Nollet, Abbé (), Lettres sur l’ Électricité, dans lesquelles on
Abattouy, M., Renn, J., Weinig P.
(2001), “Transmission
as Transformation:
The Translation Movements in the Medieval East and West in a Compara
tive Perspective”, Science in Context, 14: 1–12.
Agassi, J. (1978), “The ideological import of Newton”, Vistas in Astronomy, 22:
419430.
Agostino, S. d’ (1988), “Boscovich’s
reception of Newton’s legacy”,
in M.
Bossi, P. Tucci (eds.), Bicentennial commemoration of R.G. Boscovich, Edizioni
Unicopli, Milano: 2845.
Agostino, S. d’ (1989), “From Boskovic’s notes on the work of Benedict Stav: A
criticism of one of Newton’s alleged proofs of absolute motion”, Memorie
della Società Astronomica Italiana, 60: 759768.
Agostino, S. d’ (1993), “Boscovich’s Physical Theory of Space and Matter” in
Boscovich, Vita e attività: 4148.
Ahnert, T. (2004), “Newtonianism in early Enlightenment Germany, c. 1720 to
1750: metaphysics and the critique
of dogmatic philosophy”, Studies
in
History and Philosophy of Science, 35: 471491.
Albertone, M. (2008), “The idea of Europe in the eighteenth century in history
and historiography”, History of European Ideas, 34: 349–352.
Alexander, A.R. (2001), “Exploration Mathematics: The Rhetoric of Discovery
and the Rise of Infinitesimal Methods”, Configurations, 9: 136.
Alexander, P.
(1994), “Solidity and Elasticity in
the Seventeenth Century” in
G.A.J. Rogers, Locke’s Philosophy. Content and Context, Oxford, Clarendon
Press: 143164.
Allen, L.D. (1998), Physics, frivolity and “Madame PomponNewton”: The histori
cal reception of the Marquise du Chatelet from 1750 to 1996, Doctoral Disserta
tion, University of Cincinnati [adviser: Jeffrey A. Loveland].
Anstey, P.R. (2002) “Robert Boyle
and the heuristic value
of mechanism”,
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 33: 161–174.
Arthur, R.T.W. (1995), “Newton’s Fluxions and Equably Flowing Time”, Stud
ies in History and Philosophy of Science, 26: 323351.
E I G H T E E N T H - C E N T U R Y S C I E N C E S E C O N D A R Y
B I B L I O G R A P H Y 2
Aston, N. (2004), “From personality to party: the creation and transmission of
Hutchinsonianism, c. 1725–1750”, Studies
in History and Philosophy of Sci
ence, 35: 625644.
Attfield, R. (1977), “Clarke, Collins, and Compounds”, Journal of the History of
Philosophy, 15: 4554.
Ayers, M.R. (1994), “The foundations
of knowledge and the logic of
sub
stance: The structure of
Locke’s General Philosophy” in G.A.J.
Rogers,
Locke’s Philosophy. Content and Context, Oxford, Clarendon Press: 4973.
Baillon, J.F. (2004), “Early eighteenth century Newtonianism: the Huguenot
contribution”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 35: 533548.
Basalla, G.
(1967), “The Spread of Western Science: A
threestage model de
scribes the introduction of modern
science into any nonEuropean na
tion”, Science, 156: 611622.
Barad, K. (1999), “Agential Realism: Feminist Interventions in Understanding
Scientific Practices”, in Biagioli, 1999: 111.
Barber, W.H. (1979a), “Voltaire and Samuel Clarke”, Studies on Voltaire and the
Eighteenth Century, 179: 4761.
Barber, W.H. (1979b), “ Voltaire et Newton”, Studies on Voltaire and the Eight
eenth Century, 179: 193202.
Barker, P. (1996), “Understanding Change and Continuity” in F.J. Ragep and
S.P. Ragep (eds.), Tradition,
transmission, transformation. Proceedings of
two
Conferences on PreModern Science Held
at the University
of Oklahoma, E.J.
Brill, LeidenNew YorkKöln: 527550.
Barker, P. (2006), “New Work in Early Modern Science”, Centaurus, 48: 12
Beaver, D. deB. (1987), “Textbooks of Natural Philosophy: The Beautification
of Technology”, in Berggren and Goldsein, 1987: 203213.
BenZaken, A. (2004), “The heavens of the sky and the heavens of the heart:
the Ottoman cultural context for
the introduction of postCopernican as
tronomy”, British Journal for the History of Science, 37: 128.
Berggren, J.L. and Goldsein, B.R. (1987), From Ancient Omens to Statistical Me
chanics, Copenhagen: University Library.
Porter and Teich, 1992: 1154.
Biagioli, M. (1998), “The Scientific Revolution is Undead”, Configurations, 6.2:
141148.
Biagioli, M. (1999a), “Introduction”, in Biagioli, 1999: XIXVIII.
E I G H T E E N T H - C E N T U R Y S C I E N C E S E C O N D A R Y
B I B L I O G R A P H Y 3
Biagioli, M. (ed.)
(1999), The Science
Studies Reader, New York
and London:
Routledge. [Index.]
Bjelic, D. and Lynch, M. (1994), “Goethe’s
‘Protestant Reformation’ as a Tex
tual Demonstration: Comment on
Jackson”, Social Studies of Science,
24:
703724.
and Teich, 1981: 118126.
Bolton, M.B. (1994), “The real Molyneux question and the basis of Locke’s an
swer” in G.A.J. Rogers, Locke’s
Philosophy. Content and
Context, Oxford,
Clarendon Press: 7599.
Boner, P.J. (2006), “Kepler’s
living cosmology: Bridging
the celestial and the
terrestrial realms”, Centaurus, 48: 3239.
Bono, J. (1995), The Word of God and the Languages of Man. Interpreting Nature in
Early Modern Science and Medicine, vol: Ficino
to Descartes, Madison, Wis
consin: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Bono, J.J. (1999), “From Paracelsus to Newton: The Word of God, the Book of
Nature, and the Eclipse of the
‘Emblematic World View’” in Force
and
Popkin, 1999: 4576.
Bos, H.J.M. (1980), “Mathematics and
rational mechanics”,
in Rousseau and
Porter, 1980: 327355.
Bos, H.J.M. (1989), “Tractional motion 16921767. The journey of a mathemati
cal theme from Holland to Italy” in Maffioli & Palm, 1989: 207229.
R.J. Boscovich. Vita e attività scientifica. His life and scientific work. Atti del Con
vegno, Roma, 2327 maggio 1988.
Instituto della Enciclopedia
Italiana,
Roma 1993. [Bibliografia generale.] [Indice dei nomi.]
Boswell, T. (1990), “The Brothers James and John Bernoulli on the parallelism
between logic and algebra”, History and Philosophy of Logic, 11: 173184.
Bourdieu, P., (1999/19751), “The Specificity of the Scientific Field and the So
cial Conditions of
the Progress of Reason”,
in Biagioli, 1999: 3150. First
published in Social Science Information, 14: 1947.
Boutin, P. (1996),
JeanThéophile Desaguliers. Un Huguenot, philosophe
et juriste
en politique, Paris: Honoré Champion.
Bricker, P. and Hughes, R.I.G. (eds.) (1990), Philosophical Perspectives on New
tonian Science, Cambridge, MALondon: The MIT Press.
1 Reprinted with revisions
E I G H T E E N T H - C E N T U R Y S C I E N C E S E C O N D A R Y
B I B L I O G R A P H Y 4
Brigaglia, A. (1993), “A Comparison
of the Relations
between Mathematics
and Physics in Boscovich and d’Alembert” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: 195
213.
ies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century, 216: 4850.
Brittan, G.G. (1993), “The Role of the Law of Continuity in Boscovich’s Theory
of Matter” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: 215227.
Brockliss, L.W.B. (1992), “The Scientific Revolution
in France”, in Porter and
Teich, 1992: 5589.
Brooke, J.H.
(2000), “Introduction: The Study of Chemical Textbooks”
in A.
Lundgren and B. BensaudeVincent (eds.), Communicating Chemistry. Text
books and Their Audiences, 17891939, Science History Publications, Canton
MA: 118.
BursillHall, P. (1993), “Introduction” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: VIIXXIII.
Burtt, E.A. (1932), The metaphysical foundations of modern physical science. A his
torical and critical essay, second
edition (revised), London: Kegan
Paul.
Originally published in 1924.
Calinger, R.S. (1968),
“The NewtonianWolffian confrontation in
the St. Pe
tersburg Academy of Sciences
(17251746)”, Journal of World History,
11:
41735.
Calinger, R.S. (1969), “The
NewtonianWolffian controversy: 17401759”,
Journal of the History of Ideas, 30: 319330.
Calinger, R.S. (1972), “Response to the Critical Commentary of L. Pearce Wil
liams”, in The Influence of Early Enlightenment Thought upon German Classi
cal Science and Letters. Problems for Future Discussion, Science History Publi
cation, New York: 4546.
Calinger, R.S.
(1972), “The German Classical Weltanschauung
in the Physical
Sciences”, in The Influence of
Early Enlightenment Thought upon
German
Classical Science and Letters. Problems for Future Discussion, Science History
Publication, New York: 117.
Calinger, R.S. (1976), “Euler’s ‘Letters to a Princess of Germany’ as an Expres
sion of his Mature Scientific Outlook”, Archive for History of Exact Sciences,
15: 211233.
Calinger, R.S. (1996),
“Leonhard Euler: The
first St. Petersburg years (1727
1741)”, Historia Mathematica, 23: 121166.
Carriero, J. (1990), “Newton on Space and Time: Comments on J.E. McGuire”,
in Bricker and Hughes, 1990: 109133.
E I G H T E E N T H - C E N T U R Y S C I E N C E S E C O N D A R Y
B I B L I O G R A P H Y 5
Carter, P. (1999), “Gaps in Knowledge: The Geography of Human Reason”, in
Livingstone and Withers, 1999: 295318.
Carver, J.S.
(1980), “A Reconsideration of EighteenthCentury Russia’s Con
tributions to European Science”, CanadianAmerican Slavic Studies, 14: 389
405.
Casanovas, J. (1993), “Boscovich’s Early Astronomical Studies at the Collegio
Romano” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: 237244.
Casini, P.
(1979), “Briarée en miniature: Voltaire et Newton”, Studies on Vol
taire and the Eighteenth Century, 179: 6377.
Casini, P. (1988), “Newton’s Principia and the Philosophers of the Enlighten
ment”, in KingHele and Hall, 1988: 3552.
Casini, P. (1993), “Boscovich and the Hypothesis Terrae Motae” in Boscovich, Vita
e attività: 229235.
Cassirer, E.
(1943), “Newton and Leibniz”, The Philosophical Review, 52: 366
391.
Chadwick, O. (1981), “The Italian Enlightenment”, in Porter and Teich, 1981:
90105.
Champion, J.A.I. (1999), “‘Acceptable
to inquisitive men’: Some
Simonian
Contexts for Newton’s Biblical Criticism, 16801692” in Force and Popkin,
1999: 7796.
570–582.
Clark, W. (1992), “The Scientific Revolution in the German Nations”, in Porter
and Teich, 1992: 5589.
Clark, W. (1997), “German Physics textbooks in the Goethezeit”, History of Sci
ence, 35: 219239 and 295363.
Clark, W. (1997a), “The Death
of Metaphysics in Enlightened
Prussia”, in
Clark et al., 1997: 423473.
Clark, W., Golinski,
J., Schaffer, S.
(1997), The Sciences
in Enlightened Europe,
Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Clark, W., Golinski, J., Schaffer, S. (1997a), “Introduction”, in Clark et al., 1997:
331.
Clark, W., Golinski,
J., Schaffer, S.
(1997b), “Bodies and Technologies” [Sub
ject introduction], in Clark et al., 1997: 4147.
Clark, W., Golinski,
J., Schaffer, S. (1997c), “Humans
and Natures” [Subject
introduction], in Clark et al., 1997: 167173.
E I G H T E E N T H - C E N T U R Y S C I E N C E S E C O N D A R Y
B I B L I O G R A P H Y 6
Clark, W., Golinski, J., Schaffer, S. (1997d), “Provinces and Peripheries” [Sub
ject introduction], in Clark et al., 1997: 305311.
Cohen C. (1997), “Leibniz’s Protogaea: Patronage, Mining, and Evidence for a
History of the Earth” in S. Marchand and E. Lunbeck (eds.), Proof and Per
suasion; Essays on Authority, Objectivity and Evidence, Brepols: 124143.
Cohen, C. and Wakefield, A., “Leibniz’s Protogaea: Practices, Concepts and
Contexts”, a workshop.
Cohen, H.F.
(1989), “Galileo’s Ups and Downs in
the Historiography of the
Scientific Revolution”, in Maffioli & Palm, 1989: 930.
Cohen, I.B. (1972), “Introduction to the Reprint Edition”, in Clarke, 1730: [v]
[xxi].
Cohen, I.B.
(1990), “Newton’s Method and Newton’s Style”,
in Durham and
Purrington, 1990: 1557.
Corr, C.A. (1975), “Christian Wolff and Leibniz”, Journal of the History of Ideas,
36: 241262.
and Popkin, 1999: 1743.
Crasta, F.M. (1989), “Aspects of Eightenthcentury Cosmology”, Memorie della
Società Astronomica Italiana, 60: 823836.
Crawford, T. H. (1993) “An Interview with Bruno Latour”, Configurations 1.2:
247268.
Crosland, M.
(1977), “Presidential Address: History of Science
in a National
Context”, British Journal for the History of Science, 10: 95113.
CrowtherHeyck, K. (2003), “Wonderful
Secrets of Nature: Natural Knowl
edge and Religious Piety in Reformation Germany”, Isis, 94: 253273.
uljak, Z.
(1993), “Boškovi’s unobservables”,
International Studies in the Phi
losophy of Science, 7: 211224.
uljak, Z. (1995), “Some aspects
of explanation in Boškovi”,
International
Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 9:7384.
Cunningham, A. and Williams, P.
(1993), “Decentring the
‘big picture’: The
Origins of Modern Science and the modern origins of science”, British Jour
nal for the History of Science, 26: 407432.
Darnton, R. (1968), Mesmerism and the End of the Enlightenment in France, Cam
bridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Daston, L. (1992), “Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective”,
in Biagioli,
1999: 110123. First published in Social Studies of Science, 22: 597618.
E I G H T E E N T H - C E N T U R Y S C I E N C E S E C O N D A R Y
B I B L I O G R A P H Y 7
Daston, L.
(1997), “Afterword: The Ethos of Enlightenment”,
in Clark et al.,
1997: 495504.
Daston, L. (1998), “The Nature of Nature in Early Modern Europe”, Configura
tions, 6.2: 149172.
173193.
Dear, P. (2005), “What Is the History of Science the History Of: Early Modern
Roots of the Ideology of Modern Science”, Isis, 96: 390406.
Des Chene, D. (2000), “On Laws and Ends: A Response to Hattab and Menn”,
Perspectives on Science, 8: 144163.
Dhombres, J.G. (1984), “French Textbooks in the Sciences 17501850”, History
of Education, 13: 153161.
Dhombres, J. (1993), “Boscovich aux prises avec le calcul différentiel: art nou
veau des inégalités et pratiques anciennes” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: 437
465.
DiSalle, R. (1990), “The ‘Essential
Properties’ of Matter, Space, and
Time:
Comments on Michael Friedman”, in Bricker and Hughes, 1990: 203209.
Ducheyne, S. (2005),
“Mathematical Models in Newton’s
Principia: A New
View of the ‘Newtonian Style’”,
International Studies in
the Philosophy of
Science, 19: 119.
Dukes, P. (1981), “The Russian
Enlightenment”, in Porter and Teich,
1981:
176191.
Duncan, A.M. (1993), “Boscovich’s Solution to the Problems of the Chemists:
the Newtonian Tradition versus the
Autonomy of Chemistry” in
Boscovich, Vita e attività: 307319.
Durham, F. and Purrington, R.D.
(1990), Some Truer Method, New York: Co
lumbia University Press.
1999: 165198.
Elkana, Y. (1974), “Scientific and Metaphysical Problems: Euler and Kant”, in
R.S. Cohen and M.W. Wartofsky, Methodological and Historical Essays in the
Natural and Social Sciences, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, v.
XIV, D. Reidel Publishing Company,
DordrechHolland / Boston
U.S.A.:277305.
E I G H T E E N T H - C E N T U R Y S C I E N C E S E C O N D A R Y
B I B L I O G R A P H Y 8
Elkana, Y. (2000), “Rethinking — Not Unthinking — the Enlightenment”, on
Central European University’s web site:
web.ceu.hu/yehuda_rethinking_enlightnment.pdf.
Elliott, P. (2000), “The Birth of Public Science in the English Provinces: Natu
ral Philosophy in Derby, c. 16901760”, Annals of Science, 57: 61100.
Fara P. and Money D. (2004), “Isaac Newton and Augustan AngloLatin po
etry”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 35: 549571.
Feigenbaum L. (1987), “The Center of Oscillation versus the Textbook Writers
of the Early 18th Century”, in Berggren and Goldsein, 1987: 193202.
Feigenbaum, L. (1992), “The
Fragmentation of the
European Mathematical
Community”,
in P.M. Harman and A.E. Shapiro, The
investigation of diffi
cult things, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 383397.
Feingold, M. (1993), “A Jesuit
among Protestants: Boscovich in
England c.
17451820” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: 511526.
Fellmann, E.A. (1988), “The Principia
and Continental Mathematicians”, in
KingHele and Hall, 1988: 1334.
Ferrone, V. (1995), The Intellectual Roots of the Italian Enlightenment. Newtonian
Science, Religion, and Politics in
the Early Eighteenth Century,
translated by
Sue Brotherton, New Jersey: Humanities
Press. Originally published as
Scienza natura religione: Mondo newtoniano e cultura
italiana nel primo Sette
cento in 1982.
Findlen, P. (1995), “Translating the New Science: Women and the Circulation
of Knowledge in Enlightenment Italy”, Configurations, 3.2: 167206.
Findlen, P. (1997), “A Forgotten Newtonian: Women and Science in the Italian
Provinces”, in Clark et al., 1997: 313349.
Finocchiaro, M.A. (1993), “Gravity and
Intelligibility in Boscovich’s Natural
Philosophy” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: 149167.
Forbes, E.G. (1978), “Newton’s science and the Newtonian philosophy”, Vistas
in Astronomy, 22: 413418.
Force, J.E. (1983), “Some eminent Newtonians and providential geophysics at
the turn of the 17th century”, Earth Sciences History, 2: 410.
Force, J.E. (1985), William Whiston, Honest Newtonian, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Force, J.E.
(1987), “Science, deism and William Whiston’s
‘third way’”, Ideas
and Production: A Journal in the History of Ideas, 7: 1833.
Force, J.E.
(1994), “The God of Abraham and
Isaac (Newton)”, in J.E. Force
and R.H. Popkin (eds.), The Books of Nature and Scripture: Recent Essays on
E I G H T E E N T H - C E N T U R Y S C I E N C E S E C O N D A R Y
B I B L I O G R A P H Y 9
Natural Philosophy, Theology, and
Biblical Criticism in the Netherlands
of
Spinoza’s time and the British
Isles of Newton’s time, Dordrecht
/ Boston /
London: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 179200.
Force, J.E. (1999), “Newton, the
‘Ancients’ and the ‘Moderns’”
in Force and
Popkin, 1999: 237257.
Force, J.E. (2004), “Providence and Newton’s Pantokrator: Natural Law, Mira
cles, and Newtonian Science” in Force and Hutton, 2004: 6592.
Force, J.E and Hutton, S. (2004), Newton and Newtonianism: New Studies, New
York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Force, J.E. and Popkin, R.H.
(1999), Newton and Religion. Context, Nature and
Influence, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Frängsmyr, T. (1981), “The Enlightenment
in Sweden”,
in Porter and Teich,
1981: 164175.
Frängsmyr, T. (1990),
“The Mathematical Philosophy”, in
Frängsmyr et al.,
1990: 2744.
Press.
Franzinetti, G. (2008), “The idea
and the reality of Eastern
Europe in the
eighteenthcentury”, History of European Ideas, 34: 361–368.
Friedman, M. (1990), “Kant and Newton: Why Gravity is Essential to Matter”,
in Bricker and Hughes, 1990: 185202.
Friesen, J. (2006), “Hutchinsonianism
and the Newtonian Enlightenment”,
Centaurus,48: 4049.
Fuertes, J.F. and Garcia, J.L. (1995), “Roger Boscovich y su tiempo”, Llull, 18:
6792.
Galison, P.
(1999/1997), “Trading Zone: Coordinating Action and Belief”,
in
Biagioli, 1999: 136160. First published
in idem,
Image and Logic, Univ. of
Chicago Press: 781844.
Galison, P. (2004), “Removing Knowledge”, Critical Inquiry, 31: 229243.
Gascoigne, J. (1988), “From Bentley to the Victorians: the Rise and Fall of Brit
ish Newtonian Natural Theology”, Science in context 2: 219256.
Gaukroger, S. (1982),
“The Metaphysics of
Impenetrability: Euler’s Concep
tion of force”, Brithish Journal for the History of Science, 15: 132154.
Gaukroger, S. (1986), “Philosophical responses to the New Science in Britain,
16441799: A survey of texts”, Metascience: An International Review Journal
for the History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Science, 4: 6071.
E I G H T E E N T H - C E N T U R Y S C I E N C E S E C O N D A R Y
B I B L I O G R A P H Y 10
Ghins, M. (1996), “L’existence de l’espace et du temps selon Leonhard Euler”,
in J.F. Stoffel (ed.), Le
réalisme: Contributions au séminaire
d’ histoire des
sciences 19931994, Centre Interfacultaire d’ Étude en Histoire des Sciences,
LouvainlaNeuve: 185193.
Goldish, M. (1994), “Newton
on Kabbalah”, in J.E. Force
and R.H. Popkin
(eds.), The Books of Nature and Scripture: Recent Essays on Natural Philosophy,
Theology, and Biblical Criticism in
the Netherlands of Spinoza’s time
and the
British Isles of Newton’s
time, Dordrecht / Boston
/ London: Kluwer Aca
demic Publishers: 89103.
Goldish, M. (1998), Judaism in the Theology of sir Isaac Newton, Dordrecht / Bos
ton / London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Goldish, M. (1999), “Newtons Of the Church: Its Contents and Implication” in
Force and Popkin, 1999: 145164.
Golinski, J. (1986), “Science in the Enlightenment”, History of Science, 24: 411
424. [Review of Hankins’ Science and the Enlightenment]
Golinski, J. (1998), Making Natural Knowledge. Constructivism and the History of
Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gower, B. (1993), “Boscovich on Probabilistic Reasoning and the Combina
tion of Observations” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: 263279.
Grant, E. (1987), “Ways to Interpret the Terms ‘Aristotelian’ and ‘Aristotelian
ism’ in Medieval and Renaissance Natural Philosophy”, History of Science,
25: 335358.
Grant, E. (2008), “The Fate of Ancient Greek Natural Philosophy In the Mid
dle Ages: Islam and Western Christianity”, The Review of Metaphysics, 61:
503526.
Grmek, M.D. (1993), “Lexplication des phénomènes vitaux dans l’ oeuvre de
Boscovich” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: 321336.
Grmek, M.D. (1996), “La méthodologie
de Boscovich”, Revue d’histoire
des
sciences, 49: 379400.
Guerrini, A. (1985), “James Keill, George Cheyne, and Newtonian physiology,
16901740”, Journal of the History of Biology, 18: 247266.
Guicciardini, N. (1989), The Developments of Newtonian Calculus in Britain 1700
1800, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Guicciardini, N. (1995), “Johann Bernoulli, John Keill and the Inverse Problem
of Central Forces”, Annals of Science, 52: 537575.
E I G H T E E N T H - C E N T U R Y S C I E N C E S E C O N D A R Y
B I B L I O G R A P H Y 11
Guicciardini, N. (1996), “An episode
in the histoy of dynamics:
Jakob
Hermann’s proof (17161717) of proposition 1, book 1, of Newton’s Prin
cipia”, Historia Mathematica, 23: 167181.
Guicciardini, N. (2004), “Isaac Newton and the publication of his mathemati
cal manuscripts”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 35: 455470.
Hahn, R. (1990),
“The Laplacean View of Calculation”,
in Frängsmyr et al.,
1990: 363380.
Hahn, R. (1993), “The Ideological and Institutional Difficulties of a Jesuit Sci
entist in Paris” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: 112.
Hall, M.B. (1978), “Newton
and his theory of matter in
the 18th centrury”,
Vistas in Astronomy, 22: 453459.
Hampson, N. (1981), “The Enlightenment
in France”, in Porter and
Teich,
1981: 4153.
Hankins, T. (1970), Jean d’Alembert.
Science and the Enlightenment,
Oxford:
Clarendon Press.
Hankins, T.L. (1990), “Newton’s Mathematical Way a Century After the Prin
cipia”, in Durham and Purrington, 1990: 89112.
Haraway, D.J. (1988),
“Situated Knowledges: The Science in
Feminism and
the Priviledge of Partial Perspective”, in Biagioli, 1999: 172188. First pub
lished in Feminist Studies, 14: 575600.
Harkness, D.E. (1999), “Alchemy and Eschatology: Exploring the Connections
between John Dee and Isaak Newton” in Force and Popkin, 1999: 115.
Harman, P.M. (1988), “Newton
to Maxwell: The Principia
and British Phys
ics”, in KingHele and Hall, 1988: 7596.
Harman, P.M. (1993), “Boscovich and
British Natural Philosophy” in
Boscovich, Vita e attività: 561575.
Harré, R. (1980), “Knowledge”, in Rousseau and Porter, 1980: 1154.
Harris, S.J. (1993), “Boscovich, the
‘Boscovich Circle’ and
the Revival of the
Jeruit Science” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: 527548.
Harris, S.J. (1998), “Introduction: Thinking Locally, Acting Globally”, Configu
rations, 6.2: 131139.
Harrison, P. (1995), “Newtonian
science, miracles and the laws
of nature”,
Journal of the History of Ideas, 56: 531553.
Harrison, P. (2004), “Was Newton a Voluntarist?” in Force and Hutton, 2004:
3963.
Hart, R. (1999), “On
the Problem of Chinese Science”,
in Biagioli, 1999: 189
201.
E I G H T E E N T H - C E N T U R Y S C I E N C E S E C O N D A R Y
B I B L I O G R A P H Y 12
Hattab, H. (2000), “The problem of Secondary Causation in Descartes: A Rre
sponse to Des Chene”, Perspectives on Science, 8: 93118.
Haycock, D. B. (2004), “‘The longlost truth’: Sir Isaac Newton and the New
tonian pursuit of ancient knowledge”, Studies
in History and Philosophy of
Science, 35: 605623.
Heard, J. (2007), “Of Apes and Algebraists”, Viewpoint, 83: 13.
Heidarzadeh, T. (2006), “The Reception of Newton’s Theory of Cometary Tail
Formation”, Centaurus, 48: 5065.
Heilbron, J.L. (1980), “Experimental
natural philosophy”, in Rousseau
and
Porter, 1980: 357387.
Heilbron, J.L. (1990), “Introductory Essay”, in Frängsmyr et al., 1990: 123.
Heimann, P.M. (1977), “Geometry and Nature: Leibniz and Johann Bernoulli’s
Theory of Motion”, Centaurus, 21: 126.
Heimann, P.M. and McGuire J.E.
(1971), “Newtonian Forces and
Lockean
Powers: Concepts of Matter in
EighteenthCentury Thought”, Historical
Studies in the Physical Sciences, 3: 233306.
Hellyer, M.A. (1998), The last
of the Aristotelians: The
transformation of Jesuit
physics in Germany,
16301773, Doctoral Dissertation, University
of Cali
fornia, San Diego [adviser: Robert S. Westman].
Henry, J. (1992), “The Scientific Revolution in England”, in Porter and Teich,
1992: 178209.
Henry, J.
(1994), “‘Pray Do Not Ascribe
that Notion
to Me’: God and New
ton’s Gravity”, in J.E. Force and R.H. Popkin (eds.), The Books of Nature and
Scripture: Recent Essays
on Natural Philosophy, Theology,
and Biblical Criti
cism in the Netherlands of Spinoza’s time and the British Isles of Newton’s time,
Dordrecht / Boston / London: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 123147.
Hill, E.
(1961), “Roger Boscovich. A biographical essay”
in Whyte, 1961: 17
101.
1730
(Germany), Doctoral Dissertation, University
of Virginia [advisers:
H.C. Eric Midelfort and Allan Megill].
Homann, F.A. (1993), “On Boscovich’s De natura et usu infinitorum and Other
Mathematical Works: Translation
and Commentary” in Boscovich, Vita
e
attività: 407436.
Home, R.W.
(1988), “Leonhard Euler’s ‘AntiNewtonianan’
theory of light”,
Annals of Science, 45: 521533.
E I G H T E E N T H - C E N T U R Y S C I E N C E S E C O N D A R Y
B I B L I O G R A P H Y 13
Hughes, R.I.G.
(1990), “Reason and Experiment
in Newton’s Opticks: Com
ments on Peter Achinstein”, in Bricker and Hughes, 1990: 175184.
Hutton, S. (1994), “More, Newton, and the Language of Biblical Prophecy”, in
J.E. Force and R.H. Popkin (eds.), The Books of Nature and Scripture: Recent
Essays on Natural Philosophy, Theology,
and Biblical Criticism in
the Nether
lands of Spinoza’s time and the British Isles of Newton’s time, Dordrecht / Bos
ton / London: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 3953.
Hutton, S. (1999), “The Seven Trumpets and the Seven Vials: Apocalypticism
and Christology in Newton’s Theological Writings” in Force and Popkin,
1999: 165178.
Hutton, S. (2004), “Emilie du Châtelet’s Institutions de physique as a document
in the history of French Newtonianism”, Studies
in History and Philosophy
of Science, 35: 515531.
Hutton, S. (2004a), “Women, Science, and Newtonianism: Emilie du Châtelet
versus Francesco Algarotti” in Force and Hutton, 2004: 183203.
Iliffe, R. (1994), “‘Making a Shew’: Apocalyptic Herneneytics and the Sociol
ogy of Christian Idolatry in the Work of Isaac Newton and Henry More”,
in J.E. Force and R.H. Popkin (eds.), The Books of Nature and Scripture: Re
cent Essays on Natural Philosophy, Theology, and Biblical Criticism in the Neth
erlands of Spinoza’s time and
the British Isles of Newton’s
time, Dordrecht /
Boston / London: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 5588.
Iliffe, R. (1999), “Those ‘Whose
Business It Is To Cavill’:
Newton’s
AntiCatholicism” in Force and Popkin, 1999: 97119.
Iliffe, R.
(2004), “Abstract considerations: disciplines and
the incoherence of
Newton’s natural philosophy”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science,
35: 427454.
Iliffe, R. (2004a), “Digitizing Isaac: The Newton Project and an Electronic Edi
tion of Newton’s Papers” in Force and Hutton, 2004: 2338.
Iliffe, R. (2004b), “Prosecuting Athanasius: Protestant Forensics
and the Mirrors of
Persecution” in Force and Hutton, 2004: 113-154. Iliffe, R. (2007),
Newton: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press:
New
York. Iltis, C.
(1977), “Madame du Châtelets metaphysics and mechanics”, Studies
in the History and Philosophy of Science, 8: 2948.
Indorato, L., Nastasi, P. (1993), “Boscovich and the Vis Viva Controversy” in
Boscovich, Vita e attività: 169194.
Israel, J. (2006), “Enlightenment! Which Enlightenment?” Journal of the History
of Ideas, 67: 523545.
E I G H T E E N T H - C E N T U R Y S C I E N C E S E C O N D A R Y
B I B L I O G R A P H Y 14
Ivanovi, D.M. (1993), “On Some Aspects of Boscovich’s Curve” in Boscovich,
Vita e attività: 4957.
Jackson, M.W. (1994), “A spectrum of Belief: Goethe’s ‘Republic’ versus New
tonian ‘Despotism’”, Social Studies of Science, 24: 673701.
Jacob, M.C. (1976), “Millenarianism and Science in the Late Seventeenth Cen
tury”, in Yolton, 1994: 493499. First published in Journal for the History of
Ideas, 37: 335341.
Jacob, M.C. (1977), “Newtonianism and
the Origins of
the Enlightenment: A
Reassessment”, EighteenthCentury Studies, 11: 125.
Jacob, M.C. (1978), “Newtonian science and the radical Enlightenment”, Vistas
in Astronomy, 22: 545555.
Jacob, M.C. and Sturkenboom, D. (2003), “A Women’s Scientific Society in the
West: The Late EighteenthCentury Assimilation of Science”, Isis, 94: 217
252.
Jacob, M. (2004), “Introduction” in Force and Hutton, 2004: ixxvii.
James, F.A.J.L. (1993), “Reality or Rhetoric? Boscovichianism in Britain:
the
Cases of Davy, Herschel and Faraday” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: 577585.
James, P.J., (1986), “William Whiston honest Newtonian [book review]”, His
tory and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 8:338441.
Kadi, A. (1993), “A Literary and Spiritual Profile of Boscovich” in Boscovich,
Vita e attività: 1325.
Katz, D.S. (1994), “‘Moses’s Principia’: Hutchinsonianism and Newton’s Crit
ics”, in J.E. Force and R.H. Popkin (eds.), The Books of Nature and Scripture:
Recent Essays
on Natural Philosophy, Theology,
and Biblical Criticism in the
Netherlands of Spinoza’s time and the British Isles of Newton’s time, Dordrecht
/ Boston / London: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 201211.
Kiernan, C. (1973), The Enlightenment and science in eighteenthcentury France in
Besterman, T. (ed.) Studies on Voltaire and the eighteenth century, vol. LIXa,
the Voltaire Foundation, Oxfordshire. [Extracts]
KingHele, D.G. and Hall, A.R. (eds.) (1988), Newton’s Principia and its Legacy.
Proceedings of a Royal Society discussion meeting, held on 30 June 1987, Lon
don: The Royal Society.
Klein, J. (1968), Greek Mathematical Thought and the Origin of Algebra, translated
by Eva Brann, with an Appendix
containing Vieta’s Introduction to
the
Analytical Art, translated by
the Reverend
J. Winfree Smith, Cambridge,
MA and London: The M.I.T. Press. Originally published
in 1934 (part I)
and 1936 (part II).
E I G H T E E N T H - C E N T U R Y S C I E N C E S E C O N D A R Y
B I B L I O G R A P H Y 15
Klein, J.
(1985), Lectures and Essays, edited by Robert Williamson and Elliott
Zuckerman, Annapolis, Maryland: St. John’s College Press.
Knoespel, K.J.
(1999), “Interpretive Strategies
in Newton’s Theologiae gentilis
origines philosophiae” in Force and Popkin, 1999: 179202.
Kochavi, M.Z. (1994), “One Prophet Interprets Another: Sir Isaac Newton and
Daniel”, in J.E. Force and R.H. Popkin (eds.), The Books of Nature and Scrip
ture: Recent Essays on Natural Philosophy, Theology, and Biblical Criticism
in
the Netherlands of Spinoza’s time
and the British Isles of
Newton’s time,
Dordrecht / Boston / London: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 105122.
Koyré, A. (1943), “Galileo and
the Scientific Revolution of the
Seventeenth
Century”, The Philosophical Review, 52: 333348.
Kraye, J. (2000), “The Immortality
of the Soul in the Renaissance:
between
Natural Philosophy and Theology”, Signatures, 1: Ch2.1Ch2.24.
Kubbinga, H.H. (1993), “La théorie de la matière de Boscovich: l’atomisme de
points et le concept d’
‘individu substanctiel’” in Boscovich, Vita e attività:
281306.
Latour, B.
(1992), “One More Turn After
the Social Turn”,
in Biagioli, 1999:
276289. First published in E. McMullin (ed.), The Social Dimensions of Sci
ence, Univ. of Notre Dame Press: 272294.
Latour, B. (1993), “Pasteur on Lactic Acid Yeast: A Partial Semiotic Analysis”,
Configurations 1.1: 129146.
Laudan, L.L. (1968), “Introduction”, in Maclaurin, 1968: ixxxv.
Laudan, R. (1993), “Histories of
the Sciences and their Uses: A
review to
1913”, History of Science, xxxi: 134.
Leshem, A. (2003), Newton
on Mathematics and Spiritual Purity,
Dordrecht:
Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Philosophy: Enlightenment Discourses on the Human Condition”, in Liv
ingstone and Withers, 1999: 93119.
Livingstone, D.N. and Withers, C.W.J. (eds.)
(1999), Geography and Enlighten
ment, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lloyd, G.E.R. (1991), “The invention of Nature” in idem, Methods and Problems
in Greek Science, Cambridge: 417434.
Lord, F.H. (2000), Piety, politeness, and power: Formation of a Newtonian culture
in New England, 17271779, Doctoral
Dissertation, University of New
Hampshire [adviser: Jan Golinski].
E I G H T E E N T H - C E N T U R Y S C I E N C E S E C O N D A R Y
B I B L I O G R A P H Y 16
Lüthy, C. (2000), “What
to Do With SeventeenthCentury Natural
Philoso
phy? A Taxonomic Problem”, Perspectives on Science, 8: 164195.
Lynn, M.R. (1997), Enlightenment
in the republic of science: The popularization of
natural philosophy in eighteenthcentury
Paris, Doctoral Dissertation, The
University of Wiskonsin – Madison [adviser: Domenico Sella].
Maffioli, C.S. & Palm L.C.
(1989), Italian Scientists in
the Low Countries in the
XVIIth and XVIIIth Centuries, AmsterdamAtlanta, GA: Rodopi.
Maffioli, C.S. & Palm L.C. (1989a), “Introduction”, in Maffioli & Palm, 1989: 1
8.
Maluf, R.B. (1985),
Jean Antoine Nollet
and Experimental Natural Philosophy
in
EighteenthCentury France, Dissertation, University of Oklahoma.
Mandelbrote, S. (1994), “Isaac Newton and Thomas Burnet: Biblical Criticism
and the Crisis of Late
SeventeenthCentury England”, in J.E.
Force and
R.H. Popkin (eds.), The Books of Nature and Scripture: Recent Essays on Natu
ral Philosophy, Theology, and Biblical Criticism in the Netherlands of Spinoza’s
time and the British Isles of Newton’s time, Dordrecht / Boston / London: Klu
wer Academic Publishers: 149178.
Mandelbrote, S. (2004), “Newton and Newtonianism: an introduction”, Stud
ies in History and Philosophy of Science, 35: 415425.
Mandelbrote, S. (2004a), “EighteenthCentury
Reactions to Newton’s Anti
Trinitarianism” in Force and Hutton, 2004: 93111.
Marchand, J.W. (1972), “The Reception of Science among German Men of Let
ters in the Late Eighteenth Century” in The Influence of Early Enlightenment
Thought upon German Classical Science and Letters. Problems
for Future Dis
cussion, Science History Publication, New York: 1926.
Marcialis, M.T. (1989), “Francesco Algarotti’s worldly Newtonianism”, Memo
rie della Società Astronomica Italiana, 60: 807821.
Marcovi, Z. (1961), “Boscovich’s Theoria” in Whyte, 1961: 127152.
Markley, R. (1999), “Newton, Corruption, and the Tradition of Universal His
tory” in Force and Popkin, 1999: 121143.
Martinovi, I. (1993), “Boscovich on the Problem of Generatio Velocitatis: Gene
sis and Methodological Implications” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: 5979.
Mazzotti, M. (2004), “Newton for
ladies: gentility, gender and radical
cul
ture”, British Journal for the History of Science, 37: 119146.
McGuire, J.E.
(1990), “Predicates of Pure Existence: Newton on God’s Space
and Time”, in Bricker and Hughes, 1990: 91108.
E I G H T E E N T H - C E N T U R Y S C I E N C E S E C O N D A R Y
B I B L I O G R A P H Y 17
McMullin, E. (1978), Newton in Matter and Activity, Notre Dame, London: Uni
versity of Notre Dame Press.
Menn, S. (2000), “On Dennis Des Chene’s Physiologia”, Perspectives on Science,
8: 119143.
Mercer, C. (1993), “The Vitality and Importance of Early Modern Aristotelian
ism”
in Sorell, T. (ed.), The Rise of Modern Philosophy. The Tension between
the New and Traditional Philosophies
from Machiavelli to Leibniz,
Oxford,
Clarendon Press: 3367.
Mintzker, Y. (2008),
“‘A Word Newly Introduced
into Language’: The Ap
pearance and Spread of ‘Social’
in French Enlightened Thought, 1745–
1765”, History of European Ideas, 34: 500–513.
Misa, T.J. and Schot, J. (2005), “Inventing Europe: Technology and the Hidden
Integration of Europe”, History and Technology, 21: 1–19.
Mollenauer, R. (1965), “Introduction” in idem (ed.), Introduction to Modernity.
A Symposium on EighteenthCentury Thought, Austin, Texas, University of
Texas Press: 311.
Montgomery, S.L. (2000), Science in translation: movements of knowledge through
cultures and time, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Müller, K. (1993), “Physics and
the Deity: The
Ideas of R. Boscovich and J.
Priestley”, Enlightenment and Dissent, 12: 4962.
Munitz, M.K. (1969), “Introduction” in
I. Kant, Universal Natural History and
Theory of the Heavens, Ann Arbor Paperbacks, The University of Michigan
Press: vxxiii.
Murrin, M. (1999), “Newton’s Apocalypse”
in Force and Popkin, 1999: 203
220.
Newton Project
Nobre, S. (1994), “La contribución de Christian Wolff (16791754) a la popula
rización de las matemáticas en el primera mitad del siglo XVIII”, Mathesis:
Filosofía e Historia de las Matemáticas, 10: 153169.
Novy, L.
(1993), “Las matemáticas en
la enciclopedia de Diderot y DAlem
bert”, Llull: Boletin de la Sociedad Española de Historia de las Ciencias, 16: 265
284.
52: 349365.
Osler, M. (2004), “The New Newtonian Scholarship and the Fate of the Scien
tific Revolution” in Force and Hutton, 2004: 113.
E I G H T E E N T H - C E N T U R Y S C I E N C E S E C O N D A R Y
B I B L I O G R A P H Y 18
Outram D.
(1997), “The Enlightenment Our Contemporary”,
in Clark et al.,
1997: 3240.
Pagden, A. (1988), “The reception
of the ‘New Philosophy’ in
eighteenth
century Spain”, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 51: 126140.
Pappas, J. (1996), “R.J. Boscovich et l’Académie des sciences de Paris”, Revue
d’histoire des sciences, 49: 401414.
Pater, C. de (1989), “The Textbooks of ’sGravesande and van Musschenbroek
in Italy”, in Maffioli & Palm, 1989: 231241.
Pater, C. de (1994), “Willem
Jacob ’sGravesande (16881742)
and Newton’s
Regulae philosophandi, 1742”, Lias:
Sources and Documents Relating to
the
Early Modern History of Ideas, 21: 257294.
Penha, M.C.D. (1999), “Euler’s ‘Harmony’ beween the principles of ‘Rest’ and
‘Least Action’”, Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 54: 6786.
Pepe, L. (1993), “Boscovich and the Mathematical Historiography of His Time.
An Unpublished Letter by d’Alembert”
in Boscovich, Vita e attività:
491
509.
Perl, M.R. (1969), “Physics and Metaphysics in Newton, Leibniz and Clarke”,
in Yolton, 1994: 500519. First published
in Journal
for the History of Ideas,
30: 507526.
Pfizenmaier, T.C. (1997), The
trinitarian theology of Dr. Samuel
Clarke (1675
1729), LeidenNew YorkKöln: Brill.
Phemister, P. (1993), “Locke,
Sergeant, and Scientific Method” in
Sorell, T.
(ed.), The Rise of Modern Philosophy. The Tension between the New and Tradi
tional Philosophies from Machiavelli to Leibniz, Oxford, Clarendon Press: 231
249.
1940.
son”, in Livingstone and Withers, 1999: 372398.
Pickering, A. (1993), “The Mangle of Practice: Agency and Emergence
in the
Sociology of Science”, in Biagioli,
1999: 372393. First published in
The
American Journal of Sociology, 99: 559589.
Pole, J.R. (1981), “Enlightenment and the Politics of American Nature”, in Por
ter and Teich, 1981: 192214.
Poni, C. (1993), “The Craftsman
and
the Good Engineer: Technical Practice
and Theoretical Mechanics in J.T. Desaguliers”, History and Technology, 10:
215232.
E I G H T E E N T H - C E N T U R Y S C I E N C E S E C O N D A R Y
B I B L I O G R A P H Y 19
Popkin, R.H. (1993), “Scepticism and Modernity” in Sorell, T. (ed.), The Rise of
Modern Philosophy. The Tension between the New and Traditional Philosophies
from Machiavelli to Leibniz, Oxford, Clarendon Press: 1532.
Porter, R. (1981a), “Preface”, in Porter and Teich, 1981: viiviii.
Popkin, R.H. (2004), “Plans for Publishing Newton’s Religious and Alchemi
cal Manuscripts, 1982–1998” in Force and Hutton, 2004: 1522.
Porter, R. (1981b), “The Enlightenment in England”, in Porter and Teich, 1981:
118.
Porter, R. (1999), “Afterword”, in Livingstone and Withers, 1999: 415431.
Porter, R. and Teich, M.
(1981), The Enlightenment
in National Context, Cam
bridge: Cambridge University Press. [Further reading.] [Index.]
Porter, R. and Teich, M. (1992), The scientific revolution in national context, New
York, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Porter, R. and Teich, M. (1992a), “Introduction”, in Porter and Teich, 1992: 1
10.
Porter, T. (1992), “Quantification and the Accounting Ideal in Science”, in Bi
agioli, 1999: 394405. First published in Social Studies of Science, 22: 633651.
Porter, T.M. (1990),
“The Quantification of Uncertainty after
1700: Statistics
Socially Constructed?”, in G.M.
Furstenburg (ed.), Acting under uncer
tainty: Multidisciplinary conceptions,
Kluwer Academic Publishers,
Dordrecht: 4575.
Principe, L.M. (2004), “Reflections on Newton’s Alchemy in Light of the New
Historiography of Alchemy” in Force and Hutton, 2004: 205219.
Proverbio, E.
(1993), “Boscovich’s Project
for Verifying Newton’s Theory on
the Nature of Light” in Boscovich, Vita e attività: 337362.
Purrington, R.D. and Durham, F. (1990), “Newton’s Legacy”, in Durham and
Purrington, 1990: 113.
Ragep, F.J. (1996), “Introduction”
in F.J. Ragep and S.P. Ragep
(eds.), Tradi
tion, transmission, transformation.
Proceedings of two Conferences on
Pre
Modern Science Held at
the University
of Oklahoma, E.J. Brill, LeidenNew
YorkKöln: xvxxxiv.
Raman, V.V. (1985), “The D’AlembertEuler
rivalry”, Mathematical Intelligen
cer, 7: 3541.
Rattansi, P.M. (1981), “Voltaire and the Enlightenment Image of Newton”
in
LloydJones, H., Pearl, V. and Worden, B.
(eds.), History and Imagination.
Essays
in honour of H.R. TrevorRoper, Holmes and Meier, New York: 218
231.
E I G H T E E N T H - C E N T U R Y S C I E N C E S E C O N D A R Y
B I B L I O G R A P H Y 20
Remmert, V.R. (forthcoming), “Galileo, God and Mathematics”.
Rider, R.E. (1990) “Bibliographical Afterword”, in Frängsmyr et al., 1990: 381
396.
Rider, R.E. (1990), “Measure of
Ideas, Rule of Language: Mathematics
and
Language in the 18th century”, in Frängsmyr et al., 1990: 113140.
Rider, R.E. (1993), “In a
Foreign Language: Boscovich and
Algebra” in
Boscovich, Vita e attività: 467476.
Rieber, A.J.
(1995), “Politics and Technology
in EingteenthCentury Russia”,
Science in Context, 8: 341368.
Roberts, L. (1997),
“Going Dutch: Situating Science in
the Dutch Enlighten
ment”, in Clark et al., 1997: 350388.
Robin, R.S. (1998), Science for
children and the untutored in
eighteenthcentury
England
(Richard Lovell Edgeworth, Thomas Day,
James Ferguson, John New
bery,
Francesco Algarotti), Doctoral Dissertation, City University
of New
York [adviser: James R. Jacob].
Robinet, A. (1991), “La
conquête de la
chaire de mathématiques de Padoue
par les leibniziens”, Revue d’Histoire des Sciences et de leur Applications, 44:
181201.
Rogers, G.A.J. (1999), “Newton and the Guaranteeing God” in Force and Pop
kin, 1999: 221235.
Ross, S. (1962), “Scientist: The story of a word”, Annals of Science, 18: 6585.
Roudometof, V. (1998),
“From Rum Millet
to Greek Nation: Enlightenment,
Secularization, and National Identity
in Ottoman Balkan Society, 1453
1821”, Journal of Modern Greek Studies, 16: 1148.
Rouse, J. (1991), “Philosophy of Science and the persistent narratives of Mod
ernity”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 22:141162.
Rousseau, G.S.
(1987), “‘Wicked Whiston’ and
the Scriblerians: Another An
cientsModern Controversy”, Studies in EighteenthCentury Culture, 17: 17
44.
historiography
of EighteenthCentrury Science, Cambridge: Cambridge Uni
versity Press.
Ruderman, D. (1997), “On defining
a Jewish Stance
toward Newtonianism:
Eliakim ben Abraham Hart’s Wars of the Lord”, Science in Context, 10: 677
692.
Rupke, N. (2000), “Translation studies in the history of science: The example
of ‘Vestiges’”, British Journal for the History of Science, 33: 209222.
E I G H T E E N T H - C E N T U R Y S C I E N C E S E C O N D A R Y
B I B L I O G R A P H Y 21
Rynasiewicz, R. (1995),
“By Their Properties, Causes
and Effects: Newtons
Scholium on Time, Space, Place and Motion”, Studies
in History and Phi
losophy of Science, 26: 133153 and 295321.
Sabra, A.I. (1996), “The appropriation and subsequent naturalization of Greek
science in medieval Islam: A preliminary statement” in F.J. Ragep and S.P.
Ragep (eds.), Tradition, transmission, transformation. Proceedings of two Con
ferences on PreModern Science Held at the University of Oklahoma, E.J. Brill,
LeidenNew YorkKöln: 127.
Schaffer, S. (1980), “Natural Philosophy”, in Rousseau and Porter, 1980: 5591.
Schaffer, S.
(1989), “Glass Works: Newton’s Prisms and
the Uses of Experi
ment”
in D. Gooding, T. Pinch, S. Schaffer
(eds.), The Uses of Experiment.
Studies in the natural sciences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 67
104.
Schaffer, S. (1991), “The Eighteenth Brumaire of Bruno Latour”, Studies in His
tory and Philosophy of Science, 22:174192.
Schama, S. (1981), “The Enlightenment
in the Netherlands”, in Porter
and
Teich, 1981: 5471.
Schneider, I. (1984), “The
role of Leibniz and Jakob Bernoulli
for the devel
opment of probability theory”, Llull: Boletin de la Sociedad Española de His
toria de las Ciencias, 7: 6989.
Schofield, R.E. (1961), “Boscovich and Priestley’s theory of matter” in Whyte,
1961: 168172.
Schubring, G. (1987), “On the methodology of analysing historical textbooks:
Lacroix as textbook author”, For the learning of mathematics, 7: 4151.
Scott, W.L. (1972), “Introduction” in
The Influence of Early
Enlightenment
Thought upon German Classical Science and Letters. Problems
for Future Dis
cussion, Science History Publication, New York: xixii.
Secord, J.A. (2004), “Knowledge in transit”, Isis, 95: 654672.
Shapin, S.
(1980), “Social uses of science”,
in Rousseau and Porter, 1980: 93
139.
Shapin, S. (1981), “Of Gods and Kings: Natural Philosophy and Politics in the
LeibnizClarke Disputes”, Isis, 72: 187215.
Smolinski, R. (1999), “The Logic
of Millennial Thought: Sir
Isaac Newton
Among His Contemporaries” in Force and Popkin, 1999: 259289.
Snobelen, S. (1997), “Caution,
conscience, and
the Newtonian Reformation:
The public and private heresies
of Newton, Clarke, and
Whiston”,
Enlightenment and Dissent, 16:151184.
E I G H T E E N T H - C E N T U R Y S C I E N C E S E C O N D A R Y
B I B L I O G R A P H Y 22
Snobelen, S. D. (2004), “William Whiston, Isaac Newton and the crisis of pub
licity”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 35: 473603.
Snobelen, S.D. (2004a), “Lust, Pride,
and Ambition: Isaac Newton and
the
Devil” in Force and Hutton, 2004: 155181.
Speiser, D.
(1996), “The Kepler Problem
from Newton to Johann Bernoulli”,
Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 50: 103116.
Stewart, L.
(1981), “Samuel Clarke, Newtonianism and
the Factions of Post
Revolutionary England”, in Yolton, 1994: 52053