+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Nitrosamines in Pharmaceuticals? No Problem! in Pharmaceutic… · ylamine (NDMA) impurity from...

Nitrosamines in Pharmaceuticals? No Problem! in Pharmaceutic… · ylamine (NDMA) impurity from...

Date post: 20-Feb-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
12
Nitrosamines in Pharmaceuticals? No Problem! Pharma Trends Shimadzu commits to contribute to Pharma society through Science and Technology Detection and control of nitrosamine impurities in drug manufacturing processes become very critical to sustain business of pharmaceutical industry. Shimadzu has standardized analytical methods capable of detecting problematic nitrosamines compounds for assisting pharma society to overcome the challenging market situation. Nitrosamine is an organic compound containing the group -NNO attached to two organic groups. Nitrosamines are found in tobacco products, tobacco smoke and many foods such as fried foods, fish, meat, beer and water. Nitrosamines are formed by reaction of secondary or tertiary amines with a nitrosating agent and some of nitrosamines are classified as probable human carcinogens. In July 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that the carcinogenic impurities: N-Nitrosodimethyl- amine (NDMA) and N-Nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) had been detected in Valsartan bulk drug substances manufactured by Chinese drug manufacturers. Valsartan is used in the treatment of high blood pressure and congestive heart failure. Subsequently, regulatory agencies including USFDA, European Medicines Agency (EMA), Health Canada, Health Science Authority, Singapore (HSA) and Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan (MHLW), are investigating presence of nitrosamines in medicines. As a result, many medicines, e.g. Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonists (ARBs), Ranitidine, Nizatidine and Metformin, have been recalled till now. This global trend is revealing the necessity for rugged and robust analytical methods to detect nitrosamines in APIs and medicines. Shimadzu introduces rugged and robust analytical methods for nitrosamines in Sartans and Ranitidine. The methods have been standardized on the Shimadzu GCMS-TQ8050 NX, LCMS-8045 and LCMS-9030. [email protected]
Transcript
  • Nitrosamines in Pharmaceuticals? No Problem!

    Pharma Trends

    Shimadzu commits to contribute to Pharma society through Science and Technology

    Detection and control of nitrosamine impurities in drug manufacturing processes become very critical to sustain business of pharmaceutical industry. Shimadzu has standardized analytical methods capable of detecting problematic nitrosamines compounds for assisting pharma society to overcome the challenging market situation. Nitrosamine is an organic compound containing the group -NNO attached to two organic groups. Nitrosamines are found in tobacco products, tobacco smoke and many foods such as fried foods, fish, meat, beer and water. Nitrosamines are formed by reaction of secondary or tertiary amines with a nitrosating agent and some of nitrosamines are classified as probable human carcinogens. In July 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that the carcinogenic impurities: N-Nitrosodimethyl-amine (NDMA) and N-Nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) had been detected in Valsartan bulk drug substances manufactured by Chinese drug manufacturers. Valsartan is used in the treatment of high blood pressure and congestive heart failure.

    Subsequently, regulatory agencies including USFDA, European Medicines Agency (EMA), Health Canada, Health Science Authority, Singapore (HSA) and Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan (MHLW), are investigating presence of nitrosamines in medicines. As a result, many medicines, e.g. Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonists (ARBs), Ranitidine, Nizatidine and Metformin, have been recalled till now. This global trend is revealing the necessity for rugged and robust analytical methods to detect nitrosamines in APIs and medicines.Shimadzu introduces rugged and robust analytical methods for nitrosamines in Sartans and Ranitidine. The methods have been standardized on the Shimadzu GCMS-TQ8050 NX, LCMS-8045 and LCMS-9030.

    [email protected]

  • Nitrosamines in Pharmaceuticals? No Problem!

    LC-MS/MS for the Determination of NDMA in Ranitidine Drug Substance as per reference from USFDA method.

    BackgroundOn September 13, 2019, the FDA announced that preliminary tests found low levels of N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) in ranitidine, a heartburn medication used by millions of people. This impurity is classified as a probable human carcinogen and is believed to have been introduced into the finished products as a result of the manufacturing process. LC-MS/MS method may be used as an alternative or confirmatory method for the liquid chromatography high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) method detailed in FY19-177DPA-S (US FDA) can also be adopted. The TQ (Triple Quadrupole) method is more widely available than the LC-HRMS platform previously shared by the USFDA agency.

    PrincipleReverse phase analysis is used for the separation of N-Nitrosodimeth-ylamine (NDMA) impurity from Ranitidine. MRM method has been developed for the NDMA wherein 75 > 43 is used as a quantifier ion

    and 75 > 58 is used as a qualifier ion. Internal standard method is used for the quantification of NDMA in sample.

    Conclusions

    LC-MS/MS method was developed and validated following ICH Q2 (R1) for the detection and quantitation of NDMA in Ranitidine drug as per USFDA protocol. The limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantitation (LOQ) and range of the method are summarized in Table 1. NDMA

    Description Unit NDMA

    LODng/mL 0.300

    ppm 0.010

    LOQng/mL 1.000

    ppm 0.033

    Rangeng/mL 1.0-100

    ppm 0.033- 3.33 Table 1: LOD,LOQ for NDMA

    Reagents

    NDMA Reference Standard • Formic acid, ULCMS make (BIOSOLVE) • Methanol, LC/MS grade (JT baker) • Water, LC/MS grade (JT Baker)

    Instrument

    N-Series UHPLC with LCMS-8045 system.

    Highlighted Features

    • Best in Class Sensitivity (UFsensitivity)

    • World Fastest Scanning Speed: 30,000 u /sec (UFscanning)

    • World Fastest Polarity Switching Rate: 5 msec (UFswitching)

    Mobile Phase Preparation• Mobile phase A (0.1% formic

    acid in water): mix formic acid and water at a volume ratio of 1:1000

    HPLC Column

    Shim pack GISS C18 (250 mm x 4.6 mm, 5 micron) (P/N :227-30061-07)

    Column Temperature 30°C

    Flow Rate 0.6mL/min

    Mobile Phase A 0.1% Formic acid in Water

    Mobile Phase B 0.1% Formic acid in Methanol

    Gradient Time (Min) A% B%

    0 95 5

    5 95 5

    15 10 90

    18 10 90

    18.1 95 5

    25 95 5

    Injection Volume 10uL

    Autosampler Temp. 5°C

    Table 2: Analytical Conditions for NDMA

    Interface Parameters

    Interface/Polarity : APCI/Positive

    Nebulizing Gas Flow : 3.00 L

    Interface Temperature : 350 ˚C

    DL Temperature : 200 ˚C

    Heating Block Temperature : 200 ˚C

    Drying Gas Flow : 5.00 L

    Target : NDMA : 75.20 > 43.00 (Quantifier); 75.20 > 58.00 (Qualifier)

    ISTD : NDMA-D6 : 81.10 > 46.10

    Time (Min) Divert Valve Position

    0 1

    10 0

    MRM parameters

    Divert Valve settings

    Note: Position 1 – To Mass; Position 0 – To Waste.

    Fig. 1: LCMS-8045 Table 3: Mass Spectrometer Conditions in LCMS-8045

    Figure 1: LCMS-8045 system

    Highlighted Feature

    ✓ Best in Class Sensitivity (UFsensitivity) ✓ World Fastest Scanning Speed: 30,000 u /sec (UFscanning) ✓ World Fastest Polarity Switching Rate: 5 msec (UFswitching)

    Mobile Phase Preparation

    • Mobile phase A (0.1% formic acid in water): mix formic acid and water at a volume ratio of 1:1000

    • Mobile phase B (0.1% formic acid in methanol): mix formic acid and methanol at a volume ratio of 1:1000

    Diluent and Blank: Water

    Mixed Intermediate Stock Standard preparation (100 ng/mL)

    • Prepare a 100 ng/mL intermediate stock standard solution in water using commercially available nitrosamine standards reference stock standard solution.

    Linearity standards Preparation

    • Linearity standards of mixed nitrosamines were prepared from 0.25ng/mL to 100 ng/mL levels. Spiked each level with two internal standards NDMA-D6 & NDEA-D10 so that resultant concentration of the internal standards would be 10ng/mL.

    Metformin drug sample preparation

    • Accurately weigh 100 mg of drug substance into a 2 mL of effendroff tube. • Dissolve completely in 1mL of water. • Filter through 0.2 µm syringe filter in HPLC vial.

    [email protected] 2

  • Nitrosamines in Pharmaceuticals? No Problem!

    Figure 8: Comparison between UV Chromatogram (at 254nm) of Ranitidine and MRM of NDMA

    NDMA peak is well separated from ranitidine drug. Ranitidine API peak is diverted to the waste by using divert valve to avoid the contamination of Mass spectrometer.

    Figure 9A: Blank Figure 9B : NDMA (1.0 ng/mL standard)

    1.36e4Q 75.20>43.00 (+)

    RT (min)7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5

    1.2e4

    1.2e4

    1.3e4

    1.3e4

    1.4e4

    1.4e4

    1.5e4

    1.5e4

    1.6e4

    1.35e4 Q 75.20>43.00 (+)

    R1 21.04% (NC)

    RT=8.063

    RT (min) 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 1.1e4 1.1e4 1.2e4 1.2e4 1.3e4 1.3e4 1.4e4 1.4e4 1.5e4 1.5e4 1.6e4 1.6e4 1.7e4

    Figure 8: Comparison between UV Chromatogram (at 254nm) of Ranitidine and MRM of NDMA

    NDMA peak is well separated from ranitidine drug. Ranitidine API peak is diverted to the waste by using divert valve to avoid the contamination of Mass spectrometer.

    Figure 9A: Blank Figure 9B : NDMA (1.0 ng/mL standard)

    1.36e4Q 75.20>43.00 (+)

    RT (min)7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5

    1.2e4

    1.2e4

    1.3e4

    1.3e4

    1.4e4

    1.4e4

    1.5e4

    1.5e4

    1.6e4

    1.35e4 Q 75.20>43.00 (+)

    R1 21.04% (NC)

    RT=8.063

    RT (min) 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 1.1e4 1.1e4 1.2e4 1.2e4 1.3e4 1.3e4 1.4e4 1.4e4 1.5e4 1.5e4 1.6e4 1.6e4 1.7e4

    Figure 9C: NDMA-D6 Figure 9D: Calibration Curve (1 – 100 ng/mL)

    Blank chromatogram does not show any interference at the retention time of NDMA as shown in figure 9A and 9B. Calibration curve was performed by using internal standard method with coefficient of correlation of 0.999 over a range of 1.0 to 100.0 ng/mL (refer figure 9D). Recovery study was performed by spiking LOQ level in the ranitidine sample and it was found to be well within the criteria.

    In continuation to above work, Shimadzu lab, mumbai has developed the in-house method to determine NDMA in Ranitidine by using LCMS-8045 system, wherein LOQ achieved is up to 0.005 ppm / LOD level of 0.002 ppm in ranitidine. For further information please contact us on [email protected].

    LC-HRMS method for the determination of NDMA in Ranitidine drug substance as per reference from USFDA method

    Background about NDMA in Ranitidine:

    Ranitidine HCl is a prescription and over the counter medication used to treat acid reflux. The drug is a histamine-2 receptor antagonist (acid inhibitor or H2 blocker). Some of the common H2 receptor blockers include: Ranitidine (Zantac), Nizatidine (Acid), Famotidine (Pepcid, Pepcid AC) and Cimetidine (Tagamet, Tagamet HB). As GC based methods had been observed to elevate NDMA levels in tested materials an alternative method which prevents the degradation of ranitidine and the subsequent formation of NDMA was therefore needed. A liquid chromatography with high resolution mass spectrometer (LC-HRMS) was developed to measure the levels of NDMA in ranitidine drug substance.

    Purpose

    This method will be used to quantitate N-nitroso-di-methylamine (NDMA) impurity in ranitidine drug substance as per reference from USFDA protocol.

    Principle

    Conc.Ratio (ppb)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    55

    60

    65

    NDMAy = 0.6699354x + 0.04647662R² = 0.9991052 R = 0.9995525

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: 1/CZero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 6.947008e-001SD RF: 7.724404e-002%RSD: 11.119038

    3.06e3 ISTD 81.10>46.10 (+)

    RT=7.954

    RT (min) 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 0.0e0 5.0e2 1.0e3 1.5e3 2.0e3 2.5e3 3.0e3 3.5e3 4.0e3 4.5e3 5.0e3 5.5e3 6.0e3

    Results and Discussion

    Fig. 2: Comparison between UV Chromatogram (at 254nm) of Ranitidine and MRM of NDMA

    NDMA peak is well separated from ranitidine drug. Ranitidine API peak is diverted to the waste by using divert valve to avoid the contamination of Mass spectrometer.

    • It was observed that MRMtransition of NDMA 75

  • Nitrosamines in Pharmaceuticals? No Problem!

    LC-MS/MS method for the determination of NDMA, NDEA, NDIPA, NMBA, NEIPA and NDBA in Valsartan Drug Substance as per reference from USFDA method

    BackgroundIn July 2018, the American Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that the carcinogenic impurities: Nitrosamines (N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) and N-Nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA)) had been detected in Valsartan bulk drug substances manufactured by Chinese manufacturers. Subsequently, a worldwide recall was issued of pharmaceutical products that use Valsartan bulk drug substances. Valsartan is used in the treatment of high blood pressure and congestive heart failure.

    This LC-MS/MS method is used for the quantitation of six nitrosamines in Valsartan drug substance. The impurities are : N-Nitroso-dimethylamine (NDMA), N-Nitroso-dieth-ylamine (NDEA), N-Nitroso-N-methyl-4-aminobutyric acid (NMBA), N-Nitroso-ethyl isopropylamine (NEIPA), N-Nitroso-di-isopropylamine (NDIPA) and N-Nitroso-dibutylamine (NDBA)

    PrincipleReverse phase analysis is used for the separation of NDMA, NDEA, NMBA, NDIPA, NEIPA and NDBA impurities from valsartan. MRM method is developed for the all six nitrosamines. Two different Internal standards method is used for the quantification of NDMA in sample.

    ConclusionsAn LC-MS/MS method was developed and validated following ICH Q2 (R1), for the detection and quantitation of six nitrosamines in Valsartan drug as USFDA protocol. The limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantitation (LOQ) and range of the method are summarized in Table 4.

    ReagentsReference Standards for NDMA, NDEA, NMBA, NDIPA, NEIPA and NDBA • Formic acid, ULCMS make (BIOSOLVE) • Methanol, LC/MS grade (JT baker) • Water, LC/MS grade (JT Baker)

    Diluent and Blank: Water

    NDMA Intermediate Stock Standard preparation (100 ng/mL)

    • Prepare a 100 ng/mL intermediate stock standard solution in water using commercially available NDMA reference stock standard solution.

    Working Standard Solution Preparation (1.0 ng/mL)

    • Transfer a 1.0 mL aliquot volume of the intermediate stock standard into a 100 mL volumetric flask and dilute to volume with water. Prepare fresh daily.

    Ranitidine drug sample preparation

    • Accurately weigh 120 mg of drug substance into a 15 mL centrifuge tube. Add 4.0 mL of water and mix the solution using a vortex mixer until dissolved.

    • Filter it using a 0.22 μm PVDF syringe filter in HPLC vial.

    Mass Spectrometer conditions

    • Instrument

    Shimadzu LCMS-8045 Triple Quad LC/MS system with APCI source (Figure 1).

    Blank chromatogram does not show any interference at the retention time of NDMA as shown in Figures 3A and 3B. Calibration curve was performed by using internal standard method with coefficient of correlation of 0.999 over a range of 1.0 to 100.0 ng/mL (Figure 3D). Recovery study was performed by spiking LOQ level in the ranitidine sample and it was found to be well within the criteria.

    In continuation to above work, Shimadzu Labs, Mumbai have developed the in-house method to determine NDMA in Ranitidine by using LCMS-8045 system, wherein LOQ achieved is up to 0.005 ppm / LOD level of 0.002 ppm in Ranitidine.

    Description Unit NDMA NDEA NMBA NDIPA NEIPA NDBA

    LODng/mL 0.250 0.100 0.250 0.100 0.050 0.250

    ppm 0.0025 0.0010 0.0025 0.0010 0.0005 0.0025

    LOQng/mL 0.50 0.25 0.50 0.25 0.10 0.50

    ppm 0.0050 0.0025 0.0050 0.0025 0.0010 0.0050

    Rangeng/mL 0.50-100 0.25-100 0.50-100 0.25-100 0.10-100 0.50-100

    ppm 0.005-0.10 0.0025-0.10 0.005-0.10 0.0025-0.10 0.001-0.10 0.005-0.10

    Table 4: LOD, LOQ Values for 6 Nitrosamines in Valsartan

    [email protected] 4

  • Nitrosamines in Pharmaceuticals? No Problem!

    InstrumentN-Series UHPLC with LCMS-8045 system.

    Mobile Phase Preparation• Mobile phase A (0.1% formic acid in water): mix formic acid and

    water at a volume ratio of 1:1000 • Mobile phase B (0.1% formic acid in methanol): mix formic acid

    and methanol at a volume ratio of 1:1000

    Diluent and Blank: Water: Methanol (50:50) v/vMixed Intermediate Stock Standard preparation (100 ng/mL) • Prepare a 100 ng/mL intermediate stock standard solution in water

    using commercially available nitrosamine standards reference stock standard solution.

    Working Standard Solution Preparation (1.0 ng/mL) • Transfer a 1.0 mL aliquot volume of the intermediate stock

    standard into a 100 mL volumetric flask and dilute to volume with water. Prepare fresh daily.

    Valsartan drug sample preparation • Accurately weigh 100 mg of drug substance into a

    2 mL eppendorf tube.• Dissolve completely in water: Methanol mixture.• Further add 0.050 mL of mixture of internal standards of having

    concentration 100 ng/mL and vortex.• Centrifuge at 10000 RPM at 150C for 10 minutes.• Filter through 0.2 µm PVDF syringe filter in HPLC vial.

    HPLC Column

    Shim pack Velox PFPP (100 mm x 4.6 mm, 2.7 micron) (P/N :227-32023-03)

    Column Temperature 40 °CFlow Rate 0.5mL/minMobile Phase A 0.1% Formic acid in WaterMobile Phase B 0.1% Formic acid in MethanolGradient Time (Min) A% B%

    0.00 60 403.00 45 556.50 45 558.20 35 65

    10.00 35 6510.10 10 9013.00 10 9013.10 60 4015.00 60 40

    Injection Volume 20uLAutosampler Temp. 5 °C

    Table 5: Analytical Conditions (LC) for 6 Nitrosamines in Valsartan

    Time (Min) Divert Valve Position

    0 1

    7.5 0

    Table 6: Analytical Conditions (MS) for 6 Nitrosamines in Valsartan

    Target : NEIPA: 117.20 > 75.10 (Quantifier); 117.20 > 27.10 (Qualifier) Target : NDBA: 159.00 > 29.20 (Quantifier); 159.00 > 103.00 (Qualifier) ISTD 1 : NDMA-D6: 81.10 > 46.10 ISTD 2 : NDEA-D10: 113.10 > 81.15

    • Divert Valve settings

    Time (Min) Divert Valve Position 0 1

    7.5 0 Note: Position 1 – To Mass; Position 0 – To Waste.

    Table 11. Analytical Conditions (MS) for 6 Nitrosamines in Valsartan

    Results and Discussion

    Figure 13: Comparison between UV Chromatogram (at 254nm) of Valsartan and MRM of NDMA, NDEA, NMBA, NDIPA, NEIPA and NDBA

    All six nitrosamine peaks are well separated from valsartan drug. Valsartan API peak is diverted to the waste by using divert valve to avoid the contamination of Mass spectrometer.

    Interface Parameters

    Interface/Polarity : APCI/Positive

    Nebulizing Gas Flow : 3.00 L

    Interface Temperature : 350 ˚C

    DL Temperature : 200 ˚C

    Heating Block Temperature : 200 ˚C

    Drying Gas Flow : 5.00 L

    Target : NDMA: 75.20 > 43.00 (Quantifier); 75.20 > 58.00 (Qualifier)

    Target : NDEA: 103.00 > 29.00 (Quantifier); 103.00 > 75.10 (Qualifier)

    Target : NMBA: 146.90 > 117.15 (Quantifier); 147.00 > 44.10 (Qualifier)

    Target : NDIPA: 131.20 > 89.05 (Quantifier); 131.20 > 43.10 (Qualifier)

    Target : NEIPA: 117.20 > 75.10 (Quantifier); 117.20 > 27.10 (Qualifier)

    Target : NDBA: 159.00 > 29.20 (Quantifier); 159.00 > 103.00 (Qualifier)

    ISTD 1 : NDMA-D6: 81.10 > 46.10

    ISTD 2 : NDEA-D10: 113.10 > 81.15

    MRM parameters

    Divert Valve settings

    Results and Discussion

    Fig. 4: Comparison between UV Chromatogram (at 254nm) of Valsartan and MRM of NDMA, NDEA, NMBA, NDIPA, NEIPA and NDBA

    [email protected]

  • Nitrosamines in Pharmaceuticals? No Problem!

    Figure 14A: Calibration curve of NDMA Figure 14B: Calibration curve of NDEA

    Figure 14C: Calibration curve of NMBA Figure 14D: Calibration curve of NDIPA

    Conc.Ratio (ppb)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    55

    60

    65

    70 NDMAy = 0.6263549x - 0.08186809R² = 0.9941034 R = 0.9970473

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: 1/C^2Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 5.877746e-001SD RF: 7.100993e-002%RSD: 12.081149

    Conc.Ratio (ppb)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15NDEAy = 0.1424435x - 0.004227572R² = 0.9965480 R = 0.9982725

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: 1/C^2Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 1.387937e-001SD RF: 9.298783e-003%RSD: 6.699715

    Conc.Ratio (ppb)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    55

    60NMBA y = 0.5504446x - 0.003653506R² = 0.9928172 R = 0.9964021

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: 1/C^2Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 5.472904e-001SD RF: 4.135700e-002%RSD: 7.556684

    Conc.Ratio (ppb)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    20

    22

    24

    26 NDIPAy = 0.2376013x - 0.004600544R² = 0.9960155 R = 0.9980058

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: Default (1/C^2)Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 2.294262e-001SD RF: 1.990861e-002%RSD: 8.677570

    Figure 14E: Calibration curve of NEIPA Figure 14F: Calibration curve of NDBA

    Calibration curves were performed by using internal standard method with coefficient of correlation of 0.999 over the linearity range (refer figure 14). Recovery study was performed by spiking 0.005ppm in the valsartan sample and it was found to be well within the criteria.

    For further information please contact us on [email protected] .

    References

    [1] Control of nitrosamine impurities in sartans: revision of five Ph. Eur.Monographs https://www.edqm.eu/en/news/control-nitrosamine-impurities-sartans-revision-five-ph-eur monographs [2] GC/MS Headspace Method for Detection of NDMA in Valsartan Drug Substance and Drug Products https://www.fda.gov/media/115965/download [3] LC-HRMS Method for the Determination of NDMA in Ranitidine Drug Substance and Drug Product https://www.fda.gov/media/130801/download [4] Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) Method for the Determination of NDMA in Ranitidine Drug Substance https://www.fda.gov/media/131868/download [4] Analysis of Nitrosamines in Sartan-Type Bulk Drug Substances https://www.shimadzu.com/an/pharmaceuticallifescience/ndma.html

    Conc.Ratio (ppb)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    20

    22

    24

    26

    28

    30

    32NIEPAy = 0.2964796x - 0.002722954R² = 0.9946540 R = 0.9973234

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: Default (1/C^2)Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 2.871300e-001SD RF: 2.608968e-002%RSD: 9.086367

    Conc.Ratio (ppb)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    NDBAy = 0.1266520x - 0.004559929R² = 0.9957904 R = 0.9978930

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: Default (1/C^2)Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 1.245031e-001SD RF: 7.828579e-003%RSD: 6.287859

    All six nitrosamine peaks are well separated from valsartan drug. Valsartan API peak is diverted to the waste by using divert valve to avoid the contamination of Mass spectrometer. Calibration curves were performed by using internal standard method with coefficient of correlation of 0.999 over the linearity range (Figure 5). Recovery study was performed by spiking 0.005 ppm in the valsartan sample and it was found to be well within the criteria.

    Liquid Chromatography- Triple Quadrupole (LC-MS/MS) method for the determination of NDMA, NDEA, NDIPA, NMBA, NEIPA and NDBA in Metformin Drug SubstanceBackground Singapore’s Health Sciences Authority (HSA) on 4th December 2019, recalled three out of 46 locally marketed metformin medicines after determining they contained NDMA 'above the internationally acceptable level' and this subject came into mainstream. Subsequently, both the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have released regular updated into their investigations into the causes of medicine contamination.

    Metformin is the first-line drug control of high blood sugar levels in patients with type 2 diabetes, particularly in people who are overweight.

    This LC-MS/MS method is used for the quantitation of six nitrosamines in Metformin drug substance.

    Purpose: This method will be used to quantitate N-nitroso-di-methylamine (NDMA), N-nitroso-di-ethyl amine (NDEA), N-nitroso-N-methyl-4-aminobutyric acid (NMBA), N-nitroso-ethyl iso-propylamine (NEIPA), N-nitroso-di-iso-propylamine (NDIPA), and N-nitroso-di-butylamine NDBA impurities in Metformin drug substance.

    PrincipleReverse phase analysis is used for the separation of NDMA, NDEA, NMBA, NDIPA, NEIPA and NDBA impurities from metformin. MRM method is developed for all six nitrosamines. Two different Internal standards were used for the quantification of these six nitrosamines in metformin.

    Conclusions A LC-MS/MS method was developed for the detection and quantitation of six nitrosamines in Metformin drug. The limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantitation (LOQ) and range of the method are summarized in Table 7:

    Description Unit NDMA NDEA NMBA NDIPA NEIPA NDBA

    LODng/mL 0.250 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100

    ppm 0.0025 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010

    LOQng/mL 0.50 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25

    ppm 0.005 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025 0.0025

    Rangeng/mL 0.50-100 0.25-100 0.25-100 0.25-100 0.25-100 0.25-100

    ppm 0.0050-1.0 0.0025-1.0 0.0025-1.0 0.0025-1.0 0.0025-1.0 0.0025-1.0

    Fig. 5A: Calibration curve of NDMA Fig. 5B: Calibration curve of NDEA

    Fig. 5C: Calibration curve of NMBA Fig. 5D: Calibration curve of NDIPA

    Fig. 5E: Calibration curve of NEIPA Fig. 5F: Calibration curve of NDBA

    Table 7: LOD, LOQ for NDMA, NDEA, NDIPA, NMBA, NEIPA & NDBA in Metformin

    [email protected] 6

  • Nitrosamines in Pharmaceuticals? No Problem!

    Reagents Reference Standards for NDMA, NDEA, NMBA, NDIPA, NEIPA and NDBA • Formic acid, ULCMS make (BIOSOLVE) • Methanol, LC/MS grade (JT baker) • Water, LC/MS grade (JT Baker)

    InstrumentN-Series UHPLC with LCMS-8045 system.

    Figure 1: LCMS-8045 system

    Highlighted Feature

    ✓ Best in Class Sensitivity (UFsensitivity) ✓ World Fastest Scanning Speed: 30,000 u /sec (UFscanning) ✓ World Fastest Polarity Switching Rate: 5 msec (UFswitching)

    Mobile Phase Preparation

    • Mobile phase A (0.1% formic acid in water): mix formic acid and water at a volume ratio of 1:1000

    • Mobile phase B (0.1% formic acid in methanol): mix formic acid and methanol at a volume ratio of 1:1000

    Diluent and Blank: Water

    Mixed Intermediate Stock Standard preparation (100 ng/mL)

    • Prepare a 100 ng/mL intermediate stock standard solution in water using commercially available nitrosamine standards reference stock standard solution.

    Linearity standards Preparation

    • Linearity standards of mixed nitrosamines were prepared from 0.25ng/mL to 100 ng/mL levels. Spiked each level with two internal standards NDMA-D6 & NDEA-D10 so that resultant concentration of the internal standards would be 10ng/mL.

    Metformin drug sample preparation

    • Accurately weigh 100 mg of drug substance into a 2 mL of effendroff tube. • Dissolve completely in 1mL of water. • Filter through 0.2 µm syringe filter in HPLC vial.

    Fig. 6: LCMS-8045 system

    Highlighted Feature• Best in Class Sensitivity (UFSensitivity)• World Fastest Scanning Speed: 30,000 u/sec

    (UFScanning)• World Fastest Polarity Switching Rate: 5 msec

    (UFSwitching)

    Mobile Phase Preparation• Mobile phase A (0.1% formic acid in water):

    mix formic acid and water at a volume ratio of 1:1000

    • Mobile phase B (0.1% formic acid in methanol): mix formic acid and methanol at a volume ratio of 1:1000

    Diluent and Blank: Water

    Mixed Intermediate Stock Standard preparation (100 ng/mL)

    • Prepare a 100 ng/mL intermediate stock standard solution in water using commercially available nitrosamine standards reference stock standard solution.

    Linearity standards Preparation • Linearity standards of mixed nitrosamines were

    prepared from 0.25 ng/mL to 100 ng/mL levels. Spiked each level with two internal standards NDMA-D6 & NDEA-D10 so that resultant concentration of the internal standards would be 10 ng/mL.

    Metformin drug sample preparation • Accurately weigh 100 mg of drug

    substance into a 2 mL of effendroff tube.• Dissolve completely in 1mL of water.• Filter through 0.2 µm syringe filter in

    HPLC vial.Analytical Conditions

    HPLC ColumnShim-pack GIST (100 mm x 4.6 mm, 2.7 micron) (P/N :227-30017-07)

    Column Temperature 30°C

    Flow Rate 0.7mL/min

    Mobile Phase A 0.1% Formic acid in Water

    Mobile Phase B 0.1% Formic acid in Methanol

    Gradient Time (Min) A% B%

    2.00 95 05

    6.00 90 10

    12.00 10 90

    15.00 10 90

    15.01 95 05

    18.00 95 05

    Injection Volume 30uL

    Autosampler Temp. 5°C

    Mass Spectrometer conditions•Instrument

    Shimadzu LCMS-8045 Triple Quad LC/MS system with APCI source (refer Figure 6)

    • Ion Source SettingsInterface Parameters

    Interface/Polarity : APCI/Positive

    Nebulizing Gas Flow : 3.00 L

    Interface Temperature : 350˚C

    DL Temperature : 200˚C

    Heating Block Temperature : 200˚C

    Drying Gas Flow : 5.00 L

    •MRM parametersTarget : NDMA: 75.20 > 43.10 (Quantifier); 75.20 > 58.10 (Qualifier)

    Target : NDEA: 103.00 > 29.20 (Quantifier); 103.20 > 75.10 (Qualifier)

    Target : NMBA: 146.80 > 117.25 (Quantifier); 147.00 > 44.00 (Qualifier)

    Target : NDIPA: 131.10 > 89.05 (Quantifier); 131.10 > 43.20 (Qualifier)

    Target : NEIPA: 117.00 > 75.10 (Quantifier); 117.20 > 27.20 (Qualifier)

    Target : NDBA: 159.10 > 29.10 (Quantifier); 159.00 > 103.10 (Qualifier)

    ISTD 1 : NDMA-D6: 81.10 > 46.10

    ISTD 2 : NDEA-D10: 113.10 > 81.15

    •Divert Valve settingsTime (Min) Divert Valve Position

    0.0 0

    5.0 1

    Note: Position 1 – To Mass; Position 0 – To Waste.

    Table 9: MS Parameters

    Table 8: Analytical Conditions

    [email protected]

  • Nitrosamines in Pharmaceuticals? No Problem!

    Results and Discussion

    All six nitrosamine peaks are well separated from metformin drug (refer Figure 7). Metformin API peak is diverted to the waste by using divert valve to avoid the contamination of Mass spectrometer.

    • Divert Valve settings

    Time (Min) Divert Valve Position 0.0 0 5.0 1

    Note: Position 1 – To Mass; Position 0 – To Waste.

    Results and Discussion

    All six nitrosamine peaks are well separated from metformin drug (refer figure 2). Metformin API peak is diverted to the waste by using divert valve to avoid the contamination of Mass spectrometer.

    Figure 2: Comparison between UV Chromatogram (at 254nm) of Metformin and MRM of NDMA, NDEA, NMBA, NDIPA, NEIPA and NDBA

    Fig. 7: Comparison between UV Chromatogram (at 254nm) of Metformin and MRM of NDMA, NDEA, NMBA, NDIPA, NEIPA and NDBA

    Calibration curves were performed by using internal standard method with regression coefficient of > 0.99 over the linearity range (refer Figure 8). Recovery study was performed by spiking 0.005 ppm in the metformin sample and it was found to be well within the criteria.

    Figure 3A: Calibration curve of NDMA Figure 3B: Calibration curve of NDEA

    Figure 3C: Calibration curve of NMBA Figure 3D: Calibration curve of NDIPA

    Figure 3E: Calibration curve of NEIPA Figure 3F: Calibration curve of NDBA

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    5.5

    6.0

    6.5

    7.0NDMAy = 0.06648504x - 0.01570569R² = 0.9992424 R = 0.9996211

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: Default (1/C)Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 6.251375e-002SD RF: 4.681896e-003%RSD: 7.489387

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8

    2.0

    2.2

    2.4

    2.6

    2.8

    3.0 NDEAy = 0.02903289x - 0.0007750937R² = 0.9996266 R = 0.9998133

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: Default (1/C)Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 2.836373e-002SD RF: 1.021012e-003%RSD: 3.599710

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18 NMBA y = 0.1800639x + 0.01312147R² = 0.9961896 R = 0.9980930

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: 1/AZero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 1.914961e-001SD RF: 1.085115e-002%RSD: 5.666514

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    5.5

    6.0 NDIPAy = 0.06269403x - 0.0004824934R² = 0.9975311 R = 0.9987648

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: 1/A^2Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 6.248723e-002SD RF: 2.758088e-003%RSD: 4.413843

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    5.5

    6.0

    6.5

    7.0NIEPAy = 0.06671144x - 0.00007999886R² = 0.9988484 R = 0.9994240

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: 1/C^2Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 6.664237e-002SD RF: 1.989627e-003%RSD: 2.985528

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8

    2.0

    2.2

    2.4

    2.6

    2.8

    3.0

    3.2

    3.4

    3.6

    3.8

    4.0 NDBAy = 0.03943897x + 0.0009477200R² = 0.9985460 R = 0.9992727

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: Default (1/C)Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 4.025716e-002SD RF: 1.404429e-003%RSD: 3.488645

    Figure 3A: Calibration curve of NDMA Figure 3B: Calibration curve of NDEA

    Figure 3C: Calibration curve of NMBA Figure 3D: Calibration curve of NDIPA

    Figure 3E: Calibration curve of NEIPA Figure 3F: Calibration curve of NDBA

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    5.5

    6.0

    6.5

    7.0NDMAy = 0.06648504x - 0.01570569R² = 0.9992424 R = 0.9996211

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: Default (1/C)Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 6.251375e-002SD RF: 4.681896e-003%RSD: 7.489387

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8

    2.0

    2.2

    2.4

    2.6

    2.8

    3.0 NDEAy = 0.02903289x - 0.0007750937R² = 0.9996266 R = 0.9998133

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: Default (1/C)Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 2.836373e-002SD RF: 1.021012e-003%RSD: 3.599710

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18 NMBA y = 0.1800639x + 0.01312147R² = 0.9961896 R = 0.9980930

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: 1/AZero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 1.914961e-001SD RF: 1.085115e-002%RSD: 5.666514

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    5.5

    6.0 NDIPAy = 0.06269403x - 0.0004824934R² = 0.9975311 R = 0.9987648

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: 1/A^2Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 6.248723e-002SD RF: 2.758088e-003%RSD: 4.413843

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    5.5

    6.0

    6.5

    7.0NIEPAy = 0.06671144x - 0.00007999886R² = 0.9988484 R = 0.9994240

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: 1/C^2Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 6.664237e-002SD RF: 1.989627e-003%RSD: 2.985528

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8

    2.0

    2.2

    2.4

    2.6

    2.8

    3.0

    3.2

    3.4

    3.6

    3.8

    4.0 NDBAy = 0.03943897x + 0.0009477200R² = 0.9985460 R = 0.9992727

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: Default (1/C)Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 4.025716e-002SD RF: 1.404429e-003%RSD: 3.488645

    Figure 3A: Calibration curve of NDMA Figure 3B: Calibration curve of NDEA

    Figure 3C: Calibration curve of NMBA Figure 3D: Calibration curve of NDIPA

    Figure 3E: Calibration curve of NEIPA Figure 3F: Calibration curve of NDBA

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    5.5

    6.0

    6.5

    7.0NDMAy = 0.06648504x - 0.01570569R² = 0.9992424 R = 0.9996211

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: Default (1/C)Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 6.251375e-002SD RF: 4.681896e-003%RSD: 7.489387

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8

    2.0

    2.2

    2.4

    2.6

    2.8

    3.0 NDEAy = 0.02903289x - 0.0007750937R² = 0.9996266 R = 0.9998133

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: Default (1/C)Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 2.836373e-002SD RF: 1.021012e-003%RSD: 3.599710

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18 NMBA y = 0.1800639x + 0.01312147R² = 0.9961896 R = 0.9980930

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: 1/AZero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 1.914961e-001SD RF: 1.085115e-002%RSD: 5.666514

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    5.5

    6.0 NDIPAy = 0.06269403x - 0.0004824934R² = 0.9975311 R = 0.9987648

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: 1/A^2Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 6.248723e-002SD RF: 2.758088e-003%RSD: 4.413843

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    5.5

    6.0

    6.5

    7.0NIEPAy = 0.06671144x - 0.00007999886R² = 0.9988484 R = 0.9994240

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: 1/C^2Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 6.664237e-002SD RF: 1.989627e-003%RSD: 2.985528

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8

    2.0

    2.2

    2.4

    2.6

    2.8

    3.0

    3.2

    3.4

    3.6

    3.8

    4.0 NDBAy = 0.03943897x + 0.0009477200R² = 0.9985460 R = 0.9992727

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: Default (1/C)Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 4.025716e-002SD RF: 1.404429e-003%RSD: 3.488645

    Fig. 8A: Calibration curve of NDMA

    Fig. 8B: Calibration curve of NDEA

    Figure 3A: Calibration curve of NDMA Figure 3B: Calibration curve of NDEA

    Figure 3C: Calibration curve of NMBA Figure 3D: Calibration curve of NDIPA

    Figure 3E: Calibration curve of NEIPA Figure 3F: Calibration curve of NDBA

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    5.5

    6.0

    6.5

    7.0NDMAy = 0.06648504x - 0.01570569R² = 0.9992424 R = 0.9996211

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: Default (1/C)Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 6.251375e-002SD RF: 4.681896e-003%RSD: 7.489387

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8

    2.0

    2.2

    2.4

    2.6

    2.8

    3.0 NDEAy = 0.02903289x - 0.0007750937R² = 0.9996266 R = 0.9998133

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: Default (1/C)Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 2.836373e-002SD RF: 1.021012e-003%RSD: 3.599710

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18 NMBA y = 0.1800639x + 0.01312147R² = 0.9961896 R = 0.9980930

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: 1/AZero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 1.914961e-001SD RF: 1.085115e-002%RSD: 5.666514

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    5.5

    6.0 NDIPAy = 0.06269403x - 0.0004824934R² = 0.9975311 R = 0.9987648

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: 1/A^2Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 6.248723e-002SD RF: 2.758088e-003%RSD: 4.413843

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    5.5

    6.0

    6.5

    7.0NIEPAy = 0.06671144x - 0.00007999886R² = 0.9988484 R = 0.9994240

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: 1/C^2Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 6.664237e-002SD RF: 1.989627e-003%RSD: 2.985528

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8

    2.0

    2.2

    2.4

    2.6

    2.8

    3.0

    3.2

    3.4

    3.6

    3.8

    4.0 NDBAy = 0.03943897x + 0.0009477200R² = 0.9985460 R = 0.9992727

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: Default (1/C)Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 4.025716e-002SD RF: 1.404429e-003%RSD: 3.488645

    Figure 3A: Calibration curve of NDMA Figure 3B: Calibration curve of NDEA

    Figure 3C: Calibration curve of NMBA Figure 3D: Calibration curve of NDIPA

    Figure 3E: Calibration curve of NEIPA Figure 3F: Calibration curve of NDBA

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    5.5

    6.0

    6.5

    7.0NDMAy = 0.06648504x - 0.01570569R² = 0.9992424 R = 0.9996211

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: Default (1/C)Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 6.251375e-002SD RF: 4.681896e-003%RSD: 7.489387

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8

    2.0

    2.2

    2.4

    2.6

    2.8

    3.0 NDEAy = 0.02903289x - 0.0007750937R² = 0.9996266 R = 0.9998133

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: Default (1/C)Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 2.836373e-002SD RF: 1.021012e-003%RSD: 3.599710

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18 NMBA y = 0.1800639x + 0.01312147R² = 0.9961896 R = 0.9980930

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: 1/AZero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 1.914961e-001SD RF: 1.085115e-002%RSD: 5.666514

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    5.5

    6.0 NDIPAy = 0.06269403x - 0.0004824934R² = 0.9975311 R = 0.9987648

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: 1/A^2Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 6.248723e-002SD RF: 2.758088e-003%RSD: 4.413843

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    5.5

    6.0

    6.5

    7.0NIEPAy = 0.06671144x - 0.00007999886R² = 0.9988484 R = 0.9994240

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: 1/C^2Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 6.664237e-002SD RF: 1.989627e-003%RSD: 2.985528

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8

    2.0

    2.2

    2.4

    2.6

    2.8

    3.0

    3.2

    3.4

    3.6

    3.8

    4.0 NDBAy = 0.03943897x + 0.0009477200R² = 0.9985460 R = 0.9992727

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: Default (1/C)Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 4.025716e-002SD RF: 1.404429e-003%RSD: 3.488645

    Fig. 8C: Calibration curve of NMBA

    Fig. 8E: Calibration curve of NEIPA

    Fig. 8F: Calibration curve of NDBA

    Fig. 8D: Calibration curve of NDIPA

    Figure 3A: Calibration curve of NDMA Figure 3B: Calibration curve of NDEA

    Figure 3C: Calibration curve of NMBA Figure 3D: Calibration curve of NDIPA

    Figure 3E: Calibration curve of NEIPA Figure 3F: Calibration curve of NDBA

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    5.5

    6.0

    6.5

    7.0NDMAy = 0.06648504x - 0.01570569R² = 0.9992424 R = 0.9996211

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: Default (1/C)Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 6.251375e-002SD RF: 4.681896e-003%RSD: 7.489387

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8

    2.0

    2.2

    2.4

    2.6

    2.8

    3.0 NDEAy = 0.02903289x - 0.0007750937R² = 0.9996266 R = 0.9998133

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: Default (1/C)Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 2.836373e-002SD RF: 1.021012e-003%RSD: 3.599710

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18 NMBA y = 0.1800639x + 0.01312147R² = 0.9961896 R = 0.9980930

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: 1/AZero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 1.914961e-001SD RF: 1.085115e-002%RSD: 5.666514

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    5.5

    6.0 NDIPAy = 0.06269403x - 0.0004824934R² = 0.9975311 R = 0.9987648

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: 1/A^2Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 6.248723e-002SD RF: 2.758088e-003%RSD: 4.413843

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    5.5

    6.0

    6.5

    7.0NIEPAy = 0.06671144x - 0.00007999886R² = 0.9988484 R = 0.9994240

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: 1/C^2Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 6.664237e-002SD RF: 1.989627e-003%RSD: 2.985528

    Conc.Ratio (ng/mL)0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Area Ratio

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8

    2.0

    2.2

    2.4

    2.6

    2.8

    3.0

    3.2

    3.4

    3.6

    3.8

    4.0 NDBAy = 0.03943897x + 0.0009477200R² = 0.9985460 R = 0.9992727

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: Default (1/C)Zero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 4.025716e-002SD RF: 1.404429e-003%RSD: 3.488645

    [email protected] 8

  • Nitrosamines in Pharmaceuticals? No Problem!

    Calibration curves were performed by using internal standard method with regression coefficient of >0.99 over the linearity range (refer figure 3). Recovery study was performed by spiking 0.005ppm in the metformin sample and it was found to be well within the criteria.

    Case Study of Metformin (False Positive):

    One of the sample showed positive to the NDMA, however it was supposed to be negative. This peak showed response for both the transitions of the NDMA in the sample with the similar ion ratio (Refer figures 4A &4B)

    Figure 4A: NDMA peak (Reference ion ratio-25) Figure 4B: Interference peak in sample (Reference ion ratio-23)

    The gradient method was developed to separate this interference peak from the NDMA peak (refer figure 5).

    Figure 5: Comparision of NDMA mass chromatograms at different gradient programs

    For the further confirmation, NDMA standard and suspected metformin sample was analysed on LCMS-9030 quadrupole time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer system, Shimadzu. The LCMS-9030 enhances the most important features of Q-TOF instrumentation - mass accuracy, sensitivity, and speed - to address qualitative and quantitative challenges with genuine confidence and ease.

    Figure 6A: Mass chromatogram of NDMA Figure 6B: High resolution mass spectrum of NDMA peak

    1.09e4Q 75.20>43.10 (+)

    R1 22.92% (NC)

    RT=6.169

    RT (min)5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6.0 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7.0 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8 8.0

    0.0e0

    1.0e3

    2.0e3

    3.0e3

    4.0e3

    5.0e3

    6.0e3

    7.0e3

    8.0e3

    9.0e3

    1.0e4

    4.00 4.25 4.50 4.75 5.00 5.25 5.50 5.75 6.00 6.25 6.50 6.75 7.00 7.25 7.50 7.75 min

    0.00

    0.25

    0.50

    0.75

    1.00

    1.25

    1.50

    1.75

    2.00

    2.25

    2.50

    2.75

    3.00

    3.25

    3.50

    (x10,000)1:75.0545-75.0561(+)

    4244

    56

    70.0 72.5 75.0 77.5 80.0 m/z0

    10000

    20000

    30000

    40000

    50000Inten.

    75.055338

    NDMA

    Interference

    Initial gradient with poor separation

    Developed gradient with separation

    The gradient method was developed to separate this interference peak from the NDMA peak (refer figure 10).

    Calibration curves were performed by using internal standard method with regression coefficient of >0.99 over the linearity range (refer figure 3). Recovery study was performed by spiking 0.005ppm in the metformin sample and it was found to be well within the criteria.

    Case Study of Metformin (False Positive):

    One of the sample showed positive to the NDMA, however it was supposed to be negative. This peak showed response for both the transitions of the NDMA in the sample with the similar ion ratio (Refer figures 4A &4B)

    Figure 4A: NDMA peak (Reference ion ratio-25) Figure 4B: Interference peak in sample (Reference ion ratio-23)

    The gradient method was developed to separate this interference peak from the NDMA peak (refer figure 5).

    Figure 5: Comparision of NDMA mass chromatograms at different gradient programs

    For the further confirmation, NDMA standard and suspected metformin sample was analysed on LCMS-9030 quadrupole time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer system, Shimadzu. The LCMS-9030 enhances the most important features of Q-TOF instrumentation - mass accuracy, sensitivity, and speed - to address qualitative and quantitative challenges with genuine confidence and ease.

    Figure 6A: Mass chromatogram of NDMA Figure 6B: High resolution mass spectrum of NDMA peak

    1.09e4Q 75.20>43.10 (+)

    R1 22.92% (NC)

    RT=6.169

    RT (min)5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6.0 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7.0 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8 8.0

    0.0e0

    1.0e3

    2.0e3

    3.0e3

    4.0e3

    5.0e3

    6.0e3

    7.0e3

    8.0e3

    9.0e3

    1.0e4

    4.00 4.25 4.50 4.75 5.00 5.25 5.50 5.75 6.00 6.25 6.50 6.75 7.00 7.25 7.50 7.75 min

    0.00

    0.25

    0.50

    0.75

    1.00

    1.25

    1.50

    1.75

    2.00

    2.25

    2.50

    2.75

    3.00

    3.25

    3.50

    (x10,000)1:75.0545-75.0561(+)

    424456

    70.0 72.5 75.0 77.5 80.0 m/z0

    10000

    20000

    30000

    40000

    50000Inten.

    75.055338

    NDMA

    Interference

    Initial gradient with poor separation

    Developed gradient with separation

    Fig. 10: Comparision of NDMA mass chromatograms at different gradient programs

    For the further confirmation, NDMA standard and suspected metformin sample was analysed on LCMS-9030 quadrupole-time of flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer system, Shimadzu. The LCMS-9030 enhances the most important features of Q-TOF instrumentation - mass accuracy, sensitivity, and speed - to address qualitative and quantitative challenges with genuine confidence and ease.

    Calibration curves were performed by using internal standard method with regression coefficient of >0.99 over the linearity range (refer figure 3). Recovery study was performed by spiking 0.005ppm in the metformin sample and it was found to be well within the criteria.

    Case Study of Metformin (False Positive):

    One of the sample showed positive to the NDMA, however it was supposed to be negative. This peak showed response for both the transitions of the NDMA in the sample with the similar ion ratio (Refer figures 4A &4B)

    Figure 4A: NDMA peak (Reference ion ratio-25) Figure 4B: Interference peak in sample (Reference ion ratio-23)

    The gradient method was developed to separate this interference peak from the NDMA peak (refer figure 5).

    Figure 5: Comparision of NDMA mass chromatograms at different gradient programs

    For the further confirmation, NDMA standard and suspected metformin sample was analysed on LCMS-9030 quadrupole time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer system, Shimadzu. The LCMS-9030 enhances the most important features of Q-TOF instrumentation - mass accuracy, sensitivity, and speed - to address qualitative and quantitative challenges with genuine confidence and ease.

    Figure 6A: Mass chromatogram of NDMA Figure 6B: High resolution mass spectrum of NDMA peak

    1.09e4Q 75.20>43.10 (+)

    R1 22.92% (NC)

    RT=6.169

    RT (min)5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6.0 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7.0 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8 8.0

    0.0e0

    1.0e3

    2.0e3

    3.0e3

    4.0e3

    5.0e3

    6.0e3

    7.0e3

    8.0e3

    9.0e3

    1.0e4

    4.00 4.25 4.50 4.75 5.00 5.25 5.50 5.75 6.00 6.25 6.50 6.75 7.00 7.25 7.50 7.75 min

    0.00

    0.25

    0.50

    0.75

    1.00

    1.25

    1.50

    1.75

    2.00

    2.25

    2.50

    2.75

    3.00

    3.25

    3.50

    (x10,000)1:75.0545-75.0561(+)

    4244

    56

    70.0 72.5 75.0 77.5 80.0 m/z0

    10000

    20000

    30000

    40000

    50000Inten.

    75.055338

    NDMA

    Interference

    Initial gradient with poor separation

    Developed gradient with separation

    Case Study of Metformin (False Positive):One of the sample showed positive to the NDMA, however it was supposed to be negative. This peak showed response for both the transitions of the NDMA in the sample with the similar ion ratio (Refer Figures 9A & 9B)

    Fig. 9A: NDMA peak (Reference ion ratio-25)

    Fig. 9B: Interference peak in sample (Reference ion ratio-23)

    Calibration curves were performed by using internal standard method with regression coefficient of >0.99 over the linearity range (refer figure 3). Recovery study was performed by spiking 0.005ppm in the metformin sample and it was found to be well within the criteria.

    Case Study of Metformin (False Positive):

    One of the sample showed positive to the NDMA, however it was supposed to be negative. This peak showed response for both the transitions of the NDMA in the sample with the similar ion ratio (Refer figures 4A &4B)

    Figure 4A: NDMA peak (Reference ion ratio-25) Figure 4B: Interference peak in sample (Reference ion ratio-23)

    The gradient method was developed to separate this interference peak from the NDMA peak (refer figure 5).

    Figure 5: Comparision of NDMA mass chromatograms at different gradient programs

    For the further confirmation, NDMA standard and suspected metformin sample was analysed on LCMS-9030 quadrupole time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer system, Shimadzu. The LCMS-9030 enhances the most important features of Q-TOF instrumentation - mass accuracy, sensitivity, and speed - to address qualitative and quantitative challenges with genuine confidence and ease.

    Figure 6A: Mass chromatogram of NDMA Figure 6B: High resolution mass spectrum of NDMA peak

    1.09e4Q 75.20>43.10 (+)

    R1 22.92% (NC)

    RT=6.169

    RT (min)5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6.0 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7.0 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8 8.0

    0.0e0

    1.0e3

    2.0e3

    3.0e3

    4.0e3

    5.0e3

    6.0e3

    7.0e3

    8.0e3

    9.0e3

    1.0e4

    4.00 4.25 4.50 4.75 5.00 5.25 5.50 5.75 6.00 6.25 6.50 6.75 7.00 7.25 7.50 7.75 min

    0.00

    0.25

    0.50

    0.75

    1.00

    1.25

    1.50

    1.75

    2.00

    2.25

    2.50

    2.75

    3.00

    3.25

    3.50

    (x10,000)1:75.0545-75.0561(+)

    4244

    56

    70.0 72.5 75.0 77.5 80.0 m/z0

    10000

    20000

    30000

    40000

    50000Inten.

    75.055338

    NDMA

    Interference

    Initial gradient with poor separation

    Developed gradient with separation

    Fig. 11A: Mass chromatogram of NDMA

    Fig. 11B: High resolution mass spectrum of NDMA peak

    Calibration curves were performed by using internal standard method with regression coefficient of >0.99 over the linearity range (refer figure 3). Recovery study was performed by spiking 0.005ppm in the metformin sample and it was found to be well within the criteria.

    Case Study of Metformin (False Positive):

    One of the sample showed positive to the NDMA, however it was supposed to be negative. This peak showed response for both the transitions of the NDMA in the sample with the similar ion ratio (Refer figures 4A &4B)

    Figure 4A: NDMA peak (Reference ion ratio-25) Figure 4B: Interference peak in sample (Reference ion ratio-23)

    The gradient method was developed to separate this interference peak from the NDMA peak (refer figure 5).

    Figure 5: Comparision of NDMA mass chromatograms at different gradient programs

    For the further confirmation, NDMA standard and suspected metformin sample was analysed on LCMS-9030 quadrupole time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer system, Shimadzu. The LCMS-9030 enhances the most important features of Q-TOF instrumentation - mass accuracy, sensitivity, and speed - to address qualitative and quantitative challenges with genuine confidence and ease.

    Figure 6A: Mass chromatogram of NDMA Figure 6B: High resolution mass spectrum of NDMA peak

    1.09e4Q 75.20>43.10 (+)

    R1 22.92% (NC)

    RT=6.169

    RT (min)5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6.0 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7.0 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8 8.0

    0.0e0

    1.0e3

    2.0e3

    3.0e3

    4.0e3

    5.0e3

    6.0e3

    7.0e3

    8.0e3

    9.0e3

    1.0e4

    4.00 4.25 4.50 4.75 5.00 5.25 5.50 5.75 6.00 6.25 6.50 6.75 7.00 7.25 7.50 7.75 min

    0.00

    0.25

    0.50

    0.75

    1.00

    1.25

    1.50

    1.75

    2.00

    2.25

    2.50

    2.75

    3.00

    3.25

    3.50

    (x10,000)1:75.0545-75.0561(+)

    4244

    56

    70.0 72.5 75.0 77.5 80.0 m/z0

    10000

    20000

    30000

    40000

    50000Inten.

    75.055338

    NDMA

    Interference

    Initial gradient with poor separation

    Developed gradient with separation

    NDMA has a monoisotopic mass of 74.048012. Therefore, total mass of protonated NDMA is [M+H]+ is 74.048012+1.007276=75.055288. The observed mass of NDMA on LCMS-9030 system is 75.055338 (refer Figure 11B) with the mass accuracy of 0.6 ppm.

    In this, metformin sample the mass of interference peak is 75.063462 (refer Figure 12B) with the mass accuracy of 109 ppm. Secondly, this interference peak is showing no response at the mass of NDMA, thus, it confirmed that this sample is negative to the NDMA.

    This case study helps us to understand the scenario wherein false positive results on the triple quadrupole system can be further investigated and confirmed on the high-resolution mass spectrometer such as Q-TOF system. Therefore, high resolution mass spectrometer become inevitable tool to identify the false positive/ suspected samples.

    NDMA has a monoisotopic mass of 74.048012. Therefore, total mass of protonated NDMA is [M+H]+ is 74.048012+1.007276= 75.055288. The observed mass of NDMA on LCMS-9030 system is 75.055338 (refer figure 6B) with the mass accuracy of 0.6ppm.

    Figure 7A: Overlay Extracted mass spectra of interference peak & NDMA Figure 7B: Mass spectrum of interference peak

    In this, metformin sample the mass of interference peak is 75.063462 (refer figure 7B) with the mass accuracy of 109ppm.Secondaly, this interference peak is showing no response at the mass of NDMA, thus, it confirmed that this sample is negative to the NDMA.

    This case study helps us to understand the scenario wherein false positive results on the triple quadrupole system can be further investigated and confirmed on the high-resolution mass spectrometer such as Q-ToF system. Therefore, high resolution mass spectrometer become inevitable tool to identify the false positive/ suspected samples.

    For further information please contact us on [email protected] .

    4.00 4.25 4.50 4.75 5.00 5.25 5.50 5.75 6.00 6.25 6.50 6.75 7.00 7.25 7.50 7.75 min

    0.0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1.0(x100,000)

    1:75.0626-75.0642(+)1:75.0545-75.0561(+)

    74.50 74.75 75.00 75.25 75.50 75.75 76.00 m/z0

    25000

    50000

    75000

    100000

    125000Inten.

    75.063462

    NDMA has a monoisotopic mass of 74.048012. Therefore, total mass of protonated NDMA is [M+H]+ is 74.048012+1.007276= 75.055288. The observed mass of NDMA on LCMS-9030 system is 75.055338 (refer figure 6B) with the mass accuracy of 0.6ppm.

    Figure 7A: Overlay Extracted mass spectra of interference peak & NDMA Figure 7B: Mass spectrum of interference peak

    In this, metformin sample the mass of interference peak is 75.063462 (refer figure 7B) with the mass accuracy of 109ppm.Secondaly, this interference peak is showing no response at the mass of NDMA, thus, it confirmed that this sample is negative to the NDMA.

    This case study helps us to understand the scenario wherein false positive results on the triple quadrupole system can be further investigated and confirmed on the high-resolution mass spectrometer such as Q-ToF system. Therefore, high resolution mass spectrometer become inevitable tool to identify the false positive/ suspected samples.

    For further information please contact us on [email protected] .

    4.00 4.25 4.50 4.75 5.00 5.25 5.50 5.75 6.00 6.25 6.50 6.75 7.00 7.25 7.50 7.75 min

    0.0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1.0(x100,000)

    1:75.0626-75.0642(+)1:75.0545-75.0561(+)

    74.50 74.75 75.00 75.25 75.50 75.75 76.00 m/z0

    25000

    50000

    75000

    100000

    125000Inten.

    75.063462

    Fig. 12A: Overlay Extracted mass spectra of interference peak & NDMA

    Fig. 12B: Mass spectrum of interference peak

    [email protected]

  • Nitrosamines in Pharmaceuticals? No Problem!

    Model N-Series UHPLC System

    HPLC columnShim pack GISS C18 (250 mm x 4.6 mm, 5 u) (P/N :227-30061-07)

    Column temp. 40 °CFlow rate 0.7 mL/minMobile phase A 0.1 % formic acid in waterMobile phase B 0.1 % formic acid in methanolGradient program Time (min) A % B %

    0.0 95 55.0 95 515.0 10 9018.0 10 9018.1 95 525.0 95 5

    Autosampler temp. 5 °C

    Model LCMS-9030 Q-TOF Mass SpectrometerInterface/polarity APCI/PositiveNebulizing gas flow 3.00 L/minInterface temp. 350 ˚CDL temp. 200 ˚CHeating block temp. 200 ˚CDrying gas flow 5.00 L/minMS mode ScanScan range 70-90 m/z

    Data processingNDMA: 75.0553

    NDMA D6: 81.0927

    Divert valve settingsTime (min)

    Divert valve position

    0 Towards MS

    10 Towards waste

    Table 10: Analytical Conditions for LC-HRMS

    LC-HRMS method for the determination of NDMA in Ranitidine drug substance as per reference from USFDA method

    Background

    Ranitidine HCl is a prescription and over the counter medication used to treat acid reflux. The drug is a histamine-2 receptor antagonist (acid inhibitor or H2 blocker). Some of the common H2 receptor blockers include: Ranitidine (Zantac), Nizatidine (Acid), Famotidine (Pepcid, Pepcid AC) and Cimetidine (Tagamet, Tagamet HB). As GC based methods had been observed to elevate NDMA levels in tested materials, an alternative method which prevents the degradation of ranitidine and the subsequent formation of NDMA was therefore needed. A liquid chromatography with high resolution mass spectrometer (LC-HRMS) was developed to measure the levels of NDMA in ranitidine drug substance.

    PrincipleReverse phase analysis is used for the separation of N-Nitroso- dimethylamine (NDMA) impurity from Ranitidine. HRMS method developed for the quantitation of NDMA using internal standard calibration method.

    ConclusionHighly sensitive LC-HRMS method was developed for analysis of NDMA in Ranitidine drug substance. High mass accuracy of LCMS-9030 enables reliable quantitation of NDMA from Ranitidine drug substance.

    InstrumentN-Series UHPLC with LCMS-9030

    Highlighted features

    • ReproducibleResultsThe LCMS-9030 Q-TOF delivers

    outstanding mass accuracy over a wide mass range, enabling users to consistently produce accurate identification results. In addition, the LCMS-9030 does not require frequent calibration, making it easy to achieve high mass accuracy over long periods.

    • HighSensitivityDetectionHigh efficiency ion guides, quadrupole and collision cell enable high sensitivity for the detection of trace level compounds. And, due to its robust platform, the LCMS-9030 achieves reproducible quantitative analysis over longer periods of time.

    • UltrafastPerformanceThe LCMS-9030 incorporates the patented ultrafast technologies used in Shimadzu LC-MS/MS platforms to deliver outstanding speed. Innovative TOF architecture enables precise, ultra-fast pulsing of ions into the flight tube and ideal reflection back to the detector. The result is high-speed data acquisition compatible with the high-throughput laboratory.

    Materials and methodMobile phase preparation• Mobile phase A (0.1% formic acid

    in water): mix formic acid and water at a volume ratio of 1:1000

    LCMS-9030

    [email protected] 10

  • Results and Discussion

    Figure 11: Comparison between UV Chromatogram (at 254nm) of Ranitidine and extracted ion chromatogram (EIC) in HRMS of NDMA

    NDMA peak is well separated from ranitidine drug. Ranitidine API peak is diverted to the waste by using divert valve to avoid the contamination of mass spectrometer.

    Figure 12A: Blank Figure 12B: NDMA (1.0 ng/mL standard)

    Datafile Name:SAMPLE_01_010.lcdSample Name:SAMPLE_01Sample ID:1301_SARAKA

    0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 min

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    mAU (x1,000)Ch1-254nm,4nm (2.00)

    12.0

    430.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 min

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    (x10,000)1:75.0541-75.0565(+)

    8.95

    0

    1.89e2Q 75.0553+/-15.0ppm (+)

    RT (min)6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5

    0.0e0

    5.0e1

    1.0e2

    1.5e2

    2.0e2

    2.5e2

    3.0e2

    3.5e2

    4.0e2

    4.5e2

    3.58e2 Q 75.0553+/-15.0ppm (+)

    RT=8.968

    RT (min) 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 0.0e0

    1.0e2

    2.0e2

    3.0e2

    4.0e2

    5.0e2

    6.0e2

    7.0e2

    Results and Discussion

    Figure 11: Comparison between UV Chromatogram (at 254nm) of Ranitidine and extracted ion chromatogram (EIC) in HRMS of NDMA

    NDMA peak is well separated from ranitidine drug. Ranitidine API peak is diverted to the waste by using divert valve to avoid the contamination of mass spectrometer.

    Figure 12A: Blank Figure 12B: NDMA (1.0 ng/mL standard)

    Datafile Name:SAMPLE_01_010.lcdSample Name:SAMPLE_01Sample ID:1301_SARAKA

    0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 min

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    mAU (x1,000)Ch1-254nm,4nm (2.00)

    12.0

    43

    0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 min

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    (x10,000)1:75.0541-75.0565(+)

    8.95

    0

    1.89e2Q 75.0553+/-15.0ppm (+)

    RT (min)6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5

    0.0e0

    5.0e1

    1.0e2

    1.5e2

    2.0e2

    2.5e2

    3.0e2

    3.5e2

    4.0e2

    4.5e2

    3.58e2 Q 75.0553+/-15.0ppm (+)

    RT=8.968

    RT (min) 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 0.0e0

    1.0e2

    2.0e2

    3.0e2

    4.0e2

    5.0e2

    6.0e2

    7.0e2

    NDMA peak is well separated from ranitidine drug. Ranitidine API peak is diverted to the waste by using divert valve to avoid the contamination of mass spectrometer.

    Figure 12C: NDMA-D6 Figure 12D: Calibration curve (1 – 100 ng/mL)

    Blank chromatogram does not show any interference at the retention time of NDMA as shown in figure 12A and 12B. Calibration curve was performed by using internal standard method with coefficient of correlation of 0.999 over a range of 1.0 to 100.0 ng/mL (refer figure 12D). Recovery study was performed by spiking LOQ level in the ranitidine sample and it was found to be well within the criteria.

    In continuation to above work, Shimadzu lab, mumbai has developed the in-house method to determine NDMA in Ranitidine by using LCMS-8045 system, wherein LOQ achieve is up to 0.005ppm/LOD level of 0.002ppm in ranitidine.

    LC-MS/MS method for the determination of NDMA, NDEA, NDIPA, NMBA, NEIPA and NDBA in Valsartan Drug Substance as per reference from USFDA method

    Background about nitrosamines in Valsartan:

    In July 2018, the American Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that the carcinogenic impurities: Nitrosamines (N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) and N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA)) had been detected in Valsartan bulk drug substances manufactured by Chinese manufacturers. Subsequently, a worldwide recall was issued of pharmaceutical products that use Valsartan bulk drug substances. Valsartan is used in the treatment of high blood pressure and congestive heart failure.

    This LC-MS/MS method is used for the quantitation of six nitrosamines in Valsartan drug substance. The impurities are : N-nitroso-di-methylamine (NDMA), N-nitroso-di-ethyl amine (NDEA), N-nitroso-N-methyl-4-aminobutyric acid (NMBA), N-nitroso-ethyl iso-propylamine (NEIPA), N-nitroso-di-iso-propylamine (NDIPA), and N-nitroso-di-butylamine (NDBA

    Principle

    Reverse phase analysis is used for the separation of NDMA, NDEA, NMBA, NDIPA, NEIPA and NDBA impurities from valsartan. MRM method is developed for the all six nitrosamines. Two different Internal standards method is used for the quantification of NDMA in sample.

    Conclusions

    1.88e3ISTD 81.0927+/-15.0ppm (+)RT=8.773

    RT (min)7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5

    0.0e0

    2.0e2

    4.0e2

    6.0e2

    8.0e2

    1.0e3

    1.2e3

    1.4e3

    1.6e3

    1.8e3

    Conc.Ratio (ppb)0 20 40 60 80 100

    Area Ratio

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    NDMAy = 0.1464784x + 0.01384017R² = 0.9994579 R = 0.9997289

    Curve Fit: Default (Linear)Weighting: 1/CZero: Default (Not Forced)

    Mean RF: 1.538532e-001SD RF: 1.788628e-002%RSD: 11.625548

    Results and Discussion• Mobile phase B (0.1% formic acid in

    methanol): mix formic acid and methanol at a volume ratio of 1:1000

    Diluent and blank: Water NDMA intermediate stock standard preparation (100 ng/mL) • Prepare a 100 ng/mL intermediate

    stock standard solution in water using commercially available NDMA reference stock standard solution.

    Working standard solution preparation (1.0 ng/mL) • Transfer a 1.0 mL aliquot volume of the

    intermediate stock standard into a 100 mL volumetric flask and dilute to volume with water. Prepare fresh daily.

    Ranitidine drug sample preparation • Accurately weigh 120 mg of drug substance

    into a 15 mL glass centrifuge tube. Add 4.0 mL of water and mix the solution using a vortex mixer until dissolved.

    • Filter it using a 0.22 μm PVDF syringe filter in HPLC vial.

    Blank chromatogram does not show any interference at the retention time of NDMA as shown in Figures 14A and 14B. Calibration curve was performed by using internal standard method with coefficient of correlation of 0.999 over a range of 1.0 to 100.0 ng/mL (Figure 14D). Recovery study was performed by spiking LOQ level in the Ranitidine sample and it was found to be well within the criteria.

    Outstanding mass accuracy over a wide mass range, high efficiency ion guides, quadrupole, and collision cell of LCMS-9030 Q-TOF enabled high sensitivity quantitation with good reproducibility over longer periods of time without need of frequent calibration.

    In continuation to above work, Shimadzu Labs, Mumbai has developed the in-house method to determine NDMA in Ranitidine by using LCMS-8045 system, wherein LOQ achieve is up to 0.005 ppm/LOD level of 0.002 ppm in ranitidine.

    Fig. 13: Comparison between UV Chromatogram (at 254nm) of Ranitidine and extracted ion chromatogram (EIC) in HRMS of NDMA

    Fig. 14A: Blank

    Fig. 14C: NDMA-D6 Fig. 14D: Calibration curve (1-100 ng/mL)

    Fig. 14B: NDMA (1.0 ng/mL standard)

    Nitrosamines in Pharmaceuticals? No Problem!

    [email protected]

  • The LCMS-8045 accomplishes the highest sensitivity in its class, thanks to the superior design with a heated ESI probe. With the world's fastest scan speed (30,000 u/sec) and polarity switching time (5 ms), high speed data acquisition is a reality now for increased throughput and shortened method development time.

    LCMS-8045Liquid Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer

    Best in Class Sensitivity

    [email protected] 1 09 281-20

    40Yearsof Service to Customers

    and continuing…

    Accomplishes both high sensitivity and ultra-high-speed detection

    Superior robustness maintaining sensitivity over the long term

    High Performance for a variety of analyses - veterinary drugs,

    residual pesticides, water quality analysis, bioanalysis etc.

    Upgradable to LCMS-8060, the world's highest sensitivity triple quad MS.


Recommended