+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Next Gen sequencing - Denver, · PDF file1/26/15 1 Genome mapping Genome sequencing & Next Gen...

Next Gen sequencing - Denver, · PDF file1/26/15 1 Genome mapping Genome sequencing & Next Gen...

Date post: 19-Mar-2018
Category:
Upload: vandan
View: 227 times
Download: 5 times
Share this document with a friend
10
1/26/15 1 Genome mapping Genome sequencing Next Gen sequencing Cytogene(c Band 510 Mb YACs ~1 Mb BACs ~150 Kb STS mapping fingerprint mapping Human Genome Gene9c Map “Sequenceready” BAC map Genome mapping Genome sequencing Next Gen sequencing 1977 - 2003
Transcript

1/26/15  

1  

Genome mapping �

Genome sequencing �

Next Gen sequencing �

Cytogene(c  Band  5-­‐10  Mb  

YACs  ~1  Mb  

BACs  ~150  Kb  

STS  mapping  

fingerprint  mapping  

Human  Genome    Gene9c  Map  

“Sequence-­‐ready”    BAC  map  

Genome mapping �

Genome sequencing �

Next Gen sequencing �1977 - 2003 �

1/26/15  

2  

F.  Sanger,  S.  Nicklen,  and  A.  R.  Coulson,  Proc  Natl  Acad  Sci  U  S  A.  1977;  74:  5463–5467    

 

1/26/15  

3  

SCIENCE    VOL.  274    25  OCTOBER  1996  

11  DECEMBER  1998  VOL  282  SCIENCE  

SCIENCE  VOL  287  24  MARCH  2000  

1/26/15  

4  

15  February  2001  

3  GB  “dra_”    

sequence  

NATURE  |VOL  421  |  6  FEBRUARY  2003  

3,000  Mbp   “finished”  

F.  Sanger,  S.  Nicklen,  and  A.  R.  Coulson,  Proc  Natl  Acad  Sci  U  S  A.  1977;  74:  5463–5467    

 

Detec(on  of  Fluorescently  Tagged  DNA  

Output  to  Computer  

Op(cal    Detec(on  System  

Eric  Green,  NHGRI  

G  

G  

A  

A  

A  

T  

T  

T  C  

C  C  C  

5’-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  ACTAGTCCCATGdd3’              

5’-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  ACTAGTCCCATdd3’  5’  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  ACTAGTCCCAdd3’  

5’  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  ACTAGTCCdd3’  5’  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  ACTAGTCdd3’  5’  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  ACTAGTdd3’  5’  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  ACTAGdd3’  

5’  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  ACTAdd3’  

5’  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  ACTdd3’  5’  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  ACdd3’  5’-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  Add3’  

5’  -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐  ACTAGTCCCdd3’  

5’TTACGATGCGGAATGACGAATH!

5’TTACGATH!

5’TTACGATGCGGaaTH!

5’TTACGATGCH!

5’TTACGATGCGGAATGACH!

5’TTACGATGCGGAATGACGAATCH  

5’TTACGATGCGH!

5’TTACGATGCGGH  

5’TTACGATGH!

5’TTACGATGCGGAATGH!

5’TTACGATGCGGAATGACGH!

5’TTACGATGCGGAAH!

5’TTACGAH!

5’TTACGATGCGGAH  

5’TTACGATGCGGAATGAH!

5’TTACGATGCGGAATGACGAH!

5’TTACGATGCGGAATGACGAAH!

1/26/15  

5  

Fluorescent  DNA  Sequencing  Data  

Eric  Green,  NHGRI   hdp://www3.appliedbiosystems.com  

hdp://www.cas.vanderbilt.edu/bsci111a/sequence-­‐analysis/tab-­‐a-­‐complete-­‐trace.gif  

hdp://www.phrap.com/phred/  

Ewing  B  et  al.  et  Green  P  Genome  Res.  1998  8:175-­‐85  PMID:  9521921  and  8:186-­‐194  PMID:  9521922  

quan9fying  sequence  accuracy  

1/26/15  

6  

hdp://www.cas.vanderbilt.edu/bsci111a/sequence-­‐analysis/tab-­‐a-­‐complete-­‐trace.gif  

>gnl|ti|2 name:G10P69425RG9.T0!10 15 9 7 7 7 4 4 4 4 9 4 0 4 0 4 4 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 6 6 4 6 6 4 0 4 6 4 4 4 6 4 0 4 6 6 4 4 0 4 6 8 12 12 8 6 4 0 4 8 6 6 6 8 8 7 7 7 9 15 15 25 28 28 33 33 33 34 34 36 36 33 30 30 26 18 18 9 7 7 12 18 18 24 24 23 23 21 21 25 26 26 26 26 26 24 33 34 24 24 24 26 26 25 23 23 20 20 20 20 33 33 40 40 26 26 26 26 30 26 38 38 38 45 45 30 33 30 30 23 23 26 26 26 26 28 45 45 45 45 45 45 41 41 41 45 45 45 37 37 40 37 37 37 37 37 37 45 45 49 49 49 49 42 34 34 34 34 34 34 42 42 42 42 42 37 37 37 40 45 23 25 21 28 28 30 45 49 45 42 40 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 33 33 33 35 35 35 42 42 42 42 40 33 33 25 22 18 23 21 23 23 42 45 51 51 42 40 42 37 37 41 51 51 51 51 51 51 39 42 30 30 30 33 33 35 40 42 42 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 51 41 43 41 40 40 33 28 28 28 29 28 33 35 35 33 33 39 41 41 45 45 45 45 49 42 42 45 45 40 42 45 45 45 49 51 51 51 51 45 45 42 42 42 37 45 30 30 30 45 45 51 45 45 45 41 41 51 45 39 32 30 30 30 30 34 45 45 45 40 40 40 42 42 42 51 51 45 45 45 41 41 39 51 51 49 49 45 45 22 22 22 36 36 39 42 42 42 42 42 42 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 49 42 35 35 35 35 35 35 45 40 40 40 42 42 42 49 45 45 51 51 45 45 49 49 45 45 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 49 49 45 45 39 39 51 51 51 51 45 41 41 41 45 45 45 45 45 51 49 49 45 45 45 45 41 41 45 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 37 33 33 33 33 33 37 45 45 45 43 41 41 40 37 33 33 33 33 33 33 40 40 37 37 37 45 41 45 45 49 49 49 45 49 49 49 45 45 41 41 41 41 45 45 49 49 49 45 45 45 45 42 38 37 37 36 34 45 49 49 49 45 40 40 40 40 40 37 37 37 45 45 45 34 34 34 34 34! F.  Sanger,  S.  Nicklen,  and  A.  R.  Coulson,  Proc  Natl  Acad  Sci  U  S  A.  1977;  74:  5463–5467

     

Fred  Sanger  2001  Nature  Med.  7:267-­‐8  

                             “It  is  a  great  source  of  joy  to                      me  that  the  dideoxy  method                    is  s9ll  the  basic  technique                    used.  It  was  perhaps  the                    climax  of  my  career  and  

makes  me  feel  that  all  our  previous  studies    on  sequences  with  their  successes  and  failures  were  not  only  enjoyable  but  also  a  worthwhile  contribu(on  to  the  future  of  medicine.”  

Cytogene(c  Band  5-­‐10  Mb  

YACs  ~1  Mb  

BACs  ~150  Kb  

ATTCATCGGTGTCGATGCTGATTAACTAGCTAGTTTACCCAA!AGTTTACCCAATACCCAATTCGATCGACCGATTCGAC!

TTCAGCTGGAATCGAATTCATCGGT!

sequence  

fragment  

“con(gs”  

assemble  

“shotgun”  clones  

~2  Kb  or  ~10  Kb  

“finishing”  

finished  sequence  

1/26/15  

7  

ATTCATCGGTGTCGATGCTGATTAACTAGCTAGTTTACCCAA!AGTTTACCCAATACCCAATTCGATCGACCGATTCGAC!

TTCAGCTGGAATCGAATTCATCGGT!

sequence  

fragment  

“con(gs”  

assemble  

“shotgun”  clones  

~2  Kb  or  ~10  Kb  

“finishing”  

finished  sequence  

Problems  with  the  shotgun  approach  

T.A.  Brown  GENOMES  2  BIOS  Scien(fic  Publishers  Ltd,  2002  

1/26/15  

8  

GATC   GATC  

“scaffold”  

10,  50  kb  inserts  

T.A.  Brown  GENOMES  2  BIOS  Scien(fic  Publishers  Ltd,  2002  

Problems  with  the  shotgun  approach  

Published by AAAS J. C. Venter et al., Science 291, 1304 -1351 (2001)

whole-human genome shotgun assembly

perfect  2X  coverage  

random  2X  coverage  

Waterston  RH,  Lander  ES,  Sulston  JE  (2002)  On  the  sequencing  of  the  human  genome.  PNAS  99:    3712-­‐16;  PNAS  100:  3022-­‐3      

50%  of  the  assembed  sequence    lies  in  con9gs  of  length  N50  or  greater  

Expecta9on  for  7X  WGS            30    kb  HGP  7X  WGS  mouse  assembly      ~24    kb  

1/26/15  

9  

Published by AAAS J. C. Venter et al., Science 291, 1304 -1351 (2001)

whole-human genome shotgun assembly

N50  =  ~86  Kb                (82  Kb  HGP)    

N50  =  ~3.6  MKb                (2.3  Mb  HGP)    

5.1X  coverage  

2X  “shred”  of  BACs  

hybrid  WGS  and  hierarchical  sequencing  

Green  ED  (2001)  Strategies  for  the  Sequencing  of  Complex  Genomes.    Nature  Reviews  Gene2cs  2:  573  PMID:  11483982  

chromosomes  

BACs   2,  10,  50  kb    fragments  

Example  •  Average  coverage  (λ)  =  5x  •  Probability  a  given  base  is  sequenced  exactly  10  (k)  9mes  is  

510e-­‐5/10!  =  0.018,    or  ~  2%  of  bases  will  have  exactly  10x  coverage.  

how  many  sequence  reads  do  we  need?  

#  of  (mes  a  given  base  is  sequenced        average  sequence  coverage  

P(k;λ)  =  (λk    e-­‐λ  )                    k!  

 

k  =  #  of  events  =  λ  =  mean  #  of  events  =  

•  If  you  sequence  at  10x  coverage  how  much  of  the  genome  will  be  sequenced  at  least  5  9mes?  

           =  1  –  probability  base  is  sequenced  <  5  9mes  =  

 

1  –  [P(0,10)  +  P(1,10)  +  P(2,10)  +  P(3,10)  +  P(4,10)]  =  0.97  

Lander  &  Waterman  GENOMICS  2,  231-­‐239  (1988)  

P(k;λ)  =  (λk    e-­‐λ  )                    k!  

 

1/26/15  

10  

hdp://www.genome.ou.edu/LanderWatermanTables1_2_3.htm   �Large-­‐scale  genome  sequence  processing�  by  M  Kasahara  &  S  Morishita  

Rela9onship  of  sequence  coverage  and  con9g  length  

(Θ  =  frac9on  of  clone  overlap  needed)  

Published by AAAS J. C. Venter et al., Science 291, 1304 -1351 (2001)

whole-human genome shotgun assembly Genome mapping �

Genome sequencing �

Next Gen sequencing �


Recommended