+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Nicolay J. Hammer- Pair Instability Supernovae and Hypernovae

Nicolay J. Hammer- Pair Instability Supernovae and Hypernovae

Date post: 03-Oct-2014
Category:
Upload: tuoma2
View: 30 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
16
AIT 1 IAAT Pair Instability Supernovae and Hypernovae AIT Journal Club Tübingen, 07/24/2003 Nicolay J. Hammer 1
Transcript
Page 1: Nicolay J. Hammer- Pair Instability Supernovae and Hypernovae

AIT

1

IAAT

Pair InstabilitySupernovae and Hypernovae

AIT Journal ClubTübingen, 07/24/2003

Nicolay J. Hammer

1

Page 2: Nicolay J. Hammer- Pair Instability Supernovae and Hypernovae

AIT

2

IAAT

Overview

• Introduction• Pair instability Supernovae in Population III

stars• Summary

• References

Overview 1

Page 3: Nicolay J. Hammer- Pair Instability Supernovae and Hypernovae

AIT

3

IAAT

Classification of Supernovae

Spectra without hydrogen lines

• SupernovaeType Ia( SN Ia )

• SupernovaeType Ib( SN Ib )

• SupernovaeType Ic( SN Ic )

Spectra with hydrogen lines

• SupernovaeType II ( SN II )

• M ≈ −17m±2 mag

• vexp ≈ 10 000 Km/s ; Etot ≈ 1051 erg

Introduction 1

Page 4: Nicolay J. Hammer- Pair Instability Supernovae and Hypernovae

AIT

4

IAAT

Classification of Supernovae

Further classification of Type I Supernovae

• SupernovaeType Ia( SN Ia )

– SiII lines ( e.g. 620 nm )

– M ≈ −19m

– vexp ≈ 20 000 Km/s

– Etot ≈ 1053 erg

– complete disruption, no remnant

Introduction 2

Page 5: Nicolay J. Hammer- Pair Instability Supernovae and Hypernovae

AIT

5

IAAT

Classification of Supernovae

• SupernovaeType Ib( SN Ib )

– HeI lines

– M ≈ −17m..−18m

– vexp ≈ 10 000 Km/s

• SupernovaeType Ic( SN Ic )

– no HeI and SiII lines

– M ≈ −17m..−18m

– vexp ≈ 10 000 Km/s

Introduction 3

Page 6: Nicolay J. Hammer- Pair Instability Supernovae and Hypernovae

AIT

6

IAAT

Lightcurves of different Supernovae typesZimmermann & .Weigert (1999)

Introduction 4

Page 7: Nicolay J. Hammer- Pair Instability Supernovae and Hypernovae

AIT

7

IAAT

Core Collaps Supernovae

• SupernovaeType II, progenitor massM? ≈ 8..13M�

– trigger mechanism:p+ e+ −→ n+ νe

– remnant is a Neutron Star (NS)

• SupernovaeType II andIb/c, progenitor massM? ≈ 13..100M�

– trigger mechanism:γ + 56Fe −→ 134He+4 n

γ + 4He −→ 2 p +2 n

– remnant is a NS or black hole (BH)

• SupernovaeType II andIb/c, progenitor massM? & 100M�

– trigger mechanism:γ −→ e− + e+

– remnant seemed to be BH

Introduction 5

Page 8: Nicolay J. Hammer- Pair Instability Supernovae and Hypernovae

AIT

8

IAATpre-SupernovaeThe Electronic Universe Project, University of Oregon

Introduction 6

Page 9: Nicolay J. Hammer- Pair Instability Supernovae and Hypernovae

AIT

9

IAAT

Definition of Population III stars

Population III starsare the stars of the firstgeneration.

• metallicity Z? < 10−4, in simulation normally setZ? = 0

• made fromprimordialmaterial (76% Hand24% He)

• the initial mass function (IMF) was very different

=⇒ a large number of stars with massesM? ≈ 102..103 M�

• very shortlifetimes(∼ Myr) for the upper end of the IMF

Pair instability Supernovae in Population III stars 1

Page 10: Nicolay J. Hammer- Pair Instability Supernovae and Hypernovae

AIT

10

IAAT

Pair instability Supernovae in Population III stars

super heavyPopulation III starsare making core collaps super- orhypernova

• mass of progenitor starM? . 140M�

– trigger: instability by pair production

– remnant seemed to be a BH

• mass of progenitor star140M� < M? < 260M� (e.g. M? = 250M�)

– trigger: instability by pair production

– compete disruption, no remnant

• mass of progenitor starM? & 260M� (e.g. M? = 300M�)

– trigger: photo desintigration

– remnant seemed to be a BH Bromm et al. (2003), Fryer et al. (2001)

Pair instability Supernovae in Population III stars 2

Page 11: Nicolay J. Hammer- Pair Instability Supernovae and Hypernovae

AIT

11

IAAT

progenitor star, 140M� < M? < 260M�

core collaps of anPopulation III starwith lower 260M�

• after He burning (Mcore ≈ 130M�)=⇒ electron-positron pair instability=⇒ explosive O and Si burning

• helium core mass increases=⇒ stronger explosions=⇒ more56Ni is produced

• the explosive O and Si burning reverses the collaps into a giantnuclear-powered explosion

• Eexpl ≈ 1052erg, ligth curve∼ 1044erg s−1 and ejected56Ni massMNi & 40M�

• star completedisrupted, material completecycled backto theISM

Pair instability Supernovae in Population III stars 3

Page 12: Nicolay J. Hammer- Pair Instability Supernovae and Hypernovae

AIT

12

IAAT

progenitor star, M? > 260M�

core collaps of anPopulation III starwith more than260M�

• at the end of He burning (Mcore ≈ 180M�)

=⇒ photodesintegration instability

=⇒ explosive O and Si burning

=⇒ all energy eaten up by photodesintegration

• massiv BH is born inside the stare

=⇒ accretion of material

=⇒ magnetic field drivenjets(≈ 1054erg)

model is not abel to explain normalGRB (→ time), but maybe a type off

gamma ray transient(GRT)

Pair instability Supernovae in Population III stars 4

Page 13: Nicolay J. Hammer- Pair Instability Supernovae and Hypernovae

AIT

13

IAATaccretion rate over BH massFryer et al. (2001)

Pair instability Supernovae in Population III stars 5

Page 14: Nicolay J. Hammer- Pair Instability Supernovae and Hypernovae

AIT

14

IAATjets inside the progenitor starHydro Group, MPA

Pair instability Supernovae in Population III stars 6

Page 15: Nicolay J. Hammer- Pair Instability Supernovae and Hypernovae

AIT

15

IAAT

Summary

• Supernova classification

• Supernova explosion mechanism

• Pair instability Hypernovae of Pop III starswithout an remnant• Jet driven Hypernovae of Pop III

• explanation for GRT/GRB

Summary 1

Page 16: Nicolay J. Hammer- Pair Instability Supernovae and Hypernovae

AIT

16

IAAT

References

Bromm V., Yoshida N., Hernquist L., 2003, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints

Fryer C.L., Woosley S.E., Heger A., 2001, ApJ 550, 372

Zimmermann H., .Weigert A., 1999, Lexikon der Astronomie, Spektrum

Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg Berlin

References 1


Recommended