+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work...

Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work...

Date post: 08-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
36
Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Area How are they working?
Transcript
Page 1: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

Northern Pike Regulations in the

Little Falls Work Area

How are they working?

Page 2: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

Big Birch Lake

� Regulations since 1996

� Maximum length of pike sampled increasing

� Maximum age of pike sampled increasing

� More fish over 30 inches – still few over 36”� More fish over 30 inches – still few over 36”

� More fish over 5 years of age

� No trends in proportion of fish over 24”

� Walleye and panfish populations doing well

� Sunset date March 1, 2015

Page 3: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

33

35

37

39Le

ng

th I

n I

nch

es

Big Birch - Largest Pike Sampled in Ice-out Trapnets

27

29

31

1993 1994 1995 1996 1998 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2010

Len

gth

In

In

che

s

Page 4: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

8

10

12

Ag

e I

n Y

ea

rsBig Birch Ice-out Trapnets- Maximum Age of Pike Sampled

0

2

4

6

1994 1995 1996 1998 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009

Ag

e I

n Y

ea

rs

Page 5: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

5

6

7

8

9

10A

ge

In

Ye

ars

Big Birch Gillnets- Maximum Age of Pike Sampled

0

1

2

3

4

5

1981 1986 1991 1995 1999 2003 2010

Ag

e I

n Y

ea

rs

Page 6: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

25

30

35

40

45

50

Nu

mb

er

Ov

er

30

"Big Birch Number of NOP>30"-Ice-Out Trapnets

0

5

10

15

20

25

1993 1994 1995 1996 1998 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2010

Nu

mb

er

Ov

er

30

"

Page 7: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

8

10

12

14

% O

ve

r 3

0"

Big Birch NOP %>30" -Ice-out Trapnets

0

2

4

6

1993 1994 1995 1996 1998 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2010

% O

ve

r 3

0"

Page 8: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

16.0%

18.0%

20.0%%

of

Pik

e S

am

ple

d

Big Birch Ice-out Trapnets % Age 6 and Older

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

1994 1995 1996 1998 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009

% o

f P

ike

Sa

mp

led

Page 9: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%%

of

Pik

e S

am

ple

dBig Birch Gillnets % Age 6 and Older

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

1981 1986 1991 1995 1999 2003 2010

% o

f P

ike

Sa

mp

led

Page 10: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

25

30

35

40

45

% O

ve

r 2

4"

Big Birch %NOP>24"-Gillnets

0

5

10

15

20

1981 1986 1991 1995 1999 2003 2007 2010

% O

ve

r 2

4"

Page 11: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

Big Swan Lake

� Regulations since 1997

� Maximum length of pike sampled increasing

� Maximum age of pike sampled increasing

� More fish over 30’’ – 7 fish>36” since 2005� More fish over 30’’ – 7 fish>36” since 2005

� More fish age 6 and older

� More fish over 24 inches

� Walleye and panfish unchanged

� Sunset date March 1, 2013.

Page 12: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

36

37

38

39

40

Len

gth

in

In

che

sBig Swan Lake - Ice-Out TN Largest NOP Sampled

(Inches)

30

31

32

33

34

35

1993 1994 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009

Len

gth

in

In

che

s

Page 13: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

6

8

10

12

Ag

e I

n Y

ea

rsBig Swan Ice-out Trapnets-Maximum Age of Pike

Sampled

0

2

4

6

1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009

Ag

e I

n Y

ea

rs

Page 14: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

6

7

8

9

10A

ge

In

Ye

ars

Big Swan Gillnets-Maximum Age of Pike Sampled

0

1

2

3

4

5

1958 1981 1986 1991 1996 2000 2004 2008

Ag

e I

n Y

ea

rs

Page 15: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

40

50

60

70

Big Swan Number of NOP>30" - Ice-Out Trapnets

0

10

20

30

1993 1994 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009

Page 16: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

10

12

14

16

18N

um

be

r o

f F

ish

Big Swan NOP Number>30" - Gillnets

0

2

4

6

8

1981 1986 1991 1996 2000 2004 2008

Nu

mb

er

of

Fis

h

Page 17: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

40

50

60

70

% o

ve

r 2

4"

Big Swan Lake NOP%>24"-Gillnets

0

10

20

30

1981 1986 1991 1996 2000 2004 2008

% o

ve

r 2

4"

Page 18: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

30

40

50

60

% O

ve

r 2

4"

Big Swan Lake - %NOP>24" - Ice-Out Trapnets

0

10

20

30

1993 1994 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009

% O

ve

r 2

4

Page 19: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

20%

25%

30%

35%%

of

Pik

e S

am

ple

d

Big Swan Ice-out Trapnets % Age 6 and Older

0%

5%

10%

15%

1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009

% o

f P

ike

Sa

mp

led

Page 20: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

% o

f P

ike

Sa

mp

led

Big Swan Gillnets % Age 6 and Older

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

1958 1981 1986 1991 1996 2000 2004 2008

% o

f P

ike

Sa

mp

led

Page 21: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

Long Lake (Burtrum)

� Regulations since 2003

� Maximum age increasing - % >Age 6 higher

� Maximum length no trend

� More fish over 30 inches� More fish over 30 inches

� Proportion over 24” variable- currently high

� Largest pike sampled= 36.5 inches in 2004

� Ice-out scheduled for 2012 – needed for trend evaluation

� Sunset date March 1, 2013.

Page 22: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

6

7

8

9

10

Nu

mb

er

of

Fis

hLong Lake NOP Number>30" - Gillnets

0

1

2

3

4

5

1983 1988 1993 1998 2004 2010

Nu

mb

er

of

Fis

h

Page 23: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

5

6

7

8

9A

ge

In

Ye

ars

Long Lake - Maximum Age of Pike In Gillnets

0

1

2

3

4

1988 1993 1998 2004 2010

Ag

e I

n Y

ea

rs

Page 24: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

16.0%

18.0%

% o

f P

ike

Sa

mp

led

Long Lake Gillnets - % Pike Age 6 and Older

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

1988 1993 1998 2004 2010

% o

f P

ike

Sa

mp

led

Page 25: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

“Conservation” Regulations Lakes

� Three lakes in this category – Bass (40” min.),

Cedar (40” min.), and Little Sauk (24”-30”)

� Due to increased access and pressure on

small lakes with quality fish presentsmall lakes with quality fish present

� Goal to maintain desirable size structure

� No sunset dates – not experimental

� Protective regulations not subject to

modification

Page 26: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

Cedar Lake (Upsala)

� 223 pike sampled in Ice-out trapnets before regs. – ave. length 23.0”, 7.6%> 30”

� 558 pike sampled in Ice-out trapnets since 2006 – ave. length 24.1”, 15.6%> 30”

� Max. length has not changed in trapnets� Max. length has not changed in trapnets

� Max. age 10 in 2008, age 8 oldest sampled in past surveys

� Anglers reported several 40+” fish during winter of 2010-11, 47” largest

� Regulation since 2002

Page 27: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

Bass Lake (Burtrum)

� Regulations since 2003

� Very low catches of pike prior to 1998 – No pike in 2004 gillnets

� 1998 Gillnets – 11%> 24”, 6%> 30”, max. 41”� 1998 Gillnets – 11%> 24”, 6%> 30”, max. 41”

� 2010 Gillnets – 28%> 24”, 6%> 30”, max. 37.4”

� 2002 Ice-out – 60%> 24”, 18%> 30”, max. 38.1”

� 2010 Ice-out – 16%> 24”, 6%> 30”, max. 41.3”

� 2007 Year Class exceptionally strong , 70%+

� Fish up to Age 13 in 2010, up to Age 10 in past

Page 28: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

Little Sauk Lake

� Regulations since 2000

� Only 3 of 195 pike sampled in gillnets from 1954-1997 were over 30”.

� Of 57 pike sampled since regs. began 7 have � Of 57 pike sampled since regs. began 7 have exceeded 30”.

� Max. length sampled before regs. = 31”, largest pike sampled (35.5”) in 2009

� Max. age of 6 prior to regs., fish up to age 9 in 2009 gillnets

Page 29: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

General Observations

� Regulations have increased the number of large pike (over 30 inches)

� Regulations have resulted in more pike reaching 6 years of age and older

� Regulations have not resulted in a reduced � Regulations have not resulted in a reduced abundance of small pike

� Regulations have not delivered fish community benefits such as more walleye and perch

� Regulations have not produced negative impacts on walleye, perch, and panfish populations

Page 30: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

A Postcard Survey of Northern Pike Anglers

and Spearers in Central Minnesota

By: Brady Becker, Carl Bublitz

DNR Fisheries – Little Falls

March 2011

Page 31: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

� Randomized subsample generated from license

bureau query of 9,278 licensed anglers & spearers in

study area

� 550 cards – Initial mailing, 315 cards -second mailing

Scope of ProjectScope of Project

� Explanation letter sent with cards

� 315 cards returned – 58% response rate

Page 32: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

Survey Card

Page 33: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

Spearers

� Only category of user where opposition to regulations

(57%) was greater than support

� Tended to take more angling/spearing trips/yr. than non-

spearers

� Most (81%) also ice fished for northern pike

� 76% had visited regulated lakes – highest of all user

categoriescategories

� 78% responded they wanted to see more medium to

large pike

28%

57%

15%

Spearers - Support For

Northern Pike 24-36"

Slot

% Support

% Oppose

% No Opinion

Page 34: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

Support From Other User Categories

� Support outweighed opposition in all categories of

users (except spearers)

� Ice anglers who sought pike but did not spear

supported regulations 62% to 21%

(25% no opinion) (25% no opinion)

� Anglers who did not ice fish for pike supported

regulations 50% to 21% (29% no opinion)

� 65% of anglers (excluding spearers) who took more

than 10 trips/yr. supported regulations

� 68% of anglers (excluding spearers) who targeted

pike >30% of the time supported regulations

Page 35: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

% o

f U

ser

Su

pp

ort

Support For Regulations Among User Categories

0%

10%

20%

30%

All Anglers Anglers >10

trips/yr

Anglers >30%

seek NOP

NOP Ice Anglers Spearers

% o

f U

ser

Su

pp

ort

Page 36: Northern Pike Regulations in the Little Falls Work Areafiles.dnr.state.mn.us/.../littlefalls/nop_roundup_2011.pdfMarch 2011 Randomized subsample generated from license bureau query

Recommended