+ All Categories
Home > Documents > News- pEscaRa letter N°3fontanellesambuceto.comune.pescara.it/wp-content/uploads/2014/1… ·...

News- pEscaRa letter N°3fontanellesambuceto.comune.pescara.it/wp-content/uploads/2014/1… ·...

Date post: 28-Jun-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
5
Today USER is making progress as a working group of cities focused on and engaged in “achieving suc- cessful public spaces”. Public spaces are the realm of citizenship - where people meet and interact. The USER cities are convinced that successful public spaces are convivial, acces- sible, safe, interactive and multifunc- tional places where people reinforce the feeling of belonging and the sense of community. The two thematic seminars already held in Copenhagen (April) and Riga (July) were a valuable opportunity to discuss, exchange and learn to- gether about uses and users of pu- blic spaces with a view to achieving good public spaces. Striving for suc- cessful public spaces entails several challenges: among other things, new conflicts between different catego- ries of users with different interests will emerge and new dilemmas may appear. The Riga thematic seminar was a wonderful opportunity to dis- cuss “safer public spaces” and how to handle the dilemma between controlled and open public spaces. At the same time, USER is making progress with “local trials” in each city, where the methodological is- sues become very relevant: how pu- blic spaces are currently used, who uses them, how we identify malfunc- tions and conflicts in public spaces, how to involve users in finding solu- tions, what kind of solutions should be developed, etc. The cities have already launched their local support groups, involving different catego- ries of stakeholders and users. Preparing for the three city workshops is now the main activity within USER. Over the next mon- ths, the workshops will give USER partners an opportunity to deepen their experience-sharing by compa- ring their respective local strategies and the processes for drawing up their local action plans Fernando Barreiro, lead expert of USER project EDITO NEWS- LETTER N°3 OCTOBER 2013 01 05 Lublin. New uses experimentation on USER pilot sites PESCARA
Transcript
Page 1: News- pEscaRa letter N°3fontanellesambuceto.comune.pescara.it/wp-content/uploads/2014/1… · Pescara and Copenhagen - took part in the session. After the initial session in April

Today USER is making progress as a working group of cities focused on and engaged in “achieving suc-cessful public spaces”. Public spaces are the realm of citizenship - where people meet and interact. The USER cities are convinced that successful public spaces are convivial, acces-sible, safe, interactive and multifunc-tional places where people reinforce the feeling of belonging and the sense of community.

The two thematic seminars already held in Copenhagen (April) and Riga (July) were a valuable opportunity to discuss, exchange and learn to-gether about uses and users of pu-blic spaces with a view to achieving

good public spaces. Striving for suc-cessful public spaces entails several challenges: among other things, new conflicts between different catego-ries of users with different interests will emerge and new dilemmas may appear. The Riga thematic seminar was a wonderful opportunity to dis-cuss “safer public spaces” and how to handle the dilemma between controlled and open public spaces.

At the same time, USER is making progress with “local trials” in each city, where the methodological is-sues become very relevant: how pu-blic spaces are currently used, who uses them, how we identify malfunc-tions and conflicts in public spaces,

how to involve users in finding solu-tions, what kind of solutions should be developed, etc. The cities have already launched their local support groups, involving different catego-ries of stakeholders and users.

Preparing for the three city workshops is now the main activity within USER. Over the next mon-ths, the workshops will give USER partners an opportunity to deepen their experience-sharing by compa-ring their respective local strategies and the processes for drawing up their local action plans

Fernando Barreiro, lead expert of USER project

Edito

News-letter N°3octoBER 2013

0105

Lublin. New uses experimentation on USER pilot sites

pEscaRa

Page 2: News- pEscaRa letter N°3fontanellesambuceto.comune.pescara.it/wp-content/uploads/2014/1… · Pescara and Copenhagen - took part in the session. After the initial session in April

THE EUROPEAN USER PROJECT - NEwSlETTER N°3

What’s nEW in UsER?The USER project is entering a new phase!

0205

Riga. Riflemen square, USER pilot site

16 14 21

octoBER novEmBER novEmBER

lUBlin : poland

krakow : poland

pEscaRa : italy

17 15 22

thE FiRst WoRkshops Will takE placE in aUtUmn in thE FolloWing citiEs:

After the first two thematic seminars, the nine USER project cities will now meet in subgroups of three ci-ties to work on comparable public spaces. This means holding three parallel meetings, on three separate occa-sions during the project. Each USER city will host its two partner cities for a workshop !

the aim of these workshops is for the cities to :

› Get to know the other cities’ pilot sites and understand the issues they are addressing;

› Share their experience in a targeted way, based on the practices observed and the requirements, in a peer re-view approach;

› Discuss how they go about constructing their local ac-tion plan, take advantage of the other cities’ viewpoints and advice, and draw inspiration from the partner cities’ experience to enhance their own action plan.

Page 3: News- pEscaRa letter N°3fontanellesambuceto.comune.pescara.it/wp-content/uploads/2014/1… · Pescara and Copenhagen - took part in the session. After the initial session in April

THE EUROPEAN USER PROJECT - NEwSlETTER N°3

0305

lEssons lEaRnEd FRom thE UsER nEtWoRkThe Riga seminar gathered USER partners together to discuss «safer public spaces».

Safety in public spaces is usually understood in terms of policing, i.e. safety from physical assault, video surveillance and the presence of police officers. But the USER project wants to go further and look at the feeling of insecurity that users can experience in public spaces, whether or not there are objec-tive grounds for that feeling. How do we design public spaces in which users will not feel afraid? What uses should we support so that public spaces are conducive to socializing, and not a source of anxiety? These are the questions that were discussed at the second thematic seminar in Riga, which revolved around the presentation by Paul Landauer, a French architect specialised in safety in open spaces.

The feeling of insecurity influences people’s behaviour and whether or not they want to use a public space.

To make people feel safe, the urban aspect and the human aspect are in-tertwined. A public space that is poorly maintained, confined or, on the contrary, too exposed is a source of anxiety. Similarly, a well-used public space in which people socialize is often a public space that works well. We need to address both of these aspects to make users feel safe, and not consi-der only the material aspect, as is often the case.

We have to strike the right balance between the objective need to make spaces safe, the need to keep them attractive even so, and the need to make users feel more responsible for the way public spaces are used. The photos below illustrate this problem.

Walking diagnoSiSParticipants were able to apply the observation method known as a «walking diagnosis». This is a me-thod used to observe, on the spot, how a particular location is used and how the location could be im-proved, and to build a diagnosis that all of the stakeholders agree on.The purpose of a walking diagnosis is «to learn to see together». In a public space, for example, the aim is to gather local residents, users, public space managers, public poli-cy-makers, elected representatives, etc. in order to observe the public space together. Their observation

can focus on: how the spaces are designed and equipped, the urban atmospheres; management of ur-ban space, housing and facilities; uses, practices, signs of social life, etc.During the visit, participants each note their observations on an ob-servation grid.They then discuss their observa-tions and build a shared diagnosis of the site’s improvement points and potential. Because it was drawn up collectively, this shared diagno-sis proves to be a very solid basis for designing actions in the future.

Malaga. Can the image of insecurity conveyed by the damaged building facades be rectified by making the owner-inhabitants feel more res-ponsible?

Istambul  : the way the benches are laid out in public spaces is a way of controlling social interaction and whether people stop in the space: when benches are scarce, there is little social interaction and people do not stay long. How many benches should there be, and how should they be laid out to ensure that a pu-blic space works well from a social viewpoint?

Copenhagen. «Eyes on the street» (Jane Jacobs): the feeling of safety in an open space also depends on the fact that people can see what is going on in the street, especially from neighbouring buildings.

An over-emphasis on safety: is over-regulating usage likely to res-trict and discourage usage and social interaction? How can we make users feel more responsible for how public spaces are used, instead of relying on physical measures?

The overwhelming conclusion of the discussions at the Riga seminar was that we should first think about how to get people to use public space together, instead of immediately thinking of physical measures to make it safer.

Page 4: News- pEscaRa letter N°3fontanellesambuceto.comune.pescara.it/wp-content/uploads/2014/1… · Pescara and Copenhagen - took part in the session. After the initial session in April

THE EUROPEAN USER PROJECT - NEwSlETTER N°3

URBact pRogRammE EvEnts

0405

URBaCT Summer University

Four USER project cities and the lead expert took part in the URBACT Summer University held from 28 to 30 August in Dublin, Ireland.

A total of 300 people from 150 cities and 26 countries gathered to discuss urban planning policies, with input from experts, and work on methods for constructing local action plans (based on a simulation of a Local Support Group in the fictional city of Allium).

The summer university is an excellent way for the cities to step back and take a critical look at their own practices, think about the activities of the Local Sup-port Group, and take full advantage of the methodological input from URBACT.

TRaining SESSion foR ElECTEd REpRESEnTaTivES

URBACT ran its second training session for elected representa-tives in Brussels on 16 and 17 Sep-tember.

Elected representatives from four USER project member cities - Grenoble-Alpes Métropole, Riga, Pescara and Copenhagen - took part in the session. After the initial session in April on the integrated approach, this time the elected re-

presentatives worked on the par-ticipatory approach (i.e. involving the stakeholders) and social inno-vation.

Support from local elected repre-sentatives is essential to ensure the solidity of the local action plan, and their active participation in this training session shows that the USER project can count on their backing !

Here is some feedback from UrBACt partners who attended :

«  It was a wonderful experience to know the opinions of other people - experts in city planning and manage-ment. What was really surprising was that many of us found similar solutions to Allium’s public space problems, but the ways to achieve the goal in many cases were different. It was an ama-zing experience. »

Monika Klos, Lublin

« My main conclusion after the UR-BACT Summer University is that Riga has not yet experienced such bene-ficial, intensive stakeholder involve-ment. It is vital to involve all stakehol-ders as well as users of public spaces in the early stages of planning pro-cesses. And we have to remember that all our efforts and work to create more lively, convivial and interesting public places must address the needs of the people using the public spaces, especially those which are important for the local community. »

Ilze Rudzate, Riga

Dublin Trinity College. Photo credit: URBACT programme.

Page 5: News- pEscaRa letter N°3fontanellesambuceto.comune.pescara.it/wp-content/uploads/2014/1… · Pescara and Copenhagen - took part in the session. After the initial session in April

THE EUROPEAN USER PROJECT - NEwSlETTER N°3

0505

« USER in pESCaRa »

La Città di Pescara nell’ambito del network tematico USER ha scelto di approfondire alcune delle questioni urbane contenute nel Piano Fonta-nelle-Sambuceto, progetto di Rigene-razione Urbana all’interno del sistema metropolitano Chieti-Pescara.

L’area di intervento Fontanelle-Sam-buceto si estende su una zona di 100 ettari, in adiacenza all’aeroporto d’Abruzzo e collocata nel baricentro di uno dei principali distretti econo-mici del centro Italia e dalle aree ter-ritoriali più importanti della Regione Abruzzo.

Il Piano di Rigenerazione Urbana Fon-tanelle-Sambuceto prevede un mix di interventi volti a favorire il rilancio dell’area attraverso la connessione di spazi pubblici, aree verdi e attrezza-ture private di uso pubblico, la proget-tazione sostenibile degli insediamenti, la partecipazione e il coinvolgimento della popolazione nel processo deci-sionale, il rilancio delle economie lo-cali.

Il Piano di Azione Locale sviluppa-to dalla Città di Pescara nell’am-bito del Progetto USER consentirà di approfondire una delle azioni progettuali indivi-duate dallo Studio urbanistico Fonta-nelle-Sambuceto. Il Progetto USER rappresenta quindi una straordinaria occasione per prose-guire il lavoro svolto e approfondire alcune tematiche nodali all’interno di un quadro di strategie complessive messo a punto precedentemente.

Nello specifico, il Progetto USER rap-presenta un valore aggiunto per il pro-cesso di rigenerazione urbana Fonta-nelle-Sambuceto poiché consentirà la progettazione della cosiddetta Green Spine, ossia una vera e propria “spi-na dorsale verde” composta da aree verdi ed attrezzature per il tempo li-bero. Attraverso il dialogo e la coope-

razione tra gli stakeholder e tramite un processo di partecipazione volto a comprendere meglio le esigenze dei City Users e a tradurle in indirizzi pro-gettuali, si individueranno i fabbisogni degli utilizzatori degli spazi e delle attrezzature. Seguiranno la progetta-zione di dettaglio degli spazi verdi e le realizzazioni sperimentali. Queste ultime consentiranno la realizzazione di uno spazio pubblico low cost au-tocostruito e autogestito, attraverso l’uso di materiali di riciclo e l’impiego di lavoratori socialmente utili.

DIr

 : Gr

en

ob

le

-al

pe

s m

ét

ro

po

le

- Co

nC

ep

tIo

n G

ra

ph

Iqu

e : w

ww

.la

-mIn

e.C

om

- oC

to

br

e 2

013

contactsGrenoble-alpes métropole (lead partner) : › Claire PREDAL, +33 56 58 51 73 [email protected]

› Fernando BARREIRO (lead Expert), + 34 93 200 27 15 [email protected]

CopenhaGen : Sia BOESEN, +45 326 302 90 [email protected]

DresDen : Bruno BULS +49 35 14 88 35 09 [email protected]

krakow : Natalia BIERNAT +48 692 185 566 [email protected]

lIsbon : Miguel BRITO +35 213 227 360 [email protected]

lublIn : Monika KLOS +48 814 662 850 [email protected]

malaGa : Begona OLIVA +34 951 928 833 [email protected]

pesCara : Cinzia LIBERATORE +39 33 96 26 77 05 [email protected]

rIGa : Nika KOTOVIKA +37 167 181 424 [email protected]


Recommended