+ All Categories
Home > Documents > NEW STRATIGRAPHIC INTERPRETATIONS OF THE JURASSIC ... · to the eolian systems. These eolian...

NEW STRATIGRAPHIC INTERPRETATIONS OF THE JURASSIC ... · to the eolian systems. These eolian...

Date post: 28-May-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
2
Figure 2. Paleogeographic map of the western U.S. during the Late Jurassic when the Bluff/Junction Creek Sandstone was being deposited as dunes migrated northeast through Colorado. From Peterson, 1994. “UPPER UNIT” “LOWER UNIT” Figure 3. Typical Junction Creek outcrop in the Gunnison area. Yellow line marks approximate position of the contact between the “lower” flat-bedded unit and “upper” cross-stratified unit. Note that highway lies directly on the contact of Proterozoic basement rocks. Metamorphic basement Morrison Formation Salt Wash Member Junction Creek Sandstone Brushy Basin Member Burro Canyon Formation Cretaceous Jurassic Figure 4. Stratigraphic column showing members of the Jurassic Morrison Formation in the Upper Gunnison basin, Colorado. Overlying and underlying units as well as unconformities are also shown. Nonconformity Proterozoic Wanakah Formation Morrison Formation Tidwell Member Salt Wash Member Bluff/ Junction Creek Sandstone Recapture Member Westwater Canyon Member Brushy Basin Member Burro Canyon Formation J-5 Unconformity Cretaceous Jurassic Figure 1. Stratigraphic column showing members of the Jurassic Morrison Formation in the Four Corners region. Overlying and underlying units as well as unconformities are also shown. A. B. C. D. Figure 5. Photographs of sedimentary features within the Junction Creek Sandstone in the Gunnison, Colorado area. A.) Symmetrical ripple marks near bottom of lower unit. B.) Coarse sand grains and chert lags along bedding plane at bottom of upper unit. C.) Contact between “lower” flat bedded silty sandstone and “upper” large scale cross stratified sandstone. D.) Cross-stratified dune-form within “upper” unit. 1m ABSTRACT A Jurassic sandstone that commonly overlies Proterozoic basement crops out in discrete locations around Gunnison, Colorado, forming massive red to tan cliffs and hoodoos. The sandstone locally underlies the Salt Wash Member of the Morrison Formation. Ongoing controversy over the nomenclature of several Jurassic units on the Colorado Plateau, coupled with the absence of lower Jurassic strata on the uplifted Uncompahgre highlands has resulted in ambiguity of stratigraphic relations for several units in the region. This particular Jurassic sandstone has been referred to as the Junction Creek Sandstone, the Junction Creek Sandstone Member of the Wanakah Formation, or an eolian unit within the Tidwell Member of the Morrison Formation. The Junction Creek Sandstone was named as a member of the Morrison Formation for exposures between Junction Creek and the Animas River in La Plata County, Colorado (Goldman and Spencer,1941). Two separate units within the member were initially noted, a lower horizontally banded part, and an upper, large-scale cross-stratified part. Thick cross-bedded sandstone sets in the Junction Creek are indicative of eolian dune deposition, whereas, the thin flat-laminated beds suggest interdunal or local sabkha deposition. Hansen (1968) mapped the eolian sandstone that overlies and underlies unnamed parts of the Wanakah, as the Junction Creek Member of the Wanakah Formation in the Smith Fork area of the Black Ridge quadrangle, Gunnison County, Colorado. O’Sullivan (1992a) points out that the name Junction Creek Sandstone has not been applied to the same stratigraphic interval everywhere and suggests that extension of the name into the Gunnison County area is tenuous. O’Sullivan (1992b) redesignated units previously mapped as the Junction Creek Sandstone, in the Black Canyon area as an eolian facies contained within the upper beds of the Tidwell Member of the Morrison Formation. Detailed study of units mapped as Junction Creek Sandstone in the upper Gunnison basin, Colorado, suggests that these units lie in the same stratigraphic position and are of the same lithology as the type Junction Creek. Based on the findings of this study, extension of the name Junction Creek Sandstone into the Upper Gunnison basin is appropriate and provides simplicity and clarity to the nomenclature of Jurassic units in the area. STRATIGRAPHIC RELATIONS The Upper Jurassic Junction Creek Sandstone is exposed in southwestern Colorado and reaches 300 to 500 feet thick at the type area near Durango, Colorado. The Junction Creek was informally divided into three units in the Four Corners area near Ute Mountain, Colorado, by Ekren and Houser (1965). Their lower unit is 40 feet of reddish-orange, fine to medium grained sandstone, with alternating flat-bedded and cross-stratified cosets. Laterally extensive horizontally-stratified beds are characteristic of this unit. The middle unit consists of 250 feet of pink to orange, fine to medium grained sandstone. Coarse grains and chert pebbles are commonly concentrated on bedding planes. This unit is thick bedded with very large scale cross-stratification. The middle unit thins eastward in the subsurface. The upper unit is grayish-red, fine grained, argillaceous sandstone consisting of thin to medium horizontal beds. This unit is irregular in thickness, but 30 feet was measured by Ekren and Houser (1965). The Junction Creek Sandstone thins northward to about 25 feet near Dunton, Colorado north of the La Plata Mountains (O’Sullivan, 1992). The Junction Creek Sandstone is equivalent to the Bluff Sandstone Member of the Morrison Formation, which is recognized in Utah, Arizona, and New Mexico (Figure 1). Use of dual nomenclature is unfortunate, but arose before the extensive network of well logs made subsurface correlations possible. The Bluff/Junction Creek laterally interfingers with both the Tidwell and Salt Wash Members of the Morrison Formation (O’Sullivan, 1995). The lower contact of the Junction Creek with Jurassic Wanakah Formation is defined by the J-5 Unconformity. The Morrison Formation overlies the Bluff/Junction Creek Sandstone region-wide. DEPOSITIONAL SETTING During the earliest deposition of the Morrison Formation, the Sundance Seaway extended south through Wyoming and into southern parts of Utah and Colorado (Turner and Peterson, 1998). As the seaway retreated, streams that drained highlands to the west of the depositional basin carried gravel, sand, and mud eastward forming an extensive alluvial plain (Figure 2). These deposits are the Salt Wash Member of the Morrison Formation. In central Colorado, remnants of the ancestral Rocky Mountains consisted of scattered low hills drained by small and likely intermittent streams that were unrelated to the Salt Wash system. During times when streams in the Colorado Plateau region were dry, winds from the south and west removed sediment from the dry stream beds and deposited it downwind to the north forming extensive dune fields in the Four Corners region (Turner and Peterson, 1998). Deflation of previously deposited shallow marine sands was also likely contributor of sediment to the eolian systems. These eolian deposits are represented today by the Bluff and Junction Creek Sandstones. NEW STRATIGRAPHIC INTERPRETATIONS OF THE JURASSIC “JUNCTION CREEK SANDSTONE,” UPPER GUNNISON BASIN, COLORADO Casey G. Dick, Department of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Western State College of Colorado, Gunnison, CO 81230 JUNCTION CREEK IN THE GUNNISON AREA Outcrops of red to white, fine grained, flat-bedded to large scale cross- stratified sandstone line road cuts and creek beds in the area surrounding Gunnison, Colorado (Figure 3). These resistant beds form cliffs and steep slopes over 60 feet high in some locations. The sandstone bodies lie nonconformably atop uplifted Proterozoic basement rocks and underlie the Jurassic Morrison Formation (Figure 4) . The underlying nonconformity is thought to be related to coalescing of several major Jurassic unconformities due to the thinning of sedimentary units onlapping the ancestral Rocky Mountain uplift. Although the Junction Creek is only sporadically exposed in the Gunnison area, marker beds persistent in several measured sections suggest lateral continuity between the units during deposition. Two distinct units within the Junction Creek, an “upper” and “lower”, are recognized in the area. The lower unit consists of grey to red, siltstone to fine grained sandstone. Bedding is typically thin and horizontal with abundant wavy laminations and symmetrical ripples. Shaley siltstone beds are also common within the lower unit. A marker bed near the top of the lower unit consisting of a grey-red-green shale succession is present at several localities. The upper unit consists of light tan to red, fine grained sandstone. This unit is dominated by large scale (0.5 m – 2 m) planar-tabular cross-stratification. Paleocurrent data, from the Gunnison area, suggest a transport direction of eolian sediments to the north. Coarse sand and chert pebbles are concentrated along bedding planes near the bottom of the upper unit at some localities. Exposures of the upper unit reach 40 to 50 feet thick near Gunnison.
Transcript
Page 1: NEW STRATIGRAPHIC INTERPRETATIONS OF THE JURASSIC ... · to the eolian systems. These eolian deposits are represented today by the Bluff and Junction Creek Sandstones. NEW STRATIGRAPHIC

Figure 2. Paleogeographic map of the western U.S. during theLate Jurassic when the Bluff/Junction Creek Sandstone was beingdeposited as dunes migrated northeast through Colorado.From Peterson, 1994.

“UPPER UNIT”

“LOWER UNIT”

Figure 3. Typical Junction Creek outcrop in the Gunnison area.Yellow line marks approximate position of the contact between the “lower”flat-bedded unit and “upper” cross-stratified unit. Note that highway liesdirectly on the contact of Proterozoic basement rocks.

Metamorphic basement

Mor

rison

Form

atio

n

Salt WashMember

JunctionCreekSandstone

Brushy BasinMember

Burro CanyonFormation Cretaceous

Jurassic

Figure 4. Stratigraphic column showing membersof the Jurassic Morrison Formation in theUpper Gunnison basin, Colorado. Overlying andunderlying units as well as unconformities arealso shown.

Nonconformity

Proterozoic

Wanakah Formation

Mor

rison

Form

atio

n

TidwellMember

Salt WashMember Bluff/

JunctionCreekSandstone

Recapture Member

Westwater CanyonMember

Brushy BasinMember

Burro CanyonFormation

J-5 Unconformity

CretaceousJurassic

Figure 1. Stratigraphic column showing membersof the Jurassic Morrison Formation in theFour Corners region. Overlying and underlyingunits as well as unconformities are also shown.

A. B.

C. D.

Figure 5. Photographs of sedimentary features within the Junction Creek Sandstone in the Gunnison, Colorado area.A.) Symmetrical ripple marks near bottom of lower unit. B.) Coarse sand grains and chert lags along bedding planeat bottom of upper unit. C.) Contact between “lower” flat bedded silty sandstone and “upper” large scale cross stratifiedsandstone. D.) Cross-stratified dune-form within “upper” unit.

1m

ABSTRACTA Jurassic sandstone that commonly overlies Proterozoic basementcrops out in discrete locations around Gunnison, Colorado, formingmassive red to tan cliffs and hoodoos. The sandstone locallyunderlies the Salt Wash Member of the Morrison Formation. Ongoingcontroversy over the nomenclature of several Jurassic units on theColorado Plateau, coupled with the absence of lower Jurassic strataon the uplifted Uncompahgre highlands has resulted in ambiguity ofstratigraphic relations for several units in the region. This particularJurassic sandstone has been referred to as the Junction CreekSandstone, the Junction Creek Sandstone Member of the WanakahFormation, or an eolian unit within the Tidwell Member of the MorrisonFormation. The Junction Creek Sandstone was named as a memberof the Morrison Formation for exposures between Junction Creek andthe Animas River in La Plata County, Colorado (Goldman andSpencer,1941). Two separate units within the member were initiallynoted, a lower horizontally banded part, and an upper, large-scalecross-stratified part. Thick cross-bedded sandstone sets in theJunction Creek are indicative of eolian dune deposition, whereas, thethin flat-laminated beds suggest interdunal or local sabkha deposition.Hansen (1968) mapped the eolian sandstone that overlies andunderlies unnamed parts of the Wanakah, as the Junction CreekMember of the Wanakah Formation in the Smith Fork area of theBlack Ridge quadrangle, Gunnison County, Colorado. O’Sullivan(1992a) points out that the name Junction Creek Sandstone has notbeen applied to the same stratigraphic interval everywhere andsuggests that extension of the name into the Gunnison County area istenuous. O’Sullivan (1992b) redesignated units previously mapped asthe Junction Creek Sandstone, in the Black Canyon area as an eolianfacies contained within the upper beds of the Tidwell Member of theMorrison Formation. Detailed study of units mapped as JunctionCreek Sandstone in the upper Gunnison basin, Colorado, suggeststhat these units lie in the same stratigraphic position and are of thesame lithology as the type Junction Creek. Based on the findings ofthis study, extension of the name Junction Creek Sandstone into theUpper Gunnison basin is appropriate and provides simplicity andclarity to the nomenclature of Jurassic units in the area.

STRATIGRAPHIC RELATIONSThe Upper Jurassic Junction Creek Sandstone is exposed insouthwestern Colorado and reaches 300 to 500 feet thick at the typearea near Durango, Colorado. The Junction Creek was informallydivided into three units in the Four Corners area near Ute Mountain,Colorado, by Ekren and Houser (1965). Their lower unit is 40 feet ofreddish-orange, fine to medium grained sandstone, with alternatingflat-bedded and cross-stratified cosets. Laterally extensivehorizontally-stratified beds are characteristic of this unit. The middleunit consists of 250 feet of pink to orange, fine to medium grainedsandstone. Coarse grains and chert pebbles are commonlyconcentrated on bedding planes. This unit is thick bedded with verylarge scale cross-stratification. The middle unit thins eastward in thesubsurface. The upper unit is grayish-red, fine grained, argillaceoussandstone consisting of thin to medium horizontal beds. This unit isirregular in thickness, but 30 feet was measured by Ekren and Houser(1965). The Junction Creek Sandstone thins northward to about 25feet near Dunton, Colorado north of the La Plata Mountains(O’Sullivan, 1992).

The Junction Creek Sandstone is equivalent to the Bluff SandstoneMember of the Morrison Formation, which is recognized in Utah,Arizona, and New Mexico (Figure 1). Use of dual nomenclature isunfortunate, but arose before the extensive network of well logs madesubsurface correlations possible. The Bluff/Junction Creek laterallyinterfingers with both the Tidwell and Salt Wash Members of theMorrison Formation (O’Sullivan, 1995). The lower contact of theJunction Creek with Jurassic Wanakah Formation is defined by the J-5Unconformity. The Morrison Formation overlies the Bluff/JunctionCreek Sandstone region-wide.

DEPOSITIONAL SETTINGDuring the earliest deposition of the Morrison Formation, theSundance Seaway extended south through Wyoming and intosouthern parts of Utah and Colorado (Turner and Peterson, 1998). Asthe seaway retreated, streams that drained highlands to the west ofthe depositional basin carried gravel, sand, and mud eastward formingan extensive alluvial plain (Figure 2). These deposits are the SaltWash Member of the Morrison Formation. In central Colorado,remnants of the ancestral Rocky Mountains consisted of scattered lowhills drained by small and likely intermittent streams that wereunrelated to the Salt Wash system. During times when streams in theColorado Plateau region were dry, winds from the south and westremoved sediment from the dry stream beds and deposited itdownwind to the north forming extensive dune fields in the FourCorners region (Turner and Peterson, 1998). Deflation of previouslydeposited shallow marine sands was also likely contributor of sedimentto the eolian systems. These eolian deposits are represented today bythe Bluff and Junction Creek Sandstones.

NEW STRATIGRAPHIC INTERPRETATIONS OF THE JURASSIC “JUNCTION CREEK SANDSTONE,”UPPER GUNNISON BASIN, COLORADO

Casey G. Dick, Department of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Western State College of Colorado, Gunnison, CO 81230

JUNCTION CREEK IN THE GUNNISON AREAOutcrops of red to white, fine grained, flat-bedded to large scale cross-stratified sandstone line road cuts and creek beds in the areasurrounding Gunnison, Colorado (Figure 3). These resistant bedsform cliffs and steep slopes over 60 feet high in some locations. Thesandstone bodies lie nonconformably atop uplifted Proterozoicbasement rocks and underlie the Jurassic Morrison Formation (Figure4) . The underlying nonconformity is thought to be related tocoalescing of several major Jurassic unconformities due to the thinningof sedimentary units onlapping the ancestral Rocky Mountain uplift.Although the Junction Creek is only sporadically exposed in theGunnison area, marker beds persistent in several measured sectionssuggest lateral continuity between the units during deposition. Twodistinct units within the Junction Creek, an “upper” and “lower”, arerecognized in the area.

The lower unit consists of grey to red, siltstone to fine grainedsandstone. Bedding is typically thin and horizontal with abundantwavy laminations and symmetrical ripples. Shaley siltstone beds arealso common within the lower unit. A marker bed near the top of thelower unit consisting of a grey-red-green shale succession is presentat several localities.

The upper unit consists of light tan to red, fine grained sandstone.This unit is dominated by large scale (0.5 m – 2 m) planar-tabularcross-stratification. Paleocurrent data, from the Gunnison area,suggest a transport direction of eolian sediments to the north. Coarsesand and chert pebbles are concentrated along bedding planes nearthe bottom of the upper unit at some localities. Exposures of the upperunit reach 40 to 50 feet thick near Gunnison.

Page 2: NEW STRATIGRAPHIC INTERPRETATIONS OF THE JURASSIC ... · to the eolian systems. These eolian deposits are represented today by the Bluff and Junction Creek Sandstones. NEW STRATIGRAPHIC

Locations of measured sections

From Gunnison Basin Public Lands Map, National Forest Service, 2002

Figure 6. Base map of study area, Gunnison County, Colorado.

Regional Marker Bed

N18W

N21E

N0W

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThis study was funded through Western State College of Colorado by thedonors to the Bartleson-Prather Scholarship for Research in Geology.

Dr. Robert P. Fillmore served as advisor and motivational consultant for thisproject.

PROBLEMSDue to the northward thinning of the Junction Creek along with theirregularity in its distribution, there has been skepticism on the part ofsome workers as to the validity of the correlation of Junction Creek inthe Gunnison area with that of the type area. Hansen (1968) firstextended the name Junction Creek Sandstone to the north of the typearea near Durango, Colorado, into the Black Canyon of the Gunnison.Use of the name has been extended further eastward into theGunnison, Colorado area by several other workers in the mapping ofgeological quadrangles (e.g., Coogan and others, 2005).

Haynes and others (1972) mapped a northward pinchout of theJunction Creek along the Dolores River about 20 miles southeast ofDove Creek. O’Sullivan (1992) noted that the sandstone thinsnorthward from 120 feet thick to a likely pinchout just north of thesettlement of Piedra, Colorado, over a distance of 9 miles. O’Sullivan(1992) recognizes the use of the name to the north of the pinchoutnear Placerville, Colorado, but assigns the lower, even-bedded, stratato the Tidwell Member of the Morrison Formation. However, he statesthat “the sandstone along the Gunnison River east of Curecanti Creekis far to the north of the known distribution of typical Junction CreekSandstone.” Based on the documented northward thinning of thesandstone along with the obscured geologic record between the twoareas, O’Sullivan (1992) states that, “extension of the name JunctionCreek Sandstone into the Gunnison area seems tenuous”, and that,“the sandstone might better be recognized as an extensive lentil ofMorrison age of, as yet, uncertain correlation.” Nonetheless, use ofthe name continues to appear in published geological maps of theUpper Gunnison basin (Coogan and others, 2005).

CONCLUSIONSIt is recognized that obscurities in the geologic record in the regionbetween the type area of Junction Creek Sandstone and the studyarea do not permit direct correlation of the rock units in question.However, compilation of several, less direct, indicators suggest thatcorrelation is possible. Subunits of the Junction Creek Sandstone asdescribed by Eckren and Houser (1965) prove to be very similar inlithology to those documented in the Gunnison area. For instance, thesuccession from lower flat-bedded fine grained sandstone to theupper large-scale, cross-stratified, eolian sandstone containing coarsesand and chert pebbles on bedding planes is documented inexposures both in, southwesternmost Colorado, as well as, inGunnison area. Paleocurrent results from this study concur withTurner and Peterson’s (1998) interpretations of depositionalmechanisms of the Junction Creek in the Four Corners area. The typeJunction Creek and Bluff Sandstone directly overlies the J-5unconformity. A similar relationship is expressed in the Gunnison areaby the nonconformity between the Junction Creek and underlyingProterozoic basement rocks. It is quite likely that this nonconformity isthe upland expression of several coalesced Jurassic unconformities,including the J-5 (Figure 7). Type Junction Creek as well as that in thestudy area are both documented as interfingering with, and underlyinglower members of the Morrison Formation. Outcrops of JunctionCreek Sandstone in the Gunnison area are locally continuous anddistinctly mapable units, therefore, the unit must be named. To assignthis unit with a new name would be misleading and ambiguous, andwould further complicate the issue. Based on the findings of this study,extension of the name Junction Creek Sandstone into the UpperGunnison basin is appropriate and provides simplicity and clarity tothe nomenclature of Jurassic units in the area.

N10E

Marker Sequence

Junction Creek SS

Unconformities

Figure 7. Diagramatic cross-section of Mesozoic units, Grand Junction toCanon City, Colorado. Note stratigraphic position of Junction Creekin Gunnison area relative to various unconformities.From Bartleson and Jensen, 1988.

J-5

REFERENCESBartleson, B.L., and Jensen, J.A., 1988, The oldest (?) Morrison Formation Dinosaur,

Gunnison, Colorado: The Mountain Geologist, v. 25, p. 129.

Coogan, J.C., Stork, A.L., Fillmore, R.P., 2005, Geologic map of the Almont quadrangle,Gunnison County, Colorado: Colorado Geologic Survey Open-File Report 05-5.

Eckren, E.B., and Houser, F.N., 1965, Geology and petrology of the Ute Mountain area,Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 481, 74 p.

Hansen, W.R., 1968, Geologic map of the Black Ridge quadrangle, Delta and MontroseCounties, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Quadrangle Map, GQ-747.

Haynes, D.D., Vogel, J.D., and Wyant, D.G., 1972, Geology, structure, and uraniumdeposits of the Cortez quadrangle, Colorado and Utah: U.S. Geological SurveyMiscellaneous Geologic Investigations Map, I-629.

O'Sullivan, R.B., 1992, Jurassic Wanakah and Morrison Formations in the Telluride-Ouray-western Black Canyon area of southwestern Colorado: U.S. GeologicalSurvey Bulletin, 1927, 24 p.

O'Sullivan, R.B., 1995, Correlation of Middle Jurassic and related rocks from Slick Rockto Salter Canyon in southwestern Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Oil and GasInvestigations Chart, OC-144.

Peterson, F., 1994, Sand dunes, sabkhas, streams, and shallow seas: Jurassicpaleogeography in the southern part of the Western Interior basin, in Caputo,M.V., Peterson, J.A., and Franczyk, K.J., eds., Mesozoic Systems of the RockyMountain Region, USA, p. 233-273.

Turner, C.E., and Peterson, F., 1998, Late Jurassic ecosystem reconstruction in theWestern Interior of the United States; in, Santucci, V.L., and McClelland, L.,(eds.), National Park Service Paleontological Research: National Park Service,Geologic Resources Division Technical Report, NPS/NRGRD/GRDTR-98/01, p.158-162.


Recommended