+ All Categories
Home > Documents > NM USER FORUM 2014 Nicky Cooper Head Network Operations Management The Network Management response...

NM USER FORUM 2014 Nicky Cooper Head Network Operations Management The Network Management response...

Date post: 11-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: armani-hinkley
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
18
NM USER FORUM 2014 Nicky Cooper Head Network Operations Management The Network Management response to airlines and airports Ralph Riedle Senior ATM Consultant, Performance & Operations 29/012014
Transcript

NM USER FORUM 2014

Nicky CooperHead Network Operations Management

The Network Management response to airlines and airports

Ralph RiedleSenior ATM Consultant,Performance & Operations 29/012014

“Who are the managers in your Network Operations Management team and what are their roles?”

“Please give your personal overview of the highlights of 2013?”

“What have been the strategic directions that guided your operations?”

2

Flexible Use of AirspaceFree Route &

de-fragmented Airspace

End-to-end Information Management

EfficientCNS

Infrastructures

Low impact measures with Cooperative

Traffic Management

A-CDM

Environment friendly Airport

Operations

Facilitated access to Airports

PBN in TMA

Free Routes

Flight Level 315

Structured Airsp

ace

What Airspace Users will get from the Network Concept of Operations by 2020…… to achieve predictability, punctuality, safety and service continuity

Flexible Use of AirspaceFree Route &

de-fragmented Airspace

Low impact measures with Cooperative

Traffic Management

A-CDM

Environment friendly Airport

Operations

Facilitated access to Airports

PBN in TMA

4

Operations Planning

Operations Planning

Support to

Airports

Support to

Airports

Support to Safety

Support to Safety

Coordination& Crisis

Coordination& Crisis

NM Operations

Centre

NM Operations

Centre

NOM

Team

NOM

Team

Flexible Use of AirspaceFree Route &

de-fragmented Airspace

Low impact measures with Cooperative

Traffic Management

A-CDM

Environment friendly Airport

Operations

Facilitated access to Airports

PBN in TMA

5

6

“Why do we need to start thinking differently about safety now? What has changed?”

7

Three ages of industrial safety

IT Revolution

2000195019001850

1931Industrial accident

prevention

1893Railroad Safety Appliance Act

1769Industrial

Revolution

1961Fault tree analysis

Age of technology

1979Three Mile

Island

Age of human factors

1986Challenger

Чернобыль

Age of safety management

8

From Negative to Positive Safety

Negative outcomes are caused by failures and malfunctions.

All outcomes (positiveand negative) are due to performance variability.

- +Safety = Reducednumber of adverseevents.

Safety = Ability tosucceed undervarying conditions.

Safety = Ability torespond whensomething fails.

Improve ability torespond to adverseevents.

Eliminate failuresand malfunctions as far as possible.

Improve resilience.

9

“What additional support do the airlines need compared to what is currently done with respect to airspace design and airspace utilisation?

“How do airlines see the cooperation between NM and CFSPs in supporting the airlines efforts to plan better routes?”

RTE-DES

3.53%3.54%3.45%3.22%3.04%2.96%2.80%2.64%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

RTE-FPL

4.91%5.03%4.90%4.91%4.73%4.64%4.57%4.48%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Route Efficiency KPI per AIRAC cycle

20

12

20

10

20

10

20

11

20

13

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

4.5%

5.0%

5.5%

1001

1002

1003

1004

1005

1006

1007

1008

1009

1010

1011

1012

1013

1101

1102

1103

1104

1105

1106

1107

1108

1109

1110

1111

1112

1113

1201

1202

1203

1204

1205

1206

1207

1208

1209

1210

1211

1212

1213

1301

1302

1303

1304

1305

1306

1307

1308

1309

1310

1311

1312

1313

AIRAC

Ro

ute

Ext

ensi

on

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

RTE-DES

RTE-FPL

Flight Efficiency performance trends

Potential Yearly NM Savings and Mileage FlownAirspace Design

3000000

4000000

4800000

6900000

1700000

3380000

0

1000000

2000000

3000000

4000000

5000000

6000000

7000000

8000000

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Year

Sav

ing

s

3700000000

3800000000

3900000000

4000000000

4100000000

4200000000

Mil

eag

e fl

ow

n

Savings(NM)

Mileageflown(NM)

Yearly NM Savings and Mileage FlownFlight Planning

3000000

4600000

-5700000

6200000

1400000

-2111000

-8000000

-6000000

-4000000

-2000000

0

2000000

4000000

6000000

8000000

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Year

Sav

ing

s3300000000

3400000000

3500000000

3600000000

3700000000

3800000000

3900000000

4000000000

4100000000

4200000000

4300000000

Mil

eag

e fl

ow

n

Savings(NM)

Mileageflown(NM)

Savings potentially achievable…

12

“What concrete actions did you undertake to progress airport/network integration in 2013?”

“What are the next steps?”

13

• Enhance APT/NM info exchanges• A-CDM – Harmonisation• Advanced Tower Concept• Report real reasons for delay• Better prediction (FPL/APT slot)

2013 2014+

• Info. exchange process & automation• Dynamic airport status map on NOP portal• Centralised Service (FPL/APT slot)

14

“How did we all achieve 0.53mn as the avg. en route delay per flight in 2013?”

“What are your plans for flight efficiency from an operational perspective?"

15

En route delays

• Monitoring via Playbook

• Mitigations in CDM mode • Planning all events > simulation > coordinated implementation

Flight Efficiency

• Pilot project since May 2013 • Now mature for deployment • IPPU2 planned on 1-4-2014• Using the Opportunity Tool •Targeted ATFM measures

ANSP’scontribution

16

“What is NM doing to strengthen coordination in times of crisis and major network disruption?”

NM & EACCCNM &

EACCC

Info.Sharing

Info.Sharing

ExercisesExercises

SRAApproach

SRAApproach

PilotReports

PilotReports

EVITAEVITA

AOCCCAOCCC

Coordination in times of crisis & network disruption

18


Recommended