+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences

Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences

Date post: 14-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: pia
View: 34 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences University of Hawaii at Manoa. Introduction. Bamboo Versatile forest based natural resource More than 1500 species described Plays an important role in the national - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
23
Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences University of Hawaii at Manoa
Transcript
Page 1: Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences

Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace

Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences

University of Hawaii at Manoa

Page 2: Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences

Introduction Bamboo

Versatile forest based natural resource More than 1500 species described Plays an important role in the national

economy of many countries, especially inthe tropics

Primarily used as a construction material

Page 3: Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences

World distribution of bambooSource: Ohrnberger 1999

Page 4: Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences

Advantages of bamboo for construction:

1. Suitable strength (fibrous texture)2. Preferential cost3. Fast growth4. Easy availability5. Light and smooth (easy to transfer)

Page 5: Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences

Bamboo (‘Ohe) in Hawaii

May have been introduced by ancient Polynesians

Approximately 70 species and varieties Mainly used for

Furniture Ornaments Construction materials-Mainly fencing, flooring Musical instruments

Page 6: Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences

Some uses of bambo0

Page 7: Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences

Coptotermes formosanus:Present in Hawaii for over 100 yearsProbably introduced from southern ChinaMajor termite pest in HawaiiWidely distributed

C. formosa

nus

Page 8: Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences

Coptotermes gestroi:Intercepted in banana shipments to Hawaii

(1934)Major pest in the Philippines and in GuamFirst discovered on Oahu in 1963 (single home)Re-discovered on Oahu in 1999Currently has limited but expanding

distribution (southwest Oahu)

C. gestroi

Page 9: Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences

Objective: To determine relative resistance of six different

bamboo species grown in Hawaii to C. formosanus and C. gestroi

Page 10: Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences

Materials and Methods Single choice (no choice) test

Standard E1-09 of the American Wood Preservation Association

Six bamboo species;1. Bambusa hirose (BH)-Hirose’s bamboo2. B. oldhamii (BO)-Giant timber bamboo3. Dendrocalamus brandisii (DB)-Sweet dragon bamboo4. D. latiflorus (DL)-Sweet giant bamboo5. Gigantocholoa pseudoarundinacea (GP)-Great giant

bamboo6. Guadua angustifolia (GA)-”Guadua”

Page 11: Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences

Wood blocks

• 2.5 x 2.5 x 0.5 cm in size Five replicates of each bamboo species with

each termite species

Set-up Polystyrene jars (height 97 mm, diameter 85

mm) Each contained 150 g silica sand, 30 ml

distilled water and bamboo block

Page 12: Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences

C. gestroi: Kalaeloa field site (9 m above sea level; annual rainfall 20.9 in; annual mean temperature 75.6 F)

C. formosanus: Miller Hall, UH Manoa (23.1 m above sea level; annual rainfall 105.2 in; annual mean temperature 69.5 F)

Page 13: Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences

200 freshly collected termites (180 workers / 20 soldiers) added to each test jar

All jars placed in an unlighted incubator for 28 days (280C)

Jars inspected each week to record termite activity and tunneling patterns

After 28 days, all jars disassembled counted live termites (workers & soldiers) to determine

mortalityreweighed blocks after oven dryingVisually rated blocks according to the 2009 AWPA rating

scale

Page 14: Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences

Results

1 2

1 2

Sample test jars:

1. C. formosanus

2. C. gestroi

Page 15: Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences

Sample visual ratings for C. formosanusRating scale: 4=very severe, 50-75% affected; 7=moderate,

10-30% affected

Page 16: Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences

Sample visual ratings for C. gestroiRating scale: 4=very severe, 50-75% affected; 7=moderate,

10-30% affected

Page 17: Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences

Summary of results for C. formosanus

a Values in parentheses are standard deviations; means within a column followed by the same letter are not significant at the 5% level (ANOVA,Tukey’s HSD).

Rating: 10 (sound), 9.5 (trace, surface nibbles permitted), 9 (slight attack up to 3% of cross sectional area affected), 8 (moderate attack, 3-10 % of cross sectional area affected), 7 (moderate/severe attack, penetration, 10-30% of cross sectional area affected), 6 (severe attack,30-50% of cross sectional area affected), 4 (very severe attack, 50-70% of cross sectional area affected) or 0 (failure).

Page 18: Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences

Summary of results for C. gestroi

a Values in parentheses are standard deviations; means within a column followed by the same letter are not significant at the 5% level (ANOVA,Tukey’s HSD).

Rating: 10 (sound), 9.5 (trace, surface nibbles permitted), 9 (slight attack up to 3% of cross sectional area affected), 8 (moderate attack, 3-10 % of cross sectional area affected), 7 (moderate/severe attack, penetration, 10-30% of cross sectional area affected), 6 (severe attack,30-50% of cross sectional area affected), 4 (very severe attack, 50-70% of cross sectional area affected) or 0 (failure).

Page 19: Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences

Mean mass loss of six different bamboo species exposed to C. formosanus or C. gestroi.

Page 20: Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences

Mean percent mortality of C. formosanus and C. gestroiafter exposure to six different bamboo species

Page 21: Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences

ConclusionsMean mass losses of bamboo due to termite feeding

for four weeks ranged from 14-29%Most resistance bamboo species were Gigantocholoa

pseudoarundinacea and Bambusa oldhamiiMost susceptible bamboo species was Guadua

angustifoliaBambusa hirose, Dendrocalamus brandisii and D.

latiflorus were intermediate in their termite resistance

Overall, there appeared to be little difference in feeding preferences between C. formosanus and C. gestroi

Page 22: Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences

Acknowledgements

Rob

Maria

Reina

Makena

Dr J. Kenneth Grace

Page 23: Nirmala K. Hapukotuwa and J. Kenneth Grace Dept. of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences

Thank you!


Recommended