NFPA Technical Committee on Motor Craft (MOR-AAA) 21 ...€¦ · MOR-AAA Alan Ross Hugenot...

NFPA Technical Committee on Motor Craft (MOR-AAA) NFPA 302 Second Draft Web-meeting/Teleconference Agenda

21 August 2013 - 1:00 PM (EDT) to 4:00 PM (EDT) 1. Call to order by Chair John McDevitt at 1:00 PM. (EDT). 2. Chairman’s Remarks. John McDevitt. 3. Self-introduction of Members and Guests. For a current committee roster, see page 2. Attachment:

Committee Roster – Technical Committee on Motor Craft 4. Review and Approval of NFPA 302 First Draft Meeting Minutes (8/28/12), see page 5. Attachment:

NFPA 302 First Draft Meeting Minutes 5. Staff Liaison discussion of Second Draft meeting procedures, See Power Point, see page 8. Attachment:

NFPA 302 Second Draft Meeting Power Point 6. NFPA 302 Public Comments, see page 47. Attachments:

Memo - Review of Public Comments for the Second Revision of NFPA 302, Fire Protection Standard for Pleasure and Commercial Motor Craft

Public Comment for NFPA 302 7. Act on NFPA 302 Committee Input from First Draft Meeting (CI-31, CI-32 and CI-57), see page 65. Attachments:

Memo - Review of Committee Input for the Second Revision of NFPA 302, Fire Protection Standard for Pleasure and Commercial Motor Craft

Committee Input for NFPA 302 8. Manual of Style Equations in NFPA Documents, see page 86. Attachment:

Memo - Second Revision Recommendation - Manual of Style Equations in NFPA Documents

9. Second Draft Balloting Information - refer to Second Draft Power Point, page 8. 10. Other Business. 11. Adjournment.

Page 1 of 87

Address List No PhoneMotor Craft MOR-AAA

Lawrence Russell08/01/2013

MOR-AAA

John J. McDevitt

Chair440 Hampshire RoadDrexel Hill, PA 19026

C 4/17/2002MOR-AAA

John Adey

SecretaryAmerican Boat & Yacht Council613 Third Street, Suite 10Annapolis, MD 21403

M 10/23/2003

MOR-AAA

Larry Akins

PrincipalFireboy SystemsO-379 Lake Michigan Drive NWGrand Rapids, MI 49544

M 10/29/2012MOR-AAA

Walter Barker

PrincipalFire Safe Services, LLCN1012 County Road 557Menominee, MI 49858

M 8/9/2011

MOR-AAA

J. Emmett Bevins

PrincipalAmerex Corporation7595 Gadsden HighwayPO Box 81Trussville, AL 35173-0081Fire Equipment Manufacturers' Association

M 4/15/2004MOR-AAA

Christopher J. Bloom

PrincipalCJB Fire Consultants2654 East Gregory RoadPO Box 2611White City, OR 97503

SE 03/07/2013

MOR-AAA

David L. Bowman

PrincipalBowman Global Enterprise Group6572 SE 173rd CourtOcklawaha, FL 32179

SE 3/1/2011MOR-AAA

Philip J. Cappel

PrincipalUS Coast GuardOffice of Boating Safety (CG-54223)2100 2nd Street, SWWashington, DC 20593Alternate: Eric Johnson

E 1/17/1997

MOR-AAA

Russell Chiasson

PrincipalTrident Marine Consultants, Inc.9050 Des Roselieres, #1Brossard, QC J4X 2Y4 Canada

I 1/1/1985MOR-AAA

William A. Colavecchio

PrincipalUL LLC12 Laboratory DrivePO Box 13995Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3995

RT 7/20/2000

MOR-AAA

James Cote

PrincipalCote Marine LLC8733 NW 19th DriveCoral Springs, FL 33071

SE 03/07/2013MOR-AAA

Joseph A. Derie

PrincipalSW Passage Marine Surveys1205 SE 57th AvenuePortland, OR 97215National Association of Marine Surveyors, Inc.

I 10/29/2012

MOR-AAA

Paul V. Fleury

PrincipalMarine Services5880 Roach RidgeEarlysville, VA 22936Alternate: Sarkis Keuleyan

IM 7/16/2003MOR-AAA

Charles Fort

PrincipalBoat U.S.880 South Pickett StreetAlexandria, VA 22304

C 7/23/2008

1Page 2 of 87



MOR-AAA

E. C. Game

PrincipalE. C. Game Engineering1616 Savannah DriveAsheboro, NC 27203

SE 1/1/1987MOR-AAA

Casey O. Housley

PrincipalArmstrong Teasdale LLP2345 Grand Boulevard, Suite 2000Kansas City, MO 64108

SE 10/29/2012

MOR-AAA

Alan Ross Hugenot

PrincipalAlan Ross Hugenot, Inc.425 Burnett AvenueSan Francisco, CA 94131

IM 8/9/2011MOR-AAA

David J. LeBlanc

PrincipalTyco Fire Suppression & Building Products1467 Elmwood AvenueCranston, RI 02910

M 1/14/2005

MOR-AAA

Kim I. MacCartney

PrincipalAce Recreational Marine InsuranceMarine Advisory Services309 Fairway LaneYorktown, VA 23693-5626

I 1/1/1985MOR-AAA

David McFarlin

PrincipalTravelers Insurance CompanyPO Box 1808Manchester, CT 06045

I 10/29/2012

MOR-AAA

Larry Montgomery

PrincipalMontgomery Maritime Survey, Inc.PO Box 185Port Townsend, WA 98368-0185

SE 1/14/2005MOR-AAA

Robert E. Newsome

PrincipalNational Marine Manufacturers Association231 South LaSalle Street, Suite 2050Chicago, IL 60604

M 08/09/2012

MOR-AAA

Raymond J. Of

PrincipalRaymond Of Associates2472 Grand AvenueBellmore, NY 11710

SE 10/4/2001MOR-AAA

Donald B. Pray

PrincipalDonald B. Pray Marine Surveyor9750 Fiddler’s Green CircleRotonda West, FL 33947

SE 1/1/1992

MOR-AAA

Michael Taylor

PrincipalTaylor Marine Services Inc.167 Still River RoadHarvard, MA 01451

SE 1/1/1995MOR-AAA

Kenneth J. Weinbrecht

PrincipalOcean-Bay Marine Services, Inc.PO Box 668Yaphank, NY 11980-0668Society of Accredited Marine Surveyors

I 4/1/1994

MOR-AAA

Robert Yates

PrincipalRhems Volunteer Fire Department305 Forest Oaks DriveNew Bern, NC 28562

U 03/07/2013MOR-AAA

Eric Johnson

AlternateUS Coast Guard2100 Second Street, SWWashington, DC 20593Principal: Philip J. Cappel

E 10/29/2012

2Page 3 of 87



MOR-AAA

Sarkis Keuleyan

AlternateSeatec Marine Systems4900 Bears Bluff Rd.Wadmalaw Island, SC 29487Principal: Paul V. Fleury

IM 10/29/2012MOR-AAA

Lawrence Russell

Staff LiaisonNational Fire Protection Association1 Batterymarch ParkQuincy, MA 02169-7471

1/6/2005

3Page 4 of 87

MOR-AAA 8-2012 FIRST DRAFT Meeting Minutes / Page 1

NFPA Technical Committee on Motor Craft (MOR-AAA)

NFPA 302 FIRST DRAFT MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, August 28, 2012, 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.

NFPA Headquarters, Quincy, Massachusetts

1. Call to Order. The meeting was called to order at 8:06 AM (EDT) on Tuesday, August

28, 2012 by the Technical Committee Chair, John J. McDevitt at NFPA Headquarters, Quincy, MA. The purpose of the meeting was to consider and act on public input for the First Draft Report for NFPA 302, Fire Protection Standard for Pleasure and

Commercial Motor Craft.

2. Introduction of Committee Members and Guests. The Chairman made opening remarks, welcomed the Committee members and provided a safety briefing. The Chair recognized the work of past-chairman, Charlie Game as well as the following members present for their participation on the Technical Committee for Motor Craft: Kim MacCartney – 27 years Ken Weinbrecht – 18 years Michael Taylor – 17 years Philip Cappel – 15 years The passing of Member Emeritus, Robert Loeser and his contribution to the Committee was noted.

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT

NAME COMPANY

John J. McDevitt, Chair Lawrence Russell, Staff Liaison National Fire Protection Company Philip J. Cappel, Principal US Coast Guard/Office of Boating Safety Alan Ross Hugenot, Principal Alan Ross Hugenot Inc. Kim I. MacCartney, Principal Ace Recreational Marine Insurance Robert E. Newsome, Principal National Marine Manufacturers, Assoc. Michael Taylor, Principal Taylor Marine Services, Inc. Kenneth J. Weinbrecht, Principal Ocean-Bay Marine Services, Inc.

Rep: Society of Accredited Marine Surveyors

Page 5 of 87


GUESTS

NAME COMPANY

Guy R. Colonna NFPA Dave McFarlin Travelers Insurance Ed Sherman American Boat & Yacht Council

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEMBERS NOT PRESENT

NAME COMPANY

John Adey, Secretary American Boat & Yacht Council Inc. J. Emmett Bevins, Principal Amerex Corporation Russell Chiasson, Principal Trident Marine Consultants, Inc. William Colavecchio, Principal UL LLC Paul Fleury, Principal Marine Services Charles Fort, Principal Boat U.S. E.C. Game, Principal E.C. Game Engineering Gilles R. Gareau, Principal Marine Safety Ralph E. Lambrecht, Principal Independent Marine Engineer David J. LeBlanc, Principal Tyco Fire Suppression & Building Products Larry Montgomery, Principal Montgomery Maritime Survey, Inc. Raymond J. Of, Principal Raymond Of Associates Donald B. Pray, Principal Donald B. Pray Marine Surveyor

3. New Process. NFPA Division Manager, Guy Colonna addressed the members of the committee and guests, thanking them for their contributions to the NFPA Standards Development Process and explained the new engineered process for the revision of NFPA Codes and Standards. A copy of the Re-Engineering Process Training Session booklet was distributed to each member and guest.

4. Staff Liaison Report. Mr. Russell presented the applicable NFPA Regulations

Governing Committee Projects, the Annual 2014 revision cycle and the Document Information page for NFPA 302 to the meeting participants. The meeting agenda was reviewed. There was a brief discussion concerning the Fire Protection Research Foundation. Mr. Russell explained the project the Foundation supported concerning fire protection for rack stowage of boats. The Chair reported that he has submitted proposals for research and analysis of engine room fire detection and suppression on boats.

5. Approval of Prior Meeting Minutes. The minutes of the October 22, 2008 Report

on Comments teleconference were unanimously approved as issued.

6. NFPA 302 First Draft Preparation (formerly ROP). The Committee acted on twenty-four (24) Public Inputs. Forty-eight (48) First Revisions were created by the

Page 6 of 87


Committee. The Committee also generated three (3) Committee Inputs. Details of these actions can be found in the First Draft Report for NFPA 302.

7. The staff liaison explained the balloting procedures that occur following the First Draft meeting.

8. Adjournment. The meeting adjourned at16:00 PM (EDT) on Tuesday, August 28,

2012.

Page 7 of 87

NFPA Second Draft MeetingNFPA Second Draft MeetingNFPA Second Draft MeetingNFPA Second Draft Meeting

Motor CraftWelcome TC on

Motor Craft

21 August 2013 at 1:00 PM to 4:00 PM (EDT)Web meeting TeleconferenceWeb-meeting Teleconference

7/31/2013

Page 8 of 87

NFPA Second Draft MeetingNFPA Second Draft MeetingNFPA Second Draft MeetingNFPA Second Draft Meeting Members, please verify/update your p y p y

contact information. (See the roster provided with your agenda.)p y g )

Use of recording devices or other Use of recording devices or other means capable of reproducing verbatim transcriptions of this or anyverbatim transcriptions of this or any NFPA meeting is not permitted

7/31/2013

Page 9 of 87

NFPA Second Draft MeetingNFPA Second Draft MeetingNFPA Second Draft MeetingNFPA Second Draft Meeting GuestsAll guests are required to sign in and

identify their affiliations.Participation is limited to TC members or

those individuals who have previously requested time to address the committee. Other participation is granted at the discretion of the Chairdiscretion of the Chair.

7/31/2013

Page 10 of 87

NFPA Second Draft MeetingNFPA Second Draft MeetingNFPA Second Draft MeetingNFPA Second Draft MeetingMembers categorized in ANY interest gcategory who have been retained to represent the interests of ANOTHER interest category (with respect to a specific issue or issues that are to be dd d b TC/CC) h ll d laddressed by a TC/CC) shall declare

those interests to the committee and refrain from oting on an P blic Inp trefrain from voting on any Public Input, Comment, or other matter relating to those issues throughout the processthose issues throughout the process.

7/31/2013

Page 11 of 87

NFPA Second Draft MeetingNFPA Second Draft Meetinggg

General ProceduresFollow Robert’s Rules of OrderFollow Robert s Rules of Order.Discussion requires a motion.

7/31/2013

Page 12 of 87


Motions for Ending Debate gPrevious Question or “Call the Question”Not in order when another has the floorRequires a secondThis motion is not debatable and DOES NOT

automatically stop debateA 2/3 affirmative vote will immediately closeA 2/3 affirmative vote will immediately close

debate and return to the original motion on the floor. Less then 2/3 will allow debate to continue.

7/31/2013

Page 13 of 87


Committee member actions: Member addresses the chair. Receives recognition from the chair Receives recognition from the chair. Introduces the motion. A h b d h Another member seconds the

motion.

7/31/2013

Page 14 of 87

NFPA Second Draft MeetingNFPA Second Draft Meeting

Committee chair actions:Committee chair actions:States the motion.C ll f di iCalls for discussion.Ensures all issues have been heard.Takes the vote.Announces the result of the vote.

7/31/2013

Page 15 of 87

Committee on Motor CraftCommittee on Motor CraftCommittee on Motor CraftCommittee on Motor Craft 27 Members (2 Alternates) as of 7/31/13:C 2 M b (7%)Consumer: 2 Members (7%)Enforcer: 1 Member (4%) 1 AlternateInsurance: 5 Members (19%)Installer/Maintainer: 2 Members (7%) 1 AlternateManufacturer: 6 Members (22%)Research & Testing: 1 Member (4%)g ( )Special Expert: 9 Members (33%)User: 1 Members (4%) Labor: 0 Members (0%) Labor: 0 Members (0%)

If you do not have an alternate please recruit someone. Application is on the Document Information PageDocument Information Page.

7/31/2013

Page 16 of 87

NFPA Second Draft MeetingNFPA Second Draft MeetingNFPA Second Draft MeetingNFPA Second Draft MeetingTimeline

Comment Stage (Second Draft):Public Comment Closing Date: 05/03/13Second Draft Meeting TODAYSecond Draft Meeting TODAYPosting of Second Draft for Balloting Date: 11/29/13Posting of Second Draft for NITMAM: 01/03/14

Tech Session Preparation:Tech Session Preparation:NITMAM Closing Date: 02/07/14NITMAM /CAM Posting Date: 04/04/14NFPA Annual Meeting: 06/09-12/14 in Las Vegas, NV

Standards Council Issuance:Issuance of Consent Documents: 05/09/14 Issuance of Documents with CAM: 08/14/14

7/31/2013

Page 17 of 87

NFPA Second Draft MeetingNFPA Second Draft MeetingggNew Process New Process –– What’s New?What’s New?

Changes in Terms:Changes in Terms:New Term Old TermInput Stage ROP Stagep g gPublic Input Proposal

First Draft Meeting ROP Meeting“Trial Balloon”Committee Input Trial Balloon

(or later, FR that fails ballot)Committee Statement (CS) Committee Statement

C itt P l A t dFirst Revision (FR) Committee Proposal or Accepted Public Proposal

First Draft Report ROPFi D f ROP D f

7/31/2013

First Draft ROP Draft

Page 18 of 87

NFPA Second Draft MeetingNFPA Second Draft MeetingggNew Process New Process –– What’s New?What’s New?

Changes in Terms:Changes in Terms:New Term Old Term

Comment Stage ROC Stageg gPublic Comment Public Comment

Second Draft Meeting ROC MeetingComment that

Committee CommentComment that Failed Ballot

(Second Revision that failed ballot)Committee Comment or AcceptedSecond Revision Committee Comment or Accepted

Public CommentSecond Draft Report ROC

Second Draft ROC Draft

7/31/2013

Second Draft ROC Draft

Page 19 of 87


• Technical Committee Actions:

Resolving Public Comments Committee Action and Committee Statement

Creating Second RevisionsCreating Second Revisions

7/31/2013

Page 20 of 87

7/31/2013

Page 21 of 87


• Resolving Public Comments g(See Regs §4.4.8.1)Committee develops a Committee Actionp Accept Reject but See Related Second Revision Reject Reject but Hold

7/31/2013

Page 22 of 87

Accept theAccept the CommentCommentAccept the Accept the CommentComment Action: The Technical

Committee takes thisCommittee takes this Action when it decides to accept the text proposed in the Publicproposed in the Public Comment exactly as submitted.

Result: The Public Comment is marked as “Accept,” and the proposed text is incorporated into one orincorporated into one or more Second Revisions.

Page 23 of 87

Reject the Comment, but See Reject the Comment, but See R l d S d R i iR l d S d R i iRelated Second Revision. Related Second Revision.

Action: The Technical C itt t k thi A tiCommittee takes this Action when it agrees with the concept of the Public Comment in whole or in

Original comment is revised with additions and/or deletions.

part but has developed related text in one or more Second Revisions that is different from the text in thedifferent from the text in the Public Comment.

Result: The Public Comment is marked as “Reject But See” and, a reference is provided to the related Second Revision(s).

Page 24 of 87

Reject the Comment.Reject the Comment.Reject the Comment. Reject the Comment. Action: The Technical

Committee takes this Action when it disagrees with thedisagrees with the proposed changes in the Public Comment. R lt Th P bli Result: The Public Comment is marked as “Reject,” and no j ,Second Revision is developed.

Page 25 of 87

Reject But Hold the Comment.Reject But Hold the Comment.Reject But Hold the Comment. Reject But Hold the Comment. Action: The Technical

Committee takes thisCommittee takes this Action when it decides to reject the Public Comment, but hold itComment, but hold it for processing as a Public Input for the next Revision Cycle in

d i haccordance with §4.4.8.3.

Result: The Comment i k d “R j tis marked as “Reject But Hold,” and no Second Revision is developeddeveloped.

Page 26 of 87

Criteria forCriteria for Hold (Hold (§§4.4.8.3.1)4.4.8.3.1)Criteria for Criteria for Hold (Hold (§§4.4.8.3.1) 4.4.8.3.1) The Comment introduces a concept that

has not had public review by beinghas not had public review by being included in a related Input or First Revision as shown in the First Draft.

The Comment changes the text from the First Draft to the point that the Technical Committee would have to restudy theCommittee would have to restudy the text of the First Draft.

The Comment proposes something that p p gcould not be properly handled within the timeframe for processing the Second DraftDraft.

Page 27 of 87

Basis for Reject But Basis for Reject But Hold Hold ((§§4 4 8 3 2)4 4 8 3 2)((§§4.4.8.3.2) 4.4.8.3.2) The Committee may consider any y y

relevant factors including but not limited to:◦ the extent to which the Public Comment

proposes a change that is new or substantial, ◦ the complexity of the issues raised, and ◦ whether sufficient debate and public

review has taken place.

Page 28 of 87

NFPA Second Draft MeetingNFPA Second Draft Meetinggg• Committee StatementsC i l l i di fCommittee must clearly indicate reasons for not

accepting the recommendation and/or point to a relevant Second RevisionAll Public Comments Actions must have a

Committee StatementMust include a valid technical reasonMust include a valid technical reasonNo vague references to “intent”Explain how the submitter’s substantiation is

i dinadequateNeither PC Action nor Committee Statements get

balloted

7/31/2013

Page 29 of 87


• Create a Second Revision (SR)( )Committee wants to make a change (to

add, delete or modify) the First Draft.Committee develops a Committee

Statement (CS) substantiating the change. Each SR gets balloted

7/31/2013

Page 30 of 87


No “new material” after the Public Input Stage since it hasn’t had the benefit of public review.

What constitutes new material is decided by the TC or Correlating Committee. Addi “ t i l” t thi C t Adding “new material” at this Comments stage could successfully be challenged through appeal to the NFPA Standardsthrough appeal to the NFPA Standards Council

7/31/2013

Page 31 of 87


Formal voting gVoting during meeting is used to

establish a sense of agreementestablish a sense of agreement (simple majority)Secured by letter ballot (2/3Secured by letter ballot (2/3

agreement)Only the results of the formal ballotOnly the results of the formal ballot

determine the official position of the committee on the Second Draftcommittee on the Second Draft

7/31/2013

Page 32 of 87


Ballots are on the Second Revisions (SR) ONLYPublic Comments and Committee Statements notPublic Comments and Committee Statements not

ballotedReference materials are available - Second Draft Public Comments First Draft ReportSecond Draft, Public Comments, First Draft Report

Ballot form allows you to vote: Affirmative on all SRAffi ti ll SR ith ti ifi llAffirmative on all SR with exceptions specifically

noted Ballot form provides a column for affirmative

with commentwith commentNote: This box only needs to be checked if there

is an accompanying comment.R j t b t i i Reject or abstain requires a reason.

7/31/2013

Page 33 of 87


Initial ballotInitial ballot Circulation of negatives and comments Members may change votes duringMembers may change votes during

circulation Second Revision that fails letter ballot

shall be designated as a Committee Comment (in the 2nd Draft Report),

k d “R j t” d d l t d f thmarked as “Reject” and deleted from the Second Draft.

7/31/2013

Page 34 of 87

Electronic Balloting Electronic Balloting gg• Ballots will be an online format

Alt t t l d• Alternates are strongly encouraged to return ballots

• Ballot session will time out after 90 minutes

• Use “submit” to save your worky

7/31/2013

Page 35 of 87

Electronic BallotingElectronic BallotingElectronic Balloting Electronic Balloting Click link on the ballot email received Sign in with NFPA.org Committee Login and

Password

7/31/2013

Page 36 of 87

Electronic BallotingElectronic BallotingElectronic Balloting Electronic Balloting Select either Affirmative on All or

Affirmative with Exception(s)

7/31/2013

Page 37 of 87

Electronic BallotingElectronic BallotingElectronic Balloting Electronic Balloting

Use “See FR/SR - #” link to review all First/Second

Choosing AFFIRMATIVE ON ALL

Use See FR/SR # link to review all First/Second Revisions

Use “Edit election” to change individual votes or to modify vote after submitting ballotmodify vote after submitting ballot.

7/31/2013

Page 38 of 87

Electronic Balloting Electronic Balloting

Make selection: Affirmative with Comment, Negative or Abstain

Choosing AFFIRMATIVE WITH EXCEPTION(S)

Negative, or Abstain No selection made-defaults to affirmative Must include comment on each vote.

Page 39 of 87

Electronic BallotingElectronic BallotingElectronic Balloting Electronic Balloting To complete ballot click Participant p p

Consent and Submit Return and edit any votes before ballot

due date.

7/31/2013

Page 40 of 87

TC Struggles with an Issue

• TC needs data

Code Fund Lends a Hand

• TC rep and/or

Research Project Carried Out

• Funding forTC needs data on a new technology or emerging issue

• Two opposing

TC rep and/or staff liaison submits a Code Fund Request

• Requests are

Funding for project is provided by the Code Fund and/or industry sponsors• Two opposing

views on an issue with no real data

• Data presented is

• Requests are reviewed by a Panel and chosen based on need / feasibility

sponsors• Project is

completed and data is available to TC

presented is not trusted by committee

feasibility

7/31/2013

www.nfpa.org/codefund

Page 41 of 87

LegalLegalLegalLegalAntitrust: the single most important provision- Federal law prohibits contracts, combinations, or conspiracies which unreasonably restrain trade or commerceunreasonably restrain trade or commerce. Section 1 of the Sherman ActPatent: Disclosures of essential patent pclaims should be made by the patent holder, but others may also notify NFPA if they believe that a proposed or existing NFPA standard includes an essential patent claimessential patent claim.

7/31/2013

Page 42 of 87

LegalLegalLegalLegal Activities Disapproved by the Courtspp yPacking meetingsHiding commercial interest throwing the g g

committees out of balanceNo final decision-making authority to

unbalanced Task Groups; include all interested parties.Hiding scientific or technical information

from committees

7/31/2013

Page 43 of 87

Doc Info PagesDoc Info PagesDoc Info PagesDoc Info Pages

Document Information Next Edition Technical CommitteeDocument Information

• Document scope• Current/Previous

Edition information

Next Edition

• Submit Public Input/Comments via Electronic Submission

Technical Committee

• Committee name, responsibility and scope

• Issued TIAs, FIs and Errata

• Archived revision information

System. • Meetings and Ballots• ROP/ROC or First

Draft Report and

• Staff liaison• Committee list

• Private committee contact information

• Standard Council Decisions

• Articles and Reports• Read only document

Second Draft Report• NITMAM and Standard

Council Decisions• Private TC info

• Current committee documents in PDF format

• Committees seeking Read only document• Ballot circulations,

informational ballots and other committee info

gmembers and committee online application

7/31/2013

Page 44 of 87


Any questions?Any questions?

7/31/2013

Page 45 of 87

NFPA thanks you forNFPA thanks you for all of your hard workall of your hard work

and dedication as

Committee Members!

7/31/2013

Page 46 of 87

MEMORANDUM TO: Technical Committee on Motor Craft (MOR‐AAA) FROM: Lawrence B. Russell, Staff Liaison DATE: 31 July 2013 SUBJECT: Review of Public Comments for the Second Revision of NFPA 302, Fire Protection Standard for Pleasure and Commercial Motor Craft

The First Draft for NFPA 302 received 16 Public Comments. Three comments are linked to First Revisions (PC‐2, PC‐7 and PC‐8) and require action by the Committee. Thirteen comments submitted by Committee members (12 from James Cote and 1 form Joseph Derie) are new material ‐ a rookie mistake perhaps. As a reminder, in accordance with the Regulations Governing Committee Projects §4.4.4.2 public comments must be related to material that has received public review either through the submission of Public Input, Committee Input, or Correlating Input or through the First Revisions. There are thirteen (13) Public Comments that appear to introduce new material. As per the Regulations (§4.4.8.3) the Technical Committee should “Reject but Hold” any Public Comment that introduces “new material” or that has not had adequate public review. The table below summarizes the public comments received for NFPA 302.

Public Comment Number

Refers to Input Number

Applicable Section of NFPA 302

NFPA Staff Comment

8 PI ‐ 17 2.3.4 Committee needs to take action on this comment.

7 PI – 16 3.3.45 Committee needs to take action on this comment.

4 None 9.2.4 New Material. I recommend the Committee Reject but Hold in accordance with Regulations Governing Committee Projects 4.4.8.1(d). The reason is the comment introduces a concept that has not had public review by being included in a related Input or First Revision as shown in the First Draft (ref. 4.4.8.3.1(a)). If submitter is passionate for this change to the document then he can file a NITMAM with the Standards Council. This recommendation follows a discussion I had with the Standards Council Secretary on 5/14/13.

5 None 9.4.1 New Material. Same as for Comment #4.


11 None 10.2.3.1 New Material. Same as for Comment #4.




Page 47 of 87

Public Comment Number

Refers to Input Number

Applicable Section of NFPA 302

NFPA Staff Comment




16 None 10.20 There is no proposed text within this comment. The submitter wants input from the committee on three phase shore power systems. NFPA Staff recommends the Committee develop a task group to investigate the issue and then recommend action to be taken by the Committee at the next revision cycle or for a Tentative Interim Amendment (TIA) as appropriate. If a task group is created then, members of the NFPA 303 (Boatyards & Marinas) Committee should be included. [The NFPA 303 is in the Annual 2015 cycle. The Committee will have a First Draft Meeting before 12/13/13.]

3 None 11.1 New Material. Same as for Comment #4.

1 None 12.1.3.6.4 New Material. Same as for Comment #4.

2 PI – 8 Chap 13 Title

Committee needs to take action on this comment.

Please review the public comments to help expedite the committee action at the teleconference.

Page 48 of 87

Public Comment No. 8-NFPA 302-2013 [ Section No. 2.3.4 ]

2.3.4 ASTM Publications.ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM A463/A463M, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, Aluminum-Coated, by the Hot-DipProcess,2010.

ASTM A653/A653M, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) or Zinc-Iron Alloy-Coated (Galvannealed) by the Hot-Dip Process, 2011.

ASTM B96/B96M, Specification for Copper-Silicon Alloy Plate, Sheet, Strip, and Rolled Bar for GeneralPurposes and Pressure Vessels, 2011.

ASTM B122/B122 M, Standard Specification for Copper-Nickel-Tin Alloy, Copper-Nickel-Zinc Alloy (NickelSilver), and Copper-Nickel Alloy Plate, Sheet, Strip, and Rolled Bar, 2011.

ASTM B127, Standard Specification for Nickel-Copper Alloy (UNS N05500) Plate, Sheet, and Strip, 2009.

ASTM B152/B152 M, Standard Specification for Copper Sheet, Strip, Plate, and Rolled Bar, 2009.

ASTM D471, Standard Test Method for Rubber Property-Effect of Liquids, 2012.

ASTM E84, Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, 2012 2013 .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

standard date update

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Marcelo HirschlerOrganization: GBH InternationalStreet Address:City:State:Zip:Submittal Date: Thu May 02 19:31:03 EDT 2013

Copyright Assignment

I, Marcelo Hirschler, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright inthis Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend thatI acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similaror derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter intothis copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am Marcelo Hirschler, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and theterms and conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will,upon my submission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

1 of 16 7/31/2013 5:43 PM

Page 49 of 87


Return to previous definition and add extract reference.3.3.45* Ventilation.The changing of air within a compartment by natural or powered mechanical means [69] .


As a representative of the GOT Committee, I can report that the GOT committee is against the change made by the proposal. The GOT Committee's work has been to create general and consistent definitions of the same term throughout the NFPA system of documents. At present there are 10 definitions of "Ventilation." Prior to the ROP change made to 302, the definition of "Ventilation" in NFPA 302 matched the definition of "Ventilation" used in 1925 and 69, and also the first sentence of the one used in 402; it was a generic definition suitable as the overall NFPA definition. The change of the word, "mechanical" to "powered" makes the definition used in 302 completely unique and that would be going in the wrong direction for the Glossary of Terms, as recommended by the NFPA Standards Council. GOT recommends that NFPA 302 retains the existing definition or add a qualifier, such as “for the purposes of pleasure and commercial motorcraft”. Otherwise it is best if NFPA 302 “extracts” its definition from an existing document and NFPA 69 is a widely used.


Submitter Full Name: Susan DesrocherOrganization: [ Not Specified ]Affilliation: Glossary of Terms Committee memberStreet Address:City:State:Zip:Submittal Date: Sun Apr 21 11:16:31 EDT 2013


I, Susan Desrocher, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright inthis Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend thatI acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similaror derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter intothis copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am Susan Desrocher, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and theterms and conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will,upon my submission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature


2 of 16 7/31/2013 5:43 PM

Page 50 of 87


9.2.4 Grounded Systems.If one side of a two-wire dc system is connected to ground, it shall be the negative side, and the systemshall be polarized at a single location only .

9.2.4.1 The polarizing conductor or connection shall be capable of carrying full fault current of the dcsystem.


9.2.4 does not specify the minimum ampacity rating for the grounding conductor nor does it prohibit multiple grounding points for a negative conductor [bonding systems, grounding systems, or metal hulls could then act as parallel paths for negative return currents]


Submitter Full Name: James CoteOrganization: Cote Marine LLCStreet Address:City:State:Zip:Submittal Date: Mon Apr 15 21:18:59 EDT 2013


I, James Cote, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in thisPublic Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that Iacquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar orderivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter intothis copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am James Cote, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the termsand conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon mysubmission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature


3 of 16 7/31/2013 5:43 PM

Page 51 of 87


9.4.1 The negative When connected as a negative ground system, the negative terminal of the battery and thenegative side of the electrical power distribution system shall be connected to the engine negative terminalor its bus, unless permitted otherwise by 9.4.2.

9.4.1.1 Isolated ground battery systems shall be permitted only if a simple to operate ground faultdetection system is installed in a readily accessible location with clearly labeled instructions, and alldisconnect switches and overcurrent protection devices employ two pole common trip mechanisms.


Numerous European and Asian builders employ isolated ground battery systems [a.k.a. floating ground systems]. These systems are safe when properly installed and monitored. In fact, properly maintained isolated ground systems are more reliable than negative ground systems.







4 of 16 7/31/2013 5:43 PM

Page 52 of 87


9.14.12 Terminal connectors of the ring and captive spade type shall be the same nominal size as the stud.Locking hardware shall be used wherever practical.


Vibration can result in loose and overheated connections.







5 of 16 7/31/2013 5:43 PM

Page 53 of 87

Public Comment No. 11-NFPA 302-2013 [ Section No. 10.2.3.1 ]

10.2.3.1 A grounded neutral system shall be required unless otherwise permitted by 10.2.4 unless a ground faultdetection system is installed and all switches, circuit breakers, etc . are common trip devices thatsimultaneously disconnect the neutral conductor with the ungrounded conductors. The ground faultdetection system shall be simple to operate and installed in a commonly used area.


Isolated ground systems can be safely installed and are very popular in some parts of the world.


Submitter Full Name: James CoteOrganization: Cote Marine LLCStreet Address:City:State:Zip:Submittal Date: Thu May 02 21:54:09 EDT 2013





6 of 16 7/31/2013 5:43 PM

Page 54 of 87


10.2.6 Individual circuits shall not be capable of being energized by more than one source of electrical power at atime except as specified in 10.2.6.1 , and each shore power inlet or generator shall be a separate source ofelectrical power.

10.2.6.1. Paralleling of AC power sources shall be permitted if appropriate and failsafe synchronization,real power sharing,reactive power sharing, and reverse power protection equipment is installed. Thisequipment and its installation shall meet the approval of the power source equipment and switchboardmanufacturers.


Paralleling power sources is common place in the marine industry today. NFPA should participate in the regulation of this practice.







7 of 16 7/31/2013 5:43 PM

Page 55 of 87


10.2.8 The transfer from one power source circuit to another shall be made by a means that opens all current-carrying conductors, including neutrals, before closing the alternate source circuit, and that prevents arcover between sources. Note: Neutral conductors need not be switched if shore power transformers areinstalled [i.e. dockside neutral is not brought on board to the switchboard] and all power source neutralsare connected together and to ground at a single point as described in 10.2.4.2.


There is no need to switch the neutral conductors if all power source neutrals are interconnected and grounded in the switchboard. If shore power is used then transformers must be installed







8 of 16 7/31/2013 5:43 PM

Page 56 of 87

Public Comment No. 12-NFPA 302-2013 [ Section No. 10.9.3.3 ]

10.9.3.3 If the conductor is connected directly to the battery terminal alternating current power source outputterminals , and where it is not practical to locate overcurrent protection at the source of power, conductorsshall be provided with overcurrent protection no more than 72 in. (183 cm) from the battery terminal outputterminals .


This section refers to AC power not batteries







9 of 16 7/31/2013 5:43 PM

Page 57 of 87

Public Comment No. 13-NFPA 302-2013 [ New Section after 10.10.7.1 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENTBattery Charger Grounding ConductorsType your content here ...The battery charger alternating current input circuit grounding conductor will likelynot be rated to safely carry the DC fault current if a battery positive conductor faults to the battery chargerchassis. Therefore, a DC grounding conductor of adequate size should be installed between the batterycharger chassis and the battery negative grounding point.


A fire hazard exists without the DC grounding conductor







10 of 16 7/31/2013 5:43 PM

Page 58 of 87


10.14.17 Solderless crimp-on connectors shall be attached with the type of crimping tools designed for the connectorused and connectors shall be sized to match the wire to which they are attached .


I have often seen incorrectly sized terminals crimped on wires such as 10-12 terminals on #16 conductors or #6 conductors jammed into a #8 terminal.







11 of 16 7/31/2013 5:43 PM

Page 59 of 87


10.15.1 Receptacles shall be installed in locations normally not subject to rain, spray, or flooding, or shall beprotected as follows:

(1) Weatherproof if subject installed on a weather deck, installed in a machinery space, or subject to rainor spray

(2) Watertight if subject to flooding


Machinery spaces are house numerous pumps and hoses. Also, "subject to" is a vague term. What if the receptacle is under cover?







12 of 16 7/31/2013 5:43 PM

Page 60 of 87

Public Comment No. 16-NFPA 302-2013 [ New Section after 10.20 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENTThree Phase Shore Power SystemsType your content here ...


NFPA recognizes three phase distribution but not three phase shore power. I have not provided detail on new section as I would like input from the committee first.







13 of 16 7/31/2013 5:43 PM

Page 61 of 87

Public Comment No. 3-NFPA 302-2013 [ Section No. 11.1 ]

11.1 General.Lightning protection systems shall follow the guidelines in ABYC TE-4, Lightning Protection or NFPA780, Chapter 10 Protection for Watercraft .


TE-4 has not been reviewed or revised since 2006. NFPA should reference to its own standard when applicable.







14 of 16 7/31/2013 5:43 PM

Page 62 of 87

Public Comment No. 1-NFPA 302-2013 [ New Section after 12.1.3.6.4 ]

12.1.3.6.4 Fixed systems shall have a plaque or decal affixed near them in a clearly visible location stating:"NOTICE: The manufacturer of this fixed fire extinguishing system recommends that this system beinspected ___________ (insert time period: annually, etc.) by a qualified technician."

Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description Approved302_Derie.pdf Cover Sheet


As a marine surveyor for the last 10+ years and Certified Fire Investigator I am intimately familiar with the installation of Fixed Fire Extinguishing systems in recreational boats. I cannot remember ever surveying a recreational vessel in which the Fixed Fire Extinguishing system was properly inspected as recommended by Annex E, NFPA 302. All the owners I queried were unaware of any requirement for those systems to be inspected. Many assumed that their boatyard was doing the inspection, which, in my experience was not the case. In many cases these systems have failed to operate when a fire occurred. Having a permanently affixed, legible label that contains at a minimum the recommended wording in the machinery space to advise owners of the requirement to inspect these systems on a periodic basis, as recommended by the manufacturer, will hopefully insure these systems are periodically inspected and go far toward ensuring these systems work properly if required. It is felt that having this information on a permanently affixed, legible label a clearly visible location would be better than having it on the extinguisher bottle itself because a label is more noticeable, the lack of space on extinguisher bottles and the lack of space in many recreational boats machinery spaces for owners to get close enough to extinguishers bottles to read the labels.


Submitter Full Name: Joseph DerieOrganization: SW Passage Marine SurveysStreet Address:City:State:Zip:Submittal Date: Tue Mar 12 12:49:46 EDT 2013


I, Joseph Derie, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyright in thisPublic Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intend that Iacquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or another similar orderivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority to enter intothis copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am Joseph Derie, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and the termsand conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will, upon mysubmission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature


15 of 16 7/31/2013 5:43 PM

Page 63 of 87

Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 302-2013 [ Chapter 13 [Title Only] ]

Carbon Monoxide Detection

Change title to Carbon Monoxide and Smoke Detection


clarifies where Carbon Monoxide detection can be found.


Submitter Full Name: Kenneth WeinbrechtOrganization: Ocean-Bay Marine Services, IncAffilliation: Representing Society of Accredited Marine SurveyorsStreet Address:City:State:Zip:Submittal Date: Sat Mar 16 14:26:12 EDT 2013


I, Kenneth Weinbrecht, hereby irrevocably grant and assign to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) all and full rights in copyrightin this Public Comment (including both the Proposed Change and the Statement of Problem and Substantiation). I understand and intendthat I acquire no rights, including rights as a joint author, in any publication of the NFPA in which this Public Comment in this or anothersimilar or derivative form is used. I hereby warrant that I am the author of this Public Comment and that I have full power and authority toenter into this copyright assignment.

By checking this box I affirm that I am Kenneth Weinbrecht, and I agree to be legally bound by the above Copyright Assignment and theterms and conditions contained therein. I understand and intend that, by checking this box, I am creating an electronic signature that will,upon my submission of this form, have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature


16 of 16 7/31/2013 5:43 PM

Page 64 of 87

MEMORANDUM TO: Technical Committee on Motor Craft (MOR‐AAA) FROM: Lawrence B. Russell, Staff Liaison DATE: 31 July 2013 SUBJECT: Review of Committee Input for the Second Revision of NFPA 302, Fire Protection Standard for Pleasure and Commercial Motor Craft

No comments were received on any of the three (3) Committee Inputs (CI‐31, CI‐32 and CI‐57). The committee can incorporate these changes into the document as a second revision or can leave them alone until the next revision cycle. NFPA Staff recommends making the three Committee Inputs second revisions since the public has had an opportunity to comment on these proposed changes. The three Committee Input items created during the First Draft meeting are attached to this memo. Please review the Committee Inputs to help expedite the committee action at the teleconference.

Page 65 of 87

Committee Input No. 32-NFPA 302-2012 [ Section No. 12.1.2.4 ]

12.1.2.4 Portable fire extinguishers, other than those addressed in 12.1.2.6, shall be U.S. Coast Guard–approved. listed or labeled by a qualified testing agency and shall be installed in accordance with listingrequirements and/or manufacturer's instructions.


Submitter Full Name: [ Not Specified ]Organization: [ Not Specified ]Street Address:City:State:Zip:Submittal Date: Tue Aug 28 14:50:24 EDT 2012

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The Committee wants to make the requirement compliant with NFPA 2001 and is interested ingetting feedback from affected stakeholders and the US Coast Guard on this change to therequirement.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results

This item has not been balloted


1 of 20 7/31/2013 5:47 PM

Page 66 of 87

Committee Input No. 31-NFPA 302-2012 [ Section No. 12.1.3.4 ]

12.1.3.4* Fixed systems shall comply with the following criteria:

(1) They shall meet the requirements of the manufacturer's instructions.

(2) They shall meet the requirements of NFPA 12, Standard on Carbon Dioxide Extinguishing Systems;NFPA 12A, Standard on Halon 1301 Fire Extinguishing Systems; NFPA 2001, Standard on CleanAgent Fire Extinguishing Systems; or NFPA 2010, Standard for Fixed Aerosol Fire-ExtinguishingSystems, as appropriate, and shall be listed to the applicable ANSI/UL marine standard.

(3) For installation on pleasure craft, they shall be U.S. Coast Guard–approved. fixed fire protection systems shall be listed or labeled by a qualified testing agency and

shall be installed and connected in accordance with listing requirements and/or

manufacturer's instructions.

.


Submitter Full Name: [ Not Specified ]Organization: [ Not Specified ]Street Address:City:State:Zip:Submittal Date: Tue Aug 28 14:45:20 EDT 2012

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The Committee wants to make the requirement compliant with NFPA 2001 and is interested ingetting feedback from affected stakeholders and the US Coast Guard on this change to therequirement.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results



2 of 20 7/31/2013 5:47 PM

Page 67 of 87

Committee Input No. 57-NFPA 302-2012 [ Sections E.1, E.2, E.3, E.4, E.5, E.6 ]

Sections E.1, E.2, E.3, E.4, E.5, E.6E.

1 Introduction1 Introduction .

This annex is provided as an aid to the user of NFPA 302 by identifying those portions of NFPA standardsthat pertain to inspection and frequency of maintenance of fixed extinguishing systems and portable fireextinguishers. It is not intended that this annex provide complete information regarding all aspects ofservicing fire protection equipment. It is important to note that this information was not copied using

NFPA'sNFPA’s extract policy and is not intended to be a part of the requirements of NFPA 302 unless specified inChapter 1 through Chapter 12 . While the

20022010 edition of NFPA 10, the

20002011 edition of NFPA 12, the

20012009 edition of NFPA 12A, and the

20002012 edition of NFPA 2001 were the most current at the time of the publication of the

2004 this edition of NFPA 302, more recent editions might have been issued.

E.

2 Definitions2 Definitions .

See NFPA 10, Standard for Portable Fire Extinguishers , NFPA 12, Standard on Carbon DioxideExtinguishing Systems , NFPA 12A, Standard on Halon 1301 Fire Extinguishing Systems , and NFPA 2001,Standard on Clean Agent Fire Extinguishing Systems , for definition of terms used in this annex.

E.

3 Inspection3 Inspection , Maintenance, and Recharging Portable Fire Extinguishers.

E.3.

1 General1 General .

E.3.1.

1 1 This section is concerned with the rules governing inspection, maintenance, and recharging of fireextinguishers. These factors are of prime importance in ensuring operation at the time of a fire.

[ 10: 6.1.1]E.3.1.2 The procedure for inspection and maintenance of fire extinguishers varies considerably. Minimal knowledgeis necessary to perform a monthly “quick check” or inspection in order to follow the inspection procedure as


3 of 20 7/31/2013 5:47 PM

Page 68 of 87

outlined in Section 7.2 of NFPA 10. [ 10: A.7.1]

E.3. 1. 2

.A trained person who has undergone the instructions necessary to reliably perform maintenance and hasthe

manufacturer'smanufacturer’s service manual shall service the fire extinguishers not more than 1 year apart. [ 10: 6.1.2]

E.3.1.

3 3 The owner or designated agent or occupant of a property in which fire extinguishers are located shall beresponsible for such inspection, maintenance, and recharging. (See E.3.1.2 and E.3.1.4 .) [ 10:

67 .1.

31 ]

E.3.1.

4 Maintenance, servicing,4 Persons performing maintenance and recharging of extinguishers shall be

performed by trained persons havingtrained and shall have available the appropriate manufacturer’s servicing manual(s), the

proper types ofcorrect tools, recharge materials, lubricants, and

manufacturer'smanufacturer’s recommended replacement parts or parts specifically listed for use in the fire extinguisher.[ 10:

67 .1.

42.2 ]

E.3.1.

5 5 Tags or labels intended for recording inspections, maintenance, or recharging shall not be placed on thefront of the fire extinguisher. [ 10:

67 .1.

54.1 ]

E.3.1.

6 6 Labels indicating fire extinguisher use or classification or both shall be permitted to be placed on the frontof the fire extinguisher. [ 10:

67 .1.

64.2 ]

E.3.

2 Inspection2 Inspection .

E.3.2.


4 of 20 7/31/2013 5:47 PM

Page 69 of 87

1 Frequency1 Frequency .

E.3.2.1.1 Fire extinguishers shall be manually inspected when initially placed in service

and thereafter at approximately 30-day intervals.. [ 10 :7.2.1.1]

E.3.2.1.2 Fire extinguishers shall be inspected

,either manually or by means of an electronic monitoring

, atdevice/system at a minimum of 30-day intervals. [ 10 :7.2.1.2]

E.3.2.1.3 Fire extinguishers shall be inspected at more frequent intervals when circumstances require.[ 10 :

67 .2.1 .3 ]

E.3.2.

2 Procedures2 Procedures .

Periodic inspection or electronic monitoring of fire extinguishers shall include a check of at least thefollowing items:

(1) Location in designated place

(2) No obstruction to access or visibility

Operating instructions on nameplate legible and facing outward

Safety seals and tamper indicators not broken or missing

Fullness determined by weighing or “hefting”

Examination for obvious physical damage, corrosion, leakage, or clogged nozzle(3) Pressure gauge reading or indicator in the operable range or position

(4) Fullness determined by weighing or hefting for self-expelling-type extinguishers, cartridge-operated extinguishers, and pump tanks

(5) Condition of tires, wheels, carriage, hose, and nozzle

checked (for wheeled

units)HMIS label in place [ 10: 6.2.2extinguishers

(6) Indicator for nonrechargeable extinguishers using push-to-test pressure indicators [ 10 :7.2.2]

E.3.2.2.1 In addition to E.3.2.2, fire extinguishers shall be visually inspected in accordance with E.3.2.2.2 ifthey are located where any of the following conditions exist:

(1) High frequency of fires in the past

(2) Severe hazards

(3) Locations that make fire extinguishers susceptible to mechanical injury or physical damage

(4) Exposure to abnormal temperatures or corrosive atmospheres [ 10 :7.2.2.1 ]

E.3.2.

3 Corrective Action. 2.2 Where required by E.3.2.2.1, the following procedures shall be in addition to those addressed inE.3.2.2:

(1) Verifying that operating instructions on nameplates are legible and face outward

(2) Checking for broken or missing safety seals and tamper indicators


5 of 20 7/31/2013 5:47 PM

Page 70 of 87

(3) Examination for obvious physical damage, corrosion, leakage, or clogged nozzle [ 10 :7.2.2.2]

E.3.2.3 Corrective Action. When an inspection of any fire extinguisher reveals a deficiency in any of theconditions listed in E.3.2.2 , immediate corrective action shall be taken. [ 10:

67 .2.3]

E.3.2.3.

1 Rechargeable1 Rechargeable Fire Extinguishers.

When an inspection of any rechargeable fire extinguisher reveals a deficiency in any of the conditions listedin E.3.2.2 (3)

,or E.3.2.2 (4),

E.3.2.2 (5), E.3.2.2 (6), E.3.2.2 (7), and E.3.2.2 (8), itthe extinguisher shall be subjected to applicable maintenance procedures. [ 10:

67 .2.3.1]

E.3.2.3.

2 Nonrechargeable2 Non rechargeable Dry Chemical Fire Extinguisher.

When an inspection of any

nonrechargeablenon rechargeable dry chemical fire extinguisher reveals a deficiency in any of the conditions listed inE.3.2.2 (3), E.3.2.2 (

54 ), or E.3.2.2 (6),

and E.3.2.2 (7), itthe extinguisher shall be removed from further use, discharged, and destroyed at the direction of the owneror returned to the manufacturer. [ 10:

67 .2.3.2]

E.3.2.3.

3 Nonrechargeable3 Non rechargeable Halon Agent Fire Extinguisher.

When an inspection of any nonrechargeable fire extinguisher containing a halon agent reveals a deficiencyin any of the conditions listed in

E E .3.2.2 (3), E.3.2.2 (

54 ), or E.3.2.2 (6),

and E.3.2.2 (7), itthe extinguisher shall be removed from service, not discharged, and returned to the manufacturer

. If the fire extinguisher is not returned to the manufacturer,

it shall be returned toa fire equipment dealer , or a distributor to permit recovery of the halon. [ 10:

67 .2.3.3]

E.3.2.


6 of 20 7/31/2013 5:47 PM

Page 71 of 87

4 Inspection4 Inspection Recordkeeping.

E.3.2.4.

1 1 Personnel making manual inspections shall keep records of all fire extinguishers inspected, includingthose found to require corrective action. [ 10:

67 .2.4.1]

E.3.2.4.

2 At2 Where at least monthly manual inspections are conducted , the date the manual inspection wasperformed and the initials of the person performing the inspection shall be recorded. [ 10:

67 .2.4.

23 ]

E.3.2.4.

3 Records3 Where manual inspections are conducted, records for manual inspections shall be kept on a tag or labelattached to the fire extinguisher, on an inspection checklist maintained on file or by an electronic method

that provides a permanent record. [ 10:

67 .2.4.

34 ]

E.

4 Inspection4 Inspection and Maintenance of Fixed CO 2 Systems.

E.4.


E.4.1.

1 1 Persons who inspect, test, or maintain

, or operatecarbon dioxide

fire-extinguishingsystems

shallshould be

thoroughlytrained and periodically tested for competence in the functions they perform. Attending training programsoffered by equipment manufacturers and other training organizations should be considered. [ 12:

1


7 of 20 7/31/2013 5:47 PM

Page 72 of 87

A .

114 . 8. 4]

E.4.1.

2 Prior to testing or maintenance of a fixed carbon dioxide system, all personnel shall be evacuated fromthe protected space (See Section 1.6 of NFPA 12)2 When maintenance or testing is being conducted on the system, it shall be locked out, or the protectedspace and affected spaces (migration) shall be evacuated . [ 12:

64 .3.

13.4.3 ]

E.4.


E.4.2.

1 1 At least every 30 days, an inspection shall be conducted to assess the

system'ssystem’s operational condition. [ 12:

14 .

118 .1]

E.4.2.

2 2 An inspection is a

“quick check”quick check to give reasonable assurance that the extinguishing system is fully charged and operable

and. It is done by seeing that the system is in place, that it has not been

activatedactuated or tampered with, and that there is no obvious physical damage or condition to prevent operation.As a minimum, the inspection should determine the following:

(1) High-pressure cylinders are in place and properly secured.

(2) For a low-pressure storage unit,

thatthe pressure gauge shows normal pressure, that tank shutoff valve is open, and that the pilotpressure supply valve is open.

LiquidThe liquid level gauge should be observed. If at any time a container shows a loss of more than 10percent, it should be refilled, unless the minimum gas requirements are still provided.

(3) Carbon dioxide storage is connected to discharge piping and actuators.

(4) All manual actuators are in place and tamper seals are intact.

(5) Nozzles are connected, properly aligned, and free from obstructions and foreign matter.

(6) Detectors are in place and free from foreign matter and obstructions.

System(7) The system control panel is connected and showing “normal


8 of 20 7/31/2013 5:47 PM

Page 73 of 87

-ready” condition. [ 12: A.

14 .

118 .1]

E.4.2.

3 3 All system hose , including those used as flexible connectors shall be tested every 5 years inaccordance with

14 .

118 .2 of NFPA 12. [ 12:

14 .

118 .2.

13 ]

E.4.

3 Maintenance3 Maintenance .

E.4.3.

1 A manufacturer's1 A manufacturer’s test and maintenance procedure shall be provided to the owner for testing andmaintenance of the system. This procedure shall provide for the initial testing of the equipment as well asfor periodic test inspection and maintenance of the system. Actuation, impairment, and restoration of thisprotection shall be reported promptly to the authority having jurisdiction. [ 12:

14 .

118 .3.1]

E.4.3.

2 2 The following shall be verified by competent personnel at least annually using available documentationrequired in

14 .

74 .2.

614 of NFPA 12.

(1) Check and test the carbon dioxide system for proper operation.

(2) Check that there have been no changes to the size, type, and configuration of the hazard andsystem.

(3) Check and test all time delays for operation.

(4) Check and test all audible alarms for operation.

(5) Check and test all visible signals for operation.


9 of 20 7/31/2013 5:47 PM

Page 74 of 87

(6) Check that all warning signs are installed in accordance with 4.3.2 of NFPA 12.

(7) Check to ensure that the procedures in 4.5.6 of NFPA 12 are appropriate and the devices in 4.5.6of NFPA 12 are operable.

(8) Check and test each detector using methods specified in NFPA 72 . [ 12:

14 .

118 .3.2]

E.4.3.2.

1 1 The goal of this maintenance and testing shall be not only to ensure that the system is in full operatingcondition, but shall also indicate the probable continuance of that condition until the next inspection. [ 12:

14 .

118 .3.2.1]

E.4.3.2.

2 Suitable discharge2 Discharge tests shall be made when any maintenance indicates their advisability. [ 12: 4.8.3.2.2]

E.4.3.2.3 Prior to testing,

propersafety procedures shall be reviewed. (See Section

14 .

63 and A.

14 .

63 of NFPA 12.) [ 12:

14 .

118 .3.2.

23 ]

E.4.3.

3 3 A maintenance report with recommendations shall be filed with the owner. [ 12:

14 .

118 .3.3]

E.4.3.

4 4 Between the regular service contract maintenance or tests, the system shall be inspected visually orotherwise by approved or competent personnel who follow an approved schedule. [ 12: 1.11.3.4]

E.4.3.

5 5 High-Pressure Cylinder Weights


10 of 20 7/31/2013 5:47 PM

Page 75 of 87

E.4.3.5.1 At least semiannually, all high-pressure cylinders shall be weighed and the date of the lasthydrostatic test noted (see

14 .

96 .5.

12 of NFPA 12) . [ 12: 4.8.3.5.1]

E.4.3.5.2 If, at any time, a container shows a loss in net content of more than 10 percent, it shall be refilledor replaced. [ 12:

14 .

118 .3.5 .2 ]

E.4.3.

6 6 Low-Pressure Container Liquid Levels

E.4.3.6.1 At least weekly, the liquid level gauges of low-pressure containers shall be observed.[ 12: 4.8.3.6.1]

E.4.3.6.2 If at any time a container shows a loss of more than 10 percent, it shall be refilled, unless theminimum gas requirements are still provided. [ 12:

14 .

118 .3.6 .2 ]

E.4.3.

7 Testing of heat, smoke, and flame detectors shall be in accordance with Chapter 7 of7 Automatic detection shall be by any listed or approved method or device that is capable of detecting andindicating heat, flame, smoke, combustible vapors, or an abnormal condition in the hazard such as aprocess trouble that is likely to produce fire.[ 12: 4.5.3]

E.4.3.7.1 Detectors installed at the maximum spacing as listed or approved for fire alarm use can result inexcessive delay in agent release.

For additional information on detectors, refer to NFPA 72 . [ 12:

1A .

114 . 5. 3

.7]

E.4.3.

8 These systems shall be kept8 The goal of this maintenance and testing shall be not only to ensure that the system is in full operatingcondition

at all times. Use, impairment, and restoration of this protection shall be reported promptly to the authorityhaving jurisdiction. Any troubles or impairments shall be corrected at once by competent personnel.[ 12: 1.11.3.8]E.5 Inspection, but shall also indicate the probable continuance of that condition until the next inspection. [ 12: 4.8.3.2.1]

E.5 Inspection and Tests of Fixed Halogenated Agent Systems.

E.5.


11 of 20 7/31/2013 5:47 PM

Page 76 of 87


E.5.1.

1 1 All persons who could be expected to inspect, test, maintain, operate, or decommission and remove fireextinguishing systems shall be thoroughly trained and kept thoroughly trained in the functions they areexpected to perform. [ 12A:

46 .6]

E.5.1.

2 2 Personnel working in a halon-protected enclosure shall receive training regarding halon safety issues.[ 12A:

46 .6.1]

E.5.


E.5.2.

1 1 At least semiannually, all systems shall be thoroughly inspected, tested, and documented for properoperation by trained competent personnel. Tests shall be in accordance with the appropriate NFPA orCanadian standards. [ 12A:

46 .1.1]

E.5.2.

2 2 Some protected area conditions could require inspections more frequent than semiannually. A servicecontract with an approved fire protection contractor is recommended. The inspection and test is to beconducted in accordance with the

manufacturer'smanufacturer’s recommendations and procedures and appropriate NFPA standards and guides. Inspectioncriteria include but are not limited to the following:

(1) Detection. All detectors are to be checked for proper alarm, supervision, and trouble functions.

(2) Actuation.

(a) Remove automatic actuation controls from agent containers. Test detection system tooperate the necessary circuit(s) to simulate agent release.

(b) Operate all manual devices to simulate agent release.

(c) After testing, reset and reinstall all actuation controls.

(3) Containers.

(a) Examine all containers for evidence of corrosion or mechanical damage.

(b) Check container bracketing and supports to determine that their condition is satisfactory.

(4) Piping and Nozzles.

(a) Examine piping for any evidence of corrosion.

(b) Examine pipe hangers and straps to see that the piping is securely supported.

(c) Check nozzles for proper position and alignment and determine that the orifices are clear


12 of 20 7/31/2013 5:47 PM

Page 77 of 87

and unobstructed.

(d) Check nozzle seals, if applicable, for signs of deterioration and replace if necessary.

(5) Auxiliary Equipment.

(a) Operate all auxiliary and supplementary components such as switches, door and windowreleases, interconnected valves, damper releases, air - handling equipment shutdown, andsupplementary alarms to ensure that they are in proper operating condition.

(b) Return all devices to normal “operating” condition after testing. [ 12A: A.

46 .1]

E.5.2.

3 3 The documented report , with recommendations , shall be filed with the owner. [ 12A:

46 .1.2]

E.5.2.

4 4 The agent quantity and pressure of refillable containers shall be checked. If a container shows a loss innet weight of more than 5 percent or a loss in pressure (adjusted for temperature) of more than 10 percent,it shall be refilled or replaced. When the amount of agent in the container is determined by specialmeasuring devices in lieu of weighing, these devices shall be listed. [ 12A:

46 .1.3]

E.5.2.

5 5 All halon removed from refillable containers during service or maintenance procedures shall be collectedfor recycling. [ 12A:

46 .1.4]

E.5.2.

6 6 Factory-charged

nonrefillablenon refillable containers that do not have a means of pressure indication shall be weighed at leastsemiannually. If a container shows a loss in net weight of more than 5 percent, it shall be replaced. Allfactory-charged

nonrefillablenon refillable containers removed from useful service shall be returned for recycling of the agent. [ 12A:

46 .1.5]

E.5.2.

7 7 The weight and pressure of the container shall be recorded on a tag attached to the container. [ 12A:

46 .1.6]

E.5.

3 Containers3 Containers .

E.5.3.

1


13 of 20 7/31/2013 5:47 PM

Page 78 of 87

1 DOT, CTC, or similar design Halon 1301 cylinders shall not be recharged without a retest if more than 5years have elapsed since the date of the last test and inspection. [ 12A: 6.2.1]

E.5.3.1.1 The retest shall be permitted to consist of a complete visual inspection as described in the

Code of Federal RegulationsCFR , Title 49

, “Transportation,” Parts 170–190 and Subpart C, Section 173.34(e)(10), and Section 178.36 through178.68.. [ 12A: 6.2.1.1]

E.5.3.1.2 In Canada, the corresponding information

isshall be as set forth in the Canadian Transport

Commission'sCommission’s Regulations for the Transportation of Dangerous Commodities by Rail . [ 12A:

46 .2.1

].2

E.5.3.

2 2 Cylinders continuously in service without discharging shall be given a complete external visual inspectionevery 5 years, in accordance with Compressed Gas Association pamphlet C-6, Section 3, except that thecylinders need not be emptied or stamped while under pressure. [ 12A:

46 .2.2]

E.5.3.

3 3 Where external visual inspection indicates that the container has been damaged, additional strengthtests shall be required.

CAUTION: If additional tests used include hydrostatic testing, containers should be thoroughly driedbefore refilling. [ 12A:

46 .2.3]

E.5.

4 Hoses4 Hoses .

E.5.4.

1 1 All system hoses shall be examined annually for damage. If visual examination shows any deficiency, thehose shall be immediately replaced or tested as specified in

4-6. 3.1 of NFPA 12A. [ 12A:

46 .3]

E.5.4.

2 2 All hoses shall be tested every 5 years in accordance with

4-6. 3.1 of NFPA 12A. [ 12A:

4


14 of 20 7/31/2013 5:47 PM

Page 79 of 87

6 .3.2]

E.5.

5 Enclosure5 Enclosure Inspection.

At least every 6 months the halon-protected enclosure shall be thoroughly inspected to determine ifpenetrations or other changes have occurred that could adversely affect halon leakage. [ 12A: 6.4]

E.5.5.1 Where the inspection indicates that conditions exist that could result in inability to maintain thehalon concentration, they shall be corrected. If uncertainty still exists, the enclosures shall be retested forintegrity. [ 12A: 6. 4.

41 ]

E.5.


E.5.6.

1 1 These systems shall be maintained in full operating condition at all times. Use, impairment, andrestoration of this protection shall be reported promptly to the authority having jurisdiction. [ 12A:

46 .5.1]

E.5.6.

2 2 Any troubles or impairments shall be corrected at once by competent personnel. [ 12A:

46 .5.2]

E.5.6.

3 3 Any penetrations made through the halon-protected enclosure shall be sealed immediately. The methodof sealing shall restore the original fire resistance rating and tightness of the enclosure. [ 12A:

46 .5.3]

E.

6 Inspection6 Inspection and Tests of Clean Agent Systems.

E.6.

1 Training1 Training .

E.6.1.

1 1 All persons who could be expected to inspect, test, maintain, or operate fire extinguishing systems shallbe thoroughly trained and kept thoroughly trained in the functions they are expected to perform. [ 2001:

47 .6.1]

E.6.1.


15 of 20 7/31/2013 5:47 PM

Page 80 of 87

2 2 Personnel working in an enclosure protected by a clean agent shall receive training regarding agentsafety issues. [ 2001:

47 .6.2]

E.6.

2 Safety2 Safety .

Safe procedures shall be observed during installation, servicing, maintenance, testing, handling, andrecharging of clean agent systems and agent containers. [ 2001:

47 .8]

E.6.

3 Inspection3 Inspection and Testing.

E.6.3.

1 1 The installing contractor shall provide instructions for the operational features and inspection proceduresspecific to the clean agent system installed on the vessel. [ 2001: 5.11.4]

E.6.3.

2 2 At least annually, all systems shall be thoroughly inspected and tested for proper operation by

competent personnelpersonnel qualified in the installation and testing of clean agent extinguishing systems . Discharge tests

areshall not be required. [ 2001:

57 .

111.1 ]

E.6.3.

3 An3 The inspection report with recommendations shall be filed with the

vessel's master and the owner's agent. The report shall be available for inspection by the authority havingjurisdictionowner of the system . [ 2001:

57 .

111 .

12 ]

E.6.3.

4 4 At least

annuallysemiannually , the agent quantity and pressure of refillable containers shall be checked

by competent personnel


16 of 20 7/31/2013 5:47 PM

Page 81 of 87

.

The container pressure shall be verified and logged at least monthly by the vessel's crew.[ 2001:

57 .

111 .

23 ]

E.6.3.

5 5 For halocarbon clean agents, if a container shows a loss in agent quantity of more than 5 percent or aloss in pressure

,( adjusted for temperature

,) of more than 10 percent, it shall be refilled or replaced. [ 2001:

57 .

111 .3 .1 ]

E.6.3.

6 6 For inert gas clean agents that are not liquefied, pressure is an indication of agent quantity. If an inert gasclean agent container shows a loss in pressure

,( adjusted for temperature

,) of more than 5 percent, it shall be refilled or replaced. Where container pressure gauges are used for thispurpose, they shall be compared to a separate calibrated device at least annually. [ 2001:

57 .

111 .3.

12 ]

E.6.3.

7 7 Where the amount of agent in the container is determined by special measuring devices, these devicesshall be listed. [ 2001:

47 .1.3.3]

E.6.3.

8 8 All halocarbon clean agent removed from refillable containers during service or maintenance proceduresshall be collected and recycled or disposed of in an environmentally sound manner and in accordance withexisting laws and regulations. [ 2001:

47 .1.4]

E.6.3.

9


17 of 20 7/31/2013 5:47 PM

Page 82 of 87

9 Factory-charged,

nonrefillablenon refillable containers that do not have a means of pressure indication shall have the agent quantitychecked at least semiannually. If a container shows a loss in agent quantity of more than 5 percent, it shallbe replaced. All factory-charged,

nonrefillablenon refillable containers removed from useful service shall be returned for recycling of the agent ordisposed of in an environmentally sound manner and in accordance with existing laws and regulations.[ 2001:

47 .1.5]

E.6.3.

10 10 For halocarbon clean agents, the date of inspection, gross weight of cylinder plus agent or net weight ofagent, type of agent, person performing the inspection, and, where applicable, the pressure at a recordedtemperature shall be recorded on a tag attached to the container. For inert gas clean agents, the date ofinspection, type of agent, person performing the inspection, and the pressure at a recorded temperatureshall be recorded on a tag attached to the container. [ 2001:

47 .1.6]

E.6.3.

11 Containers11 Containers .

E.6.3.11.

1 1 U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), Canadian Transport Commission (CTC), or similar designclean agent containers shall not be recharged without retesting if more than 5 years have elapsed since thedate of the last test and inspection. For halocarbon agent storage containers, the retest shall be permitted toconsist of a complete visual inspection as described in 49 CFR

173.34(e)(10).. [ 2001: 7.2.1]

E.6.3.11.1.1 Transporting charged containers that have not been tested within 5 years could be illegal.Federal and local regulations should be consulted. [ 2001:

4A . 7. 2.1]

E.6.3.11.

2 2 Cylinders continuously in service without discharging shall be given a complete external visual inspectionevery 5 years or more frequently if required. The visual inspection shall be in accordance with Section 3 ofCGA C-6, Standard for Visual Inspection of Steel Compressed Gas Cylinders , except that the cylindersneed not be emptied or stamped while under pressure. Inspections shall be made only by competentpersonnel and the results recorded on both of the following:

(1) A record tag permanently attached to each cylinder

(2) A suitable inspection report

[ 2001: 7.2.2]

E.5.3.11.3 A completed copy of the inspection report shall be furnished to the owner of the system or anauthorized representative. These records shall be retained by the owner for the life of the system. [ 2001:

47 .2.2 .1 ]

E.6.3.11.


18 of 20 7/31/2013 5:47 PM

Page 83 of 87

3 3 Where external visual inspection indicates that the container has been damaged, additional strengthtests shall be required. [2001:

47 .2.3]

E.6.3.

12 Hoses12 Hoses .

E.6.3.12.

1 1 All system hose shall be examined annually for damage. If visual examination shows any deficiency, thehose shall be immediately replaced or tested as specified in

4-7. 3.2 of NFPA 2001. [ 2001:

47 .3.1]

E.6.3.12.

2 2 All hose shall be tested every 5 years

in accordance with 4.

3.2.2 of NFPA 2001.[ 2001:

47 .3.2.1]

E.6.

4 Enclosure Inspection. At least every 12 months4 Enclosure Inspection. Other than as identified in 7.4.1 of NFPA 2001 , the enclosure protected by theclean agent shall be thoroughly inspected at least every 12 months to determine if penetrations

orhave occurred that could lead to agent leakage, if other changes have occurred that could

adversely affect agent leakage orchange volume of hazard , or both. Where the inspection indicates conditions that could result in theinability of the enclosure to maintain the clean agent concentration,

theythe conditions shall be corrected. If uncertainty still exists, the

enclosuresenclosure shall be retested for integrity in accordance with

47 .7.2.3 of NFPA 2001. [ 2001: 7.4]

E.6.4.1 An enclosure inspection

isshall not be required every 12 months if a documented administrative control program exists thataddresses barrier integrity. [ 2001: 7. 4.

41 ]

E.6.



19 of 20 7/31/2013 5:47 PM

Page 84 of 87

E.6.5.

1 1 These systems shall be maintained in full operating condition at all times. Actuation, impairment, andrestoration of this protection shall be reported promptly to the authority having jurisdiction. [ 2001:

47 .5.1]

E.6.5.

2 2 Any troubles or impairments shall be corrected in a timely manner consistent with the hazard protected.[ 2001:

47 .5.2]

E.6.5.

3 3 Any penetrations made through the enclosure protected by the clean agent shall be sealed immediately.The method of sealing shall restore the original fire resistance rating of the enclosure. [ 2001:

47 .5.3]


Submitter Full Name: Larry RussellOrganization: National Fire Protection AssocStreet Address:City:State:Zip:Submittal Date: Fri Aug 31 14:58:21 EDT 2012

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The Committee has revised Annex E with extracts from the current editions of: NFPA 10, Standardfor Portable Fire Extinguishers, NFPA 12, Standard on Carbon Dioxide Extinguishing Systems,NFPA 12A, Standard on Halon 1301 Fire Extinguishing Systems, and NFPA 2001, Standard onClean Agent Fire Extinguishing Systems. This section was last revised in the 2004 edition of theStandard.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results



20 of 20 7/31/2013 5:47 PM

Page 85 of 87

MEMORANDUM TO: Technical Committee on Motor Craft (MOR‐AAA) FROM: Lawrence B. Russell, Staff Liaison DATE: 31 July 2013 SUBJECT: Second Revision Recommendation ‐ Manual of Style Equations in NFPA Documents

Background: As agreed by NFPA Division Managers, we are in the process of assuring all equations in NFPA documents are consistent with the Manual of Style. Per the Manual of Style, the first time a cross referenced equation appears, it is to be identified by its section number in parenthesis to the right hand side. Going forward in order to make our standards more consistent and allow a more uniform approach managing equations in our Codes and Standards making process the Standard Council is asking all Staff Liaisons to develop a Second Revision to ensure all equations conform to the Manual of Style method. Equations that are within Figures and Tables are not affected by this direction. Action for the Committee at the Second Draft Meeting: Below is the Second Revision that is needed for NFPA 302 to comply with this direction. Second Revision Recommendation #1 9.12.7 Conductor Sizing Formula. 9.12.7.1 Conductor sizes shall be permitted to be calculated by means of the following formula.

(9.12.7.1)

where: CM = circular mil area of conductor K = 10.75 (constant representing the mil‐foot resistance of copper) I = load current in amperes L = length of conductor from the positive powersource connection to the electrical device and back to the negative powersource connection, measured in feet E = voltage drop at load in volts (e.g., 12 volt@ 3 percent = 0.36) Committee Statement: Added an equation number to a cross‐referenced equation to conform to the NFPA Manual of Style. Second Revision Recommendation #2 A.8.1.3 The calculation method for the minimum effective area of fixed ventilation for accommodation spaces is as follows:

(A.8.1.3)

Page 86 of 87

where: V = effective area in in.2 (minimum4000 mm2) U = nominal heat input of nonflued appliances (cooker, stove, lamps) in kW F = nominal input of open, flued appliances (refrigerator, water heater, cabin heater) in kW P = number of persons for which the cabin is designed Committee Statement: Added an equation number to a cross‐referenced equation to conform to the NFPA Manual of Style.

Page 87 of 87

Date post:	19-May-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	2 times
Download:	0 times