seen little population growth in recent years.

While uncertainty about the global economy and interest rates has increased, we remain optimistic about housing. The fundamentals continue to improve and interest rates remain near historic lows. Tight supplies present somewhat of a hurdle, however, and have allowed prices to rebound much faster than incomes have risen. However, higher prices have also made suburban residential development more attractive. We expect homebuilding to strengthen next year, even if the global economic slowdown winds up taking an even larger bite out of U.S. growth in 2016.

Figure 3

Figure 4

Source: U.S. Dept. of Labor and U.S. Dept. of Commerce and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Los Angeles

New York

Dallas

San Francisco

Atlanta

Boston

Washington D.C.

Miami

Seattle

Chicago

San Jose

Phoenix

Orlando

Detroit

Charlotte

Houston

San Diego

Riverside

Baltimore

Portland

MSA Employment Growth Number of Jobs Added Year-over-Year, in Thousands

Jobs Added

-1,500

-750

0

750

1,500

2,250

3,000

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 02 06 10 14

U.S. Homeowners vs. RentersPercent; Annual Change in Occupied Units, In Thousands

Renters: 2014 @ 1026.3 Thousand (Right Axis)

Homeowners: 2014 @ -234.5 Thousand (Right Axis)

Homeownership Rate: 2014 @ 64.5% (Left Axis)

Series Break

1981

The demand for housing is largely derived from the underlying growth in local economies around the country.

While uncertainty about the global economy and interest rates has increased, we remain optimistic about housing.

Page 3: New Home Sales vs. NAHB Wells Fargo Index Housing Starts · of 1 million or more, Austin-Round Rock, TX and Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI had the lowest jobless rates in

Housing Chartbook: September 2015 WELLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC September 30, 2015 ECONOMICS GROUP

3

Na

tio

na

l H

ou

sin

g O

utl

oo

k

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Real GDP,

perc

ent

change

-0.3

-2.8

2.5

1.6

2.3

2.2

2.4

2.4

2.6

2.4

Nonfa

rm E

mplo

ym

ent,

perc

ent

change

-0.6

-4.3

-0.7

1.2

1.7

1.7

1.9

1.8

1.7

1.5

Unem

plo

ym

ent

Rate

5.8

9.3

9.6

8.9

8.1

7.4

6.2

5.3

4.8

4.5

Hom

e C

onstr

uction

Tota

l Housin

g S

tart

s,

in t

housands

905.5

553.9

586.9

608.8

780.6

924.9

1003.3

1,1

20.0

1,2

50.0

1,3

50.0

Sin

gle

-Fam

ily S

tart

s,

in t

housands

622.0

445.0

471.1

430.5

535.3

617.7

647.8

720.0

820.0

910.0

Multifam

ily S

tart

s,

in t

housands

283.5

108.9

115.8

178.3

245.3

307.2

355.5

400.0

430.0

440.0

Hom

e S

ale

s

New

Hom

e S

ale

s,

Sin

gle

-Fam

ily,

in t

housands

485.0

374.0

321.0

305.0

369.0

429.0

437.0

540.0

630.0

700.0

Tota

l Exis

ting H

om

e S

ale

s,

in t

housands

4,1

10.0

4,3

40.0

4,1

90.0

4,2

60.0

4,6

60.0

5,0

90.0

4,9

40.0

5,3

70.0

5,5

00.0

5,5

00.0

Exis

ting S

ingle

-Fam

ily H

om

e S

ale

s,

in t

housands

3,6

60.0

3,8

70.0

3,7

08.0

3,7

87.0

4,1

28.0

4,4

84.0

4,3

44.0

4,7

50.0

4,8

50.0

4,8

50.0

Exis

ting C

ondom

iniu

m &

Tow

nhouse S

ale

s,

in t

housands

450.0

464.0

474.0

477.0

528.0

603.0

591.0

620.0

650.0

650.0

Hom

e P

rices

Media

n N

ew

Hom

e,

$ T

housands

232.1

216.7

221.8

227.2

245.2

268.9

282.8

296.0

308.0

318.0

Perc

ent

Change

-6.4

-6.6

2.4

2.4

7.9

9.7

5.2

4.7

4.1

3.3

Media

n E

xis

ting H

om

e,

$ T

housands

198.1

172.5

172.9

166.1

176.8

197.1

208.3

218.6

227.7

236.8

Perc

ent

Change

-9.5

-12.9

0.2

-3.9

6.4

11.5

5.7

4.9

4.2

4.0

FHFA (

OFHEO

) Hom

e P

rice I

ndex (

Purc

h O

nly

), P

ct

Chg

-7.9

-5.7

-3.0

-4.1

3.2

7.5

5.5

4.8

4.2

3.9

Case-Shiller

C-10 H

om

e P

rice I

ndex,

Perc

ent

Change

-16.7

-12.9

2.1

-3.5

0.3

11.7

7.9

4.5

3.9

3.7

Inte

rest

Rate

s -

Annual Avera

ges

Prim

e R

ate

4.8

83.2

53.2

53.2

53.2

53.2

53.2

53.3

14.1

35.1

3

Ten-Year

Tre

asury

Note

3.6

63.2

63.2

22.7

81.8

02.3

52.5

42.2

22.6

12.9

2

Conventional 30-Year

Fix

ed R

ate

, Com

mitm

ent

Rate

6.0

45.0

44.6

94.4

63.6

63.9

84.1

73.9

84.3

84.8

2

One-Year

ARM

, Eff

ective R

ate

, Com

mitm

ent

Rate

5.1

84.7

13.7

93.0

32.6

92.6

12.4

42.5

03.0

03.6

5

Fore

cast

as o

f: S

epte

mber

30,

2015

Sourc

e:

Federa

l R

eserv

e B

oard

, FH

FA

, M

BA

, N

AR

, S

&P,

U.S

. D

epart

ment

of

Com

merc

e,

U.S

. D

epart

ment

of

Labor

and W

ells F

arg

o S

ecuri

ties,

LLC

Forecast

Page 4: New Home Sales vs. NAHB Wells Fargo Index Housing Starts · of 1 million or more, Austin-Round Rock, TX and Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI had the lowest jobless rates in

Housing Chartbook: September 2015 WELLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC September 30, 2015 ECONOMICS GROUP

4

Mortgages

Mortgage applications trended lower in August, but picked back up in September. Purchase applications are up more than 25 percent from a year ago and refinancing activity grew 18 percent in the week ending Sept. 18.

The recent volatility in mortgage applications was largely due to the uncertainty that surrounded the September FOMC meeting (Sept. 16-17). There appears to have been a rush to lock in mortgage rates ahead of the FOMC meeting and, after soaring in the week prior to the meeting, applications fell the following week. Mortgage rates are essentially the same as they were prior to the meeting.

Source: Mortgage Bankers Association, FHLMC, U.S. Department of Commerce and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

9%

10%

11%0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14

New Home Sales vs. 30-Year Mortgage RateThousands, SAAR, FHLMC Conventional Fixed Rate Mortgage

New Home Sales: Aug @ 552.0 (Left Axis)

30-Year Fixed Mortg. Rate: Sep @ 3.9% (Inverted Right Axis)

100

125

150

175

200

225

250

275

300

100

125

150

175

200

225

250

275

300

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Conventional Mortgage to 10-Year Treasury SpreadBasis Points

Mortgage Spread: Sep @ 170 bps

0

100

200

300

400

500

0

100

200

300

400

500

92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14

Mortgage Applications for PurchaseSeasonally Adjusted Index, 1990=100

Weekly Figure: Sep-18 @ 214.2

Up From: Sep-18 @ 196.3

8-Week Average Up 21.8% From Same Period Last Year

Mort. Appl.: 8-Week Average: Sep-18 @ 202.3

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15

MBA Mortgage Credit Availability IndexIndex, Mar 2012 = 100

MCAI: Aug @ 126.1

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14

Mortgage Applications for Refinancing4-Week Moving Average, Seasonally Adjusted, Index 1990 =100

Weekly Figure: Sep-18 @ 1,833Up from 1,558 on Sep-114-Week Average: Sep-18 @ 1,7524-Week Average Up 28.0% from Same Period Last Year

Page 5: New Home Sales vs. NAHB Wells Fargo Index Housing Starts · of 1 million or more, Austin-Round Rock, TX and Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI had the lowest jobless rates in

Housing Chartbook: September 2015 WELLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC September 30, 2015 ECONOMICS GROUP

5

Single-Family Construction

Single-family housing starts slipped for the second straight month in August, declining to a 739,000-unit annual rate. Despite the dip, single-family starts remain 14.9 percent above their year ago level.

There have also been encouraging signs for the outlook of residential construction. Permits for single-family homes rose to a 699,000-unit annual rate in August and are up 8.7 percent over the year. Inventories of completed new homes also remain near historic lows, at just 48,000 homes nationwide in August. The low level of completed new home inventory means that just about any incremental boost to sales will provide a lift to starts.

Source: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Association of Realtors, NAHB and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15

Existing & New Single-Family Home SalesBoth Series In Millions of Units, Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate

New Home Sales: Aug @ 0.6 Million (Left Axis)

Existing Home Sales: Aug @ 4.7 Million (Right Axis)

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14

Thousands

Single-Family Housing StartsSAAR, In Millions, 3-Month Moving Average

Single-Family Housing Starts: Aug @ 729K

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14

Thousands

Single-Family Building Permits SAAR, In Millions, 3-Month Moving Average

Single-Family Building Permits: Aug @ 690K

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11 13 15

Expected Single-Family Home SalesPercent, NAHB Housing Market Index

In the Next 6 Months: Sep @ 68.0%

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11 13 15

Single-Family Housing Completions Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate, In Millions

Single-Family Housing Completions: Aug @ 646K

Page 6: New Home Sales vs. NAHB Wells Fargo Index Housing Starts · of 1 million or more, Austin-Round Rock, TX and Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI had the lowest jobless rates in

Housing Chartbook: September 2015 WELLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC September 30, 2015 ECONOMICS GROUP

6

Multifamily Construction

Multifamily starts fell 3.0 percent in August following

a 23.9 percent plunge the prior month. We suspect

that some of this weakness could be payback for the

almost 40 percent surge in June, fueled by the

impending expiration of a tax break for new

apartment construction in New York City. We had

noted then that we would likely see a payback in

coming months.

The fundamentals for the apartment market and

multifamily construction in general remain positive.

Stronger job growth has helped drive household

formation higher and has also encouraged more

state-to-state migration, which is fueling demand for

apartments. Millennials are also reaching a time in

their life where owning a home becomes more likely,

which is creating demand for townhomes.

Source: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, REIS Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14

Multifamily Housing StartsSAAR, In Thousands, 3-Month Moving Average

Multifamily Starts: Aug @ 387K

Multifamily Housing Starts: Aug @ 437K

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14

Multifamily Building Permits SAAR, In Thousands, 3-Month Moving Average

Multifamily Building Permits: Aug @ 522K

-80%

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

140%

-80%

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

140%

94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14

Private Multifamily Construction Spending Percent

3-Month Annual Rate: Jul @ 18.4%

Year-over-Year Percent Change: Jul @ 21.2%

-75

-50

-25

0

25

50

75

100

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

9%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Apartment Supply & DemandPercent, Thousands of Units

Apartment Net Completions: Q2 @ 46,417 Units (Right Axis)

Apartment Net Absorption: Q2 @ 44,480 Units (Right Axis)

Apartment Vacancy Rate: Q2 @ 4.2% (Left Axis)

-2.0%

-1.6%

-1.2%

-0.8%

-0.4%

0.0%

0.4%

0.8%

1.2%

1.6%

2.0%

-5.0%

-4.0%

-3.0%

-2.0%

-1.0%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Apartment Effective Rent GrowthQuarter-over-Quarter Percent Change

Quarter-over-Quarter: Q2 @ 1.1% (Right Axis)

Year-over-Year: Q2 @ 3.7% (Left Axis)

Page 7: New Home Sales vs. NAHB Wells Fargo Index Housing Starts · of 1 million or more, Austin-Round Rock, TX and Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI had the lowest jobless rates in

Housing Chartbook: September 2015 WELLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC September 30, 2015 ECONOMICS GROUP

7

Buying Conditions

While buying conditions remain relatively favorable, they have fallen back from the highs reached in 2013. Tight inventories and the entrance of institutional investor buyers have allowed home prices to rise faster than incomes, which has reduced affordability.

With the Fed looking to begin normalizing its short-term target rate this year, we expect mortgage rates to gradually rise over the next few years, which will likely reduce affordability even further.

Despite a further decline in overall housing affordability, mortgage rates should remain low relative to their historical norms. Demographics should also turn more favorable, with more Millennials forming families and buying homes.

Source: CoreLogic, S&P, Federal Reserve, Conference Board, NAR, U.S. Dept. of Commerce and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15

Housing Affordability, NAR-Home Sales Base = 100

Housing Affordability Index: Jul @ 151.2

6-Month Moving Average: Jul @ 163.2

50

70

90

110

130

150

170

190

50

70

90

110

130

150

170

190

76 79 82 85 88 91 94 97 00 03 06 09 12 15

U.S. Real Home PricesIndex, Jan. 2000=100, Not Seasonally Adjusted

U.S. Real Home Prices: Jul @ 134.5

Trough Trend

* CoreLogic HPI Deflated with CPI Less Shelter

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

9%

10%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

9%

10%

00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15

Confidence: Plans to Buy a HomePercent of Consumers, Conference Board

Plans to Buy a Home Within Six Months: Sep @ 6.3%

12-Month Moving Average: Sep @ 5.5%

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11 13 15

S&P Case-Shiller Home Price Index P/E RatioJanuary 1987=1, Seasonally Adjusted

S&P Case-Shiller P/E Ratio: Jul @ 1.33

S&P Case-Shiller C-10 Home Price Index Divided by CPI Owners' Equivalent Rent

-3%

-2%

-1%

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

-3%

-2%

-1%

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

85 88 91 94 97 00 03 06 09 12

Occupied Housing UnitsYear-over-Year Percent Change

Owner Occupied: Q2 @ -0.3%

Renter Occupied: Q2 @ 5.1%

Page 8: New Home Sales vs. NAHB Wells Fargo Index Housing Starts · of 1 million or more, Austin-Round Rock, TX and Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI had the lowest jobless rates in

Housing Chartbook: September 2015 WELLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC September 30, 2015 ECONOMICS GROUP

8

New Home Sales

New home sales rose 5.7 percent in August to a

552,000-unit annual pace. Sales have risen in

four of the past five months and are up more than

5 percent this year. The rise in sales is consistent

with the NAHB/Wells Fargo Housing Market

Index, which hit a new cycle high in September.

Although inventory levels have risen moderately

over the past few months, the level of completed

homes inventory remains exceptionally tight.

Completed inventories fell in August and remain

near an all-time low at 48,000 units.

With overall sales still historically low, builders

have been focusing on higher-priced, higher-

margin homes. The median sales price rose

0.3 percent over the year to $294,700 in August.

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Association of Realtors and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

0

150

300

450

600

0

150

300

450

600

89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11 13 15

Inventory of New Homes for SaleNon-Seasonally Adjusted, In Thousands

Inventory: Aug @ 221,000

Completed New Homes: Aug @ 46,000

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14

Months' Supply of New Homes Seasonally Adjusted

Months' Supply: Aug @ 4.7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

0

150

300

450

600

750

900

1,050

1,200

1,350

1,500

1,650

90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14

New Home Sales vs. NAHB Wells Fargo IndexThousands of Units, SAAR, Index

New Home Sales: Aug @ 552.0 (Left Axis)

NAHB Wells Fargo Index: Sep @ 62.0 (Right Axis)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11 13 15

New Home SalesNew Homes Sold During Month, Index 2002=100, 3-MMA

South: Aug @ 73.4

Midwest: Aug @ 34.3

West: Aug @ 54.6

Northeast: Aug @ 46.3

$150

$175

$200

$225

$250

$275

$300

$325

$150

$175

$200

$225

$250

$275

$300

$325

02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15

Thousands

Median New & Existing Home Sale PricesIn Thousands, Single-Family

Median New Sales Price: Aug @ $292,700

Median Existing Sales Price: Aug @ $230,200

Page 9: New Home Sales vs. NAHB Wells Fargo Index Housing Starts · of 1 million or more, Austin-Round Rock, TX and Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI had the lowest jobless rates in

Housing Chartbook: September 2015 WELLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC September 30, 2015 ECONOMICS GROUP

9

Existing Home Sales

Existing home sales slipped slightly in August, and fell to a 5.31 million-unit pace. Although sales slowed moderately, they remain up 6.2 percent over the past year.

Inventory levels remain low relative to historical norms and declined 1.7 percent year-over-year in August. Tight supplies and rising home prices are likely keeping some potential buyers on the sideline, and restraining overall sales.

The proportion of first-time home buyers rose to 32 percent and is back at its cycle high. The increase in first-time buyers is an encouraging sign and may indicate that the long slide in the homeownership rate is finally reaching a bottom.

Source: NAR, U.S. Department of Commerce and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

U.S. Distressed Home SalesPercent of Total Sales

Total Distressed: Aug @ 7.0%

24%

27%

30%

33%

36%

24%

27%

30%

33%

36%

First-Time Home BuyersShare of Existing Home Sales

Share of Total Existing Home Sales: Aug @ 32.0%

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0

7.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0

7.5

04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15

Existing Home Sales Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate, In Millions

Existing Home Sales: Aug @ 5.31M

-15%

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

-15%

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

$0-100K $100-250K $250-500K $500-750K $750-1M $1M+

Percent Change in Existing-Home Sales Year-over-Year Percent Change, By Price Range

August 2015

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15

Single-Family Home InventoryMillions of Units

New Homes: Aug @ 0.22M

Existing Homes: Aug @ 2.03M

Page 10: New Home Sales vs. NAHB Wells Fargo Index Housing Starts · of 1 million or more, Austin-Round Rock, TX and Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI had the lowest jobless rates in

Housing Chartbook: September 2015 WELLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC September 30, 2015 ECONOMICS GROUP

10

Home Prices

Most measures of home price appreciation have

stabilized around 5 percent year-over-year growth.

According to the S&P Case Shiller 20-City Index,

prices grew 5.0 percent year-over-year in July with

San Francisco, Denver, Dallas and Portland

reporting the largest price gains from a year

earlier. On the other hand, housing markets in

New York City, Chicago and Washington, D.C.,

saw the pace of price appreciation slow modestly.

Some of the largest gains in home prices have been

in large gateway markets, such as San Francisco,

Los Angeles Seattle, Miami, New York City and

Chicago. Foreign purchases have cooled a bit more

recently, however, and may be contributing to the

recent moderation in price appreciation.

Source: CoreLogic, NAR, S&P, FHFA, U.S. Department of Commerce and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

-6.0%

-5.0%

-4.0%

-3.0%

-2.0%

-1.0%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

-12.5%

-10.0%

-7.5%

-5.0%

-2.5%

0.0%

2.5%

5.0%

7.5%

10.0%

12.5%

15.0%

96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14

FHFA Purchase-Only Index, NSABars = Q/Q % Change Line = Yr/Yr % Change

Purchase-Only Index: Q2 @ 3.5% (Right Axis)Purchase-Only Index: Q2 @ 5.4% (Left Axis)

10.4%

10.3%

8.7%

8.5%

7.3%

7.3%

6.2%

6.1%

5.8%

5.5%

5.4%

5.4%

4.9%

4.6%

4.3%

3.6%

3.1%

1.9%

1.8%

1.7%

4.5%

5.0%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12%

San Francisco

Denver

Dallas

Portland

Seattle

Miami

Las Vegas

Los Angeles

Atlanta

Tampa

San Diego

Detroit

Charlotte

Phoenix

Boston

Minneapolis

Cleveland

New York City

Chicago

Washington, D.C.

C-10

C-20

S&P/Case-Shiller Home PricesYear-over-Year Percent Change, NSA

July 2015

-30%

-25%

-20%

-15%

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

-30%

-25%

-20%

-15%

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11 13 15

Home PricesYear-over-Year Percentage Change

Median Sale Price: Aug @ $230,200Median Sale Price, 3-M Mov Avg: Aug @ 5.6%FHFA Purchase Only Index: Jul @ 5.8%S&P/Case-Shiller Composite-10: Jul @ 4.5%

-28%

-24%

-20%

-16%

-12%

-8%

-4%

0%

4%

8%

12%

16%

20%

-28%

-24%

-20%

-16%

-12%

-8%

-4%

0%

4%

8%

12%

16%

20%

04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15

Median Single-Family Existing Home PriceYear-over-Year Percentage Change

Median Price Change: Aug @ 5.1%

6-Month Moving Average: Aug @ 7.1%

Median Sale Price: Aug @ $230,200

-20%

-16%

-12%

-8%

-4%

0%

4%

8%

12%

16%

20%

-20%

-16%

-12%

-8%

-4%

0%

4%

8%

12%

16%

20%

90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14

CoreLogic HPI: United StatesYear-over-Year Percent Change

United States: Jul @ 6.9%

Page 11: New Home Sales vs. NAHB Wells Fargo Index Housing Starts · of 1 million or more, Austin-Round Rock, TX and Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI had the lowest jobless rates in

Housing Chartbook: September 2015 WELLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC September 30, 2015 ECONOMICS GROUP

11

Renovation and Remodeling

Spending for renovations and remodeling continues to trend higher. Spending was driven primarily by investor purchasers earlier in the recovery who converted single-family homes and condominiums into rental units. More recently, remodeling outlays have been driven by rising home values and improving consumer confidence.

In recent years, many homeowners refinanced their homes and are now more apt to remain in place, given that they are building equity in an appreciating asset, something that is hard to find right now. Moreover, the increased appeal of urban living continues to support renovations to the existing stock of homes located close to key major cities and key employment centers.

Source: Joint Center for Housing Studies, U.S. Department of Commerce, NAHB and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

-50%

-40%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

-50%

-40%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014

Residential InvestmentYear-over-Year Percent Change

Improvements: Q2 @ 4.0%

Res. Investment Ex. Improvements: Q2 @ 14.4%

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15

NAHB Remodeling Market IndexIndex, Seasonally Adjusted

Overall Index: Q2 @ 58.8Future Expectations: Q2 @ 58.4Backlog of Remodeling Jobs: Q2 @ 58.2

$0

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

$600

$700

$800

$900

$1,000

$1,100

$0

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

$600

$700

$800

$900

$1,000

$1,100

92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14

Residential Investment Billions of Dollars

Other: Q2 @ $7.7 BBrokers' Commissions: Q2 @ $142.6 BImprovements: Q2 @ $176.7 BNew Building: Q2 @ $263.6 B

1969 or earlier

41%

1970 to 1979

17%

1980 to 1989

12%

1990 to 1999

15%2000 to 2009

15%

Share of Owner-Occupied HousingYear Structure Built - 2013

$100

$110

$120

$130

$140

$150

$160

$100

$110

$120

$130

$140

$150

$160

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Leading Indicator of Remodeling ActivityIn Billions, 4-Q Moving Total, Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies

JCHSForecast

Page 12: New Home Sales vs. NAHB Wells Fargo Index Housing Starts · of 1 million or more, Austin-Round Rock, TX and Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI had the lowest jobless rates in

Wells Fargo Securities, LLC Economics Group

Diane Schumaker-Krieg Global Head of Research, Economics & Strategy

(704) 410-1801 (212) 214-5070

[email protected]

John E. Silvia, Ph.D. Chief Economist (704) 410-3275 [email protected]

Mark Vitner Senior Economist (704) 410-3277 [email protected]

Jay H. Bryson, Ph.D. Global Economist (704) 410-3274 [email protected]

Sam Bullard Senior Economist (704) 410-3280 [email protected]

Nick Bennenbroek Currency Strategist (212) 214-5636 [email protected]

Eugenio J. Alemán, Ph.D. Senior Economist (704) 410-3273 [email protected]

Anika R. Khan Senior Economist (704) 410-3271 [email protected]

Azhar Iqbal Econometrician (704) 410-3270 [email protected]

Tim Quinlan Economist (704) 410-3283 [email protected]

Eric Viloria, CFA Currency Strategist (212) 214-5637 [email protected]

Sarah House Economist (704) 410-3282 [email protected]

Michael A. Brown Economist (704) 410-3278 [email protected]

Erik Nelson Economic Analyst (704) 410-3267 [email protected]

Alex Moehring Economic Analyst (704) 410-3247 [email protected]

Misa Batcheller Economic Analyst (704) 410-3060 [email protected]

Michael Pugliese Economic Analyst (704) 410-3156 [email protected]

Donna LaFleur Executive Assistant (704) 410-3279 [email protected]

Cyndi Burris Senior Admin. Assistant (704) 410-3272 [email protected]

Wells Fargo Securities Economics Group publications are produced by Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, a U.S broker-dealer registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, and the Securities Investor Protection Corp. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, distributes these publications directly and through subsidiaries including, but not limited to, Wells Fargo & Company, Wells Fargo Bank N.A., Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC, Wells Fargo Securities International Limited, Wells Fargo Securities Asia Limited and Wells Fargo Securities (Japan) Co. Limited. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC. ("WFS") is registered with the Commodities Futures Trading Commission as a futures commission merchant and is a member in good standing of the National Futures Association. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("WFBNA") is registered with the Commodities Futures Trading Commission as a swap dealer and is a member in good standing of the National Futures Association. WFS and WFBNA are generally engaged in the trading of futures and derivative products, any of which may be discussed within this publication. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC does not compensate its research analysts based on specific investment banking transactions. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC’s research analysts receive compensation that is based upon and impacted by the overall profitability and revenue of the firm which includes, but is not limited to investment banking revenue. The information and opinions herein are for general information use only. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC does not guarantee their accuracy or completeness, nor does Wells Fargo Securities, LLC assume any liability for any loss that may result from the reliance by any person upon any such information or opinions. Such information and opinions are subject to change without notice, are for general information only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sales of any security or as personalized investment advice. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC is a separate legal entity and distinct from affiliated banks and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company © 2015 Wells Fargo Securities, LLC.

Important Information for Non-U.S. Recipients

For recipients in the EEA, this report is distributed by Wells Fargo Securities International Limited ("WFSIL"). WFSIL is a U.K. incorporated investment firm authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. The content of this report has been approved by WFSIL a regulated person under the Act. For purposes of the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority’s rules, this report constitutes impartial investment research. WFSIL does not deal with retail clients as defined in the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive 2007. The FCA rules made under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 for the protection of retail clients will therefore not apply, nor will the Financial Services Compensation Scheme be available. This report is not intended for, and should not be relied upon by, retail clients. This document and any other materials accompanying this document (collectively, the "Materials") are provided for general informational purposes only.

SECURITIES: NOT FDIC-INSURED/NOT BANK-GUARANTEED/MAY LOSE VALUE


Recommended