+ All Categories
Home > Documents > New interfaces

New interfaces

Date post: 13-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: martha
View: 15 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
New interfaces. The future of the OPAC at Cambridge Ed Chamberlain – Systems Librarian, University Library. Overview. Problems with current OPAC We are not alone – how others feel Wither the OPAC ? New data standards Resource discovery platforms. Background. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
26
Cambridge University Library New interfaces The future of the OPAC at Cambridge Ed Chamberlain – Systems Librarian, University Library
Transcript
Page 1: New interfaces

Cambridge University Library

New interfaces

The future of the OPACat Cambridge

Ed Chamberlain – Systems Librarian, University Library

Page 2: New interfaces

Cambridge University Library

Overview

• Problems with current OPAC• We are not alone – how others feel• Wither the OPAC ?• New data standards• Resource discovery platforms

Page 3: New interfaces

Cambridge University Library

Background

• Systems Librarian at the UL for the past 9 months…• Worked on the Newton ‘facelift’• Very frustrated by the lack of options for customisation• Limited in how we could meet people’s expectations for a

new OPAC• Became aware of issues beyond the interface…

Page 4: New interfaces

Cambridge University Library

Page 5: New interfaces

Cambridge University Library

Page 6: New interfaces

Cambridge University Library

Newton / Webvoyage

• No new LMS migration for sometime• Nothing on market to justify pain of migration• Out of all of the Voyager components, the OPAC

is the one showing its age the most

Page 7: New interfaces

Cambridge University Library

Problems with the current OPAC

1) Architecture • Several separate databases comprising Voyager• Greater administrative overhead for ESS staff • Cause problems with any future systems migration• Universal Catalogue is ineffective at integrating the

separate record sets and providing consistently accurate results

Page 8: New interfaces

Cambridge University Library

Problems with the current OPAC

2) Interface quality• Does not meet modern web standards• Lack of customisation options• Outdated conceptions about search workflows• Unable to easily share records and data with other

systems (Marc + Z39.50, no XML)

Page 9: New interfaces

Cambridge University Library

Problems with the current OPAC

3) Digital material• Libraries are now providing non-bibliographic resources

alongside traditional material: – ejournals– ebooks – Reference and a&i databases– DSpace holdings

• Metadata held and accessed in separate ‘silo’s’

Page 10: New interfaces

Cambridge University Library

We are not alone – how others feel

Voyager users• Other Voyager users report similar issues with their

OPAC’s• Expecting a new OPAC two years ago…• Delayed by the Ex-Libris / Endeavor merger• Due as part of Voyager 7

Page 11: New interfaces

Cambridge University Library

Voyager 7 update

• New version of Webvoyage as part of Voyager 7• Unlikely to be anything radically different• Hope for better quality interface• Problems with multiple databases, duplicate

records and record quality will still be present …

Page 12: New interfaces

Cambridge University Library

We are not alone – how others feel

Other system users

• Of 66 survey respondents:

– 51 respondents do not love their OPACs, some expressing frustration or even outright hostility

– Four respondents do love their OPACs– Six are neutral

- XC Survey Report, University of Rochester, July 2007

http://www.extensiblecatalog.info/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/XC%20survey%20report.pdf

Page 13: New interfaces

Cambridge University Library

We are not alone – how others feel

Other system users

• The top issues expressed in these complaints were…

– Difficulty of customization (42 instances)– Inadequacy of search functions (31 instances)– Opacity of results and lack of grouping or faceting (27 instances)– Limitations of the user interface (16 instances)– Lack of Web 2.0 functionality (9 instances)– Backend problems (8 instances)– Lack of integration with databases or other systems (8 instances)

- XC Survey Report, University of Rochester, July 2007

http://www.extensiblecatalog.info/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/XC%20survey%20report.pdf

Page 14: New interfaces

Cambridge University Library

Wither the OPAC ?

• OPACS have fallen ‘behind the times’• Less relevant alongside e-resource platforms• Highly structured – 2-3 levels of screens to get

to results• Users expect search results within one click• Expect spellchecking, error messages, better

help

Page 15: New interfaces

Cambridge University Library

New data container standards

• MARC is old (40+ years)• Inefficient and unfriendly means to store data• Rest of the world uses XML – (MARC-XML,

MODS)

Page 16: New interfaces

Cambridge University Library

Page 17: New interfaces

Cambridge University Library

New data content standards

• Resource Description and Access (RDA) • Functional requirements for bibliographic

records (FRBR)• Semantic web technologies – (RDF)

Page 18: New interfaces

Cambridge University Library

Resource Discovery Platforms

• Growth of Resource Discovery Platforms • Separate platform for metadata• De-couple front end from the backend

management system

Page 19: New interfaces

Cambridge University Library

Resource Discovery Platforms

• Single point of search for a library• Encompass and amalgamate data from:

– Multiple LMS catalogues (Voyager)– ERM interfaces and knowledge bases (SFX,

Metasearch)– Local repositories (Dspace)

Page 20: New interfaces

Cambridge University Library

Resource discovery platforms

Interface• The ‘Google generation’ expects keyword

searching• Keyword based searching using traditionally

created records – argued that this gives a ‘best of both worlds’ fit

Page 21: New interfaces

Cambridge University Library

Products on the market

• Primo by Ex Libris• Prism 3 from Talis• Encore from III• Aquabrowser from Vubis (formerly GEAC)• Endeca information platform

Page 22: New interfaces

Cambridge University Library

Problems

• Potentially difficult to argue a funding case for, should this functionality not be part of an LMS anyway ?

• Data problems still remain – and would hamper any migration to a new LMS itself, let alone a new interface

Page 23: New interfaces

Cambridge University Library

Data problems

• Only solves the multiple database problem for the users

• New interfaces exposes old problems with data• Presentation of bib records alongside data from

A&I databases – risk of ‘swamping results’

Page 24: New interfaces

Cambridge University Library

What next ?For us…• Continue to support and develop Newton where

feasible• Track and investigate all options for a

replacement interface encompassing all library materials in Cambridge

Page 25: New interfaces

Cambridge University Library

What next ?For you…• Think about our consortia model • Data over container - i.e. AACR2 over MARC• How it would sit alongside non-MARC data

Page 26: New interfaces

Cambridge University Library

Thank you

• Ed Chamberlain - [email protected]


Recommended